ML20100B765: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 17: Line 17:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.
{{#Wiki_filter:.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I *
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
. g
-/ g g [ /) - 2 [ v I
                      -/ g g [ /) - 2 [ v                                     Docket No. 50-424/425 OLA-3                 EXHIBITNO.__M in the matter of Georale Power Co. et al.. Vcatie Uni'= 1 & 2
* Docket No. 50-424/425 OLA-3 EXHIBITNO.__M - M M
                                                                                                                                              -MM s                                                                        O staff O Appi: cant                                                 ''"
. g in the matter of Georale Power Co. et al.. Vcatie Uni'= 1 & 2 e6ew.Ofntervonor g9TC*n s
o inne.d e6ew.Ofntervonor                      g9TC*n5
O staff O Appi: cant d a R.i.c* Ug" 5 e o inne.d o.a.
;                                                                                                          d a R.i.c* Ug"                   e o.a.     i~noler           win..
i~noler win..
1                       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE U.S.                               DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 2
1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE U.S.
0FFICE C SECRETARV DOCKET E t :ERY!Ci; 3     MAPVIN   B. HOBBY,                                                 )                           IM '
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 2
                                                                                            )
0FFICE C SECRETARV DOCKET E t :ERY!Ci; 3
1             Complainant,                                                   ) CIVIL ACTION
MAPVIN B.
                                                                                            )
: HOBBY,
5           vs.                                                               ) FILE NO.
)
                                                                                            )
IM '
6       GEORGIA POWER. COMPANY,                                               ) 90-ERA-30
)
                                                                                            )
1 Complainant,
7               Respondent.                                                   )
) CIVIL ACTION
)
5 vs.
) FILE NO.
)
6 GEORGIA POWER. COMPANY,
) 90-ERA-30
)
7 Respondent.
)
8 9
8 9
10 11
10 11
        .12 l
.12 l
13                                                           - - -
13 14 DEPOSITION OF 15 LEE BROWN GLENN 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 BULL & ASSOCIATES COURT AND DEPOSITION REPORTERS 24 4651 Roswell Road, N.E.,
14                                 DEPOSITION OF 15                               LEE BROWN GLENN 16                                                           - - -
Suite F-504 Atlanta, Georgia 30342 25 (404) 256-2886 BULL & ASSOCIATES 9601230136 951011 PDR ADOCK 05000424 PDR
17 18 19 20 21 22 23                                   BULL & ASSOCIATES 24                      COURT AND DEPOSITION REPORTERS 4651 Roswell Road, N.E., Suite F-504 25 Atlanta, Georgia 30342 (404) 256-2886 BULL & ASSOCIATES 9601230136 951011 PDR         ADOCK 05000424 PDR


  ,~
,~
              'xs l '
'xs l '
s I
s I
2 1       Deposition of LEE BROWN GLENN 2 taken on behalf of the' Comp _ainant, 3 for the purpose of discovery, upon 4 cross-examination, before Susan       E.
2 1
5 Reynolds, Registered Professional 6 Reporter, Certified Court Reporter 7 and Notary Public, at the Candler 8 Building,   127 Peachtree Street,           ,
Deposition of LEE BROWN GLENN 2
9  N.E., Suite 1400, Atlanta, Georgia,         i 10   commencing at approximately 11   10:00 a.m.,     Thursday, August 23, 12   1990.
taken on behalf of the' Comp _ainant, 3
13 14 15 16 17       ,
for the purpose of discovery, upon 4
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2 5 --
cross-examination, before Susan E.
n,,,,   ,  .cnnn..mme
5 Reynolds, Registered Professional 6
Reporter, Certified Court Reporter 7
and Notary Public, at the Candler 8
: Building, 127 Peachtree Street, 9
N.E.,
Suite 1400, Atlanta, Georgia, i
10 commencing at approximately 11 10:00 a.m.,
Thursday, August 23, 12 1990.
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2 5 --
n,,,,
.cnnn..mme


