ML17298A610

Acceptance Review - Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 - TSTF-500 Amendment Request (EPID L-2017-LLA-0312)

ML17298A610
Person / Time
Site:	Peach Bottom
Issue date:	10/25/2017
From:	Richard Ennis Plant Licensing Branch 1
To:	Mascitelli F J Exelon Generation Co
Ennis R B
References
EPID L-2017-LLA-0312
Download: ML17298A610 (2)

Text

From: Ennis, Rick Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 11:47 AM To: Mascitelli, Francis J:(GenCo-Nuc) Cc: Richard.Gropp@exeloncorp.com; David Helker Subject: Acceptance Review - Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 - TSTF-500 Amendment Request (EPID L-2017-LLA-0312) Frank, By letter dated September 29, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. ML17275A069), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) submitted a license amendment request for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Units 2 and The amendment would revise Technical Specification (TS) requirements related to the direct current (DC) electrical power syste The proposed changes are based on Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-500, Revision 2, "DC Electrical Rewrite-Update to TSTF-360."

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staff's acceptance review of this amendment reques The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical revie The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plan Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original application Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information require This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety consideration The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environmen Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance revie You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondenc Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 275 hours0.00318 days <br />0.0764 hours <br />4.546958e-4 weeks <br />1.046375e-4 months <br /> to complet The NRC staff expects to complete this review by September 29, 2018, as requested by Exelon's letter dated September 29, 201 If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during our routine interaction These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information and unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activitie If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-142 Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation