ML18023A047: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:hIgh'-='F''', 0 0//c~(~~@a Federal Emergency Management Agency,";'Washington, D.C.20472 klg f 3 8 f-'.pa~sg (1 Mr.William J.Dircks Executive Director for Operations U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555  
{{#Wiki_filter://c~(~~@ a hIgh'-='F''',                                                                   '
Federal Emergency Management Agency,";
Washington, D.C. 20472 0    0 klg   f 3 8                             f-'.pa~
sg (1 Mr. William         J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555


==Dear Mr.Dircks:==
==Dear Mr.     Dircks:==
In accordance with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)rule 44 CFR 350, the State of Minnesota submitted its State and associated local plans for radiological emergencies related to the LaCrosse Nuclear Power Plant to the Regional Director of FEMA Region V for FEMA review and approval.The Regional Director forwarded his evaluation of the Minnesota State and local plans to me on March 14, 1985, in accordance with section 350.11 of the rule.His submission included an evaluation of the exercises conducted on October 21, 1981, August 3, 1982, and June 19, 1984, and a report of the public meeting held on October 22, 1981, which explained the site-specific aspects of the State and local plans.Based on an overall evaluation, I find and determine that the State and local plans and preparedness for the LaCrosse Nuclear Power Plant are adequate to protect the health and safety of the public in that there is reasonable assur ance that the appropriate protective measures can be taken offsite in the event of a radiological emergency.
 
However, while there is a public alerting and notification (AAN)system in place and operational, this approval is conditional on FEMA's verification of the A8N system in accordance with the joint Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)/FEMA criteria in NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-l, Rev.1, Appendix 3 and FEMA-43,"Standard Guide for the Evaluation of Alert and Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants".Sincerely, Samuel W.Speck Associate Director State and Local Programs and Support t~}}
In accordance with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) rule 44 CFR 350, the State of Minnesota submitted its State and associated         local plans for radiological emergencies related to the LaCrosse Nuclear Power Plant to the Regional Director of FEMA Region V for FEMA review and approval.
The Regional Director forwarded his evaluation of the Minnesota State and local plans to me on March 14, 1985, in accordance with section 350.11 of the rule. His submission included an evaluation of the exercises conducted on October 21, 1981, August 3, 1982, and June 19, 1984, and a report of the public meeting held on October 22, 1981, which explained the site-specific aspects of the State and local plans.
Based on an         overall evaluation, I find and determine that the State and local plans and preparedness for the LaCrosse Nuclear Power Plant are adequate to protect the health and safety of the public in that there is reasonable assur ance that the appropriate protective measures can be taken offsite in the event of a radiological emergency. However, while there is a public alerting and notification (AAN) system in place and operational, this approval is conditional on FEMA's verification of the A8N system in accordance with the joint Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)/FEMA criteria in NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-l, Rev. 1, Appendix 3 and FEMA-43, "Standard Guide for the Evaluation of Alert and Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants".
Sincerely, Samuel W. Speck Associate Director State and Local Programs and Support
 
t~}}

Latest revision as of 02:30, 22 October 2019

Notifies That State of Mn & Local Emergency Plans Adequate. FEMA Verification of Public Alerting & Notification Sys Conditional on FEMA Verification of Sys Per NUREG-0654/ FEMA-REP-1,Rev 1,App 3 & FEMA-43
ML18023A047
Person / Time
Site: La Crosse File:Dairyland Power Cooperative icon.png
Issue date: 08/13/1985
From: Speck S
Federal Emergency Management Agency
To: Dircks W
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
References
RTR-NUREG-0654, RTR-NUREG-654 NUDOCS 8508230032
Download: ML18023A047 (2)
v • d • e


Text

//c~(~~@ a hIgh'-='F, '

Federal Emergency Management Agency,";

Washington, D.C. 20472 0 0 klg f 3 8 f-'.pa~

sg (1 Mr. William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Mr. Dircks:

In accordance with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) rule 44 CFR 350, the State of Minnesota submitted its State and associated local plans for radiological emergencies related to the LaCrosse Nuclear Power Plant to the Regional Director of FEMA Region V for FEMA review and approval.

The Regional Director forwarded his evaluation of the Minnesota State and local plans to me on March 14, 1985, in accordance with section 350.11 of the rule. His submission included an evaluation of the exercises conducted on October 21, 1981, August 3, 1982, and June 19, 1984, and a report of the public meeting held on October 22, 1981, which explained the site-specific aspects of the State and local plans.

Based on an overall evaluation, I find and determine that the State and local plans and preparedness for the LaCrosse Nuclear Power Plant are adequate to protect the health and safety of the public in that there is reasonable assur ance that the appropriate protective measures can be taken offsite in the event of a radiological emergency. However, while there is a public alerting and notification (AAN) system in place and operational, this approval is conditional on FEMA's verification of the A8N system in accordance with the joint Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)/FEMA criteria in NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-l, Rev. 1, Appendix 3 and FEMA-43, "Standard Guide for the Evaluation of Alert and Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants".

Sincerely, Samuel W. Speck Associate Director State and Local Programs and Support

t~

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18023A047&oldid=1956889"