ML19208D676: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:..STATE OF OKL A HOM A | {{#Wiki_filter:. . | ||
: g. STATE OF OKL A HOM A c- ..s gj ig OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR 212 STATE CAPITOL BulLDING | |||
?/ | |||
'""'" June 2,0, 1979 t6 / 3212343 Mr. Joseph M. Hendrie, Chairman U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washingtori, D. C. | [, OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA 73105 GEORGE NIGH | ||
20555 | '""'" June 2,0, 1979 t6 / 3212343 Mr. Joseph M. Hendrie, Chairman U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washingtori, D. C. 20555 | ||
==Dear Mr. Hendrie:== | ==Dear Mr. Hendrie:== | ||
I share your concern with regard to states having ade-quate radiological emergency response plans in opera-tion which support fixed nuclear facilities. | I share your concern with regard to states having ade-quate radiological emergency response plans in opera-tion which support fixed nuclear facilities. I appreciate your kind offer to assist in preparing such a plan through the mechanism of the P.deral Interagency Re-gional Advisory Coninittee and your agency. | ||
I appreciate your kind offer to assist in preparing such a plan through the mechanism of the P.deral Interagency Re-gional Advisory Coninittee and your agency. | - The Occupational and Radiological Health Service of the Oklahoma Department of Health, in cooperation with the Oklahoma Office of Civil Defense, has recently completed a preliminary draft of Oklahoma's radiologi-cal plan. Copies of this draft have been circulated to my office, several State executive agencies, the flRC Office of State Programs, and Public Service Company of Oklahoma for conments. Following revision in accord with these comments, the plan will be circulated for - | ||
The Occupational and Radiological Health Service of | comment to these State agencies, local officials, the public, and the flRC. Our current schedule calls for a final version of the plan to be ready by early 1980. We fully intend and expect to receive NRC concurrence to the final plan several years prior to the now anticipated operational status of the Black Fox Station in 1985. | ||
incerel yours , | |||
Following revision in accord with these comments, the plan will be circulated for | a f | ||
George ligh 790929 1055 354 | |||
incerel yours , a f George ligh 790929 1055 354 | |||
BFS 2.1.3.1 Population Within 10 Miles. A map of the 10-mile area of the BFS | |||
The map is overlayed with concentric circles, centered on the central plant complex with radii of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, | ( | ||
Site is presented on Figure 2.1-6. The map is overlayed with concentric circles, centered on the central plant complex with radii of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 miles, and with radial lines forming 22-1/2 degree sectors centered on the 16 cardinal compass points. Table 2.1-1 presents the corresponding pro-jected residential population within each annular and radial sector segments for the expected first y2ar of plant operation (1983) and by census decade beginning with 1990 through the end of the anticipated plant life (2020). | |||
The largest cu=uletive population density for this area through the year 2020, occurs within che 4-mile radius area, in which the town of Inola is located. | The largest cu=uletive population density for this area through the year 2020, occurs within che 4-mile radius area, in which the town of Inola is located. | ||
The 10-mile radius area is primarily rural and is expected to renain as such | The 10-mile radius area is primarily rural and is expected to renain as such , | ||
during the period of plant operation. Base data and methodology of population projections are presented in Subsection 6.1.4.2. | |||
(Supplement 6 2.1-3a 120376 C12 1055 555 | ( | ||
Supplement 6 2.1-3a 120376 C12 1055 555 | |||
BFS The town of Inola is the only significant population concentration with-( | |||
in the 10-mile area. The 1974 estimated population of Inola is 1176 with projections presented in the Community Development Plan, Inola Oklahoma, in-creasing to 4200 by the year 2000 (6). There are three other small communities within 10 miles of BFS in addition to the town of Inola. The other communities are New Tulsa (8 miles WSW), Fair Oaks (9 miles WNW), and Tiawah (10 miles N). | |||
