IR 05000237/2017502: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 05/16/2017
| issue date = 05/16/2017
| title = Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection Report 05000237/2017502; 05000249/2017502 (Gph)
| title = Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection Report 05000237/2017502; 05000249/2017502 (Gph)
| author name = Orth S K
| author name = Orth S
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/PSB
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/PSB
| addressee name = Hanson B C
| addressee name = Hanson B
| addressee affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC, Exelon Nuclear
| addressee affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC, Exelon Nuclear
| docket = 05000237, 05000249
| docket = 05000237, 05000249
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUIT E 210 LISLE, IL 60532
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES May 16, 2017
-4352 May 16, 2017 Mr. Bryan Senior VP, Exelon Generation Co., LLC President and CNO, Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555


SUBJECT: DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3
==SUBJECT:==
- BASELINE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS BIENNIAL EXERCISE INSPECTION REPORT 05000 237/201 7 5 0 2; 05000 249/201 7 5 0 2
DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 - BASELINE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS BIENNIAL EXERCISE INSPECTION REPORT 05000237/2017502; 05000249/2017502


==Dear Mr. Hanson:==
==Dear Mr. Hanson:==
On April 20, 201 7, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a n inspection at the Dresden Nuclear Power Station , Units 2 and 3, and the NRC inspectors discussed the results of th is inspection with Mr. P. Karaba and other members of your staff.
On April 20, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3, and the NRC inspectors discussed the results of this inspection with Mr. P. Karaba and other members of your staff. The results of the inspection are documented in the enclosed report.
 
The results of the inspection are documented in the enclosed report.


The NRC inspectors did not identify any finding or violation of more than minor significance.
The NRC inspectors did not identify any finding or violation of more than minor significance.


This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading
This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.
-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulation s 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding."


Sincerely,
Sincerely,
/RA/ Steven K. Orth, Chief Plant Support Branch
/RA/
Steven K. Orth, Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-237, 50-249 License Nos. DPR-19; DPR-25 Enclosure:
IR 05000237/2017502; 05000249/2017502 cc: Distribution via LISTSERV
 
=SUMMARY=
IR 05000237/2017502; 05000249/2017502; 04/17/2017 - 04/20/2017; Dresden Nuclear Power


Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50
Station, Units 2 and 3; Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection;
-237, 50-249 License Nos. DPR
Exercise Evaluation Scenario Review; Performance Indicator Verification.
-19; DPR-25 Enclosure:
I R 05000 237/20 1 7502; 05000 249/20 1 7 502 cc: Distribution via LISTSERV


=SUMMARY=
This report covers a 1-week period of announced baseline inspection by four regional inspectors. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissions program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649,
I R 05000237/2017502; 05000249/2017 502; 0 4/1 7/201 7 - 0 4/20/201 7; Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3; Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection;
Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 5, dated February 201
Exercise Evaluation Scenario Review; Performance Indicator Verification
. This report covers a 1-w eek period of announced baseline inspection by f our regional inspectors. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG
-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process," Revision 5, dated February 20 14.


===NRC-Identified===
===NRC-Identified===
Line 55: Line 51:
No findings were identified.
No findings were identified.


===
===Licensee-Identified Violations===
Licensee-Identified Violations===


None 3
None


=REPORT DETAILS=
=REPORT DETAILS=
Line 64: Line 59:
==REACTOR SAFETY==
==REACTOR SAFETY==


===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness===
===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness===
 
{{a|1EP1}}
{{a|1EP}}
==1EP1 Exercise Evaluation==
==1EP 1 Exercise Evaluation==
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71114.01}}
 
(71114.0 1)
 
