ML093130526: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:November 20, 2009 Mr. Terrance G. Alexander, Executive Director Occupational Safety & Environmental Health University of Michigan Campus Safety Services Building 1239 Kipke Drive Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1010 | {{#Wiki_filter:November 20, 2009 Mr. Terrance G. Alexander, Executive Director Occupational Safety & Environmental Health University of Michigan Campus Safety Services Building 1239 Kipke Drive Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1010 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
REPORT OF OCTOBER 23, 2009, OPEN MEETING WITH UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN TO DISCUSS DECOMMISSIONING STATUS OF FORD NUCLEAR REACTOR | REPORT OF OCTOBER 23, 2009, OPEN MEETING WITH UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN TO DISCUSS DECOMMISSIONING STATUS OF FORD NUCLEAR REACTOR | ||
==Dear Mr. Alexander:== | ==Dear Mr. Alexander:== | ||
Enclosed is a report of the October 23, 2009, open meeting between staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and representatives of University of Michigan and DeNuke Services. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the decommissioning status of the Ford Nuclear Reactor and the University of | Enclosed is a report of the October 23, 2009, open meeting between staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and representatives of University of Michigan and DeNuke Services. | ||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the | The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the decommissioning status of the Ford Nuclear Reactor and the University of Michigans upcoming submittal of a Final Status Survey Plan for the Ford Nuclear Reactor. | ||
Kristina L. Banovac, Project Manager | In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice for Domestic Licensing Proceedings and Issuance of Orders, a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRCs Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). | ||
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. | |||
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at 301-415-5114 or kristina.banovac@nrc.gov. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ | |||
Kristina L. Banovac, Project Manager Reactor Decommissioning Branch Decommissioning and Uranium Recovery Licensing Directorate Division of Waste Management and Environmental Protection Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
October 23, 2009, | October 23, 2009, Open Meeting Report Docket No.: 50-02 License No.: R-28 cc: University of Michigan - Ford Nuclear Reactor Service List | ||
November 20, 2009 Mr. Terrance G. Alexander, Executive Director Occupational Safety & Environmental Health University of Michigan Campus Safety Services Building 1239 Kipke Drive Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1010 | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
REPORT OF OCTOBER 23, 2009, OPEN MEETING WITH UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN TO DISCUSS DECOMMISSIONING STATUS OF FORD NUCLEAR REACTOR | REPORT OF OCTOBER 23, 2009, OPEN MEETING WITH UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN TO DISCUSS DECOMMISSIONING STATUS OF FORD NUCLEAR REACTOR | ||
==Dear Mr. Alexander:== | ==Dear Mr. Alexander:== | ||
Enclosed is a report of the October 23, 2009, open meeting between staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and representatives of University of Michigan and DeNuke Services. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the decommissioning status of the Ford Nuclear Reactor and the University of | Enclosed is a report of the October 23, 2009, open meeting between staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and representatives of University of Michigan and DeNuke Services. | ||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the | The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the decommissioning status of the Ford Nuclear Reactor and the University of Michigans upcoming submittal of a Final Status Survey Plan for the Ford Nuclear Reactor. | ||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice for Domestic Licensing Proceedings and Issuance of Orders, a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRCs Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). | |||
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. | |||
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at 301-415-5114 or kristina.banovac@nrc.gov. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ | |||
Kristina L. Banovac, Project Manager Reactor Decommissioning Branch Decommissioning and Uranium Recovery Licensing Directorate Division of Waste Management and Environmental Protection Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