New Tulsa and Fair Oaks are incorpor.ated entities in Wagoner County while Tiawah is unincorporated and located in Rogers County. New Tulsa and Fair Oaks populations are not expected to increase significantly according to projections by the Oklahoma Enployment Security Co==ission (7) . Much of the Tiawah current, estimated population of 95, is located beyond the 10-mile radius (8). | New Tulsa and Fair Oaks are incorpor.ated entities in Wagoner County while Tiawah is unincorporated and located in Rogers County. New Tulsa and Fair Oaks populations are not expected to increase significantly according to projections by the Oklahoma Enployment Security Co==ission (7) . Much of the Tiawah current, estimated population of 95, is located beyond the 10-mile radius (8). | ||
2.1.3.2 Population Between 10 and 50 Miles. | 2.1.3.2 Population Between 10 and 50 Miles. __ | ||
Figure 2.1-7 shows the region | Figure 2.1-7 shows the region within 50 miles of the reactor locations in northeast Oklahoma with concentric circles drawn at 10-mile radius intervals and with radial lines defining sectors centered on the 16 cardinal compass directions. The projected popu-lations for 1983,1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020 for each annular and radial sector segments are presented in Table 2.1-2. The methods for estimating population distribution are described in subsection 6.1.4.2. The nearest population center (as defined in 10 CFR 100) at the tire of startup of Unit 1 is Tulsa, Oklahoma with a 1970 censi s population of 330,350 (9). The nearest boundary of the densely populated area of Tulsa determined by inter-pretation of July 1974 aerici photographs is located 13 miles west of the Site. This distance is 5.2 times the low population zone radius of 2.5 miles. | ||
The methods for estimating population distribution are described in subsection 6.1.4.2. | |||
The nearest population center (as defined in 10 CFR 100) at the tire of startup of Unit 1 is Tulsa, Oklahoma with a 1970 censi s population of 330,350 (9). The nearest boundary of the densely populated area of Tulsa determined by inter-pretation of July 1974 aerici photographs is located 13 miles west of the Site. This distance is 5.2 times the low population zone radius of 2.5 miles. | |||
The segment within 50 miles of -BFS with the largest projected population is the segment containing Tuls,a, Oklahoma, which is the west sector, between 20 and 30-mile radii. The largest projected cumulative population density area is within 30 miles of BFS, in which the city of Tulsa is located. | The segment within 50 miles of -BFS with the largest projected population is the segment containing Tuls,a, Oklahoma, which is the west sector, between 20 and 30-mile radii. The largest projected cumulative population density area is within 30 miles of BFS, in which the city of Tulsa is located. | ||
Regional incorporated community statistics are presented in Table 2.1-3. | Regional incorporated community statistics are presented in Table 2.1-3. | ||
Data presented are the name of the community, county in which the community is located, distance and direction from the Site, and the 1970 census popu-lation. Location of the above communities in relation to the Site are shown on Figure 2.1-8. | Data presented are the name of the community, county in which the community is located, distance and direction from the Site, and the 1970 census popu-lation. Location of the above communities in relation to the Site are shown on Figure 2.1-8. | ||
2.1.3.3 Transient Population. The transient population within a 5-mile radius of BFS central complex include school and church attendees, commercial and industrial employees, recreational facility employees and users, and public | 2.1.3.3 Transient Population. The transient population within a 5-mile radius of BFS central complex include school and church attendees, commercial and industrial employees, recreational facility employees and users, and public 2.1-4 1055 556 CG | ||
.e O=woA QD | |||
e P | |||
(10-Mile | BFS O D h | ||
TA8LE 2.l-1 O g | |||
g - | |||
/-i ),A/lg f?N,-. | AREA REliDENT POPULAfl0N AND PROJECTIONS (Ref. Figure 2.1-6) .g , y Radial Olstence f rom Reactor (mile) 10 +ise 1,1 M i-],,0 Total Sector Iggg M 1-1 id N 1970 3 3 25 56 22 454 363 1983 0 4 36 80 31 362 513 1990 0 5 42 94 37 425 603 2000 0 7 56 126 49 570 808 2010 0 8 70 156 61 707' 1002 2020 0 to 84 189 74 857 1214 | ||
~ | |||
, | NME 1970 3 0 51 8 42 310 414 1983 0 0 297 417 ' 60 M3 1217 1990 0 0 305 Sol 70 519 1395 2000 0 0 401 572 94 696 1763 2010 0 0 426 609 117 863 2015 2020 0 0 MO 633 142 1046 2261 NE 1970 0 8 243 674 M 221 1 ?! | ||
. | 1983 0 135 908 974 160 310 2W 1990 0 140 932 999 191 352 2614 | ||
( | |||
f f | 2000 0 154 1223 131l 232 427 3377 2010 0 197 1296 1389 263 496 3%I 2020 0 208 1339 1435 193 569 38 % | ||
