ML19015A017: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 01/28/2019 | | issue date = 01/28/2019 | ||
| title = Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure for Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 | | title = Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure for Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 | ||
| author name = Kuntz R | | author name = Kuntz R | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII | ||
| addressee name = Lies Q | | addressee name = Lies Q | ||
| addressee affiliation = Indiana Michigan Power Co | | addressee affiliation = Indiana Michigan Power Co | ||
| docket = 05000315, 05000316 | | docket = 05000315, 05000316 | ||
| license number = DPR-058, DPR-074 | | license number = DPR-058, DPR-074 | ||
| contact person = Kuntz R | | contact person = Kuntz R | ||
| case reference number = EPID L-2018-LLA-0726 | | case reference number = EPID L-2018-LLA-0726 | ||
| document type = Letter | | document type = Letter | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON , D.C. 20555-0001 Mr. Q. Shane Lies Site Vice President Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group One Cook Place Bridgman, Ml 49106 | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 January 28, 2019 Mr. Q. Shane Lies Site Vice President Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group One Cook Place Bridgman, Ml 49106 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE FOR DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 (EPID L-2018-LLA-0726) | REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE FOR DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 (EPID L-2018-LLA-0726) | ||
==Dear Mr. Lies:== | ==Dear Mr. Lies:== | ||
By letter dated November 20, 2018, you submitted affidavits dated January 15, 2018, January 17, 2018, and September 14, 2018, executed by James A. Gresham and Edmond J. Mercier, Westinghouse Electric Company LLC., requesting that the information contained in the following documents be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 2, Section 2.390: WCAP-18295-P, Revision 0, "Technical Justification for Eliminating Accumulator Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2, Using Break Methodology" (Proprietary) | |||
WCAP-18302-P, Revision 0, "Technical Justification for Eliminating Residual Heat . Removal Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2, Using Leak-Before-Break Methodology" (Proprietary) | By letter dated November 20, 2018, you submitted affidavits dated January 15, 2018, January 17, 2018, and September 14, 2018, executed by James A. Gresham and Edmond J. | ||
WCAP-18309-P, Revision 0, "Technical Justification for Eliminating Safety Injection Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units I and 2, Using Break Methodology" (Proprietary) | Mercier, Westinghouse Electric Company LLC., requesting that the information contained in the following documents be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 2, Section 2.390: | ||
WCAP-18394-P, Revision 1, "Fatigue Crack Growth Evaluations of D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2 RHR., Accumulator, and Safety Injection Lines Supporting Expanded Scope Before-Break" (Proprietary) | WCAP-18295-P, Revision 0, "Technical Justification for Eliminating Accumulator Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2, Using Leak-Before-Break Methodology" (Proprietary) | ||
WCAP-18302-P, Revision 0, "Technical Justification for Eliminating Residual Heat | |||
. Removal Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2, Using Leak-Before-Break Methodology" (Proprietary) | |||
WCAP-18309-P, Revision 0, "Technical Justification for Eliminating Safety Injection Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units I and 2, Using Leak-Before-Break Methodology" (Proprietary) | |||
WCAP-18394-P, Revision 1, "Fatigue Crack Growth Evaluations of D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2 RHR. , Accumulator, and Safety Injection Lines Supporting Expanded Scope Leak-Before-Break" (Proprietary) | |||
LTR-SDA-11-18-41-P, Revision 1, "Responses to NRC Question on the Expanded Scope Leak-Before-Break Evaluations for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2" (Proprietary) | LTR-SDA-11-18-41-P, Revision 1, "Responses to NRC Question on the Expanded Scope Leak-Before-Break Evaluations for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2" (Proprietary) | ||
The affidavit stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons: * (a) The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of Q. Lies Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies. (b) It consists of supporting data , including test data, relative to a process (or component , structure , tool , method , etc.), the application of which data secures a competitive economic advantage (e.g., by optimization or improved marketability). (c) Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design , manufacture , shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product. (d) It reveals cost or price information, production capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of Westinghouse , its customers or suppliers. (e) It reveals aspects of past , present , or future Westinghouse or customer funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Westinghouse. (f) It contains patentable ideas , for which patent protection may be desirable. | The affidavit stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons: | ||
* (a) The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of | |||
Q. Lies Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies. | |||
(b) It consists of supporting data, including test data, relative to a process (or component, structure, tool , method, etc.), the application of which data secures a competitive economic advantage (e.g., by optimization or improved marketability). | |||
(c) Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product. | |||
(d) It reveals cost or price information, production capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of Westinghouse, its customers or suppliers. | |||
(e) It reveals aspects of past, present, or future Westinghouse or customer funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Westinghouse. | |||
(f) It contains patentable ideas, for which patent protection may be desirable. | |||
We have reviewed your application and the material in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 and, on the basis of the statements in the affidavit, have determined that the submitted information sought to be withheld contains proprietary commercial information and should be withheld from public disclosure. | We have reviewed your application and the material in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 and, on the basis of the statements in the affidavit, have determined that the submitted information sought to be withheld contains proprietary commercial information and should be withheld from public disclosure. | ||
Therefore, WCAP-18295-P, Revision 0 , "Technical Justification for Eliminating Accumulator Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2, Using Leak-Before-Break Methodology" (Proprietary), WCAP-18302-P , Revision 0, " | Therefore, WCAP-18295-P, Revision 0, "Technical Justification for Eliminating Accumulator Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2, Using Leak-Before-Break Methodology" (Proprietary), WCAP-18302-P, Revision 0, "Technical' Justification for Eliminating Residual Heat Removal Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2, Using Leak-Before-Break Methodology" (Proprietary), WCAP-18309-P, Revision 0, "Technical Justification for Eliminating Safety Injection Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units I and 2, Using Leak-Before-Break Methodology" (Proprietary), | ||
