|
|
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| | issue date = 09/21/2012 | | | issue date = 09/21/2012 |
| | title = EA-12-152, Wolf Creek Generating Station, Final Significance Determination of Yellow Finding and Notice of Violation, NRC Inspection Report 05000482/2012010 | | | title = EA-12-152, Wolf Creek Generating Station, Final Significance Determination of Yellow Finding and Notice of Violation, NRC Inspection Report 05000482/2012010 |
| | author name = Collins E E | | | author name = Collins E |
| | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/ORA | | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/ORA |
| | addressee name = Sunseri M W | | | addressee name = Sunseri M |
| | addressee affiliation = Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp | | | addressee affiliation = Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp |
| | docket = 05000482 | | | docket = 05000482 |
| Line 19: |
Line 19: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION EA-12-152 Matthew W_ Sunseri , President and Chief Executive Officer REGION IV 1600 EAST LAMAR BLVD ARLINGTON , TEXAS 76011-4511 September 21 , 2012 Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation P.O. Box411 Burlington, KS 66839 | | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION |
|
| |
|
| SUBJECT: WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION -FINAL SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION OF YELLOW FINDING AND NOTICE OF V I OLAT I ON , NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000482/2012010 | | ==REGION IV== |
| | 1600 EAST LAMAR BLVD |
| | ==SUBJECT:== |
| | WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION - FINAL SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION OF YELLOW FINDING AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION, NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000482/2012010 |
|
| |
|
| ==Dear Mr. Sunseri:== | | ==Dear Mr. Sunseri:== |
| This letter provides you the final significance determination of the preliminary Yellow finding discussed in our previous communication dated August 6 , 2012, which included NRC Inspection Report 0500048212012009. | | This letter provides you the final significance determination of the preliminary Yellow finding discussed in our previous communication dated August 6, 2012, which included NRC Inspection Report 0500048212012009. The finding involved your staffs failure to provide adequate oversight of contractors while they performed work that could affect safety* related equipment in April 2011. As a result , your staff failed to identify that electrical maintenance contractors had not installed insulating sleeves on wires that affected the differential current protection circuit , |
| | contrary to work order instructions. This allowed an electrical short to prevent transfer of power to the startup transformer during a plant trip. |
|
| |
|
| The finding involved your staffs failure to provide adequate oversight of contractors while they performed work that could affect safety* related equipment in April 2011. As a result , your staff failed to identify that e l ectrical maintenance contractors had not installed insulating sleeves on wires that affected the different i al current protection circuit , contrary to work order instructions.
| | In a telephone conversation with Mr. Neil O'Keefe of NRC, Region IV, on August 15, 2012, Mr. Russell Smith of your staff indicated that Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation accepted the characterization of the risk significance of this finding , and that you declined your opportunity to discuss this issue in a Regulatory Conference or to provide a written response. |
|
| |
|
| This allowed an electrical short to prevent transfer of power to the startup transformer during a plant trip. In a telephone conversation with Mr. Neil O'Keefe o f NRC, Region IV , on August 15, 2012, Mr. Russell Smith of your staff indicated that Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation accepted the characterization of the risk significance of this finding , and that you declined your opportun i ty to discuss this issue in a Regulatory Conference or to provide a written response. After considering the information developed during the inspection , the NRC has concluded that the finding is appropriately characterized as Yellow , a finding with substantial safety significance.
| | After considering the information developed during the inspection, the NRC has concluded that the finding is appropriately characterized as Yellow, a finding with substantial safety significance. |
|
| |
|
| According to NRC Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, appeal rights apply only to those licensees that have either attended a regulatory conference or s ubmitted a written response to the preliminary determination letter. The NRC has also determ i ned that failure to provide adequate oversight of contractors while they performed work that could affect safety*related equipment in April 2011 is a violation of Wolf Creek Generating Station's Technical Specification 5.4.1 (a), as cited in the enclosed UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION EA-12-152 Matthew W_ Sunseri , President and Chief Executive Officer REGION IV 1600 EAST LAMAR BLVD ARLINGTON , TEXAS 76011-4511 September 21 , 2012 Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation P.O. Box411 Burlington, KS 66839 | | According to NRC Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, appeal rights apply only to those licensees that have either attended a regulatory conference or submitted a written response to the preliminary determination letter. |
|
| |
|
| SUBJECT: WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION -FINAL SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION OF YELLOW FINDING AND NOTICE OF V I OLAT I ON , NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000482/2012010
| | The NRC has also determined that failure to provide adequate oversight of contractors while they performed work that could affect safety*related equipment in April 2011 is a violation of Wolf Creek Generating Station's Technical Specification 5.4.1(a), as cited in the enclosed |
|
| |
|
| ==Dear Mr. Sunseri:==
| | Matthew Notice of Violation (Notice). The circumstances surrounding the violation were described in detail in the subject inspection report. In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, the Notice is considered escalated enforcement action because it is associated with a Yellow finding . |
| This letter provides you the final significance determination of the preliminary Yellow finding discussed in our previous communication dated August 6 , 2012, which included NRC Inspection Report 0500048212012009.
| | You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response . If you have additional information that you believe the NRC should consider, you may provide it in your response to the Notice. The NRC review of your response to the Notice will also determine whether further enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. |
| | |
| The finding involved your staffs failure to provide adequate oversight of contractors while they performed work that could affect safety* related equipment in April 2011. As a result , your staff failed to identify that e l ectrical maintenance contractors had not installed insulating sleeves on wires that affected the different i al current protection circuit , contrary to work order instructions.
| |
| | |
| This allowed an electrical short to prevent transfer of power to the startup transformer during a plant trip. In a telephone conversation with Mr. Neil O'Keefe o f NRC, Region IV , on August 15, 2012, Mr. Russell Smith of your staff indicated that Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation accepted the characterization of the risk significance of this finding , and that you declined your opportun i ty to discuss this issue in a Regulatory Conference or to provide a written response. After considering the information developed during the inspection , the NRC has concluded that the finding is appropriately characterized as Yellow , a finding with substantial safety significance.
| |
| | |
| According to NRC Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, appeal rights apply only to those licensees that have either attended a regulatory conference or s ubmitted a written response to the preliminary determination letter. The NRC has also determ i ned that failure to provide adequate oversight of contractors while they performed work that could affect safety*related equipment in April 2011 is a violation of Wolf Creek Generating Station's Technical Specification 5.4.1 (a), as cited in the enclosed Matthew Notice of Violation (No tice). The circumstances surrounding the violation were described in detail in the subject inspection report. I n accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy , the Notice is considered escalated enforcement action because it is associated with a Yellow finding. You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions spec ified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response. If you have additional information that you believe the NRC should consider, you may provide it in your response to the Notice. The NRC review of your response to the Notice will also determine whether further enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.
| |
| | |
| Because plant performance for this issue has been determined to be beyond the licensee response band, we will use the NRC's Action Matrix to determine the most appropriate NRC response for this event. We will notify you, by separate corresponde n ce, of that determination. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice ," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/readinq-rm/adams
| |
| .htm l. To the extent possible , your response should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made available to the Public without redaction. Docket: 50-482 License: NPF-42 Enclosure:
| |
| Notice of Violation cc w/encl: Electronic Distribution Elmo E. Co llin s Regional Administrator Matthew Notice of Violation (No tice). The circumstances surrounding the violation were described in detail in the subject inspection report. I n accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy , the Notice is considered escalated enforcement action because it is associated with a Yellow finding. You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions spec ified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response. If you have additional information that you believe the NRC should consider, you may provide it in your response to the Notice. The NRC review of your response to the Notice will also determine whether further enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.
| |
| | |
| Because plant performance for this issue has been determined to be beyond the licensee response band, we will use the NRC's Action Matrix to determine the most appropriate NRC response for this event. We will notify you, by separate corresponde n ce, of that determination. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice ," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/readinq-rm/adams
| |
| .htm l. To the extent possible , your response should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made available to the Public without redaction. Docket: 50-482 License: NPF-42 Enclosure:
| |
| Notice of Violation cc w/encl: Electronic Distribution Elmo E. Co llin s Regional Administrator NOTICE OF VIOLAT I ON Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Wolf Creek Generating Station Docket: 50-482 License: NPF-42 EA-12-152 During an NRC inspection conducted from May 21 to August 6 , 2012 , one violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, the vio l ation is listed below: Technical Specification 5.4.1(a), u Procedures
| |
| ," requires that written procedures be established , implemented , and maintained covering the applicable procedures recommended in Regulatory Guide 1.33 , Revision 2 , Appendix A , February 1978. Regulatory Guide 1.33 , u Quality Assurance Program Requirements ,n Appendix A , Section 9.a, specifies maintenance that can affect the performance of safety-related equipment should be properly pre-planned and performed in accordance with written procedures , documented instructions , or drawings appropriate to the circumstances.