b?^M. | ENE 1970 0 5 8 33 47 210 303 1983 0 7 287 76 67 189 726 1990 0 8 298 90 79 31; 797 2000 0 Il 390 lie 105 363 983 2010 0 14 416 134 131 402 1097 2020 0 17 434 159 159 438 1207 E 1970 0 8 II 8 14 194 235 1983 0 11 16 11 20 266 324 1990 0 13 18 13 23 295 362 2000 0 18 25 18 31 327 419 2010 0 22 31 22 39 35) 571 2020 0 27 37 27 47 384 522 Est 1970 0 8 Il 14 0 12 7 160 1983 0 Il 16 to 0 334 381 1990 0 13 18 23 0 381 435 2000 0 18 25 31 0 40 514 g | ||
-\ M | 2010 0 22 31 39 0 499 591 2020 0 27 37 47 0 SSI 662 1055 357 2.1-21 e | ||
1j; = -E-~' | |||
. e O | |||
i | = woA QD | ||
.- | ( | ||
TABLE 2.1-1 (Continued) d -s | |||
}{ [ | |||
JL d iO+ii. | |||
$,ctor leer 0,, 1, 1,1 j-1 16 M i-10 Total 3 5 5 18 194 228 SE 1970 3 1963 0 4 7 7 29 312 359 0 5 8 8 34 369 424 1990 2000 0 7 11 11 4l M2 512 2010 0 8 14 14 48 514 598 2020 0 to 17 17 55 588 687 8 17 18 0 335 381 sst 1970 3 0 11 24 29 0 540 604 1983 1990 0 13 28 34 0 794 869 2000 0 18 38 41 0 952 1049 2010 0 22 47 48 0 1807 1224 2020 0 27 57 55 0 1268 1407 5 1970 3 14 3 3 0 M2 465 1983 0 20 4 5 0 712 74l 1990 0 23 5 6 0 840 874 2000 0 31 7 7 0 1007 1052 2010 0 39 8 8 0 1171 1226 2020 0 47 10 9 0 4340 1407 0 0 0 i f, 46 285 321 55W 1970 1983 0 0 0 16 42 459 517 1990 0 0 0 19 49 541 609 2000 0 0 0 23 59 649 731 2010 0 0 0 26 69 755 850 2010 0 0 0 30 79 864 973 SW 1970 0 0 0 3 to 495 5 08 1983 0 ? 0 5 16 797 818 1990 0 0 0 6 19 940 965 2000 0 0 0 7 23 1128 1858 2010 0 0 0 8 26 1311 1345 2020 0 0 0 9 30 1501 1540 Wsw 1970 8 0 0 5 8 596 617 1983 0 0 0 8 13 960 981 1990 0 0 0 9 15 1124 1148 2000 0 0 0 11 18 1349 1378 I 2010 0 0 0 13 11 1568 1602 2020 0 0 0 15 24 1795 1834 2.1-22 1055 358 r( | |||
FIGURE 2.1-6 1nC,F]> 0( O | |||
D v | |||
O]D w JU BFS n - -. ., | |||
.j%ket N | D @ T U - - Q TABLE 2.1-1 (Continued) | ||
( | |||
: | 10-Mile M 4-5, 5-10 Total Sector Year M M 23 8 0 0 810 821 W 1970 0 3 13 0 0 1,305 1,323 1983 0 5 0 0 1.539 1,560 1990 0 6 15 0 0 1,846 1,871 2000 0 7 18. | ||
8 22 0 0 2,145 2,175 2010 0 24 0 0 2,456 2,489 2020 0 9 0 3 23 35 WW 1970 3 3 3 . | |||
' | 0 5 5 0 5 37 52 1983 6 6 0 6 44 62 1990 0 0 7 7 0 7 52 73 2000 0 8 8 0 8 61 85 2010 2020 0 9 9 0 9 70 97 3 0 17 25 19 612 676 NW 1970 1983 0 0 24 36 27 874 %1 | ||
( | |||
1990 0 0 28 42 32 1,025 1.127 2000 0 0 38 56 43 1,374 1.511 2010 0 0 47 70 53 1,703 I,873 2020 0 0 57 84 64 2,064 2,269 0 0 39 61 44 291 435 NW 1970 0 56 87 63 416 622 1983 0 0 0 65 102 74 487 728 1990 0 0 88 !37 99 653 977 2000 0 109 170 122 810 1,211 2010 0 206 148 982 1,468 2020 0 0 132 GRAND 7,253 TOTALS 1970 29 63 441 923 297 5.500 1,693 1,771 533 8.416 12,626 1983 0 213 1,768 1,946 629 9,997 14,572 1990 0 232 2,327 2,W5 801 12,275 18,I76 2000 0 308 2.706 958 14,469 21,006 2010 0 348 2.525 | |||
4 4#b% | ( | ||
.e | 2,677 2.915 1.124 16,774 23,881 2020 0 391 | ||
It has been included in this listing because of its proximity to the plant site. | - 2.1-23 qr y ad .}g g | ||
.. m 9 o v o Ju 1"IId ~ | |||
~LOCAL C010fUNITY POPULATION PROJECTION & DENSITY | ( l 8 | ||
% l/ f }N i L lj | |||
(. | ( . yawG T ~ ^~ | ||
- | ~ | ||
t a-- - | |||
4),,9 - - i l , l-c | |||
: (3 | *l l | ||
', | $ t-- - | ||
A~rilAWAH | |||
, f - | |||
"f Iv' i i l' | |||
/- i ),A/lg f?N,- . | |||
I i ul | |||
~ '' | |||
] ~Q - | |||
,. H. 'MT';n3;cAs ~ A NE c ' c. i I f | |||
iI , | |||
[ , | |||
'c E;[a s 5 o. f .s l | |||
CATOOSA. . ./ > i | |||
~ | |||
7 | |||
~ ' | |||
'l / . e_5- 4) t C)C4TEAU +2 | |||
'c | |||
$^6!x ,1 A '_gTi | |||
._5 Mt. | |||
- i w. i! /i \ rip.- | |||
1i r | |||
N *(/i - | |||
'.~ l i i L. i .i-- | |||
3L.-:L_T..s / - . - - - , - . - _ , - | |||
f. | |||
5 b q | |||
~' / 'l " , L *;----- f f 3Wi.7 1 %1 7 ~: , ' i~ | |||
11 u b?^ - M. \ l , se 4 l""~ | |||
i sg- Tmi,. | |||
% a.o ,-'g -\ M '- | |||
^" {*' , | |||
y -- 4(]q L q _..-,7 . . , . . 7 -_.y_ ' | |||
1j I ' | |||
; = -E-~ | |||
. ~j g- \ ' | |||
N ! J , __ | |||
-. y \ r."g- ,/ , / ,.,", | |||
* f '/AZ:E | |||
~~ | |||
r- .e - g g | |||
-i . | |||
l. | |||
(\ | |||
x | |||
- A | |||
/ / _\-l /f - | |||
,, ._!'_\,I ! \x' x ( p 'z-f N ,' | |||
M E_ - i i | |||
-v i | |||
.i ;/ - | |||
g, ' -. --.- | |||
,e g . ,g - | |||
fj,h j s. | |||
l 7- . N - | |||
t , . | |||
( | |||
T< 'i ? . h,,,\ , g. - , | |||
f.- ;,- it | |||
-u- - | |||
' -- . _, I .._._ .- | |||
,/ _ | |||
J. ! i . j-\ , , , | |||
~~ -- | |||
- - ,ji ' U- S E~ | |||
_ j - | |||
.g, -]n .V, 's -- mq | |||
? | |||
m+- | |||
.,,- ,.:_; _ . _. .y ; , | |||
i.;.,. /..- | |||
s y Il l _g COWE TA O-' j ; ;73 g g ., , | |||
l . | |||
6 3"N[4=:., ~7, 2 ' L ;, l , M ' | |||
b ' , | |||
dj t I- | |||
-d. .. | |||
_, j il ! ._.- , , | |||
,) . -- | |||
