IR 05000333/2023011: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
If you contest the violation or the significance or severity of the violation documented in this inspection report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: | If you contest the violation or the significance or severity of the violation documented in this inspection report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: | ||
Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; the Director, Office of Enforcement; and the NRC Resident Inspector at James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant. | Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555- 0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; the Director, Office of Enforcement; and the NRC Resident Inspector at James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant. | ||
If you disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; and the NRC Resident Inspector at James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant. This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding. | If you disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555 -0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; and the NRC Resident Inspector at James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant. This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding. | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, Mel Gray, Chief Engineering Branch 1 Division of Operating Reactor Safety | ||
Mel Gray, Chief Engineering Branch 1 Division of Operating Reactor Safety Docket No. 05000333 License No. DPR-59 | |||
Docket No. 05000333 License No. DPR-59 | |||
===Enclosure:=== | ===Enclosure:=== | ||
Line 40: | Line 41: | ||
==Inspection Report== | ==Inspection Report== | ||
Docket Number: 05000333 License Number: DPR-59 Report Number: 05000333/2023011 Enterprise Identifier: I-2023-011-0012 Licensee: Constellation Energy Generation, LLC Facility: James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Location: Oswego, NY Inspection Dates: June 5, 2023 to June 20, 2023 Inspectors: J. Brand, Reactor Inspector J. Kulp, Senior Reactor Inspector K. Mangan, Senior Reactor Inspector N. Mentzer, Reactor Inspector Approved By: Mel Gray, Chief Engineering Branch 1 Division of Operating Reactor Safety Enclosure | Docket Number: 05000333 | ||
License Number: DPR-59 | |||
Report Number: 05000333/2023011 | |||
Enterprise Identifier: I-2023-011- 0012 | |||
Licensee: Constellation Energy Generation, LLC | |||
Facility: James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant | |||
Location: Oswego, NY | |||
Inspection Dates: June 5, 2023 to June 20, 2023 | |||
Inspectors: J. Brand, Reactor Inspector J. Kulp, Senior Reactor Inspector K. Mangan, Senior Reactor Inspector N. Mentzer, Reactor Inspector | |||
Approved By: Mel Gray, Chief Engineering Branch 1 Division of Operating Reactor Safety | |||
Enclosure | |||
=SUMMARY= | =SUMMARY= | ||
Line 46: | Line 67: | ||
===List of Findings and Violations=== | ===List of Findings and Violations=== | ||
Deviations in Intake Structure, Tunnel and Riser Age Management Program Not Identified and Corrected Cornerstone Significance Cross-Cutting Report Aspect Section Mitigating Green [P.1] - 71003 Systems NCV 05000333/2023011-01 Identification Open/Closed The team identified a Green non-cited violation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, | |||
Deviations in Intake Structure, Tunnel and Riser Age Management Program Not Identified and Corrected Cornerstone | |||
Corrective Action, which requires that measures be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, and non-conformances are promptly identified and corrected. Specifically, the team determined Constellation Energy Group (CEG) did not perform examination of portions of the safety-related intake structure, tunnel and riser credited to monitor for the effects of aging in accordance with the aging monitoring program (AMP) for structures, and did not enter the deviations into the corrective action program to identify and correct the problems. | Corrective Action, which requires that measures be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, and non-conformances are promptly identified and corrected. Specifically, the team determined Constellation Energy Group (CEG) did not perform examination of portions of the safety-related intake structure, tunnel and riser credited to monitor for the effects of aging in accordance with the aging monitoring program (AMP) for structures, and did not enter the deviations into the corrective action program to identify and correct the problems. | ||
Line 55: | Line 75: | ||
=INSPECTION SCOPES= | =INSPECTION SCOPES= | ||