ML093130526 Office DWMEP:PM DWMEP:LA DWMEP:BC DWMEP:PM Name KBanovac SMichonski APersinko KBanovac Date 11/ 13 /09 11/ 13 /09 11/ 19 /09 11/ 20 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY | October 23, 2009, Open Meeting Report Docket No.: 50-02 License No.: R-28 cc: University of Michigan - Ford Nuclear Reactor Service List DISTRIBUTION: | ||
DOrlando WSnell JTapp CLipa SGiebel ML093130526 Office DWMEP:PM DWMEP:LA DWMEP:BC DWMEP:PM Name KBanovac SMichonski APersinko KBanovac Date 11/ 13 /09 11/ 13 /09 11/ 19 /09 11/ 20 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY | |||
University of Michigan - Ford Nuclear Reactor Service List cc: | University of Michigan - Ford Nuclear Reactor Service List cc: | ||
Mr. Mark L. Driscoll, Radiation Safety Officer Occupational Safety & Environmental Health University of Michigan Campus Safety Services Building 1239 Kipke Drive Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1010 Dr. Mark M. Banaszak Holl, Ph.D., Associate Vice President Office of Vice President for Research, Natural Science and Engineering Fleming Building / Room 4079 503 Thompson Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1340 Mr. Curt W. Smitka, Director Budget & Administration Office of Vice President for Research Fleming Building / Room 4056 503 Thompson Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1340 Mr. Robert B. Blackburn, Manager Ford Nuclear Reactor - Decommissioning Project Phoenix Memorial Laboratory / Room 3034 2301 Bonisteel Boulevard Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2100 Special Assistant to the Governor Office of the Governor Room 1 - State Capitol Lansing, MI 48909 Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Waste and Hazardous Materials Division Hazardous Waste and Radiological Protection Section Nuclear Facilities Unit, 525 West Allegan Street P.O. Box 30241 Lansing, MI 48909-7741 Test, Research, and Training Reactor Newsletter University of Florida 202 Nuclear Sciences Center Gainesville, FL 32611 | |||
OPEN MEETING REPORT Date: October 23, 2009 Time: 2:00 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. | |||
Place: University of Michigan Phoenix Memorial Laboratory 2301 Bonisteel Blvd Room 3028 (3rd floor) | |||
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2100 | |||
Place: | |||
==Purpose:== | |||
Meeting with University of Michigan (licensee) to discuss decommissioning status of the Ford Nuclear Reactor and University of Michigans upcoming submittal of a Final Status Survey Plan Attendees: See Attachment Discussion: | |||
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Project Manager opened the meeting. The licensee presented the status of decommissioning at the Ford Nuclear Reactor (FNR) site, describing recent work that was completed and the remaining characterization and remediation activities at the site. The licensee has completed most of the remediation activities. It will continue to complete characterization of soils and areas in the reactor building and remediate these areas, as needed. The licensee noted that funding is available for completion of the decommissioning project at FNR. | |||
The licensee expects to submit its Final Status Survey Plan (FSSP) to the NRC for review and approval in January 2010. The licensee will inform the NRC of any schedule changes. The licensee plans to submit one complete FSSP for NRC review, rather than submitting individual portions of it for review. The licensee will submit the FSSP as a license amendment request, requesting approval of the FSSP and incorporation into the decommissioning plan (DP), which was approved on June 26, 2006, via Amendment No. 50 to License No. R-28 for FNR. | The licensee expects to submit its Final Status Survey Plan (FSSP) to the NRC for review and approval in January 2010. The licensee will inform the NRC of any schedule changes. The licensee plans to submit one complete FSSP for NRC review, rather than submitting individual portions of it for review. The licensee will submit the FSSP as a license amendment request, requesting approval of the FSSP and incorporation into the decommissioning plan (DP), which was approved on June 26, 2006, via Amendment No. 50 to License No. R-28 for FNR. | ||
The FNR DP was approved with license conditions, which require the licensee to submit reports of all characterization surveys performed that were not part of the DP application. The license conditions also require the licensee to submit a complete FSSP for NRC review and approval, prior to performing the final status survey (FSS). The FSSP will need to address areas and topics that were not completely described in the DP and provide information and details regarding proposed clean-up levels and the proposed FSS of the site. NRC and licensee staff discussed the open items in the FNR DP that will need to be addressed in the upcoming FSSP. | The FNR DP was approved with license conditions, which require the licensee to submit reports of all characterization surveys performed that were not part of the DP application. The license conditions also require the licensee to submit a complete FSSP for NRC review and approval, prior to performing the final status survey (FSS). The FSSP will need to address areas and topics that were not completely described in the DP and provide information and details regarding proposed clean-up levels and the proposed FSS of the site. NRC and licensee staff discussed the open items in the FNR DP that will need to be addressed in the upcoming FSSP. | ||
