ML18179A156

Comment (27) of Sylvia J. Murphy on License Renewal for Fpl'S Turkey Point

ML18179A156
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	06/28/2018
From:	Murphy S Monroe County, FL, Board of County Commissioners
To:	Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
83FR23726 00027
Download: ML18179A156 (2)

Text

Please provide any suggestions you have on ways the NRC could improve its public meetings:

• • • * ':'. ..... * *****--* ouuoOnno U n ** OnouOn - -* - 00 - 0 * * -- - - * * -* -*

• SUNSI Review Complete COMMENT (27) Template= ADM-013 PUBLICATION DATE: 5/22/2018 E-RIDS=ADM-03 CITATION# 83 FR 23726 ADD= Yvonne Edmonds, Eric Oesterie, LaShawnna Lewis, Benjamin Beasley QR CODE

• • • • • • • • • • • • • -*-******************************-***-************-*****------------************-*********------********--*-****------------------------------------*-----*************-***********-----*-******--********************-----------------------------********---

--**---- ---------. - - --- -- -- - - - ---- - - - - -- - - -- .

UNITED STATES NO POSTAGE NUCLEAR REGULATORY NECESSARY COMMISSION IF MAILED WASHINGTON DC 20555-0001 IN lliE UNITED STATES BUSINESS REPLY MAIL FIRST CLASS MAIL PERMIT NO. 12904 WASHINGTON DC POSTAGE WILL BE PAID BY U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION IL;,.-,.

MAIL STOP:

(HQ staff Only) rrw,-w r

- //tW/YO

~, 1"'~

ORCHOOSE REGION I

. Select Region...

I

.

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON DC 20555-0001

NRC FQRM_659 __ __ U.S. N~CLEAR REGULATORY CO~MISSION APPROVED BY 0MB: NO. 3150-0217 EXPll~ES: 12/31/2019 (04-2017)

Estimated burden per response to comply with this voluntary lnfonnation request 15 minutes. The Information will be used to assess the effectiveness of NRC staff communlcations and outreach with NRC PUBLIC MEETING the public. Send cqmments regarding this estimals to the lnfonna!ion Services.Branch {T-2 F43), U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washlngton, DC 20555-0001, or by e-mail to ~

FEEDBACK Resource@nrc gov and to the Desk Offiter, Office of lnfonnation and Regulatnry Affairs, NEOB-10202 (3150-0217), Office of Management arid Budgei Washington, DC. H_ a means used to impose an Information collection does not display a currentiy varid 0MB control number, the NRC may not coriduc! or sponsor, and a person Is not required to respond to, the Information collection.

Meeting Meeting Date: '5- 3 /- / ~ Title:

I Thank you for attending this public meeting hosted by the NRC. In order to help us und tand your views a meeting and improve future meetings, please take a couple minutes to answer the questions below.

• * * ' I

• There are se~eral ways you can provide your feedback:

1) Scanning the Quick Response (QR} Code on the back of this form with your smartphone to link directly to our feedback page. If you do not have a QR reader on your mobile device, you can use your App store to access available QR scanning applications suitable for your device.

2) Through ariy computer by going to the Public Meeting Schedule and pressing the "Meeting Feedback" link for the specific meeting, or pressing the "[ ... more]" link for a specific meeting and then pressing the "Meeting Feedback" link on the "Meeting Details" page.

3} By filling out this hard copy of our "Public Meeting Feedback Form" and providing it to an NRC staff member or mailing it in.

Please fold on the dotted lines with Business Reply side out, tape the bottom, and mail back to the NRC.

Note: You have up to* 30.days aft~.r. the pieeting t,as ended to submit feedback on. the public meeting that you've .

attended: Thank you again. for your participation. * * **

Please address the following statements in terms of your experience at the meeting. 1 is "strongly disagree" and 5 is "strongly agree." *

• _:;.-:c~:*\1t~?-i:'.~;:-: :~:~;~.:~.- . t::_;~ri;1;::~~l;~-f.t~:~;:;**:\J{;: (~;~~;~; ~-~ "STRONGLY DISAGREE"

"'DISAGREE"

"?,'EITHER AGREE OR DISAGREE" "AGREE" "STRONGLY AGREE"

1. The meeting achieved its stated purpose. 1 2 0 4 5

2. This meeting helped me to understand the topics discussed. 1 2 3 0 5

3. The meeting location, format, starting time, and duration were reasonably convenient.

1 2 3 4 (!)

4. The meeting facility, room set up, microphones, and visuals used contributed to the success of the meeting.

1 2 3

. ..

4 (s)

5. Attendees, includin*g thoi!iifparticipating remotely, were given sufficient opportunity to ask questions or express their views.

1 2 3 4 0

6. Attende_es were listened to and understood by NRC staff. 1 2 3 4 CV

7. .The presentations and explanations given by the NRC staff were understandable, fair and balanced.

1 2 3 4 CV

8. I an:, satisfied overall with the N_RC staff _who participated in the meeting.

1 2 3 4 0

NRC 659 (04-2'o17)