Inspections were conducted using the appropriate portions of the inspection procedures (IPs) in effect at the beginning of the inspection unless otherwise noted. Currently approved IPs with their attached revision histories are located on the public website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/inspection-procedure/index.html. Samples were declared complete when the IP requirements most appropriate to the inspection activity were met consistent with Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2515, Light-Water Reactor Inspection Program - Operations Phase and IMC 2516, | Inspections were conducted using the appropriate portions of the inspection procedures (IPs) in effect at the beginning of the inspection unless otherwise noted. Currently approved IPs with their attached revision histories are located on the public website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/inspection-procedure/index.html. Samples were declared complete when the IP requirements most appropriate to the inspection activity were met consistent with Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2515, Light-Water Reactor Inspection Program - Operations Phase and IMC 2516, P olicy and Guidance for the License Renewal Inspection Program. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel to assess licensee performance and compliance with Commission rules and regulations, license conditions, site procedures, and standards | ||
==OTHER ACTIVITIES== | ==OTHER ACTIVITIES== | ||
- TEMPORARY INSTRUCTIONS, INFREQUENT AND ABNORMAL | - TEMPORARY INSTRUCTIONS, INFREQUENT AND ABNORMAL | ||
===71003 - Post-Approval Site Inspection for License Renewal The team conducted a Phase 4 license renewal inspection. The following aging management programs were evaluated by the team: | ===71003 - Post-Approval Site Inspection for License Renewal | ||
Post-Approval Site Inspection for License Renewal === | |||
The team conducted a Phase 4 license renewal inspection. The following aging management programs were evaluated by the team: | |||
Post-Approval Site Inspection for License Renewal=== | |||
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71003|count=8}} | {{IP sample|IP=IP 71003|count=8}} | ||
: (1) Buried Piping and Tanks Inspection Program | : (1) Buried Piping and Tanks Inspection Program | ||
Line 73: | Line 96: | ||
==INSPECTION RESULTS== | ==INSPECTION RESULTS== | ||
Deviations in Intake Structure, Tunnel and Riser Age Management Program Not Identified and Corrected Cornerstone | Deviations in Intake Structure, Tunnel and Riser Age Management Program Not Identified and Corrected Cornerstone Significance Cross-Cutting Report Aspect Section Mitigating Green [P.1] - 71003 Systems NCV 05000333/2023011 - 01 Identification Open/Closed The team identified a Green non-cited violation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Action, which requires that measures be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defecti ve material and equipment, and non - conformances are promptly identified and corrected. Specifically, the team determined Constellation Energy Group (CEG) did not perform examination of portions of the safety - related intake structure, tunnel and riser credi ted to monitor for the effects of aging in accordance with the aging monitoring program (AMP) for structures and did not enter the deviations into the corrective action program to identify and correct the problems. | ||
=====Description:===== | =====Description:===== | ||
Line 80: | Line 103: | ||
The team also reviewed corrective actions implemented to address previously issued NRC non-cited violation (NCV) 05000333/2021003-01 which documented incomplete examinations, performed in 2011 and credited for license renewal commitments, of the intake structure, tunnel, and riser. The examination was determined to be incomplete principally due to mussel coverage (50 to 100 percent of the surface to a depth of 1 to 3 inches) such that adequate visual examination of structure surfaces could not be completed. The inspectors reviewed CEG performance of subsequent intake and discharge structure examinations completed in September 2022 (WO 04762293) performed as a corrective action for the NCV. | The team also reviewed corrective actions implemented to address previously issued NRC non-cited violation (NCV) 05000333/2021003-01 which documented incomplete examinations, performed in 2011 and credited for license renewal commitments, of the intake structure, tunnel, and riser. The examination was determined to be incomplete principally due to mussel coverage (50 to 100 percent of the surface to a depth of 1 to 3 inches) such that adequate visual examination of structure surfaces could not be completed. The inspectors reviewed CEG performance of subsequent intake and discharge structure examinations completed in September 2022 (WO 04762293) performed as a corrective action for the NCV. | ||
The inspectors ascertained through record review and discussions with CEG staff that the final third of the intake tunnel, lakeside end, was not examined due to equipment problems (underwater rover cable issue). Also, the 150-foot riser structure was not examined. | The inspectors ascertained through record review and discussions with CEG staff that the final third of the intake tunnel, lakeside end, was not examined due to equipment problems (underwater rover cable issue). Also, the 150- foot riser structure was not examined. | ||
Furthermore, in review of portions of the video record the inspectors ascertained the vast majority of structural surfaces were completely obscured with mussels. | Furthermore, in review of portions of the video record the inspectors ascertained the vast majority of structural surfaces were completely obscured with mussels. | ||
Line 86: | Line 109: | ||
The inspectors reviewed CEG procedure ER-AA-450, "Structures Monitoring," Revision 10, and found that the procedure (and the supporting industrial standard) acceptance criteria involved CEG staff identifying and evaluating concrete surface cracks with widths of 0.4-millimeter (0.015 inch) or larger. The inspectors concluded mussel coverage and not examining significant portions of the intake structure, tunnel and the riser prevented completing exams to this acceptance criteria. The inspectors furthermore determined these were deviations from the procedure and license renewal commitments, and these problems were not entered into the CEG corrective action process to identify and correct the deviations. | The inspectors reviewed CEG procedure ER-AA-450, "Structures Monitoring," Revision 10, and found that the procedure (and the supporting industrial standard) acceptance criteria involved CEG staff identifying and evaluating concrete surface cracks with widths of 0.4-millimeter (0.015 inch) or larger. The inspectors concluded mussel coverage and not examining significant portions of the intake structure, tunnel and the riser prevented completing exams to this acceptance criteria. The inspectors furthermore determined these were deviations from the procedure and license renewal commitments, and these problems were not entered into the CEG corrective action process to identify and correct the deviations. | ||
In discussions with CEG staff, the inspectors ascertained that CEG staff had planned for corrective actions in response to (NCV) 05000333/2021003-01 involving use of an underwater rover with capability to remove mussels; however, this outcome was not realized when the exams were completed in 2022. Additionally, corrective action to examine the full tunnel was intended by procuring a cable sufficiently long to extend rover travel the full tunnel length. | In discussions with CEG staff, the inspectors ascertained that CEG staff had planned for corrective actions in response to (NCV) 05000333/2021003- 01 involving use of an underwater rover with capability to remove mussels; however, this outcome was not realized when the exams were completed in 2022. Additionally, corrective action to examine the full tunnel was intended by procuring a cable sufficiently long to extend rover travel the full tunnel length. H owever, equipment problems resulted in a shorter cable being used in 2022. | ||
Corrective Actions: Following identification of the issue CEG staff entered the issue into the corrective action program to address the deviations in implementation of their structures monitoring examinations for the intake structure, discharge tunnel and riser. | Corrective Actions: Following identification of the issue CEG staff entered the issue into the corrective action program to address the deviations in implementation of their structures monitoring examinations for the intake structure, discharge tunnel and riser. | ||
Line 108: | Line 131: | ||
Enforcement Action: This violation is being treated as a non-cited violation, consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy. | Enforcement Action: This violation is being treated as a non-cited violation, consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy. | ||
Observation: Implementation of the Service Water Integrity Program | Observation: Implementation of the Service Water Integrity Program 71003 The service water integrity program is an aging management program intended to ensure age-related degradation of service water, emergency service water, and residual heat removal service water piping and components is managed so the systems retain their capability to perform their intended safety functions. The aging management program relies on an existing program to implement the recommendations of Generic Letter 89-13 which includes routine and representative non-destructive examination (NDE) of service water piping. In 2014, during the beginning of the period of extended operation, the licensee staff implemented procedure AP-19.12 "Service Water Inspection Program" to perform these inspections and monitor piping for erosion and corrosion. In 2017, the licensee staff retired AP-19.12 and implemented ER-AA-5400 "Buried Piping and Raw Water Integrity Management Programs Guide" and ER-AA-5400-1001 "Raw Water Piping Integrity Management Guide". | ||
The inspectors reviewed these program procedures and the routine and representative sample of NDE inspections from 2014 to present, the current period of extended operation. | The inspectors reviewed these program procedures and the routine and representative sample of NDE inspections from 2014 to present, the current period of extended operation. | ||
