IR 05000259/2011301: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257 April 4, 2011
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES ril 4, 2011


Mr. R. Vice President, Nuclear Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street, LP 3R-C Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
==SUBJECT:==
 
BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT- NRC OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REPORT 05000259/2011301, 05000260/2011301, AND 05000296/2011301
SUBJECT: BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT- NRC OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REPORT 05000259/2011301, 05000260/2011301, AND 05000296/2011301


==Dear Mr. Krich:==
==Dear Mr. Krich:==
During the period February 7-16, 2011, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) administered operating tests to employees of your company who had applied for licenses to operate the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant. At the conclusion of the tests, the examiners discussed preliminary findings related to the operating tests and the written examination submittal with those members of your staff identified in the enclosed report. The written examination was administered by your staff on February 18, 2011.
During the period February 7-16, 2011, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
administered operating tests to employees of your company who had applied for licenses to operate the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant. At the conclusion of the tests, the examiners discussed preliminary findings related to the operating tests and the written examination submittal with those members of your staff identified in the enclosed report. The written examination was administered by your staff on February 18, 2011.


Six Reactor Operator (RO) and Six Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) applicants passed both the operating test and written examination. One RO applicant passed the operating test but failed the written examination. There were no post-examination comments. A Simulator Fidelity Report is included in this report as Enclosure 2.
Six Reactor Operator (RO) and Six Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) applicants passed both the operating test and written examination. One RO applicant passed the operating test but failed the written examination. There were no post-examination comments. A Simulator Fidelity Report is included in this report as Enclosure 2.
Line 35: Line 35:
Sincerely,
Sincerely,
/RA/
/RA/
Malcolm T. Widmann, Chief Operations Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos.: 50-259, 50-260, 50-296 License Nos.: DPR-33, DPR-52, DPR-68  
Malcolm T. Widmann, Chief Operations Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos.: 50-259, 50-260, 50-296 License Nos.: DPR-33, DPR-52, DPR-68


===Enclosures:===
===Enclosures:===
Line 41: Line 41:


REGION II==
REGION II==
Docket Nos.: 50-259, 50-260, and 50-296 License Nos.: DPR-33, DPR-52, and DPR-68 Report Nos.: 05000259/2011301, 05000260/2011301, and 05000296/2011301 Licensee: Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), LLC Facility: Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3 Location: Athens AL, 35611 Dates: Operating Tests - February 7-16, 2011 Written Examination - February 18, 2011 Examiners: R. Aiello, Chief, Senior Operations Engineer, RII/DRS/OLB J. Munro, Senior Reactor Operations Engineer, NRR/IOLB G. Johnson, Operations Engineer, RII/DRS/OLB Approved by: Malcolm T. Widmann, Chief Operations Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure 1


Docket Nos.: 50-259, 50-260, and 50-296 License Nos.: DPR-33, DPR-52, and DPR-68
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ER 05000259/2011301, 05000260/2011301, and 05000296/2011301; 02/07/2011 - 02/16/2011; Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3 Operator License Examinations.


Report Nos.: 05000259/2011301, 05000260/2011301, and 05000296/2011301 Licensee: Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), LLC Facility: Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3 Location: Athens AL, 35611 Dates: Operating Tests - February 7-16, 2011 Written Examination - February 18, 2011
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) examiners conducted an initial examination in accordance with the guidelines in Revision 9, Supplement 1, of NUREG-1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors. This examination implemented the operator licensing requirements identified in 10 CFR §55.41, §55.43, and §55.45, as applicable.


Examiners: R. Aiello, Chief, Senior Operations Engineer, RII/DRS/OLB J. Munro, Senior Reactor Operations Engineer, NRR/IOLB G. Johnson, Operations Engineer, RII/DRS/OLB
Members of the Browns Ferry Nuclear Station staff developed both the operating tests and the written examination.


Approved by: Malcolm T. Widmann, Chief Operations Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure 1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ER 05000259/2011301, 05000260/2011301, and 05000296/2011301; 02/07/2011 - 02/16/2011; Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3 Operator License Examinations.
The NRC administered the operating tests during the period of February 7-16, 2011. Members of the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant training staff administered the written examination on February 18, 2011. Six Reactor Operator (RO) and Six Senior Reactor Operator (SRO)
applicants passed both the written examination and operating test. One RO applicant passed the operating test but failed the written examination. Twelve applicants were issued licenses commensurate with the level of examination administered.


Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) examiners conducted an initial examination in accordance with the guidelines in Revision 9, Supplement 1, of NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors." This examination implemented the operator licensing requirements identified in 10 CFR §55.41, §55.43, and §55.45, as applicable.
There were no post examination comments.


Members of the Browns Ferry Nuclear Station staff developed both the operating tests and the written examination.
No findings of significance were identified.