Enclosure | |||
2 Regarding the licensees proposed use of screening values, the licensee will need to demonstrate in the FSSP that the particular site conditions (e.g., physical and source term conditions) are compatible and consistent with the DandD model code assumptions and default parameters. The licensee may use the RESRAD model code to calculate derived concentration guideline levels (DCGLs) for any radionuclides of concern that are not included in NRCs list of screening values or are not included in the DandD code. NRC staff also noted that the licensee needs to discuss the reasonably foreseeable land use for the site in the FSSP, as the DP does not address this. | |||
The licensee will need to calculate DCGLs for any volumetrically contaminated surfaces, embedded pipes, or contaminated subsurface soils. The licensee noted that it has bored most of the embedded pipe out of concrete walls and floors and plans to remove the remainder of the embedded pipe. | The licensee will need to calculate DCGLs for any volumetrically contaminated surfaces, embedded pipes, or contaminated subsurface soils. The licensee noted that it has bored most of the embedded pipe out of concrete walls and floors and plans to remove the remainder of the embedded pipe. | ||
The licensee will also need to discuss subsurface soils and groundwater in the FSSP. The licensee will provide the characterization results from the reactor pool and any leakage pathways, such as cracks in the foundation under the pool. The licensee will also submit characterization data for the concrete floor beneath the reactor core and a demonstration that neutron activation of the soil beneath the reactor pool did not occur. The licensee will also need to provide all groundwater sampling and characterization data that was not included in the DP. The licensee will need to include discussion in the FSSP confirming that groundwater contamination is not an issue at the site. | The licensee will also need to discuss subsurface soils and groundwater in the FSSP. The licensee will provide the characterization results from the reactor pool and any leakage pathways, such as cracks in the foundation under the pool. The licensee will also submit characterization data for the concrete floor beneath the reactor core and a demonstration that neutron activation of the soil beneath the reactor pool did not occur. The licensee will also need to provide all groundwater sampling and characterization data that was not included in the DP. | ||
NRC staff discussed its responsibilities under the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on consultation and finality on decommissioning and decontamination of contaminated sites. Per the MOU, the staff must consult with EPA if the planned level of residual soil concentrations at a site exceeds the MOU consultation trigger concentrations. NRC must also consult with EPA if radionuclide concentrations in groundwater exceed | The licensee will need to include discussion in the FSSP confirming that groundwater contamination is not an issue at the site. | ||
Regarding | NRC staff discussed its responsibilities under the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on consultation and finality on decommissioning and decontamination of contaminated sites. Per the MOU, the staff must consult with EPA if the planned level of residual soil concentrations at a site exceeds the MOU consultation trigger concentrations. NRC must also consult with EPA if radionuclide concentrations in groundwater exceed EPAs maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) found in 40 CFR 141. When NRC receives the licensees FSSP, it will compare: (1) the proposed soil clean-up values in the FSSP to the MOU trigger concentrations; and (2) the radionuclide concentrations in groundwater to EPAs MCLs, and consult with EPA if needed per the MOU. | ||
Regarding as low as is reasonably achievable (ALARA) considerations, the licensee does not need to demonstrate ALARA for screening values used for building surfaces or surface soils. | |||
However, the licensee must demonstrate ALARA for instances where site-specific DCGLs are used. | |||