| |
| | |
| Work Order 11-240360-006 , Revision 3 , required installation of insulation sleeves over each wire splice on current transformer wires in the startup transformer B phase protective relay circuit, as part of the implementation of the external wiring connection procedure.
| |
|
| |
|
| Contrary to the above , between April 16 and 27 , 2011 , maintenance that affected related equipment was not imp l emented in accordance with written procedures. Specifically , the electrical penetration sea l and wiring assembly associated with the H1JCT4 and H2 J CT5 current transformers installed in the startup transformer B phase protective relay circuit (XMR01) were rep l aced without insulating two of the splices , as required by Work Order 11-240360-006 , Revision 3. On January 13 , 2012 , the startup transfonner experienced a trip and lockout dur i ng a plant trip because the two un insulated wires touched and provided a false high phase differential Signal to the protective re l aying circuit. The protective lockout caused a prolonged loss of offsite power to all Train B equipment and all non-safety related buses. This violation is associated with a Yellow significance determination process finding. Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201 , Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, A TIN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001 wi th a copy to the Regional Administrator , Region IV , and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the Wolf Creek Generating Station , within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation.
| | Because plant performance for this issue has been determined to be beyond the licensee response band, we will use the NRC's Action Matrix to determine the most appropriate NRC response for this event. We will notify you, by separate correspondence, of that determination. |
|
| |
|
| This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation; EA-12-1 52" and should include: (1) the reason for the violation , or , if contested , the basis for disputing the violation , (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
| | In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's document system (ADAMS) , accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/readinq-rm/adams.html. To the extent possible, your response should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made available to the Public without redaction . |
| | Elmo E. Collin s Regional Administrator Docket: 50-482 License: NPF-42 Enclosure: Notice of Violation cc w/encl: Electronic Distribution |
|
| |
|
| -1-Enclosure NOTICE OF VIOLAT I ON Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Wolf Creek Generating Station Docket: 50-482 License: NPF-42 EA-12-152 During an NRC inspection conducted from May 21 to August 6 , 2012 , one violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, the vio l ation is listed below: Technical Specification 5.4.1(a), u Procedures
| | NOTICE OF VIOLATION Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Docket: 50-482 Wolf Creek Generating Station License : NPF-42 EA-12-152 During an NRC inspection conducted from May 21 to August 6 , 2012 , one violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, the violation is listed below: |
| ," requires that written procedures be established , implemented , and maintained covering the applicable procedures recommended in Regulatory Guide 1.33 , Revision 2 , Appendix A , February 1978. Regulatory Guide 1.33 , u Quality Assurance Program Requirements ,n Appendix A , Section 9.a, specifies maintenance that can affect the performance of safety-related equipment should be properly pre-planned and performed in accordance with written procedures , documented instructions , or drawings appropriate to the circumstances. | | Technical Specification 5.4.1(a), uProcedures," requires that written procedures be established , implemented, and maintained covering the applicable procedures recommended in Regulatory Guide 1.33 , Revision 2, Appendix A , February 1978. |
|
| |
|
| Work Order 11-240360-006 , Revision 3 , required installation of insulation sleeves over each wire splice on current transformer wires in the startup transformer B phase protective relay circuit, as part of the implementation of the external wiring connection procedure.
| | Regulatory Guide 1.33 , uQuality Assurance Program Requirements ,n Appendix A , |
| | Section 9.a, specifies maintenance that can affect the performance of safety-related equipment should be properly pre-planned and performed in accordance with written procedures, documented instructions, or drawings appropriate to the circumstances. |
|
| |
|
| Contrary to the above , between April 16 and 27 , 2011 , maintenance that affected related equipment was not imp l emented in accordance with written procedures. Specifically , the electrical penetration sea l and wiring assembly associated with the H1JCT4 and H2 J CT5 current transformers installed in the startup transformer B phase protective relay circuit (XMR01) were rep l aced without insulating two of the splices , as required by Work Order 11-240360-006 , Revision 3. On January 13 , 2012 , the startup transfonner experienced a trip and lockout dur i ng a plant trip because the two un insulated wires touched and provided a false high phase differential Signal to the protective re l aying circuit. The protective lockout caused a prolonged loss of offsite power to all Train B equipment and all non-safety related buses. This violation is associated with a Yellow significance determination process finding. Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201 , Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, A TIN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001 wi th a copy to the Regional Administrator , Region IV , and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the Wolf Creek Generating Station , within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation.
| | Work Order 11-240360-006, Revision 3, required installation of insulation sleeves over each wire splice on current transformer wires in the startup transformer B phase protective relay circuit, as part of the implementation of the external wiring connection procedure. |
|
| |
|
| This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation; EA-12-1 52" and should include: (1) the reason for the violation , or , if contested , the basis for disputing the violation , (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
| | Contrary to the above , between April 16 and 27 , 2011 , maintenance that affected safety-related equipment was not implemented in accordance with written procedures . |
| | Specifically , the electrical penetration sea l and wiring assembly associated with the H1JCT4 and H2JCT5 current transformers installed in the startup transformer B phase protective relay circuit (XMR01) were replaced without insulating two of the splices , as required by Work Order 11-240360-006, Revision 3 . On January 13, 2012, the startup transfonner experienced a trip and lockout during a plant trip because the two un insulated wires touched and provided a false high phase differential Signal to the protective relaying circuit. The protective lockout caused a prolonged loss of offsite power to all Train B equipment and all non-safety related buses. |
|
| |
|
| -1-Enclosure Your response may reference or include previous docketed correspondence , if the correspondence adequately addresses the required response. | | This violation is associated with a Yellow significance determination process finding . |
| | Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201 , Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, A TIN : Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region IV, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the Wolf Creek Generating Station , within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation. |
|
| |
|
| If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended , or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown , consideration will be given to extending the response time. If you contest this enforcement action , you should also provide a copy of your response, with the basis for your denial , to the Director, Office of Enforcement , United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Wash i ngton , DC 20555-0001. Because your response will be made available electron i cally for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room orfrom the NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Website at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. to the extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary , or safeguards information so that it can be made available to the public without redaction.
| | This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation; EA-12-1 52" and should include: (1) the reason for the violation , or, if contested , the basis for disputing the violation , |
| | (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. |
|
| |
|
| If personal privacy or proprietary information is necessary to provide an acceptable response , then please provide a bracketed copy of your response that identifies the information that should be protected and a redacted copy of your response that deletes such information. If you request withholding of such material, you must specifically identify the portions of your response that you seek to have withheld and provide in detail the bases for your claim of withholding (e.g., explain why the disclosure of information will create an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy or provide the information required by 10 CFR 2.390(b) to support a request for withholding confidential commercial or financial information).
| | -1- Enclosure |
|
| |
|
| If safeguards i nformation is necessary to provide an acceptable response , please provide the leve l of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. In accordance with 10 CFR 19.11 , you may be required to post this Notice within 2 working days of receipt. Dated this 21st day of August 2012 -2-Enclosure Your response may reference or include previous docketed correspondence , if the correspondence adequately addresses the required response.
| | Your response may reference or include previous docketed correspondence , if the correspondence adequately addresses the required response. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended , or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown , consideration will be given to extending the response time. |
|
| |
|
| If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended , or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown , consideration will be given to extending the response time. If you contest this enforcement action , you should also provide a copy of your response, with the basis for your denial , to the Director, Office of Enforcement , United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Wash i ngton , DC 20555-0001. Because your response will be made available electron i cally for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room orfrom the NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Website at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. to the extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary , or safeguards information so that it can be made available to the public without redaction.
| | If you contest this enforcement action , you should also provide a copy of your response, with the basis for your denial, to the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Wash ington, DC 20555-0001 . |
| | Because your response will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room orfrom the NRC 's document system (ADAMS) , accessible from the NRC Website at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html . to the extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made available to the public without redaction. |
|
| |
|
| If personal privacy or proprietary information is necessary to provide an acceptable response , then please provide a bracketed copy of your response that identifies the information that should be protected and a redacted copy of your response that deletes such information. If you request withholding of such material, you must specifically identify the portions of your response that you seek to have withheld and provide in detail the bases for your claim of withholding (e.g., explain why the disclosure of information will create an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy or provide the information required by 10 CFR 2.390(b) to support a request for withholding confidential commercial or financial information). | | If personal privacy or proprietary information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, then please provide a bracketed copy of your response that identifies the information that should be protected and a redacted copy of your response that deletes such information. If you request withholding of such material, you must specifically identify the portions of your response that you seek to have withheld and provide in detail the bases for your claim of withholding (e.g. , |
| | explain why the disclosure of information will create an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy or provide the information required by 10 CFR 2.390(b) to support a request for withholding confidential commercial or financial information). If safeguards information is necessary to provide an acceptable response , please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21 . |
| | In accordance with 10 CFR 19.11 , you may be required to post this Notice within 2 working days of receipt. |
|
| |
|
| If safeguards i nformation is necessary to provide an acceptable response , please provide the leve l of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. In accordance with 10 CFR 19.11 , you may be required to post this Notice within 2 working days of receipt. Dated this 21st day of August 2012 -2-Enclosure
| | Dated this 21st day of August 2012-2- Enclosure |
| }} | | }} |
|
|---|
Category:Letter
MONTHYEARIR 05000482/20244202024-10-31031 October 2024
Security Baseline Inspection Report 05000482/2024420
ML24296B1902024-10-22022 October 2024
10 CFR 50.55a Requests for the Fifth Ten-Year Interval Inservice Testing Program
05000482/LER-2024-001-01, Mode 3 Entry with One Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Train Inoperable Due to Missed Post-Maintenance Testing2024-10-22022 October 2024
Mode 3 Entry with One Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Train Inoperable Due to Missed Post-Maintenance Testing
05000482/LER-2024-002, Technical Specification Required Shutdown Due to Inoperable Auxiliary Feedwater Discharge Valve2024-10-21021 October 2024
Technical Specification Required Shutdown Due to Inoperable Auxiliary Feedwater Discharge Valve
ML24284A2842024-10-10010 October 2024
(Wcgs), Revision of One Form That Implements the Radiological Emergency Response Plan (RERP)
ML24283A0752024-10-0909 October 2024
Notification of Commercial Grade Dedication Inspection (05000482/2025012) and Request for Information
ML24199A1712024-09-17017 September 2024
Issuance of Amendment No. 241 Revise Ventilation Filter Testing Program Criteria and Administrative Correction of Absorber in Technical Specification 5.5.11
ML24260A0712024-09-12012 September 2024
License Amendment Request for a Risk-Informed Resolution to GSI-191
IR 05000482/20240102024-09-10010 September 2024
Biennial Problem Identification and Resolution Inspection Report 05000482/2024010 (Public)
ML24255A8642024-09-0606 September 2024
Rscc Wire & Cable LLC Dba Marmon Industrial Energy & Infrastructure - Part 21 Retraction of Final Notification
ML24248A0762024-09-0404 September 2024
Containment Inservice Inspection Program Third Interval, Second Period, Refueling Outage 26 Owner’S Activity Report
ML24248A2492024-09-0404 September 2024
Inservice Inspection Program Fourth Interval, Third Period, Refueling Outage 26 Owner’S Activity Report
ML24241A2212024-08-29029 August 2024
Notice of Enforcement Discretion for Wolf Creek Generating Station
ML24240A2642024-08-27027 August 2024
Corporation - Request for Notice of Enforcement Discretion Regarding Technical Specification 3.7.5, Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) System
ML24239A3972024-08-23023 August 2024
Rssc Wire & Cable LLC Dba Marmon - Part 21 Final Notification - 57243-EN 57243
IR 05000482/20240052024-08-14014 August 2024
Updated Inspection Plan for Wolf Creek Generating Station (Report 05000482/2024005)
ML24227A5562024-08-14014 August 2024
Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-569-A, Revision 2, Revision of Response Time Testing Definitions
ML24213A3352024-07-31031 July 2024
License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.2.1, Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor (Fq(Z)) (Fq Methodology), to Implement the Methodology from WCAP-17661-P-A, Revision 1.
