ML18051A461: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:... | {{#Wiki_filter:... | ||
ATTACHMENT Consumers Power Company Palisades Plant - Docket 50-255 SUPPLEMENT 1 TO NUREG-0737, MILESTONE ACTIVITY - SUBMITTAL OF AN UPDATED DETAILED CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW PROGRAM PLAN June 7, 1983 r--8306130335 -830607___ _ 11 Pages PDR ADOCK 05000255 F PDR OC0683-0002D-NL02 | |||
* | * | ||
* e I. INTRODUCTION The program to review the human factors of the Palisades Nuclear Plant Control Room was initiated in late 1980. A substantial amount of the work has already been completed. | * e I. INTRODUCTION The program to review the human factors of the Palisades Nuclear Plant Control Room was initiated in late 1980. A substantial amount of the work has already been completed. The control room configuration has been documented, a full scale mockup has been constructed, procedures have been walked-through utilizing that mockup, and much of the control room has been evaluated against human factors guidelines. Some further work in these areas remains to be completed. Assessment of the findings and the formulation, evaluation, and implementation of corrective action has begun. The basic objectives are identical to those in NUREG-0700, but because the review was initiated far in advance of that document's issue, there are some differences in methodology. However, we believe they are differences in form and not in substance and that the end results of the Palisades human factors review will be consistent with the guidance provided by NUREG-0700. | ||
The control room configuration has been documented, a full scale mockup has been constructed, procedures have been walked-through utilizing that mockup, and much of the control room has been evaluated against human factors guidelines. | The human factors review will make use of information from NRC mandated updating programs - such as the updating of emergency procedures. Consumers Power Company, however, does not plan to delay the control room review effort at Palisades until these other programs are complete. Because the "window" Revised May 1983 OC0683-0002C-NL02 | ||
Some further work in these areas remains to be completed. | |||
Assessment of the findings and the formulation, evaluation, and implementation of corrective action has begun. The basic objectives are identical to those in NUREG-0700, but because the review was initiated far in advance of that document's issue, there are some differences in methodology. | 2 to do significant work in the control room is constrained in practice to planned refueling shutdowns, delaying the control room review would jeopardize the ability to do any significant improvements in the next shutdown (1983). As information from these programs becomes available, it will be factored into the review. For example, new walk-throughs will be conducted if necessary and corrective action implemented as appropriate during plant shutdowns. | ||
However, we believe they are differences in form and not in substance and that the end results of the Palisades human factors review will be consistent with the guidance provided by NUREG-0700. | The schedule for completion of the control room review at Palisades is summarized in Table I-1. | ||
The human factors review will make use of information from NRC mandated updating programs -such as the updating of emergency procedures. | I.2 Revised May 1983 OC0683-0002C-NL02 | ||
Consumers Power Company, however, does not plan to delay the control room review effort at Palisades until these other programs are complete. | * 3 TABLE I-1 ESTIMATED SCHEDULE FOR PALISADES CONTROL ROOM REVIEW TASK ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE Submit Program Plan to NRG March 1982 Complete Review of Main Panels December 1982 Identity Short Term Improvements February 1983 Required Update Program Plan and Submit to NRG June 1983 Implement Short-Term Improvements 1983 Outage Complete Review of Control Room June 1984 Including Review of New Emergency Procedure Guidelines Submit Interim Control Room Design September 1984 Review Report to NRG Implement Long Term Improvements Subsequent Outages Issue Final Control Room Determined by Plan Design Review Report I.3 Revised May 1983 OC0683-0002C-NL02 | ||
