|
|
Line 17: |
Line 17: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:UNITEDSTATESOFAMERICANUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSION IntheMatterofRochester GasandElectricCorporation (R.E.GinnaNuclearPowerPlant))))DocketNo.50-244)APPLICATION FORAMENDMENT TPERATINLIENEPursuanttoSection50.90oftheregulations oftheU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission (NRC),Rochester GasandElectricCorporation (RGB),holderofFacilityOperating LicenseNo.DPR-18,herebyrequeststhattheTechnical Specifications setforthinAppendixAtothatlicense,beamended.Thisrequestforchangeistoincorporate reference tothemethodology fordetermining ReactorCoolantSystem(RCS)PressureTemperature (P/T)limitsandLowTemperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP)limitsintotheAdministrative ControlssectionfortheRCSPressureandTemperature LimitsReport(PTLR).Adescription oftheamendment request,necessary background information, justification oftherequested changes,andnosignificant hazardsandenvironmental considerations areprovidedIinAttachment I.Thisevaluation demonstrates thattheproposedchangesdonotinvolveasignificant changeinthetypesorasignificant increaseintheamountsofeffluents oranychangeintheauthorized powerlevelofthefacility. | | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation (R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant))))Docket No.50-244)APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT T PERATIN LI EN E Pursuant to Section 50.90 of the regulations of the U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation (RGB), holder of Facility Operating License No.DPR-18, hereby requests that the Technical Specifications set forth in Appendix A to that license, be amended.This request for change is to incorporate reference to the methodology for determining Reactor Coolant System (RCS)Pressure Temperature (P/T)limits and Low Temperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP)limits into the Administrative Controls section for the RCS Pressure and Temperature Limits Report (PTLR).A description of the amendment request, necessary background information, justification of the requested changes, and no significant hazards and environmental considerations are provided I in Attachment I.This evaluation demonstrates that the proposed changes do not involve a significant change in the types or a significant increase in the amounts of effluents or any change in the authorized power level of the facility.The proposed changes also do not involve a significant hazards consideration. |
| Theproposedchangesalsodonotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration.
| | 9603210235 960315 PDR ADQCK 05000244 P.PDR I' A marked up copy of the Ginna Station Technical Specifications which show the requested changes is set forth in Attachment II.The proposed revised technical specifications are provided in Attachment III.WHEREFORE, Applicant respectfully requests that Facility Operating License No.DPR-18, and Attachment A to that license, be amended in the form attached hereto as Attachment III.Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation By Robert C.Mecredy Vice President Nuclear Operations Subscribed and sworn to before me on this 15th day of March 1996.No ary Public LORETTA MARSHALLPARKER Nosy Public m thestate of New Yotft MONROE COUNTY Cotnnxseen Expires Dec.12, ife.p. |
| 9603210235 960315PDRADQCK05000244P.PDR I' AmarkedupcopyoftheGinnaStationTechnical Specifications whichshowtherequested changesissetforthinAttachment II.Theproposedrevisedtechnical specifications areprovidedinAttachment III.WHEREFORE, Applicant respectfully requeststhatFacilityOperating LicenseNo.DPR-18,andAttachment Atothatlicense,beamendedintheformattachedheretoasAttachment III.Rochester GasandElectricCorporation ByRobertC.MecredyVicePresident NuclearOperations Subscribed andsworntobeforemeonthis15thdayofMarch1996.NoaryPublicLORETTAMARSHALLPARKER NosyPublicmthestateofNewYotftMONROECOUNTYCotnnxseen ExpiresDec.12,ife.p. | | Attachment I, R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant License Amendment Request Implementation of Generic Letter 96-03 This attachment provides a description of the license amendment request (LAR)and the necessary justifications to support incorporation of the methodology for determining Reactor Coolant System (RCS)pressure temperature (P/T)limits and low temperature overpressure protection (LTOP)limits into the Administrative Controls section for the RCS Pressure and Temperature Limits Report (PTLR).This attachment is divided into six sections as follows.Section A summarizes all changes to the Ginna Station Technical Specifications while Section B provides the background and history associated with the changes being requested. |
| Attachment I,R.E.GinnaNuclearPowerPlantLicenseAmendment RequestImplementation ofGenericLetter96-03Thisattachment providesadescription ofthelicenseamendment request(LAR)andthenecessary justifications tosupportincorporation ofthemethodology fordetermining ReactorCoolantSystem(RCS)pressuretemperature (P/T)limitsandlowtemperature overpressure protection (LTOP)limitsintotheAdministrative ControlssectionfortheRCSPressureandTemperature LimitsReport(PTLR).Thisattachment isdividedintosixsectionsasfollows.SectionAsummarizes allchangestotheGinnaStationTechnical Specifications whileSectionBprovidesthebackground andhistoryassociated withthechangesbeingrequested. | | Section C provides the justifications associated with these proposed changes.A no significant hazards consideration evaluation and environmental consideration of the requested changes to the Ginna Station Technical Specifications are provided in Sections D and E, respectively. |
| SectionCprovidesthejustifications associated withtheseproposedchanges.Anosignificant hazardsconsideration evaluation andenvironmental consideration oftherequested changestotheGinnaStationTechnical Specifications areprovidedinSectionsDandE,respectively.
| | Section F lists all references used in this attachment. |
| SectionFlistsallreferences usedinthisattachment.
