ML18082A076: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML18082A076 | | number = ML18082A076 | ||
| issue date = 03/23/2018 | | issue date = 03/23/2018 | ||
| title = | | title = NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance for Review of Application Concerning Revisions to the Technical Specification Surveillance Requirements for APRM Channel Adjustment | ||
| author name = Green K | | author name = Green K | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII | ||
| addressee name = Lashley P | | addressee name = Lashley P | ||
| addressee affiliation = FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co | | addressee affiliation = FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co | ||
| docket = 05000440 | | docket = 05000440 | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Green, Kimberly Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 7:10 AM To: Lashley, Phil H. | ||
Cc: Heintz, Calvin J. | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
| Line 24: | Line 25: | ||
==Dear Mr. Lashley:== | ==Dear Mr. Lashley:== | ||
By letter dated February 14, 2018, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company submitted an amendment request for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant. The proposed amendment would adopt Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) traveler TSTF-546, | |||
The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) | By letter dated February 14, 2018, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company submitted an amendment request for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant. The proposed amendment would adopt Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) traveler TSTF-546, Revise APRM Channel Adjustment Surveillance Requirement, and revise existing Technical Specifications (TSs) Surveillance Requirement 3.3.1.1.2 to verify that the calculated power is no more than 2 percent greater than the average power range monitor (APRM) channel output. | ||
The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of the proposed license amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | |||
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. | Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | ||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::100 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by the requested dated of February 28, 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates will be communicated, during the routine interactions. | |||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::100 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by the requested dated of February 28, 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates will be communicated, during the routine interactions. | These estimates are based on the staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1627. | |||
Sincerely, Kimberly J. Green, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III 1 | |||
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 2 | |||
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 255 Mail Envelope Properties (BN3PR09MB05647E07B6CDA94A688AB7208FA80) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
ACCEPTANCE FOR REVIEW OF APPLICATION CONCERNING REVISIONS TO THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR APRM CHANNEL ADJUSTMENT (EPID L-2018-LLA-0041) (L-17-04 Sent Date: | ACCEPTANCE FOR REVIEW OF APPLICATION CONCERNING REVISIONS TO THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR APRM CHANNEL ADJUSTMENT (EPID L-2018-LLA-0041) (L-17-04 Sent Date: 3/23/2018 7:10:00 AM Received Date: 3/23/2018 7:09:00 AM From: Green, Kimberly Created By: Kimberly.Green@nrc.gov Recipients: | ||
"Heintz, Calvin J." <cjheintz@firstenergycorp.com> | |||
Tracking Status: None "Lashley, Phil H." <phlashley@firstenergycorp.com> | |||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: BN3PR09MB0564.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3185 3/23/2018 7:09:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: | |||
Recipients Received:}} | |||
Latest revision as of 13:29, 7 March 2020
| ML18082A076 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 03/23/2018 |
| From: | Kimberly Green Plant Licensing Branch III |
| To: | Lashley P FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
| References | |
| L-2018-LLA-0041 | |
| Download: ML18082A076 (3) | |
Text
NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Green, Kimberly Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 7:10 AM To: Lashley, Phil H.
Cc: Heintz, Calvin J.
Subject:
ACCEPTANCE FOR REVIEW OF APPLICATION CONCERNING REVISIONS TO THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR APRM CHANNEL ADJUSTMENT (EPID L-2018-LLA-0041) (L-17-04
Dear Mr. Lashley:
By letter dated February 14, 2018, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company submitted an amendment request for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant. The proposed amendment would adopt Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) traveler TSTF-546, Revise APRM Channel Adjustment Surveillance Requirement, and revise existing Technical Specifications (TSs) Surveillance Requirement 3.3.1.1.2 to verify that the calculated power is no more than 2 percent greater than the average power range monitor (APRM) channel output.
The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of the proposed license amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 100 hours4.167 days <br />0.595 weeks <br />0.137 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by the requested dated of February 28, 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates will be communicated, during the routine interactions.
These estimates are based on the staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1627.
Sincerely, Kimberly J. Green, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III 1
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 2
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 255 Mail Envelope Properties (BN3PR09MB05647E07B6CDA94A688AB7208FA80)
Subject:
ACCEPTANCE FOR REVIEW OF APPLICATION CONCERNING REVISIONS TO THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR APRM CHANNEL ADJUSTMENT (EPID L-2018-LLA-0041) (L-17-04 Sent Date: 3/23/2018 7:10:00 AM Received Date: 3/23/2018 7:09:00 AM From: Green, Kimberly Created By: Kimberly.Green@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Heintz, Calvin J." <cjheintz@firstenergycorp.com>
Tracking Status: None "Lashley, Phil H." <phlashley@firstenergycorp.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: BN3PR09MB0564.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3185 3/23/2018 7:09:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: