ML092010070: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML092010070
| number = ML092010070
| issue date = 01/12/2009
| issue date = 01/12/2009
| title = E-mail from M. Modes of Usnrc to J. Richmond of Usnrc, Regarding Ut. Draft Write-up for Oc
| title = E-mail from M. Modes of USNRC to J. Richmond of USNRC, Regarding Ut. Draft Write-up for Oc
| author name = Modes M C
| author name = Modes M
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS/EB1
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS/EB1
| addressee name = Richmond J E
| addressee name = Richmond J
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS/EB1
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS/EB1
| docket = 05000219
| docket = 05000219
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ýONS Nathan Lafferty From: Michael Modes Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 2:08 PM To: John Richmond  
{{#Wiki_filter:ýONS Nathan Lafferty From:                           Michael Modes Sent:                             Monday, January 12, 2009 2:08 PM To:                             John Richmond


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RE: UT Draft Write-up for OC Yes that is ok.No we do not have to explain in more detail.From: John Richmond Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 2:07 PM To: Michael Modes  
RE: UT Draft Write-up for OC Yes that is ok.
No we do not have to explain in more detail.
From: John Richmond Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 2:07 PM To: Michael Modes


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
UT Draft Write-up for OC Michael, Is this ok, or do we need to explain in more detail?L (b)(5)From: Michael Modes Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 10:26 AM To: John Richmond  
UT Draft Write-up for OC Michael, Is this ok, or do we need to explain in more detail?
L                                                             (b)(5)
From: Michael Modes Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 10:26 AM To: John Richmond


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RE: Reason For Fiberglass in the Containment Annulus at Oyster Creek I was really close to establishing the Part 50 documented basis for the drywell examinations, the ACRS and hearing files contain all the relevant historical documents.
RE: Reason For Fiberglass in the Containment Annulus at Oyster Creek I was really close to establishing the Part 50 documented basis for the drywell examinations, the ACRS and hearing files contain all the relevant historical documents. We went into a great deal of hjstorical detail on the very same subject when 1-hey dumped the iolv bottle- ... did they violate a Part 50 recuirmentL                     (b)(5)
We went into a great deal of hjstorical detail on the very same subject when 1-hey dumped the iolv bottle- ... did they violate a Part 50 recuirmentL (b)(5)L__ (b)(5)I am directed to focus on my feeders.Therefore: (b)(5)I will now move on to the other two feeders: Bellows, and Fatigue.From: John Richmond Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 9:56 AM To: Michael Modes; Harold Gray  
(b)(5)
L__
I am directed to focus on my feeders.
Therefore:
(b)(5)
I will now move on to the other two feeders: Bellows, and Fatigue.
From: John Richmond Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 9:56 AM To: Michael Modes; Harold Gray


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RE: Reason For Fiberglass in the Containment Annulus at Oyster Creek I continue to learn! thanks for the update.From: Michael Modes Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 9:12 AM To: Harold Gray&*xan In INS wec was deleted i oe lon withl the Freedom of Informatdon Act 1 i+APA *_m -
RE: Reason For Fiberglass in the Containment Annulus at Oyster Creek I continue to learn! thanks for the update.
Cc: John Richmond  
From: Michael Modes Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 9:12 AM To: Harold Gray
&*xan InINS wec was deleted i oe       withlthe Freedom of Informatdon Act lon                                                        1 i+APA *_m             -
 
Cc: John Richmond


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Reason For Fiberglass in the Containment Annulus at Oyster Creek Follow up to our recent conversation.
Reason For Fiberglass in the Containment Annulus at Oyster Creek Follow up to our recent conversation.
This is from an '87 calculation performed to determine drywell integrity.
This is from an '87 calculation performed to determine drywell integrity. I found it while researching an unresolved item proposed by John Richmond and Rich Conte.
I found it while researching an unresolved item proposed by John Richmond and Rich Conte."A two-inch gap was formed with fiberglass between elevations 12' 3" and 23' 6". Above 23' 6" a three-inch gap was formed with Fire-D. The gap depths were established by design to permit unimpeded expansion of the drywell shell during any design condftion.
"A two-inch gap was formed with fiberglass between elevations 12' 3" and 23' 6". Above 23' 6" a three-inch gap was formed with Fire-D. The gap depths were established by design to permit unimpeded expansion of the drywell shell during any design condftion. The materials were selected to resist crushing by the concrete during pouring but allowing crushing by induced vessel expansion."
The materials were selected to resist crushing by the concrete during pouring but allowing crushing by induced vessel expansion." 2 Received:
2
from R1CLSTRO1 .nrc.gov ([148.184.99.7])
 
by R1 MS01 .nrc.gov ([148.184.99.10])
Received: from R1CLSTRO1 .nrc.gov ([148.184.99.7]) by R1 MS01 .nrc.gov
with mapi; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:08:09 -0500 Content-Type:
([148.184.99.10]) with mapi; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:08:09 -0500 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary From: Michael Modes <MichaeI.Modes@nrc.gov>
application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding:
binary From: Michael Modes <MichaeI.Modes@nrc.gov>
To: John Richmond <John.Richmond@nrc.gov>
To: John Richmond <John.Richmond@nrc.gov>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:07:32 -0500  
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:07:32 -0500