| | A.DESCRIPTION OF TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGES This LAR proposes to revise the Ginna Station Technical Specifications to incorporate reference to the methodology for determining P/T and LTOP limits.The change is summarized below and shown in Attachment II.Administrative Controls 5.6.6 Item c will be revised to reference the methodology for determining P/T and LTOP limits and to delete reference to Amendment No.48. |
| A.DESCRIPTION OFTECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGESThisLARproposestorevisetheGinnaStationTechnical Specifications toincorporate reference tothemethodology fordetermining P/TandLTOPlimits.Thechangeissummarized belowandshowninAttachment II.Administrative Controls5.6.6Itemcwillberevisedtoreference themethodology fordetermining P/TandLTOPlimitsandtodeletereference toAmendment No.48. | | B.BACKGROVND During the conversion to improved standard technical specifications (ITS)for Ginna Station, RGAE had proposed to relocate the LTOP and RCS P/T limits to the PTLR (Ref.1).Associated with this change was the addition oF a reference to the Administrative Controls section of technical specifications related to the PTLR documenting the methodology used for all changes to these limits.However, the proposed methodology would be"new" with respect to determination of both the LTOP and RCS P/T limits.Due to time constraints, RG&E informed the NRC that use of this new methodology would be burdensome and instead, RGB wished to retain the existing values.The NRC agreed with this concern and allowed the existing limits to be relocated to the PTLR but required changes to these limits to be reviewed and approved by the NRC as documented in Reference 2.Subsequent to the conversion to ITS, Generic Letter 96-03 was released providing guidance to licensees for relocating the LTOP and RCS P/T limits to the PTLR with incorporation of the methodology for determining these limits added to the Administrative Controls section of technical specifications. |
| B.BACKGROVND Duringtheconversion toimprovedstandardtechnical specifications (ITS)forGinnaStation,RGAEhadproposedtorelocatetheLTOPandRCSP/TlimitstothePTLR(Ref.1).Associated withthischangewastheadditionoFareference totheAdministrative Controlssectionoftechnical specifications relatedtothePTLRdocumenting themethodology usedforallchangestotheselimits.However,theproposedmethodology wouldbe"new"withrespecttodetermination ofboththeLTOPandRCSP/Tlimits.Duetotimeconstraints, RG&EinformedtheNRCthatuseofthisnewmethodology wouldbeburdensome andinstead,RGBwishedtoretaintheexistingvalues.TheNRCagreedwiththisconcernandallowedtheexistinglimitstoberelocated tothePTLRbutrequiredchangestotheselimitstobereviewedandapprovedbytheNRCasdocumented inReference 2.Subsequent totheconversion toITS,GenericLetter96-03wasreleasedproviding guidancetolicensees forrelocating theLTOPandRCSP/TlimitstothePTLRwithincorporation ofthemethodology fordetermining theselimitsaddedtotheAdministrative Controlssectionoftechnical specifications. | | Also, the NRC's review of the latest reactor vessel capsule is nearing completion such that methodology for both RCS P/T limits and LTOP limits can now be incorporated into technical specifications without placing an undue burden on plant staff.Generic Letter 96-03 requires that licensees reference the methodology in the technical specifications and provide a proposed PTLR using the methodology for NRC review.The proposed methodology for the P/T limits will be WCAP-14040, Revision 1 (Ref.3)which has been generically approved for use by the NRC.However, the revised PTLR using this methodology will be submitted at a later date upon completion of the NRC review of latest reactor vessel capsule data.The proposed methodology for the LTOP limits is that documented in Reference 1 which has received previous NRC review during the technical specification conversion process.This will also be reflected in the forthcoming revised PTLR.C.JUSTII'"ICATION OF CHANGES This section provides the justification for all changes described in Section A above and shown in Attachment II.The justifications are organized based on whether the change is: more restrictive (M), less restrictive (L), administrative (A), or the requirement is relocated (R).The justifications listed below are also referenced in the technical specification(s) which are affected (see Attachment Il). |
| Also,theNRC'sreviewofthelatestreactorvesselcapsuleisnearingcompletion suchthatmethodology forbothRCSP/TlimitsandLTOPlimitscannowbeincorporated intotechnical specifications withoutplacinganundueburdenonplantstaff.GenericLetter96-03requiresthatlicensees reference themethodology inthetechnical specifications andprovideaproposedPTLRusingthemethodology forNRCreview.Theproposedmethodology fortheP/TlimitswillbeWCAP-14040, Revision1(Ref.3)whichhasbeengenerically approvedforusebytheNRC.However,therevisedPTLRusingthismethodology willbesubmitted atalaterdateuponcompletion oftheNRCreviewoflatestreactorvesselcapsuledata.Theproposedmethodology fortheLTOPlimitsisthatdocumented inReference 1whichhasreceivedpreviousNRCreviewduringthetechnical specification conversion process.Thiswillalsobereflected intheforthcoming revisedPTLR.C.JUSTII'"ICATION OFCHANGESThissectionprovidesthejustification forallchangesdescribed inSectionAaboveandshowninAttachment II.Thejustifications areorganized basedonwhetherthechangeis:morerestrictive (M),lessrestrictive (L),administrative (A),ortherequirement isrelocated (R).Thejustifications listedbelowarealsoreferenced inthetechnical specification(s) whichareaffected(seeAttachment Il). | | C.l A.l Administrative Controls Section 5.6.6.c is revised to state that"the analytical methods used to determine the RCS pressure and temperature and LTOP limits shall be those previously reviewed and approved by the NRC" versus referencing Amendment No.48 to the technical specifications. |
| C.lA.lAdministrative ControlsSection5.6.6.cisrevisedtostatethat"theanalytical methodsusedtodetermine theRCSpressureandtemperature andLTOPlimitsshallbethosepreviously reviewedandapprovedbytheNRC"versusreferencing Amendment No.48tothetechnical specifications. | | This change is administrative in nature since the RCS P/T limits and LTOP limits were previously relocated from-technical specifications to the PTLR.The only change being requested is that all future changes to these limits must be performed in accordance with NRC approved methodology instead of requiring a license amendment. |
| Thischangeisadministrative innaturesincetheRCSP/TlimitsandLTOPlimitswerepreviously relocated from-technical specifications tothePTLR.Theonlychangebeingrequested isthatallfuturechangestotheselimitsmustbeperformed inaccordance withNRCapprovedmethodology insteadofrequiring alicenseamendment.