0 I 2 o MILES SCALE: i i BFS 10-MILE RADIUS AREA MAP (REFERTOTABLE2.1-1) | |||
FIGURE 2.1-6 7 | |||
2.1-48 1nC,F] | |||
LJ > 0(V O e.tL | |||
J o' | |||
~/ /e j . | |||
r ..- | |||
\ | |||
4 q | |||
t C" g'- | |||
N s | |||
o s | |||
i e 4 | |||
~ | |||
g g, ? | |||
s | |||
^ e | |||
* g 3 ' | |||
,. 5 \. . | |||
h | |||
^ | |||
~ | |||
t~ . | |||
+ | |||
7 | |||
.-) | |||
g, e . | |||
&. l | |||
: s. : | |||
~ s* .: | |||
, s , , | |||
:t.meaJ | |||
, . qM * <.pO #("tmQ s& 4 sh *t g%s5 8 | |||
n | |||
_~d $e# ' | |||
i R 4 S A Q'%), $h 4@J,0, ;' f b wd s?Ak I . | |||
WmW sw4 b%.4$ | |||
~7 | |||
' a , | |||
h | |||
$ nim._4 5 ! % | |||
N .c S Q, jt m a ge$ yws gm,pD((%U1 $ | |||
a.$ %[Mn$4S%y/ | |||
; lh y yn&p.. h . ~.4T,Y 2M t%g;gh w I 3 J , | |||
/,4 M f'p;&i .. | |||
~ | |||
y | |||
+ - | |||
dd y | |||
g;,.w%p{@wM w | |||
4m7 h . | |||
fd f m. W %'% ~ | |||
%as~d ms y | |||
,%%.l4 c"W | |||
~ | |||
. ..~ . | |||
p 3*a/vmj p a | |||
^ | |||
:~ o yiwe f% ' | |||
%_S 9g ^ pw q [hy plp g ,g n 4$v~I | |||
' ,c 4 . f | |||
.... y,,6t m~*v : | |||
,M Ww $z W r, ~u g&ya v%g(L t | |||
k@$ | |||
7p, ~ | |||
[. -l | |||
: ; b;, .+'.: . b, , j%ket N | |||
a | |||
%L~ p e g g,. | |||
ay - g% . n | |||
%,Q f | |||
p,, WSp ~ | |||
mg gjg 9f | |||
%~ | |||
!* 4 gfy%hty,;ag i y;ds | |||
* , jg _ , | |||
?% , | |||
h,pw,g | |||
~ . | |||
@e_ | |||
w Qpg m | |||
~ ; | |||
gy, r An . '. | |||
Lu:g ,ng,,s}:;;;Qc l | |||
g | |||
: g. ts | |||
., ;g gmy,wf';}q. y x | |||
, n~. g | |||
'(* | |||
-- n.q | |||
~."n j ' | |||
l'?l . | |||
m4 Q mfptyf p m | |||
?sg'gyh'N'waygm | |||
# v g.g E | |||
5 w$ | |||
- ..',j. .;k p gg y | |||
.y p2 9sn5gg:,farg~.gm-fy , ' | |||
/g, aa*mj$'$gf | |||
. 'y itY | |||
.'.f A. =9,7 y | |||
2 , | |||
> ,4 }v - - | |||
e 3 x + | |||
f | |||
4 4 | |||
#+%%> | |||
se 4 | |||
. e. .. <e 1,. | |||
$<#&'+ | |||
T.ST TARG.T (MT-3) 1.0 M BA EM y ll EE u L"ILE UK l.25 1.4 1.6 | |||
+ 6- = | |||
#4 4$ 4% | |||
*'kff Yl? | |||
g,hk | |||
9 kk lYlQ M+W+ | |||
\ IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3) | |||
$*4 # | |||
NNNN 1.0 'dEA DM | |||
!' @ LE I.i l,'" ILE I.8 1.25 1.4 1.6 l | |||
~ | |||
>,,// ,,{ | |||
4 4 | |||
#b% | |||
#++ ,_. .. <e 1,. | |||
%'+4 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0 EDEBM y @ LE I.I [" EM 1.8 l | |||
l.25 jj i.4 g 4 6" > | |||
4% ++ | |||
*h>''W,/ | |||
, 4);e$'% | |||
. e BFS D* | |||
Qv TABLE 2.1-1 n - - | |||
d | |||
( REGIONAL INCORPORATED COMMUNITY STATISTICS o L- 3 Distance and 1970 Populatio_n h h Direction inola P.oge rs 3 miles NE 948 New Tulsa Wagoner 8 miles WSW 17 Fair Oaks Wagoner 9 miles WW 23 Tiewsh* Rogers 10 miles N 95** | |||
Catoosa Rogers 12 miles WW 970 Chouteau Mayes 13 miles ENE I 0% | |||
Coweta wagoner 13 miles $$W 2.457 Broken Arrow Tulse 14 miles WSW 11.787 , | |||
Claremore Rogers 14 miles NNW 9,084 Wagoner Wagoner 15 milec SE 4.959 Red Bird Wagoner 16 miles 5 230 Porter Wagone r 18 miles 5 624 Pryor Mayes 19 milss NE 7.057 Owasso Tulsa 20 miles WNW 3.498 Tul' ahassee Wagoner 21 miles $$E 183 Haskell Muskogee 22 miles !$W 2.06) | |||
Foyll Rogers 22 miles N 164 Simby Tulsa 23 miles SW 3.973 Locust Grove Mayes 23 miles ENE I.090 Okay Wagone r 23 miles SE 419 Tulsa Tulsa 23 miles u 330.350 Collinsville Tulsa 24 miles W 3.009 Jenks Tulse 25 miles W5W I.997 Taft Muskogee 25 mils 5 525 cologeh Rogers 25 miles NW 458 cherokee 26 miles E 82 Peggs Salina A.yes 26 miles ENE I.024 Hulbert C he rokee 26 mile s ESE 505 Adair Meyes 28 miles NE 459 | |||
*Tiawah is an unincorporated area within 10 miles of the plant site. | |||
It has been included in this listing because of its proximity to the plant site. | |||
**Tlemah population is estimated from abeelling counts on the County | |||
( Highway Map insert. | |||
2.1-9 1056 001 P | |||
O O BFS o a JU m - - | |||
D TABLE 2.1-3 | |||
~ | |||
LOCAL C010fUNITY POPULATION PROJECTION & DENSITY YEAR ESTIMATED POPULATION DENSITY Inola 948 237 (3 mi. NE) 1970 1974 1,176 345 1977 2,050 512 2,900 725 1980 3,080 770 1983 3,700 925 1990 4,200 1,050 2000 4,450 1,112 2010 4,600 1,150 2020 Tiawah 1970 95 127 (10 mi. N) 141 1974 106 1977 116 155 1980 125 167 1983 135 ISO 1990 159 212 2000 213 284 2010 264 352 | |||
( 2020 321 428 Residents per square mile. | |||
( . | |||
2.1-15 1056 002 | |||
? | |||
- 0* % | |||
BFS OvI O - - - | |||
-- 2 I//% ~ '- | |||
/ lx i 4 | |||
(. J '( N.[~ I* l | |||
- e_ .v_ | |||
x-Th % -11i 1 n | |||
9! WW ~' 'QN- ._.LN :!- sis'' | |||
, n3 ; W J ) | |||
s 1.d/.A%dus | |||
. .# y/ b/f g ,j ,f .,. to c i o. , | |||
4., . . - | |||
. ~ .', - | |||
-' ~ | |||
CATOOSA . | |||
3 W TEA'J ', | |||