Because the "window" Revised May 1983 OC0683-0002C-NL02 2 to do significant work in the control room is constrained in practice to planned refueling shutdowns, delaying the control room review would jeopardize the ability to do any significant improvements in the next shutdown (1983). As information from these programs becomes available, it will be factored into the review. For example, new walk-throughs will be conducted if necessary and corrective action implemented as appropriate during plant shutdowns. | |||
The schedule for completion of the control room review at Palisades is summarized in Table I-1. I.2 Revised May 1983 OC0683-0002C-NL02 | II. MANAGEMENT AND STAFFING The performance of the human factors review is the responsiblity of a team made up of personnel from Consumers Power Company (both engineering and operations), MPR Associates, and an independent outside consultant, Dr TB Sheridan of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The responsibility and functions of the members of the team are described below; resumes are included in Appendix B of this plan. | ||
* 3 TABLE I-1 ESTIMATED SCHEDULE FOR PALISADES CONTROL ROOM REVIEW TASK Submit Program Plan to NRG Complete Review of Main Panels Identity Short Term Improvements Required Update Program Plan and Submit to NRG Implement Short-Term Improvements Complete Review of Control Room Including Review of New Emergency Procedure Guidelines Submit Interim Control Room Design Review Report to NRG Implement Long Term Improvements Issue Final Control Room Design Review Report OC0683-0002C-NL02 | MPR Associates, Inc. | ||
The responsibility and functions of the members of the team are described below; resumes are included in Appendix B of this plan. MPR Associates, Inc. MPR is responsible to provide the major portion of the detailed management and review effort. This includes providing the full scale mockup and control room drawings, conducting the procedure walk-throughs, comparing the control room to the detailed guidelines, and establishing potential modifications. | MPR is responsible to provide the major portion of the detailed management and review effort. This includes providing the full scale mockup and control room drawings, conducting the procedure walk-throughs, comparing the control room to the detailed guidelines, and establishing potential modifications. For this purpose MPR has assembled a working group consisting of Messrs H Estrada, D H Harrison, J Hibbard and A Zarechnak, with supporting services such as drafting. It may be augmented by other MPR staff personnel where special skills or experiences are required. | ||
For this purpose MPR has assembled a working group consisting of Messrs H Estrada, D H Harrison, J Hibbard and A Zarechnak, with supporting services such as drafting. | Revised May 1983 OC0683-0002B-NL02 | ||
It may be augmented by other MPR staff personnel where special skills or experiences are required. | |||
Revised May 1983 OC0683-0002B-NL02 | .. | ||
.. -.. | * | ||
-.. | |||
Individual licensed operators participate in several aspects of the review including the procedure walkthroughs, environmental survey, and review of operating experience. | 2 Consumers Power Company Plant operations was previously represented on the review by Mr W S Skibitsky and is presently represented by Mr C Kozup. Mr Skibitsky was the Operations Superintendent and holder of a senior reactor operator license at the Palisades Plant until late 1982. Beginning in early 1983, Mr Kozup replaced Mr Skibitsky as Operations Superintendent and member of the review team. | ||
Engineering is represented on the review team by four individuals: | Messrs Skibitsky and Kozup participate in planning, review results, and assure that plant operators' input is provided. Individual licensed operators participate in several aspects of the review including the procedure walkthroughs, environmental survey, and review of operating experience. Engineering is represented on the review team by four individuals: Mr R L Muzzi from the plant engineering staff and Messrs R R Biggs and K A Toner and R E Schrader from the general office engineering staff. Messrs Muzzi, Biggs and Toner participate in the planning, review results, and assure that engineering input from various sources is incorporated. This includes other ongoing plant modifications and obtaining necessary information from the architect-engineer and other contractors to Consumers Power Company. Mr Schrader's responsibilities include the human factors review of ongoing and future control room modifications. Messrs Skibitsky, Muzzi, Biggs and Toner participated in a Consumers Power Human Factors Training Seminar in January, 1982. | ||
