ML19210D907 - Revision history

StriderTol: StriderTol Bot change

2025-01-05T01:57:07Z

StriderTol Bot change

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:57, 4 January 2025
Line 2:		Line 2:
	\| number = ML19210D907		\| number = ML19210D907
	\| issue date = 11/19/1979		\| issue date = 11/19/1979
	\| title = Forwards Responses to Noncompliance Noted in NRC ~~791026 Ltr~~ Re Unauthorized Passage Into Protected Area.Remission of Fine Should Be Granted Due to Extenuating Circumstances. Responses Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)		\| title = Forwards Responses to Noncompliance Noted in NRC Re Unauthorized Passage Into Protected Area.Remission of Fine Should Be Granted Due to Extenuating Circumstances. Responses Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
	\| author name = Andognini G		\| author name = Andognini G
	\| author affiliation = BOSTON EDISON CO.		\| author affiliation = BOSTON EDISON CO.
Line 11:		Line 11:
	\| contact person =		\| contact person =
	\| document report number = 79-240, NUDOCS 7911280403		\| document report number = 79-240, NUDOCS 7911280403
			\| title reference date = 10-26-1979
	\| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC		\| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
	\| page count = 2		\| page count = 2
Line 16:		Line 17:

	=Text=		=Text=
	{{#Wiki_filter:.= * -		{{#Wiki_filter:* -
	BOSTON EoisuN COMPANY GENERAL OFFicts 800 BayLsTON STREET BOSTON. M ASS ACHUBETTE 02199 G. CA% ANDOGNINI SU,ERINTENDENT NuctE A. O,ER ATioN. oE,A T E"' November 19, 1979 BECo. Ltr. #79-240 Mr. Victor Stello, Jr.		.=
	Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 License No. DPR-35 Docket No. 50-293		BOSTON EoisuN COMPANY GENERAL OFFicts 800 BayLsTON STREET BOSTON. M ASS ACHUBETTE 02199 G. CA% ANDOGNINI SU,ERINTENDENT NuctE A. O,ER ATioN. oE,A T E"'
			November 19, 1979 BECo. Ltr. #79-240 Mr. Victor Stello, Jr.
			Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
			20555 License No. DPR-35 Docket No. 50-293

	==Dear Sir:==		==Dear Sir:==
			This letter is in response to your {{letter dated\|date=October 26, 1979\|text=October 26, 1979 letter}}, received by us on October 29, 1979, which identifies an item of non-compliance in allowing an unauthorized indivi-dual to pass undett ". d into the protected a ea and sub-sequently into a v:_ 2 aiea at Boston Edison's Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station on t:~
	This letter is in response to your October 26, 1979 letter, received by us on October 29, 1979, which identifies an item of non-compliance in allowing an unauthorized indivi-dual to pass undett ". d into the protected a ea and sub-sequently into a v:_ 2 aiea at Boston Edison's Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station on t:~ inorning of July ll, 1979.		inorning of July ll, 1979.
	Appendix A to your October 26, 1979 letter, " Notice of Violation", identifies a certain activi.ty as an apparent item of non-compliance with NRC regulatory requirements and the Pilgrim Station Modified Amended Security Plan. Our response to the Notice of Violation is submitted as Attachment A to this letter pursuant to the terms of the Notice and Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice", Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations. As requested in your letter, included in Attachment A are the specific corrective actions initiated for the purpose of preventing future non-compliance.		Appendix A to your {{letter dated\|date=October 26, 1979\|text=October 26, 1979 letter}}, " Notice of Violation", identifies a certain activi.ty as an apparent item of non-compliance with NRC regulatory requirements and the Pilgrim Station Modified Amended Security Plan.
	Appendix B to your October 26, 1979 letter proposes to impose civil penalties in the amount of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) for the apparent item of non-compliance iderntified in Appendix A. Our response to the Notice of Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalties is submitted as Attachment B to this letter pursuant to the terms of the Notice and Section 2.205 of the NRC's		Our response to the Notice of Violation is submitted as Attachment A to this letter pursuant to the terms of the Notice and Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice", Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations.
	" Rules of Practice", Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regula-tions.		As requested in your letter, included in Attachment A are the specific corrective actions initiated for the purpose of preventing future non-compliance.
			Appendix B to your {{letter dated\|date=October 26, 1979\|text=October 26, 1979 letter}} proposes to impose civil penalties in the amount of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) for the apparent item of non-compliance iderntified in Appendix A.
			Our response to the Notice of Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalties is submitted as Attachment B to this letter pursuant to the terms of the Notice and Section 2.205 of the NRC's
			" Rules of Practice", Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regula-tions.
	The matters identified in your October 26 letter have received attention at the highest levels of Boston Edison management.		The matters identified in your October 26 letter have received attention at the highest levels of Boston Edison management.
	We wish to assure you that the Company is strongly committed to maintaining a high level of security at Pilgrim Station to fully protect the public health and safety. N 4)		We wish to assure you that the Company is strongly committed to maintaining a high level of security at Pilgrim Station to fully protect the public health and safety.
	Y*hf 7911280 3 @d		N 4)
	.c4		Y*hf 7911280 3
			@d.c4

	As noted in Appendix B to the letter, we respectfully request that your office consider remission of the $5,000 fine in light of the extenuating circumstances described in Appendix B.		As noted in Appendix B to the letter, we respectfully request that your office consider remission of the $5,000 fine in light of the extenuating circumstances described in Appendix B.
	Pursuant to Section 2.790(d) of 10 CFR Part 2, we are with-holding the information provided in Attachments A & B of this letter from public inspection. Withholding from public inspec-tion does not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned with the project to inspect the infor-mation.		Pursuant to Section 2.790(d) of 10 CFR Part 2, we are with-holding the information provided in Attachments A & B of this letter from public inspection.
			Withholding from public inspec-tion does not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned with the project to inspect the infor-mation.
	We will be pleased to answer any further questions you may have and to work with you to assure that your concerns are met.		We will be pleased to answer any further questions you may have and to work with you to assure that your concerns are met.
	Very truly yours,		Very truly yours,
	. ~ - i		. ~ -
	~		i
	/ ' !/ ' / tb N!'fL l'		' ! ' / tb N!'fL
	G. Carl Andognini		~
			/
			/
			l' G.
			Carl Andognini

	==Enclosures:==		==Enclosures:==

	Attachment A: Response to Notice of Violation Attachment B: Response to Notice of Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalties		Attachment A: Response to Notice of Violation Attachment B: Response to Notice of Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalties
	/pms 1A02 hb}}		/pms 1A02 hb}}

StriderTol: Created page by program invented by StriderTol

2020-02-02T09:13:04Z

Created page by program invented by StriderTol

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:13, 2 February 2020
Line 17:		Line 17:
	=Text=		=Text=
	{{#Wiki_filter:.= * -		{{#Wiki_filter:.= * -
	,		BOSTON EoisuN COMPANY GENERAL OFFicts 800 BayLsTON STREET BOSTON. M ASS ACHUBETTE 02199 G. CA% ANDOGNINI SU,ERINTENDENT NuctE A. O,ER ATioN. oE,A T E"' November 19, 1979 BECo. Ltr. #79-240 Mr. Victor Stello, Jr.
	BOSTON EoisuN COMPANY GENERAL OFFicts 800 BayLsTON STREET BOSTON. M ASS ACHUBETTE 02199 G. CA% ANDOGNINI SU,ERINTENDENT NuctE A. O,ER ATioN. oE,A T E"' November 19, 1979 BECo. Ltr. #79-240
	-
	Mr. Victor Stello, Jr.
	Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 License No. DPR-35 Docket No. 50-293		Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 License No. DPR-35 Docket No. 50-293

Line 34:		Line 31:
	.c4		.c4

	.
	,
	,
	As noted in Appendix B to the letter, we respectfully request that your office consider remission of the $5,000 fine in light of the extenuating circumstances described in Appendix B.		As noted in Appendix B to the letter, we respectfully request that your office consider remission of the $5,000 fine in light of the extenuating circumstances described in Appendix B.
	Pursuant to Section 2.790(d) of 10 CFR Part 2, we are with-holding the information provided in Attachments A & B of this letter from public inspection. Withholding from public inspec-tion does not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned with the project to inspect the infor-mation.		Pursuant to Section 2.790(d) of 10 CFR Part 2, we are with-holding the information provided in Attachments A & B of this letter from public inspection. Withholding from public inspec-tion does not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned with the project to inspect the infor-mation.

