ML19015A017: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = 05000315, 05000316
| docket = 05000315, 05000316
| license number = DPR-058, DPR-074
| license number = DPR-058, DPR-074
| contact person = Kuntz R
| contact person = Kuntz R F
| case reference number = EPID L-2018-LLA-0726
| case reference number = EPID L-2018-LLA-0726
| document type = Letter
| document type = Letter

Revision as of 04:07, 14 June 2019

Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure for Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2
ML19015A017
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 01/28/2019
From: Robert Kuntz
Plant Licensing Branch III
To: Lies Q
Indiana Michigan Power Co
Kuntz R F
References
EPID L-2018-LLA-0726
Download: ML19015A017 (4)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON , D.C. 20555-0001 Mr. Q. Shane Lies Site Vice President Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group One Cook Place Bridgman, Ml 49106 January 28, 2019

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE FOR DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 (EPID L-2018-LLA-0726)

Dear Mr. Lies:

By letter dated November 20, 2018, you submitted affidavits dated January 15, 2018, January 17, 2018, and September 14, 2018, executed by James A. Gresham and Edmond J. Mercier, Westinghouse Electric Company LLC., requesting that the information contained in the following documents be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 2, Section 2.390: WCAP-18295-P, Revision 0, "Technical Justification for Eliminating Accumulator Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2, Using Break Methodology" (Proprietary)

WCAP-18302-P, Revision 0, "Technical Justification for Eliminating Residual Heat . Removal Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2, Using Leak-Before-Break Methodology" (Proprietary)

WCAP-18309-P, Revision 0, "Technical Justification for Eliminating Safety Injection Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units I and 2, Using Break Methodology" (Proprietary)

WCAP-18394-P, Revision 1, "Fatigue Crack Growth Evaluations of D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2 RHR., Accumulator, and Safety Injection Lines Supporting Expanded Scope Before-Break" (Proprietary)

LTR-SDA-11-18-41-P, Revision 1, "Responses to NRC Question on the Expanded Scope Leak-Before-Break Evaluations for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2" (Proprietary)

The affidavit stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons: * (a) The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of Q. Lies Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies. (b) It consists of supporting data , including test data, relative to a process (or component , structure , tool , method , etc.), the application of which data secures a competitive economic advantage (e.g., by optimization or improved marketability). (c) Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design , manufacture , shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product. (d) It reveals cost or price information, production capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of Westinghouse , its customers or suppliers. (e) It reveals aspects of past , present , or future Westinghouse or customer funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Westinghouse. (f) It contains patentable ideas , for which patent protection may be desirable.

We have reviewed your application and the material in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 and, on the basis of the statements in the affidavit, have determined that the submitted information sought to be withheld contains proprietary commercial information and should be withheld from public disclosure.

Therefore, WCAP-18295-P, Revision 0 , "Technical Justification for Eliminating Accumulator Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2, Using Leak-Before-Break Methodology" (Proprietary), WCAP-18302-P , Revision 0, "Technica l' Justification for Eliminating Residual Heat Removal Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2, Using Leak-Before-Break Methodology" (Proprietary), WCAP-18309-P, Revision 0, "Technical Justification for Eliminating Safety Injection Line Rupture as the Structural Design Basis for D.C. Cook Units I and 2, Using Leak-Before-Break Methodology" (Proprietary), WCAP-18394-P , Revision 1, "Fatigue Crack Growth Evaluations of D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2 RHR., Accumulator, and Safety Injection Lines Supporting Expanded Scope Break" (Proprietary), and L TR-SDA-11-18-41-P, Revision 1 , "Responses to NRC Question on the Expanded Scope Leak-Before-Break Evaluations for D.C. Cook Units 1 and 2" (Proprietary), will be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390(b)(5) and Section 103(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 , as amended. Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents. If the need arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in this area. We will, of course , ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information.

If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). You also should understand that Q. Lies the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example , if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information. In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above. You will be notified in advance of any public disclosure. If you have any questions regarding this matter , I may be reached at 301-415-3733. Sincerely, . Docket Nos.: 50-315 and 50-316 cc: Listserv Q.Ues

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE FOR DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT , UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 (EPID L-2018-LLA-0726)

DATED JANUARY 28 , 2019 DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC RidsACRS_MailCTR Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl3 Resource RidsNrrLASRohrer Resource RidsNrrDssScpb Resource RidsNrrDmlrMphb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource RidsRgn3MailCenter Resource ADAMS Accession No. ML 19015A017 OFFICE DORL/LPL3/PM DORL/LPL3/LA NAME RKuntz SRohrer DATE 1/11/19 1/15/19 OFFICE DSS/SCPB/BC DORL/LPL3/BC NAME SAnderson* DWrona DATE 1/16/19 1/28/19 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY * -via e-mail DMLR/MPHB/BC SRuffin* 1/24/19 DORL/LPL3/PM RKuntz 1/28/19