ML20199G154

Suggests That Actions Listed in Encl Be Incorporated Into Actions Required Sections of Individual Qa/Qc Categories of Qa/Qc Suppl Rept on Sser 7

ML20199G154
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak, 05000000
Issue date:	04/25/1985
From:	Marinos E NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
To:	Noonan V NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
Shared Package
ML20197J178	List: IR 05000445/1985009 ML20197J173 ML20197J273 ML20197J296 ML20199G064 ML20199G070 ML20199G083 ML20199G092 ML20199G099 ML20199G107 ML20199G116 ML20199G119 ML20199G124 ML20199G133 ML20199G146 ML20199G154 ML20199G163 ML20199G179 ML20199G212 ML20199G284 ML20199G292 ML20199G298 ML20199G306 ML20199G318 ML20199G331 ML20199G343 ML20199G352 ML20199G363 ML20199G383 ML20199G391 ML20199G402 ML20199G420 ML20199G432 ML20199G442 ML20199G453 ML20199G464 ML20199G575 ML20199G614 ML20199G620 ML20199G624 ML20199G630 ML20199G635 ML20199G641 ML20199G645 ML20199G649 ML20199G655 ML20199G661 ML20199G670 ML20199G675 ML20199G681 ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59 NUDOCS 8606250104
Download: ML20199G154 (4)

Text

+

3 ag r

UNITED STATES

\\

L I

l.

,E g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[

g j

WASHINGTON, D C. 20555

\\;*\\CR,/

APR 251se5

/

MEMORANDUM FOR: Vincent S. Noonan, Director Comanche Peak Project l

L THRU:

Jose A. Calvo, Manager jffC.

Electrical / Operations Group Comanche Peak Project FROM:

Evangelos C. Marinos, Deputy

]

Electrical / Operations Group 3

Comanche Peak Project

+ -

y-

.wr-

+

i

SUBJECT:

INTEGRATION OF ELECTRICAL FINDINGS

(,

WITH QA/QC FINDINGS g'

. :,,. g

-t.m:

.y

. = _

References:

Memorandum for V. Noonan from H. Livermore.

Subject:

Oversights and Omissions in Supplement i

Nos. 7 and 8 RE; QA/QC undated.

j Note' Ed'Her5str :.Tierrmure fruirr i. R. 'siurxtriger -

=

l

Subject:

Supplement Nos. Tand 8 Reference to QA/QC SSER, dated March 8, 1985.

.)-l/

We have reviewed the coments transmitted in the referenced memoranda regard-ing the integration of Electrical / Instrumentation and Test Program findings l

of SSER 7 with findings from the QA/QC supplement report.

During F.paration of SSER 7 which precides the QA/QC supplement it was j

understood that QA/QC would integrate findings from other technical groups.

1 On that basis,various sections of SSER 7 were structured to refer to appropri-J ate sections oflthe QA/QC supplement thought to address more broadly a parti-j cular issue. The reference memoranda, however, and discussions with QA/QC group staff reveal that the QA/QC supplement will cover a more limited scope l

making referenc'e to findings not fully compatible.

i j

Therefore, in the interest of preserving consistency in our reports and to avoid unnecessary revisions to SSER 7, we suggest that the QA/QC supplement incorporate in the " Actions Required" sections of the individual QA/QC L

categories the actions offered in the enclosure. Other minor comments of

-ttie referenced memoranda do not require any action on our part. -

)

With regard to the proposed transfer of allegations t areas, our search indicate L

8606250104 860611 PDR FOIA PDR.

GARDE 85-59 g-.

~

= L 3 -. - -

T

~

~

c.,

. APR 2 51935 I

(

V. Noonan.

I Issue AQ-67 is not related to either area. We therefore d

conclude that all the concerns raised in the referenced memoranda regarding the l

Electrical / Instrumentation and Test areas have been adequately covered with this transmittal.

t h -~

'Evangelo.,

. Marinos D5puty' h,y~.ey w

sc....

.t.. - -

c.m:w.g.2, '.yc Electrical / Operations -Group t-Comanche Peak Project 4

'. J.

g. n.

l'k..;-)V -.cc:. TR.T-Group Managers y,.c., a g-5.p ~

' -~

. H T H. - Livemore.