===.1 Exercise Evaluation===
===.1 Exercise Evaluation===


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed the April 19, 2017, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise's objectives and scenario to ensure that the exercise would acceptably test major elements of the licensee's Emergency Plan and to verify that the exercise's simulated problems provided an acceptable framework to support demonstration of the licensee's capability to implement its plan. The inspectors also reviewed records of other drills and exercises conducted from 2015 through 201 7, to verify that those drills' scenarios were sufficiently different from the scenario used in the April 19, 2017
The inspectors reviewed the April 19, 2017, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercises objectives and scenario to ensure that the exercise would acceptably test major elements of the licensees Emergency Plan and to verify that the exercises simulated problems provided an acceptable framework to support demonstration of the licensees capability to implement its plan. The inspectors also reviewed records of other drills and exercises conducted from 2015 through 2017, to verify that those drills scenarios were sufficiently different from the scenario used in the April 19, 2017, exercise.
, exercise. The inspectors evaluated the licensee's exercise performance, focusing on the risk-significant activities of emergency classification, notification, and protective action decision-making, implementation of accident mitigation strategies, and correction of past exercise weaknesses in the following emergency response facilities:
 
Control Room Simulator; Technical Support Center (TSC); Operations Support Center (OSC); and Emergency Operations Facility.
The inspectors evaluated the licensees exercise performance, focusing on the risk-significant activities of emergency classification, notification, and protective action decision-making, implementation of accident mitigation strategies, and correction of past exercise weaknesses in the following emergency response facilities:
* Control Room Simulator;
* Technical Support Center (TSC);
* Operations Support Center (OSC); and
* Emergency Operations Facility.


The inspectors also assessed the licensee's recognition of abnormal plant conditions, transfer of responsibilities between facilities, internal communications, interfaces with offsite officials, readiness of emergency facilities and related equipment, and overall implementation of the licensee's Emergency Plan.
The inspectors also assessed the licensees recognition of abnormal plant conditions, transfer of responsibilities between facilities, internal communications, interfaces with offsite officials, readiness of emergency facilities and related equipment, and overall implementation of the licensees Emergency Plan.


The inspectors attended post
The inspectors attended post-exercise critiques in the control room simulator, TSC, OSC, and emergency operations facility to evaluate the licensees initial self-assessment of its exercise performance. The inspectors later met with the licensees lead exercise evaluators and managers to obtain the licensees findings and assessments of its exercise participants performances. These self-assessments were then compared with the inspectors independent observations and assessments to assess the licensees ability to adequately critique its exercise performance. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.
-exercise critiques in the control room simulator , TSC , OSC, and emergency operations facility to evaluate the licensee's initial self
-assessment of its exercise performance. The inspectors later met with the licensee's lead exercise evaluators and managers to obtain the licensee's findings and assessments of its exercise participants' performances. These self
-assessments were then compared with the inspectors' independent observations and assessments to assess the licensee's ability to adequately critique its exercise performance. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.


This exercise evaluation inspection constituted one sample as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114.01.
This exercise evaluation inspection constituted one sample as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114.01.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified
No findings were identified. {{a|1EP8}}
.
==1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review==
 
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71114.08}}
{{a|1EP}}
==1EP 8 Exercise Evaluation==
 
- Scenario Review (71114.08)


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
Prior to the inspection activity on
Prior to the inspection activity on-site, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenarios submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission using IP 71114.08, Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the Emergency Plan as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50.47(b)(14). Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.
-site, the inspectors conducted an in
-office review of the exercise objectives and scenarios submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission using IP 71114.08, "Exercise Evaluation  
- Scenario Review," to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the Emergency Plan as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50.47(b)(14). Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.


This review of the exercise objectives and scenario constituted one inspection sample as defined in IP 71114.08.
This review of the exercise objectives and scenario constituted one inspection sample as defined in IP 71114.08.
Line 109: Line 95:
==OTHER ACTIVITIES==
==OTHER ACTIVITIES==


===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness===
===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness===
 
{{a|4OA1}}
{{a|4OA1}}
==4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification==
==4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification==
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71151}}
===.1 Drill/Exercise Performance===


(71151)
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Drill/Exercise Performance Indicator (PI) for the period from the first quarter of 2016 through fourth quarter of 2016.


