Text

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report
	ML24122A114
Person / Time
Site:	Callaway
Issue date:	04/30/2024
From:	; Ameren Missouri, Union Electric Co
To:	; Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML24122A112	List: ML24122A113; ULNRC-06868, Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report;
References
	ULNRC-06868
	Download: ML24122A114 (1)
	v • d • e

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Renewed Facility Operating License NPF-30 Docket Numbers 50-483 and 72-1045

1. Introduction This Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report (ARERR) is submitted by Union Electric Co., dba Ameren Missouri, in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.36a and 10 CFR 72.44(d)(3), Callaway Energy Center Technical Specification 5.6.3, and HI-STORM UMAX Certificate of Compliance Appendix A, Section 5.1.c. This report is for the period January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023.

The doses to the Member of the Public from all liquid and gaseous effluents discharged during the reporting period were small fractions ofthe NRC and EPA regulatory limits and the Radioactive Effluent Control limits in the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual.

Abstract The Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report covers the operation of the Callaway Energy Center during the year 2023. The report includes a summary of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste released from the unit. The report also includes an annual summary of hourly meteorological data collected during the year and an assessment of radiation dose to the Member ofthe Public from liquid and gaseous effluents.

[

]

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Radionuclide concentrations in liquid and gaseous effluents were obtained by effluent sampling and radiological analysis in accordance with the requirements of FSAR-SP/ODCM Radiological Effluent Control (REC) Table 16.11-1 and Table 16.11-4.

Gamma spectroscopy was the primary analysis technique used to determine the radionuclide composition and concentration of liquid and gaseous effluents.

Composite samples were analyzed for the hard to detect nuclides by an independent laboratory. Tritium and gross alpha were measured for both liquid and gaseous effluents using liquid scintillation counting and gas flow proportional counting techniques, respectively. The total radioactivity in effluent releases was determined from the measured concentrations of each radionuclide present and the total volume of effluents discharged.

2. Gaseous Effluents The quantity of radioactive material released in gaseous effluents during the reporting period is summarized in Table A-i. The quarterly and annual sums of all radionuclides discharged in gaseous effluents are reported in Tables A-iA and A-lB.

All gaseous effluent releases are considered to be ground level.

The quantity of 4C released in gaseous effluents was calculated as described in EPRI Technical Report 1021106.

There were no radioactive effluents from the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI). The HI-STORM UMAX Canister Storage System does not create any radioactive materials or have any radioactive waste treatment systems.

Specification 3.1.1, Multi-Purpose Canister (MPC), provides assurance that there are no radioactive effluents from the ISFSI.2

3. Liquid Effluents The quantity of radioactive material released in liquid effluents during the reporting period is summarized in Table A-2. The quarterly and annual sums of all radionuclides discharged in liquid effluents are reported in Table A-2A. All liquid effluents were discharged in batch mode; there were no continuous liquid 1 Estimation ofCarbon-14 in Nuclear Power Plant Gaseous Effluents, Technical Report 1021106, Electric Power Research Institute, December, 2010.

2 Certificate of Compliance No. 1040, Appendix A, Technical Specifications for the HI_STORM UMAX Canister Storage System, Specification 5.1.

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report discharges for the reporting period. Dilution by the Missouri River, in the form of the near-field dilution factor, is utilized in the ODCM dose calculation methodology.

4. Solid Waste Storage and Shipments The volume and activity of solid waste shipped for disposal is provided in Table A-3.

5. Dose Assessments The annual evaluation of dose to the Member of the Public is calculated in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM and is reported in Tables A-4 and A-5.

5.1 Table A-4, Dose Assessments, 10 CFR 50, Appendix I The dose assessments reported in Table A-4 were calculated using the methodology and parameters in the ODCM and demonstrate compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I. The gamma air dose and beta air dose were calculated at the nearest Site Boundary location with the highest value of X/Q, as described in the ODCM. The maximum organ dose from gaseous effluents was calculated for the ingestion, inhalation, and ground plane pathways at the location of the nearest resident with the highest value of D/Q, as described in the ODCM. The organ dose does not include the dose from 4C, which is listed separately.

5.2 Table A-5, EPA 40 CFR 190 Individual in the Unrestricted Area The dose assessments reported in Table A-S are the doses to the Member of the Public from activities within the Site Boundary plus the doses at the location of the Nearest Residence. A large portion of the residual land of the Callaway Site is managed by the State of Missouri Department of Conservation as the Reform Wildlife Management Area. Pursuant to the guidance provided in Regulatory Guide 1.21, rev.2, the dose reported in Table A-S is the sum ofthe dose from gaseous effluents (at the Nearest Resident location and within the Site Boundary), plus the dose contribution due to activities within the Site Boundary and the organ dose from inhalation of 4C (at the Nearest Resident location and within the Site Boundary).

The dose assessments in Table A-S demonstrate compliance with 10 CFR 20.1301(e) and 40 CFR 190.

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report

6. Supplemental Information 6.1 Abnormal Releases or Abnormal Discharges There were no abnormal releases during the reporting period.

6.2 Non-routine Planned Discharges There were no non-routine planned discharges during the reporting period.

6.3 Radioactive Waste Treatment System Changes There were no major changes to the liquid or gaseous radwaste treatment system during the reporting period.

6.4 Annual Land Use Census Changes There were no changes identified in the locations for dose calculation. Changes in sample locations identified in the Land Use Census are described in the Annual Radioactive Environmental Operating Report.

6.5 Effluent Monitoring System Non-functionality RF26 Rad Monitors (GH-RE-1OA/B, GT-RE-21A/B), Non-functional for PAO1 electrical bus outage 10/21/2023 18:44 to 10/22/2023 22:40. All ventilation was secured.

Refer to CR 202307803.

GT-RE-21A & GT-RE-21B were both 005 for 28 days from 02/16/2023 to 03/16/2023 due to Unit Vent Flow rate not reading correctly and extensive troubleshooting efforts (GTRE21A was placed on Alt C sample cart for the entire period and special report 2023-01 PAM Report was submitted 03/09/2023). Refer to CR 202301104.

GT-RE-22 was 005 for ISL-GT-00R22 from 05/02/2023 08:17 to 15:58. During this time, the opposite train monitor and sampler, GT-RE-33 was functional, and all requirements of the associated action statement were met. Refer to CR 202303077.

GT-RE-22 & GT-RE-33 incorrect setpoints and non-functional 09/12/2023 17:00 to 09/18/2023 15:40, according to CR 202306093 originally written. Investigation found: Therefore, the current as-found setpoints for GTREOO22/GTREOO33 are conservative and support the ODCM limits required by TS 3.3.6 Monitors are now considered operable.

GH-RE-1OB Heat Trace has been 005 for most of 2023. EOSL 24353 01/12/2023 08:00 to 11/21/2023 10:45, and EOSL 24836 effective 12/18/2023 into 2024. This

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report places more importance on maintaining GH-RE-1OA particulate and Iodine samplers operational. Refer to CR 202300301 and 202309230.

6.6 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Changes The Offsite Dose Calculation Manual consists of two documents: APA-ZZ-01003, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (contains Methodology and Parameters) and FSAR-SP Chapter 16.11, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Radiological Effluent Controls (RECs).

APA-ZZ-01003 was revised in June 2021. A complete copy of APA-ZZ-01003, rev. 26 is attached to this report in Appendix C. A description of the changes is provided in Appendix B to APA-ZZ-01003.

The only change to FSAR 16.11 for 2023 is the removal of ACTION 16.11.2.3.b.,

which stated: The provisions olSections 16.0.1.3 and 16.0.1.4 are not applicable.

This has the effect of requiring the initiation of a condition report to document exceedances in the Corrective Action Program (CAP).

6.7 Process Control Program Changes APA-ZZ-01011, Process Control Program was revised during the reporting period.

Current revision is 017, effective 10/27/2023.

Page(s)

Section/Step #

Description I Summary of Changes Various Various Removed sections regarding Supplier Quality Audits: 3.3, 3.4, 4.1, 4.2, 5.6.1.e, 5.6.1.f, 5.6.3.d, 6.1.12 and 7.1.1 3

3.3 & 3.4 Added provisions for allowing a vendor to come on site and process potentially contaminated water, 4

5.1 Replaced annual with cyclic in NOTE at 5.1.

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 6.8 Corrections to Previous Reports There were no major changes or corrections to previous reports, during the reporting period.

6.9 Other Information Related to Radioactive Effluents Meteorological dispersion parameters, data recovery rate, and Joint Frequency Tables for the monitoring period are attached as Appendix B.

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Appendix A Tables of Quantities Released in Liquid and Gaseous Radioactive Effluents and in Solid Radioactive Waste Shipments Tables of Doses from the Discharge of Liquid and Gaseous Radioactive Effluents

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Table A-i: Gaseous Effluents-Summation ofAll Releases Summation of Estimated Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter All Releases Unit Total Uncertainty

(%)3 Fission &

Activation Ci 9.53E-02 7.29E-O1 3.31E+OO 3.90E-02

4. 17E+OO 20 Gases Average iCi/s 1.21E02 9.25E-02 4.20E-01 4.95E-03 1.32E-01 Release Rate

%ofLimit N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A lodine Ci ND*

ND*

N/A Average iCi/s N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Release Rate

%ofLimit N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Particulates Ci 8.78E-08 7.27E-08 ND*

ND*

161E-07 N/A Average iCi/s L11E-08 9.22E-09 N/A N/A 5.09E-09 Release Rate

%ofLimit N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A GrossAlpha Ci 1.68E-07 2.67E-07 L93E-07 1.61E-07 7.88E-07 3H Ci 6.54E+00 1.27E+01 1.39E+01 1.58E+01 4.89E+01 14 Average iCi/s 8.30E-01 L61E+00 1.76E+00 2.OOE+00 1.55E+00 Release Rate

%ofLimft N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A l44 Ci 2.81E+00 2.81E+00 2.81E+0O 2.81E+00 1.12E+01

ND means measurements were performed but no activity was detected.

3 Safety Analysis calculation 87-063-00, January 6, 1988 4 4C activity is estimated based on EPRI report TR-1021106, Estimation of4C in Nuclear Power Plant Effluents, December, 2010.

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Table A-lA: Gaseous Effluents-Ground Level Release-Batch Mode Fission &

Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total for Activation Units 1

2 3

4 theyear Gases 41Ar Ci 6.97E-02 6.02E-02 5.50E-02 2.60E-02 2.11E-O1 85Kr Ci 1.09E-03 ND*

ND*

6.85E-04 1.78E-03 131MXE Ci ND*

ND*

2.1OE-04 2.1OE-04 31XE Ci ND*

ND*

3.13E-03 3.13E-03 lodines &

Units Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total for Halogens 1

2 3

4 the year Ci ND*

ND*

Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total for Particulates Units 1

2 3

4 theyear Ci ND*

ND*

3H Ci 1.46E-O1 2.41E-O1 2.09E-O1 2.06E-02 6.16E-O1 Grossa Ci ND*

ND*

14c Ci 2.74E-02 2.74E-02 2.74E-02 2.74E-02 1.09E-O1

ND means measurements were performed but no activity was detected.

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Table A-1B: Gaseous Effluents

- Ground Level Release

- Continuous Mode Fission&

Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total for Activation Units 1

2 3

4 theyear Gases 41Ar Ci 2.45E-02 6.69E-O1 3.26E+OO 8.96E-03 3.96E+OO lodines &

Units Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total for Halogens 1

2 3

4 the year Ci ND*

ND*

Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total for Particulates Units 1

2 3

4 theyear 63N1 Ci 8.78E-08 7.27E-08 ND*

ND*

1.61E-07 3H Ci 6.40E+OO 1.25E+O1 1.36E+O1 1.58E+O1 4.83E+O1 Gross a Ci 1.68E-07 2.67E-07 1.93E-07 L61E-07 7.88E-07 4c Ci 2.78E+OO 2.78E+OO 2.78E+OO 2.78E+OO 1.11E+O1

ND means measurements were performed but no activity was detected.