NRC staff also discussed the other areas that the FSSP will need to address, such as: A detailed FSS design; background contributions for all reference areas and materials; adverse surface conditions that may result in underestimating activity by direct measurements; and radionuclide ratios for different areas and materials at the site. | |||
3 | 3 The following action items were identified during the meeting: NRC will provide the licensee with: (1) NRC guidance on radionuclides or exposure pathways that can be considered insignificant and eliminated from further consideration; (2) the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. for NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 4, Comparison of the Models and Assumptions Used in the DandD 1.0, RESRAD 5.61, and RESRAD-Build 1.50 Computer Codes with Respect to the Residential Farmer and Industrial Occupant Scenarios Provided in NUREG/CR-5512; (3) a copy of the DandD software on a CD; (4) an electronic copy of the EPA/NRC MOU; and (5) an approximate estimate of the time it takes from the licensee submittal of the FSS report to license termination. NRC provided these items to the licensee after the meeting. | ||
==Attachment:== | ==Attachment:== | ||
Meeting Attendees | Meeting Attendees | ||
University of Michigan/Office of the Vice President for | MEETING ATTENDEES Date: October 23, 2009 Topic: Meeting with University of Michigan to discuss decommissioning status of Ford Nuclear Reactor NAME AFFILIATION PHONE NUMBER / EMAIL ADDRESS Kristina Banovac NRC/Headquarters 301-415-5114, kristina.banovac@nrc.gov William Snell NRC/Region III 630-829-9871, william.snell@nrc.gov Stephen Giebel NRC/Headquarters 301-415-5526, stephen.giebel@nrc.gov Christine Lipa NRC/Region IIII 630-829-9834, christine.lipa@nrc.gov Mark Banaszak Holl University of Michigan 734-763-1290, mbanasza@umich.edu University of Michigan/ | ||
Robert Blackburn Phoenix Memorial 734-936-1582, rblack@umich.edu Laboratory University of Michigan/ | |||
Terry Alexander Occupational Safety & | |||
734-647-2253, tgalex@umich.edu Environmental Health (OSEH) | |||
Mark Driscoll University of Michigan/OSEH 743-647-2251, drisc@umich.edu Philip Simpson University of Michigan/Ford 734-216-7173, phils@umich.edu Nuclear Reactor James Berger DeNuke Contracting 865-387-1282, jberger@denuke.com Services University of Michigan/Office Curt Smitka of the Vice President for 734-936-2681, cusmitka@umich.edu Research Attachment}} | |||
Latest revision as of 22:26, 6 December 2019
| ML093130526 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | University of Michigan |
| Issue date: | 11/20/2009 |
| From: | Kristina Banovac NRC/FSME/DWMEP/DURLD/RDB |
| To: | Alexander T University of Michigan |
| Kristina Banovac, 415-5114 | |
| References | |
| Download: ML093130526 (7) | |
Text
November 20, 2009 Mr. Terrance G. Alexander, Executive Director Occupational Safety & Environmental Health University of Michigan Campus Safety Services Building 1239 Kipke Drive Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1010
SUBJECT:
REPORT OF OCTOBER 23, 2009, OPEN MEETING WITH UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN TO DISCUSS DECOMMISSIONING STATUS OF FORD NUCLEAR REACTOR
Dear Mr. Alexander:
Enclosed is a report of the October 23, 2009, open meeting between staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and representatives of University of Michigan and DeNuke Services.
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the decommissioning status of the Ford Nuclear Reactor and the University of Michigans upcoming submittal of a Final Status Survey Plan for the Ford Nuclear Reactor.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice for Domestic Licensing Proceedings and Issuance of Orders, a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRCs Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at 301-415-5114 or kristina.banovac@nrc.gov.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Kristina L. Banovac, Project Manager Reactor Decommissioning Branch Decommissioning and Uranium Recovery Licensing Directorate Division of Waste Management and Environmental Protection Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs
Enclosure:
October 23, 2009, Open Meeting Report Docket No.: 50-02 License No.: R-28 cc: University of Michigan - Ford Nuclear Reactor Service List
November 20, 2009 Mr. Terrance G. Alexander, Executive Director Occupational Safety & Environmental Health University of Michigan Campus Safety Services Building 1239 Kipke Drive Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1010
SUBJECT:
REPORT OF OCTOBER 23, 2009, OPEN MEETING WITH UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN TO DISCUSS DECOMMISSIONING STATUS OF FORD NUCLEAR REACTOR
Dear Mr. Alexander:
Enclosed is a report of the October 23, 2009, open meeting between staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and representatives of University of Michigan and DeNuke Services.