I'                                                                       \
I'
8 1           A     No,   I do not.
\\
I 1           Q     Okay. What is the corporate 3   concerns procedure?         Is it a manual?
8 1
4           A     It is one of any number of 5   procedures in the corporate guidelines, 6   procedures and guidelines, which the company l
A No, I do not.
7   issues and keeps up-to-date.           In addition to       1 8   that,     I will say that we have an internal l
1 Q
9  operating procedure which gets into more 10   specifics on how we do things.           So maybe I l
Okay.
11   should differentiate between the two.             There is   l 12   a corporate concern procedure in the corporate 13   guicelines.       T1   e is an internal procedure I
What is the corporate 3
14   that we use that governs our day-to-day i
concerns procedure?
i     15   operations.
Is it a manual?
i 16           Q       Are you familiar enough with the l   17   internal operating procedure where you can tell 18   me what it is rather than having to refresh 19   your recollection with the documents?                         l 20           A       I believe so,     yes.
4 A
i 21           Q       All right.     If a complaint is made 1
It is one of any number of 5
l   22   why don't you go through the procedure with me
procedures in the corporate guidelines, 6
. 23   from when someone initially contacts you to I
procedures and guidelines, which the company l
24   what happens from then on.
7 issues and keeps up-to-date.
!    25           A       When someone contacts us,'and a BULL & ASSOCIATES
In addition to 1
8
: that, I will say that we have an internal 9
operating procedure which gets into more 10 specifics on how we do things.
So maybe I 11 should differentiate between the two.
There is 12 a corporate concern procedure in the corporate 13 guicelines.
T1 e is an internal procedure 14 that we use that governs our day-to-day i
i 15 operations.
i 16 Q
Are you familiar enough with the l
17 internal operating procedure where you can tell 18 me what it is rather than having to refresh 19 your recollection with the documents?
20 A
I believe so, yes.
i 21 Q
All right.
If a complaint is made 1
l 22 why don't you go through the procedure with me 23 from when someone initially contacts you to I
24 what happens from then on.
25 A
When someone contacts us,'and a BULL & ASSOCIATES


V
V 9
.                                                            9 1 typical example would be by phone, we would 2 take down the specifics of the issues, get as 3 much information as we posslbly could from the 4 individual,   identify what the circumstances are 5 relative to if the issue has already been 6 addressed to management or whether the employee 7 is extremely concerned about confidentiality 8 and desires not to have their name involved in 9 it, that type of issao would be resolved.
1 typical example would be by phone, we would 2
10               Once we had that information and 11 understanding on confidentiality, we would look 12 at the appropriate resources within the company 13 to investigate it.     I have a staff reporting to 14 me that does a majority of the investigations.         l 15 However, there are a number of issues where the 16 othe:   ,rganizations within the company, such as 17 our internal auditing, or our security 1
take down the specifics of the issues, get as 3
18 department, or our equal employment opportunity 19 area, would be a more appropriate readily             .
much information as we posslbly could from the 4
1 20 available mechanism to address an issue.         So   l l
individual, identify what the circumstances are 5
21 we make that determination and then the 22 investigation is initiated.       If we are doing 23 the investigation we get in touch with the 24 appropriate people involved in the issue on all 25 sides of the management, employees, whoever           i f
relative to if the issue has already been 6
1 BULL & ASSOCIATES
addressed to management or whether the employee 7
is extremely concerned about confidentiality 8
and desires not to have their name involved in 9
it, that type of issao would be resolved.
10 Once we had that information and 11 understanding on confidentiality, we would look 12 at the appropriate resources within the company 13 to investigate it.
I have a staff reporting to 14 me that does a majority of the investigations.
15 However, there are a number of issues where the 16 othe:
,rganizations within the company, such as 17 our internal auditing, or our security 1
18 department, or our equal employment opportunity 19 area, would be a more appropriate readily 20 available mechanism to address an issue.
So 21 we make that determination and then the 22 investigation is initiated.
If we are doing 23 the investigation we get in touch with the 24 appropriate people involved in the issue on all 25 sides of the management, employees, whoever i
f BULL & ASSOCIATES