The NRC administered the operating tests during the period of February 7-16, 2011. Members of the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant training staff administered the written examination on February 18, 2011. Six Reactor Operator (RO) and Six Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) applicants passed both the written examination and operating test. One RO applicant passed the operating test but failed the written examination. Twelve applicants were issued licenses commensurate with the level of examination administered.
Enclosure 1


There were no post examination comments.
Report Details 4. OTHER ACTIVITIES 4OA2 Problem Identification and Resolution Annual Sample Review a. Inspection Scope The inspectors selected Problem Evaluation Report (PER) 324228 for a detailed review.


No findings of significance were identified.
The PER was initiated because the inspector identified several procedure issues during NRC Exam 2011-301 that lacked clear procedure guidance thus making them difficult to follow. The facility has committed to reviewing their current practices and procedures to better clarify or specify the applicable procedures in question. These procedures need to be strengthened to ensure that the actions operators take are clear and easy to follow.


Enclosure 1 Report Details 4. OTHER ACTIVITIES 4OA2 Problem Identification and Resolution Annual Sample Review a. Inspection Scope The inspectors selected Problem Evaluation Report (PER) 324228 for a detailed review. The PER was initiated because the inspector identified several procedure issues during NRC Exam 2011-301 that lacked clear procedure guidance thus making them difficult to follow. The facility has committed to reviewing their current practices and procedures to better clarify or specify the applicable procedures in question. These procedures need to be strengthened to ensure that the actions operators take are clear and easy to follow. The inspectors checked that this issue had been completely and accurately identified in the licensee's Corrective Action Program (CAP) and properly classified and prioritized for resolution. Corrective actions have not been verified complete.
The inspectors checked that this issue had been completely and accurately identified in the licensees Corrective Action Program (CAP) and properly classified and prioritized for resolution. Corrective actions have not been verified complete.


b. Findings No findings of significance were identified.
b. Findings No findings of significance were identified.
Line 66: Line 68:
4OA5 Operator Licensing Initial Examinations a. Inspection Scope Members of the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant staff developed both the operating tests and the written examination. All examination material was developed in accordance with the guidelines contained in Revision 9, Supplement 1, of NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors." The NRC examination team reviewed the proposed examination. Examination changes agreed upon between the NRC and the licensee were made per NUREG-1021 and incorporated into the final version of the examination materials.
4OA5 Operator Licensing Initial Examinations a. Inspection Scope Members of the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant staff developed both the operating tests and the written examination. All examination material was developed in accordance with the guidelines contained in Revision 9, Supplement 1, of NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors." The NRC examination team reviewed the proposed examination. Examination changes agreed upon between the NRC and the licensee were made per NUREG-1021 and incorporated into the final version of the examination materials.


The NRC reviewed the licensee's examination security measures while preparing and administering the examinations in order to ensure compliance with 10 CFR §55.49, "Integrity of examinations and tests."
The NRC reviewed the licensees examination security measures while preparing and administering the examinations in order to ensure compliance with 10 CFR §55.49, Integrity of examinations and tests.
 
The NRC examiners evaluated Seven Reactor Operator (RO) and Six Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) applicants using the guidelines contained in NUREG-1021. The examiners administered the operating tests during the period of February 7-16, 2011.
 
Members of the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant training staff administered the written examination on February 18, 2011. Evaluations of applicants and reviews of associated documentation were performed to determine if the applicants, who applied for licenses to operate the Browns Ferry Nuclear Station, met the requirements specified in 10 CFR Part 55, Operators Licenses.
 
Enclosure 1


The NRC examiners evaluated Seven Reactor Operator (RO) and Six Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) applicants using the guidelines contained in NUREG-1021. The examiners administered the operating tests during the period of February 7-16, 2011. Members of the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant training staff administered the written examination on February 18, 2011. Evaluations of applicants and reviews of associated documentation were performed to determine if the applicants, who applied for licenses to operate the Browns Ferry Nuclear Station, met the requirements specified in 10 CFR Part 55, "Operators' Licenses."
b. Findings No findings of significance were identified. The NRC determined, using NUREG-1021 that the licensees examination submittal was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.


4 Enclosure 1 b. Findings No findings of significance were identified. The NRC determined, using NUREG-1021 that the licensee's examination submittal was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.
Six SRO and six RO applicants passed both the written examination and operating test.


Six SRO and six RO applicants passed both the written examination and operating test. One RO applicant passed the operating test but failed the written examination. Twelve applicants were issued licenses commensurate with the level of examination administered.
One RO applicant passed the operating test but failed the written examination. Twelve applicants were issued licenses commensurate with the level of examination administered.


Copies of all individual examination reports were sent to the facility Training Manager for evaluation of weaknesses and determination of appropriate remedial training.
Copies of all individual examination reports were sent to the facility Training Manager for evaluation of weaknesses and determination of appropriate remedial training.
Line 80: Line 88:
4OA6 Meetings Exit Meeting Summary On February 16, 2011, the NRC examination team discussed generic issues associated with the operating test with Mr. Jay Miller, Operations Manager, and members of his staff. The examiners asked the licensee if any of the examination material was proprietary. No proprietary information was identified.
4OA6 Meetings Exit Meeting Summary On February 16, 2011, the NRC examination team discussed generic issues associated with the operating test with Mr. Jay Miller, Operations Manager, and members of his staff. The examiners asked the licensee if any of the examination material was proprietary. No proprietary information was identified.


PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED Licensee personnel J. Davenport, Regulatory Compliance J. Emens, Licensing Manager C. Gannon, Plant Manager M. Gibson, Operations Training D. Malinowski, Operations Training Manager J. Miller, Operations Manager J. Morris, Training Manager M. Nash, Operations Shift Manager J. Ruby Operations Training L. Miller, Operations Training D. Zielinski, Operations Training  
PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED Licensee personnel J. Davenport, Regulatory Compliance J. Emens, Licensing Manager C. Gannon, Plant Manager M. Gibson, Operations Training D. Malinowski, Operations Training Manager J. Miller, Operations Manager J. Morris, Training Manager M. Nash, Operations Shift Manager J. Ruby Operations Training L. Miller, Operations Training D. Zielinski, Operations Training NRC personnel T. Ross, Senior Resident Inspector C. Stancil, Resident Inspector Enclosure 1


NRC personnel T. Ross, Senior Resident Inspector C. Stancil, Resident Inspector Enclosure 2 SIMULATOR FIDELITY REPORT
SIMULATOR FIDELITY REPORT Facility Licensee: Browns Ferry Nuclear Station Facility Docket Nos.: 05000259/2011301, 05000260/2011301, and 05000296/2011301 Operating Test Administered: February 7-16, 2011 This form is to be used only to report observations. These observations do not constitute audit or inspection findings and, without further verification and review in accordance with Inspection Procedure 71111.11 are not indicative of noncompliance with 10 CFR 55.46. No licensee action is required in response to these observations.


Facility Licensee: Browns Ferry Nuclear Station
While conducting the simulator portion of the operating test, examiners observed no simulator fidelity or configuration issues.


Facility Docket Nos.: 05000259/2011301, 05000260/2011301, and 05000296/2011301 Operating Test Administered: February 7-16, 2011
Enclosure 2
 
This form is to be used only to report observations. These observations do not constitute audit or inspection findings and, without further verification and review in accordance with Inspection Procedure 71111.11 are not indicative of noncompliance with 10 CFR 55.46. No licensee action is required in response to these observations.
 
While conducting the simulator portion of the operating test, examiners observed no simulator fidelity or configuration issues.
}}
}}

Revision as of 01:18, 13 November 2019

Er 05000259-11-301, 05000260-11-301, and 05000296-11-301; 02/07/2011 - 02/16/2011; Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3 Operator License Examinations
ML110940423
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 04/04/2011
From: Widmann M
Division of Reactor Safety II
To: Krich R
Tennessee Valley Authority
References
50-259/11-301, 50-260/11-301, 50-296/11-301
Download: ML110940423 (9)


Text

UNITED STATES ril 4, 2011

SUBJECT:

BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT- NRC OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REPORT 05000259/2011301, 05000260/2011301, AND 05000296/2011301

Dear Mr. Krich:

During the period February 7-16, 2011, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

administered operating tests to employees of your company who had applied for licenses to operate the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant. At the conclusion of the tests, the examiners discussed preliminary findings related to the operating tests and the written examination submittal with those members of your staff identified in the enclosed report. The written examination was administered by your staff on February 18, 2011.

Six Reactor Operator (RO) and Six Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) applicants passed both the operating test and written examination. One RO applicant passed the operating test but failed the written examination. There were no post-examination comments. A Simulator Fidelity Report is included in this report as Enclosure 2.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact me at (404) 997-4550.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Malcolm T. Widmann, Chief Operations Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos.: 50-259, 50-260, 50-296 License Nos.: DPR-33, DPR-52, DPR-68

Enclosures:

1. Report Details 2. Simulator Fidelity Report (

REGION II==

Docket Nos.: 50-259, 50-260, and 50-296 License Nos.: DPR-33, DPR-52, and DPR-68 Report Nos.: 05000259/2011301, 05000260/2011301, and 05000296/2011301 Licensee: Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), LLC Facility: Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3 Location: Athens AL, 35611 Dates: Operating Tests - February 7-16, 2011 Written Examination - February 18, 2011 Examiners: R. Aiello, Chief, Senior Operations Engineer, RII/DRS/OLB J. Munro, Senior Reactor Operations Engineer, NRR/IOLB G. Johnson, Operations Engineer, RII/DRS/OLB Approved by: Malcolm T. Widmann, Chief Operations Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure 1

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ER 05000259/2011301, 05000260/2011301, and 05000296/2011301; 02/07/2011 - 02/16/2011; Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3 Operator License Examinations.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) examiners conducted an initial examination in accordance with the guidelines in Revision 9, Supplement 1, of NUREG-1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors. This examination implemented the operator licensing requirements identified in 10 CFR §55.41, §55.43, and §55.45, as applicable.

