ML20247G511 - Revision history

StriderTol: StriderTol Bot change

2024-12-02T01:37:40Z

StriderTol Bot change

StriderTol: StriderTol Bot change

2021-03-16T20:30:01Z

StriderTol Bot change

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:30, 16 March 2021
Line 2:		Line 2:
	\| number = ML20247G511		\| number = ML20247G511
	\| issue date = 05/12/1998		\| issue date = 05/12/1998
	\| title = Ack Receipt of ~~980416 Ltr~~ to Chairman Jackson Re Industry Perspective on How Implementation of 10CRF50.59 & 10CFR50.71(e) Could Be Improved & Request for Opportunity to Brief Commission in Near Future on Subj Matters		\| title = Ack Receipt of to Chairman Jackson Re Industry Perspective on How Implementation of 10CRF50.59 & 10CFR50.71(e) Could Be Improved & Request for Opportunity to Brief Commission in Near Future on Subj Matters
	\| author name = Collins S		\| author name = Collins S
	\| author affiliation = NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)		\| author affiliation = NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
Line 12:		Line 12:
	\| case reference number = PROJECT-689		\| case reference number = PROJECT-689
	\| document report number = FACA, NUDOCS 9805200271		\| document report number = FACA, NUDOCS 9805200271
			\| title reference date = 04-16-1998
	\| package number = ML20247G516		\| package number = ML20247G516
	\| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE		\| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE

StriderTol: StriderTol Bot change

2021-03-08T23:59:21Z

StriderTol Bot change

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:59, 8 March 2021
Line 29:		Line 29:
	==Dear Mr. Beedle:==		==Dear Mr. Beedle:==

	In a letter dated April 16,1998, to Chairman Jackson of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, you provided an industry perspective on how the implementation of 10 CFR -		In a {{letter dated\|date=April 16, 1998\|text=letter dated April 16,1998}}, to Chairman Jackson of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, you provided an industry perspective on how the implementation of 10 CFR -
	50.59 and 10 CFR 50.71(e) could be improved and requested an opportunity to brief the Commission in the near future on these matters. -You further indicated a concern that publication for public comment of the staff-proposed generic letter on final safety analysis		50.59 and 10 CFR 50.71(e) could be improved and requested an opportunity to brief the Commission in the near future on these matters. -You further indicated a concern that publication for public comment of the staff-proposed generic letter on final safety analysis
	. report (FSAR) updates would preempt consideration of your recommendations on improving the focus of 10 CFR 50.59.		. report (FSAR) updates would preempt consideration of your recommendations on improving the focus of 10 CFR 50.59.
Line 60:		Line 60:
	==Dear Mr. Beedle:==		==Dear Mr. Beedle:==

	In a letter dated April 16,1998, to Chairman Jackson of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, you provided an industry perspective on how the implementation of 10 CFR 50.59 l and 10 CFR 50.71(e) could be improved and requested an opportunity to brief the Commission in the near future on these matters. You further indicated a concern that publication for public comment of the staff-proposed generic letter on final safety analysis report (FSAR) updates would preempt consideration of your recommendations on improving the focus of 10 CFR 50.59.		In a {{letter dated\|date=April 16, 1998\|text=letter dated April 16,1998}}, to Chairman Jackson of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, you provided an industry perspective on how the implementation of 10 CFR 50.59 l and 10 CFR 50.71(e) could be improved and requested an opportunity to brief the Commission in the near future on these matters. You further indicated a concern that publication for public comment of the staff-proposed generic letter on final safety analysis report (FSAR) updates would preempt consideration of your recommendations on improving the focus of 10 CFR 50.59.
	I am responding to your letter on behalf of the Commission. The Commission has indicated that it would be amenable to publicly meeting with NEl and other interested stakeholder to discuss these matters. To support such a meeting, the Commission has directed that the draft generic letter be made publicly available so that all etakeholders can have the benefit of understanding the staff's views and the opportunity to provide their views to the Commission on l the proposed FSAR guidance. The Office of the Secretary of the Commission will be in contact with you to arrange the time and date of this briefing.		I am responding to your letter on behalf of the Commission. The Commission has indicated that it would be amenable to publicly meeting with NEl and other interested stakeholder to discuss these matters. To support such a meeting, the Commission has directed that the draft generic letter be made publicly available so that all etakeholders can have the benefit of understanding the staff's views and the opportunity to provide their views to the Commission on l the proposed FSAR guidance. The Office of the Secretary of the Commission will be in contact with you to arrange the time and date of this briefing.
	Sincerely, ector Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation l		Sincerely, ector Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation l