ML24206A1252024-07-24024 July 2024
Revision of Three Procedures and Two Forms That Implement the Radiological Emergency Response Plan (RERP)
IR 05000482/20240022024-07-18018 July 2024
Integrated Inspection Report 05000482/2024002
05000482/LER-2024-001, Mode 3 Entry with One Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Train Inoperable Due to Missed Post-Maintenance Testing2024-07-0202 July 2024
Mode 3 Entry with One Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Train Inoperable Due to Missed Post-Maintenance Testing
IR 05000482/20244012024-07-0202 July 2024
Security Baseline Inspection Report 05000482/2024401
ML24178A3672024-06-26026 June 2024
Correction to 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report – Report 47
ML24178A4142024-06-26026 June 2024
Revision of One Procedure and One Form That Implement the Radiological Emergency Response Plan (RERP)
ML24162A1632024-06-11011 June 2024
Operating Corporation – Notification of Biennial Problem Identification and Resolution Inspection and Request for Information (05000482/2024010)
ML24150A0562024-05-29029 May 2024
Foreign Ownership, Control or Influence (FOCI) Information – Change to Lists of Owners, Officers, Directors and Executive Personnel - Form 405F Amendment
ML23345A1602024-05-0909 May 2024
Revision of Safety Evaluation for Amendment No. 237 Request for Deviation from Fire Protection Requirements
ML24089A2622024-04-29029 April 2024
Financial Protection Levels
ML24118A0022024-04-27027 April 2024
Wolf Generating Nuclear Station - 2023 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report
ML24118A0032024-04-27027 April 2024
2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report - Report 47
ML24113A1882024-04-19019 April 2024
Foreign Ownership, Control or Influence Information - Change to Lists of Owners, Officers, Directors and Executive Personnel - Form 405F Amendment
ML24109A1842024-04-18018 April 2024
Cycle 27 Core Operating Limits Report
ML24109A1212024-04-18018 April 2024
(WCGS) Form 5 Exposure Report for Calendar Year 2023
IR 05000482/20240012024-04-17017 April 2024
Integrated Inspection Report 05000482/2024001
ML24114A1442024-04-15015 April 2024
Redacted Updated Safety Analysis Report (WCGS Usar), Revision 37
ML24106A1482024-04-15015 April 2024
Notification of Inspection (NRC Inspection Report 05000482/2024003) and Request for Information
ML24098A0052024-04-0707 April 2024
2023 Annual Environmental Operating Report
ML24089A0972024-03-29029 March 2024
Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2024-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations
ML24089A1352024-03-29029 March 2024
10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report of Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) Evaluation Model Changes
ML24074A3312024-03-14014 March 2024
Missed Quarterly Inspection Per 40 CFR 266 Subpart N
IR 05000482/20240122024-03-11011 March 2024
Fire Protection Team Inspection Report 05000482/2024012
ML24080A3452024-03-11011 March 2024
7 of the Wolf Creek Generating Station Updated Safety Analysis Report
ML24016A0702024-03-0808 March 2024
Issuance of Amendment No. 240 Removal of the Power Range Neutron Flux Rate - High Negative Rate Trip Function from Technical Specifications
ML24068A1992024-03-0707 March 2024
Changes to Technical Specification Bases - Revisions 93 and 94
ML24066A0672024-03-0505 March 2024
4-2022-024 Letter - OI Closure to Licensee
ML24061A2642024-03-0101 March 2024
Revision of Two Procedures That Implement the Radiological Emergency Response Plan (RERP) for Wolf Creek Generating Station (WCGS) Commissioners
IR 05000482/20230062024-02-28028 February 2024
Annual Assessment Letter for Wolf Creek Generating Station Report 05000482/2023006
ML24059A1702024-02-28028 February 2024
Annual Fitness for Duty Program Performance Report, and Annual Fatigue Report for 2023
ML24026A0212024-02-27027 February 2024
Issuance of Amendment No. 239 Modified Implementation Date of License Amendment No. 238
ML24050A0012024-02-19019 February 2024
(Wcgs), Revision of One Form That Implements the Radiological Emergency Response Plan (RERP)
2024-09-06
[Table view]
Category:Notice of Violation
MONTHYEARML16162A7252016-06-0909 June 2016
Notice of Violation and NRC Investigation Report 4-2014-048
IR 05000482/20150042016-02-11011 February 2016
NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000482/2015004 and Notice of Violation
ML16043A0542016-02-11011 February 2016
NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000482/2015004 and Notice of Violation
IR 05000482/20150112016-01-27027 January 2016
EA-15-170 - Wolf Creek Generating Station; Notice of Violation; Severity Level III Problem - NRC Inspection Report 05000482/2015011
IR 05000482/20145032014-07-0101 July 2014
EA-14-024 - Wolf Creek Generating Station - Final Significance Determination of White Finding and Notice of Violation; NRC Inspection Report 05000482/2014503
IR 05000482/20120102012-09-21021 September 2012
EA-12-152, Wolf Creek Generating Station, Final Significance Determination of Yellow Finding and Notice of Violation, NRC Inspection Report 05000482/2012010
ML12191A2692012-07-0505 July 2012
IR 05000482-12-006, on May 7, 2012 & May 24, 2012, Wolf Creek Biennial Baseline Inspection of the Identification and Resolution of Problems.
IR 05000482/20110032011-08-12012 August 2011
IR 05000482-11-003 & Notice of Violation, on 04/1/2011 6/30/2011, Wolf Creek Generating Station, Integrated Resident Report, Adverse Weather Protection, Equipment Alignments, Inservice Inspection Activities, Post Maintenance Testing, Event
ML1122402232011-08-12012 August 2011
IR 05000482-11-003 & Notice of Violation, on 04/1/2011 6/30/2011, Wolf Creek Generating Station, Integrated Resident Report, Adverse Weather Protection, Equipment Alignments, Inservice Inspection Activities, Post Maintenance Testing, Event
ML1025602582010-09-13013 September 2010
IR 05000482-10-006; February 16, 2008, Through July 30, 2010: Wolf Creek Generating Station, Biennial Baseline Inspection of the Identification and Resolution of Problems
IR 05000482/20090052010-02-11011 February 2010
IR 05000482-09-005, on 10/01/2009 - 12/31/2009; Wolf Creek Generating Station, Integrated Resident and Regional Report; Fire Protection, Inservice Inspection Activities; Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Controls
ML1004307132010-02-11011 February 2010
IR 05000482-09-005, on 10/01/2009 - 12/31/2009; Wolf Creek Generating Station, Integrated Resident and Regional Report; Fire Protection, Inservice Inspection Activities; Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Controls
ML0913400612009-05-13013 May 2009
IR 05000482-09-002, on 1/01 - 3/31/2009; Wolf Creek Generating Plant, Integrated Resident and Regional Report; Adverse Weather, Fire Protection, Maintenance Effectiveness, Surveillance Testing, Problem Identification and Resolution, Other A
2016-06-09
[Table view]
Category:Enforcement Action
MONTHYEARML18333A0432018-12-17017 December 2018
EA-18-037, Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation - Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty - $232,000 (Office of Investigations Report No. 4-2017-020)
IR 05000482/20174052017-03-29029 March 2017
Final Significance Determination for a Security-Related Green Finding; NRC Security Inspection Report 05000482/2017405 (Letter Without Enclosure)
IR 05000482/20120102012-09-21021 September 2012
EA-12-152, Wolf Creek Generating Station, Final Significance Determination of Yellow Finding and Notice of Violation, NRC Inspection Report 05000482/2012010
ML1029404632010-10-21021 October 2010
Response to Notice of Violation and NRC Inspection Report 05000482/2010006, Acknowledgment Letter
2018-12-17
[Table view] |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION IV
1600 EAST LAMAR BLVD
SUBJECT:
WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION - FINAL SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION OF YELLOW FINDING AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION, NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000482/2012010
Dear Mr. Sunseri:
This letter provides you the final significance determination of the preliminary Yellow finding discussed in our previous communication dated August 6, 2012, which included NRC Inspection Report 0500048212012009. The finding involved your staffs failure to provide adequate oversight of contractors while they performed work that could affect safety* related equipment in April 2011. As a result , your staff failed to identify that electrical maintenance contractors had not installed insulating sleeves on wires that affected the differential current protection circuit ,
contrary to work order instructions. This allowed an electrical short to prevent transfer of power to the startup transformer during a plant trip.
In a telephone conversation with Mr. Neil O'Keefe of NRC, Region IV, on August 15, 2012, Mr. Russell Smith of your staff indicated that Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation accepted the characterization of the risk significance of this finding , and that you declined your opportunity to discuss this issue in a Regulatory Conference or to provide a written response.
