ML13154A321: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 June 7, 2013 Mr. Thomas D. Gatlin Vice President, Nuclear Operations South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Post Office Box 88 Jenkinsville, SC 29065 VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 -ACCEPTANCE REVIEW CONCERNING TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TASK FORCE TRAVELER-51 0 (TAC NO. MF1384)(RC-13-0047) | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 June 7, 2013 Mr. Thomas D. Gatlin Vice President, Nuclear Operations South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Post Office Box 88 Jenkinsville, SC 29065 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 -ACCEPTANCE REVIEW CONCERNING TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TASK FORCE TRAVELER-51 0 (TAC NO. MF1384)(RC-13-0047) | |||
==Dear Mr. Gatlin:== | ==Dear Mr. Gatlin:== | ||
By letter dated April 2, 2013, as supplemented by a letter dated May 16,2013, the South Carolina Electric & Gas (SCE&G) submitted a license amendment request for Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (VCSNS). The proposed amendment would modify Technical Specification requirements related to steam generator tube inspections and reporting requirements and described in Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) Traveler-510, "Revision to Steam Generator Program Inspection Frequencies and Tube Sample Selection," Revision 2. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. | |||
Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. | By letter dated April 2, 2013, as supplemented by a letter dated May 16,2013, the South Carolina Electric & Gas (SCE&G) submitted a license amendment request for Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (VCSNS). The proposed amendment would modify Technical Specification requirements related to steam generator tube inspections and reporting requirements and described in Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) Traveler- 510, "Revision to Steam Generator Program Inspection Frequencies and Tube Sample Selection," | ||
Revision 2. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | |||
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. | |||
This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | ||
Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | |||
T. Gatlin If you have any questions, please contact the Ms. Eva Brown, at (301) 415-2315. | T. Gatlin -2 If you have any questions, please contact the Ms. Eva Brown, at (301) 415-2315. | ||
Sincerely, IRA! Eva A. Brown, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-395 cc: Distribution via Listserv T. Gatlin -2 If you have any questions, please contact the Ms. Eva Brown, at (301) | Sincerely, IRA! | ||
Eva A. Brown, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-395 cc: Distribution via Listserv | |||
T. Gatlin -2 If you have any questions, please contact the Ms. Eva Brown, at (301) 415-2315. | |||
Sincerely, IRA! | |||
Eva A. Brown, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-395 cc: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION: | |||
PUBLIC RidsDorILpll'-1 Resource RidsNrrDssStsb Resource RidsNrrDorl Resource RidsNrrPMSummer Resource RidsRgn2MailCenter Resource RGrover RidsOgcMailCenter Resource MBarillas RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR Resource LPLlI-1 Reading File RidsLASFigueroa Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource LPLlI-1/BC SFigueroa RPascarelii 06/05/13 06/07/13 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}} | |||
Revision as of 17:25, 4 November 2019
| ML13154A321 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 06/07/2013 |
| From: | Ellen Brown Plant Licensing Branch II |
| To: | Gatlin T South Carolina Electric & Gas Co |
| Brown E NRR/DORL/LPL2-1 | |
| References | |
| TAC MF1384, RC-13-0047 | |
| Download: ML13154A321 (3) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 June 7, 2013 Mr. Thomas D. Gatlin Vice President, Nuclear Operations South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Post Office Box 88 Jenkinsville, SC 29065
SUBJECT:
VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 -ACCEPTANCE REVIEW CONCERNING TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TASK FORCE TRAVELER-51 0 (TAC NO. MF1384)(RC-13-0047)
Dear Mr. Gatlin:
By letter dated April 2, 2013, as supplemented by a letter dated May 16,2013, the South Carolina Electric & Gas (SCE&G) submitted a license amendment request for Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (VCSNS). The proposed amendment would modify Technical Specification requirements related to steam generator tube inspections and reporting requirements and described in Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) Traveler- 510, "Revision to Steam Generator Program Inspection Frequencies and Tube Sample Selection,"
Revision 2. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required.
This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
T. Gatlin -2 If you have any questions, please contact the Ms. Eva Brown, at (301) 415-2315.
Sincerely, IRA!
Eva A. Brown, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-395 cc: Distribution via Listserv
T. Gatlin -2 If you have any questions, please contact the Ms. Eva Brown, at (301) 415-2315.
Sincerely, IRA!
Eva A. Brown, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-395 cc: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC RidsDorILpll'-1 Resource RidsNrrDssStsb Resource RidsNrrDorl Resource RidsNrrPMSummer Resource RidsRgn2MailCenter Resource RGrover RidsOgcMailCenter Resource MBarillas RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR Resource LPLlI-1 Reading File RidsLASFigueroa Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource LPLlI-1/BC SFigueroa RPascarelii 06/05/13 06/07/13 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY