ML20155F191: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:e 4 t' e *e, UNITED STATES | ||
!)\ / | |||
,1 ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION U * ".. ' | |||
W ASHINGToN. D.C. 20545 i gh 14 B74 k IgqiN Docket No. 50-416/417 Applicant: Mississippi Power & Light Company Facility: Grand Gulf Nuclear St- ion, Units 1 and 2 | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
OF MEETINGS WITH MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT COMPANY ON APRIL 30,1974 AND MAY 2,1974 The staff met with the Missippi Power & Light Co. (MP&L) representatives on April 30,1974 and on May 2,1974, in Bethesda. The lists of attendees for these ineetings are provided as Enclosures 1 and 2. | |||
The purpose of the April 30 meeting was to consider the applicant's proposed revision to its combustible gas control system design. The applicant proposes to make this design modification contingent upon the planned revision to | |||
. Regulatory Guide 1.7. The principal feature of this design change would be to force the dry well atmosphere following a LOCA, through the suppression pool, using compressors which can receive their power from the emergency electrical system. The staff concluded from the presentation by the applicant that the design concept is acceptable and that it can be engineered to meet acceptable criteria. Advantages of the system compared with that proposed to meet the present Regulatory Guide 1.7 requirements are as follows: | |||
: 1. a reduction from 7 to 4 penetrations through the dry well wall for the combustible gas control system; | |||
: 2. a maximum penetration size of 10 inches compared with 24 inches in the present design; | |||
: 3. the containment atmosphere would not bypass the suppression pool as in the present design; and | |||
: 4. the bypass available in the event any single penetration is left open by valve failure would not exceed the allowable bypass from any dze l pipe break. In addition, with the design basis LOCA (double-endea I break) all four penetrations could be left open and the bypass area I would not result in overpressurization of the containment. | |||
The applicant's proposed guard pipe design and criteria which had been filed in draft form, were found to be acceptable. The applicant plans to file this information formally before May 9,1974. | |||
l 9806160309 080606 PDR FOIA CONNOH88-91 PDR , | |||
MAY 11 1974 The staff reported that it had found the General Electric Company's analysis of vent uncovery following a LOCA to be acceptable. Basically, the staff found that the potential for excessive bypass was acceptably low. However, the staff - | |||
also reported that it was not satisfied with the General Electric Company's analysis of forces generated in the suppression pool area from possible wave effects . At this meeting, the General Electric Company provided further infor-mation regarding forces generated in the suppression pool from wave action. | |||
This additional information was subsequently reviewed by the staff. | |||
The staff met with MP&L on May 2,1974 to discuss the applicant's response to information requested by the ACRS in its staff's letter of April 2,1974, regarding containment matters. The Regulatory Staff is in substantial agreement with - | |||
the information which has been developed by the applicant. A copy is enclosed. | |||
'/ | |||
* /dnb ''/N>h G. F. Owsley / | |||
Project Manager Light Water Reactors Branch 1-2 Directorate of Licensing | |||
==Enclosures:== | |||
(1) List of Attendees, April 30, 1974 Meeting (2) List of Attendees, May 2,1974 Meeting (3) "Mark III Pressure Suppression System Loads on Structures" l | |||
l 1 | |||
4 | |||
- , , - - , . . . ,l', - - . | |||
d ATTENDANCE AT MEETING OF 4/30/74 Name Org. | |||
. G. Owsley AEC J. Orndoff AEC R. L. Ashley Bechtel T. W. Habermas Bechtel D. Heilig Bechtel R. Bower Bechtel V. Bert Bechtel 9 | |||
J. Parikh Bechtel M. C. Mauderly Bechtel C. L. Reid Bechtel i | |||
N. B. Willoughby Bechtel F. C. Hatch G.E. | |||
L. J. Sobon G.E. | |||
J. P. McGaughy MP&L I | |||
1 i | |||
i l | |||
2 ! | |||
i | |||
. _ _ . . - . . . . - . . . . . . . _ _ . - . _ , _ _ _ _ . _ - - . . . _ _ _ _ _ . , , -.. _ ., _ . , , 7._, | |||
4 3 ATTENDANCE AT MEETING'0F S/2/74 , | |||
Name Org. | |||
G. Owsley AEC J. Kudrick AEC R. Tedesco AEC L. Slegers AEC G. Lainas AEC R.-Cudlin AEC H. P. Marsh Bechtel W. C. Barnhoir GE J. P. McGaughy, Jr. MP&L L. F. Dale MP&L N. H. Starnpley MP&L ; | |||
L. J. Sobon GE J. J. Tkacik Bechtel F. P. Schauer AEC l l | |||
R. P. Barr GE D. A. Rockwell GE A. S. McCurdy MP&L j | |||
+ | |||
__...-9.....s . . . . .w 4. . - . 4... 9 -. .. | |||
.+-9.-4...- . . . - . - 2 . - i 8 * -~ N * == s e s ..- 4 .s . 4 .- | |||
I. . , | |||
l ? | |||
's . | |||
y L ... +... . , | |||
9' . : | |||
<-L... | |||
. . -s .- -.4- . - . . . | |||
. .1, .-. - . - . . - - - . - . - . -. . . e. - ... , | |||
t t | |||
< c, w | |||
-4 a ,,g , , , . . h | |||
.._.-4.. . . . . , , . . . . | |||
A _a am / | |||
m i | |||
6 | |||
.ftrt w wC.1 phacku: !!T, 3o | |||
~ | |||
f.2 peusmt / tam /gw,.uusW JwM | |||
~2 4>&o A 7 v.24.ej ) | |||
. L.. | |||
.e..h..e GE.ckL4- | |||
. . - . . . . . . . - . .. . .p - .. | |||
2 P- -' j | |||
. . . - . - . . - . .. ,? . y "-. . . 1. . .) * | |||
. - - - . . . ~~ . . | |||
l....-...-, | |||
t l . | |||
.. - . . - . - - ---...E . - _ . . . --. - - . _ . | |||
. . - . - _ . . . . . . . . . + . | |||
_ . -w . . . - . . - . - - . - . .-. ,-. . . . . ... . . . -. . _. | |||
/ | |||
._ _ .. .._ . ... . . _ - . . _ _ . . . . . . . s . . _ . . . . . . . .. | |||
. _ . , ._ . . _ . . _ i __. _. .. | |||
a _. _ . _ . _ ._ _. -. . | |||
. . - . . ..- v . . . - . | |||
r . | |||
. _. x . . . - . . . . . | |||
i | |||
.. . . ; 4 l | |||
.._..-..n..... .- . .-. .. . . . . . . . . . ... | |||
{ | |||
7- .. , | |||
YQL/J & kLCy .. - .. . . . - . .. . . . .. ...- .. .. - - . . . | |||
l 7._ . _ . . . - . . . . , . - - _ . . . . . . . . . . . _ | |||
._ _e.- - - | |||
. ...+W=-. | |||
. - . - - * . . . . = . - - - - - . . . - . .. e- I i | |||
__ _ ,_\__.... 7 .. .-. | |||
3.. - . _ -.. | |||
...-.7-..-__... . | |||
__k i. | |||
i , 1 . | |||
i fik..-.-......_.4.-. | |||
i 9 p%I . ! t. I | |||
.i e . 6 ~m | |||
.}} |
Latest revision as of 14:53, 17 December 2020
ML20155F191 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Grand Gulf, 05000000 |
Issue date: | 05/14/1974 |
From: | Owsley G US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
To: | US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
Shared Package | |
ML20155E140 | List:
|
References | |
FOIA-88-91 NUDOCS 8806160309 | |
Download: ML20155F191 (5) | |
Text
e 4 t' e *e, UNITED STATES
!)\ /
,1 ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION U * ".. '
W ASHINGToN. D.C. 20545 i gh 14 B74 k IgqiN Docket No. 50-416/417 Applicant: Mississippi Power & Light Company Facility: Grand Gulf Nuclear St- ion, Units 1 and 2
SUMMARY
OF MEETINGS WITH MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT COMPANY ON APRIL 30,1974 AND MAY 2,1974 The staff met with the Missippi Power & Light Co. (MP&L) representatives on April 30,1974 and on May 2,1974, in Bethesda. The lists of attendees for these ineetings are provided as Enclosures 1 and 2.
The purpose of the April 30 meeting was to consider the applicant's proposed revision to its combustible gas control system design. The applicant proposes to make this design modification contingent upon the planned revision to
. Regulatory Guide 1.7. The principal feature of this design change would be to force the dry well atmosphere following a LOCA, through the suppression pool, using compressors which can receive their power from the emergency electrical system. The staff concluded from the presentation by the applicant that the design concept is acceptable and that it can be engineered to meet acceptable criteria. Advantages of the system compared with that proposed to meet the present Regulatory Guide 1.7 requirements are as follows:
- 1. a reduction from 7 to 4 penetrations through the dry well wall for the combustible gas control system;
- 2. a maximum penetration size of 10 inches compared with 24 inches in the present design;
- 3. the containment atmosphere would not bypass the suppression pool as in the present design; and
- 4. the bypass available in the event any single penetration is left open by valve failure would not exceed the allowable bypass from any dze l pipe break. In addition, with the design basis LOCA (double-endea I break) all four penetrations could be left open and the bypass area I would not result in overpressurization of the containment.