After considering the information developed during the inspection, the NRC has concluded that the finding is appropriately characterized as Yellow, a finding with substantial safety significance.
According to NRC Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, appeal rights apply only to those licensees that have either attended a regulatory conference or submitted a written response to the preliminary determination letter.
The NRC has also determined that failure to provide adequate oversight of contractors while they performed work that could affect safety*related equipment in April 2011 is a violation of Wolf Creek Generating Station's Technical Specification 5.4.1(a), as cited in the enclosed
Matthew Notice of Violation (Notice). The circumstances surrounding the violation were described in detail in the subject inspection report. In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, the Notice is considered escalated enforcement action because it is associated with a Yellow finding .
You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response . If you have additional information that you believe the NRC should consider, you may provide it in your response to the Notice. The NRC review of your response to the Notice will also determine whether further enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.
Because plant performance for this issue has been determined to be beyond the licensee response band, we will use the NRC's Action Matrix to determine the most appropriate NRC response for this event. We will notify you, by separate correspondence, of that determination.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's document system (ADAMS) , accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/readinq-rm/adams.html. To the extent possible, your response should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made available to the Public without redaction .
Elmo E. Collin s Regional Administrator Docket: 50-482 License: NPF-42 Enclosure: Notice of Violation cc w/encl: Electronic Distribution
NOTICE OF VIOLATION Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Docket: 50-482 Wolf Creek Generating Station License : NPF-42 EA-12-152 During an NRC inspection conducted from May 21 to August 6 , 2012 , one violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy, the violation is listed below:
Technical Specification 5.4.1(a), uProcedures," requires that written procedures be established , implemented, and maintained covering the applicable procedures recommended in Regulatory Guide 1.33 , Revision 2, Appendix A , February 1978.
Regulatory Guide 1.33 , uQuality Assurance Program Requirements ,n Appendix A ,
Section 9.a, specifies maintenance that can affect the performance of safety-related equipment should be properly pre-planned and performed in accordance with written procedures, documented instructions, or drawings appropriate to the circumstances.
Work Order 11-240360-006, Revision 3, required installation of insulation sleeves over each wire splice on current transformer wires in the startup transformer B phase protective relay circuit, as part of the implementation of the external wiring connection procedure.
Contrary to the above , between April 16 and 27 , 2011 , maintenance that affected safety-related equipment was not implemented in accordance with written procedures .
Specifically , the electrical penetration sea l and wiring assembly associated with the H1JCT4 and H2JCT5 current transformers installed in the startup transformer B phase protective relay circuit (XMR01) were replaced without insulating two of the splices , as required by Work Order 11-240360-006, Revision 3 . On January 13, 2012, the startup transfonner experienced a trip and lockout during a plant trip because the two un insulated wires touched and provided a false high phase differential Signal to the protective relaying circuit. The protective lockout caused a prolonged loss of offsite power to all Train B equipment and all non-safety related buses.
This violation is associated with a Yellow significance determination process finding .
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201 , Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, A TIN : Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region IV, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the Wolf Creek Generating Station , within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation.
This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation; EA-12-1 52" and should include: (1) the reason for the violation , or, if contested , the basis for disputing the violation ,
(2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
-1- Enclosure
Your response may reference or include previous docketed correspondence , if the correspondence adequately addresses the required response. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended , or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown , consideration will be given to extending the response time.
If you contest this enforcement action , you should also provide a copy of your response, with the basis for your denial, to the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Wash ington, DC 20555-0001 .
Because your response will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room orfrom the NRC 's document system (ADAMS) , accessible from the NRC Website at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html . to the extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be made available to the public without redaction.
If personal privacy or proprietary information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, then please provide a bracketed copy of your response that identifies the information that should be protected and a redacted copy of your response that deletes such information. If you request withholding of such material, you must specifically identify the portions of your response that you seek to have withheld and provide in detail the bases for your claim of withholding (e.g. ,
explain why the disclosure of information will create an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy or provide the information required by 10 CFR 2.390(b) to support a request for withholding confidential commercial or financial information). If safeguards information is necessary to provide an acceptable response , please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21 .
In accordance with 10 CFR 19.11 , you may be required to post this Notice within 2 working days of receipt.
Dated this 21st day of August 2012-2- Enclosure