Line 114: | Line 137: | ||
The inspectors noted that five ultrasonic tests (UTs) were performed between 2015 and 2016, but only two UTs were performed between 2017 and 2020. In addition, those two UTs were performed to support potential freeze seals for valve maintenance, not scoped as a representative sample of susceptible locations for erosion or corrosion. Also, between 2017 and 2020, six through-wall pipe leaks occurred in the emergency service water piping. Based on this information, the inspectors determined the licensee was not performing routine and representative inspections of raw water piping between the years 2017 and 2020 in accordance with procedure ER-AA-5400-1001. | The inspectors noted that five ultrasonic tests (UTs) were performed between 2015 and 2016, but only two UTs were performed between 2017 and 2020. In addition, those two UTs were performed to support potential freeze seals for valve maintenance, not scoped as a representative sample of susceptible locations for erosion or corrosion. Also, between 2017 and 2020, six through-wall pipe leaks occurred in the emergency service water piping. Based on this information, the inspectors determined the licensee was not performing routine and representative inspections of raw water piping between the years 2017 and 2020 in accordance with procedure ER-AA-5400-1001. | ||
The inspectors determined that in 2019, CEG staff identified the program weakness and developed a site specific document which detailed the implementation of ER-AA-5400 and ER-AA-5400-1001 for the James A. FitzPatrick raw water piping integrity program. The inspectors review determined that since then, susceptible service water piping locations were scoped into the program plan, three UTs were performed in 2021 and 2022, and twelve UTs were scheduled in 2023 and 2024. Based on the review of the current service water integrity program and UTs, the inspectors determined there was not performance deficiencies of more than minor significance. In addition, CEG staff entered the issue into their corrective action program (AR 04686453) to evaluate the gaps between the site-specific program and fleet level procedure ER-AA-5400-1001. | The inspectors determined that in 2019, CEG staff identified the program weakness and developed a site specific document which detailed the implementation of ER-AA-5400 and ER-AA-5400- 1001 for the James A. FitzPatrick raw water piping integrity program. The inspectors review determined that since then, susceptible service water piping locations were scoped into the program plan, three UTs were performed in 2021 and 2022, and twelve UTs were scheduled in 2023 and 2024. Based on the review of the current service water integrity program and UTs, the inspectors determined there was not performance deficiencies of more than minor significance. In addition, CEG staff entered the issue into their corrective action program (AR 04686453) to evaluate the gaps between the site-specific program and fleet level procedure ER-AA-5400-1001. | ||
==EXIT MEETINGS AND DEBRIEFS== | ==EXIT MEETINGS AND DEBRIEFS== | ||
Line 123: | Line 146: | ||
=DOCUMENTS REVIEWED= | =DOCUMENTS REVIEWED= | ||
Inspection Type | Inspection Type Designation Description or Title Revision or | ||
Procedure | Procedure Date | ||
71003 | 71003 Calculations JAF-Calc-13-Minimum Acceptable Wall Thickness for 76-10-WF-151-38 Revision 0 | ||
00011 | 00011 | ||
71003 | 71003 Corrective Action IR 4672847, | ||
Documents | Documents 4674829, | ||
4672892, | 4672892, | ||
4673187, | 4673187, | ||
Line 142: | Line 165: | ||
CR-JAF-2013- | CR-JAF-2013- | ||
2872 | 2872 | ||
71003 | 71003 Corrective Action IR 04683565, | ||
Documents | Documents 04683531, | ||
Resulting from | Resulting from 04683489, | ||
Inspection | Inspection 04683423, | ||
04683742, | 04683742, | ||
04683754, | 04683754, | ||
04683808, | 04683808, | ||
04686453 | 04686453 | ||
71003 | 71003 Drawings 11825-FC-42A Intake & Discharge Tunnels Plan and Profile Revision 4 | ||
71003 | 71003 Drawings 11825-FC-42B Intake & Discharge Tunnel Details-SH.1 Revision 4 | ||
71003 | 71003 Drawings 11825-FC-43B Intake Structure General Arrangement Revision 6 | ||
71003 | 71003 Drawings 11825-FC-43D Intake Structure Concrete Details, SH-2 Revision 3 | ||
71003 | 71003 Engineering JAF-1-2017-0446 Simple Issue Risk Assessment, ESW Piping Degradation 6/7/2021 | ||
Evaluations | Evaluations | ||
71003 | 71003 Miscellaneous PMC-23-140294 Justification for Proposed PMMR to PM Database - CST 3/29/2023 | ||
Inspection Frequency | Inspection Frequency 3/28/2023 | ||
Inspection Type | Inspection Type Designation Description or Title Revision or | ||
Procedure | Procedure Date | ||
71003 | 71003 Miscellaneous SEP-SW-JAF-NRC Generic Letter 89-13 Service Water Program Revision 0 | ||
0001 | 0001 | ||
71003 | 71003 Procedures AP-19.12 Service Water Inspection Program Revision 8 | ||
