ML17228A965: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:PRIORI I Y Z REGULRTOR5 f&515QFYMSSDRhMETYON SYSTEM (RYDS)It ACCESSION NBR:9412280229 DOC.DATE: 94/12/20 NOTARIZED:
{{#Wiki_filter:PRIORI I Y               Z REGULRTOR5     f&515QFYMSSDRhMETYON             SYSTEM (RYDS)
NO FACIL:50-335 St.Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power&Light Co.~~~~~~AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION
It ACCESSION NBR:9412280229                   DOC.DATE:     94/12/20   NOTARIZED: NO           DOCKET  I FACIL:50-335 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power
'OLDBERG,J.H.
                            ~                                                  & Light   Co. 05000335 AUTH. NAME               AUTHOR AFFILIATION
Florida Power&Light Co.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)
    'OLDBERG,J.H.
    ~
                    ~  ~      Florida
                                    ~
Power & Light Co.
RECIP.NAME
              ~                RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document             Control Desk)


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Responds to violations noted in insp rept 50-335/94-22 per 10CFR2.201.Corrective actions:on 940830,normal electrical configuration establ,ished
Responds           to violations noted in insp rept 50-335/94-22 per                         P 10CFR2.201.Corrective actions:on 940830,normal electrical configuration establ,ished & lA EDG declared operable.                                 R DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE01D               COPIES RECEIVED:LTR             ENCL     SIZE:
&lA EDG declared operable.DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE01D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response NOTES: DOCKET I 05000335 P R 0 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-2 PD INTERNAL: ACRS AEOD/SPD/RAB AEOD/TTC~FXL1."CEMENTER 02 NRR/DRCH/HHFB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS3 ERNAL: LITCO BRYCEFJ H NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NORRIS,J AEOD/DEIB AEOD/SPD/RRAB DEDRO NRR/DORS/OEAB NRR/PMAS/IRCB-E OE DIR RGN2 FILE 01 NOAC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1'1 1 D 0 U M N iNOTE TO ALL"Rl DS" RECIPIEi~:
TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of                     Violation     Response NOTES:                                                                                               0 RECIPIENT             COPIES              RECIPIENT            COPIES ID CODE/NAME            LTTR ENCL          ID CODE/NAME         LTTR ENCL PD2-2 PD                     1      1      NORRIS,J                  1    1 INTERNAL: ACRS                               2      2      AEOD/DEIB                1    1 AEOD/SPD/RAB                 1      1      AEOD/SPD/RRAB            1    1 AEOD/TTC                     1      1      DEDRO                    1    1
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE iVASTE!COYTACT THE DOCL'MEi'T COYTROL DESK.ROOM PI-37 (EXT.SN-20S3)TO ELIM I YATE YOUR YAM E FROi!DIS'!'RIBL"I'IOY.
            ~FXL1."CEMENTER 02                 1      1      NRR/DORS/OEAB            1    1 NRR/DRCH/HHFB                 1      1      NRR/PMAS/IRCB-E          1    1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT               1      1      OE DIR                    1    1 OGC/HDS3                     1,      1      RGN2    FILE    01      1    1 ERNAL: LITCO BRYCEFJ H                 1       1     NOAC                    '1     1 NRC PDR                      1       1 D
LISTS FOR DOCUWIEYTS YOU DON"I 5 LED!TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 20 ENCL 20 Florida Powor 5 Light Company, P.O.Box 14000, Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 t FPL DEC 2 0 1990 L-94-314 10 CFR 2.201 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555 Re: St.Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 Florida Power and Light Company (FPL)has reviewed the subject inspection report and pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201 the response to the notice of violation is attached.Very truly yours, J.H.Goldberg President-Nuclear Division JHG/DAS/JWH Attachment cc: Stewart D.Ebneter, Regional Administrator, USNRC Region II Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St.Lucie Plant t 9412280229 94i220 PDR ADOCK 05000335 PDR an FPL Group company St.Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation'ns ection Re ort 94-22 VIOLATION A: 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Action, as implemented by approved FPL Topical Quality Assurance Report, TQR 16.0 revision 8,"Corrective Action," requires that measures be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality be promptly identified and corrected.
0 U
Contrary to the above, on August 29, 1994, the licensee's corrective action for a previous NRC violation were inadequate in that they failed to prevent operation of the unit with an electrical plant configuration for which Technical Specification required surveillance testing had not been performed.
M N
Specifically, the licensee was operating the IC Intake Cooling Water (ICW)Pump powered from the 1A Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG)bus while relying on the 1A EDG to be operable.However, load shed testing of the IC ICW Pump, while aligned to the 1A EDG bus, had not been performed as required by Technical Specifications (TSs)for EDG operability.
iNOTE TO ALL"Rl DS" RECIPIEi~:
The licensee had developed a Night Order to alert Unit 1 operators to the limitations of the subject electrical lineup.However, the Night Order failed to properly describe that the subject electrical lineup would result in the 1A EDG being inoperable.
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE iVASTE! COYTACTTHE DOCL'MEi'TCOYTROL DESK. ROOM PI -37 (EXT. SN-20S3 ) TO ELIMI YATE YOUR YAME FROi!
RESPONSE A: 1.REASON FOR VIOLATION The root cause for this violation was an inadequate technical review of the interim corrective action.2.CORRECTIVE STEPS TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED A.On August 29, 1994, the 1A EDG was declared inoperable due to an electrical plant configuration for which Technical Specification (TS)required surveillance testing had not been performed.
DIS'!'RIBL"I'IOY.LISTS FOR DOCUWIEYTS YOU DON"I 5 LED!
B.C.D~On August 30, 1994, the normal electrical configuration was established and the 1A EDG was declared operable.On August 31, 1994, a Night Order was issued.which specified the 1C ICW and 1C CCW pumps should not be aligned to the A side electrically until the TS required surveillance was completed..
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR                      20  ENCL      20
If it was required to place the plant in this configuration, then the 1A EDG was to be declared inoperable.
 
On September 28, 1994, engineering evaluation JPN-PSL-SEEP-94-051 concluded that the loading of the 1C ICW pump during the first (0 second)load block would not affect the ability of the EDG to perform its safety function and that all ESF loads would be able to start and accelerate.
t Florida Powor  5 Light Company, P.O. Box 14000, Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 FPL DEC 2 0 1990 L-94-314 10 CFR 2.201 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:       Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Re:    St. Lucie Unit        1 Docket No. 50-335 Reply to Notice of        Violation Ins ection        Re ort 94-22 Florida Power and Light Company                    (FPL) has reviewed the                      subject inspection report and pursuant to                10 CFR 2.201 the response                      to the notice of violation is attached.
After the third (6 second)load block the EDG would recover to the originally analyzed loading conditions.
Very    truly yours, J. H. Goldberg President  Nuclear Division JHG/DAS/JWH Attachment cc: Stewart D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, USNRC Region                                        II Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St. Lucie Plant t 9412280229 94i220 PDR    ADOCK 05000335 PDR an FPL Group company
St.Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 E.On November 30, 1994, all Technical Specification required testing associated with the Unit 1 electrical configuration in question was satisfactorily completed.
 
3.CORRECTIVE STEP TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS QI 16-PR/PSL-2,"St.Lucie Action Report (STAR)Program," has been changed to require a technical subcommittee review of Technical Specification non-compliance issues to ensure an adequate technical review is conducted and presented to the Facility Review Group (FRG).4, Full compliance was achieved on August 29, 1994 with the completion of Item 2A above.VIOLATION B: Unit 1 TS 6.8.l.a requires that written procedures shall be established and implemented covering the activities recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978.Appendix A, paragraph 1.h includes administrative procedures for log keeping.St.Lucie Administrative Procedure 0010120, revision 63,"Conduct of Operations," Appendix F,"Log Keeping," states that log entries are to be made in a chronological order and that, where this was not possible, entries are to be preceded by the words"Late Entry." Contrary to the above, on August 29, 1994, certain control room log entries were not made in a chronological order and also were not preceded by the words"Late Entry".A Unit 1 Assistant Nuclear Plant Supervisor modified and appended Unit 1 control room log entries made on a previous shift, and the modifications were not annotated in any way.This created a false impression of the activities of the previous shift.RESPONSE B: REASON FOR V10LATION The root cause for this violation was personnel error by Operations Department personnel.
St. Lucie Unit      1 Docket No. 50-335 Reply to Notice of ection      ort Violation'ns Re     94-22 VIOLATION A:
The individual failed to follow established plant procedures.
10   CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Action, as implemented by approved FPL Topical Quality Assurance Report, TQR 16.0 revision 8, "Corrective Action," requires that measures be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality be promptly identified and corrected.
2.CORRECTIVE STEPS TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED The chronological control room log was amended to correct the time of occurrence of the entry described above.3.CORRECT1VE STEPS TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS A.The individual involved was counseled by Operations Management.
Contrary to the above, on August 29, 1994, the licensee's corrective action for a previous NRC violation were inadequate in that they failed to prevent operation of the unit with an electrical plant configuration for which Technical Specification required      surveillance                testing had not been performed.
B., A Night Order was issued reiterating management' expectations regarding chronological log keeping.
Specifically, the licensee was operating the IC Intake Cooling Water (ICW) Pump powered from the 1A Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) bus while relying on the 1A EDG to be operable.                      However, load shed testing of the IC ICW Pump, while aligned to the 1A EDG bus, had not been performed as required by Technical Specifications (TSs) for EDG operability.                    The licensee had developed a Night Order to alert Unit 1 operators to the limitations of the subject electrical lineup. However, the Night Order failed to properly describe that the subject electrical lineup would result in the 1A EDG being inoperable.
t St~Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Repl'y to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 C.St.Lucie Administrative Procedure 0010120, Revision 63,"Conduct of Operations," Appendix F,"Log Keeping," has been revised to incorporate the practice of leaving no blank lines between entries or after a shift's log is complete.4.Full compliance was achieved on September 1, 1994 with the completion of Item 2 above.}}
RESPONSE    A:
: 1. REASON FOR VIOLATION The  root cause for this violation                was an inadequate technical review of the interim corrective action.
: 2. CORRECTIVE STEPS TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED A. On  August 29, 1994, the 1A               EDG was  declared inoperable due  to an electrical plant configuration for which Technical Specification (TS) required surveillance testing had not been performed.
B. On  August 30, 1994, the normal                electrical configuration was  established and the               1A EDG was  declared operable.
C. On August 31, 1994, a Night Order was issued .which specified the 1C ICW and 1C CCW pumps should not be aligned to the A side electrically until the TS required it surveillance was completed.. If was required to place the plant in this configuration, then the 1A EDG was to be declared inoperable.
D ~    On  September 28, 1994, engineering evaluation JPN-PSL-SEEP-94-051 concluded that the loading of the 1C ICW pump during the              first  (0 second) load block would not affect the ability of the EDG to perform its safety function and that all ESF loads would be able to start and accelerate.
After the third (6 second) load block the EDG would recover to the             originally  analyzed loading conditions.
 
St. Lucie Unit    1 Docket No. 50-335 Reply to Notice of    Violation Ins ection  Re ort  94-22 E. On  November 30, 1994,      all Technical Specification required testing associated with the Unit 1 electrical configuration in question was satisfactorily completed.
: 3. CORRECTIVE STEP TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS QI 16-PR/PSL-2,  "St. Lucie Action Report (STAR) Program," has been changed to    require a technical subcommittee review of Technical Specification non-compliance issues to ensure an adequate technical review is conducted and presented to the Facility  Review Group (FRG).
4,    Full compliance was achieved      on August  29, 1994  with the completion of Item 2A above.
VIOLATION B:
Unit 1 TS 6.8.l.a requires that written procedures shall be established and implemented covering the activities recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978.
Appendix A, paragraph 1.h includes administrative procedures for log keeping. St. Lucie Administrative Procedure 0010120, revision 63, "Conduct of Operations," Appendix F, "Log Keeping," states that log entries are to be made in a chronological order and that, where this was not possible, entries are to be preceded by the words "Late Entry."
Contrary to the above, on August 29, 1994, certain control room log entries were not made in a chronological order and also were not preceded by the words "Late Entry". A Unit 1 Assistant Nuclear Plant Supervisor modified and appended Unit 1 control room log entries made on a previous shift, and the modifications were not annotated in any way.        This created a false impression of the activities of the previous shift.
RESPONSE  B:
REASON FOR V10LATION The root cause for this violation was personnel        error by Operations Department personnel.       The individual  failed to follow established plant procedures.
: 2. CORRECTIVE STEPS TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED The  chronological control  room log was amended to correct the time of occurrence of the entry described above.
: 3. CORRECT1VE STEPS TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS A. The individual    involved  was counseled  by Operations Management.
B.,   A  Night Order was issued reiterating management' expectations regarding chronological log keeping.
 
t St Lucie Unit 1
  ~
Docket No. 50-335 Repl'y to Notice of   Violation Ins ection  Re  ort  94-22 C. St. Lucie Administrative Procedure 0010120, Revision 63, "Conduct of Operations," Appendix F, "Log Keeping," has been revised to incorporate the practice of leaving no blank lines between entries or after a shift's log is complete.
: 4. Full compliance was achieved on September   1, 1994 with the completion of Item 2 above.}}

Latest revision as of 21:07, 29 October 2019

Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-335/94-22 Per 10CFR2.201.Corrective Actions:On 940830,normal Electrical Configuration Established & 1A EDG Declared Operable
ML17228A965
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/20/1994
From: Goldberg J
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
L-94-314, NUDOCS 9412280229
Download: ML17228A965 (6)


Text

PRIORI I Y Z REGULRTOR5 f&515QFYMSSDRhMETYON SYSTEM (RYDS)

It ACCESSION NBR:9412280229 DOC.DATE: 94/12/20 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET I FACIL:50-335 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power

~ & Light Co. 05000335 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION

'OLDBERG,J.H.

~

~ ~ Florida

~

Power & Light Co.

RECIP.NAME

~ RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Responds to violations noted in insp rept 50-335/94-22 per P 10CFR2.201.Corrective actions:on 940830,normal electrical configuration establ,ished & lA EDG declared operable. R DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE01D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response NOTES: 0 RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD2-2 PD 1 1 NORRIS,J 1 1 INTERNAL: ACRS 2 2 AEOD/DEIB 1 1 AEOD/SPD/RAB 1 1 AEOD/SPD/RRAB 1 1 AEOD/TTC 1 1 DEDRO 1 1

~FXL1."CEMENTER 02 1 1 NRR/DORS/OEAB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HHFB 1 1 NRR/PMAS/IRCB-E 1 1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1 1 OE DIR 1 1 OGC/HDS3 1, 1 RGN2 FILE 01 1 1 ERNAL: LITCO BRYCEFJ H 1 1 NOAC '1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 D

0 U

M N

iNOTE TO ALL"Rl DS" RECIPIEi~:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE iVASTE! COYTACTTHE DOCL'MEi'TCOYTROL DESK. ROOM PI -37 (EXT. SN-20S3 ) TO ELIMI YATE YOUR YAME FROi!

DIS'!'RIBL"I'IOY.LISTS FOR DOCUWIEYTS YOU DON"I 5 LED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 20 ENCL 20

t Florida Powor 5 Light Company, P.O. Box 14000, Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 FPL DEC 2 0 1990 L-94-314 10 CFR 2.201 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Re: St. Lucie Unit 1 Docket No. 50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 Florida Power and Light Company (FPL) has reviewed the subject inspection report and pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201 the response to the notice of violation is attached.

Very truly yours, J. H. Goldberg President Nuclear Division JHG/DAS/JWH Attachment cc: Stewart D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, USNRC Region II Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St. Lucie Plant t 9412280229 94i220 PDR ADOCK 05000335 PDR an FPL Group company

St. Lucie Unit 1 Docket No. 50-335 Reply to Notice of ection ort Violation'ns Re 94-22 VIOLATION A:

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Action, as implemented by approved FPL Topical Quality Assurance Report, TQR 16.0 revision 8, "Corrective Action," requires that measures be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality be promptly identified and corrected.

Contrary to the above, on August 29, 1994, the licensee's corrective action for a previous NRC violation were inadequate in that they failed to prevent operation of the unit with an electrical plant configuration for which Technical Specification required surveillance testing had not been performed.

Specifically, the licensee was operating the IC Intake Cooling Water (ICW) Pump powered from the 1A Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) bus while relying on the 1A EDG to be operable. However, load shed testing of the IC ICW Pump, while aligned to the 1A EDG bus, had not been performed as required by Technical Specifications (TSs) for EDG operability. The licensee had developed a Night Order to alert Unit 1 operators to the limitations of the subject electrical lineup. However, the Night Order failed to properly describe that the subject electrical lineup would result in the 1A EDG being inoperable.

RESPONSE A:

1. REASON FOR VIOLATION The root cause for this violation was an inadequate technical review of the interim corrective action.
2. CORRECTIVE STEPS TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED A. On August 29, 1994, the 1A EDG was declared inoperable due to an electrical plant configuration for which Technical Specification (TS) required surveillance testing had not been performed.

B. On August 30, 1994, the normal electrical configuration was established and the 1A EDG was declared operable.

C. On August 31, 1994, a Night Order was issued .which specified the 1C ICW and 1C CCW pumps should not be aligned to the A side electrically until the TS required it surveillance was completed.. If was required to place the plant in this configuration, then the 1A EDG was to be declared inoperable.

D ~ On September 28, 1994, engineering evaluation JPN-PSL-SEEP-94-051 concluded that the loading of the 1C ICW pump during the first (0 second) load block would not affect the ability of the EDG to perform its safety function and that all ESF loads would be able to start and accelerate.

After the third (6 second) load block the EDG would recover to the originally analyzed loading conditions.

St. Lucie Unit 1 Docket No. 50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 E. On November 30, 1994, all Technical Specification required testing associated with the Unit 1 electrical configuration in question was satisfactorily completed.

3. CORRECTIVE STEP TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS QI 16-PR/PSL-2, "St. Lucie Action Report (STAR) Program," has been changed to require a technical subcommittee review of Technical Specification non-compliance issues to ensure an adequate technical review is conducted and presented to the Facility Review Group (FRG).

4, Full compliance was achieved on August 29, 1994 with the completion of Item 2A above.

VIOLATION B:

Unit 1 TS 6.8.l.a requires that written procedures shall be established and implemented covering the activities recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978.

Appendix A, paragraph 1.h includes administrative procedures for log keeping. St. Lucie Administrative Procedure 0010120, revision 63, "Conduct of Operations," Appendix F, "Log Keeping," states that log entries are to be made in a chronological order and that, where this was not possible, entries are to be preceded by the words "Late Entry."

Contrary to the above, on August 29, 1994, certain control room log entries were not made in a chronological order and also were not preceded by the words "Late Entry". A Unit 1 Assistant Nuclear Plant Supervisor modified and appended Unit 1 control room log entries made on a previous shift, and the modifications were not annotated in any way. This created a false impression of the activities of the previous shift.

RESPONSE B:

REASON FOR V10LATION The root cause for this violation was personnel error by Operations Department personnel. The individual failed to follow established plant procedures.

2. CORRECTIVE STEPS TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED The chronological control room log was amended to correct the time of occurrence of the entry described above.
3. CORRECT1VE STEPS TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS A. The individual involved was counseled by Operations Management.

B., A Night Order was issued reiterating management' expectations regarding chronological log keeping.

t St Lucie Unit 1

~

Docket No. 50-335 Repl'y to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 C. St. Lucie Administrative Procedure 0010120, Revision 63, "Conduct of Operations," Appendix F, "Log Keeping," has been revised to incorporate the practice of leaving no blank lines between entries or after a shift's log is complete.

4. Full compliance was achieved on September 1, 1994 with the completion of Item 2 above.