StriderTol: StriderTol Bot insert

2021-02-11T03:21:29Z

StriderTol Bot insert

New page

{{Adams
| number = ML20247G511
| issue date = 05/12/1998
| title = Ack Receipt of 980416 Ltr to Chairman Jackson Re Industry Perspective on How Implementation of 10CRF50.59 & 10CFR50.71(e) Could Be Improved & Request for Opportunity to Brief Commission in Near Future on Subj Matters
| author name = Collins S
| author affiliation = NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
| addressee name = Beedle R
| addressee affiliation = NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE (FORMERLY NUCLEAR MGMT &
| docket =
| license number =
| contact person =
| case reference number = PROJECT-689
| document report number = FACA, NUDOCS 9805200271
| package number = ML20247G516
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 6
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:. - _ - _ _ _
, ' May 12,1998-Mr. Ralph Beedle, Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Nuclear Energy Institute '
1776 i Street, NW, Suite 400
. Washington D.C.. 20006-3708

==SUBJECT:==
10 CFR 50.59 SAFETY EVALUATIONS AND 10 CFR 50.71(e) FINAL SAFETY .
! ANALYSIS REPORT UPDATES ,

==Dear Mr. Beedle:==

In a letter dated April 16,1998, to Chairman Jackson of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, you provided an industry perspective on how the implementation of 10 CFR -
50.59 and 10 CFR 50.71(e) could be improved and requested an opportunity to brief the Commission in the near future on these matters. -You further indicated a concern that publication for public comment of the staff-proposed generic letter on final safety analysis
. report (FSAR) updates would preempt consideration of your recommendations on improving the focus of 10 CFR 50.59.
I am responding to your letter on behalf of the Commission. The Commission has indicated that it would be amenable to publicly meeting with NEl and other interested stakeholder to l~ discuss these matteis. To support such a meeting, the Commission has directed that th? draft l- generic letter be made publicly available so that all stakeholder can have the benefit of
! understanding the staff's views and the opportunity to provide their views to the Commission l- . on the proposed FSAR guidance. The Office of the Secretary of the Commission will be in contact with you to arrange the time and date of this briefing.
l YdMby I SgnuelJ.COEnB
: l. Samuel J. Collins,' Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc: See next page Project No. 689 DISTRIBUTION See attached page DOCUMENT NAME: G:\gt980250 -
*See previous concurrence *See Previous Concurrences OFFICE - PGEB:DRPMK : TECH. EDITOR SC:PGEB:DRPM (A)BC:PGEB:DRPM L NAME EMcKenna:sw . BCalure* FAkstulewicz' TEssig*
l.
l DATE' 401/98 4/23/98 4/23/98 4/23/98 D;NRR
* d I-OFFICE (A)D:DRPM 4 - EDO OCM/SAJ o NAME JRoe- SCollins LJCallan f gy ,
DATE 493/98 4/27/98' 8/7/98 I//2/98 '
OFFICIAL OFFICE COPY h[l.
O
~ w 9905200271 990512
. tJ ge g W'en PDR REYOP ERONUMtC:;
PDR u
/

i e
Q 5tQu gf % UNITED STATES j
j l '^ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
$k
* WASHINGTON D.C. 20066-0001
%%***** / May 12, 1998 Mr. Ralph Beedle, Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Nuclear Energy Institute 1776 i Street, NW, Suite 400 Washington D.C. 20006-3708

==SUBJECT:==
10 CFR 50.59 SAFETY EVALUATIONS AND 10 CFR 50.71(e) FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UPDATES

==Dear Mr. Beedle:==

In a letter dated April 16,1998, to Chairman Jackson of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, you provided an industry perspective on how the implementation of 10 CFR 50.59 l and 10 CFR 50.71(e) could be improved and requested an opportunity to brief the Commission in the near future on these matters. You further indicated a concern that publication for public comment of the staff-proposed generic letter on final safety analysis report (FSAR) updates would preempt consideration of your recommendations on improving the focus of 10 CFR 50.59.
I am responding to your letter on behalf of the Commission. The Commission has indicated that it would be amenable to publicly meeting with NEl and other interested stakeholder to discuss these matters. To support such a meeting, the Commission has directed that the draft generic letter be made publicly available so that all etakeholders can have the benefit of understanding the staff's views and the opportunity to provide their views to the Commission on l the proposed FSAR guidance. The Office of the Secretary of the Commission will be in contact with you to arrange the time and date of this briefing.
Sincerely, ector Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation l
l cc: See next page Project No. 689 n i

d Nuclear Energy Institute Project No. 689 cc: Mr. Alex Marion, Director Prograrns Nuclear Energy Institute Suite 400 1776 i Street, NW ;
Washington, DC 20006-3708 Mr. David Modeen, Director Engineering Nuclear Energy Institute Suite 400 17761 Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-3708 Mr. Anthony Pietrangelo, Director Licensing Nuclear Energy institute Suite 400 1776 l Street. NW Washington, DC 20006-3708 Mr. Nicholas J. Liparuto, Manager Nuclear Safety and Regulatory Activities Nuclear and Advanced Technology Division Westinghouse Electric Corporation P.O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 Mr. Jim Davis, Director Operations Nuclear Energy Institute Suite 400 1776 i Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-3708 Ms. Lynnette Hendricks, Director Plant Support Nuclear Energy Institute Suite 400 1776 i Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-3708 l

d*
DISTRIBUTION: Green Ticket 980250 Dated May 12, 1998 EDO R/F (G980250)
NRR n4AILROQM (w/ incoming)(G980250)
PUBLIC (w/ incoming)
PGEB R/F (w/ incoming)(GT980250)
LJCallan <
HThompson, Jr.
AThadani PNorry JBlaha~
GTracy KCyr SBums ACRS SCollins
, FMiraglia ,
BBoger BSheron
' FGi'lespie -
WTravers JRoe DMatthews TEssig FAkstulewicz EMcKenna SMagruder MClark, (G980250) l 1
l l.
l l
l l
1

Q~' ACTION 9
E EDO Principal Correspondence Control TROM: DUE: 05/01/98 EDO CONTROL: G980250 l i
DOC DT: 04/16/98 l FINAL REPLY:
jR21ph E. Beedle lEuclOOr Energy Institute (NEI) l 'TO :
Chairman Jackson
'FOR SIGNATURE OF : ** GRN ** CRC NO: 98-0351 I Collins, NRR 1 DESC: ROUTING:
10 CFR 50.59 SAFETY EVALUATIONS AND Callan l 10 CFR 50.71(e) FSAR UPDATES Thadani Thompson Norry ,
Blaha i Burns
'.DATE: 04/21/98 Cyr, OGC i ASSIGNED TO: CONTACT:
_ NRR Collins SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS:
d?EDOand13hairmanwWormee y aTrash3NcphceheJganiMty
_tchf NRR ACTION: DRPM: Roe l
NRR RECEIVED: April 22, 1998 ACTION l NRR RouTINs: Collins /Miragita DUE TO NRR DIRECTOR'S OFFICE Boger Sheron Travers BY fgg Roe l I Zimmerman NRR Mailroom h

I C ,. .. ..
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
, CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET PAPER NUMBER: CRC-98-0351 LOGGING DATE: Apr 20 98
! ACTION OFFICE: EDO l AUTHOR: RALPH BEEDLE AFFILIATION: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ADDRESSEE: CHAIRMAN JACKSON LETTER DATE: Apr 16 98 FILE CODE: IDR-14 PT 50

==SUBJECT:==
10 CFR 50.59 SAFETY EVALUATIONS AND 10 CFR 50.71 (e) FSAR UPDATES ACTION: Direct Reply DISTRIBUTION: CHAIRMAN f [-f SPECIAL HANDLING: SECY TO ACK po nd 3go u[ 7C Wi
~
- I #M '
' CONSTITUENT:
NOTES: OCM #12861 (CHAIRMAN SHOULD REVIEW RESPONSE PRIOR TO DISPATCH)
DATE DUE: May 5 98 SIGNATURE: . DATE SIGNED:
AFFILIATION:
l EDO -- G980250
_ _ __ - _ _ ___-_-____-__-_ _ _ _ ____ _ ___-_ - - _____ - _-_ - --_-_______-__-__ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ b}}