Mr R L Muzzi from the plant engineering staff and Messrs R R Biggs and K A Toner and R E Schrader from the general office engineering staff. Messrs Muzzi, Biggs and Toner participate in the planning, review results, and assure that engineering input from various sources is incorporated. | 11.2 Revised May 1983 OC0683-0002B-NL02 | ||
This includes other ongoing plant modifications and obtaining necessary information from the architect-engineer and other contractors to Consumers Power Company. Mr Schrader's responsibilities include the human factors review of ongoing and future control room modifications. | |||
Messrs Skibitsky, Muzzi, Biggs and Toner participated in a Consumers Power Human Factors Training Seminar in January, 1982. 11.2 Revised May 1983 OC0683-0002B-NL02 3 Outside Consultant Dr T B Sheridan, Professor* | 3 Outside Consultant Dr T B Sheridan, Professor* of Engineering and Applied Psychology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology provides the review team with assistance and an overview of the human factors aspects of the review such as methodology, interpretation of guidelines, assessment of error potentials, and evaluations of potential improvements. | ||
of Engineering and Applied Psychology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology provides the review team with assistance and an overview of the human factors aspects of the review such as methodology, interpretation of guidelines, assessment of error potentials, and evaluations of potential improvements. | II.3 Revised May 1983 OC0683-0002B-NL02 | ||
II.3 Revised May 1983 OC0683-0002B-NL02 | |||
! '. '--, | ! '. '- | ||
CHARLES S KOZUP Consumers Power Company Palisades Nuclear Plant Route i2, Box 154 Covert, MI 49043 BS Metallurgical Engineering | -, | ||
-1971 MS Metallurgical Engineering | .. -. | ||
-1980 BS from Cleveland State University MS from Uriiversity of Pittsburgh Consumers Power Company -1981 to Present Operations Superintendent-Palisades | - | ||
-1982 Direct* activities in Operations Department Shift Technical Advisory -Palisades | APPENDIX B PALISADES CONTROL ROOM REVIEW TEAM RESUMES | ||
-1981 Operation technical support, on shift Senior Plant Engineer -Westinghouse Electric Corporation Idaho Falls -1977-1981 Supervised operation,* | |||
maintenance and training activities Senior Engineer, Westinghouse Electric Corporation Bettis Atomic Power Lab -1973-1977 Technical followup of naval reactor core production Product Research Supervisor | CHARLES S KOZUP Business Address: Consumers Power Company Palisades Nuclear Plant Route i2, Box 154 Covert, MI 49043 BS Metallurgical Engineering - 1971 MS Metallurgical Engineering - 1980 BS from Cleveland State University MS from Uriiversity of Pittsburgh Experience: Consumers Power Company - 1981 to Present Operations Superintendent-Palisades - 1982 Direct* activities in Operations Department Shift Technical Advisory - Palisades - 1981 Operation technical support, on shift Senior Plant Engineer - Westinghouse Electric Corporation Idaho Falls - 1977-1981 Supervised operation,* maintenance and training activities Senior Engineer, Westinghouse Electric Corporation Bettis Atomic Power Lab - 1973-1977 Technical followup of naval reactor core production Product Research Supervisor - Premier Industrial Corporation, Cleveland, Ohio - | ||
-Premier Industrial Corporation, Cleveland, Ohio -1971-1973 Technical support in all areas | 1971-1973 Technical support in all areas | ||
*'II .. L | |||
* ROBERT ELLSWORTH SCHRADER | * | ||
Consumers Power Company, General Off ice Jackson, MI -5/61 (2 weeks) Mathematics Course consisted of slide rule, logarithms, exponentials; algebra and trigonometry review; introduction to calculus symbols. Jackson Junior College Jackson, MI -6/61 -7/61 (8 weeks) Basic reactor tedhnology, applied reactor physics and health physics; use and pretation of radiation measurement equipment. | *'II .. L | ||
DeVry Technical Institute Chicago, IL -7/61 -1/62 Electronic Controls for Automation Electronic fundamentals, circuitry and controls of motor control circuits, cess controls, servo controls and nuclear instrumentation. | ~* | ||