===.1 Drill/Exercise Performance===
To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI; assessments of PI opportunities during pre-designated control room simulator training sessions, and performance during other drills. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.


====a. Inspection Scope====
This inspection constituted one Drill/Exercise Performance sample as defined in IP 71151.
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Drill/Exercise Performance Indicator (PI) for the period from the first quarter of 2016 through fourth quarter of 2016. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Document 99
-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 7, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's records associated with the PI to verify that the licens ee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI
; assessments of PI opportunities during pre
-designated control room simulator training sessions, and performance during other drills. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection constituted one Drill/Exercise Performance sample as defined in IP 71151.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 130: Line 114:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the ERO Drill Participation PI for the period from the first quarter of 2016 through fourth quarter of 2016. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the ERO Drill Participation PI for the period from the first quarter of 2016 through fourth quarter of 2016. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI; performance during the 2016 exercises and drills; and revisions of the roster of personnel assigned to key ERO positions. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.
-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 7, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI; performance during the 2016 exercises and drills; and revisions of the roster of personnel assigned to key ERO positions. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection constituted one ERO Drill Participation sample as defined in IP 71151.
 
This inspection constituted one ERO Drill Participation sample as defined in IP 71151.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 139: Line 124:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Alert and Notification System (ANS) PI for the period from the first quarter of 2016 through fourth quarter of 2016. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Alert and Notification System (ANS) PI for the period from the first quarter of 2016 through fourth quarter of 2016. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI and results of periodic scheduled ANS operability tests. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.
-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 7, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI and results of periodic scheduled ANS operability tests. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.


This inspection constituted one ANS sample as defined in IP 71151.
This inspection constituted one ANS sample as defined in IP 71151.
Line 146: Line 130:
====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified.
No findings were identified.
 
{{a|4OA6}}
{{a|4OA6}}
==4OA6 Management Meetings==
==4OA6 Management Meetings==


===.1 Exit Meeting Summary===
===.1 Exit Meeting Summary===


On April 20 , 2017, the inspectors presented the biennial exercise inspection results to Mr. P. Karaba , and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented.
On April 20, 2017, the inspectors presented the biennial exercise inspection results to Mr. P. Karaba, and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary.


The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary.
ATTACHMENT:


ATTACHMENT: 
=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=


=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=
==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT==


SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION KEY POINTS OF CONTAC
Licensee
T Licensee  
: [[contact::P. Karaba]], Site Vice President
: [[contact::P. Karaba ]], Site Vice President
: [[contact::J. Washko]], Plant Manager
: [[contact::J. Washko]], Plant Manager  
: [[contact::B. Franzen]], Regulatory Assurance Manager
: [[contact::B. Franzen]], Regulatory Assurance Manager
: [[contact::J. Quinn]], Maintenance Director
: [[contact::J. Quinn]], Maintenance Director
: [[contact::T. Dean]], Training Director
: [[contact::T. Dean]], Training Director
: [[contact::W. Remaisz]], Acting Work Management
: [[contact::W. Remaisz]], Acting Work Management Director
Director  
: [[contact::A. Daniels]], Midwest Emergency Preparedness Manager
: [[contact::A. Daniels]], Midwest Emergency Preparedness Manager
: [[contact::J. Feigl]], Engineering Manager
: [[contact::J. Feigl]], Engineering Manager
Line 175: Line 156:
: [[contact::L. Antos]], Security Manager
: [[contact::L. Antos]], Security Manager
: [[contact::R. Bauman]], Shift Operations Superintendent
: [[contact::R. Bauman]], Shift Operations Superintendent
: [[contact::R. Miller ]], Emergency Preparedness
: [[contact::R. Miller]], Emergency Preparedness Specialist
Specialist
: [[contact::R. Martin]], Emergency Preparedness Specialist (Corporate)
: [[contact::R. Martin]], Emergency Preparedness Specialist (Corporate)
: [[contact::E. Maloni ]], Emergency Preparedness Specialist (Corporate)
: [[contact::E. Maloni]], Emergency Preparedness Specialist (Corporate)
: [[contact::C. Nelson ]], Emergency Preparedness Specialist (Corporate)
: [[contact::C. Nelson]], Emergency Preparedness Specialist (Corporate)
: [[contact::D. Walker]], NRC Coordinator
: [[contact::D. Walker]], NRC Coordinator
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissio
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
n
: [[contact::G. Roach]], Senior Resident Inspector
: [[contact::G. Roach]], Senior Resident Inspector
: [[contact::J. Wojewoda ]], Resident Inspector, Acting LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUS
: [[contact::J. Wojewoda]], Resident Inspector, Acting
SED Opened, Closed, and Discussed
 
==LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED==
 
===Opened, Closed, and Discussed===
 
None
None
LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED The following is a partial list of documents reviewed during the inspection. Inclusion on this list does not imply that the NRC inspector
s reviewed the documents in their entirety, but rather that selected sections or portions of the documents were evaluated as part of the overall inspection effort. Inclusion of a document on this list does not imply NRC acceptance of the document or any part of it, unless this is stated in the body of the inspection report.
1EP 1 Exercise Evaluation
(71114.0 1) - EP-AA-1000; Exelon Nuclear Standardized Radiological Emergency Plan; Revision
- EP-AA-100 4; Exelon Nuclear Radiological Emergency Plan Annex for Dresden Station; Revision 3 5  - EP-AA-1004 , Addendum 1; Dresden Station On
-Shift Staffing Technical Basis;
Revision 1
- EP-AA-1004, Addendum
3; Exelon Nuclear Emergency Action Levels for Dresden Station; Revision 5 - EP-AA-110; Assessment of Emergencies; Revision
- EP-AA-111; Emergency Classification and Protective Action Recommendations;
Revision 19
  - EP-AA-111-F-0 4; Dresden Plant Based PAR Flowchart - EP-AA-112; Emergency Response Organization (ERO)/Emergency Response Facility Activation and Operation; Revision
- EP-AA-113; Personnel Protective Actions; Revision
2 - EP-AA-114; Notifications; Revision
- EP-AA-115; Termination and Recovery; Revision 9 - EP-AA-121; Emergency Response Facilities and Equipment Readiness; Revision 15
- EP-AA-122; Drills and Exercise Program; Revision 1
- EP-AA-122-300-F-01; Drill and Exercise Evaluation Criteria; Revision
H - Dresden 2015 NRC Graded Exercise Evaluation Report; Dated July 29, 201 5 - Dresden 2015 Pre Exercise Evaluation Report
- Revision 1; Dated June 17, 2015
- Dresden 2016 Off
-Year Exercise Evaluation Report; Dated June 7, 2016 - Dresden 201
NRC Graded Exercise Evaluation Report; Dated April 19, 201 7 - PowerPoint Presentation; Dresden Biennial Exercise
- Review of Exercise Results
and Critique; Dated April 19, 2017
- Two-Year List of Drill and Exercise
Condition Reports; April 2015
- April 2017
- Two Years of Drill and Exercise Timelines; April 2015
- April 2017
- A R 025 13026; EP-Enhancement Identified in URI Dose Assessment Model
;  Dated June 10, 2015 - AR 02535105; Dresden NRC EP Exercise
- Assembly/Accountability
- OSC;  Dated July 30, 2015
- AR 025 3 9103; DRE-EP-2015-NRC-EX-SIM-Other Issues; Dated August 7, 2015
- AR 0253 9106; DRE-EP-2015-NRC-EX-TSC-Other Issues; Dated August 7, 2015
- AR 02539107; DRE
-EP-2015-NRC-EX-OSC-Other Issues; Dated August 7, 2015
- AR 02539115; DRE
-EP-2015-NRC-EX-Station-Program; Dated August 7, 2015
- AR 02560019; EP
-NARS Form Attention to Detail Error
Trend; Dated September 24, 2015
- AR 02560387; 4Q EP Drill Roll
-Up IR; Dated November 20, 2015 - AR 02643990; EP
-ANS Addendum Not Updated Following Siren Upgrades;
Dated March 22, 2016