Members of the Browns Ferry Nuclear Station staff developed both the operating tests and the written examination.

The NRC administered the operating tests during the period of February 7-16, 2011. Members of the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant training staff administered the written examination on February 18, 2011. Six Reactor Operator (RO) and Six Senior Reactor Operator (SRO)

applicants passed both the written examination and operating test. One RO applicant passed the operating test but failed the written examination. Twelve applicants were issued licenses commensurate with the level of examination administered.

There were no post examination comments.

No findings of significance were identified.

Enclosure 1

Report Details 4. OTHER ACTIVITIES 4OA2 Problem Identification and Resolution Annual Sample Review a. Inspection Scope The inspectors selected Problem Evaluation Report (PER) 324228 for a detailed review.

The PER was initiated because the inspector identified several procedure issues during NRC Exam 2011-301 that lacked clear procedure guidance thus making them difficult to follow. The facility has committed to reviewing their current practices and procedures to better clarify or specify the applicable procedures in question. These procedures need to be strengthened to ensure that the actions operators take are clear and easy to follow.

The inspectors checked that this issue had been completely and accurately identified in the licensees Corrective Action Program (CAP) and properly classified and prioritized for resolution. Corrective actions have not been verified complete.

b. Findings No findings of significance were identified.

4OA5 Operator Licensing Initial Examinations a. Inspection Scope Members of the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant staff developed both the operating tests and the written examination. All examination material was developed in accordance with the guidelines contained in Revision 9, Supplement 1, of NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors." The NRC examination team reviewed the proposed examination. Examination changes agreed upon between the NRC and the licensee were made per NUREG-1021 and incorporated into the final version of the examination materials.

The NRC reviewed the licensees examination security measures while preparing and administering the examinations in order to ensure compliance with 10 CFR §55.49, Integrity of examinations and tests.

The NRC examiners evaluated Seven Reactor Operator (RO) and Six Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) applicants using the guidelines contained in NUREG-1021. The examiners administered the operating tests during the period of February 7-16, 2011.

Members of the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant training staff administered the written examination on February 18, 2011. Evaluations of applicants and reviews of associated documentation were performed to determine if the applicants, who applied for licenses to operate the Browns Ferry Nuclear Station, met the requirements specified in 10 CFR Part 55, Operators Licenses.

Enclosure 1

b. Findings No findings of significance were identified. The NRC determined, using NUREG-1021 that the licensees examination submittal was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.

Six SRO and six RO applicants passed both the written examination and operating test.

One RO applicant passed the operating test but failed the written examination. Twelve applicants were issued licenses commensurate with the level of examination administered.

Copies of all individual examination reports were sent to the facility Training Manager for evaluation of weaknesses and determination of appropriate remedial training.

There were no post-examination comments. A copy of the final written examination, answer key, and references with all changes incorporated, may be accessed not earlier than February 28, 2013, in the ADAMS system (ADAMS Accession Numbers ML110760682 and ML110760683).

4OA6 Meetings Exit Meeting Summary On February 16, 2011, the NRC examination team discussed generic issues associated with the operating test with Mr. Jay Miller, Operations Manager, and members of his staff. The examiners asked the licensee if any of the examination material was proprietary. No proprietary information was identified.

PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED Licensee personnel J. Davenport, Regulatory Compliance J. Emens, Licensing Manager C. Gannon, Plant Manager M. Gibson, Operations Training D. Malinowski, Operations Training Manager J. Miller, Operations Manager J. Morris, Training Manager M. Nash, Operations Shift Manager J. Ruby Operations Training L. Miller, Operations Training D. Zielinski, Operations Training NRC personnel T. Ross, Senior Resident Inspector C. Stancil, Resident Inspector Enclosure 1

SIMULATOR FIDELITY REPORT Facility Licensee: Browns Ferry Nuclear Station Facility Docket Nos.: 05000259/2011301, 05000260/2011301, and 05000296/2011301 Operating Test Administered: February 7-16, 2011 This form is to be used only to report observations. These observations do not constitute audit or inspection findings and, without further verification and review in accordance with Inspection Procedure 71111.11 are not indicative of noncompliance with 10 CFR 55.46. No licensee action is required in response to these observations.

While conducting the simulator portion of the operating test, examiners observed no simulator fidelity or configuration issues.

Enclosure 2