International Correspondence Schools Division I -Electrical Engineering Completed in 1965 North Central Michigan College Petoskey, MI Refresher Mathematics Course (Ill) Completed January, 1969 | ROBERT ELLSWORTH SCHRADER Business Address: Consumers Power Company 1945 W Parna~l Road Jackson, MI 49201 Education: US Navy Electronics Technician School, Class "A" Great Lakes, IL - 9/50 - 7/51 Basic electronics through operation and maintenance of communication, radar, sonar and test equipment. | ||
* 1:' L. i * ...., I Experience: | Consumers Power Company, General Off ice Jackson, MI - 5/61 (2 weeks) | ||
* Consumers Power Company September 1956 to Present B C Cobb Generating Plant (510 MWe) Muskegon, MI -9/56 -5/61 Laboratory Technician; Senior Laboratory Technician; Efficiency Analyst Plant efficiency calculations and monitor- | Mathematics Course consisted of slide rule, logarithms, exponentials; algebra and trigonometry review; introduction to calculus symbols. | ||
Jackson Junior College Jackson, MI - 6/61 - 7/61 (8 weeks) | |||
Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant Charlevoix, MI -2/62 -1/68 Instrument | Basic reactor tedhnology, applied reactor physics and health physics; use and inter-pretation of radiation measurement equipment. | ||
& Control Technician; Plant Technician Performed calibration, performance testing, modifications, etc. on all nuclear and conventional instrument and control systems associated with the plant. 2/68 -10/76 Instrument | DeVry Technical Institute Chicago, IL - 7/61 - 1/62 Electronic Controls for Automation Electronic fundamentals, circuitry and controls of motor control circuits, pro-cess controls, servo controls and nuclear instrumentation. | ||
& Control Supervisor Responsible for calibration and maintenance of all plant instrumentation and control systems. Instructed reactor operator license candidates in various phases of plaot instrumentation including neutron monitoring systems, reactor protection system, manual reactor control system, feedwater control system, turbine bypass valve control system, and miscellaneous lectures on plant systems. Responsible for design and implementation of plant modifications involving instrument and control and plant electrical systems. 10/76 -9/77 Senior Technologist Responsible for plant projects; served as Project Engineer and Project Leader. Completed projects involving ASME BP&V, Section XI and ANSI-B31.1 piping codes in addition to electrical and instrumentation | International Correspondence Schools Division I - Electrical Engineering Completed in 1965 North Central Michigan College Petoskey, MI Refresher Mathematics Course (Ill) | ||
:;ystems *. | Completed January, 1969 | ||
*1:' L. i * ...., I Experience: | |||
Inservice | * Consumers Power Company September 1956 to Present B C Cobb Generating Plant (510 MWe) | ||
*Inspection per ASME-BP&V Code, Section Shift Technical Advisor programs (post-TMI) and serving as On Duty Superintendent, as required. | Muskegon, MI - 9/56 - 5/61 Laboratory Technician; Senior Laboratory Technician; Efficiency Analyst Plant efficiency calculations and monitor- | ||
For approximately two years, responsibilities included direction of the onsite Quality Control group. General Off ice -Nuclear Operations Department Jackson, MI -7/82 to Present General Supervisor, Nuclear Instrumentation | _ing of thermal performance, instrument maintenance, combustion control equipment maintenance and boiler water chemistry * | ||
& Control, Nuclear Plant Support Department. | (900# and 2100# Combustion Engineering boilers). | ||
Responsibilities include providing engineering assistance to Company operating nuclear plants in the areas of instrumentation | Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant Charlevoix, MI - 2/62 - 1/68 Instrument & Control Technician; Plant Technician Performed trouble~shooting, calibration, performance testing, modifications, etc. | ||
& | on all nuclear and conventional instrument and control systems associated with the plant. | ||
plant electrical systems; process computer system and plant modifications. | 2/68 - 10/76 Instrument & Control Supervisor Responsible for calibration and maintenance of all plant instrumentation and control systems. Instructed reactor operator license candidates in various phases of plaot instrumentation including neutron monitoring systems, reactor protection system, manual reactor control system, feedwater control system, turbine bypass valve control system, and miscellaneous lectures on plant systems. Responsible for design and implementation of plant modifications involving instrument and control and plant electrical systems. | ||
US Navy -7/50 -5/54 Electronic Maintenance; attained Petty Officer Second Class (ET2). | 10/76 - 9/77 Senior Technologist Responsible for plant projects; served as Project Engineer and Project Leader. | ||
* Central Paper Company Muskegon, MI -6/54 -10/54 Paper | Completed projects involving ASME BP&V, Section XI and ANSI-B31.1 piping codes in addition to electrical and instrumentation | ||
Expired -Big Rock Point Plant -1969 | :;ystems *. | ||
* | |||
* 1 | |||
"-- .... , ... ~.* *-'\..->.' | |||
. .. | |||
10/77 - 6/82 Technical Superintendent Responsible for all plant project engi-neering: reactor engineering: Inservice | |||
*Inspection per ASME-BP&V Code, Section X~; | |||
Shift Technical Advisor programs (post-TMI) and serving as On Duty Superintendent, as required. For approximately two years, responsibilities included direction of the onsite Quality Control group. | |||
General Off ice - Nuclear Operations Department Jackson, MI - 7/82 to Present General Supervisor, Nuclear Instrumentation | |||
& Control, Nuclear Plant Support Department. | |||
Responsibilities include providing engineering assistance to Company operating nuclear plants in the areas of instrumentation & | |||
Control~ plant electrical systems; process computer system and plant modifications. | |||
US Navy - 7/50 - 5/54 Electronic Maintenance; attained Petty Officer Second Class (ET2). | |||
* Central Paper Company Muskegon, MI - 6/54 - 10/54 Paper manufacturing Thomas A Edison, Inc Grand Rapids, MI - 10/54 - 8/56 Installation and servicing of dictating and centralized dictation systems. | |||
Licenses Held: Senior Reactor Operator License (SOP-1174) | |||
Expired - Big Rock Point Plant - 1969}} |
Revision as of 20:01, 21 October 2019
ML18051A461 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Palisades |
Issue date: | 06/07/1983 |
From: | CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML18051A460 | List: |
References | |
RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737 PROC-830607, NUDOCS 8306130335 | |
Download: ML18051A461 (12) | |
Text
...
ATTACHMENT Consumers Power Company Palisades Plant - Docket 50-255 SUPPLEMENT 1 TO NUREG-0737, MILESTONE ACTIVITY - SUBMITTAL OF AN UPDATED DETAILED CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW PROGRAM PLAN June 7, 1983 r--8306130335 -830607___ _ 11 Pages PDR ADOCK 05000255 F PDR OC0683-0002D-NL02
- e I. INTRODUCTION The program to review the human factors of the Palisades Nuclear Plant Control Room was initiated in late 1980. A substantial amount of the work has already been completed. The control room configuration has been documented, a full scale mockup has been constructed, procedures have been walked-through utilizing that mockup, and much of the control room has been evaluated against human factors guidelines. Some further work in these areas remains to be completed. Assessment of the findings and the formulation, evaluation, and implementation of corrective action has begun. The basic objectives are identical to those in NUREG-0700, but because the review was initiated far in advance of that document's issue, there are some differences in methodology. However, we believe they are differences in form and not in substance and that the end results of the Palisades human factors review will be consistent with the guidance provided by NUREG-0700.
The human factors review will make use of information from NRC mandated updating programs - such as the updating of emergency procedures. Consumers Power Company, however, does not plan to delay the control room review effort at Palisades until these other programs are complete. Because the "window" Revised May 1983 OC0683-0002C-NL02
2 to do significant work in the control room is constrained in practice to planned refueling shutdowns, delaying the control room review would jeopardize the ability to do any significant improvements in the next shutdown (1983). As information from these programs becomes available, it will be factored into the review. For example, new walk-throughs will be conducted if necessary and corrective action implemented as appropriate during plant shutdowns.
The schedule for completion of the control room review at Palisades is summarized in Table I-1.
I.2 Revised May 1983 OC0683-0002C-NL02
- 3 TABLE I-1 ESTIMATED SCHEDULE FOR PALISADES CONTROL ROOM REVIEW TASK ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE Submit Program Plan to NRG March 1982 Complete Review of Main Panels December 1982 Identity Short Term Improvements February 1983 Required Update Program Plan and Submit to NRG June 1983 Implement Short-Term Improvements 1983 Outage Complete Review of Control Room June 1984 Including Review of New Emergency Procedure Guidelines Submit Interim Control Room Design September 1984 Review Report to NRG Implement Long Term Improvements Subsequent Outages Issue Final Control Room Determined by Plan Design Review Report I.3 Revised May 1983 OC0683-0002C-NL02
II. MANAGEMENT AND STAFFING The performance of the human factors review is the responsiblity of a team made up of personnel from Consumers Power Company (both engineering and operations), MPR Associates, and an independent outside consultant, Dr TB Sheridan of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The responsibility and functions of the members of the team are described below; resumes are included in Appendix B of this plan.
MPR Associates, Inc.
MPR is responsible to provide the major portion of the detailed management and review effort. This includes providing the full scale mockup and control room drawings, conducting the procedure walk-throughs, comparing the control room to the detailed guidelines, and establishing potential modifications. For this purpose MPR has assembled a working group consisting of Messrs H Estrada, D H Harrison, J Hibbard and A Zarechnak, with supporting services such as drafting. It may be augmented by other MPR staff personnel where special skills or experiences are required.
Revised May 1983 OC0683-0002B-NL02
..
-..
2 Consumers Power Company Plant operations was previously represented on the review by Mr W S Skibitsky and is presently represented by Mr C Kozup. Mr Skibitsky was the Operations Superintendent and holder of a senior reactor operator license at the Palisades Plant until late 1982. Beginning in early 1983, Mr Kozup replaced Mr Skibitsky as Operations Superintendent and member of the review team.
Messrs Skibitsky and Kozup participate in planning, review results, and assure that plant operators' input is provided. Individual licensed operators participate in several aspects of the review including the procedure walkthroughs, environmental survey, and review of operating experience. Engineering is represented on the review team by four individuals: Mr R L Muzzi from the plant engineering staff and Messrs R R Biggs and K A Toner and R E Schrader from the general office engineering staff. Messrs Muzzi, Biggs and Toner participate in the planning, review results, and assure that engineering input from various sources is incorporated. This includes other ongoing plant modifications and obtaining necessary information from the architect-engineer and other contractors to Consumers Power Company. Mr Schrader's responsibilities include the human factors review of ongoing and future control room modifications. Messrs Skibitsky, Muzzi, Biggs and Toner participated in a Consumers Power Human Factors Training Seminar in January, 1982.
11.2 Revised May 1983 OC0683-0002B-NL02
3 Outside Consultant Dr T B Sheridan, Professor* of Engineering and Applied Psychology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology provides the review team with assistance and an overview of the human factors aspects of the review such as methodology, interpretation of guidelines, assessment of error potentials, and evaluations of potential improvements.
II.3 Revised May 1983 OC0683-0002B-NL02
! '. '-
-,
.. -.
-
APPENDIX B PALISADES CONTROL ROOM REVIEW TEAM RESUMES
CHARLES S KOZUP Business Address: Consumers Power Company Palisades Nuclear Plant Route i2, Box 154 Covert, MI 49043 BS Metallurgical Engineering - 1971 MS Metallurgical Engineering - 1980 BS from Cleveland State University MS from Uriiversity of Pittsburgh Experience: Consumers Power Company - 1981 to Present Operations Superintendent-Palisades - 1982 Direct* activities in Operations Department Shift Technical Advisory - Palisades - 1981 Operation technical support, on shift Senior Plant Engineer - Westinghouse Electric Corporation Idaho Falls - 1977-1981 Supervised operation,* maintenance and training activities Senior Engineer, Westinghouse Electric Corporation Bettis Atomic Power Lab - 1973-1977 Technical followup of naval reactor core production Product Research Supervisor - Premier Industrial Corporation, Cleveland, Ohio -
1971-1973 Technical support in all areas
- 'II .. L
~*
ROBERT ELLSWORTH SCHRADER Business Address: Consumers Power Company 1945 W Parna~l Road Jackson, MI 49201 Education: US Navy Electronics Technician School, Class "A" Great Lakes, IL - 9/50 - 7/51 Basic electronics through operation and maintenance of communication, radar, sonar and test equipment.
