ML19326B411: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 77: Line 77:
Licensing Supervisor Date-
Licensing Supervisor Date-
                                                                                                     // M s
                                                                                                     // M s
Approved by://7/[[8 s                'p Safe'ty Revi Date:
Approved by://7/((8 s                'p Safe'ty Revi Date:
f -dd - 7d                  g ommittee                  '
f -dd - 7d                  g ommittee                  '
Approved by:                    "
Approved by:                    "
nagerofNuclearSer(ides Date:          2o ' !'7
nagerofNuclearSer(ides Date:          2o ' !'7
                                                                                                   /
                                                                                                   /
                                                                                                                      -- ;
Approved by:fdV/////                  f?v. - [          Date:    [*8I'N[
Approved by:fdV/////                  f?v. - [          Date:    [*8I'N[
[
[

Latest revision as of 01:15, 16 March 2020

AO 500813/74-06:on 740811,reactor Protection Sys Channels A&D Tripped on High Flux During Pseudo Control Rod Ejection Test.Caused by Procedural Error.Procedure Changed & Emphasis Placed on in-limit Bypass
ML19326B411
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/19/1974
From: Cavanaugh W, Phillips J, Reuter D
ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML19326B408 List:
References
NUDOCS 8004150775
Download: ML19326B411 (3)


Text

- ,

.n h pe v

1. Abnormal Occurrence Report No. 50-313/74-6
2.
  • Report Date: 8-19-74 3. Occurrence Date: 8-11-74 '
4. Facility: Arkansas Nuclear One-Unit 1

. 5. Identification of Occurrence: Automatic Reactor Trip (RPS Channels A 4 D) on High Flux reportable under Tech. Spec. 1.8.6. Note: After re-evaluation and concurrence with Region 2 compliance, an automatic trip is not considered an abnormal occurrence per Tech. Spec. 1.8.6 and

6. Conditions Prior to Occurrence: /will not be defined as such in the future. -

Steady-State Power Reactor Power 0 Wth -

Hot Standby Net. Output 0 MWe Cold Shutdown Percent of Full Power 0  %

Refueling Shutdown .

Routine Startup Operation V Routine Shutdown '

~~

Operation Load Changes During Routine Power Operation

  • Other (Specify) X Zero Power Physics Testing After Initial Criticality. >
7. Description of Occurrence: -

i While obtaining the initial conditions for the pseudo-control rod ejection test, the reactor operator was withdrawing CRA 7-4 toward the out limit and compensating for the reactivity addition with CRA Group 5. l During the second withdrawal step of CRA 7-4, the startup rate increased I more rapidly than anticipated and the reactor operator attempted to reduce the startup rate by inserting CRA 7-4 which did not respond. As flux continued to increase, the operator selected CRA Group 5 and attempted to halt the power increase; however, the reactor tripped before Group 5 was "

able to turn the power excursion around. The total amount of positive reactivity added from just critical is estimated to be less than 0.1% -

AK/ K.

O) t x

800415077I -

July 5, 1974 NSP-10, Rev. O Page 1 of 3 ,

1

~

_ p a (7-~s)

%4 Abnormal' Occurrence Report No. 50-313/74-6 Sheet 2

8. Designation of Apparent Cause of Occurrence:

Design Procedure X Manufacturo Unusual Service Condition Including Installation / Environmental Construction Component Failure Operator -.

Other (Specify) .

Following the reactor trip, it was realized that the control rod "In-Limit Bypass" was required to allow CRA 7-4 to be inserted as the other members of this CRA group were at the In-Limit.

Os 9. Analysis of Occurrence:

( -,

\

Due to the fact that the Reactor Protection System high flux bistables were set to trip at less than an indicated 5% of full power (0.5% actual power due to a reduction of the power range amplifier gain trip at approximately 0.25% FP (2.5% indicated), no safety implications are apparent. All equipment functioned properly.

5 The occurrence is considered to be a fault of the Zero Power Physics Test Procedure, as this type of CRA operation is not normal. A caution ,

note should have been included in the test procedure to prepare the operator for such an occurrence. ,

10. Corrective Action:

Procedure changes were initiated (and implemented the same day) which explicitly caution the operator and test team to be aware of the need to use the in-limit bypass for operation of CRA',s) in the same group are at the in-limit. c d

July 5, 1974 NSP-l'O.. Rev. O Page 2 of 3

m a

.. . \

p Mc Abnormal Occurrence Report No. 50-313/74-6 Sheet 3

11. Pailure Data:

There have been no other occurrences of this type. No equipment mal-function was involved. ,

~

i

. i

12. Reviews and Approvals:

Reviewed and Approved by: Plant Safety Committee Yes ( No ( )

O N2 Plant Superintendent

Reference:

Yes % No ( ) ._

T(A) 0 - N8 Date: 7 //

a' Reviewed by:

Licensing Supervisor Date-

// M s

Approved by://7/((8 s 'p Safe'ty Revi Date:

f -dd - 7d g ommittee '

Approved by: "

nagerofNuclearSer(ides Date: 2o ' !'7

/

Approved by:fdV///// f?v. - [ Date: [*8I'N[

[

~

'Dir'ector 5f Power Production  !

Approved by: , -), /[ . /

.u Date: Y / 7IP

./ Senior Vic'e Pfesident '

. 1 I

l

\ 3-  !

J  !

l July S, 1974 NSP-10, Rev. O Page 3 of 3 l

- ~: