ML19329A190: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 71: Line 71:
This is in response to your letter of December 13, 1971, wherein                          '
This is in response to your letter of December 13, 1971, wherein                          '
you requested comments on the draft environmental impact statement for the Oconee Nuclear Station Unit 1.
you requested comments on the draft environmental impact statement for the Oconee Nuclear Station Unit 1.
                                                                                                            ;
-                This Department has reviewed the health aspects of the above project l
-                This Department has reviewed the health aspects of the above project l
as presented in the documents submitted. This proposed nuclear generating station does not appear to represent a hazard to public health and safety. Moreover, it appears that any delay in such construction and operation could result in power shortages.with consequences prejudicial to the public health.
as presented in the documents submitted. This proposed nuclear generating station does not appear to represent a hazard to public health and safety. Moreover, it appears that any delay in such construction and operation could result in power shortages.with consequences prejudicial to the public health.

Latest revision as of 15:44, 18 February 2020

Comments on Des for Facility
ML19329A190
Person / Time
Site: Oconee Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/03/1972
From: Duval M
HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, DEPT. OF
To: Rogers L
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 7912300221
Download: ML19329A190 (2)


Text

~-

r.ch onTs er oocuuEuT: onTs ascovso woo.

Dept. et Esalth[ Bhsestian Ehlfare 2-3-72 MTa -

a

, g g, m 61R. - Em o. . REco=T: ornEar j

t Mar 11a E. B dal X T0: O R H3.; GG; OrH ER;

[ Iaster Bogers 1 1 Action NaCessaar O co~cuaaac O oaTr *~5=caso:

E

cussir

NC ACr10N NECES$ARY O comuc~T O ev:

rost oericE ricEcooc -

l U

DEscReprlON: (Must 80 Unclassets.d)

Rro uo. N (N N)

REFERRED TO DATE RECEIVED gy DATE

[ Ltr re our 12-13-71 ltr... furnishing J. G. Keppler 2-6-T2

? ocuments on the draft envircensental v/2 cys for ACTION

! statement for Oconee Nuclear Station, I mit A. . . _ n-:

-wci.osuREs:

u u.v 3.3,g m ,

t AEC PER l Caspliance (2)

Paultas M. Fitzpatrick i ___Derouna N. Dube 0 0 .M t

mj3% . . . '. ' '. . 0'18

"'"^^"*'

Schstencer ("f ?,' H i tj' ?" t'

_ Ih*na L a u . t. . . f.D E

j. (1 ey Local PCR - W=1h=11=, S.. C.} D13unno GT A-170 f 67g rht i

y u.s. Arouc ENEnov couurssion Mall CONTROL FORM roau AEcazas

@ U.S. GO V E R NMEN T PRIN tin G O F FIC E; .1971 d'.4 462 INI I

l i

i l

1 L l

I 7912300 M[

O

m -

l

,e  :- s.

DEPARTMENT OF HEAL.TH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE i '* 50>269

's . T ' WASHINGTON, D.C. 20201 _

0 &

OFFICE oF THE SECRETARY S F  %

- 6 .  %

~

T , 0 (.)

~

83 FEB8 1972* '

2 L1 ATouie smy Comuis!!ait Mr. Lester Rogers L. hamtwr

"* J Director p Division of Radiological and  %

Environmental Protection U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D. C. 20545

Dear Mr. Rogers:

This is in response to your letter of December 13, 1971, wherein '

you requested comments on the draft environmental impact statement for the Oconee Nuclear Station Unit 1.

- This Department has reviewed the health aspects of the above project l

as presented in the documents submitted. This proposed nuclear generating station does not appear to represent a hazard to public health and safety. Moreover, it appears that any delay in such construction and operation could result in power shortages.with consequences prejudicial to the public health.

Final documentation concerning this station should include infor-mation on actions to be initiated in the event of an accident ,

including notification of and participation with cognizant State l and local authorities. It should also describe arrangements for l the exchange of information and coordination with such authorities I

on routine environmental surveillance activities.

The opportunity to review the draft environmental impact statement I

is appreciated.

l l

Sincerely yours,

/ $ f Merlin K. DuVal, M.D.

Assistant Secretary for Health and Scientific Affairs 678 1

i