ML080300243: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML080300243
| number = ML080300243
| issue date = 01/30/2008
| issue date = 01/30/2008
| title = 2008/01/30-Letter Denying Exemption Request Filed by Susan Shapiro Concerning Indian Point 3 Fire Protection Standards
| title = Letter Denying Exemption Request Filed by Susan Shapiro Concerning Indian Point 3 Fire Protection Standards
| author name = Vietti-Cook A L
| author name = Vietti-Cook A
| author affiliation = NRC/SECY
| author affiliation = NRC/SECY
| addressee name = Shapiro S
| addressee name = Shapiro S
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = Legal-Correspondence
| document type = Legal-Correspondence
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
| project =
| stage = Other
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Susan Shapiro, Esquire 12 Perlman Drive Spring Valley, NY 10977 RE: Objection to NRC's grant of an exemption to Indian Point Unit 3
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 January 30, 2008 SECRETARY Susan Shapiro, Esquire 12 Perlman Drive Spring Valley, NY 10977 RE:   Objection to NRCs grant of an exemption to Indian Point Unit 3


==Dear Ms. Shapiro:==
==Dear Ms. Shapiro:==


We received your petition on behalf of several organizations expressing your objection to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) September 28, 2007 grant of an exemption concerning Indian Point Unit 3 fire protection standards. The action you are challenging is an exemption from NRC regulations; it is not a license amendment as asserted in your petition. In Commonwealth Edison Co. (Zion Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 & 2), CLI-00-5, 51 NRC 90 (2000), the Commission examined the text and legislative history of §189a. of the Atomic Energy Act and concluded that the Atomic Energy Act does not provide for hearings on exemptions from NRC regulations. See also Kelley v. Selin, 42 F.3d 1501, 1517 (6 th Cir. 1995), ("[T]he grant of an exemption from a generic requirement does not constitute an amendment to the reactor's license that would trigger hearing rights.") Accordingly, your request for a hearing is denied.
We received your petition on behalf of several organizations expressing your objection to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) September 28, 2007 grant of an exemption concerning Indian Point Unit 3 fire protection standards. The action you are challenging is an exemption from NRC regulations; it is not a license amendment as asserted in your petition. In Commonwealth Edison Co. (Zion Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 & 2), CLI-00-5, 51 NRC 90 (2000), the Commission examined the text and legislative history of §189a. of the Atomic Energy Act and concluded that the Atomic Energy Act does not provide for hearings on exemptions from NRC regulations. See also Kelley v. Selin, 42 F.3d 1501, 1517 (6th Cir. 1995), ([T]he grant of an exemption from a generic requirement does not constitute an amendment to the reactors license that would trigger hearing rights.) Accordingly, your request for a hearing is denied.
Sincerely,
Sincerely,
          /RA/
                                                        /RA/
Annette Vietti-Cook Martin J. O'Neill, Esquire  
Annette Vietti-Cook Martin J. ONeill, Esquire}}
 
UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 January 30, 2008 SECRETAR Y}}

Latest revision as of 08:28, 7 December 2019

Letter Denying Exemption Request Filed by Susan Shapiro Concerning Indian Point 3 Fire Protection Standards
ML080300243
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 01/30/2008
From: Annette Vietti-Cook
NRC/SECY
To: Shapiro S
SECY/RAS
References
50-286, RAS 14989
Download: ML080300243 (1)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 January 30, 2008 SECRETARY Susan Shapiro, Esquire 12 Perlman Drive Spring Valley, NY 10977 RE: Objection to NRCs grant of an exemption to Indian Point Unit 3

Dear Ms. Shapiro:

We received your petition on behalf of several organizations expressing your objection to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRC) September 28, 2007 grant of an exemption concerning Indian Point Unit 3 fire protection standards. The action you are challenging is an exemption from NRC regulations; it is not a license amendment as asserted in your petition. In Commonwealth Edison Co. (Zion Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 & 2), CLI-00-5, 51 NRC 90 (2000), the Commission examined the text and legislative history of §189a. of the Atomic Energy Act and concluded that the Atomic Energy Act does not provide for hearings on exemptions from NRC regulations. See also Kelley v. Selin, 42 F.3d 1501, 1517 (6th Cir. 1995), ([T]he grant of an exemption from a generic requirement does not constitute an amendment to the reactors license that would trigger hearing rights.) Accordingly, your request for a hearing is denied.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Annette Vietti-Cook Martin J. ONeill, Esquire