- @i siiliLicum'nI.M-[, /Y G .. . | |||
! L i\ % '. | |||
.ffF r .;4 h- I _ ; h | |||
$ 'E i / l- _ | |||
7 i | |||
i( [ | |||
m, t | |||
%i W ;xTw_#{ u | |||
; ;\r | |||
.i 3j ; | |||
s) /IdwY m']l " '} | |||
!!!@ ,,-l f )\ \% '\ \i . | |||
t | |||
( | |||
,"i a: \r\ g(]Q. f )Q{ /i /.\/ | |||
: (3 t. i; t l' > | |||
/],2 cit | |||
! ! \by, t | |||
,I a | |||
j L e | |||
t a .,'* | |||
,f\]-,' N g .- f IEFT'ABUTWEK { | |||
'Q ACCQ3 R0Ap_ ' | |||
l/ ' ,. | |||
! \ #l Ts.h- ] \ '- j . f,(' i;- . | |||
Q_ ,_- _ | |||
g*' 'l \ ! ! - | |||
Ni_ y 'i K > | |||
y: , g f ; | |||
i K i i- | |||
.j' y/j!bg .._..o 2 | |||
.{ | |||
4 . . , | |||
u. | |||
7.j n . | |||
G.o,s r | |||
[_O[ I bh,[ . ' | |||
W.A i . NOTE: DOTTED LINE'IMDICATES - '' | |||
I i | |||
' / | |||
~/ i'''~~~ ~*."$ ~* | |||
- J TION.CE_ MEW STATE.j{lGHWA[ # ,~ ~ 7 | |||
, LOCATED IN THE AREA ,,, 's 4 - 4(. , ,e s. | |||
r . v-g,0FBFS. | |||
)! %. w' j, ', | |||
/ 7 y,.. gg g - | |||
\CO'A ETA } } , | |||
g- uy p \ . , - | |||
j vi s ukp y.s !, - | |||
I | |||
.x . - | |||
: 1- 2 - \t:!. -:-. - . ..- ..... | |||
. .s.- | |||
0 I 2 3 4 5 F.HERGENCY EVACUATION ROUTES SCALE IN MILES FIGURE 13.3-3 h | |||
\ | |||
7-on5n i3.'-'' | |||
1056 003}} |
Latest revision as of 18:25, 16 March 2020
ML19208D676 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Black Fox |
Issue date: | 06/20/1979 |
From: | Nigh G OKLAHOMA, STATE OF |
To: | Hendrie J NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
Shared Package | |
ML19208D673 | List: |
References | |
NUDOCS 7909290292 | |
Download: ML19208D676 (10) | |
Text
. .
- g. STATE OF OKL A HOM A c- ..s gj ig OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR 212 STATE CAPITOL BulLDING
?/
[, OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA 73105 GEORGE NIGH
'""'" June 2,0, 1979 t6 / 3212343 Mr. Joseph M. Hendrie, Chairman U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washingtori, D. C. 20555
Dear Mr. Hendrie:
I share your concern with regard to states having ade-quate radiological emergency response plans in opera-tion which support fixed nuclear facilities. I appreciate your kind offer to assist in preparing such a plan through the mechanism of the P.deral Interagency Re-gional Advisory Coninittee and your agency.
- The Occupational and Radiological Health Service of the Oklahoma Department of Health, in cooperation with the Oklahoma Office of Civil Defense, has recently completed a preliminary draft of Oklahoma's radiologi-cal plan. Copies of this draft have been circulated to my office, several State executive agencies, the flRC Office of State Programs, and Public Service Company of Oklahoma for conments. Following revision in accord with these comments, the plan will be circulated for -
comment to these State agencies, local officials, the public, and the flRC. Our current schedule calls for a final version of the plan to be ready by early 1980. We fully intend and expect to receive NRC concurrence to the final plan several years prior to the now anticipated operational status of the Black Fox Station in 1985.
incerel yours ,
a f
George ligh 790929 1055 354
BFS 2.1.3.1 Population Within 10 Miles. A map of the 10-mile area of the BFS
(
Site is presented on Figure 2.1-6. The map is overlayed with concentric circles, centered on the central plant complex with radii of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 miles, and with radial lines forming 22-1/2 degree sectors centered on the 16 cardinal compass points. Table 2.1-1 presents the corresponding pro-jected residential population within each annular and radial sector segments for the expected first y2ar of plant operation (1983) and by census decade beginning with 1990 through the end of the anticipated plant life (2020).
The largest cu=uletive population density for this area through the year 2020, occurs within che 4-mile radius area, in which the town of Inola is located.
The 10-mile radius area is primarily rural and is expected to renain as such ,
during the period of plant operation. Base data and methodology of population projections are presented in Subsection 6.1.4.2.
(
Supplement 6 2.1-3a 120376 C12 1055 555
BFS The town of Inola is the only significant population concentration with-(
in the 10-mile area. The 1974 estimated population of Inola is 1176 with projections presented in the Community Development Plan, Inola Oklahoma, in-creasing to 4200 by the year 2000 (6). There are three other small communities within 10 miles of BFS in addition to the town of Inola. The other communities are New Tulsa (8 miles WSW), Fair Oaks (9 miles WNW), and Tiawah (10 miles N).
New Tulsa and Fair Oaks are incorpor.ated entities in Wagoner County while Tiawah is unincorporated and located in Rogers County. New Tulsa and Fair Oaks populations are not expected to increase significantly according to projections by the Oklahoma Enployment Security Co==ission (7) . Much of the Tiawah current, estimated population of 95, is located beyond the 10-mile radius (8).
2.1.3.2 Population Between 10 and 50 Miles. __
Figure 2.1-7 shows the region within 50 miles of the reactor locations in northeast Oklahoma with concentric circles drawn at 10-mile radius intervals and with radial lines defining sectors centered on the 16 cardinal compass directions. The projected popu-lations for 1983,1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020 for each annular and radial sector segments are presented in Table 2.1-2. The methods for estimating population distribution are described in subsection 6.1.4.2. The nearest population center (as defined in 10 CFR 100) at the tire of startup of Unit 1 is Tulsa, Oklahoma with a 1970 censi s population of 330,350 (9). The nearest boundary of the densely populated area of Tulsa determined by inter-pretation of July 1974 aerici photographs is located 13 miles west of the Site. This distance is 5.2 times the low population zone radius of 2.5 miles.
The segment within 50 miles of -BFS with the largest projected population is the segment containing Tuls,a, Oklahoma, which is the west sector, between 20 and 30-mile radii. The largest projected cumulative population density area is within 30 miles of BFS, in which the city of Tulsa is located.
Regional incorporated community statistics are presented in Table 2.1-3.
Data presented are the name of the community, county in which the community is located, distance and direction from the Site, and the 1970 census popu-lation. Location of the above communities in relation to the Site are shown on Figure 2.1-8.
2.1.3.3 Transient Population. The transient population within a 5-mile radius of BFS central complex include school and church attendees, commercial and industrial employees, recreational facility employees and users, and public 2.1-4 1055 556 CG
e P
BFS O D h
TA8LE 2.l-1 O g
g -
AREA REliDENT POPULAfl0N AND PROJECTIONS (Ref. Figure 2.1-6) .g , y Radial Olstence f rom Reactor (mile) 10 +ise 1,1 M i-],,0 Total Sector Iggg M 1-1 id N 1970 3 3 25 56 22 454 363 1983 0 4 36 80 31 362 513 1990 0 5 42 94 37 425 603 2000 0 7 56 126 49 570 808 2010 0 8 70 156 61 707' 1002 2020 0 to 84 189 74 857 1214
~
NME 1970 3 0 51 8 42 310 414 1983 0 0 297 417 ' 60 M3 1217 1990 0 0 305 Sol 70 519 1395 2000 0 0 401 572 94 696 1763 2010 0 0 426 609 117 863 2015 2020 0 0 MO 633 142 1046 2261 NE 1970 0 8 243 674 M 221 1 ?!
1983 0 135 908 974 160 310 2W 1990 0 140 932 999 191 352 2614
(
2000 0 154 1223 131l 232 427 3377 2010 0 197 1296 1389 263 496 3%I 2020 0 208 1339 1435 193 569 38 %
ENE 1970 0 5 8 33 47 210 303 1983 0 7 287 76 67 189 726 1990 0 8 298 90 79 31; 797 2000 0 Il 390 lie 105 363 983 2010 0 14 416 134 131 402 1097 2020 0 17 434 159 159 438 1207 E 1970 0 8 II 8 14 194 235 1983 0 11 16 11 20 266 324 1990 0 13 18 13 23 295 362 2000 0 18 25 18 31 327 419 2010 0 22 31 22 39 35) 571 2020 0 27 37 27 47 384 522 Est 1970 0 8 Il 14 0 12 7 160 1983 0 Il 16 to 0 334 381 1990 0 13 18 23 0 381 435 2000 0 18 25 31 0 40 514 g
2010 0 22 31 39 0 499 591 2020 0 27 37 47 0 SSI 662 1055 357 2.1-21 e
. e O
= woA QD
(
TABLE 2.1-1 (Continued) d -s
}{ [
JL d iO+ii.
$,ctor leer 0,, 1, 1,1 j-1 16 M i-10 Total 3 5 5 18 194 228 SE 1970 3 1963 0 4 7 7 29 312 359 0 5 8 8 34 369 424 1990 2000 0 7 11 11 4l M2 512 2010 0 8 14 14 48 514 598 2020 0 to 17 17 55 588 687 8 17 18 0 335 381 sst 1970 3 0 11 24 29 0 540 604 1983 1990 0 13 28 34 0 794 869 2000 0 18 38 41 0 952 1049 2010 0 22 47 48 0 1807 1224 2020 0 27 57 55 0 1268 1407 5 1970 3 14 3 3 0 M2 465 1983 0 20 4 5 0 712 74l 1990 0 23 5 6 0 840 874 2000 0 31 7 7 0 1007 1052 2010 0 39 8 8 0 1171 1226 2020 0 47 10 9 0 4340 1407 0 0 0 i f, 46 285 321 55W 1970 1983 0 0 0 16 42 459 517 1990 0 0 0 19 49 541 609 2000 0 0 0 23 59 649 731 2010 0 0 0 26 69 755 850 2010 0 0 0 30 79 864 973 SW 1970 0 0 0 3 to 495 5 08 1983 0 ? 0 5 16 797 818 1990 0 0 0 6 19 940 965 2000 0 0 0 7 23 1128 1858 2010 0 0 0 8 26 1311 1345 2020 0 0 0 9 30 1501 1540 Wsw 1970 8 0 0 5 8 596 617 1983 0 0 0 8 13 960 981 1990 0 0 0 9 15 1124 1148 2000 0 0 0 11 18 1349 1378 I 2010 0 0 0 13 11 1568 1602 2020 0 0 0 15 24 1795 1834 2.1-22 1055 358 r(
D v
O]D w JU BFS n - -. .,
D @ T U - - Q TABLE 2.1-1 (Continued)
(
10-Mile M 4-5, 5-10 Total Sector Year M M 23 8 0 0 810 821 W 1970 0 3 13 0 0 1,305 1,323 1983 0 5 0 0 1.539 1,560 1990 0 6 15 0 0 1,846 1,871 2000 0 7 18.
