ML20077A095: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:-. | ||
s | |||
#f Q | |||
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CHATTANOOGA. TENNESSEE.374ot - | |||
' 400 Chestnut Street Tower II July 8, 1983 U.S.1 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II-ATTN: _ James P.'O'Reilly, Regional Administrator | |||
'101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 | |||
==Dear Mr. O'Reilly:== | |||
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND' ENFORCEMENT BULLETIN 80 RII:JPO 50-259, -260, -296 - BROWNS FERRY. NUCLEAR PLANT As required by IE Bulletin 80-13, a visual inspection of the core spray sparger and piping was performed on Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant | |||
-unit 1 during the current rcrueling outags. The report required by the bulletic is enclosed. | |||
7.f you have any questions, please call Jim Doser at FT3 858a2725. | |||
To the best -of :ny knowledge, I declare the statements contained herein are comp 3ete and true. | |||
Very truly yours, TENNZSSSE VALLEY AUTHORITY | |||
. M. Mills, nager Nuclear Licensing Enclosure cc (Enclosure): | |||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. | |||
20555 Mr. R. J. Clark j. | |||
Browns Ferry Project Manager t-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, Maryland _20814 s | |||
i I | |||
R307220155 830708 g\\ | |||
DR ADOCK 05 g | |||
- An Eaual Opportunity Employer | |||
r f | |||
l> | |||
ENCLOSURE REPORT OF INVESSEL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY IE BULLETIN 80-13 BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 In accordance with IE Bulletin 80-13, visual inspection of the core spray sparger and piping, internal to the unit 1 reactor vessel, was performed during a four-hour period on May 4,1983 The underwater camera system used for visual inspection was qualified by underwater viewing of a metallurgical sample with one-ril cracks. No abnormalities were found. | |||
Totsl exposure to the four individuals performing the inspection was 40 mrem. | |||
1 | |||
.d. | |||
I I | |||
I | |||
--..}} | |||
Latest revision as of 02:09, 15 December 2024
| ML20077A095 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Browns Ferry |
| Issue date: | 07/08/1983 |
| From: | Mills L TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| REF-SSINS-6820 IEB-80-13, NUDOCS 8307220155 | |
| Download: ML20077A095 (2) | |
Text
-.
s
- f Q
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CHATTANOOGA. TENNESSEE.374ot -
' 400 Chestnut Street Tower II July 8, 1983 U.S.1 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II-ATTN: _ James P.'O'Reilly, Regional Administrator
'101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND' ENFORCEMENT BULLETIN 80 RII:JPO 50-259, -260, -296 - BROWNS FERRY. NUCLEAR PLANT As required by IE Bulletin 80-13, a visual inspection of the core spray sparger and piping was performed on Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant
-unit 1 during the current rcrueling outags. The report required by the bulletic is enclosed.
7.f you have any questions, please call Jim Doser at FT3 858a2725.
To the best -of :ny knowledge, I declare the statements contained herein are comp 3ete and true.
Very truly yours, TENNZSSSE VALLEY AUTHORITY
. M. Mills, nager Nuclear Licensing Enclosure cc (Enclosure):
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.
20555 Mr. R. J. Clark j.
Browns Ferry Project Manager t-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, Maryland _20814 s
i I
R307220155 830708 g\\
DR ADOCK 05 g
- An Eaual Opportunity Employer
r f
l>
ENCLOSURE REPORT OF INVESSEL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY IE BULLETIN 80-13 BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 In accordance with IE Bulletin 80-13, visual inspection of the core spray sparger and piping, internal to the unit 1 reactor vessel, was performed during a four-hour period on May 4,1983 The underwater camera system used for visual inspection was qualified by underwater viewing of a metallurgical sample with one-ril cracks. No abnormalities were found.
Totsl exposure to the four individuals performing the inspection was 40 mrem.
1
.d.
I I
I
--..