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Table A-2: Liquid Effluents-Summation ofAll Releases Summation of All Liquid Unit Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total Estimated 1

2 3

4 Uncertaintyf%)

Releases Fission and Activation Ci 4.75E-03 2.70E-03 3.93E-03 1.69E-02 2.83E-02 20 Products6 Avg Diluted jiCi/

4.48E-08 1.55E-08 1.O1E-08 9.41E-08 3.32E-08 Conc ml

%ofLimit 3/4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 3H Ci 1.12E+02 4.32E+02 9.81E+02 2.87E+02 L81E+03 14 Avg Diluted tCi/

1.06E-03 2.48E-03 2.51E-03 1.60E-03 2.13E-03 Conc ml

%ofLimit N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dissolved &

Entrained Ci ND*

ND*

1.44E-03 3.79E-04 1.82E-03 27 Gases Avg Diluted iiCi/

ND*

3.69E-09 2.11E-09 2.14E-09 Conc ml

%ofLimit N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Grossa Ci 8.65E-05 ND*

ND*

2.83E-04 3.69E-04 29 Avg Diluted tCi/

8.15E-10 ND*

ND*

L57E-09 4.34E-10 Conc ml Vol Liquid Liters 2.92E+06 2.64E+06 6.06E+06 5.41E+06 1.70E+07 Effluent Dilution Liters 1.03E+08 1.72E+08 3.85E+08 1.74E+08 8.34E+08 Volume Avgnver m3/s 1.53E+03 1.43E+03 L53E+03 1.16E+03 1.41E+03 flow Time period hrs 6.8$E+01 1.15E+02 240E+02 1.18E+02 5.42E+02 for releases

ND means measurements were performed but no activity was detected.

5 Safety Analysis calculation 87-063-00, January 6, 1988 6 Excludes 3H, noble gases, and gross alpha.

7 Primary system liquid effluent plus secondary liquid effluent, prior to dilution.

8 Does not include Missouri River dilution.

9 Average Missouri River flow for the year at the Hermann, MO monitoring station as reported by the USGS.

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Table A-2A: Lii uid Effluents-Batch Mode Fission &

Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total for the Activation Units 1

2 3

4 year Products 51Cr Ci ND*

ND*

2.78E-04 2.78E-04 54Mn Ci 2.34E-06 ND*

ND*

L50E-05 L73E-05 58Co Ci 5.87E-04 8.75E-05 2.87E-06 3.71E-04 1.05E-03

°Co Ci 1.26E-03 5.25E-04 6.86E-04 1.02E-03 3.49E-03 63N1 Ci 1.13E-03 1.07E-03 2.63E-03 1.40E-03 6.23E-03 245b Ci ND*

ND*

2.74E-03 2.74E-03 255b Ci 1.28E-03 9.55E-04 5.97E-04 L1OE-02 1.38E-02 265b Ci ND*

ND*

6.50E-05 650E-05 37Cs Ci 4.93E-04 5.52E-05 1.23E-05 1.75E-05 5.78E-04 38Cs Ci ND*

ND*

3.30E-05 3.30E-05 Total Ci 4.75E-03 2.70E-03 3.93E-03 1.69E-02 2.$3E-02 Dissolved &

Units Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Total for the Entrained Gases 1

2 3

4 year 133Xe Ci ND*

ND*

1.44E-03 3.79E-04 1.82E-03 Total Ci ND*

ND*

1.44E-03 3.79E-04 1.82E-03 3H Ci 1.12E+02 4.32E÷02 9.81E+02 2.87E+02 1.81E+03 Gross a Ci 8.65E-05 ND*

ND*

2.83E-04 3.69 E-04

ND means measurements were performed but no activity was detected.

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Table A-3:

Low-Level Waste Shipped for 2023 Resins, Filters, And Evaporator Bottoms Volume Waste Class Cunes Shipped w

A 2.30E+02 6.51E+OO 1.92E+OO B

O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO C

O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO U nclassified O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO All 2.30E+02 6.51E+OO 1.92E+OO Major Nuclides for the Above Table:

H-3, C-14, Mn-54, Fe-55, Co-58, Co-60, Ni-63, Sr-90, Nb-94, Tc-99, Sb-125, -129, Cs-137, Pu-238, Pu-240, Pu-241, Am-241, Cm-242, Cm-244 Dry Active Waste (DAW)

Volume Waste Class Curios Shipped A

4.82E+03 1.36E+02 1.04E+OO B

O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO C

O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO U nclassified O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO All 4.82E+03 1.36E+02 1.04E+OO Major Nuclides for the Above Table: H-3, C-14, Cr-51, Mn-54, Fe-55, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Ni-63, Sr-90, Zr-95, Nb-95, Tc-99, Sb-125, -129, Cs-137, Pu-238, Pu-239, Pu-241, Am-241, Cm-242, Cm-244 irradiated Components Volume Waste Class Cudes Shipped ft3 A

O.OOE+OO O.OOE÷OO O.OOE+OO B

O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO C

O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO Unclassified O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO All O.OOE+OO OOOE+OO O.OOE+OO Major Nuclides for the Above Table: N/A

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Table A4: Low-Level Waste for 2023 (continued)

Other Waste Waste Class Volume Cudes Shipped ft2 A

2.17E+02 6.13E+OO 1.22E+OO B

O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO C

O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO U nclassified O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO All 2.17E+02 6.13E+OO L22E+OO Major Nuclides fortheAboveTable: H-3, C-14, Co-60, Tc-99, -129, Cs-137 Sum Of All Low-Level Waste Shipped From SIte Volume Waste Class Curles Shipped w

A 5.26E+03 1.49E+02 4.19E+OO B

O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO C

O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO Unclassified O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO All 5.26E+03 1.49E+02 4.19E+OO Major Nuclides for the Above Table:

H-3, C-14, Cr-51, Mn-54, Fe-55, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Ni-63, Sr-90, Zr-95, Nb-94, Nb-95, Tc-99, Sb-125, -129, Cs-137, Pu-238, Pu-239, Pu-240, Pu-241, Am-241, Cm-242, Cm-244 SOLIDIFICATION AGENT None used.

IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS (Disposition)

There were no shipments of irradiated fuel during the reporting period.

