|
|
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) |
Line 17: |
Line 17: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:ATTACHMENT 3 Markup of Technical Specification Bases Pages (for information only) | | {{#Wiki_filter:ATTACHMENT 3 Markup of Technical Specification Bases Pages (for information only) |
|
| |
|
| RCS P/T Limits B 3.4.11 B 3.4 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM (RCS) | | RCS P/T Limits B 3.4.11 LaSalle 1 and 2 B 3.4.11-1 Revision 50 B 3.4 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM (RCS) |
| B 3.4.11 RCS Pressure and Temperature (P/T) Limits BASES BACKGROUND All components of the RCS are designed to withstand effects of cyclic loads due to system pressure and temperature changes. These loads are introduced by startup (heatup) and shutdown (cooldown) operations, power transients, and reactor trips. This LCO limits the pressure and temperature changes during RCS heatup and cooldown, within the design assumptions and the stress limits for cyclic operation. | | B 3.4.11 RCS Pressure and Temperature (P/T) Limits BASES BACKGROUND All components of the RCS are designed to withstand effects of cyclic loads due to system pressure and temperature changes. These loads are introduced by startup (heatup) and shutdown (cooldown) operations, power transients, and reactor trips. This LCO limits the pressure and temperature changes during RCS heatup and cooldown, within the design assumptions and the stress limits for cyclic operation. |
| The Specification contains P/T limit curves for heatup, cooldown, inservice leak and hydrostatic testing, and criticality and also limits the maximum rate of change of reactor coolant temperature. The P/T limit curves are applicable for 32 effective full power years. | | The Specification contains P/T limit curves for heatup, cooldown, inservice leak and hydrostatic testing, and criticality and also limits the maximum rate of change of reactor coolant temperature. The P/T limit curves are applicable for 32 effective full power years. |
| 54 Each P/T limit curve defines an acceptable region for normal operation. The usual use of the curves is operational guidance during heatup or cooldown maneuvering, when pressure and temperature indications are monitored and compared to the applicable curve to determine that operation is within the allowable region.
| | Each P/T limit curve defines an acceptable region for normal operation. The usual use of the curves is operational guidance during heatup or cooldown maneuvering, when pressure and temperature indications are monitored and compared to the applicable curve to determine that operation is within the allowable region. |
| The LCO establishes operating limits that provide a margin to brittle failure of the reactor vessel and piping of the reactor coolant pressure boundary (RCPB). The vessel is the component most subject to brittle failure. Therefore, the LCO limits apply mainly to the vessel. | | The LCO establishes operating limits that provide a margin to brittle failure of the reactor vessel and piping of the reactor coolant pressure boundary (RCPB). The vessel is the component most subject to brittle failure. Therefore, the LCO limits apply mainly to the vessel. |
| 10 CFR 50, Appendix G (Ref. 1), requires the establishment of P/T limits for material fracture toughness requirements of the RCPB materials. Reference 1 requires an adequate margin to brittle failure during normal operation, anticipated operational occurrences, and system hydrostatic tests. It mandates the use of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code, Section III, Appendix G (Ref. 2). | | 10 CFR 50, Appendix G (Ref. 1), requires the establishment of P/T limits for material fracture toughness requirements of the RCPB materials. Reference 1 requires an adequate margin to brittle failure during normal operation, anticipated operational occurrences, and system hydrostatic tests. It mandates the use of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code, Section III, Appendix G (Ref. 2). |
| The actual shift in the RTNDT of the vessel material will be established periodically by removing and evaluating the irradiated reactor vessel material specimens, in accordance with ASTM E 185 (Ref. 3) and 10 CFR 50, Appendix H (continued) | | The actual shift in the RTNDT of the vessel material will be established periodically by removing and evaluating the irradiated reactor vessel material specimens, in accordance with ASTM E 185 (Ref. 3) and 10 CFR 50, Appendix H (continued) 54 |
| LaSalle 1 and 2 B 3.4.11-1 Revision 50
| |
|
| |
|
| RCS P/T Limits B 3.4.11 BASES APPLICABLE P/T limits are not derived from any DBA, there are no SAFETY ANALYSES acceptance limits related to the P/T limits. Rather, the (continued) P/T limits are acceptance limits themselves since they preclude operation in an unanalyzed condition. | | RCS P/T Limits B 3.4.11 LaSalle 1 and 2 B 3.4.11-3 Revision 13 BASES APPLICABLE P/T limits are not derived from any DBA, there are no SAFETY ANALYSES acceptance limits related to the P/T limits. Rather, the (continued) |
| | P/T limits are acceptance limits themselves since they preclude operation in an unanalyzed condition. |