| | The change is also consistent with NUREG-1431 and Generic Letter 96-03.There are not any more restrictive (M), less restrictive (L), or relocated (R)changes associated with this LAR.D.SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION EVALUATION The proposed changes to the Ginna Station Technical Specifications as identified in Section A and justified in Section C have been evaluated with respect to 10 CFR 50.92(c)and shown to not involve a significant hazards consideration as described below.This section is organized based on Section C above.D.1 Ev lu ion of Admini tr ive h n e The administrative changes discussed in Section C.l do not involve a significant hazards consideration as discussed below: Operation of Ginna Station in accordance with the proposed changes does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated. |
| Thechangeisalsoconsistent withNUREG-1431 andGenericLetter96-03.Therearenotanymorerestrictive (M),lessrestrictive (L),orrelocated (R)changesassociated withthisLAR.D.SIGNIFICANT HAZARDSCONSIDERATION EVALUATION TheproposedchangestotheGinnaStationTechnical Specifications asidentified inSectionAandjustified inSectionChavebeenevaluated withrespectto10CFR50.92(c)andshowntonotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration asdescribed below.Thissectionisorganized basedonSectionCabove.D.1EvluionofAdminitrivehneTheadministrative changesdiscussed inSectionC.ldonotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration asdiscussed below:Operation ofGinnaStationinaccordance withtheproposedchangesdoesnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated.
| | The proposed changes only require that future RCS P/T and LTOP limits be developed using NRC approved methodology as specified within the Administrative Controls section and do not involve any technical changes.As such, these changes are administrative in nature and do not impact initiators or analyzed events or assumed mitigation of accident or transient events.Therefore, these changes do not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously analyzed. |
| TheproposedchangesonlyrequirethatfutureRCSP/TandLTOPlimitsbedeveloped usingNRCapprovedmethodology asspecified withintheAdministrative Controlssectionanddonotinvolveanytechnical changes.Assuch,thesechangesareadministrative innatureanddonotimpactinitiators oranalyzedeventsorassumedmitigation ofaccidentortransient events.Therefore, thesechangesdonotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously analyzed.
| | Operation of Ginna Station in accordance with the proposed changes does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated. |
| Operation ofGinnaStationinaccordance withtheproposedchangesdoesnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated. | | The proposed changes do not involve a physical alteration of the plant (i.e., no new or different type of equipment will be installed) or changes in the methods governing normal plant operation. |
| Theproposedchangesdonotinvolveaphysicalalteration oftheplant(i.e.,nonewordifferent typeofequipment willbeinstalled) orchangesinthemethodsgoverning normalplantoperation.
| | The proposed changes will not impose any new or different requirements. |
| Theproposedchangeswillnotimposeanynewordifferent requirements.
| | Thus, this change does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated. |
| Thus,thischangedoesnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated. | | Operation of Ginna Station in accordance with the'proposed changes does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.The proposed changes will not reduce a margin of plant safety because the changes do not impact any safety analysis assumptions other than requiring future evaluations of RCS P/T and LTOP limits to be performed in accordance with NRC approved methodology. |
| Operation ofGinnaStationinaccordance withthe'proposed changesdoesnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Theproposedchangeswillnotreduceamarginofplantsafetybecausethechangesdonotimpactanysafetyanalysisassumptions otherthanrequiring futureevaluations ofRCSP/TandLTOPlimitstobeperformed inaccordance withNRCapprovedmethodology. | | These changes are administrative in nature.As such, no question of safety is involved, and the change does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.Based upon the above information, it has been determined that the proposed administrative changes to the Ginna Station Technical Specifications do not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated, does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident previously evaluated, and does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.Therefore, it is concluded that the proposed changes meet.the requirements of 10 CFR 50.92(c)and do not involve a significant hazards consideration. |
| Thesechangesareadministrative innature.Assuch,noquestionofsafetyisinvolved, andthechangedoesnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Basedupontheaboveinformation, ithasbeendetermined thattheproposedadministrative changestotheGinnaStationTechnical Specifications donotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated, doesnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentpreviously evaluated, anddoesnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Therefore, itisconcluded thattheproposedchangesmeet.therequirements of10CFR50.92(c)anddonotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration.