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the decommissioning status of the Ford Nuclear Reactor and the University of Michigans upcoming submittal of a Final Status Survey Plan for the Ford Nuclear Reactor.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice for Domestic Licensing Proceedings and Issuance of Orders, a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRCs Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at 301-415-5114 or kristina.banovac@nrc.gov.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Kristina L. Banovac, Project Manager Reactor Decommissioning Branch Decommissioning and Uranium Recovery Licensing Directorate Division of Waste Management and Environmental Protection Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs
Enclosure:
October 23, 2009, Open Meeting Report Docket No.: 50-02 License No.: R-28 cc: University of Michigan - Ford Nuclear Reactor Service List DISTRIBUTION:
DOrlando WSnell JTapp CLipa SGiebel ML093130526 Office DWMEP:PM DWMEP:LA DWMEP:BC DWMEP:PM Name KBanovac SMichonski APersinko KBanovac Date 11/ 13 /09 11/ 13 /09 11/ 19 /09 11/ 20 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
University of Michigan - Ford Nuclear Reactor Service List cc:
Mr. Mark L. Driscoll, Radiation Safety Officer Occupational Safety & Environmental Health University of Michigan Campus Safety Services Building 1239 Kipke Drive Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1010 Dr. Mark M. Banaszak Holl, Ph.D., Associate Vice President Office of Vice President for Research, Natural Science and Engineering Fleming Building / Room 4079 503 Thompson Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1340 Mr. Curt W. Smitka, Director Budget & Administration Office of Vice President for Research Fleming Building / Room 4056 503 Thompson Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1340 Mr. Robert B. Blackburn, Manager Ford Nuclear Reactor - Decommissioning Project Phoenix Memorial Laboratory / Room 3034 2301 Bonisteel Boulevard Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2100 Special Assistant to the Governor Office of the Governor Room 1 - State Capitol Lansing, MI 48909 Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Waste and Hazardous Materials Division Hazardous Waste and Radiological Protection Section Nuclear Facilities Unit, 525 West Allegan Street P.O. Box 30241 Lansing, MI 48909-7741 Test, Research, and Training Reactor Newsletter University of Florida 202 Nuclear Sciences Center Gainesville, FL 32611
OPEN MEETING REPORT Date: October 23, 2009 Time: 2:00 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.
Place: University of Michigan Phoenix Memorial Laboratory 2301 Bonisteel Blvd Room 3028 (3rd floor)
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2100
Purpose:
Meeting with University of Michigan (licensee) to discuss decommissioning status of the Ford Nuclear Reactor and University of Michigans upcoming submittal of a Final Status Survey Plan Attendees: See Attachment Discussion:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Project Manager opened the meeting. The licensee presented the status of decommissioning at the Ford Nuclear Reactor (FNR) site, describing recent work that was completed and the remaining characterization and remediation activities at the site. The licensee has completed most of the remediation activities. It will continue to complete characterization of soils and areas in the reactor building and remediate these areas, as needed. The licensee noted that funding is available for completion of the decommissioning project at FNR.
The licensee expects to submit its Final Status Survey Plan (FSSP) to the NRC for review and approval in January 2010. The licensee will inform the NRC of any schedule changes. The licensee plans to submit one complete FSSP for NRC review, rather than submitting individual portions of it for review. The licensee will submit the FSSP as a license amendment request, requesting approval of the FSSP and incorporation into the decommissioning plan (DP), which was approved on June 26, 2006, via Amendment No. 50 to License No. R-28 for FNR.
The FNR DP was approved with license conditions, which require the licensee to submit reports of all characterization surveys performed that were not part of the DP application. The license conditions also require the licensee to submit a complete FSSP for NRC review and approval, prior to performing the final status survey (FSS). The FSSP will need to address areas and topics that were not completely described in the DP and provide information and details regarding proposed clean-up levels and the proposed FSS of the site. NRC and licensee staff discussed the open items in the FNR DP that will need to be addressed in the upcoming FSSP.
Enclosure
2 Regarding the licensees proposed use of screening values, the licensee will need to demonstrate in the FSSP that the particular site conditions (e.g., physical and source term conditions) are compatible and consistent with the DandD model code assumptions and default parameters. The licensee may use the RESRAD model code to calculate derived concentration guideline levels (DCGLs) for any radionuclides of concern that are not included in NRCs list of screening values or are not included in the DandD code. NRC staff also noted that the licensee needs to discuss the reasonably foreseeable land use for the site in the FSSP, as the DP does not address this.