The applicant's proposed guard pipe design and criteria which had been filed in draft form, were found to be acceptable. The applicant plans to file this information formally before May 9,1974.
l 9806160309 080606 PDR FOIA CONNOH88-91 PDR ,
MAY 11 1974 The staff reported that it had found the General Electric Company's analysis of vent uncovery following a LOCA to be acceptable. Basically, the staff found that the potential for excessive bypass was acceptably low. However, the staff -
also reported that it was not satisfied with the General Electric Company's analysis of forces generated in the suppression pool area from possible wave effects . At this meeting, the General Electric Company provided further infor-mation regarding forces generated in the suppression pool from wave action.
This additional information was subsequently reviewed by the staff.
The staff met with MP&L on May 2,1974 to discuss the applicant's response to information requested by the ACRS in its staff's letter of April 2,1974, regarding containment matters. The Regulatory Staff is in substantial agreement with -
the information which has been developed by the applicant. A copy is enclosed.
'/
- /dnb /N>h G. F. Owsley /
Project Manager Light Water Reactors Branch 1-2 Directorate of Licensing
Enclosures:
(1) List of Attendees, April 30, 1974 Meeting (2) List of Attendees, May 2,1974 Meeting (3) "Mark III Pressure Suppression System Loads on Structures" l
l 1
4
- , , - - , . . . ,l', - - .
d ATTENDANCE AT MEETING OF 4/30/74 Name Org.
. G. Owsley AEC J. Orndoff AEC R. L. Ashley Bechtel T. W. Habermas Bechtel D. Heilig Bechtel R. Bower Bechtel V. Bert Bechtel 9
J. Parikh Bechtel M. C. Mauderly Bechtel C. L. Reid Bechtel i
N. B. Willoughby Bechtel F. C. Hatch G.E.
L. J. Sobon G.E.
J. P. McGaughy MP&L I
1 i
i l
2 !
i
. _ _ . . - . . . . - . . . . . . . _ _ . - . _ , _ _ _ _ . _ - - . . . _ _ _ _ _ . , , -.. _ ., _ . , , 7._,
4 3 ATTENDANCE AT MEETING'0F S/2/74 ,
Name Org.
G. Owsley AEC J. Kudrick AEC R. Tedesco AEC L. Slegers AEC G. Lainas AEC R.-Cudlin AEC H. P. Marsh Bechtel W. C. Barnhoir GE J. P. McGaughy, Jr. MP&L L. F. Dale MP&L N. H. Starnpley MP&L ;
L. J. Sobon GE J. J. Tkacik Bechtel F. P. Schauer AEC l l
R. P. Barr GE D. A. Rockwell GE A. S. McCurdy MP&L j
+
__...-9.....s . . . . .w 4. . - . 4... 9 -. ..
.+-9.-4...- . . . - . - 2 . - i 8 * -~ N * == s e s ..- 4 .s . 4 .-
I. . ,
l ?
's .
y L ... +... . ,
9' . :
<-L...
. . -s .- -.4- . - . . .
. .1, .-. - . - . . - - - . - . - . -. . . e. - ... ,
t t
< c, w
-4 a ,,g , , , . . h
.._.-4.. . . . . , , . . . .
A _a am /
m i
6
.ftrt w wC.1 phacku: !!T, 3o
~
f.2 peusmt / tam /gw,.uusW JwM
~2 4>&o A 7 v.24.ej )
. L..
.e..h..e GE.ckL4-
. . - . . . . . . . - . .. . .p - ..
2 P- -' j
. . . - . - . . - . .. ,? . y "-. . . 1. . .) *
. - - - . . . ~~ . .
l....-...-,
t l .
.. - . . - . - - ---...E . - _ . . . --. - - . _ .
. . - . - _ . . . . . . . . . + .
_ . -w . . . - . . - . - - . - . .-. ,-. . . . . ... . . . -. . _.
/
._ _ .. .._ . ... . . _ - . . _ _ . . . . . . . s . . _ . . . . . . . ..
. _ . , ._ . . _ . . _ i __. _. ..
a _. _ . _ . _ ._ _. -. .
. . - . . ..- v . . . - .
r .
. _. x . . . - . . . . .
i
.. . . ; 4 l
.._..-..n..... .- . .-. .. . . . . . . . . . ...
{
7- .. ,
YQL/J & kLCy .. - .. . . . - . .. . . . .. ...- .. .. - - . . .
l 7._ . _ . . . - . . . . , . - - _ . . . . . . . . . . . _
._ _e.- - -
. ...+W=-.
. - . - - * . . . . = . - - - - - . . . - . .. e- I i
__ _ ,_\__.... 7 .. .-.
3.. - . _ -..
...-.7-..-__... .
__k i.
i , 1 .
i fik..-.-......_.4.-.
i 9 p%I . ! t. I
.i e . 6 ~m
.