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Table A-4: Dose Assessments, 10 CFR 50, Appendix I Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Yearly 1

2 3

4 total Liquid Effluent Dose Limit,

. 5 1 5 1 5 3

Total Body (mrem)

Total Body Dose (mrem) 1.42E-03 8.68E-04 1.57E-03 5.34E-04 4.37E-03

% Limit 0.09%

0.06%

0.10%

0.04%

0.15%

Liquid Effluent Dose Limit, 5

5 5

10 Maximum Organ (mrem)

Maximum Organ Dose (mrem) 2.06E-03 9.49E-04 1.60E-03 5.66E-04 5.16E-03

% Limit 0.04%

0.02%

0.03%

0.01%

0.05%

Gaseous Effluent Dose Limit, 5

5 5

10 Gamma Air (mrad)

Gamma Air Dose (mrad) 2.67E-04 2.06E-03 9.37E-03 9.94E-05 1.1$E-02

% Limit 0.01%

0.04%

0.19%

0.00%

0.12%

Gaseous Effluent Dose Limit, 20 Beta Air (mrad)

Beta Air Dose (mrad) 9.46E-05 7.28E-04 3.30E-03 3.64E-05 4.16E-03

% Limit 0.00%

0.01%

0.03%

0.00%

0.02%

Gaseous Effluent Dose Limit, 7 5 7 5 7 5 15 Maximum Organ fmrem)

Maximum organ dose° 1.09E-02 2.12E-02 2.31E-02 2.64E-02 8.17E-02 (m rem)

% Limit 0.15%

0.28%

0.31%

0.35%

0.54%

C Maximum organ dose 3.51E-03 3.51E-03 3.51E-03 3.51E-03 1.40E-02 (mrem)1 10 Iodine, 3H, and particulates with greater than an 8 day half-life.

11 Not included in above totals

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Table A-5: EPA 40 CFR 190 Individual in the Unrestricted Area WholeBody Thyroid MaxOtherOrgan Dose Limit 25 mrem 75 mrem 25 mrem Dose 8.62E-02 8.62E-02 9.87E-02

% Limit 0.34%

0.11%

0.39%

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Appendix B Meteorological Dispersion Parameters and Joint Frequency Tables; Totals of Hours at Each Wind Speed & Direction for the period January 1, 2023-December 31, 2023

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Meteorological Dispersion Parameters for the Reporting Period Nearest Resident Dispersion Parameters Direction: NNW Distance: 2913 meters x/o%, Undecayed and Undepleted:

6.50E-06 x/Q Decayed and Undepleted:

5.70E-06 X/Q Decayed and Depleted:

5.20E-06 D/Q Deposition rate:

3.20E-09 Site Boundary Dispersion Parameters Direction: SSE Distance: 1400 meters x/Q, Undecayed and Undepleted:

1.00E05 X/Q Decayed and Undepleted:

9.60E06 x/Q Decayed and Depleted:

8.80E06 D/Q Deposition rate:

5.60E09 Meteorological Data Recovery Rate 10 meters elevation Hours olvalid data: 8760 Total hours in period: 8760 Recovery rate: 100%

60 meters elevation Hours ofvalid data: 8760 Total hours in period: 8760 Recovery rate: 100%

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Joint Frequency Distribution: Hours at Wind and Directioon January - December, 2023 All Stabilities Elevations:: Winds 1OM Stabihty 60M Wind Wind SoeedRange(m/s)

Direction Sector

<0.5 0.51 1.11.5 1.62 2.13 3.14 4.15 5.16 6.18 8.140

>10.00 Total N

16 32 34 34 89 88 58 22 12 0

0 385 NNE 17 37 44 34 83 66 41 13 2

0 0

337 NE 17 36 39 57 95 93 26 3

0 0

0 366 ENE 17 32 37 37 78 69 27 3

0 0

0 300 E

11 29 34 42 86 67 26 10 1

0 0

306 ESE 17 32 38 53 107 61 39 14 0

0 0

361 SE 32 70 88 126 259 100 20 4

1 0

0 700 SSE 20 76 61 111 330 197 92 56 26 4

0 973 S

9 720 SSW 12 29 32 35 156 118 54 39 24 6

0 505 SW 13 30 71 35 11 17 3

0 408 WSW 8

35 49 43 81 58 24 13 7

2 0

W 8

30 25 40 133 88 42 30 11 6

0 41Th WNW 15 37 53 61 137 120 97 53 18 1

0 592 NW 31 36 73 60 109 126 81 52 19 0

0 587 NNW 14 52 42 57 152 110 79 36 5

0 0

547 Tot 257 641 712 896 2193 1623 841 429 195 33 0

7820 Hoursof Calm 940 Hours of Variable Direction 0

Hours of Valid Data 2760 recovery rate:

Hours of Missing Data 0

100.00%

Hours in Period 8760

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Joint Frequency Distribution: Hours at Wind and Directioon January - December, 2023 Stability Class A

Extremely Unstable based on Lapse Rate Elevations:: Winds lOm Stability 60m Wind WindSpeedRange(m/s)

Direction Sector

<0.5 0.51 1.11.5 1.62 2.13 3.14 4.15 5.16 6.18 8110 >10.00 Total N

1 0

0 0

0 1

NNE 0

0 0

1 0

0 0

1 NE 0

0 0

1 0

0 0

2 ENE 0

0 0

3 0

0 0

31 E

0 0

ESE 0

0 0

0 2

1 0

0 0

3 SE 0

0 0

2 3

1 0

0 0

6, SSE 0

0 0

1 5

9 3

0 0

18 S

0 0

1 2

1 3

8 1

0 161 55W 0

0 0

0 5

4 7

2 5

0 0

23 SW 0

0 0

0 2

5 8

2 0

0 0

171 WSW 0

0 0

2 1

1 0

0 0

4 W

0 0

2 5

3 2

0 0

0 12 WNW 0

0 0

0 1

7 7

15 6

0 0

36!

NW 0

0 0

1 6

8 7

0 0

221 NNW 0 __9 0

p 41 Tot 1

0 0

2 14 35 43 43 29 1

0 16&

Hoursof Calm 1

Hours of Variable Direction 0

Hoursof Valid Data.