8 22 0 0 2,145 2,175 2010 0 24 0 0 2,456 2,489 2020 0 9 0 3 23 35 WW 1970 3 3 3 .
0 5 5 0 5 37 52 1983 6 6 0 6 44 62 1990 0 0 7 7 0 7 52 73 2000 0 8 8 0 8 61 85 2010 2020 0 9 9 0 9 70 97 3 0 17 25 19 612 676 NW 1970 1983 0 0 24 36 27 874 %1
(
1990 0 0 28 42 32 1,025 1.127 2000 0 0 38 56 43 1,374 1.511 2010 0 0 47 70 53 1,703 I,873 2020 0 0 57 84 64 2,064 2,269 0 0 39 61 44 291 435 NW 1970 0 56 87 63 416 622 1983 0 0 0 65 102 74 487 728 1990 0 0 88 !37 99 653 977 2000 0 109 170 122 810 1,211 2010 0 206 148 982 1,468 2020 0 0 132 GRAND 7,253 TOTALS 1970 29 63 441 923 297 5.500 1,693 1,771 533 8.416 12,626 1983 0 213 1,768 1,946 629 9,997 14,572 1990 0 232 2,327 2,W5 801 12,275 18,I76 2000 0 308 2.706 958 14,469 21,006 2010 0 348 2.525
(
2,677 2.915 1.124 16,774 23,881 2020 0 391
- 2.1-23 qr y ad .}g g
.. m 9 o v o Ju 1"IId ~
( l 8
% l/ f }N i L lj
( . yawG T ~ ^~
~
t a-- -
4),,9 - - i l , l-c
- l l
$ t-- -
A~rilAWAH
, f -
"f Iv' i i l'
/- i ),A/lg f?N,- .
I i ul
~
] ~Q -
,. H. 'MT';n3;cAs ~ A NE c ' c. i I f
iI ,
[ ,
'c E;[a s 5 o. f .s l
CATOOSA. . ./ > i
~
7
~ '
'l / . e_5- 4) t C)C4TEAU +2
'c
$^6!x ,1 A '_gTi
._5 Mt.
- i w. i! /i \ rip.-
1i r
N *(/i -
'.~ l i i L. i .i--
3L.-:L_T..s / - . - - - , - . - _ , -
f.
5 b q
~' / 'l " , L *;----- f f 3Wi.7 1 %1 7 ~: , ' i~
11 u b?^ - M. \ l , se 4 l""~
i sg- Tmi,.
% a.o ,-'g -\ M '-
^" {*' ,
y -- 4(]q L q _..-,7 . . , . . 7 -_.y_ '
1j I '
- = -E-~
. ~j g- \ '
N ! J , __
-. y \ r."g- ,/ , / ,.,",
- f '/AZ:E
~~
r- .e - g g
-i .
l.
(\
x
- A
/ / _\-l /f -
,, ._!'_\,I ! \x' x ( p 'z-f N ,'
M E_ - i i
-v i
.i ;/ -
g, ' -. --.-
,e g . ,g -
fj,h j s.
l 7- . N -
t , .
(
T< 'i ? . h,,,\ , g. - ,
f.- ;,- it
-u- -
' -- . _, I .._._ .-
,/ _
J. ! i . j-\ , , ,
~~ --
- - ,ji ' U- S E~
_ j -
.g, -]n .V, 's -- mq
?
m+-
.,,- ,.:_; _ . _. .y ; ,
i.;.,. /..-
s y Il l _g COWE TA O-' j ; ;73 g g ., ,
l .
6 3"N[4=:., ~7, 2 ' L ;, l , M '
b ' ,
dj t I-
-d. ..
_, j il ! ._.- , ,
,) . --
0 I 2 o MILES SCALE: i i BFS 10-MILE RADIUS AREA MAP (REFERTOTABLE2.1-1)
FIGURE 2.1-6 7
2.1-48 1nC,F]
LJ > 0(V O e.tL
J o'
~/ /e j .
r ..-
\
4 q
t C" g'-
N s
o s
i e 4
~
g g, ?
s
^ e
- g 3 '
,. 5 \. .
h
^
~
t~ .
+
7
.-)
g, e .
&. l
- s. :
~ s* .:
, s , ,
- t.meaJ
, . qM * <.pO #("tmQ s& 4 sh *t g%s5 8
n
_~d $e# '
i R 4 S A Q'%), $h 4@J,0, ;' f b wd s?Ak I .
WmW sw4 b%.4$
~7
' a ,
h
$ nim._4 5 ! %
N .c S Q, jt m a ge$ yws gm,pD((%U1 $
a.$ %[Mn$4S%y/
- lh y yn&p.. h . ~.4T,Y 2M t%g;gh w I 3 J ,
/,4 M f'p;&i ..
~
y
+ -
dd y
g;,.w%p{@wM w
4m7 h .
fd f m. W %'% ~
%as~d ms y
,%%.l4 c"W
~
. ..~ .
p 3*a/vmj p a
^
- ~ o yiwe f% '
%_S 9g ^ pw q [hy plp g ,g n 4$v~I
' ,c 4 . f
.... y,,6t m~*v :
,M Ww $z W r, ~u g&ya v%g(L t
k@$
7p, ~
[. -l
- ; b;, .+'.: . b, , j%ket N
a
%L~ p e g g,.
ay - g% . n
%,Q f
p,, WSp ~
mg gjg 9f
%~
!* 4 gfy%hty,;ag i y;ds
- , jg _ ,
?% ,
h,pw,g
~ .
@e_
w Qpg m
~ ;
gy, r An . '.