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RE: UT Draft Write-up for OC Thread-Topic:
RE: UT Draft Write-up for OC Thread-Topic: UT Draft Write-up for OC Thread-Index: AQHJdL+v/xQVf76p8Oa/ALOcnusOXY9WojOAgAAE2w2AAEBMsIAAATE8 Message-ID: <2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA60EF77A3@R1CLSTR01 .nrc.gov>
UT Draft Write-up for OC Thread-Index:
AQHJdL+v/xQVf76p8Oa/ALOcnusOXY9WojOAgAAE2w2AAEBMsIAAATE8 Message-ID:  
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA60EF77A3@R1CLSTR01 .nrc.gov>


==References:==
==References:==


<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA60EF779F@R1 CLSTRO1 .nrc.gov>,<2856BC46F 6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA612C01 3A@R1 CLSTRO1.nrc.gov>
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA60EF779F@R1 CLSTRO1 .nrc.gov>,<2856BC46F 6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA612C01 3A@R1 CLSTRO1.nrc.gov>
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA60EF77A1  
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA60EF77A1 @R1 CLSTRO1 .nrc.gov>,<2856BC46 F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA612C0475@R1 CLSTRO1.nrc.gov>
@R1 CLSTRO1 .nrc.gov>,<2856BC46 F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA612C0475@R1 CLSTRO1.nrc.gov>
In-Reply-To: <2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA612C0475@R1CLSTRO1.nrc.gov>
In-Reply-To:  
Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach:
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA612C0475@R1CLSTRO1.nrc.gov>
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1 X-MS-TN EF-Correlator:
Accept-Language:
<2856BC46F6A308418 F033D973BBOEE72AA60EF77A3@R1 CLSTR01. nrc.gov>
en-US Content-Language:
MIME-Version: 1.0}}
en-US X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL:  
-1 X-MS-TN EF-Correlator:
<2856BC46F6A308418 F033D973BBOEE72AA60EF77A3@R1 CLSTR01. nrc.gov>MIME-Version:
1.0}}

Latest revision as of 04:05, 14 November 2019

E-mail from M. Modes of USNRC to J. Richmond of USNRC, Regarding Ut. Draft Write-up for Oc
ML092010070
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 01/12/2009
From: Modes M
Engineering Region 1 Branch 1
To: Richmond J
Engineering Region 1 Branch 1
References
FOIA/PA-2009-0070
Download: ML092010070 (3)


Text

ýONS Nathan Lafferty From: Michael Modes Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 2:08 PM To: John Richmond

Subject:

RE: UT Draft Write-up for OC Yes that is ok.

No we do not have to explain in more detail.

From: John Richmond Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 2:07 PM To: Michael Modes

Subject:

UT Draft Write-up for OC Michael, Is this ok, or do we need to explain in more detail?

L (b)(5)

From: Michael Modes Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 10:26 AM To: John Richmond

Subject:

RE: Reason For Fiberglass in the Containment Annulus at Oyster Creek I was really close to establishing the Part 50 documented basis for the drywell examinations, the ACRS and hearing files contain all the relevant historical documents. We went into a great deal of hjstorical detail on the very same subject when 1-hey dumped the iolv bottle- ... did they violate a Part 50 recuirmentL (b)(5)

(b)(5)

L__

I am directed to focus on my feeders.

Therefore:

(b)(5)

I will now move on to the other two feeders: Bellows, and Fatigue.

From: John Richmond Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 9:56 AM To: Michael Modes; Harold Gray

Subject:

RE: Reason For Fiberglass in the Containment Annulus at Oyster Creek I continue to learn! thanks for the update.

From: Michael Modes Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 9:12 AM To: Harold Gray

&*xan InINS wec was deleted i oe withlthe Freedom of Informatdon Act lon 1 i+APA *_m -

Cc: John Richmond

Subject:

Reason For Fiberglass in the Containment Annulus at Oyster Creek Follow up to our recent conversation.

This is from an '87 calculation performed to determine drywell integrity. I found it while researching an unresolved item proposed by John Richmond and Rich Conte.

"A two-inch gap was formed with fiberglass between elevations 12' 3" and 23' 6". Above 23' 6" a three-inch gap was formed with Fire-D. The gap depths were established by design to permit unimpeded expansion of the drywell shell during any design condftion. The materials were selected to resist crushing by the concrete during pouring but allowing crushing by induced vessel expansion."

2

Received: from R1CLSTRO1 .nrc.gov ([148.184.99.7]) by R1 MS01 .nrc.gov

([148.184.99.10]) with mapi; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:08:09 -0500 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary From: Michael Modes <MichaeI.Modes@nrc.gov>

To: John Richmond <John.Richmond@nrc.gov>

Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:07:32 -0500

Subject:

RE: UT Draft Write-up for OC Thread-Topic: UT Draft Write-up for OC Thread-Index: AQHJdL+v/xQVf76p8Oa/ALOcnusOXY9WojOAgAAE2w2AAEBMsIAAATE8 Message-ID: <2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA60EF77A3@R1CLSTR01 .nrc.gov>

References:

<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA60EF779F@R1 CLSTRO1 .nrc.gov>,<2856BC46F 6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA612C01 3A@R1 CLSTRO1.nrc.gov>

<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA60EF77A1 @R1 CLSTRO1 .nrc.gov>,<2856BC46 F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA612C0475@R1 CLSTRO1.nrc.gov>

In-Reply-To: <2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA612C0475@R1CLSTRO1.nrc.gov>

Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach:

X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1 X-MS-TN EF-Correlator:

<2856BC46F6A308418 F033D973BBOEE72AA60EF77A3@R1 CLSTR01. nrc.gov>

MIME-Version: 1.0