ML17205A112: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 05/23/2017
| issue date = 05/23/2017
| title = 2017 Point Beach Nuclear Plant Initial License Examination Form Es 301-3
| title = 2017 Point Beach Nuclear Plant Initial License Examination Form Es 301-3
| author name = Seymour J L
| author name = Seymour J
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OB
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OB
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  

Revision as of 10:18, 19 June 2019

2017 Point Beach Nuclear Plant Initial License Examination Form Es 301-3
ML17205A112
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/23/2017
From: Jesse Seymour
Operations Branch III
To:
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
Shared Package
ML16319A344 List:
References
Download: ML17205A112 (1)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facilitv: PBNP Date of Examination: M av B - 19,2017 Test Number: 2017 L General Criteria lnitials a b.c#a.The sam ope rating test conforms with the prevrous ly a pproved outlin changes are con SI stent with uirements 1 0 c F R m distri butl 4 f\-{/b.There is no day{o-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered duri this examination /r r The test shall not icate items from the audit Section D.1.a.cál fr 9/d Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within limits 4 TL r e.It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent a icants at the nated license level f\-r 2. Walk-Thro h Criteria a.Each JPM includes the following, as applicable: initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facilty licensee operationally imporlant specific performance criteria that include: detailed expected actions wth exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable ,/-/b.Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk{hrough outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and2) have not caused the test to deviate criteria (e.9., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 from any of the acceptance nations) specified N on forms and Form ES-201-2./TL//3. Simulator Criteria The assocated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been in accordance wth Form ES-301-4 and a is attached.4 rL r e / Sign Date ,t/zx/t t a. Author b. Facility Reviewe(.)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)üs\d. NRC Supervisor

,r*\.r"r T J¿sçc o4r s/t l').\-\¿ ) tl NOTE: . The faclity signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests# lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c" chief examner concurrence red.}}