Lu:g ,ng,,s}:;;;Qc l
g
- g. ts
., ;g gmy,wf';}q. y x
, n~. g
'(*
-- n.q
~."n j '
l'?l .
m4 Q mfptyf p m
?sg'gyh'N'waygm
- v g.g E
5 w$
- ..',j. .;k p gg y
.y p2 9sn5gg:,farg~.gm-fy , '
/g, aa*mj$'$gf
. 'y itY
.'.f A. =9,7 y
2 ,
> ,4 }v - -
e 3 x +
f
4 4
- +%%>
se 4
. e. .. <e 1,.
$<#&'+
T.ST TARG.T (MT-3) 1.0 M BA EM y ll EE u L"ILE UK l.25 1.4 1.6
+ 6- =
- 4 4$ 4%
- 'kff Yl?
g,hk
9 kk lYlQ M+W+
\ IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3)
$*4 #
NNNN 1.0 'dEA DM
!' @ LE I.i l,'" ILE I.8 1.25 1.4 1.6 l
~
>,,// ,,{
4 4
- b%
- ++ ,_. .. <e 1,.
%'+4 TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0 EDEBM y @ LE I.I [" EM 1.8 l
l.25 jj i.4 g 4 6" >
4% ++
- h>W,/
, 4);e$'%
. e BFS D*
Qv TABLE 2.1-1 n - -
d
( REGIONAL INCORPORATED COMMUNITY STATISTICS o L- 3 Distance and 1970 Populatio_n h h Direction inola P.oge rs 3 miles NE 948 New Tulsa Wagoner 8 miles WSW 17 Fair Oaks Wagoner 9 miles WW 23 Tiewsh* Rogers 10 miles N 95**
Catoosa Rogers 12 miles WW 970 Chouteau Mayes 13 miles ENE I 0%
Coweta wagoner 13 miles $$W 2.457 Broken Arrow Tulse 14 miles WSW 11.787 ,
Claremore Rogers 14 miles NNW 9,084 Wagoner Wagoner 15 milec SE 4.959 Red Bird Wagoner 16 miles 5 230 Porter Wagone r 18 miles 5 624 Pryor Mayes 19 milss NE 7.057 Owasso Tulsa 20 miles WNW 3.498 Tul' ahassee Wagoner 21 miles $$E 183 Haskell Muskogee 22 miles !$W 2.06)
Foyll Rogers 22 miles N 164 Simby Tulsa 23 miles SW 3.973 Locust Grove Mayes 23 miles ENE I.090 Okay Wagone r 23 miles SE 419 Tulsa Tulsa 23 miles u 330.350 Collinsville Tulsa 24 miles W 3.009 Jenks Tulse 25 miles W5W I.997 Taft Muskogee 25 mils 5 525 cologeh Rogers 25 miles NW 458 cherokee 26 miles E 82 Peggs Salina A.yes 26 miles ENE I.024 Hulbert C he rokee 26 mile s ESE 505 Adair Meyes 28 miles NE 459
- Tiawah is an unincorporated area within 10 miles of the plant site.
It has been included in this listing because of its proximity to the plant site.
- Tlemah population is estimated from abeelling counts on the County
( Highway Map insert.
2.1-9 1056 001 P
O O BFS o a JU m - -
D TABLE 2.1-3
~
LOCAL C010fUNITY POPULATION PROJECTION & DENSITY YEAR ESTIMATED POPULATION DENSITY Inola 948 237 (3 mi. NE) 1970 1974 1,176 345 1977 2,050 512 2,900 725 1980 3,080 770 1983 3,700 925 1990 4,200 1,050 2000 4,450 1,112 2010 4,600 1,150 2020 Tiawah 1970 95 127 (10 mi. N) 141 1974 106 1977 116 155 1980 125 167 1983 135 ISO 1990 159 212 2000 213 284 2010 264 352
( 2020 321 428 Residents per square mile.
( .
2.1-15 1056 002
?
- 0* %
BFS OvI O - - -
-- 2 I//% ~ '-
/ lx i 4
(. J '( N.[~ I* l
- e_ .v_
x-Th % -11i 1 n
9! WW ~' 'QN- ._.LN :!- sis
, n3 ; W J )
s 1.d/.A%dus
. .# y/ b/f g ,j ,f .,. to c i o. ,
4., . . -
. ~ .', -
-' ~
CATOOSA .
3 W TEA'J ',
- @i siiliLicum'nI.M-[, /Y G .. .
! L i\ % '.
.ffF r .;4 h- I _ ; h
$ 'E i / l- _
7 i
i( [
m, t
%i W ;xTw_#{ u
- ;\r
.i 3j ;
s) /IdwY m']l " '}
!!!@ ,,-l f )\ \% '\ \i .
t
(
,"i a: \r\ g(]Q. f )Q{ /i /.\/
- (3 t. i; t l' >
/],2 cit
! ! \by, t
,I a
j L e
t a .,'*
,f\]-,' N g .- f IEFT'ABUTWEK {
'Q ACCQ3 R0Ap_ '
l/ ' ,.
! \ #l Ts.h- ] \ '- j . f,(' i;- .
Q_ ,_- _
g*' 'l \ ! ! -
Ni_ y 'i K >
y: , g f ;
i K i i-
.j' y/j!bg .._..o 2
.{
4 . . ,
u.
7.j n .
G.o,s r
[_O[ I bh,[ . '
W.A i . NOTE: DOTTED LINE'IMDICATES -
I i
' /
~/ i~~~ ~*."$ ~*
- J TION.CE_ MEW STATE.j{lGHWA[ # ,~ ~ 7
, LOCATED IN THE AREA ,,, 's 4 - 4(. , ,e s.
r . v-g,0FBFS.
)! %. w' j, ',
/ 7 y,.. gg g -
\CO'A ETA } } ,
g- uy p \ . , -
j vi s ukp y.s !, -
I
.x . -
- 1- 2 - \t:!. -:-. - . ..- .....
. .s.-
0 I 2 3 4 5 F.HERGENCY EVACUATION ROUTES SCALE IN MILES FIGURE 13.3-3 h
\
7-on5n i3.'-
1056 003