ML20010G254: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
vaavs.m.- , + . ani[@ | vaavs.m.- , + . ani[@ | ||
Nt:cLaam Oramarso m Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Serial No. 521 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation N0/WRM:acm Attn: Mr. Robert A. Clark, Chief Docket No. 50-339 Operating Reactors Branch No. 3 License No. NPF-7 Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Centlemen: | Nt:cLaam Oramarso m Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Serial No. 521 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation N0/WRM:acm Attn: Mr. Robert A. Clark, Chief Docket No. 50-339 Operating Reactors Branch No. 3 License No. NPF-7 Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Centlemen: | ||
AMENDMENT TO OPERATING LICENSE NPF-7 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNIT NO. 2 Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, the Virginia Electric and Power Company requests an amendment to Operating License NPF-7 for North Anna Power Station Unit No. 2. | AMENDMENT TO OPERATING LICENSE NPF-7 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNIT NO. 2 Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, the Virginia Electric and Power Company requests an amendment to Operating License NPF-7 for North Anna Power Station Unit No. 2. | ||
The proposed change to the Cperating License is enclosed. | The proposed change to the Cperating License is enclosed. | ||
Paragraph 2.C. (15) . (b) of the North Anna Unit 2 Operating License requires | Paragraph 2.C. (15) . (b) of the North Anna Unit 2 Operating License requires that Vepco install inspection ports in the steam generators prior to resuming operation following the first refueling outage. The proposed change to the | ||
that Vepco install inspection ports in the steam generators prior to resuming operation following the first refueling outage. The proposed change to the | |||
, Operating License is to delete this rec 2icement for the installation of steam generator inspection ports. The basis for the proposed change is provided in Attachment 1. | , Operating License is to delete this rec 2icement for the installation of steam generator inspection ports. The basis for the proposed change is provided in Attachment 1. | ||
This request has been reviewed by the Station Nuclear Safety and Operating Committ Se and by the Safety Evaluation and Control staff. It has been deter-mined that this request does not pose an unreviewed safety question. | This request has been reviewed by the Station Nuclear Safety and Operating Committ Se and by the Safety Evaluation and Control staff. It has been deter-mined that this request does not pose an unreviewed safety question. | ||
Line 65: | Line 62: | ||
: 1. To preclude first row tube leaks due to manufacturing defects or residual stress corrosion cracking, all first row tubes have been plugged in all | : 1. To preclude first row tube leaks due to manufacturing defects or residual stress corrosion cracking, all first row tubes have been plugged in all | ||
; three Steam Generators. This was done prior to Unit Start-Up. | ; three Steam Generators. This was done prior to Unit Start-Up. | ||
: 2. We have been carefully monitoring secondary chemistry parameters and have developed a restricted program of operations to ensure that appro-i priate plant evolutions (i.e., power reductions, shutdowns) are effected immediately following chemistry excursions. An increased awareness of l the sensitivity of the Steam Generator corrosion process to chemistry of | : 2. We have been carefully monitoring secondary chemistry parameters and have developed a restricted program of operations to ensure that appro-i priate plant evolutions (i.e., power reductions, shutdowns) are effected immediately following chemistry excursions. An increased awareness of l the sensitivity of the Steam Generator corrosion process to chemistry of the feedwater has resulted from our experience with Unit 1. | ||
the feedwater has resulted from our experience with Unit 1. | |||
Il 3. The monitoring of condenser in-leakage has also baen upgraded with the | Il 3. The monitoring of condenser in-leakage has also baen upgraded with the | ||
) | ) | ||
Line 83: | Line 78: | ||
l I | l I | ||
l | l | ||
} | } | ||
i ._ .}} | i ._ .}} |
Latest revision as of 09:14, 17 February 2020
ML20010G254 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | North Anna |
Issue date: | 09/11/1981 |
From: | Leasburg R VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) |
To: | Clark R, Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
521, NUDOCS 8109150490 | |
Download: ML20010G254 (4) | |
Text
_ ._. _ _ __ .__ _
sn 4 (o VINGINIA ELECTRIC ann POWEN COMPANY g gy3gy g H icn woxo, Vinaux A 20261 '
, ,,,g Q,,
pone nssus m
\
September 11, 1981
.....t.....,..
vaavs.m.- , + . ani[@
Nt:cLaam Oramarso m Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Serial No. 521 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation N0/WRM:acm Attn: Mr. Robert A. Clark, Chief Docket No. 50-339 Operating Reactors Branch No. 3 License No. NPF-7 Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Centlemen:
AMENDMENT TO OPERATING LICENSE NPF-7 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNIT NO. 2 Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, the Virginia Electric and Power Company requests an amendment to Operating License NPF-7 for North Anna Power Station Unit No. 2.
The proposed change to the Cperating License is enclosed.
Paragraph 2.C. (15) . (b) of the North Anna Unit 2 Operating License requires that Vepco install inspection ports in the steam generators prior to resuming operation following the first refueling outage. The proposed change to the
, Operating License is to delete this rec 2icement for the installation of steam generator inspection ports. The basis for the proposed change is provided in Attachment 1.
This request has been reviewed by the Station Nuclear Safety and Operating Committ Se and by the Safety Evaluation and Control staff. It has been deter-mined that this request does not pose an unreviewed safety question.
We have evaluated this request in accordance with the criteria in 10 CFR 1 170.22. Since this request involves a single safety issue which the Staff '
should be able to determine does not pose a significant hazards cor. sideration, a Class III license amendment fee is required. Accordingly, a voucher check in the amount of $4,000.00 is enclosed in payment of the required fee.
Very truly yours,
/
R. H. Leasburg Attachments: f
- 1. Discussion of Proposed Operating License Change A
- 2. Voucher check No. 43079 for $4,000.00 MDD cc: Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director 19 96 &
Office of Inspection and Enforcement $j Region II g
8109150490 810911 i PDR ADOCK 05000339 P PDR
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA )
)
CITY OF RICHMOND )
The foregoing document was acknowledged before me, in and for the City and Commonwealth aforesaid, today by R. H. Leasburg, who is Vice President-Nuclear Operations, of the "frginia Electric and Power Company. He is duly authorized to execute and file the foregoing document in behalf of that Company., and the statements in the document are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.
Acknowledged before me this // day of d '- , 19 h/ .
My Commission expires: 4-2A , 19 6.
( N#A.
Notary Public i
(SEAL)
l
. Pcgs 1 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION l
STEAM GENERATOR INSPECTION PORT LICENSE CONDITION On January 21, 1580, Mr. D. F. Ross, Jr. of the Office of Nuclear Reactor j
Regulation forwarded a letter to VEPCO stating his requirement that a
- commitment be made to install Steam Generator inspection ports at North Anna i
Power Station Unit 2 prior to the start of commercial operation. The Unit 2 license included a commitment that, prior to resuming power operation following the first refueling outage, inspection ports would be installed in the Steam Generators.
- Mr. Ross's reasoning for having the commitment made was based on a concert that the problem of the progression of tube denting was not being adequately i
addressed and preventative measures were not being developed. He concluded that to adequately monitor the progression of tube denting and to facilitate removal of selected tubes for laboratory analysis, the ports would be re-
! quired.
The precautionary measures taken on Unit 2 to date have included
- 1. To preclude first row tube leaks due to manufacturing defects or residual stress corrosion cracking, all first row tubes have been plugged in all
- three Steam Generators. This was done prior to Unit Start-Up.
- 2. We have been carefully monitoring secondary chemistry parameters and have developed a restricted program of operations to ensure that appro-i priate plant evolutions (i.e., power reductions, shutdowns) are effected immediately following chemistry excursions. An increased awareness of l the sensitivity of the Steam Generator corrosion process to chemistry of the feedwater has resulted from our experience with Unit 1.
Il 3. The monitoring of condenser in-leakage has also baen upgraded with the
)
utilization of sophisticated helium leak testing techniques to detect tube degradation.
- 4. A training program for POWDEX operators has been developed and imple-mented. This, along with proposed design changes and careful operation of the POWDEX units will eliminate this source of feedwater contamination.
Based on these factors VEPCO feels that it is prudent to reconsider our
, earlier intention to install Steam Generator inspection ports at North Anna Unit 2. No significant additional benefit from an operational or safety standpoint can be identified for installation of inspection ports. Instal-lation would result in additional personnel exposure (about 7.5 man-rem),
another penetration into a critical pressure vessel with the attendant risk of a steam-break accident, substantial expenditures of manpower and monetary resources.
I
, , . _ _ . , - . s - . . . + _ . ... .
Pcg2 2 We agree that, in the presence of severe denting, inspection ports are a l
valuable inspection tool. However, it should be recognized that alternative precautionary measures csn and have been taken which, in the light of current operating practices and policies, are more than adequate to preclude their necessity. VFPCO now feels that the safety implications of not installing the inspection ports are negligible, and it is requested that the license condition be removed.
l l
l I
l
}
i ._ .