| RCS P/T limits satisfy Criterion 2 of 10 CFR 50.36(c)(2)(ii). | | RCS P/T limits satisfy Criterion 2 of 10 CFR 50.36(c)(2)(ii). |
| LCO The elements of this LCO are: | | LCO The elements of this LCO are: |
| : a. RCS pressure and temperature are within the limits the PTLR specified in Figures 3.4.11-1, 3.4.11-2, 3.4.11-3, 3.4.11-4, 3.4.11-5, and 3.4.11-6, heatup and cooldown rates are 100F in any 1 hour period during RCS heatup, cooldown, and inservice leak and hydrostatic within the limits specified testing, and the RCS temperature change during system in the PTLR leakage and hydrostatic testing is 20F in any 1 hour period when the RCS temperature and pressure are not within the limits of Figure 3.4.11-2 and 3.4.11-5 as applicable; within the limits specified in the b. The temperature difference between the reactor vessel PTLR bottom head coolant and the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) coolant is 145F during recirculation pump startup in MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4; within the limits
| | a. |
| : c. The temperature difference between the reactor coolant specified in the in the respective recirculation loop and in the PTLR reactor vessel is 50F during recirculation pump startup in MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4; the PTLR
| | RCS pressure and temperature are within the limits specified in Figures 3.4.11-1, 3.4.11-2, 3.4.11-3, 3.4.11-4, 3.4.11-5, and 3.4.11-6, heatup and cooldown rates are 100F in any 1 hour period during RCS heatup, cooldown, and inservice leak and hydrostatic testing, and the RCS temperature change during system leakage and hydrostatic testing is 20F in any 1 hour period when the RCS temperature and pressure are not within the limits of Figure 3.4.11-2 and 3.4.11-5 as applicable; b. |
| : d. RCS pressure and temperature are within the applicable criticality limits specified in Figures 3.4.11-3 and 3.4.11-6, prior to achieving criticality; and within the limits e. The reactor vessel flange and the head flange specified in the temperatures are 72F for Unit 1 and 86F for Unit PTLR 2 when tensioning the reactor vessel head bolting studs and when the reactor head is tensioned.
| | The temperature difference between the reactor vessel bottom head coolant and the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) coolant is 145F during recirculation pump startup in MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4; c. |
| | The temperature difference between the reactor coolant in the respective recirculation loop and in the reactor vessel is 50F during recirculation pump startup in MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4; d. |
| | RCS pressure and temperature are within the applicable criticality limits specified in Figures 3.4.11-3 and 3.4.11-6, prior to achieving criticality; and e. |
| | The reactor vessel flange and the head flange temperatures are 72F for Unit 1 and 86F for Unit 2 when tensioning the reactor vessel head bolting studs and when the reactor head is tensioned. |
| These limits define allowable operating regions and permit a large number of operating cycles while also providing a wide margin to nonductile failure. | | These limits define allowable operating regions and permit a large number of operating cycles while also providing a wide margin to nonductile failure. |
| (continued) | | (continued) the PTLR within the limits specified in the PTLR the PTLR within the limits specified in the PTLR within the limits specified in the PTLR within the limits specified in the PTLR |
| LaSalle 1 and 2 B 3.4.11-3 Revision 13
| |
|
| |
|
| RCS P/T Limits B 3.4.11 BASES SURVEILLANCE SR 3.4.11.1 (continued) specified in the REQUIREMENTS PTLR The limits of Figures 3.4.11-1, 3.4.11-2, 3.4.11-3, 3.4.11-4, 3.4.11-5, and 3.4.11-6 are met when operation is to the right of the applicable curve. | | RCS P/T Limits B 3.4.11 LaSalle 1 and 2 B 3.4.11-7 Revision 51 BASES SURVEILLANCE SR 3.4.11.1 (continued) |
| | REQUIREMENTS The limits of Figures 3.4.11-1, 3.4.11-2, 3.4.11-3, 3.4.11-4, 3.4.11-5, and 3.4.11-6 are met when operation is to the right of the applicable curve. |
| Surveillance for heatup, cooldown, or inservice leak and hydrostatic testing may be discontinued when the criteria given in the relevant plant procedure for ending the activity are satisfied. | | Surveillance for heatup, cooldown, or inservice leak and hydrostatic testing may be discontinued when the criteria given in the relevant plant procedure for ending the activity are satisfied. |
| This SR has been modified by a Note that requires this Surveillance to be performed only during system heatup and cooldown operations and inservice leak and hydrostatic testing. | | This SR has been modified by a Note that requires this Surveillance to be performed only during system heatup and cooldown operations and inservice leak and hydrostatic testing. |
| specified in the SR 3.4.11.2 PTLR A separate limit is used when the reactor is approaching criticality. Consequently, the RCS pressure and temperature must be verified within the appropriate limits before withdrawing control rods that will make the reactor critical. The limits of Figures 3.4.11-3 and 3.4.11-6 are met when operation is to the right of the applicable curve.
