ML15013A278: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Joseph F. Halloran l Shareholder Attorney at Law (651) 644 | {{#Wiki_filter:Joseph F. Halloran l Shareholder Attorney at Law (651) 644-4710 E-mail: jhalloran@thejacobsonlawgroup.com | ||
-4710 E-mail: jhalloran@thejacobsonlawgroup.com | |||
December 1 7, 2014 Mark J. Langer, Clerk U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 333 Constitution Avenue N.W. | December 1 7 , 2014 Mark J. Langer, Clerk U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 333 Constitution Avenue N.W. | ||
Washington, D.C. 20001 | Washington, D.C. 20001 | ||
| Line 36: | Line 35: | ||
The Amended Docketing Statement supplements the Community's response to question 6(g), which asks for identification of cases "which involve substantially the same issues as the instant case presents," and identifies a matter now pending before the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB). The Federal Respondents' counsel Andrew Averbach referenced this ASLB proceeding in his December 5, 2014 letter to you. | The Amended Docketing Statement supplements the Community's response to question 6(g), which asks for identification of cases "which involve substantially the same issues as the instant case presents," and identifies a matter now pending before the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB). The Federal Respondents' counsel Andrew Averbach referenced this ASLB proceeding in his December 5, 2014 letter to you. | ||
The Community respectfully disagrees with Mr. Averbach's assertion that the issue raised in the context of the ASLB proceeding is "substantially similar" to the issues presented in the context of this appeal, and his suggestion that the Community has failed to exhaust its administrative remedies, but nevertheless identifies the ASLB proceeding in its Amended Docketing Statemen t as a professional courtesy and out of an abundance of caution. | The Community respectfully disagrees with Mr. Averbach's assertion that the issue raised in the context of the ASLB proceeding is "substantially similar" to the issues presented in the context of this appeal, and his suggestion that the Community has failed to exhaust its administrative remedies , but nevertheless identifies the ASLB proceeding in its Amended Docketing Statemen t as a professional courtesy and out of an abundance of caution. | ||
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your consideration. | If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your consideration. | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, /s/Joseph Halloran Joseph F. Halloran | ||
Enclosure (as stated) | Enclosure (as stated) | ||
Cc: Philip R. Mahowald, PIIC General Counsel Service | Cc: Philip R. Mahowald, PIIC General Counsel Service L is t USCA Case #14-1212 Document #1527918 Filed: 12/17/2014 Page 1 of 1}} | ||
Revision as of 07:59, 9 July 2018
| ML15013A278 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Prairie Island  |
| Issue date: | 12/17/2014 |
| From: | Halloran J F Jacobson, Magnuson, Anderson & Halloran P.C. |
| To: | Langer M J NRC/OGC, US Federal Judiciary, US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit |
| Creedon, Meghan | |
| References | |
| 14-1212 | |
| Download: ML15013A278 (1) | |
Text
Joseph F. Halloran l Shareholder Attorney at Law (651) 644-4710 E-mail: jhalloran@thejacobsonlawgroup.com
December 1 7 , 2014 Mark J. Langer, Clerk U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 333 Constitution Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
-2866
SUBJECT:
Prairie Island Indian Community v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
No. 14-1212 (consolidated with Nos. 14
-1210, 14-1216, 14-1217)
Dear Mr. Langer:
Enclosed herewith for filing is the Petitioner Prairie Island Indian Community's Amended Docketing Statement, which amends and supplements the Community's original Docketing Statement filed with the Court on December 1, 2014.
The Amended Docketing Statement supplements the Community's response to question 6(g), which asks for identification of cases "which involve substantially the same issues as the instant case presents," and identifies a matter now pending before the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB). The Federal Respondents' counsel Andrew Averbach referenced this ASLB proceeding in his December 5, 2014 letter to you.
The Community respectfully disagrees with Mr. Averbach's assertion that the issue raised in the context of the ASLB proceeding is "substantially similar" to the issues presented in the context of this appeal, and his suggestion that the Community has failed to exhaust its administrative remedies , but nevertheless identifies the ASLB proceeding in its Amended Docketing Statemen t as a professional courtesy and out of an abundance of caution.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely, /s/Joseph Halloran Joseph F. Halloran
Enclosure (as stated)
Cc: Philip R. Mahowald, PIIC General Counsel Service L is t USCA Case #14-1212 Document #1527918 Filed: 12/17/2014 Page 1 of 1