Consumers Power Company, General Off ice Jackson, MI - 5/61 (2 weeks)
Mathematics Course consisted of slide rule, logarithms, exponentials; algebra and trigonometry review; introduction to calculus symbols.
Jackson Junior College Jackson, MI - 6/61 - 7/61 (8 weeks)
Basic reactor tedhnology, applied reactor physics and health physics; use and inter-pretation of radiation measurement equipment.
DeVry Technical Institute Chicago, IL - 7/61 - 1/62 Electronic Controls for Automation Electronic fundamentals, circuitry and controls of motor control circuits, pro-cess controls, servo controls and nuclear instrumentation.
International Correspondence Schools Division I - Electrical Engineering Completed in 1965 North Central Michigan College Petoskey, MI Refresher Mathematics Course (Ill)
Completed January, 1969
- 1:' L. i * ...., I Experience:
- Consumers Power Company September 1956 to Present B C Cobb Generating Plant (510 MWe)
Muskegon, MI - 9/56 - 5/61 Laboratory Technician; Senior Laboratory Technician; Efficiency Analyst Plant efficiency calculations and monitor-
_ing of thermal performance, instrument maintenance, combustion control equipment maintenance and boiler water chemistry *
(900# and 2100# Combustion Engineering boilers).
Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant Charlevoix, MI - 2/62 - 1/68 Instrument & Control Technician; Plant Technician Performed trouble~shooting, calibration, performance testing, modifications, etc.
on all nuclear and conventional instrument and control systems associated with the plant.
2/68 - 10/76 Instrument & Control Supervisor Responsible for calibration and maintenance of all plant instrumentation and control systems. Instructed reactor operator license candidates in various phases of plaot instrumentation including neutron monitoring systems, reactor protection system, manual reactor control system, feedwater control system, turbine bypass valve control system, and miscellaneous lectures on plant systems. Responsible for design and implementation of plant modifications involving instrument and control and plant electrical systems.
10/76 - 9/77 Senior Technologist Responsible for plant projects; served as Project Engineer and Project Leader.
Completed projects involving ASME BP&V,Section XI and ANSI-B31.1 piping codes in addition to electrical and instrumentation
- ystems *.
- 1
"-- .... , ... ~.* *-'\..->.'
. ..
10/77 - 6/82 Technical Superintendent Responsible for all plant project engi-neering: reactor engineering: Inservice
- Inspection per ASME-BP&V Code, Section X~;
Shift Technical Advisor programs (post-TMI) and serving as On Duty Superintendent, as required. For approximately two years, responsibilities included direction of the onsite Quality Control group.
General Off ice - Nuclear Operations Department Jackson, MI - 7/82 to Present General Supervisor, Nuclear Instrumentation
& Control, Nuclear Plant Support Department.
Responsibilities include providing engineering assistance to Company operating nuclear plants in the areas of instrumentation &
Control~ plant electrical systems; process computer system and plant modifications.
US Navy - 7/50 - 5/54 Electronic Maintenance; attained Petty Officer Second Class (ET2).
- Central Paper Company Muskegon, MI - 6/54 - 10/54 Paper manufacturing Thomas A Edison, Inc Grand Rapids, MI - 10/54 - 8/56 Installation and servicing of dictating and centralized dictation systems.
Licenses Held: Senior Reactor Operator License (SOP-1174)
Expired - Big Rock Point Plant - 1969