71003 | 71003 Procedures B13UT008 UT Erosion/Corrosion Examination 6/7/2013 | ||
71003 | 71003 Procedures CY-AA-120-400 Closed Cooling Water Chemistry Revision 21 | ||
71003 | 71003 Procedures CY-AA-120-4000 Closed Cooling Water Chemistry Strategic Plan Revision 11 | ||
71003 | 71003 Procedures CY-AA-120-4000- Fitzpatrick Closed Loop Cooling Water Treatment and Revision 0 | ||
F-06 | F-06 Control | ||
71003 | 71003 Procedures EF-JF-331-1001 James A. FitzPatrick Reactor Pressure Vessel & Internals Revision 4 | ||
Program Bases Document | Program Bases Document | ||
71003 | 71003 Procedures ER-AA-300-150 Cable Condition Monitoring Program Revision 8 | ||
71003 | 71003 Procedures ER-AA-450 Structures Monitoring Revision 11 | ||
71003 | 71003 Procedures ER-AA-5400 Buried Piping and Raw Water Integrity Management Revision 13 | ||
Programs Guide | Programs Guide | ||
71003 | 71003 Procedures ER-AA-5400- Raw Water Piping Integrity Management Guide Revision 12 | ||
1001 | 1001 | ||
71003 | 71003 Procedures ER-JF-450 James A. Fitzpatrick Structures Monitoring Program Revision 0 | ||
71003 | 71003 Procedures JAF-RPT-05-Aging Management Program Evaluation Report Revision 6 | ||
LRD02 | LRD02 | ||
71003 | 71003 Procedures JAF-RPT-09-Review of the Periodic Surveillance and Preventative Revision 0 | ||
LR002 | LR002 Maintenance Aging Management Program for License | ||
Renewal Implementation | Renewal Implementation | ||
71003 | 71003 Procedures MA-AA-723-500 Inspection of Non-EQ Cables and Connections for Managing Revision 13 | ||
Adverse Localized Environments | Adverse Localized Environments | ||
71003 | 71003 Procedures SEP-UIP-JAF Underground Components Inspection Plan Revision 4 | ||
71003 | 71003 Procedures SP-01.23 Diesel Fire Pump, Emergency Diesel Generator, and Revision 21 | ||
Security Propane Generator Coolant Corrosion Inhibitor | Security Propane Generator Coolant Corrosion Inhibitor | ||
Sampling and Analysis | Sampling and Analysis | ||
71003 | 71003 Procedures SP-01.25 Reactor Building Closed Loop Cooling Sampling and Revision 24 | ||
Analysis | Analysis | ||
71003 | 71003 Work Orders 00199975 01, | ||
04845778 01, | 04845778 01, | ||
04897862, | 04897862, |
Latest revision as of 18:22, 13 November 2024
ML23206A035 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | FitzPatrick |
Issue date: | 07/25/2023 |
From: | Mel Gray NRC/RGN-I/DORS |
To: | Rhoades D Constellation Energy Generation, Constellation Nuclear |
References | |
IR 2023011 | |
Download: ML23206A035 (1) | |
Text
July 25, 2023
SUBJECT:
JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT - POST-APPROVAL SITE INSPECTION FOR LICENSE RENEWAL - PHASE 4 INSPECTION REPORT 05000333/2023011
Dear David Rhoades:
On June 20, 2023, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant and discussed the results of this inspection with Jason Arcia, Director Site Operations, and other members of your staff. The results of this inspection are documented in the enclosed report.
One finding of very low safety significance (Green) is documented in this report. This finding involved a violation of NRC requirements. We are treating this violation as a non-cited violation (NCV) consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy.
If you contest the violation or the significance or severity of the violation documented in this inspection report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555- 0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; the Director, Office of Enforcement; and the NRC Resident Inspector at James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant.
If you disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555 -0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; and the NRC Resident Inspector at James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant. This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.
Sincerely, Mel Gray, Chief Engineering Branch 1 Division of Operating Reactor Safety
Docket No. 05000333 License No. DPR-59
Enclosure:
As stated
Inspection Report
Docket Number: 05000333
License Number: DPR-59
Report Number: 05000333/2023011
Enterprise Identifier: I-2023-011- 0012
Licensee: Constellation Energy Generation, LLC
Facility: James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant
Location: Oswego, NY
Inspection Dates: June 5, 2023 to June 20, 2023
Inspectors: J. Brand, Reactor Inspector J. Kulp, Senior Reactor Inspector K. Mangan, Senior Reactor Inspector N. Mentzer, Reactor Inspector
Approved By: Mel Gray, Chief Engineering Branch 1 Division of Operating Reactor Safety
Enclosure
SUMMARY
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) continued monitoring the licensees performance by conducting an NRC inspection at James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant, in accordance with the Reactor Oversight Process. The Reactor Oversight Process is the NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors. Refer to https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/oversight.html for more information.
List of Findings and Violations
Deviations in Intake Structure, Tunnel and Riser Age Management Program Not Identified and Corrected Cornerstone Significance Cross-Cutting Report Aspect Section Mitigating Green [P.1] - 71003 Systems NCV 05000333/2023011-01 Identification Open/Closed The team identified a Green non-cited violation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI,
Corrective Action, which requires that measures be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, and non-conformances are promptly identified and corrected. Specifically, the team determined Constellation Energy Group (CEG) did not perform examination of portions of the safety-related intake structure, tunnel and riser credited to monitor for the effects of aging in accordance with the aging monitoring program (AMP) for structures, and did not enter the deviations into the corrective action program to identify and correct the problems.
Additional Tracking Items
None.
INSPECTION SCOPES
Inspections were conducted using the appropriate portions of the inspection procedures (IPs) in effect at the beginning of the inspection unless otherwise noted. Currently approved IPs with their attached revision histories are located on the public website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/inspection-procedure/index.html. Samples were declared complete when the IP requirements most appropriate to the inspection activity were met consistent with Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2515, Light-Water Reactor Inspection Program - Operations Phase and IMC 2516, P olicy and Guidance for the License Renewal Inspection Program. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel to assess licensee performance and compliance with Commission rules and regulations, license conditions, site procedures, and standards
OTHER ACTIVITIES
- TEMPORARY INSTRUCTIONS, INFREQUENT AND ABNORMAL
===71003 - Post-Approval Site Inspection for License Renewal
The team conducted a Phase 4 license renewal inspection. The following aging management programs were evaluated by the team:
Post-Approval Site Inspection for License Renewal===
- (1) Buried Piping and Tanks Inspection Program
- (2) BWR Vessel Internals Program
- (3) Fire Water System Program
- (4) Periodic Surveillance and Preventive Maintenance Program
- (5) Service Water Integrity Program
- (6) Structures Monitoring Program
- (7) Non-EQ Insulated Cables and Connections Program
- (8) Water Chemistry Control - Closed Cooling Water Program
INSPECTION RESULTS
Deviations in Intake Structure, Tunnel and Riser Age Management Program Not Identified and Corrected Cornerstone Significance Cross-Cutting Report Aspect Section Mitigating Green [P.1] - 71003 Systems NCV 05000333/2023011 - 01 Identification Open/Closed The team identified a Green non-cited violation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Action, which requires that measures be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defecti ve material and equipment, and non - conformances are promptly identified and corrected. Specifically, the team determined Constellation Energy Group (CEG) did not perform examination of portions of the safety - related intake structure, tunnel and riser credi ted to monitor for the effects of aging in accordance with the aging monitoring program (AMP) for structures and did not enter the deviations into the corrective action program to identify and correct the problems.
Description:
The team evaluated CEGs performance in implementing their AMP for structures to determine if the program was implemented to identify age-related degradation as described in the updated final safety analysis report and that the implementing procedure was consistent with licensing commitments. Additionally, the team reviewed completed examination results to determine if age-related degradation was evaluated and corrective actions were performed, if required, based on examination results.
The team also reviewed corrective actions implemented to address previously issued NRC non-cited violation (NCV)05000333/2021003-01 which documented incomplete examinations, performed in 2011 and credited for license renewal commitments, of the intake structure, tunnel, and riser. The examination was determined to be incomplete principally due to mussel coverage (50 to 100 percent of the surface to a depth of 1 to 3 inches) such that adequate visual examination of structure surfaces could not be completed. The inspectors reviewed CEG performance of subsequent intake and discharge structure examinations completed in September 2022 (WO 04762293) performed as a corrective action for the NCV.
The inspectors ascertained through record review and discussions with CEG staff that the final third of the intake tunnel, lakeside end, was not examined due to equipment problems (underwater rover cable issue). Also, the 150- foot riser structure was not examined.
Furthermore, in review of portions of the video record the inspectors ascertained the vast majority of structural surfaces were completely obscured with mussels.
The inspectors reviewed CEG procedure ER-AA-450, "Structures Monitoring," Revision 10, and found that the procedure (and the supporting industrial standard) acceptance criteria involved CEG staff identifying and evaluating concrete surface cracks with widths of 0.4-millimeter (0.015 inch) or larger. The inspectors concluded mussel coverage and not examining significant portions of the intake structure, tunnel and the riser prevented completing exams to this acceptance criteria. The inspectors furthermore determined these were deviations from the procedure and license renewal commitments, and these problems were not entered into the CEG corrective action process to identify and correct the deviations.