| | SR 3.4.11.2 A separate limit is used when the reactor is approaching criticality. Consequently, the RCS pressure and temperature must be verified within the appropriate limits before withdrawing control rods that will make the reactor critical. The limits of Figures 3.4.11-3 and 3.4.11-6 are met when operation is to the right of the applicable curve. |
| Performing the Surveillance within 15 minutes before control rod withdrawal for the purpose of achieving criticality provides adequate assurance that the limits will not be exceeded between the time of the Surveillance and the time of the control rod withdrawal. | | Performing the Surveillance within 15 minutes before control rod withdrawal for the purpose of achieving criticality provides adequate assurance that the limits will not be exceeded between the time of the Surveillance and the time of the control rod withdrawal. |
| SR 3.4.11.3 and SR 3.4.11.4 Differential temperatures within the applicable limits ensure that thermal stresses resulting from the startup of an idle recirculation pump will not exceed design allowances. In addition, compliance with these limits ensures that the assumptions of the analysis for the startup of an idle recirculation loop (Ref. 8) are satisfied. | | SR 3.4.11.3 and SR 3.4.11.4 Differential temperatures within the applicable limits ensure that thermal stresses resulting from the startup of an idle recirculation pump will not exceed design allowances. In addition, compliance with these limits ensures that the assumptions of the analysis for the startup of an idle recirculation loop (Ref. 8) are satisfied. |
| (continued) | | (continued) specified in the PTLR specified in the PTLR}} |
| LaSalle 1 and 2 B 3.4.11-7 Revision 51}}
| |
|
---|
Category:Technical Specification
MONTHYEARML24103A2042024-04-12012 April 2024 Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-591-A, Revise Risk Informed Completion Time (RICT) Program Revision 0 and Revise 10 CFR 50.69 License Condition RS-23-042, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-580, Provide Exception from Entering Mode 4 with No Operable RHR Shutdown Cooling2023-05-25025 May 2023 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-580, Provide Exception from Entering Mode 4 with No Operable RHR Shutdown Cooling ML22332A4512022-11-10010 November 2022 Attachment 3 - Markup of Technical Specification Bases Pages (for Information Only) RS-22-092, Nine and Quad Cities - Application to Revise Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation Technical Specifications in Accordance with TSTF-306, Revision 2, Add Action to LCO 3.3.6.1 to Give Option to Isolate the Penetration2022-10-0303 October 2022 Nine and Quad Cities - Application to Revise Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation Technical Specifications in Accordance with TSTF-306, Revision 2, Add Action to LCO 3.3.6.1 to Give Option to Isolate the Penetration ML22111A2572022-04-13013 April 2022 Technical Specification Bases RS-20-115, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-582, Reactor Pressure Vessel Water Inventory Control (RPV WIC) Enhancements2020-11-18018 November 2020 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-582, Reactor Pressure Vessel Water Inventory Control (RPV WIC) Enhancements RS-20-087, Request for a License Amendment to LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2, Technical Specification 3.7.3, Ultimate Heat Sink2020-07-17017 July 2020 Request for a License Amendment to LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2, Technical Specification 3.7.3, Ultimate Heat Sink JAFP-20-0049, Application to Adopt TSTF-427, Revision 2, Allowance for Non Technical Specification Barrier Degradation on Supported System Operability2020-06-22022 June 2020 Application to Adopt TSTF-427, Revision 2, Allowance for Non Technical Specification Barrier Degradation on Supported System Operability RS-20-029, Technical Specification Bases2020-04-13013 April 2020 Technical Specification Bases RS-20-009, Application to Revise LaSalle County Station Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times - RITSTF Initiative 4b2020-01-31031 January 2020 Application to Revise LaSalle County Station Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times - RITSTF Initiative 4b JAFP-19-0067, Application to Adopt TSTF-427, Revision 2, Allowance for Non Technical Specification Barrier Degradation on Supported System Operability2019-06-27027 June 2019 Application to Adopt TSTF-427, Revision 2, Allowance for Non Technical Specification Barrier Degradation on Supported System Operability RS-19-039, Fleet License Amendment Request - Common Language for Technical Specification High Radiation Area Administrative Controls2019-06-26026 June 2019 Fleet License Amendment Request - Common Language for Technical Specification High Radiation Area Administrative Controls RS-18-028, License Amendment Request to Remove Operating Mode Restrictions for Performing Surveillance Testing of the Division 3 Battery and High Pressure Core Spray Diesel Generator2018-04-19019 April 2018 License Amendment Request to Remove Operating Mode Restrictions for Performing Surveillance Testing of the Division 3 Battery and High Pressure Core Spray Diesel Generator RS-18-044, Revised Technical Specification Bases2018-04-11011 April 2018 Revised Technical Specification Bases RS-18-009, License Amendment Request for Temporary Extensions to Technical Specifications Supporting Maintenance on Portions of the Core Standby Cooling System2018-01-24024 January 2018 License Amendment Request for Temporary Extensions to Technical Specifications Supporting Maintenance on Portions of the Core Standby Cooling System RS-16-191, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications 5.5.13, Primary Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program, for Permanent Extension of Type a and Type C Leak Rate Test Frequencies2016-10-26026 October 2016 License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications 5.5.13, Primary Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program, for Permanent Extension of Type a and Type C Leak Rate Test Frequencies ML16209A2182016-07-26026 July 2016 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-545, Revision 3, TS Lnservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing. RS-16-080, Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (Ufsar), Revision 22, Technical Specification Bases2016-04-11011 April 2016 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (Ufsar), Revision 22, Technical Specification Bases RS-15-002, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications Sections 3.5.1, ECCS - Operating2015-01-12012 January 2015 License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications Sections 3.5.1, ECCS - Operating RS-14-322, License Amendment Request for Addition of New LCO 3.10.8 for Reactor Vessel Hydrostatic and Leak Testing Requirements and for Adoption of TSTF-484, Revision 0, Use Of.2014-12-22022 December 2014 License Amendment Request for Addition of New LCO 3.10.8 for Reactor Vessel Hydrostatic and Leak Testing Requirements and for Adoption of TSTF-484, Revision 0, Use Of. RS-14-192, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-523, Generic Letter 2008-01, Managing Gas Accumulation, Revision 2, Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process2014-07-14014 July 2014 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-523, Generic Letter 2008-01, Managing Gas Accumulation, Revision 2, Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process RS-12-184, Request to Revise Technical Specification 2.1.1.2 for Minimum Critical Power Ratio Safety Limit - Cycle 152012-10-11011 October 2012 Request to Revise Technical Specification 2.1.1.2 for Minimum Critical Power Ratio Safety Limit - Cycle 15 RS-11-036, License Amendment Request for Adoption of Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-514, Revision 3, Revise BWR Operability Requirements and Actions for RCS Leakage Instrumentation.2011-04-0404 April 2011 License Amendment Request for Adoption of Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-514, Revision 3, Revise BWR Operability Requirements and Actions for RCS Leakage Instrumentation. RS-10-015, Request for Amendment to Technical Specification 3.1.7, Standby Liquid Control (SLC) System.2010-02-22022 February 2010 Request for Amendment to Technical Specification 3.1.7, Standby Liquid Control (SLC) System. RS-10-001, LaSalle, Units 1 and 2, Attachment 3 - Markup of Proposed Technical Specifications Bases and Technical Requirements Manual Pages2010-01-27027 January 2010 LaSalle, Units 1 and 2, Attachment 3 - Markup of Proposed Technical Specifications Bases and Technical Requirements Manual Pages ML1003213072010-01-27027 January 2010 Attachment 3 - Markup of Proposed Technical Specifications Bases and Technical Requirements Manual Pages RS-08-132, Transmittal Letter of Additional Information Regarding Request for License Amendment Regarding Application of Alternative Source Term. Attachments 1 - 52008-10-23023 October 2008 Transmittal Letter of Additional Information Regarding Request for License Amendment Regarding Application of Alternative Source Term. Attachments 1 - 5 RS-08-132, LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 - Transmittal Letter of Additional Information Regarding Request for License Amendment Regarding Application of Alternative Source Term. Attachments 1 - 52008-10-23023 October 2008 LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 - Transmittal Letter of Additional Information Regarding Request for License Amendment Regarding Application of Alternative Source Term. Attachments 1 - 5 ML0823907072008-08-21021 August 2008 Revised T.S. Pages Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station and Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Unit 3-Correction to Facility Operating Licenses RA-08-047, Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Revision of Control Rod Notch Surveillance Test Frequency, Clarification of SRM Insert Control Rod Action and Clarification of a Frequency Example Using the Consolidation Line Item I2008-06-0909 June 2008 Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Revision of Control Rod Notch Surveillance Test Frequency, Clarification of SRM Insert Control Rod Action and Clarification of a Frequency Example Using the Consolidation Line Item Im RS-08-045, Technical Specification Bases2008-04-14014 April 2008 Technical Specification Bases RS-07-165, License Amendment Request Regarding Spent Fuel Storage Pool Criticality2007-12-13013 December 2007 License Amendment Request Regarding Spent Fuel Storage Pool Criticality RS-07-069, Request for a License Amendment to Technical Specification 3.7.3, Ultimate Heat Sink2007-06-29029 June 2007 Request for a License Amendment to Technical Specification 3.7.3, Ultimate Heat Sink RS-07-020, Exelon/Amergen Application to Revise Technical Specifications Regarding Control Room Envelope Habitability in Accordance with TSTF-448, Revision 3, Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process2007-04-12012 April 2007 Exelon/Amergen Application to Revise Technical Specifications Regarding Control Room Envelope Habitability in Accordance with TSTF-448, Revision 3, Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process RS-07-034, Additional Information Supporting the License Amendment Request Associated with Revised Allowable Values for Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Temperature Based Leak Detection2007-04-0606 April 2007 Additional Information Supporting the License Amendment Request Associated with Revised Allowable Values for Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Temperature Based Leak Detection RS-06-181, Byron, Dresden, LaSalle, Peach Bottom, and Quad Cities Nuclear Plants, Request for Technical Specification Change to Provide Consistency with EGC Quality Assurance Topical Report2006-12-15015 December 2006 Byron, Dresden, LaSalle, Peach Bottom, and Quad Cities Nuclear Plants, Request for Technical Specification Change to Provide Consistency with EGC Quality Assurance Topical Report RS-06-154, Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications Section 5.5.7, Inservice Testing Program.2006-11-17017 November 2006 Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications Section 5.5.7, Inservice Testing Program. RS-06-089, Additional Information Supporting the License Amendment Request Associated with Direct Current Electrical Power2006-08-16016 August 2006 Additional Information Supporting the License Amendment Request Associated with Direct Current Electrical Power ML0504902692005-02-0404 February 2005 Request for Change to Technical Specifications Traversing In-core Probe (TIP) System ML0434900702004-12-10010 December 2004 Tech Spec Pages for License Amendments 170 & 156, Pressure-Temperature Limits RS-04-125, Exelon/Amergen Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications Administrative Controls to Incorporate Requirement for Control Room Envelope Integrity Program2004-11-29029 November 2004 Exelon/Amergen Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications Administrative Controls to Incorporate Requirement for Control Room Envelope Integrity Program RS-04-067, Amergen, Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications Regarding Mode Change Limitations Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process2004-04-30030 April 2004 Amergen, Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications Regarding Mode Change Limitations Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process RS-03-079, Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications, Surveillance Requirement 3.7.7.1 for Turbine Bypass Valve Testing2003-05-19019 May 2003 Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications, Surveillance Requirement 3.7.7.1 for Turbine Bypass Valve Testing RS-03-031, Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications Surveillance Requirement 3.6.1.3.82003-04-18018 April 2003 Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications Surveillance Requirement 3.6.1.3.8 RS-03-040, Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications Section 5.7, High Radiation Area.2003-03-31031 March 2003 Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications Section 5.7, High Radiation Area. RS-03-029, Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications Table 3.3.5.1-1, Emergency Core Cooling System Instrumentation.2003-03-31031 March 2003 Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications Table 3.3.5.1-1, Emergency Core Cooling System Instrumentation. ML0234505702002-11-27027 November 2002 Request for Technical Specifications Change to Eliminate Requirements for Post Accident Sampling System Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process RS-02-164, Request for Amendment to Technical Specification 5.5.13, Primary Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program.2002-10-24024 October 2002 Request for Amendment to Technical Specification 5.5.13, Primary Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program. RS-02-110, Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications Table 3.3.8.1-1, Loss of Power Instrumentation.2002-07-0808 July 2002 Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications Table 3.3.8.1-1, Loss of Power Instrumentation. RS-02-076, Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications, Excess Flow Check Valve Testing Surveillance Requirement 3.6.1.3.8 & Relief Request RV-122002-05-31031 May 2002 Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications, Excess Flow Check Valve Testing Surveillance Requirement 3.6.1.3.8 & Relief Request RV-12 2024-04-12
[Table view] Category:Bases Change
MONTHYEARML22332A4512022-11-10010 November 2022 Attachment 3 - Markup of Technical Specification Bases Pages (for Information Only) RS-22-092, Nine and Quad Cities - Application to Revise Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation Technical Specifications in Accordance with TSTF-306, Revision 2, Add Action to LCO 3.3.6.1 to Give Option to Isolate the Penetration2022-10-0303 October 2022 Nine and Quad Cities - Application to Revise Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation Technical Specifications in Accordance with TSTF-306, Revision 2, Add Action to LCO 3.3.6.1 to Give Option to Isolate the Penetration ML22111A2572022-04-13013 April 2022 Technical Specification Bases RS-20-115, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-582, Reactor Pressure Vessel Water Inventory Control (RPV WIC) Enhancements2020-11-18018 November 2020 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-582, Reactor Pressure Vessel Water Inventory Control (RPV WIC) Enhancements RS-20-029, Technical Specification Bases2020-04-13013 April 2020 Technical Specification Bases RS-20-009, Application to Revise LaSalle County Station Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times - RITSTF Initiative 4b2020-01-31031 January 2020 Application to Revise LaSalle County Station Technical Specifications to Adopt Risk Informed Completion Times TSTF-505, Revision 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times - RITSTF Initiative 4b JAFP-19-0067, Application to Adopt TSTF-427, Revision 2, Allowance for Non Technical Specification Barrier Degradation on Supported System Operability2019-06-27027 June 2019 Application to Adopt TSTF-427, Revision 2, Allowance for Non Technical Specification Barrier Degradation on Supported System Operability RS-18-028, License Amendment Request to Remove Operating Mode Restrictions for Performing Surveillance Testing of the Division 3 Battery and High Pressure Core Spray Diesel Generator2018-04-19019 April 2018 License Amendment Request to Remove Operating Mode Restrictions for Performing Surveillance Testing of the Division 3 Battery and High Pressure Core Spray Diesel Generator RS-18-044, Revised Technical Specification Bases2018-04-11011 April 2018 Revised Technical Specification Bases RS-18-009, License Amendment Request for Temporary Extensions to Technical Specifications Supporting Maintenance on Portions of the Core Standby Cooling System2018-01-24024 January 2018 License Amendment Request for Temporary Extensions to Technical Specifications Supporting Maintenance on Portions of the Core Standby Cooling System ML16209A2182016-07-26026 July 2016 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-545, Revision 3, TS Lnservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing. RS-16-080, Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (Ufsar), Revision 