| | E.ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION RGAE has evaluated the proposed changes and determined that: 1.The changes do not involve a significant hazards consideration as documented in Section D above;2.The changes do not involve a significant change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite since no specifications related to offsite releases are affected;and 3.The changes do not involve a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure since no new or different type of equipment are required to be installed as a result of this LAR.Accordingly, the proposed changes meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). |
| E.ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION RGAEhasevaluated theproposedchangesanddetermined that:1.Thechangesdonotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration asdocumented inSectionDabove;2.Thechangesdonotinvolveasignificant changeinthetypesorsignificant increaseintheamountsofanyeffluents thatmaybereleasedoffsitesincenospecifications relatedtooffsitereleasesareaffected; and3.Thechangesdonotinvolveasignificant increaseinindividual orcumulative occupational radiation exposuresincenonewordifferent typeofequipment arerequiredtobeinstalled asaresultofthisLAR.Accordingly, theproposedchangesmeettheeligibility criteriaforcategorical exclusion setforthin10CFR51.22(c)(9). | | Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), an environmental assessment of the proposed changes is not required. |
| Therefore, pursuantto10CFR51.22(b), | |
| anenvironmental assessment oftheproposedchangesisnotrequired.
| |
|
| |
|
| F.REFERENCES LetterfromR.R.Mecredy,RGAE,toA.A.johnson,NRC, | | F.REFERENCES Letter from R.R.Mecredy, RGAE, to A.A.johnson, NRC, |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:== | | ==Subject:== |
| Technical SpecifIcations Improvement Program,ReactorCoolantSystem(RCS)PressureandTemperature LimitsReport(PTLR),datedDecember8,1995.2.LetterfromL.B.Marsh,NRC,toR.R.Mecredy,RG8cE,RZ'.Ginna-Acceptance forReferencing ofPressureTemperature LimitsReport(TAC8M92320),datedDecember26,1995.3.&CAP-14040,Methodology UsedtoDevelopColdOverpressure Mitigating SystemSetpoints andRCSHeatupandCooldownLimitCurves,Revision1.-5-}} | | Technical SpecifIcations Improvement Program, Reactor Coolant System (RCS)Pressure and Temperature Limits Report (PTLR), dated December 8, 1995.2.Letter from L.B.Marsh, NRC, to R.R.Mecredy, RG8cE, RZ'.Ginna-Acceptance for Referencing of Pressure Temperature Limits Report (TAC 8 M92320), dated December 26, 1995.3.&CAP-14040, Methodology Used to Develop Cold Overpressure Mitigating System Setpoints and RCS Heatup and Cooldown Limit Curves, Revision 1.-5-}} |
Similar Documents at Ginna |
---|
Category:OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING
MONTHYEARML17265A6921999-06-28028 June 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-18 to Revise ITS Associated with RCS Leakage Detection Instrumentation.Lar Proposed as Result of Commitment That Rg&E Submit as Part of Staff Review of Application of leak-before-break Status ML17265A5691999-03-0101 March 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,proposing Change in ITS to Revise Battery Cell Parameters Limit for Specific Gravity (SR 3.8.6.3 & SR 3.8.6.6) ML17265A4651998-11-24024 November 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Improved Tech Spec Description of Fuel Cladding Matl (TS 4.2.1) & Updating References Provided in TS 5.6.5 for COLR ML17265A2431998-04-27027 April 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Requirements Associated W/Sfp to Reflect Planned Mod to Storage Racks & Temporarily Addressing Boraflex Degradation within Pool ML17264B0431997-09-29029 September 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Administrative Controls W/Respect to RCS Pressure & Temp Limits Rept ML17264B0381997-09-29029 September 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS Re Allowable Value & Trip Setpoint for High Steam Flow Input Into LCO Table 3.3.2-1,Function 4d (Main Steam Isolation) to Address Issues Identified in Revised Setpoint Analysis ML17264B0021997-08-19019 August 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,allowing Testing of Certain ECCS motor-operated Valves in Mode 4 Which Currently Requires Entry in LCO 3.0.3 ML17264A9981997-08-19019 August 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,correcting Specified Accumulator Borated Water Volume Values in SR 3.5.1.2 to Match Associated Accumulator Percent Level Values ML17264A8661997-04-24024 April 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising RCP PT & Administrative Control Requirements ML17264A8471997-03-31031 March 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Spent Fuel Pool Storage Requirements ML20134D9911996-10-29029 October 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,requesting Change to Mode of Applicability for Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Actuation on Main Feedwater Pump ML17264A7121996-10-29029 October 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18 Requesting Change to Required Actions for Inoperable Channels Associated with Auxiliary Feedwater Pump ML17264A5991996-09-13013 September 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising RCS Pressure & Temp Limits Rept ML17264A4701996-05-0808 May 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,correcting Typos ML17264A4041996-03-15015 March 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS to Incorporate Methodology for Determining RCS P/T Limits & LTOP Limits in Administrative Controls Section of RCS P/T Limits Rept ML17264A3441996-02-0909 February 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS Table 3.3.2-1,Function 5b, Feedwater Isolation,Sg Water Level - High to Raise Allowable Value & Trip Setpoint ML17264A3381996-02-0909 February 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS to Incorporate Ref to Methodology for Determining LTOP Limits Into Administrative Controls Section for RCS PT Limits Rept ML17264A3331996-02-0909 February 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Requirements for Containment Closure During Mode 6 to Allow Use of Installed Overhead Door Assembly to Isolate Equipment Hatch