' ~

~

I ' + -

' ~; :

~f A..Vietti m --':

' +-

. g ; :--

• R. L Tang-

~

~ ~ ~

~

• 4...

1 P?

"/

a

=

i

~

aLL %f ww f3 M 'b L

1 e

^

~ - - Y t

9.,

.c APR 2 51985

~

t l.

t3 l-t ENCLOSURE k

i QA/QC Section Actions Required

\\

Category 8 "As-Built" Deficiencies in the area of craft 1l'7

~I personnel' training, identified in G..

a + t:.,,

7-::

2.w...

.. pe :.

- gg;6m

., _ ; ;.

,-:. a the Electrical / Instrumentation ~

1.

j;g g a.yM(g-%

. Category 3. "Electricil Equipuent

-i?;;/wn-

~

y? - ~

'6 k,.

.. Separation " Category J " Cable

. w..

_.e-o

.. p.,

Installation, and Category 8, i

ETectricaf Fracedures"shalT"be l

integrated with other actions of l

"as-built" deficiencies.

\\l 7.o Category 4, " Training and Concerns regarding QC inspector Qualification."

training, identified in the i

Electrical / Instrumentation I

Category 6, " Electrical Quality i

r.

Control (QC) Inspector Training /

\\

l Qualifications," shall be t

integrated with other actions j.

f pertaining to " Training and 6

0 Qualification."

~

1 i

.x.c=.--

J y

z-*g-

• s"?

~

APR 2 51995

-,e My IROC Section Actions Required

. s~

rj 5, "Nonconfonnance Concerns reg'arding in'-process

?55 g-

4:-e sr. -

inspections,. identified in the

.n.v Electrical / Instrumentation

]

%j.j;;...

~E=

~

j 7

7v,,

Category'9, " Electrical Inspection

[

' '*t?A "'

Reports,'Irispection Item Removal v?;g,_ ;:

]

N.,J -

Notices and In-Process g

Inspections," shall be integrated zg

.g.

with actions pertaining to c,:r i

.pg',--

"Nonconfo'nnance Reports."

,g g

' T.Cd.

}

s a

rgp bramor,i 4, " Training and Concerns regarding adequacy of i

OW f':niens."

qualification of preoperational test personnel, identified in s

us.

the Test Program Category 4, au

~

TM

" Prerequisite Testing," shall be

"~

c integrated with other actions

[

pertaining to " Testing and v

Qualifications."

i t

p I

E:

• s mee UNITED STATES g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o

l f,

.j wAsHWGTON. D. C. 20665 g

i

\\,*****/

N 8 19 %

j Note to: Herbert Liverwore s

QA/QC Group Leader From:

T. R. Workinger, TRT

]

j

Subject:

Supplement Nos. 7 and 8 Reference to

}

QA/QC SSER I have gone through Supplement No.7 " Electrical / Instrumentation and Test f

Programs", and Supplement No. 8, " Civil and Structural and Miscellaneous j

Issues", to identify references to related issues that are stated to be, or are implied to be, further addressed in the_ QA/QC SSER, which you are preparing. The related reference issues are highlighted in yellow in the enclosed copies of Supplement Nos. 7 and 8.

s

(

The principle issues and page numbers are also identified in Attachment 1.

]

Those page numbers that are marked with an asterisk also comit the NRC to the i

preparation of an additional supplement to complete the evaluation of an issue in the respective individual SSER -- based, in part upon the findings of the i

QA/QC Group. Note, however, that only the issue of page J-33, electrical A

cable tray support welds, is specifically addressed in the QA/QC draft SSER.

Cross reference to the QA/QC SSER contained in the Test Programs and Miscellaneous sections of Supplement Nos. 7 and 8 do not appear to present any

(

problems.

jm g/gsw T.R.Workingek

{

c: w/ attachment 1 J. Calvo L. Shao i

't.C. Tang Keimig

'Jiunter

.,,:~ :~onan L

l

. s.i w a,,w - qu(6 i

...... Rj g7 t "

,8

.=,

.c. :

g 1

• s g

\\

h, t

[

~

l Attachment I f

Supplement No. 7 -

{

Electrical / Instrumentation and Test Program y

[

Page No.

