ML17320B127: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:Florida Power
:-'I Orig. Ta ..:
                                                                                                  ~" loll Ccrtr):::: ~ ~ ~  ~ ~ ~
AI)ril          "
10, 1981 FJLI'::      3-0-3-e I/3-041-15 Hr . William 0.            Hiller, Chief i.icr-rrse Fee Management Dranch Of fice of Administrat,ion
  )J.S. )Iuclear Regulatory Commission t.'ashington, D.C. 20555
 
==References:==
Your      letter to        Dr. P. Y. I'nynard dated, January 30, 19P1 Your      letter to        Hr. W. P. Stewart dated February 12, 1981 Your    letter to        Dr. P. Y. Baynard dated Harch 24, 1981
 
==Subject:==
Crystal River Unit              3 Docket Ilo. 50-307 Facility Operal.inp l.iren c I!o. DPB-72 Technical Specification License Fees
 
==Dear Mr.        Hiller:==
 
Your      letters, referenced                    above, requested a<)i)i I;ional l i",.ense f r s zf Fl.>> i<l,".
Power      Corporation.                  The January          3A and Var.ch 2)r,              1q)r1 letter s          i )iii "-,'
                                                                                                                                  ~
Tecrrnical Specification Change Reques); t!o, 67 anr! )IBC approval of                                            th~"      >>-~ of I<UIIA-I) seal. material                  in hydraul ic ."rrrrbbers at Cr ys),:il River (~nit 3.                                Tire Fcbr.vary 12, 1981 letter addressed Technical Specification Change Bequests .62 and 6)l.
Florida        Power proposes              the following resolution                of these matters:
: 1)    PI)l)A-I) approval.                  While we corrcur that "...review and approvals...." <<rp subject to fees, we would )rave expected this to have bren wnivell v                                                  1
          ." tn f f on a discretionary                    basis.        <I >>ce Bvv i si on rl to Starry)'rr <I Tcc)>rr I nl        <
          .".pecificat.ions (IIVREG-0103) had <<)re ady ~ieBte<I this requirement a>>d since tire request wns necessitated by an un<irrly ir strii:tive license rtrprir emnir, we would strongly urpe waiver.                            I) >wr ver, wr will ac~)rriesce to your stater) position and for ward the $ 4000 Class 7.II fee.
: 2)    Tcchnical Specification Chan);e b. )nest 67.                                  We concur with your. Ii~sitxon and will forward the additional f7800 to arr ive at the Class III amount.
: 3)    Tr chnical            ."pecification          C)range  Pe  )west 62.        We  concur with your position and    will reduce            our remittance hy          '.<1200    accordingly.
Bi07i00027 Si0522 PDR ADOCK            05000302, P                                PDR g (graf 7l f Wll g t  ) t1 ~ ly    j $
                                                  ~  ~                      I )''I, ~
 
Nr. Milliam O. l1iller                      Page  2                              April 10, 1981
: 0)    Technical Specification Change Request 64.                  Me strongly disagree with the staff position.            Change  Request    6>l clearly resulted  from a Commission order (Confirmatory    Order on        Short Term Lessons Learned) and is therefore exempt from fees.      Furthermore,          if  any fee is applicable    it  should not be Class IV but rather Class II. Enclosure 2 to your July 12, 1979 letter clari-fying fee requirements states in part:
            "Examples of such (Class II) changes are:... (3) incorporation into the technical specification of any information that was reviewed and/
or approved        as  part of  a  prior action;..."
Florida Power respectfully submits that "Lessons Learned" was a prior ac-tion alreaady addressed in a specific SER, in numerous specific and gen-eral inspections and resulting reports, in IE Bulletins (79-05, et al), in NUREG-0578 (and its clarifications), in NUREG-0660, and in =NUREG-0737.
Florida    Power  Corporation is remitting herewith 45600 in accordance with the above.        If  further discussion is warranted, please contact this office.
Additionally, please refer all future correspondence regarding this docket to Hr. John A. Hancock, Assistant Vice President Nuclear Operations.
Very    truly yours, FLORIDA POMER CORPORATION
(  rl,c< )
            /
              '}
Patsy Y. Baynard p
P
                    ~ tg p i <p I t'.
Manager Nuclear Support Services Attachment jG)/ jl KMF( txa)
 
          ~ ~ s
~>e~ o 1')}}

Latest revision as of 06:22, 29 October 2019

Forwards License Fees for Tech Spec Change Requests 62,64 & 67,in Response to NRC 810130,0212 & 0324 Ltrs
ML17320B127
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/10/1981
From: Baynard P
FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To: Miller W
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
Shared Package
ML17320B126 List:
References
NUDOCS 8107100027
Download: ML17320B127 (3)


Text

Florida Power

-'I Orig. Ta ..:

~" loll Ccrtr):::: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

AI)ril "

10, 1981 FJLI':: 3-0-3-e I/3-041-15 Hr . William 0. Hiller, Chief i.icr-rrse Fee Management Dranch Of fice of Administrat,ion

)J.S. )Iuclear Regulatory Commission t.'ashington, D.C. 20555

References:

Your letter to Dr. P. Y. I'nynard dated, January 30, 19P1 Your letter to Hr. W. P. Stewart dated February 12, 1981 Your letter to Dr. P. Y. Baynard dated Harch 24, 1981

Subject:

Crystal River Unit 3 Docket Ilo. 50-307 Facility Operal.inp l.iren c I!o. DPB-72 Technical Specification License Fees

Dear Mr. Hiller:

Your letters, referenced above, requested a<)i)i I;ional l i",.ense f r s zf Fl.>> i<l,".

Power Corporation. The January 3A and Var.ch 2)r, 1q)r1 letter s i )iii "-,'

~

Tecrrnical Specification Change Reques); t!o, 67 anr! )IBC approval of th~" >>-~ of I<UIIA-I) seal. material in hydraul ic ."rrrrbbers at Cr ys),:il River (~nit 3. Tire Fcbr.vary 12, 1981 letter addressed Technical Specification Change Bequests .62 and 6)l.

Florida Power proposes the following resolution of these matters:

1) PI)l)A-I) approval. While we corrcur that "...review and approvals...." <<rp subject to fees, we would )rave expected this to have bren wnivell v 1

." tn f f on a discretionary basis. >ce Bvv i si on rl to Starry)'rr rr I nl <

.".pecificat.ions (IIVREG-0103) had <<)re ady ~ieBte>d since tire request wns necessitated by an un<irrly ir strii:tive license rtrprir emnir, we would strongly urpe waiver. I) >wr ver, wr will ac~)rriesce to your stater) position and for ward the $ 4000 Class 7.II fee.

2) Tcchnical Specification Chan);e b. )nest 67. We concur with your. Ii~sitxon and will forward the additional f7800 to arr ive at the Class III amount.
3) Tr chnical ."pecification C)range Pe )west 62. We concur with your position and will reduce our remittance hy '.<1200 accordingly.

Bi07i00027 Si0522 PDR ADOCK 05000302, P PDR g (graf 7l f Wll g t ) t1 ~ ly j $

~ ~ I )I, ~

Nr. Milliam O. l1iller Page 2 April 10, 1981

0) Technical Specification Change Request 64. Me strongly disagree with the staff position. Change Request 6>l clearly resulted from a Commission order (Confirmatory Order on Short Term Lessons Learned) and is therefore exempt from fees. Furthermore, if any fee is applicable it should not be Class IV but rather Class II. Enclosure 2 to your July 12, 1979 letter clari-fying fee requirements states in part:

"Examples of such (Class II) changes are:... (3) incorporation into the technical specification of any information that was reviewed and/

or approved as part of a prior action;..."

Florida Power respectfully submits that "Lessons Learned" was a prior ac-tion alreaady addressed in a specific SER, in numerous specific and gen-eral inspections and resulting reports, in IE Bulletins (79-05, et al), in NUREG-0578 (and its clarifications), in NUREG-0660, and in =NUREG-0737.

Florida Power Corporation is remitting herewith 45600 in accordance with the above. If further discussion is warranted, please contact this office.

Additionally, please refer all future correspondence regarding this docket to Hr. John A. Hancock, Assistant Vice President Nuclear Operations.

Very truly yours, FLORIDA POMER CORPORATION

( rl,c< )

/

'}

Patsy Y. Baynard p

P

~ tg p i

e~ o 1')