IR 05000369/1984024

Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-369/84-24 & 50-370/84-21.Violations & Deviations Remain as Stated on Encl

ML20135F170
Person / Time
Site:	McGuire, Mcguire
Issue date:	08/27/1985
From:	Grace J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:	Tucker H DUKE POWER CO.
References
RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737, TASK-1.C.2, TASK-TM NUDOCS 8509170180
Download: ML20135F170 (4)

Text

--

, _ _ -,7

- *

. ..

.

'

-x August 27, 1985 N

. Duke Power Company

/ ATTN: -Mr. H. B. Tucker, Vice President Nuclear Production Department 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28242 Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: ' REPORT NOS. 50-369/84-24 AND 50-370/84-21

.Thank you for your supplemental response of June 7,_1985, to our Notice' o Violation and Notice of Deviation issued on November 1, 1984, concerning 's activities conducted at your McGuire facilit Please find enclosed our ,

evaluation of your supplemental respons For the reasons stated in the enclosure, the violations and deviation remain as n '

stated. Additionally, our evaluation indicates that.your response meets the requirements of 10 CFR 2.20 We will . examine the implementation of your corrective action during future inspection We appreciate your cooperation in this matte

Sincerely, (Original signed by JNGrace) ,

J. Nelson Grace Regional Administrator

Enclosure:

Staff Assessment of Duke Power Company '

Supplemental Response

<

~

gc w/ enc 1:

t/T. L. McConnell, Station Manager '. . >,

~

>

'-

c w/ enc 1: ;y ' _

RC Resident Inspector -

Document Control Desk 1 p

' State of North Carolina ALv/M -

RII RII RII RII RII h RII

- d B0ebs' 'CJulian 'YAGibson VBr nlee '

Y HChristensen:1 s 8/' /85- .8/1/85 8/ ./85 8/ /85 8/4 /85 (8/g 5 1

' '

RII RI k RW alker JA hinski 8/ /85 '8 85 DR NS $ 9 , .

, ,es- av R o-

--

.q .

- .. .

>

Duke Power Company ATTN: Mr. H. B. Tucker, Vice President

_

Nuclear Production Department 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28242 Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: REPORT NOS. 50-369/84-24 and 50-370/84-21 Thank you for your supplemental response of June 7,1985, to our Notice of Violation and Notice of Deviation issued on November 1, 1984, concerning activities conducted at your McGuire facilit Please find enclosed our evaluation of your supplemental respons For the reasons stated in the enclosure, the violations and deviation remain as stated. Additionally, our evaluation indicates that your response meets the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201. We will examine the implementation of your corrective action during future inspection We appreciate your cooperation in this matte

Sincerely, J. Nelson Grace Regional Administrator Enclosure:

Staff Assessment of Duke Power Company Supplemental Response cc w/ enc 1:

T. L. McConnell, Station Manager M. D. McIntosh, Plant Manager bec w/ encl:

NRC Resident Inspector Document Control Desk State of North Carolina RII RII RII ,

RI RII RII HChhistensen:lb BDeb CJ n AGibsM VBrownlee GJenkins 8/guf85 8/gN85 8/ /85 8/ /85 8/y/85 8/)$/85 RI RII R alker JA01shinski 8/ 2 /85 8/ /85

r

. .

.

ENCLOSURE STAFF ASSESSMENT OF DUKE POWER COMPANY'S SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND NOTICE OF DEVIATION RELATED TO MCGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-369/84-24 AND 50-370/84-21 Region II has reviewed the licensee's supplemental response and concluded that there is sufficient justification for consideration of these items as a violation. Specifically: With respect to example 1.a. the licensee has not specifically provided any additional information on the non-licensed employee who was observed entering the " Surveillance Area" without receiving prior authorization from the on-duty licensed Reactor Operator or Senior Reactor Operator; therefore, this example of the violation remains as writte With respect to example 1.b, the staff finds your stated action acceptable, With respect to examples 1.c,1.d. and 1.e, the staff finds your stated action acceptabl With respect to example 1.f. the staff finds your stated action acceptable, With respect to example 1.g. the staff finds your stated action acceptabl . With respect to violation No. 2, the staff finds your response of submitting a proposed license amendment to clarify Technical Specification 6. acceptabl The violation remains as written since the letter was not addressed to all station personnel as required by the current Technical Specificatio l With respect to your supplemental response regarding violation No. 3, your response is acceptable. Since you have admitted that the Nuclear Safety .'

Review Board (NSRB) review documentation was lost for four of the 18 cited procedures, the violation remains with the clarification that the violation relates to four unreviewed procedures vice 1 . Regarding the Notice of Deviation, Station Directive 3.1.9 was provided for NRC review to substantiate the implementation of NUREG-0737 Item I.C.2, Shift Relief and Turnover Procedures. The originel procedure required a master file of completed shift relief and turnover check-off sheets be maintained for a minimum of six years. NRC's review of the original submittal stated this fact in McGuire Nuclear Station Safety Evaluation Report (SER),SupplementNo.4.

L_______________________________ _ _ _ . . ,

Enclosure 2'

Your supplemental response to the deviation failed to note the six-year retention statement when quoting the SER as justification for meeting Item I.C.2. For the aforementioned reasons, the deviation remains as written,

>

0