Reference Issue J-9(J-10 Lack of programatic controT of the electrical QC inspection qualification program, which may be indicative of inadequate i

also qualification for some electrical QC ins ectors.- (QA/QC I

J-58 Category 4, " Training and Qualification".

J-14 4J-( The TRT cannot conclude with reasonable assurance that the J-95 document control system problems had no adverse effect on testing activities.

J-16 This action shall be integrated with other actions concerning g

J-65 craft personnel training addressed under QA/QC Category 8. "As i

Buil t".

J-33 The inspection of electrical cable tray support welds is j

addressed under QA/QC Category 8, "As Built".

3 1

J-33 The lack of awareness of procedures by craft personnel [QC

/

J-35 inspectors] may be indicative of poor training in the area of I

J-43 procedural requirements. Similar findings in other I

construction crafts are addressed under QA/QC Category 8 "As

'Buil t".

J-47 The TRT further concludes that the lack of analysis to substantiate the adequacy of the seismic design installations inspected may be a weakness in the QA/QC program concerning design control. This area is addressed unde _r QA/QC Category 1,

" Design Process".

/

• /

J-53 The results of this evaluation [ disposition of electrical nonconformance reports] will be further ass'essed as part of the overall programatic review of all NCRs, addressed under QA/QC Category 5 "Nonconfonnance Reports", and under f

Category 6, "QC Inspections."

J-59 This area [ cable splices in raceways] is further addressed under QA/QC Category 8 "As Built".

g l

• /

Comits NRC to prepare a supplement to this SSER; based, in part, upon the findings of the QA/QC Group.

)

4

4 t

m.

x.

I s.,,.

[

2-I Page No.

Reference Issue

• /

J-66 The results of this evaluation [ electrical equipment j

installation problems) will be further assessed as part of the overall programatic review concerning the post-construction J

verification program addressed under QA/QC Category 8, "As i

Built".

J-68II The results of this evaluation [ electrical irs and IRNs] will be further assessed as part of the overall programmatic review i

of TUEC's deficiency identification program in-process j

inspections addressed under QA/QC Category 5, "Nonconformance Reports".

1 J-88 The results of the evaluation pertaining to inadequate I

qualifications of preoperational test personnel [not qualified to ANSI N45.2.6 standards] will be further assessed as part of the overall programmatic review concerning procedures addressed under QA/QC Category 4, " Training and Qualification".

J l

i l

4 5

i

}

ll l

1 l

• j Comits NRC to prepare a supplement to this SSER; based, in part, upon the findings of the QA/QC Group.

l t

p h.

~

.s

. t Supplement No. 8 Civil and Structural and Miscellaneous Issues Page No.

Reference Issue I

K-37 The statement in Attachment D [to the CASE letter of 11-20-84]

1 that all retesting which had been promised had not been carried out is a quality assurance matter, not a safety problem..and it il will be investigated by the TRT QA/QC Group.

• /

K-38 The results of the evaluation pertaining to the p'lacement of 4

K-42 concrete without QA/QC involvement, the response for improving i

protection when field-cured cylinders showed inadequate strength, and the failure to carry out promised retests will be i

j further assessed as part of the overall review concerning j

procedures addressed under QA/QC Category 6. "QC Inspections".

K-45 The TRT... found no evidence of grout failure. The K-47 possibility of premature loading will be assessed as part of the overall progrannatic review concerning procedures addressed under QA/QC Category 6. "QC Inspections".

K-91f i

K-56r The results of these evaluations which pertain to QC rebar placement and receipt inspection procedures [and unauthorized rebar cutting] will be further assessed as a part of the overall progransnatic review concerning procedures addressed under QA/QC Category 6. "QC Inspections".

• /

K-58 The lack of QC inspection [ uncontrolled repair] will be further assessed as a part of the progrannatic review concerning procedures addressed under QA/QC Category 6, "QC Inspections".

I j

K-69 /

The results of these evaluations [R.W. Hunt inspector qualification] will be further assessed as a part of the

,j overall progrannatic review concerning inspector qualifications addressed under QA/QC Category 4, " Training and Qualifications".