- AR 02645512; EP
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
-1Q16 Full PI Drill Facilities and Equipment; Dated March 25, 2016 - AR 02652776; NOS ID:
Enhancement for OSC Radio Inventory; Dated April 8, 2016
- AR 02652785; NOS ID:
Enhancement for EP Vehicles; Dated April 8, 2016
  - AR 02667268; Inadvertent Siren Activation of Will County Sirens; Dated May 9, 2016
- AR 026 79009; EP DEP PI Not Evaluated for TSC Focus Area Drill; Dated June 8, 2016 - AR 02 730970; EP-3Q16 Focus Area Drill Facilities and Equipment Issues
;  Dated October 21, 2016
- AR 02 730975; EP-3Q16 Focus Area Drill OSC Comments; Dated October 21, 2016
- AR 02 730981; EP-3Q16 Focus Area Drill TSC Comments; Dated October 21, 2016
- AR 0 3971624; Deficiencies Found in TSC Quarterly Inventory; Dated February 8, 2016 1EP8 Exercise Evaluation
- Scenario Review
(71114.08)
- Dresden Station 201 7 NRC Graded Exercise Manual 60 Day Submittal;
Dated February 15, 201 7 4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification
(71151) - NRC PI Data Sheets; NRC Indicator ANS Reliability; January 2016
- December 2016
- NRC PI Data Sheets; ERO Readiness; January 2016
- December 2016
- NRC PI Data Sheets; Drill/Exercise Performance; January 2016
- December 2016


LIST OF ACRONYMS USE
D ANS Alert and Notification System
ERO Emergency Response Organization
IP Inspection Procedure
NEI Nuclear Energy Institute
NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
OSC Operations Support Center
PI Performance Indicator
TSC Technical Support Center
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 15:54, 19 December 2019

Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection Report 05000237/2017502; 05000249/2017502 (Gph)
ML17136A358
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/16/2017
From: Steven Orth
Plant Support Branch II
To: Bryan Hanson
Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
References
IR 2017502
Download: ML17136A358 (12)
v • d • e


Text

UNITED STATES May 16, 2017

SUBJECT:

DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 - BASELINE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS BIENNIAL EXERCISE INSPECTION REPORT 05000237/2017502; 05000249/2017502

Dear Mr. Hanson:

On April 20, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3, and the NRC inspectors discussed the results of this inspection with Mr. P. Karaba and other members of your staff. The results of the inspection are documented in the enclosed report.

The NRC inspectors did not identify any finding or violation of more than minor significance.

This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Steven K. Orth, Chief Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-237, 50-249 License Nos. DPR-19; DPR-25 Enclosure:

IR 05000237/2017502; 05000249/2017502 cc: Distribution via LISTSERV

SUMMARY

IR 05000237/2017502; 05000249/2017502; 04/17/2017 - 04/20/2017; Dresden Nuclear Power

Station, Units 2 and 3; Baseline Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection;

Exercise Evaluation Scenario Review; Performance Indicator Verification.

This report covers a 1-week period of announced baseline inspection by four regional inspectors. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissions program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649,

Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 5, dated February 201

NRC-Identified

and Self-Revealed Findings

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness

No findings were identified.

Licensee-Identified Violations

None

REPORT DETAILS

REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness

1EP1 Exercise Evaluation

Main article: IP 71114.01

.1 Exercise Evaluation

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the April 19, 2017, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercises objectives and scenario to ensure that the exercise would acceptably test major elements of the licensees Emergency Plan and to verify that the exercises simulated problems provided an acceptable framework to support demonstration of the licensees capability to implement its plan. The inspectors also reviewed records of other drills and exercises conducted from 2015 through 2017, to verify that those drills scenarios were sufficiently different from the scenario used in the April 19, 2017, exercise.