169 Hours of Missing Data 0

Hours in Period

$760

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Hours in Period 8760 Joint Frequency Distribution: Hours at Wind and Directioon January - December, 2023 Stability Class B

Moderately Unstable based on Lapse Rate Elevations:: Winds lOm Stability 60m Wind Wnd SoeedRange(m/s)

Direction Sector

<0.5 0.5-1 1.14.5 1.62 2.13 3.14 4.15 5.16 6.18 8.140

>10.00 Total N

0 0

3 1

3 0

0 0

0 7

NNE 0

0 0

0 4

1 0

0 0

5 NE 0

1 1

0 5

9 3

0 0

19 ENE 0

0 0

2 4

1 2

0 0

9 E____

0 0

2 1

2 6

0 0

0 11 ESE 0

0 0

2 0

3 10 1

0 0

0 16 SE 0

0 0

2 2

9 3

3 0

0 0

19 SSE 0

1 0

0 3

13 8

5 4

0 0

34 S____

0 0

0 1

2 12 6

9 4

0 0

34 55W 0

0 0

1 8

11 5

8 2

2 0

37 SW 0

0 0

0 9

7 8

0 2

0 0

26 WSW 0

0 1

0 3

3 4

0 0

11 W

0 0

6 6

6 3

0 0

0 21 WNW 0

0 1

0 5

18 12 10 0

0 0

46 NW 0

0 0

0 6

6 8

2 3

0 0

25 NNW 0

0 0

1 3

7 1

0 0

12 Tot 0

2 5

10 65 113 79 41 15 2

0 332 Hours of Calm 0

Hours of Variable Direction 0

Hours of Valid Data 332 Hours of Missing Data 0

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Joint Frequency Distribution: Hours at Wind and Directioon January

- December, 2023 Stability Class C

Slightly Unstable based on Lapse Rate Elevations:: Winds lOm Stability 60m Wind Wind SpeedRange(m/s)

Direction Sector

<0.5 0.54 1.14.5 1.62 2.13 3.14 4.15 5.16 6.18 2.140

>10.00 Total N_______

0 0

2 2

9 9

1 0

0 0

0 23 NNE 0

2 5

4 13 4

4 0

0 0

0 32 NE 0

0 0

9 16 11 0

0 0

36 ENE 0

2 0

11 16 10 1

0 0

0 40 E

0 2

10 9

7 1

0 0

0 31 ESE 0

0 1

3 10 6

7 0

0 0

0 27 SE 0

1 2

3 21 16 2

0 1

0 0

46 SSE 0

0 2

9 20 21 8

2 2

0 0

64 S

0 0

0 4

18 14 11 8

3 0

0 58 55W 0

0 1

5 22 22 11 4

3 1

0 69 SW 0

2 1

3 11 11 6

1 4

0 0

39 WSW 0

1 3

1 8

11 0

1 0

0 0

25 W

0 0

0 1

17 14 2

3 0

0 0

37 WNW 0

1 2

4 10 16 11 7

0 0

0 51 NW 1

1 4

3 9

9 3

4 3

0 0

37j NNW 0

0 2

2 9

14 8

0 1

0 0

36 Tot 1

10 27 55 214 203 91 32 17 1

0 651 Hoursof Calm 0

Hours of Variable Direction 0

Hours of Valid Data 651 Hours of Missing Data 0

Hours in Period 8760

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Joint Frequency Distribution: Hours at Wind and Directioon January

- December, 2023 Stability Class D

Neutral based on Lapse Rate Elevations:: Winds lOm Stability 60m Wind W[ndSpeedRange(m/s)

Direction Sector

<0.5 0.5-1 1.115 1.62 2.13 3.14 4.15 5.16 6.18 8.140 >10.00 Total N

4 6

13 15 58 69 50 20 12 0

0 247 NNE 2

7 14 12 47 52 36 13 2

0 0

185 NE 1

15 12 19 52 65 20 3

0 0

0 187 ENE 4

8 16 43 42 15 2

0 0

0 137 E________

1 8

6 15 38 42 17 9

1 0

0 137 ESE 1

9 11 20 52 32 20 13 0

0 0

158 SE 2

9 18 34 73 46 7

0 0

189 SSE 2

12 13 19 70 55 40 27 12 4

0 254 S

2 8

10 21 42 39 29 32 30 9

0 222 55W 3

6 11 11 47 30 18 17 11 2

0 156 SW 2

15 9

18 44 26 12 7

8 2

0 l43 WSW 0

11 17 8

37 27 16 9

4 2

0 131 W

3 10 11 23 53 45 28 19 9

4 0

205 WNW 1

9 15 21 63 61 63 21 12 1

0 267 NW 3

7 24 21 70 97 60 36 6

0 0

324 NNW 3

5 10 30 90 74 65 36 4

0 0

317 Tot 34 144 202 303 879 802 496 264 111 24 0

3259 Hoursof Calm 44 Hours of Variable Direction 0

Hours of Valid Data 3303 Hours of Missing Data 0

Hours in Period 8760

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Joint Frequency Distribution: Hours at Wind and Directioon January - December, 2023 Stability Class E

Sliehtlv Stable based on Laose Rate Elevations:: Winds lOm Stability 60m Wind Wind SpeedRange(m/s)

Direction Sector

<05 0.5-1 1.14.5 1.62 2.13 3.14 4.15 5.16 6.18 8.140 >10.00 Total N

2 8

7 11 16 9

4 2

0 0

0 59 NNE 6

11 5

10 18 9

1 0

0 0

0 60 NE 4

10 14 20 15 7

3 0

0 0

0 73 ENE 8

12 11 12 18 7

0 0

0 68 E

4 8

15 19 34 10 2

0 0

92 ESE 12 13 13 26 36 19 1

0 0

120 SE 8

20 33 61 135 26 5

0 0

288 SSE 7

12 16 35 116 86 31 13 5

0 0

321 S

1 9

10 14 56 88 52 18 7

1 0

256 55W 2

11 14 10 45 46 12 8

3 1

0 152 SW 3

14 10 21 44 19 1

1 3

1 0

117 WSW 1

14 9

27 24 15 3

2 3

0 0

98 W

1 11 10 10 52 18 3

3 2

2 0

112 WNW 1

14 21 27 57 18 4

0 0

142 NW 5

8 18 17 21 12 4

2 0

0 0

87; NNW 3

15 14 15 37 14 3

0 0

101 Tot 68 190 220 335 724 403 129 49 23 5

0 2146 Hoursof Calm 159 Hours of Variable Direction 0

Hours of Valid Data 2305 Hours of Missing Data 0

Hours in Period 8760

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Joint Frequency Distribution: Hours atWind and Directioon January - December, 2023 Stability Class F

Moderately Stable based on Lapse Rate Elevations:: Winds lOm Stability 60m Wind Wind SpeedRange(m/s)

Direction Sector

<0.5 0.5-1 1.11.5 1.62 2.13 3.14 4.15 5.16 6.18 8.140 >10.00 Total N

1 8

6 4

2 0

0 0

0 21 NNE 4

12 11 7

1 0

0 0

0 35 NE 5

8 10 7

7 0

0 0

0 37 ENE 2

11 15 7

1 0

0 0

0 36 E

6 9

10 5

2 0

0 0

0 32 ESE 2

9 10 1

6 0

1 0

0 0

0 29 SE 19 33 25 25 25 1

0 0

0 128 SSE 3

23 19 34 95 19 0

0 0

193 S

4 11 12 9

47 35 1

0 0

119 55W 4

7 2

7 22 5

1 0

0 0

0 48 SW 3

6 9

11 17 3

0 0

0 49 WSW 5

6 10 7

9 0

0 0

0 37 W

4 6

3 6

3 0

0 0

0 22 WNW 10 11

__p 37 NW 12 14 17 12 2

0 0

57 NNW 1

19 10 6

9 0

0 0

0 45 Tot 85 190 180 155 249 63 3

0 0

925.

Hoursof Calm 319 Hours of Variable Direction 0

Hoursof Valid Data.

1244 Hours of Missing Data 0

Hours in Period 8760

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Joint Frequency Distribution: Hours at Wind and Directioon January - December, 2023 Stability Class G

Extremely Stable based on Lapse Rate Elevations:: Winds lOm Stability 60m Wind

Wind SoeedRange(m/s)

Direction Sector

<0.5 0.54 1.14.5 1.62 2.13 3.14 4.15 5.16 6.18 8.110 >10.00 Total N

8 10 6

2 1

0 0

27 NNE 5

5 9

0 0

19 NE 7

2 2

1 0

0 0

12 ENE 3

2 1

0 1

0 0

7 E

0 2

1 0

0 0

0 3

ESE 2

1 3

1 1

0 0

8 SE 3 7_10 1

3 0

0 0

0 24 SSE 8

28 11 14 26 2

0 0

0 89 S

2 8

1 3

0 1

0 0

0 15 55W 3

4 0

0 0

0 2O SW 5

5 1

1 5

0 0

17 WSW 2

3 9

0 0

14 W

0 3

1 0

0 0

0 4

WNW 3

5 3

2 0

0 0

13i NW 10 6

10 7

1 1

0 0

0 35 NNW 7

13 6

3 3

0 0

32 Tot 68 105 78 36 48 4

0 0

0 339 Hoursof Calm 417 Hours of Variable Direction 0

Hoursof Valid Data..

756 Hours of Missing Data 0

Hours in Period 8760

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Joint Freauencv Distribution: Hours at Wind and Directioon January - December, 2023 All Stabilities Elevations:: Winds 60m Stability 60m Wind WindSpeedRange(m/s)

Direction Sector

<0.5 0.54 1.11.5 1.62 2.13 3.14 4.15 5.16 6.12 8.110 >10.00 Total N

2 8

7 14 52 75 83 85 42 8

0 376 NNE 2

6 11 20 44 69 76 55 19 3

0 305 NE 1

8 9

25 68 101 97 50 30 0

0 389 ENE 2

5 4

14 71 104 120 117 15 0

0 452 E__

1 3

P 2

9 P 402 ESE 1

8 13 17 57 121 113 90 35 2

0 457 SE 3

19 30 64 184 160 79 22 6

0 0

567 SSE 1

12 14 40 138 176 179 152 105 23 5

845 S

2 13 24 19 94 115 160 169 223 54 20 893 SSW 5

9 14 28 72 112 145 140 223 33 14 795 SW 8

11 16 25 74 86 96 100 144 21 10 591 WSW 6

11 8

23 49 53 81 92 84 22 8

437 W

4 6

11 18 54 58 76 121 136 53 20 557 WNW 1

3 10 15 44 59 71 133 178 76 31 621 NW 2

13 5

14 46 70 113 95 117 46 9

5301 NNW 5

9 15 11 47 71 99 87 72 11 0

427 Tot 46 150 204 361 1145 1525 1708 1582 1454 352 117 Hoursof Calm 116 Hours of Variable Direction 0

Hours of Valid Data 8760 recovery rate:

Hours of Missing Data 0

100.00%

Hours in Period 2760

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Joint Frequency Distribution: Hours at Wind and Directioon January

- December, 2023 Stability Class A

Extremely Unstable based on Lapse Rate Elevations:: Winds 60m Stability 6Gm Wind Wind SpeedRange(m/s)

Direction Sector

<0.5 0.5-1 1.1-1.5 1.62 2.1-3 3.14 4.1-5 5.1-6 6.1-8 8.1-10 >10.00 Total N

0 0

NNE 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

1 NE 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

1 0

0 0

2 ENE 0

0 1

0 0

3 E____

0 0

0 1

1 0

0 2

ESE 0 9_0

2 SE 0

0_0 0

0 1

4 2

0 0

0 7

SSE 0

0 0

0 1

8 8

1 0

18 S

0 0

1 1

4 7

1 14 55W 0

0 0

1 5

2 5

3 0

16 SW 0

0 0

0 1

3 4

6 10 0

0 24 WSW 0

0 0

1 1

3 0

0 5

W 0

0 0

0 2

1 5

6 0

14 WNW 0

0 0

0 1

6 12 15 13 47 NW 0

0 0

0 1

1 2

6 1

11 NNW 0

0 0

1 0

2 0

0 0

3i Tot 0 p_0 0

3

169i Hoursof Calm 0

Hours of Variable Direction 0

Hoursof Valid Data.

169 Hours of Missing Data 0

Hours in Period 8760

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Joint Frequency Distribution: Hours at Wind and Directioon January - December, 2023 Stability Class B

Moderately Unstable based on Lapse Rate Elevations:: Winds 60m Stability 60m Wind WindSpeedRange(m/s)

Direction Sector

<0.5 0.5-1 1.14.5 1.62 2.13 3.14 4.15 5.16 6.18 8.110 >10.00 Total N

0 0

3 0

1 1

0 0

0 5

NNE 0

0 0

0 2

1 0

2 0

0 0

5 NE 0

0 0

1 2

11 5

0 1

0 0

201 ENE 0

0 0

0 1

3 2

3 1

0 0

10 E____

0 0

0 2

4 0

0 0

0 ESE 0

0 0

0 2

3 3

8 1

0 0

17 SE 0

0_0 0

2 6

2 4

1 0

0 151 SSE 0

0 0

1 2

11 8

5 5

2 0

34 S

0 0

2 4

6 5

13 3

1 34 SSW 0

0 0

0 1

6 11 5

12 1

3 39 SW 0

0 0

0 2

10 6

5 4

2 0

29 WSW 0

0 0

1 0

2 1

4 5

2 0

15 W

0 0

1 3

3 6

6 4

0 23 WNW 0

0 0

0 1

2 7

14 18 5

3 50 NW 0

0 0

3 5

1 7

3 1

20 NNW 0

0 0

0 1

4 3

0 0

8 Tot 0

0 0

5 22 71 67 63 74 22 8

332 Hoursof Calm 0

Hours of Variable Direction 0

Hoursof Valid Data 332 Hours of Missing Data 0

Hours in Period 8760

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Joint Frequency Distribution: Hours at Wind and Directioon January - December, 2023 Stability Class C

saliehfly Unstable based on Lapse Rate Elevations::