3 li K-74r/

The effectiveness of quality control in the [ Hunt concrete 3

K-96 j test] laboratory will be further assessed as part of the P

overall progrannatic review concerning procedures addressed

]

under QA/QC Category 6. "QC Inspections".

9 K-128 These findings are based on the technical assessment perfonned by the Miscellaneous Group; some of these findings appear to differ from those made by the TRT's QA/QC Group, whici 1

evaluated the same components from a different technical perspective.

i

• /

Connits NRC to prepare a supplement to this SSER; based, in part, upon the findings of the QA/QC Group.

_u_

.__ =_

. ~ -

i I

g = =.y(0 UNITED STATES e

o p

l 8

3 y,( i g NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION g

./- l WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

%,', l,, **

NAR 151985 MEMORANDUM FOR:

T. R. Workinger, TRT FROM:

D. C. Jeng, Civil / Structural Subgroup Comanche Peak TRT

SUBJECT:

SUPPLEMENT N0. 8 REFERENCES TO QA/QC SSER 1

l

REFERENCE:

March 8,198S Memo from T. R. Workinger to H. Livermore, QA/QC Group Leader l

The Civil / Structural Staff has reviewed the list of issues requiring further QA/QC review as identified by you from the Civil / Structural SSERs in j

Supplement No. 8 (Attachment 1 to the reference). We believe that this list i

should be expanded to include the five additional issues provided in the enclosure to this memorandum.

If you have any questions, please contact T. Langowski at 443-7966 or D. Jeng at 443-7974.

mc D. C. Jeng, C ructural Subgroup, TRT

Enclosure:

As stated l

l cc: w/ enc 1.

V. Noonan J. Calvo l

L. Shao

!l R. C. Tang l J R. Keinig 1 e H. Livermore-D. Hunter I

R. Philleo l

C. Hofmeyer i

J. Devers l

T. Langowski

- m,,,

'L./ G Iy v y,i ;

)

e.-

N u

\\

-== J

~

MAR 151985 f

ENCLOSURE 1

pp K-29 */ The results of the evaluation pertaining to lack of laboratory signatures on batch tickets will be further assessed as part of the overall programmatic review,concerning procedures under QA/QC Category 6 "QC Inspection."

I pp K-42 */ The results of the evaluation pertaining to inadequate consoli-dation of concrete will be further assessed as part of the over-all programmatic review concerning procedures under QA/QC Category 6 "QC Inspection."

pp K-64 */ The results of these evaluations pertaining to QC inspection procedures (falsification) will be further assessed as a part of the overall programmatic review concerning procedures addressed under QA/QC Category 3 " Records".

n pp K-84 This (control room ceiling design) would indicate failu're of the quality assurance program to ensure that applicable provisions of Regulatory Guide 1.29 were fully met.

l pp K-96 */ The results of this evaluation pertaining to QC controls at the i

batch plant will be further assessed as part of the overall programmatic review concerning procedures addressed under QA/QC i

Category 6 "QC Inspection."

i

• / Commits NRC to prepare a supplement to this SSER; based, in part, upon i

i the findings of the QA/QC Group.

l l

l l

\\

i 6

1

(

8O k

).

P MPWN

y j

g-

'g UNITED STATES 8

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION h

t.'.e"49

{

- wasswovow, n. c.zosos i

F i

g.....

2i.

/

A g

gg v y vg -

[ _ l; k m

~

f Note to: Herbert Livermore QA/QC Group Leader

(

D t

Ab'L From:

. T. R. Workinger, TRT.

~

Subject:

-Supplement Nos. 7 and 8 Reference to QA/QC SSER I

I have gone through Supplement No.7, " Electrical / Instrumentation and Test Programs", and Supplement No. 8. " Civil and Structural and Miscellaneous Issues", to identify references to related issues that are stated to be, or are implied to be, further addressed in the QA/QC SSER, which you are preparing. The related reference issues are highlighted in yellow in the l

enclosed copies of Supplement Nos. 7 and 8.

The principle issues and page numbers are also identified in Attachment 1.

Those page numbers that are marked with an asterisk also comit the NRC to the preparation of an additional supplement to complete the evaluation of an issue in the respective individual SSER -- based, in part upon the findings of the QA/QC Group. Note, however, that only the issue of page J-33, electrical j

cable tray support welds, is specifically addressed in the QA/QC araft sstR.

Cross reference to the QA/QC SSER contained in the Test Programs and 1

Miscellaneous sections of Supplement Nos. 7 and 8 do not appear to present any E

pr6blems. ~

l

?

dhnA?@&

l T.R. Workinge c: w/ attachment 1 l'

J. Calvo i

L. Shao i

• t.C. Tang

.Keimig l

Munter

i.,:

onan w

g.

O ab,

i_

.hr.idtN*it/R ~fdb

.y.Yl {4'Q;7.~ ~

\\

.. ~.,..

t m

g-

.,y 4

4 g

1 I.

Y p[

1.

t i

i Attachment I r

Supplement No. 7 -

[

Electrical / Instrumentation and Test Program Page No.

Reference Issue Y

J-9 ( J-lo Lack of programmatic control of the electrical QC inspection qualification program, which may be indicative of inadequate j

also qualificatien for some electrical QC inspectors.

(QA/QC

]

J-58 Category 4. " Training and Qualification").

J-14 AJ-( The TRT cannot conclude with reasonable assurance that the i

J-95 document control system problems had no adverse effect on 2

testing activities.

.l J-16 This action shall be integrated with other actions concerning J-65 craft personnel training addressed under QA/QC Category 8, "As

)

Built".

i J-33 The inspection of electrical cable tray support welds is addressed under QA/QC Category 8, "As Built".

a 4

J-33 The lack of awareness of procedures by craft personnel [QC I

J-35 inspectors] may be indicative of poor training in the area of i

J-43 procedural requirements. Similar findings in other construction crafts are addressed under QA/QC Category 8, "As i

Built".

i J-47 The TRT further concludes that the lack of analysis to i

substantiate the adequacy of the seismic design installations 1

inspected may be a weakness in the QA/QC program concerning design control. This area is addressed under QA/QC Category 1,

" Design Process".

• /

J-53 The results of this evaluation [ disposition of electrical nonconformance reports] will be further assessed as part of the overall programatic review of all NCRs, addressed under T

QA/QC Category 5 "Nonconformance Reports", and under Category 6, "QC Inspections."

J-59 This area [ cable splices in raceways] is further addressed under QA/t)C Category 8. "As Built".

/

Comits NRC to prepare a supplement to this SSER; based, in part, upon the findings of the QA/QC. Group.

O 9

=

r j t e

Page No.

Reference Issue J-66 /

The results of this evaluation [ electrical equipment i

installation problems] will be further assessed as part of the q

overall programmatic review concerning the post-construction verification program addressed under QA/QC Category 8, "As Built".

h J-68Il The results of this evaluation [ electrical irs and IRNs] will be further assessed as part of the overall programmatic review g

of TUEC's deficiency identification program in-process j

inspections addressed under QA/QC Category 5, "Nonconformance 1

Reports".

4

)

J-88 The results of the evaluation pertaining to inadequate 1

qualifications of preoperational test personnel [not qualified 1

to ANSI N45.2.6 standards] will be further assessed as part of 7

the overall programmatic review concerning procedures addressed under QA/QC Category 4, " Training and Qualification".

l 1i 1

4 4

L l

• /

Commits NRC to prepare a supplement to this SSER; based, in part, upon the findings of the QA/QC Group.

e

• h* T'y

i o

, Supplement No. 8 Civil and Structural and Miscellaneous Issues c

Page No.

Reference Issue K-37 The statement in Attachment D [to the CASE letter of 11-20-84]

that all retesting which had been promised had not been carried out is a quality assurance matter, not a safety problem, and it will be investigated by the TRT QA/QC Group.

• /

K-38 The results of the evaluation pertaining to the placement of K-42 concrete without QA/QC involvement, the response for improving i

protection when field-cured cylinders showed inadequate strength, and the failure to carry out promised retests will be j

further assessed as part of the overall review concerning j

procedures addressed under QA/QC Category 6. "QC Inspections".