Opening ML17264A3221996-01-26026 January 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,incorporating Changes Necessary to Reflect Revised Nuclear Fuel Loading ML17264A2521995-11-27027 November 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS to Implement 10CFR50,App J,Option B ML17264A2551995-11-20020 November 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,submitting Changes to TS Instrumentation Requirements & Conversion to Improved TS ML17264A1501995-08-31031 August 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,proposing Ts,By Implementing WCAP-10271,its Assoc Suppls & Other Re Changes W/Respect to RTS & ESFAS ML17263B0671995-05-26026 May 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TSs in Entirety to Convert to Improved TSs ML17263A9771995-03-13013 March 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,to Revise TS 4.4.2.4.a to Replace Specific Leakage Testing Frequencies for Containment Isolation Valves ML17309A5501994-07-15015 July 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,proposing TS 3.5, Providing NRC W/Opportunity to Communicate at Early Stage Any Concerns W/Respect to Differences from NUREG-1431 ML17263A7141994-06-24024 June 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,re Upgrading of Administrative Controls Section 6 ML17263A7071994-06-15015 June 1994 Notarized Application for Amend to License DPR-18 Re Reactor Coolant Activity ML17263A6551994-05-23023 May 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,increasing Allowable Reactor Coolant Activity Levels to Improved TS (NUREG-1431) ML17263A6411994-05-13013 May 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS Administrative Controls Section 6.0 Consistent W/Improved TS ML17263A3181993-07-13013 July 1993 Application for Amend to License Revisions for License DPR-18 Re Removing Containment Isolation Valve Table 3.6-1 from TS ML17263A2081993-04-0505 April 1993 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS to Remove Containment Isolation Valve Table 3.6-1 & Maintain Required Listing in Updated FSAR ML17262B1171992-12-17017 December 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-19,revising TS Sections 3.2 & 3.3 to Eliminate Use of High Concentration Boric Acid as safety-related Source of SI Pumps & Increasing Allowable Outage Times ML17262B0991992-11-30030 November 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS to Remove Table of Containment Isolation Valves & Provide Ref in Bases to UFSAR ML17262B0571992-10-0808 October 1992 Corrected Application for Amend to License DPR-18,adding Addl Requirements to Auxiliary Electrical Sys TS & Action Statements for Instrument Bus Sys,Consisting of Notarized Page Two ML17262B0431992-10-0808 October 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,adding Addl Requirements to Auxiliary Electrical Sys TS & Action Statements for Instrument Bus Sys,Per Guidance Provided in GL 91-11 Re Resolution of GI 48 ML17262B0201992-09-15015 September 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS Sections 3.1.1.4,3.1.1.6,4.3.4 & Adding site-specific Basis Sections to Address GL 90-06 Re Resolution of Generic Issues 70 & 94 ML17262A9121992-06-22022 June 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS 4.3.1 Per Guidance Provided in Generic Ltr 91-01, Removal of Schedule for Withdrawal of Reactor Vessel Matl Specimens from Ts. ML17262A8311992-04-23023 April 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,changing TSs to Redefine Snubber Visual Insp Schedule,Per Generic Ltr 90-09 Guidance ML17262A8211992-04-21021 April 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,instituting Std License Condition for Fire Protection Program & Removing Requirements for Fire Protection Sys from Tss,Per Guidance in Generic Ltrs 86-10 & 88-12 ML17262A7861992-03-23023 March 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Tech Spec Section 6.5.1, Plant Operations Review Committee Function. ML17262A7801992-03-20020 March 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS 5.1 Figure 5.1-1 to Describe Rather than Depict Site Area Boundary to Evaluate Radiological Releases to Unrestricted Area ML17262A7901992-03-20020 March 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Tech Specs 6.9.1.2 & 6.9.2.5 ML17262A6321991-10-25025 October 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18 to Delete TS 5.1 & Figure 5.1-1 ML17262A5331991-06-20020 June 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,to Incorporate Changes to Specifications & Action Statements for Offsite & Onsite Power Sources Available for Operation of Plant Auxiliaries ML17262A4121991-03-0808 March 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,removing Table 3.6-1 Re Containment Isolation Valves from Tech Specs ML17262A3831991-02-15015 February 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Tech Specs to Modify Method of Locking Open Motor Operated Valve 856, Refueling Water Storage Tank Delivery Valve When Reactor Coolant Sys at or Above 350 F ML17262A3751991-02-15015 February 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Heatup/Cooldown Curves & Associated Low Temp Overpressure Protection Setpoint to Implement Reg Guide 1.99,Rev 2 Methodology ML17262A3721991-02-15015 February 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,providing Clarification of Which QA Activities Subj to Audit Considerations & Changing Audit Frequency Described in Tech Spec 6.5.2.8d ML17262A3871991-02-15015 February 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Tech Spec Tables 3.5-5 & 4.1-5 Based on Mods to Radiation Monitoring Sys ML17262A2951991-01-14014 January 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,changing Tech Specs to Limit Containment Internal Pressure to 1 Psig Vs 6 Psig Per Initial Condition Assumptions in Containment Integrity Analysis 1999-06-28
[Table view] Category:TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
MONTHYEARML17265A6921999-06-28028 June 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-18 to Revise ITS Associated with RCS Leakage Detection Instrumentation.Lar Proposed as Result of Commitment That Rg&E Submit as Part of Staff Review of Application of leak-before-break Status ML17265A5691999-03-0101 March 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,proposing Change in ITS to Revise Battery Cell Parameters Limit for Specific Gravity (SR 3.8.6.3 & SR 3.8.6.6) ML17265A4651998-11-24024 November 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Improved Tech Spec Description of Fuel Cladding Matl (TS 4.2.1) & Updating References Provided in TS 5.6.5 for COLR ML17265A2431998-04-27027 April 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Requirements Associated W/Sfp to Reflect Planned Mod to Storage Racks & Temporarily Addressing Boraflex Degradation within Pool ML17264B0431997-09-29029 September 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Administrative Controls W/Respect to RCS Pressure & Temp Limits Rept ML17264B0381997-09-29029 September 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS Re Allowable Value & Trip Setpoint for High Steam Flow Input Into LCO Table 3.3.2-1,Function 4d (Main Steam Isolation) to Address Issues Identified in Revised Setpoint Analysis ML17264B0021997-08-19019 August 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,allowing Testing of Certain ECCS motor-operated Valves in Mode 4 Which Currently Requires Entry in LCO 3.0.3 ML17264A9981997-08-19019 August 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,correcting Specified Accumulator Borated Water Volume Values in SR 3.5.1.2 to Match Associated Accumulator Percent Level Values ML17264A8661997-04-24024 April 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising RCP PT & Administrative Control Requirements ML17264A8471997-03-31031 March 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Spent Fuel Pool Storage Requirements ML20134D9911996-10-29029 October 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,requesting Change to Mode of Applicability for Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Actuation on Main Feedwater Pump ML17264A7121996-10-29029 October 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18 Requesting Change to Required Actions for Inoperable Channels Associated with Auxiliary Feedwater Pump ML17264A5991996-09-13013 September 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising RCS Pressure & Temp Limits Rept ML17264A4701996-05-0808 May 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,correcting Typos ML17264A4041996-03-15015 March 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS to Incorporate Methodology for Determining RCS P/T Limits & LTOP Limits in Administrative Controls Section of RCS P/T Limits Rept ML17264A3441996-02-0909 February 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS Table 3.3.2-1,Function 5b, Feedwater Isolation,Sg Water Level - High to Raise Allowable Value & Trip Setpoint ML17264A3381996-02-0909 February 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS to Incorporate Ref to Methodology for Determining LTOP Limits Into Administrative Controls Section for RCS PT Limits Rept ML17264A3331996-02-0909 February 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Requirements for Containment Closure During Mode 6 to Allow Use of Installed Overhead Door Assembly to Isolate Equipment Hatch Opening ML17264A3221996-01-26026 January 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,incorporating Changes Necessary to Reflect Revised Nuclear Fuel Loading ML17264A2521995-11-27027 November 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS to Implement 10CFR50,App J,Option B ML17264A2551995-11-20020 November 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,submitting Changes to TS Instrumentation Requirements & Conversion to Improved TS ML17264A1501995-08-31031 August 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,proposing Ts,By Implementing WCAP-10271,its Assoc Suppls & Other Re Changes W/Respect to RTS & ESFAS ML17263B0671995-05-26026 May 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TSs in Entirety to Convert to Improved TSs ML17263A9771995-03-13013 March 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,to Revise TS 4.4.2.4.a to Replace Specific Leakage Testing Frequencies for Containment Isolation Valves ML17309A5501994-07-15015 July 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,proposing TS 3.5, Providing NRC W/Opportunity to Communicate at Early Stage Any Concerns W/Respect to Differences from NUREG-1431 ML17263A7141994-06-24024 June 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,re Upgrading of Administrative Controls Section 6 ML17263A7071994-06-15015 June 1994 Notarized Application for Amend to License DPR-18 Re Reactor Coolant Activity ML17263A6551994-05-23023 May 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,increasing Allowable Reactor Coolant Activity Levels to Improved TS (NUREG-1431) ML17263A6411994-05-13013 May 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS Administrative Controls Section 6.0 Consistent W/Improved TS ML17263A3181993-07-13013 July 1993 Application for Amend to License Revisions for License DPR-18 Re Removing Containment Isolation Valve Table 3.6-1 from TS ML17263A2081993-04-0505 April 1993 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS to Remove Containment Isolation Valve Table 3.6-1 & Maintain Required Listing in Updated FSAR ML17262B1171992-12-17017 December 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-19,revising TS Sections 3.2 & 3.3 to Eliminate Use of High Concentration Boric Acid as safety-related Source of SI Pumps & Increasing Allowable Outage Times ML17262B0991992-11-30030 November 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS to Remove Table of Containment Isolation Valves & Provide Ref in Bases to UFSAR ML17262B0571992-10-0808 October 1992 Corrected Application for Amend to License DPR-18,adding Addl Requirements to Auxiliary Electrical Sys TS & Action Statements for Instrument Bus Sys,Consisting of Notarized Page Two ML17262B0431992-10-0808 October 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,adding Addl Requirements to Auxiliary Electrical Sys TS & Action Statements for Instrument Bus Sys,Per Guidance Provided in GL 91-11 Re Resolution of GI 48 ML17262B0201992-09-15015 September 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS Sections 3.1.1.4,3.1.1.6,4.3.4 & Adding site-specific Basis Sections to Address GL 90-06 Re Resolution of Generic Issues 70 & 94 ML17262A9121992-06-22022 June 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS 4.3.1 Per Guidance Provided in Generic Ltr 91-01, Removal of Schedule for Withdrawal of Reactor Vessel Matl Specimens from Ts. ML17262A8311992-04-23023 April 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,changing TSs to Redefine Snubber Visual Insp Schedule,Per Generic Ltr 90-09 Guidance ML17262A8211992-04-21021 April 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,instituting Std License Condition for Fire Protection Program & Removing Requirements for Fire Protection Sys from Tss,Per Guidance in Generic Ltrs 86-10 & 88-12 ML17262A7861992-03-23023 March 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Tech Spec Section 6.5.1, Plant Operations Review Committee Function. ML17262A7801992-03-20020 March 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS 5.1 Figure 5.1-1 to Describe Rather than Depict Site Area Boundary to Evaluate Radiological Releases to Unrestricted Area ML17262A7901992-03-20020 March 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Tech Specs 6.9.1.2 & 6.9.2.5 ML17262A6321991-10-25025 October 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18 to Delete TS 5.1 & Figure 5.1-1 ML17262A5331991-06-20020 June 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,to Incorporate Changes to Specifications & Action Statements for Offsite & Onsite Power Sources Available for Operation of Plant Auxiliaries ML17262A4121991-03-0808 March 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,removing Table 3.6-1 Re Containment Isolation Valves from Tech Specs ML17262A3831991-02-15015 February 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Tech Specs to Modify Method of Locking Open Motor Operated Valve 856, Refueling Water Storage Tank Delivery Valve When Reactor Coolant Sys at or Above 350 F ML17262A3751991-02-15015 February 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Heatup/Cooldown Curves & Associated Low Temp Overpressure Protection Setpoint to Implement Reg Guide 1.99,Rev 2 Methodology ML17262A3721991-02-15015 February 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,providing Clarification of Which QA Activities Subj to Audit Considerations & Changing Audit Frequency Described in Tech Spec 6.5.2.8d ML17262A3871991-02-15015 February 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Tech Spec Tables 3.5-5 & 4.1-5 Based on Mods to Radiation Monitoring Sys ML17262A2951991-01-14014 January 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,changing Tech Specs to Limit Containment Internal Pressure to 1 Psig Vs 6 Psig Per Initial Condition Assumptions in Containment Integrity Analysis 1999-06-28
[Table view] |
Text
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation (R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant))))Docket No.50-244)APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT T PERATIN LI EN E Pursuant to Section 50.90 of the regulations of the U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation (RGB), holder of Facility Operating License No.DPR-18, hereby requests that the Technical Specifications set forth in Appendix A to that license, be amended.This request for change is to incorporate reference to the methodology for determining Reactor Coolant System (RCS)Pressure Temperature (P/T)limits and Low Temperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP)limits into the Administrative Controls section for the RCS Pressure and Temperature Limits Report (PTLR).A description of the amendment request, necessary background information, justification of the requested changes, and no significant hazards and environmental considerations are provided I in Attachment I.This evaluation demonstrates that the proposed changes do not involve a significant change in the types or a significant increase in the amounts of effluents or any change in the authorized power level of the facility.The proposed changes also do not involve a significant hazards consideration.
9603210235 960315 PDR ADQCK 05000244 P.PDR I' A marked up copy of the Ginna Station Technical Specifications which show the requested changes is set forth in Attachment II.The proposed revised technical specifications are provided in Attachment III.WHEREFORE, Applicant respectfully requests that Facility Operating License No.DPR-18, and Attachment A to that license, be amended in the form attached hereto as Attachment III.Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation By Robert C.Mecredy Vice President Nuclear Operations Subscribed and sworn to before me on this 15th day of March 1996.No ary Public LORETTA MARSHALLPARKER Nosy Public m thestate of New Yotft MONROE COUNTY Cotnnxseen Expires Dec.12, ife.p.
Attachment I, R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant License Amendment Request Implementation of Generic Letter 96-03 This attachment provides a description of the license amendment request (LAR)and the necessary justifications to support incorporation of the methodology for determining Reactor Coolant System (RCS)pressure temperature (P/T)limits and low temperature overpressure protection (LTOP)limits into the Administrative Controls section for the RCS Pressure and Temperature Limits Report (PTLR).This attachment is divided into six sections as follows.Section A summarizes all changes to the Ginna Station Technical Specifications while Section B provides the background and history associated with the changes being requested.
Section C provides the justifications associated with these proposed changes.A no significant hazards consideration evaluation and environmental consideration of the requested changes to the Ginna Station Technical Specifications are provided in Sections D and E, respectively.
Section F lists all references used in this attachment.
A.DESCRIPTION OF TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGES This LAR proposes to revise the Ginna Station Technical Specifications to incorporate reference to the methodology for determining P/T and LTOP limits.The change is summarized below and shown in Attachment II.Administrative Controls 5.6.6 Item c will be revised to reference the methodology for determining P/T and LTOP limits and to delete reference to Amendment No.48.
B.BACKGROVND During the conversion to improved standard technical specifications (ITS)for Ginna Station, RGAE had proposed to relocate the LTOP and RCS P/T limits to the PTLR (Ref.1).Associated with this change was the addition oF a reference to the Administrative Controls section of technical specifications related to the PTLR documenting the methodology used for all changes to these limits.However, the proposed methodology would be"new" with respect to determination of both the LTOP and RCS P/T limits.Due to time constraints, RG&E informed the NRC that use of this new methodology would be burdensome and instead, RGB wished to retain the existing values.The NRC agreed with this concern and allowed the existing limits to be relocated to the PTLR but required changes to these limits to be reviewed and approved by the NRC as documented in Reference 2.Subsequent to the conversion to ITS, Generic Letter 96-03 was released providing guidance to licensees for relocating the LTOP and RCS P/T limits to the PTLR with incorporation of the methodology for determining these limits added to the Administrative Controls section of technical specifications.
Also, the NRC's review of the latest reactor vessel capsule is nearing completion such that methodology for both RCS P/T limits and LTOP limits can now be incorporated into technical specifications without placing an undue burden on plant staff.Generic Letter 96-03 requires that licensees reference the methodology in the technical specifications and provide a proposed PTLR using the methodology for NRC review.The proposed methodology for the P/T limits will be WCAP-14040, Revision 1 (Ref.3)which has been generically approved for use by the NRC.However, the revised PTLR using this methodology will be submitted at a later date upon completion of the NRC review of latest reactor vessel capsule data.The proposed methodology for the LTOP limits is that documented in Reference 1 which has received previous NRC review during the technical specification conversion process.This will also be reflected in the forthcoming revised PTLR.C.JUSTII'"ICATION OF CHANGES This section provides the justification for all changes described in Section A above and shown in Attachment II.The justifications are organized based on whether the change is: more restrictive (M), less restrictive (L), administrative (A), or the requirement is relocated (R).The justifications listed below are also referenced in the technical specification(s) which are affected (see Attachment Il).
C.l A.l Administrative Controls Section 5.6.6.c is revised to state that"the analytical methods used to determine the RCS pressure and temperature and LTOP limits shall be those previously reviewed and approved by the NRC" versus referencing Amendment No.48 to the technical specifications.
This change is administrative in nature since the RCS P/T limits and LTOP limits were previously relocated from-technical specifications to the PTLR.The only change being requested is that all future changes to these limits must be performed in accordance with NRC approved methodology instead of requiring a license amendment.
The change is also consistent with NUREG-1431 and Generic Letter 96-03.There are not any more restrictive (M), less restrictive (L), or relocated (R)changes associated with this LAR.D.SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION EVALUATION The proposed changes to the Ginna Station Technical Specifications as identified in Section A and justified in Section C have been evaluated with respect to 10 CFR 50.92(c)and shown to not involve a significant hazards consideration as described below.This section is organized based on Section C above.D.1 Ev lu ion of Admini tr ive h n e The administrative changes discussed in Section C.l do not involve a significant hazards consideration as discussed below: Operation of Ginna Station in accordance with the proposed changes does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
The proposed changes only require that future RCS P/T and LTOP limits be developed using NRC approved methodology as specified within the Administrative Controls section and do not involve any technical changes.As such, these changes are administrative in nature and do not impact initiators or analyzed events or assumed mitigation of accident or transient events.Therefore, these changes do not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously analyzed.
Operation of Ginna Station in accordance with the proposed changes does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated.
The proposed changes do not involve a physical alteration of the plant (i.e., no new or different type of equipment will be installed) or changes in the methods governing normal plant operation.
The proposed changes will not impose any new or different requirements.
Thus, this change does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated.
Operation of Ginna Station in accordance with the'proposed changes does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.The proposed changes will not reduce a margin of plant safety because the changes do not impact any safety analysis assumptions other than requiring future evaluations of RCS P/T and LTOP limits to be performed in accordance with NRC approved methodology.
These changes are administrative in nature.As such, no question of safety is involved, and the change does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.Based upon the above information, it has been determined that the proposed administrative changes to the Ginna Station Technical Specifications do not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated, does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident previously evaluated, and does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.Therefore, it is concluded that the proposed changes meet.the requirements of 10 CFR 50.92(c)and do not involve a significant hazards consideration.
E.ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION RGAE has evaluated the proposed changes and determined that: 1.The changes do not involve a significant hazards consideration as documented in Section D above;2.The changes do not involve a significant change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite since no specifications related to offsite releases are affected;and 3.The changes do not involve a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure since no new or different type of equipment are required to be installed as a result of this LAR.Accordingly, the proposed changes meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9).
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), an environmental assessment of the proposed changes is not required.
F.REFERENCES Letter from R.R.Mecredy, RGAE, to A.A.johnson, NRC,
Subject:
Technical SpecifIcations Improvement Program, Reactor Coolant System (RCS)Pressure and Temperature Limits Report (PTLR), dated December 8, 1995.2.Letter from L.B.Marsh, NRC, to R.R.Mecredy, RG8cE, RZ'.Ginna-Acceptance for Referencing of Pressure Temperature Limits Report (TAC 8 M92320), dated December 26, 1995.3.&CAP-14040, Methodology Used to Develop Cold Overpressure Mitigating System Setpoints and RCS Heatup and Cooldown Limit Curves, Revision 1.-5-