If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). You also should understand that Q. Lies the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example , if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information. In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above. You will be notified in advance of any public disclosure. If you have any questions regarding this matter , I may be reached at 301-415-3733. Sincerely, . Docket Nos.: 50-315 and 50-316 cc: Listserv | WCAP-18394-P, Revision 1, "Fatigue Crack Growth Evaluations of D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2 RHR., Accumulator, and Safety Injection Lines Supporting Expanded Scope Leak-Before-Break" (Proprietary), and LTR-SDA-11-18-41-P, Revision 1, "Responses to NRC Question on the Expanded Scope Leak-Before-Break Evaluations for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2" (Proprietary), will be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390(b)(5) and Section 103(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. | ||
Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents. If the need arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in this area. We will, of course, ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information. | |||
If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). You also should understand that | |||
Q . Lies the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information. In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above. You will be notified in advance of any public disclosure. | |||
If you have any questions regarding this matter, I may be reached at 301-415-3733. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
. Docket Nos.: 50-315 and 50-316 cc: Listserv | |||
ML19015A017 * - via e-mail OFFICE DORL/LPL3/PM DORL/LPL3/LA DMLR/MPHB/BC NAME RKuntz SRohrer SRuffin* | |||
DATE 1/11/19 1/15/19 1/24/19 OFFICE DSS/SCPB/BC DORL/LPL3/BC DORL/LPL3/PM NAME SAnderson* DWrona RKuntz DATE 1/16/19 1/28/19 1/28/19}} | |||
Latest revision as of 06:51, 20 October 2019
| ML19015A017 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 01/28/2019 |
| From: | Robert Kuntz Plant Licensing Branch III |
| To: | Lies Q Indiana Michigan Power Co |
| Kuntz R | |
| References | |
| EPID L-2018-LLA-0726 | |
| Download: ML19015A017 (4) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 January 28, 2019 Mr. Q. Shane Lies Site Vice President Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group One Cook Place Bridgman, Ml 49106
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE FOR DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 (EPID L-2018-LLA-0726)
Dear Mr. Lies:
By letter dated November 20, 2018, you submitted affidavits dated January 15, 2018, January 17, 2018, and September 14, 2018, executed by James A. Gresham and Edmond J.
Mercier, Westinghouse Electric Company LLC., requesting that the information contained in the following documents be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 2, Section 2.390:
WCAP-18295-P, Revision 0, "Technical Justification for Eliminating Accumulator Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2, Using Leak-Before-Break Methodology" (Proprietary)
WCAP-18302-P, Revision 0, "Technical Justification for Eliminating Residual Heat
. Removal Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2, Using Leak-Before-Break Methodology" (Proprietary)
WCAP-18309-P, Revision 0, "Technical Justification for Eliminating Safety Injection Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units I and 2, Using Leak-Before-Break Methodology" (Proprietary)
WCAP-18394-P, Revision 1, "Fatigue Crack Growth Evaluations of D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2 RHR. , Accumulator, and Safety Injection Lines Supporting Expanded Scope Leak-Before-Break" (Proprietary)
LTR-SDA-11-18-41-P, Revision 1, "Responses to NRC Question on the Expanded Scope Leak-Before-Break Evaluations for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2" (Proprietary)
The affidavit stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons:
- (a) The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of
Q. Lies Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies.
(b) It consists of supporting data, including test data, relative to a process (or component, structure, tool , method, etc.), the application of which data secures a competitive economic advantage (e.g., by optimization or improved marketability).
(c) Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product.
(d) It reveals cost or price information, production capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of Westinghouse, its customers or suppliers.
(e) It reveals aspects of past, present, or future Westinghouse or customer funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Westinghouse.
(f) It contains patentable ideas, for which patent protection may be desirable.
We have reviewed your application and the material in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 and, on the basis of the statements in the affidavit, have determined that the submitted information sought to be withheld contains proprietary commercial information and should be withheld from public disclosure.
Therefore, WCAP-18295-P, Revision 0, "Technical Justification for Eliminating Accumulator Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2, Using Leak-Before-Break Methodology" (Proprietary), WCAP-18302-P, Revision 0, "Technical' Justification for Eliminating Residual Heat Removal Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2, Using Leak-Before-Break Methodology" (Proprietary), WCAP-18309-P, Revision 0, "Technical Justification for Eliminating Safety Injection Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units I and 2, Using Leak-Before-Break Methodology" (Proprietary),
WCAP-18394-P, Revision 1, "Fatigue Crack Growth Evaluations of D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2 RHR., Accumulator, and Safety Injection Lines Supporting Expanded Scope Leak-Before-Break" (Proprietary), and LTR-SDA-11-18-41-P, Revision 1, "Responses to NRC Question on the Expanded Scope Leak-Before-Break Evaluations for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2" (Proprietary), will be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390(b)(5) and Section 103(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.
Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents. If the need arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in this area. We will, of course, ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information.
If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). You also should understand that
Q . Lies the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information. In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above. You will be notified in advance of any public disclosure.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, I may be reached at 301-415-3733.
Sincerely,
. Docket Nos.: 50-315 and 50-316 cc: Listserv
ML19015A017 * - via e-mail OFFICE DORL/LPL3/PM DORL/LPL3/LA DMLR/MPHB/BC NAME RKuntz SRohrer SRuffin*
DATE 1/11/19 1/15/19 1/24/19 OFFICE DSS/SCPB/BC DORL/LPL3/BC DORL/LPL3/PM NAME SAnderson* DWrona RKuntz DATE 1/16/19 1/28/19 1/28/19