Winds 60m Stability 60m Wind Wind SpeedRange(m/s)

Direction Sector

<0.5 0.54 1.11.5 1.62 2.13 3.14 4.15 5.16 6.18 8.110

>10.00 Total N

0 0

0 1

8 8

1 0

0 19 NNE 0

0 0

6 9

10 6

2 0

0 0

33 NE 0

0 0

5 8

13 5

1 0

0 0

32 ENE 0

0 1

1 8

11 15 8

0 0

0 44 E

0 0

0 2

8 9

4 6

1 0

0 30 ESE 0

f p

29 SE 0

0 0

4 9

18 7

0 0

38 SSE 0

0 2

1 15 15 8

6 1

2 0

50 S__

0 9_2 1_5_13 3

0 SSW 0

0 0

2 8

16 21 8

10 2

2 69 SW 0

0 1

1 13 14 13 8

4 4

0 58 WSW 0

0 0

1 6

7 10 4

5 1

0 34 W

0 0

0 2

2 4

6 16 4

3 0

37 WNW 0

0 0

1 6

12 3

16 8

8 1

55 NW 0

0 0

3 4

8 4

2 6

5 1

33 NNW 0

0 0

0 2

9 7

7 1

0 0

26 Tot 0

0 6

33 123 187 122 93 55 28 4

651 Hoursof Calm 0

Hours of Variable Direction 0

Hours of Valid Data 651 Hours of Missing Data 0

Hours in Period 8760

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Joint Frequency Distribution: Hours atWind and Directioon January

- December, 2023 Stability Class D

Neutral Stability based on Lapse Rate Elevations:: Winds 60m Stability 60m Wind WindSpeedRange(m/s)

Direction Sector

<0.5 0.5-1 1.14.5 1.62 2.13 3.14 4.15 5.16 6.18 8.140 >10.00 Total N

1 2

4 7

22 44 48 45 31 8

0 212 NNE 0

2 8

6 21 36 41 30 17 3

0 164 NE 0

4 7

6 29 38 44 20 12 0

0 160 ENE 1

0 1

5 29 39 40 33 6

0 0

154 E________

0 3

7 3

22 32 36 15 17 0

0 135 ESE 0

3 9

7 22 37 33 24 19 2

0 156 SE 0

5 5

17 39 35 19 4

1 0

0 125 SSE 0

6 21 57 50 30 41 27 12 4

254 S

2 6

13 9

36 37 22 29 51 24 16 245!

ssW 2

3 9

11 28 42 38 32 36 11 6

218 SW 6

5 10 17 34 29 24 18 29 13 6

191 WSW 0

7 4

16 26 28 32 33 25 14 5

190 W

3 4

5 5

23 26 24 33 68 37 16 244 WNW 0

1 5

12 21 26 33 42 84 45 14 283 NW 2

10 4

6 26 26 64 59 77 31 4

309 NNW 3

6 14 7

29 35 53 32 52 11 0

242 Tot 20 67 111 155 464 560 581 490 552 211 71 3282 Hours of Calm 21 Hours of Variable Direction 0

Hoursof Valid Data.

3303 Hours of Missing Data 0

Hours in Period 8760

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Joint Frequency Distribution: Hours atWind and Directioon January - December, 2023 Stability Class E

Slightly Stable based on Lapse Rate Elevations:: Winds 60m Stability 60m Wind Wind SpeedRange(m/s)

Direction Sector

<0.5 0.5-1 1.14.5 1.62 2.13 3.14 4.15 5.16 6.18 8.140 >10.00 Total N

1 2

7 17 21 16 7

0 0

74 NNE 0

1 2

3 7

12 10 5

2 0

0 42 NE 0

0 1

1 10 17 22 11 5

0 0

67 ENE 0

1 1

2 13 33 33 17 2

0 0

102 E________

0 0

2 1

8 26 29 22 3

0 0

91 ESE 0 ?_3

137 SE 0

3 5

16 74 80 38 9

2 0

0 227 SSE 0

1 0

1 27 58 64 57 50 5

1 264 S

0

325 55W 0

2 2

6 20 26 39 43 99 15 3

255 SW 0

2 1

2 11 19 30 41 56 2

4 168 WSW 1

1 3

3 8

6 25 31 31 5

3 117 W

1 0

3 3

7 13 32 42 45 3

4 153 WNW 0

0 0

0 5

5 18 42 40 3

0 113 NW 0

0 0

2 5

19 24 19 15 0

2 86 NNW 0

1 0

3 7

8 25 15 10 0

0 69 Tot 3

17 28 53 247 410 505 472 487 49 19 2290 Hoursof Calm 15 Hours of Variable Direction 0

Hoursof Valid Data.

2305 Hours of Missing Data 0

Hours in Period

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Joint Frequency Distribution: Hours at Wind and Directioon January - December, 2023 Stability Class F

Moderately Stable based on Lapse Rate Elevations:: Winds 60m Stability 60m Wind W[ndSpeedRange(m/s)

Direction Sector

<0.5 0.5-1 1.11.5 1.62 2.13 3.14 4.15 5.16 6.18 8.140 >10.00 Total N

0 0

1 1

3 5

6 15 3

0 0

34 NNE 2

1 0

2 1

5 11 12 0

0 0

34 NE 0

2 0

5 10 11 11 11 4

0 0

54j ENE 0

1 0

3 6

9 17 28 3

0 0

67 E____

1 2

1 4

6 13 24 19 3

0 0

73 ESE 1

0 0

1 10 14 21 17 5

0 0

69 SE 1

3 10 16 43 16 7

3 1

0 0

100 SSE 0

2 1

9 23 29 53 29 13 1

0 160 S________

0 4

2 2

9 10 45 43 26 1

0 142 SSW 2

1 2

2 6

15 23 41 54 1

0 147 SW 2

1 1

3 11 9

18 17 35 0

0 97 WSW 3

0 1

1 3

4 10 14 11 0

0 47 W

0 2

2 6

9 5

6 14 6

0 0

5&

WNW 0

0

__7 f 43 NW 0

3 0

3 9

7 11 12 7

0 0

52 NNW 1

1 0

1 5

10 8

22 3

0 0

51 Tot 13 24 21 59 162 169 275 308 186 3

0 1220 Hours of Calm 24 Hours of Variable Direction 0

Hoursof Valid Data.

