ML20211M255

Concurs on Content of 10CFR50.72 Re Immediate Notification Requirement But Requests Change to Commission Paper. Distinction Between Safety & Security Events Should Be Clarified

ML20211M255
Person / Time
Issue date:	05/21/1983
From:	Jennifer Davis NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To:	Deyoung R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
Shared Package
ML20209B956	List: ML20209B952 ML20209B960 ML20209B964 ML20209B968 ML20209B974 ML20209C196 ML20209G103 ML20211M231 ML20211M244 ML20211M255 ML20211M278 ML20211M299 ML20211M325 ML20211M339 ML20211M350 ML21314A280 ML21314A281
References
FOIA-86-729 NUDOCS 8612170089
Download: ML20211M255 (1)

Text

g g/( b / C [ b) '

umna stans b :r &. & i l

3 ,

Nuc I4 AEGUL. TOR'r cOFi

'Q' / ,

4 ,.g,j .

uta. orcs a c cs a '

2h ./

• p>

• l

...y g.pg

% \

"f.1

1. ' ICQpm gd,

- /

MEMORANDUM FOR: Richard C. DeYoung, Director p'?

Office of Inspection and Enforcement '

FROM: John G. Davis, Director I Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards

SUBJECT:

IMMEDIATE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR OPERATING NUCLEAR POWER REACTORS (10 CFR 50.72)

We have reviewed the draft Commission Paper forwarding the final rule 10 CFR 50.72 concerning immediate notification requirements. We concur on the rule's content, but request a change to the Comission Paper. The paper should clearly indicate that the proposed rule applies to reports of safety-related events while other requirements (73.71(B)(C)) address reports of security-related events. This distinction between safety and security should be made as clear as possible so that confusion may be avoided.

// John G. Davis, Director Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards TS1HV121  ?;0TE: Comment resolved by telecon between IE (Jordan) and I; MSS (Burnett)6/2/83 8612170009 061212 hKA - 29

'c,

/* *%

UNITED STA TEs g (

k, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i

3,%Jk[fl

\

WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 9.

May 31,1983 l' [

MEMORANDUM FOR: Richard C. DeYoung, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement FROM: Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation SUB JECT: CONCURRENCE IN THE FINAL RULE ATTENDING THE IMMEDIATE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT (10 CFR 50.72)

In response to your request of May 5,1983, we have reviewed the Commission Paper on the above subject. The final version of the immediate notification requirement for operating nuclear power reactors (10 CFR 50.72) incorporates many of our earlier comments and is acceptable. Therefore, NRR concurs with the proposed Commission Paper on this subject. Our recent comments on the LER system (Licensee Event Report Rulemaking (10 CFR 50.73),

H. R. Denton to C. J. Heltemes, May 20, 1983) which suggest a delay in the implementation of the LER system do not affect our support for the modifications to the immediate notification requirement (10 CFR 50.72) or its implementation.

f s~

Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Po34-%-729 Yl1 n

/g

. _- . - _ .