In discussions with CEG staff, the inspectors ascertained that CEG staff had planned for corrective actions in response to (NCV) 05000333/2021003- 01 involving use of an underwater rover with capability to remove mussels; however, this outcome was not realized when the exams were completed in 2022. Additionally, corrective action to examine the full tunnel was intended by procuring a cable sufficiently long to extend rover travel the full tunnel length. H owever, equipment problems resulted in a shorter cable being used in 2022.
Corrective Actions: Following identification of the issue CEG staff entered the issue into the corrective action program to address the deviations in implementation of their structures monitoring examinations for the intake structure, discharge tunnel and riser.
Corrective Action References: AR 04683808
Performance Assessment:
Performance Deficiency: CEG staff did not identify and correct deviations associated with their examination in 2022 of the safety-related intake structure tunnel and riser which was a performance deficiency. Specifically, the examinations of the intake tunnel and riser structural surfaces, credited to for the effects of aging, were not fully completed or capable of assessing the conditions to the acceptance criteria in CEG procedure ER-AA-450, Revision 11 and these deviations were not entered into the corrective action program for resolution.
Screening: The inspectors determined the performance deficiency was more than minor because if left uncorrected, it would have the potential to lead to a more significant safety concern. The inspector used Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0612 Appendix E, Examples of Minor Issues, to inform the screening, and considered that the performance deficiency was similar to Example 13a. Specifically, absent NRCs intervention, the acceptability of the condition of the intake structure tunnel and riser were not demonstrated through effective examination for the effects of aging.
Significance: The inspectors assessed the significance of the finding using IMC 0609 Appendix A, The Significance Determination Process (SDP) for Findings At-Power. The team determined the finding was a deficiency affecting the design or qualification of a mitigating structure, system or component that did not result in loss of operability or probabilistic risk assessment functionality. This was based on consideration that the video record of the tunnel examination did not show evidence of surface cover concrete spalls on the floor and a rover examination of the riser for other purposes in 2018 did not show evidence of structural problems. Therefore, the team determined the finding to be of very low safety significance (Green).
Cross-Cutting Aspect: P.1 - Identification: The organization implements a corrective action program with a low threshold for identifying issues. Individuals identify issues completely, accurately, and in a timely manner in accordance with the program. Specifically, CEG staff did not identify and place in the corrective action program that examinations of the intake structure, tunnel and riser could not be performed as described in the implementing procedure and required by the associated AMP.
Enforcement:
Violation: 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Action, requires measures to be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, and non-conformances are promptly identified and corrected.
Contrary to the above, following completion of structure monitoring examinations credited to meet the requirement of the structures monitoring Aging Management Program on September 1, 2022, CEG failed to enter examination deviations into the corrective action program for identification and correction. Specifically, CEG did not identify and correct deviations involving the examination of the intake structure tunnel and riser for conditions credited to manage the effects of aging.
Enforcement Action: This violation is being treated as a non-cited violation, consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy.
Observation: Implementation of the Service Water Integrity Program 71003 The service water integrity program is an aging management program intended to ensure age-related degradation of service water, emergency service water, and residual heat removal service water piping and components is managed so the systems retain their capability to perform their intended safety functions. The aging management program relies on an existing program to implement the recommendations of Generic Letter 89-13 which includes routine and representative non-destructive examination (NDE) of service water piping. In 2014, during the beginning of the period of extended operation, the licensee staff implemented procedure AP-19.12 "Service Water Inspection Program" to perform these inspections and monitor piping for erosion and corrosion. In 2017, the licensee staff retired AP-19.12 and implemented ER-AA-5400 "Buried Piping and Raw Water Integrity Management Programs Guide" and ER-AA-5400-1001 "Raw Water Piping Integrity Management Guide".
The inspectors reviewed these program procedures and the routine and representative sample of NDE inspections from 2014 to present, the current period of extended operation.
The inspectors noted that five ultrasonic tests (UTs) were performed between 2015 and 2016, but only two UTs were performed between 2017 and 2020. In addition, those two UTs were performed to support potential freeze seals for valve maintenance, not scoped as a representative sample of susceptible locations for erosion or corrosion. Also, between 2017 and 2020, six through-wall pipe leaks occurred in the emergency service water piping. Based on this information, the inspectors determined the licensee was not performing routine and representative inspections of raw water piping between the years 2017 and 2020 in accordance with procedure ER-AA-5400-1001.
The inspectors determined that in 2019, CEG staff identified the program weakness and developed a site specific document which detailed the implementation of ER-AA-5400 and ER-AA-5400- 1001 for the James A. FitzPatrick raw water piping integrity program. The inspectors review determined that since then, susceptible service water piping locations were scoped into the program plan, three UTs were performed in 2021 and 2022, and twelve UTs were scheduled in 2023 and 2024. Based on the review of the current service water integrity program and UTs, the inspectors determined there was not performance deficiencies of more than minor significance. In addition, CEG staff entered the issue into their corrective action program (AR 04686453) to evaluate the gaps between the site-specific program and fleet level procedure ER-AA-5400-1001.
EXIT MEETINGS AND DEBRIEFS
The inspectors verified no proprietary information was retained or documented in this report.
- On June 9, 2023, the inspectors presented the Inspection Status inspection results to Timothy Peter, Site Vice President, and other members of the licensee staff.
- On June 20, 2023, the inspectors presented the NRC inspection results to Jason Arcia, Director Site Operations, and other members of the licensee staff.
DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
Inspection Type Designation Description or Title Revision or
Procedure Date
71003 Calculations JAF-Calc-13-Minimum Acceptable Wall Thickness for 76-10-WF-151-38 Revision 0
00011
71003 Corrective Action IR 4672847,
Documents 4674829,
4672892,
4673187,
4673188,
3848063,
25460, 512708,
4416219,
4680776,
4680774,
4438445,
4439048,
4442095
CR-JAF-2013-
2872
71003 Corrective Action IR 04683565,
Documents 04683531,
Resulting from 04683489,
Inspection 04683423,
04683742,
04683754,
04683808,
04686453
71003 Drawings 11825-FC-42A Intake & Discharge Tunnels Plan and Profile Revision 4
71003 Drawings 11825-FC-42B Intake & Discharge Tunnel Details-SH.1 Revision 4
71003 Drawings 11825-FC-43B Intake Structure General Arrangement Revision 6
71003 Drawings 11825-FC-43D Intake Structure Concrete Details, SH-2 Revision 3
71003 Engineering JAF-1-2017-0446 Simple Issue Risk Assessment, ESW Piping Degradation 6/7/2021
Evaluations
71003 Miscellaneous PMC-23-140294 Justification for Proposed PMMR to PM Database - CST 3/29/2023
Inspection Frequency 3/28/2023
Inspection Type Designation Description or Title Revision or
Procedure Date
71003 Miscellaneous SEP-SW-JAF-NRC Generic Letter 89-13 Service Water Program Revision 0
0001
71003 Procedures AP-19.12 Service Water Inspection Program Revision 8
71003 Procedures B13UT008 UT Erosion/Corrosion Examination 6/7/2013
71003 Procedures CY-AA-120-400 Closed Cooling Water Chemistry Revision 21
71003 Procedures CY-AA-120-4000 Closed Cooling Water Chemistry Strategic Plan Revision 11
71003 Procedures CY-AA-120-4000- Fitzpatrick Closed Loop Cooling Water Treatment and Revision 0
F-06 Control
71003 Procedures EF-JF-331-1001 James A. FitzPatrick Reactor Pressure Vessel & Internals Revision 4
Program Bases Document
71003 Procedures ER-AA-300-150 Cable Condition Monitoring Program Revision 8
71003 Procedures ER-AA-450 Structures Monitoring Revision 11
71003 Procedures ER-AA-5400 Buried Piping and Raw Water Integrity Management Revision 13
Programs Guide
71003 Procedures ER-AA-5400- Raw Water Piping Integrity Management Guide Revision 12
1001
71003 Procedures ER-JF-450 James A. Fitzpatrick Structures Monitoring Program Revision 0
71003 Procedures JAF-RPT-05-Aging Management Program Evaluation Report Revision 6
LRD02
71003 Procedures JAF-RPT-09-Review of the Periodic Surveillance and Preventative Revision 0
LR002 Maintenance Aging Management Program for License
Renewal Implementation
71003 Procedures MA-AA-723-500 Inspection of Non-EQ Cables and Connections for Managing Revision 13
Adverse Localized Environments
71003 Procedures SEP-UIP-JAF Underground Components Inspection Plan Revision 4
71003 Procedures SP-01.23 Diesel Fire Pump, Emergency Diesel Generator, and Revision 21
Security Propane Generator Coolant Corrosion Inhibitor
Sampling and Analysis
71003 Procedures SP-01.25 Reactor Building Closed Loop Cooling Sampling and Revision 24
Analysis
71003 Work Orders 00199975 01,
04845778 01,
04897862,
04762293
8