22, Technical Specification Bases2016-04-11011 April 2016 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (Ufsar), Revision 22, Technical Specification Bases RS-15-002, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications Sections 3.5.1, ECCS - Operating2015-01-12012 January 2015 License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specifications Sections 3.5.1, ECCS - Operating RS-14-322, License Amendment Request for Addition of New LCO 3.10.8 for Reactor Vessel Hydrostatic and Leak Testing Requirements and for Adoption of TSTF-484, Revision 0, Use Of.2014-12-22022 December 2014 License Amendment Request for Addition of New LCO 3.10.8 for Reactor Vessel Hydrostatic and Leak Testing Requirements and for Adoption of TSTF-484, Revision 0, Use Of. RS-14-192, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-523, Generic Letter 2008-01, Managing Gas Accumulation, Revision 2, Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process2014-07-14014 July 2014 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-523, Generic Letter 2008-01, Managing Gas Accumulation, Revision 2, Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process RS-11-036, License Amendment Request for Adoption of Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-514, Revision 3, Revise BWR Operability Requirements and Actions for RCS Leakage Instrumentation.2011-04-0404 April 2011 License Amendment Request for Adoption of Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-514, Revision 3, Revise BWR Operability Requirements and Actions for RCS Leakage Instrumentation. RS-10-015, Request for Amendment to Technical Specification 3.1.7, Standby Liquid Control (SLC) System.2010-02-22022 February 2010 Request for Amendment to Technical Specification 3.1.7, Standby Liquid Control (SLC) System. ML1003213072010-01-27027 January 2010 Attachment 3 - Markup of Proposed Technical Specifications Bases and Technical Requirements Manual Pages RS-10-001, LaSalle, Units 1 and 2, Attachment 3 - Markup of Proposed Technical Specifications Bases and Technical Requirements Manual Pages2010-01-27027 January 2010 LaSalle, Units 1 and 2, Attachment 3 - Markup of Proposed Technical Specifications Bases and Technical Requirements Manual Pages RS-08-045, Technical Specification Bases2008-04-14014 April 2008 Technical Specification Bases RS-07-069, Request for a License Amendment to Technical Specification 3.7.3, Ultimate Heat Sink2007-06-29029 June 2007 Request for a License Amendment to Technical Specification 3.7.3, Ultimate Heat Sink RS-07-020, Exelon/Amergen Application to Revise Technical Specifications Regarding Control Room Envelope Habitability in Accordance with TSTF-448, Revision 3, Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process2007-04-12012 April 2007 Exelon/Amergen Application to Revise Technical Specifications Regarding Control Room Envelope Habitability in Accordance with TSTF-448, Revision 3, Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process ML0504902692005-02-0404 February 2005 Request for Change to Technical Specifications Traversing In-core Probe (TIP) System RS-03-031, Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications Surveillance Requirement 3.6.1.3.82003-04-18018 April 2003 Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications Surveillance Requirement 3.6.1.3.8 2022-04-13
[Table view] |
Text
ATTACHMENT 3 Markup of Technical Specification Bases Pages (for information only)
RCS P/T Limits B 3.4.11 LaSalle 1 and 2 B 3.4.11-1 Revision 50 B 3.4 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM (RCS)
B 3.4.11 RCS Pressure and Temperature (P/T) Limits BASES BACKGROUND All components of the RCS are designed to withstand effects of cyclic loads due to system pressure and temperature changes. These loads are introduced by startup (heatup) and shutdown (cooldown) operations, power transients, and reactor trips. This LCO limits the pressure and temperature changes during RCS heatup and cooldown, within the design assumptions and the stress limits for cyclic operation.
The Specification contains P/T limit curves for heatup, cooldown, inservice leak and hydrostatic testing, and criticality and also limits the maximum rate of change of reactor coolant temperature. The P/T limit curves are applicable for 32 effective full power years.
Each P/T limit curve defines an acceptable region for normal operation. The usual use of the curves is operational guidance during heatup or cooldown maneuvering, when pressure and temperature indications are monitored and compared to the applicable curve to determine that operation is within the allowable region.