The licensee will need to calculate DCGLs for any volumetrically contaminated surfaces, embedded pipes, or contaminated subsurface soils. The licensee noted that it has bored most of the embedded pipe out of concrete walls and floors and plans to remove the remainder of the embedded pipe.
The licensee will also need to discuss subsurface soils and groundwater in the FSSP. The licensee will provide the characterization results from the reactor pool and any leakage pathways, such as cracks in the foundation under the pool. The licensee will also submit characterization data for the concrete floor beneath the reactor core and a demonstration that neutron activation of the soil beneath the reactor pool did not occur. The licensee will also need to provide all groundwater sampling and characterization data that was not included in the DP.
The licensee will need to include discussion in the FSSP confirming that groundwater contamination is not an issue at the site.
NRC staff discussed its responsibilities under the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on consultation and finality on decommissioning and decontamination of contaminated sites. Per the MOU, the staff must consult with EPA if the planned level of residual soil concentrations at a site exceeds the MOU consultation trigger concentrations. NRC must also consult with EPA if radionuclide concentrations in groundwater exceed EPAs maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) found in 40 CFR 141. When NRC receives the licensees FSSP, it will compare: (1) the proposed soil clean-up values in the FSSP to the MOU trigger concentrations; and (2) the radionuclide concentrations in groundwater to EPAs MCLs, and consult with EPA if needed per the MOU.
Regarding as low as is reasonably achievable (ALARA) considerations, the licensee does not need to demonstrate ALARA for screening values used for building surfaces or surface soils.
However, the licensee must demonstrate ALARA for instances where site-specific DCGLs are used.
NRC staff also discussed the other areas that the FSSP will need to address, such as: A detailed FSS design; background contributions for all reference areas and materials; adverse surface conditions that may result in underestimating activity by direct measurements; and radionuclide ratios for different areas and materials at the site.
3 The following action items were identified during the meeting: NRC will provide the licensee with: (1) NRC guidance on radionuclides or exposure pathways that can be considered insignificant and eliminated from further consideration; (2) the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. for NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 4, Comparison of the Models and Assumptions Used in the DandD 1.0, RESRAD 5.61, and RESRAD-Build 1.50 Computer Codes with Respect to the Residential Farmer and Industrial Occupant Scenarios Provided in NUREG/CR-5512; (3) a copy of the DandD software on a CD; (4) an electronic copy of the EPA/NRC MOU; and (5) an approximate estimate of the time it takes from the licensee submittal of the FSS report to license termination. NRC provided these items to the licensee after the meeting.
Attachment:
Meeting Attendees
MEETING ATTENDEES Date: October 23, 2009 Topic: Meeting with University of Michigan to discuss decommissioning status of Ford Nuclear Reactor NAME AFFILIATION PHONE NUMBER / EMAIL ADDRESS Kristina Banovac NRC/Headquarters 301-415-5114, kristina.banovac@nrc.gov William Snell NRC/Region III 630-829-9871, william.snell@nrc.gov Stephen Giebel NRC/Headquarters 301-415-5526, stephen.giebel@nrc.gov Christine Lipa NRC/Region IIII 630-829-9834, christine.lipa@nrc.gov Mark Banaszak Holl University of Michigan 734-763-1290, mbanasza@umich.edu University of Michigan/
Robert Blackburn Phoenix Memorial 734-936-1582, rblack@umich.edu Laboratory University of Michigan/
Terry Alexander Occupational Safety &
734-647-2253, tgalex@umich.edu Environmental Health (OSEH)
Mark Driscoll University of Michigan/OSEH 743-647-2251, drisc@umich.edu Philip Simpson University of Michigan/Ford 734-216-7173, phils@umich.edu Nuclear Reactor James Berger DeNuke Contracting 865-387-1282, jberger@denuke.com Services University of Michigan/Office Curt Smitka of the Vice President for 734-936-2681, cusmitka@umich.edu Research Attachment