K-45 The TRT... found no eviden'ce of grout failure. The K-47 possibility of premature loading will be assessed as part of the overall programatic review concerning procedures addressed under QA/QC Category 6. "QC Inspections".

K-56hj The results of these evaluations which pertain to QC rebar I

K placementandreceiptinspectionprocedures[andunauthorized j

rebar cutting] will be further assessed as a part of the 1

overall programatic review concerning procedures addressed l

under QA/QC Category 6. "QC Inspections".

• /

K-58 The lack of QC inspection [ uncontrolled repair] will be further assessed as a part of the programatic review concerning procedures addressed under QA/QC Category 6, "QC Inspections".

• /

J K-69 The results of these evaluations [R.W. Hunt inspector qualification] will be further assessed as a part of the overall programatic review concerning inspector qualifications addressed under QA/QC Category 4. " Training and Qualifications".

K-74h The effectiveness of quality control in the [ Hunt concrete K-96 f test] laboratory will be further assessed as part of the overall programatic review concerning procedures addressed under QA/QC Category 6 "QC Inspections".

K-128 These findings are based on the tec5nical tssessment performed by the Miscellaneous Group; some of these findir3s appear to differ from those made by the TRT's QA/QC Group, which evaluated the same components from a different technical perspective.

• j,Comits NRC to prepare a supplement to this SSER; based, in part, upon the findings of the QA/QC Group.

1

,7 h*

~......

o, uult r o sT ATri

).

i NUOL! Ali HE GUlt. TORY COMMISSION i

{

y, 6 g

e, %

. l r.w smc.1or. toe w.s a

k he....*

NAR 1 5 365 1

MEMORANDUM FOR:. T. R. Workinger, TR1 lv FROM:

D. C. Jeno. Civil / Structural Subgroup

{

Comanche Febt TR1

SUBJECT:

SUPPLEMEN1 NO. 8 REFErl.ENCES 10 QA/QC SSER

REFERENCE:

March 8,1985 Memp from T. R. Werfinger to H, Livermore, 3

L QA/QC Group Leader The Civil / Structural Staff has reviewed the list of issues reqpiring further j,

QA/QC review as identified by you from the Civil / Structural SSERs in r

Supplement No. 3 (Attachment 1 to the reference). We believe that this list should be expanded to include the tive additional issues provided in the enclosure to this memorandum.

If you have any questions, please centact l

T..Langowski at 443-7966 or D. Jeng at 443-7974.

f j

mc D. C. Jeng, C ructural Subgroup, TRT

Enclosure:

As stated s

A-cc.: w/ enc 1.

V. Noonan J. Cr,1vo L. Shao R. C. Tang R. Keimig H. Livermore-D. Hunter R. Philleo C. Hofmeyer J. Devers T. Langowski f

i 1

oiJde2 M h mWrwf 'T' 4

Ii A

1

~

f.

I IIAR 151985 ENCLOSURE a

l, y

pp K-29 */ The results of the evaluation pertaining to lack of laboratory signatures on batch tickets will be further assessed as part of f

the overall programmatic review concerning procedures under QA/QC Category 6 "QC Inspection."

pp K-42 */ The results of the evaluation pertaining to inadequate consoli-dation of concrete will be further assessed as part of the over-all programmatic review concerning procedures under QA/QC Category 6 "QC Inspection."

pp K-64 */ The results of these evaluations pertaining to QC inspection f.

procedures (falsification) will be further assessed as a part of the overall programmatic review concerning procedures addressed under QA/QC Category 3 " Records".

pp K-84 This (control room ceiling design) would indicate failure of the quality assurance program to ensure that applicable provisions y

of Regulatory Guide 1.29 were fully met.

pp K-96 */ The results of this evaluation pertaining to QC controls at the batch plant will be further assessed as part of the overall programatic review concerning procedures addressed under QA/QC Category 6 "QC Inspection."

b

• / Commits NRC to prepare a supplement to this SSER; based, in part, upon

[

the findings of the QA/QC Group.

ll-c T.

I Y

t I

d i

4.

t

-