10 1             might be able to shed some relevant facts on 2               it.
10 1
3                           Based upcn the investigation, review 4               of documentation, whatever is available, we 5             make a determination on the allegation as to 6             whether there is a problem, not a problem.               If 7             there is, of course, . we would pursue with the 8               management and the affected area corrective 9               action. If there's not a problem we will 10               report that back to the individual who                             j 11
might be able to shed some relevant facts on 2
                                                                        ~
it.
contacted us if we know who they are.
3 Based upcn the investigation, review 4
12               Obviously an anonymous concern is a                                 !
of documentation, whatever is available, we 5
13               little more awkward, or less doable, unless                         ;
make a determination on the allegation as to 6
;-                              14               they call us back.                                                 )
whether there is a problem, not a problem.
i                               15                             Once we've reviewed it with the                       i i
If 7
                              '16               submitter,   if they are unable to identify                         l 17               anything that we have missed or express i
there is, of course,. we would pursue with the 8
                                                                                                                      )
management and the affected area corrective 9
l                               18               satisfaction then that would be the conclusion i                               19               it. Of course, if they identify a weakness in i
action.
j                             20               what we have looked at or lack of communication 21               or-whatever else, we would go back and do
If there's not a problem we will 10 report that back to the individual who j
                              ~22               additional investigation.       Ultimately we reach
11 contacted us if we know who they are.
;_                            23               a point where we are quite satisfied that the i
~
j                            24                 issue has been addressed appropriately, the 25                 corrective action has been taken, if 4
12 Obviously an anonymous concern is a 13 little more awkward, or less doable, unless 14 they call us back.
[                                                                   BULL & ASSOCIATES
)
  - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _          , - - - -        ,-      --          -- -          -  .n.. - - , -    -y p
i 15 Once we've reviewed it with the i
i
'16 submitter, if they are unable to identify 17 anything that we have missed or express
)
i l
18 satisfaction then that would be the conclusion i
19 it.
Of course, if they identify a weakness in i
j 20 what we have looked at or lack of communication 21 or-whatever else, we would go back and do
~22 additional investigation.
Ultimately we reach 23 a point where we are quite satisfied that the i
24 issue has been addressed appropriately, the j
25 corrective action has been taken, if 4
[
BULL & ASSOCIATES
.n..
-y p


  ~
~
1
1 11 1
  .                                                                                                        11 l
appropriate, and we would pursue closure of the l
1 appropriate, and we would pursue closure of the                                               .
2 concern through a review process which would 3
2 concern through a review process which would 3     include my review of the file.                             Historically                         -
include my review of the file.
4 there has been a 100 percent review of each 5
Historically 4
file by the law firm, a representative of the 6       law firm.           As of a few weeks ago that procedure                                       1 7
there has been a 100 percent review of each 5
was changed where we no longer have a 100                                                       '
file by the law firm, a representative of the 6
j              8       percent review by the law firm.
law firm.
9 Ultimately the concern would be 10
As of a few weeks ago that procedure 1
;-                    closed by a corporate officer's review of the 11 issues in response and then in certain cases it
7 was changed where we no longer have a 100 j
$            12 would even require the review and approval of                                                     ,
8 percent review by the law firm.
13       the member of our management council or the                                                       !
9 Ultimately the concern would be 10 closed by a corporate officer's review of the 11 issues in response and then in certain cases it 12 would even require the review and approval of 13 the member of our management council or the 14 senior management team in the company.
14
15 Examples of when management council members 16 would become involved would be if the submitter t
-                    senior management team in the company.                                                             '
17 were dissatisfied with the response we gave 18 them, they would receive all those concerns, 1
15       Examples of when management council members 16 t                    would become involved would be if the submitter 17 were dissatisfied with the response we gave 18 1
19 they would also see other concerns that we 20 identified as being of specific importance, j
them, they would receive all those concerns, 19 they would also see other concerns that we 20 identified as being of specific importance, j         21 or significance, in terms of the issue that was                                                     ,
21 or significance, in terms of the issue that was l
'        22       addressed.
22 addressed.
i 23                       Okay.
i 23 Q
Q And what is the law firm that j        24       reviews?
Okay.
1 25               A
And what is the law firm that 24 reviews?
.                                  It's Troutman and Sanders.
j 1
25 A
It's Troutman and Sanders.
O i
O i
BULL & ASSOCIATES r
BULL & ASSOCIATES r


i 40 1
40 i
i 1
i 1
1                                 cg3T Iy1C A T E 2                                                                                                                 i i
1 1
!                        3    GEORGIA:
cg3T Iy1C A T E l
i
2 i
!                        4    FULTON COUNTY:                                                                                             '
i 3
GEORGIA:
i 4
FULTON COUNTY:
i 1
i 1
5                   I hereby certify that the foregoing 6     deposition was stenographically recorded by me,           as stated in the caption.                         The deponent was                           !
5 I hereby certify that the foregoing 6
i                      7                                                                                                                ,
deposition was stenographically recorded by i
;                        8    duly sworn to tell the truth, the whole truth,                                                             ,
7 me, as stated in the caption.
i                                and nothing but the truth.                                 The colloquies, 9
The deponent was 8
10       statements, questions, and answers thereto 11     were reduced to typewriting under my direction 4                      12       and supervision; and the deposition is a true 13       and correct record of the testimony / evidence
duly sworn to tell the truth, the whole truth, i
!                      14       given by the deponent.
9 and nothing but the truth.
1 i                   15                     I further certify that I am not a I
The colloquies, 10 statements, questions, and answers thereto 11 were reduced to typewriting under my direction 12 and supervision; and the deposition is a true 4
16       relative, employee, attorney or counsel of any 1
13 and correct record of the testimony / evidence 14 given by the deponent.
l
i 15 I further certify that I am not a 1
<                      17       of the parties, nor am I financially interested 1
16 relative, employee, attorney or counsel of any I
l                     18       in this action.                                 /
1 l
4 Q1 19                    This      __2___ day        of M/ ''b??' gg,                           1990.
17 of the parties, nor am I financially interested 1
l                       20 t
l 18 in this action.
i                       21 22                                          V s t_C                     8                   -t' f
Q1
SUSAN 57 R                 bLD57~RIPIRII~~
/
23                                         Certified Court Reporter j
of M/
j (B-1231) and Notary Public.
''b??'
24                                         My commission expires August 24, 1991.
gg, 1990.
i                     25 i
4 19 This
__2___
day l
20 t
i 21 V s t_C 8
-t' 22 f
SUSAN 57 R bLD57~RIPIRII~~
j 23 Certified Court Reporter (B-1231) and Notary Public.
j 24 My commission expires August 24, 1991.
i 25 i
3 f
3 f
1 BULL & ASSOCIATES l
1 BULL & ASSOCIATES lr 1
r 1
~ -
    ~ - _ _ _ - - _ _ - - -}}
- - -}}

Latest revision as of 06:06, 13 December 2024

Intervenor Exhibit I-MOSBA-272,consisting of File Number 90-ERA-30 Transcript Re Deposition of LB Glenn
ML20100B765
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 10/11/1995
From:
LABOR, DEPT. OF
To:
References
OLA-3-I-MOS-272, NUDOCS 9601230136
Download: ML20100B765 (7)
v • d • e


Text

.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

-/ g g [ /) - 2 [ v I

  • Docket No. 50-424/425 OLA-3 EXHIBITNO.__M - M M

. g in the matter of Georale Power Co. et al.. Vcatie Uni'= 1 & 2 e6ew.Ofntervonor g9TC*n s

O staff O Appi: cant d a R.i.c* Ug" 5 e o inne.d o.a.

i~noler win..

1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE U.S.

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 2

0FFICE C SECRETARV DOCKET E t :ERY!Ci; 3

MAPVIN B.

HOBBY,

)

IM '

)

1 Complainant,

) CIVIL ACTION

)

5 vs.

) FILE NO.

)

6 GEORGIA POWER. COMPANY,

) 90-ERA-30

)

7 Respondent.

)

8 9

10 11

.12 l

13 14 DEPOSITION OF 15 LEE BROWN GLENN 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 BULL & ASSOCIATES COURT AND DEPOSITION REPORTERS 24 4651 Roswell Road, N.E.,

Suite F-504 Atlanta, Georgia 30342 25 (404) 256-2886 BULL & ASSOCIATES 9601230136 951011 PDR ADOCK 05000424 PDR

,~

'xs l '

s I

2 1

Deposition of LEE BROWN GLENN 2

taken on behalf of the' Comp _ainant, 3

for the purpose of discovery, upon 4

cross-examination, before Susan E.

5 Reynolds, Registered Professional 6

Reporter, Certified Court Reporter 7

and Notary Public, at the Candler 8

Building, 127 Peachtree Street, 9

N.E.,

Suite 1400, Atlanta, Georgia, i

10 commencing at approximately 11 10:00 a.m.,

Thursday, August 23, 12 1990.

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2 5 --

n,,,,

.cnnn..mme

I'

\\

8 1

A No, I do not.

1 Q

Okay.

What is the corporate 3

concerns procedure?

Is it a manual?

4 A

It is one of any number of 5

procedures in the corporate guidelines, 6

procedures and guidelines, which the company l

7 issues and keeps up-to-date.

In addition to 1

8

that, I will say that we have an internal 9

operating procedure which gets into more 10 specifics on how we do things.

So maybe I 11 should differentiate between the two.

There is 12 a corporate concern procedure in the corporate 13 guicelines.

T1 e is an internal procedure 14 that we use that governs our day-to-day i

i 15 operations.

i 16 Q

Are you familiar enough with the l

17 internal operating procedure where you can tell 18 me what it is rather than having to refresh 19 your recollection with the documents?

20 A

I believe so, yes.

i 21 Q

All right.

If a complaint is made 1

l 22 why don't you go through the procedure with me 23 from when someone initially contacts you to I

24 what happens from then on.

25 A

When someone contacts us,'and a BULL & ASSOCIATES

V 9

1 typical example would be by phone, we would 2

take down the specifics of the issues, get as 3

much information as we posslbly could from the 4

individual, identify what the circumstances are 5

relative to if the issue has already been 6

addressed to management or whether the employee 7

is extremely concerned about confidentiality 8

and desires not to have their name involved in 9

it, that type of issao would be resolved.

10 Once we had that information and 11 understanding on confidentiality, we would look 12 at the appropriate resources within the company 13 to investigate it.

I have a staff reporting to 14 me that does a majority of the investigations.

15 However, there are a number of issues where the 16 othe:

,rganizations within the company, such as 17 our internal auditing, or our security 1

18 department, or our equal employment opportunity 19 area, would be a more appropriate readily 20 available mechanism to address an issue.

So 21 we make that determination and then the 22 investigation is initiated.

If we are doing 23 the investigation we get in touch with the 24 appropriate people involved in the issue on all 25 sides of the management, employees, whoever i

f BULL & ASSOCIATES

10 1

might be able to shed some relevant facts on 2

it.

3 Based upcn the investigation, review 4

of documentation, whatever is available, we 5

make a determination on the allegation as to 6

whether there is a problem, not a problem.

If 7

there is, of course,. we would pursue with the 8

management and the affected area corrective 9

action.

If there's not a problem we will 10 report that back to the individual who j

11 contacted us if we know who they are.

~

12 Obviously an anonymous concern is a 13 little more awkward, or less doable, unless 14 they call us back.

)

i 15 Once we've reviewed it with the i

i

'16 submitter, if they are unable to identify 17 anything that we have missed or express

)

i l

18 satisfaction then that would be the conclusion i

19 it.

Of course, if they identify a weakness in i

j 20 what we have looked at or lack of communication 21 or-whatever else, we would go back and do

~22 additional investigation.

Ultimately we reach 23 a point where we are quite satisfied that the i

24 issue has been addressed appropriately, the j

25 corrective action has been taken, if 4

[

BULL & ASSOCIATES

.n..

-y p

~

1 11 1

appropriate, and we would pursue closure of the l

2 concern through a review process which would 3

include my review of the file.

Historically 4

there has been a 100 percent review of each 5

file by the law firm, a representative of the 6

law firm.

As of a few weeks ago that procedure 1

7 was changed where we no longer have a 100 j

8 percent review by the law firm.

9 Ultimately the concern would be 10 closed by a corporate officer's review of the 11 issues in response and then in certain cases it 12 would even require the review and approval of 13 the member of our management council or the 14 senior management team in the company.

15 Examples of when management council members 16 would become involved would be if the submitter t

17 were dissatisfied with the response we gave 18 them, they would receive all those concerns, 1

19 they would also see other concerns that we 20 identified as being of specific importance, j

21 or significance, in terms of the issue that was l

22 addressed.

i 23 Q

Okay.

And what is the law firm that 24 reviews?

j 1

25 A

It's Troutman and Sanders.

O i

BULL & ASSOCIATES r

40 i

i 1

1 1

cg3T Iy1C A T E l

2 i

i 3

GEORGIA:

i 4

FULTON COUNTY:

i 1

5 I hereby certify that the foregoing 6

deposition was stenographically recorded by i

7 me, as stated in the caption.

The deponent was 8

duly sworn to tell the truth, the whole truth, i

9 and nothing but the truth.

The colloquies, 10 statements, questions, and answers thereto 11 were reduced to typewriting under my direction 12 and supervision; and the deposition is a true 4

13 and correct record of the testimony / evidence 14 given by the deponent.

i 15 I further certify that I am not a 1

16 relative, employee, attorney or counsel of any I

1 l

17 of the parties, nor am I financially interested 1

l 18 in this action.

Q1

/

of M/

b??'

gg, 1990.

4 19 This

__2___

day l

20 t

i 21 V s t_C 8

-t' 22 f

SUSAN 57 R bLD57~RIPIRII~~

j 23 Certified Court Reporter (B-1231) and Notary Public.

j 24 My commission expires August 24, 1991.

i 25 i

3 f

1 BULL & ASSOCIATES lr 1

~ -

- - -

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20100B765&oldid=4311531"