StriderTol: Created page by program invented by StriderTol

2019-10-19T17:30:14Z

Created page by program invented by StriderTol

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:30, 19 October 2019
Line 16:		Line 16:

	=Text=		=Text=
	{{#Wiki_filter:* -.=, BOSTON EoisuN COMPANY GENERAL OFFicts 800 BayLsTON STREET BOSTON. M ASS ACHUBETTE 02199 G. CA% ANDOGNINI SU,ERINTENDENT NuctE A. O,ER ATioN. oE,A T E"'November 19, 1979 BECo. Ltr. #79-240 Mr. Victor Stello, Jr.		{{#Wiki_filter:.= * -
	-Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555 License No. DPR-35 Docket No. 50-293		,
			BOSTON EoisuN COMPANY GENERAL OFFicts 800 BayLsTON STREET BOSTON. M ASS ACHUBETTE 02199 G. CA% ANDOGNINI SU,ERINTENDENT NuctE A. O,ER ATioN. oE,A T E"' November 19, 1979 BECo. Ltr. #79-240
			-
			Mr. Victor Stello, Jr.
			Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 License No. DPR-35 Docket No. 50-293

	==Dear Sir:==		==Dear Sir:==
	This letter is in response to your October 26, 1979 letter, received by us on October 29, 1979, which identifies an item of non-compliance in allowing an unauthorized indivi-dual to pass undett ". d into the protected a ea and sub-sequently into a v:_ 2 aiea at Boston Edison's Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station on t:~
	inorning of July ll, 1979.		This letter is in response to your October 26, 1979 letter, received by us on October 29, 1979, which identifies an item of non-compliance in allowing an unauthorized indivi-dual to pass undett ". d into the protected a ea and sub-sequently into a v:_ 2 aiea at Boston Edison's Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station on t:~ inorning of July ll, 1979.
	Appendix A to your October 26, 1979 letter, " Notice of Violation", identifies a certain activi.ty as an apparent item of non-compliance with NRC regulatory requirements and the Pilgrim Station Modified Amended Security Plan.		Appendix A to your October 26, 1979 letter, " Notice of Violation", identifies a certain activi.ty as an apparent item of non-compliance with NRC regulatory requirements and the Pilgrim Station Modified Amended Security Plan. Our response to the Notice of Violation is submitted as Attachment A to this letter pursuant to the terms of the Notice and Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice", Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations. As requested in your letter, included in Attachment A are the specific corrective actions initiated for the purpose of preventing future non-compliance.
	Our response to the Notice of Violation is submitted as Attachment A to this letter pursuant to the terms of the Notice and Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice", Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations.		Appendix B to your October 26, 1979 letter proposes to impose civil penalties in the amount of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) for the apparent item of non-compliance iderntified in Appendix A. Our response to the Notice of Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalties is submitted as Attachment B to this letter pursuant to the terms of the Notice and Section 2.205 of the NRC's
	As requested in your letter, included in Attachment A are the specific corrective actions initiated for the purpose of preventing future non-compliance.		" Rules of Practice", Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regula-tions.
	Appendix B to your October 26, 1979 letter proposes to impose civil penalties in the amount of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) for the apparent item of non-compliance iderntified in Appendix A.Our response to the Notice of Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalties is submitted as Attachment B to this letter pursuant to the terms of the Notice and Section 2.205 of the NRC's" Rules of Practice", Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regula-tions.The matters identified in your October 26 letter have received attention at the highest levels of Boston Edison management.		The matters identified in your October 26 letter have received attention at the highest levels of Boston Edison management.
	We wish to assure you that the Company is strongly committed to maintaining a high level of security at Pilgrim Station to fully protect the public health and safety.		We wish to assure you that the Company is strongly committed to maintaining a high level of security at Pilgrim Station to fully protect the public health and safety. N 4)
	N 4)Y*hf 7911280 3@d.c4		Y*hf 7911280 3 @d
	,~~.-2-~~, As noted in Appendix B to the letter, we respectfully request that your office consider remission of the $5,000 fine in light of the extenuating circumstances described in Appendix B.Pursuant to Section 2.790(d) of 10 CFR Part 2, we are with-holding the information provided in Attachments A & B of this letter from public inspection.		.c4
	Withholding from public inspec-tion does not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned with the project to inspect the infor-mation.We will be pleased to answer any further questions you may have and to work with you to assure that your concerns are met.Very truly yours,. ~ -i' ! ' / tb N!'fL
	~~~//~~l'G.Carl Andognini		.
			,
			,
			As noted in Appendix B to the letter, we respectfully request that your office consider remission of the $5,000 fine in light of the extenuating circumstances described in Appendix B.
			Pursuant to Section 2.790(d) of 10 CFR Part 2, we are with-holding the information provided in Attachments A & B of this letter from public inspection. Withholding from public inspec-tion does not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned with the project to inspect the infor-mation.
			We will be pleased to answer any further questions you may have and to work with you to assure that your concerns are met.
			Very truly yours,
			. ~ - i
			~
			/ ' !/ ' / tb N!'fL l'
			G. Carl Andognini

	==Enclosures:==		==Enclosures:==

	Attachment A: Response to Notice of Violation Attachment B: Response to Notice of Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalties		Attachment A: Response to Notice of Violation Attachment B: Response to Notice of Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalties
	/pms 1A02 hb}}		/pms 1A02 hb}}

StriderTol: Created page by program invented by StriderTol

2019-08-15T06:49:24Z

Created page by program invented by StriderTol

New page

{{Adams
| number = ML19210D907
| issue date = 11/19/1979
| title = Forwards Responses to Noncompliance Noted in NRC 791026 Ltr Re Unauthorized Passage Into Protected Area.Remission of Fine Should Be Granted Due to Extenuating Circumstances. Responses Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
| author name = Andognini G
| author affiliation = BOSTON EDISON CO.
| addressee name = Stello V
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
| docket = 05000293
| license number =
| contact person =
| document report number = 79-240, NUDOCS 7911280403
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 2
}}

=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:* -.=, BOSTON EoisuN COMPANY GENERAL OFFicts 800 BayLsTON STREET BOSTON. M ASS ACHUBETTE 02199 G. CA% ANDOGNINI SU,ERINTENDENT NuctE A. O,ER ATioN. oE,A T E"'November 19, 1979 BECo. Ltr. #79-240 Mr. Victor Stello, Jr.
-Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555 License No. DPR-35 Docket No. 50-293

==Dear Sir:==
This letter is in response to your October 26, 1979 letter, received by us on October 29, 1979, which identifies an item of non-compliance in allowing an unauthorized indivi-dual to pass undett ". d into the protected a ea and sub-sequently into a v:_ 2 aiea at Boston Edison's Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station on t:~
inorning of July ll, 1979.
Appendix A to your October 26, 1979 letter, " Notice of Violation", identifies a certain activi.ty as an apparent item of non-compliance with NRC regulatory requirements and the Pilgrim Station Modified Amended Security Plan.
Our response to the Notice of Violation is submitted as Attachment A to this letter pursuant to the terms of the Notice and Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice", Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations.
As requested in your letter, included in Attachment A are the specific corrective actions initiated for the purpose of preventing future non-compliance.
Appendix B to your October 26, 1979 letter proposes to impose civil penalties in the amount of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) for the apparent item of non-compliance iderntified in Appendix A.Our response to the Notice of Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalties is submitted as Attachment B to this letter pursuant to the terms of the Notice and Section 2.205 of the NRC's" Rules of Practice", Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regula-tions.The matters identified in your October 26 letter have received attention at the highest levels of Boston Edison management.
We wish to assure you that the Company is strongly committed to maintaining a high level of security at Pilgrim Station to fully protect the public health and safety.
N 4)Y*hf 7911280 3@d.c4
,.-2-, As noted in Appendix B to the letter, we respectfully request that your office consider remission of the $5,000 fine in light of the extenuating circumstances described in Appendix B.Pursuant to Section 2.790(d) of 10 CFR Part 2, we are with-holding the information provided in Attachments A & B of this letter from public inspection.
Withholding from public inspec-tion does not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned with the project to inspect the infor-mation.We will be pleased to answer any further questions you may have and to work with you to assure that your concerns are met.Very truly yours,. ~ -i' ! ' / tb N!'fL
~//l'G.Carl Andognini

==Enclosures:==

Attachment A: Response to Notice of Violation Attachment B: Response to Notice of Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalties
/pms 1A02 hb}}