The inspectors evaluated the licensees exercise performance, focusing on the risk-significant activities of emergency classification, notification, and protective action decision-making, implementation of accident mitigation strategies, and correction of past exercise weaknesses in the following emergency response facilities:

  • Control Room Simulator;
  • Operations Support Center (OSC); and
  • Emergency Operations Facility.

The inspectors also assessed the licensees recognition of abnormal plant conditions, transfer of responsibilities between facilities, internal communications, interfaces with offsite officials, readiness of emergency facilities and related equipment, and overall implementation of the licensees Emergency Plan.

The inspectors attended post-exercise critiques in the control room simulator, TSC, OSC, and emergency operations facility to evaluate the licensees initial self-assessment of its exercise performance. The inspectors later met with the licensees lead exercise evaluators and managers to obtain the licensees findings and assessments of its exercise participants performances. These self-assessments were then compared with the inspectors independent observations and assessments to assess the licensees ability to adequately critique its exercise performance. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.

This exercise evaluation inspection constituted one sample as defined in Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114.01.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review

Main article: IP 71114.08

a. Inspection Scope

Prior to the inspection activity on-site, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenarios submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission using IP 71114.08, Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the Emergency Plan as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50.47(b)(14). Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.

This review of the exercise objectives and scenario constituted one inspection sample as defined in IP 71114.08.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

OTHER ACTIVITIES

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness

4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification

Main article: IP 71151

.1 Drill/Exercise Performance

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Drill/Exercise Performance Indicator (PI) for the period from the first quarter of 2016 through fourth quarter of 2016.

To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI; assessments of PI opportunities during pre-designated control room simulator training sessions, and performance during other drills. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.

This inspection constituted one Drill/Exercise Performance sample as defined in IP 71151.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.2 Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Drill Participation

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the ERO Drill Participation PI for the period from the first quarter of 2016 through fourth quarter of 2016. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI; performance during the 2016 exercises and drills; and revisions of the roster of personnel assigned to key ERO positions. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.

This inspection constituted one ERO Drill Participation sample as defined in IP 71151.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

.3 Alert and Notification System

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors sampled licensee submittals for the Alert and Notification System (ANS) PI for the period from the first quarter of 2016 through fourth quarter of 2016. To determine the accuracy of the PI data reported during those periods, PI definitions and guidance contained in the NEI Document 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7, were used. The inspectors reviewed the licensees records associated with the PI to verify that the licensee accurately reported the indicator in accordance with relevant procedures and the NEI guidance. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licensee records and processes including procedural guidance on assessing opportunities for the PI and results of periodic scheduled ANS operability tests. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.

This inspection constituted one ANS sample as defined in IP 71151.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA6 Management Meetings

.1 Exit Meeting Summary

On April 20, 2017, the inspectors presented the biennial exercise inspection results to Mr. P. Karaba, and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary.

ATTACHMENT:

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee

P. Karaba, Site Vice President
J. Washko, Plant Manager
B. Franzen, Regulatory Assurance Manager
J. Quinn, Maintenance Director
T. Dean, Training Director
W. Remaisz, Acting Work Management Director
A. Daniels, Midwest Emergency Preparedness Manager
J. Feigl, Engineering Manager
G. Baxa, Manager CMO
D. Doggett, Emergency Preparedness Manager
L. Antos, Security Manager
R. Bauman, Shift Operations Superintendent
R. Miller, Emergency Preparedness Specialist
R. Martin, Emergency Preparedness Specialist (Corporate)
E. Maloni, Emergency Preparedness Specialist (Corporate)
C. Nelson, Emergency Preparedness Specialist (Corporate)
D. Walker, NRC Coordinator

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

G. Roach, Senior Resident Inspector
J. Wojewoda, Resident Inspector, Acting

LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED

Opened, Closed, and Discussed

None

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000237/2017502&oldid=2282031"