The LCO establishes operating limits that provide a margin to brittle failure of the reactor vessel and piping of the reactor coolant pressure boundary (RCPB). The vessel is the component most subject to brittle failure. Therefore, the LCO limits apply mainly to the vessel.
10 CFR 50, Appendix G (Ref. 1), requires the establishment of P/T limits for material fracture toughness requirements of the RCPB materials. Reference 1 requires an adequate margin to brittle failure during normal operation, anticipated operational occurrences, and system hydrostatic tests. It mandates the use of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code,Section III, Appendix G (Ref. 2).
The actual shift in the RTNDT of the vessel material will be established periodically by removing and evaluating the irradiated reactor vessel material specimens, in accordance with ASTM E 185 (Ref. 3) and 10 CFR 50, Appendix H (continued) 54
RCS P/T Limits B 3.4.11 LaSalle 1 and 2 B 3.4.11-3 Revision 13 BASES APPLICABLE P/T limits are not derived from any DBA, there are no SAFETY ANALYSES acceptance limits related to the P/T limits. Rather, the (continued)
P/T limits are acceptance limits themselves since they preclude operation in an unanalyzed condition.
RCS P/T limits satisfy Criterion 2 of 10 CFR 50.36(c)(2)(ii).
LCO The elements of this LCO are:
a.
RCS pressure and temperature are within the limits specified in Figures 3.4.11-1, 3.4.11-2, 3.4.11-3, 3.4.11-4, 3.4.11-5, and 3.4.11-6, heatup and cooldown rates are 100F in any 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> period during RCS heatup, cooldown, and inservice leak and hydrostatic testing, and the RCS temperature change during system leakage and hydrostatic testing is 20F in any 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> period when the RCS temperature and pressure are not within the limits of Figure 3.4.11-2 and 3.4.11-5 as applicable; b.
The temperature difference between the reactor vessel bottom head coolant and the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) coolant is 145F during recirculation pump startup in MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4; c.
The temperature difference between the reactor coolant in the respective recirculation loop and in the reactor vessel is 50F during recirculation pump startup in MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4; d.
RCS pressure and temperature are within the applicable criticality limits specified in Figures 3.4.11-3 and 3.4.11-6, prior to achieving criticality; and e.
The reactor vessel flange and the head flange temperatures are 72F for Unit 1 and 86F for Unit 2 when tensioning the reactor vessel head bolting studs and when the reactor head is tensioned.
These limits define allowable operating regions and permit a large number of operating cycles while also providing a wide margin to nonductile failure.
(continued) the PTLR within the limits specified in the PTLR the PTLR within the limits specified in the PTLR within the limits specified in the PTLR within the limits specified in the PTLR
RCS P/T Limits B 3.4.11 LaSalle 1 and 2 B 3.4.11-7 Revision 51 BASES SURVEILLANCE SR 3.4.11.1 (continued)
REQUIREMENTS The limits of Figures 3.4.11-1, 3.4.11-2, 3.4.11-3, 3.4.11-4, 3.4.11-5, and 3.4.11-6 are met when operation is to the right of the applicable curve.
Surveillance for heatup, cooldown, or inservice leak and hydrostatic testing may be discontinued when the criteria given in the relevant plant procedure for ending the activity are satisfied.
This SR has been modified by a Note that requires this Surveillance to be performed only during system heatup and cooldown operations and inservice leak and hydrostatic testing.
SR 3.4.11.2 A separate limit is used when the reactor is approaching criticality. Consequently, the RCS pressure and temperature must be verified within the appropriate limits before withdrawing control rods that will make the reactor critical. The limits of Figures 3.4.11-3 and 3.4.11-6 are met when operation is to the right of the applicable curve.
Performing the Surveillance within 15 minutes before control rod withdrawal for the purpose of achieving criticality provides adequate assurance that the limits will not be exceeded between the time of the Surveillance and the time of the control rod withdrawal.
SR 3.4.11.3 and SR 3.4.11.4 Differential temperatures within the applicable limits ensure that thermal stresses resulting from the startup of an idle recirculation pump will not exceed design allowances. In addition, compliance with these limits ensures that the assumptions of the analysis for the startup of an idle recirculation loop (Ref. 8) are satisfied.
(continued) specified in the PTLR specified in the PTLR