1244 Hours of Missing Data 0

Hours in Period 8760

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Joint Frequency Distribution: Hours at Wind and Directioon January

- December, 2023 stability Class 6

Extremely Stable based on Lapse Rate Elevations:: Winds 60m Stability 60m Wind Wind SpeedRange(m/s)

Direction Sector

<0.5 0.5-1 1.11.5 1.62 2.13 3.14 4.15 5.16 6.18 8.140 >10.00 Total N

0 4

1 3

9 1

6 8

0 0

0 32, NNE 0

2 1

3 3

5 8

4 0

0 0

26 NE 1

2 1

7 8

11 10 6

8 0

0 54 ENE 1

3 1

3 14 9

13 26 2

0 0

72 E

0 4

3 2

7 13 23 11 0

0 0

63 ESE 0

3 1

4 6

17 9

5 2

0 0

47 SE 2

8 10 11 17 4

2 0

1 0

0 55 SSE 1

3 5

7 14 13 15 6

1 0

0 65 S

0 2

3 2

9 9

25 16 3

0 0

69 55W 1

3 1

7 9

6 8

9 7

0 0

51 SW 0

3 3

2 2

2 1

5 6

0 0

24 WSW 2

3 0

1 6

6 2

5 4

0 0

29, W

0 1

p 2

0 0

36 WNW 1

1 5

2 3

7 5

2 4

0 0

30 NW 0

0 1

0 2

7 4

1 3

1 0

19 NNW 1

1 1

0 3

4 3

9 6

0 0

28 Tot 10 42 38 56 124 121 137 122 49 1

0 700 Hoursof Calm 56 Hours of Variable Direction 0

Hoursof Valid Data.

756 Hours of Missing Data 0

Hours in Period 8760

Callaway Energy Center 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Appendix C Changes to the Callaway Energy Center Offsite Dose Calculation Manualfor the year 2021 APA-ZZ-01003, Off-Site Dose Calculation Manual, current revision 026, was revised 06/18/2021, and FSAR-SP Ch. 16.11, uOffsite Dose Calculation Manual Radiological Effluent Controls was revised in 2023. A complete copy of each is attached to this report.

WAmeren Callaway MISSOURI Energy Center APA-ZZ-O1 003 OFF-SITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL MINOR Revision 026 Page 1 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Contents 1.

PURPOSEANDSCOPE 5

2.

LIQUID EFFLUENTS 5

2.1.

Liquid Effluent Monitors 5

2.1.1.

Continuous Liquid Effluent Monitors 7

2.1.2.

Radioactive Liquid Batch Release Effluent Monitors 7

2.2.

Calculation of Liquid Effluent Monitor Setpoints 7

2.2.1.

CALCULATION OFTHE ECVSUM 7

2.2.2.

CALCULATION OF THE MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE LIQUID EFFLUENT DISCHARGE FLOW RATE 8

2.2.3.

CALCULATION OF LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITOR SETPOINT 9

2.3.

Liquid Effluent Concentration Measurements 10 2.4.

Dose due to Liquid Effluents 10 2.4.1.

THE MAXIMUM EXPOSED INDIVIDUAL 10 2.4.2.

CALCULATION OF DOSE FROM LIQUID EFFLUENTS 11 2.4.3.

SUMMARY

, CALCULATION OF DOSE DUE TO LIQUID EFFLUENTS 13 2.5.

Liquid Radwaste Treatment System 13 2.6.

Liquid Effluents Dose Factors 13 3.

GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 13 3.1 Gaseous Effluent Monitors 13 3.1.1.

CONTINUOUS RELEASE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORS 14 3.1.2.

BATCH RELEASE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORS 16 3.2.

Gaseous Effluent Monitor Setpoints 16 3.2.1.

TOTAL BODY DOSE RATE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS 16 3.2.2.

SKIN DOSE RATE SETPOINT CALCULATION 17 3.3.

Calculation of Dose and Dose Rate from Gaseous Effluents 18 3.3.1.

DOSE RATE FROM GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 18 3.3.2.

DOSE DUE TO GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 20 3.4.

Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System 22 3.5.

Gaseous Effluents Dose Factors 23 4.

DOSE AND DOSE COMMITMENT FROM URANIUM FUEL CYCLESOURCES 23 Page 2 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 4.1.

Calculation of Dose and Dose Commitment from Uranium Fuel Cycle Sources 23 4.1.1.

IDENTIFICATION OF THE MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC 24 4.1.2.

TOTAL DOSE TO THE NEAREST RESIDENT 24 4.1.3.

TOTAL DOSE TO THE CRITICAL RECEPTOR WITHIN THE SITEBOUNDARY 25 5.

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 29 5.1.

Description Of The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 29 5.2.

Performance Testing Of Environmental Thermoluminescence Dosimeters 29 6.

ANNUAL AVERAGE ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION PARAMETERS 29 6.1.

Annual Atmospheric Dispersion Parameters 29 6.1.1.

Determination of Dispersion Estimates for Special Receptor Locations 29 6.1.2.

Atmospheric Dispersion Parameters for Farming Areas within the SiteBoundary 30 6.2.

Annual Meteorological Data Processing 30 7.

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 31 7.1 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 31 7.2.

Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 31 8.

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT CONTROLS (REC) 31 9.

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 31 9.1.

Major Changes to Liquid and Gaseous Radwaste Treatment Systems 31 9.2.

Changes to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) 32 10.

BIBLIOGRAPHY 32 Table 1: Ingestion Dose Commitment Values (A1) for Adult Age Group 37 Table 2: Bioaccumulation Factor (Bf1) 40 Table 3: Dose Factor for Exposure to a Semi-Infinite Cloud of Noble Gases 41 Table 4: Ground Plane Pathway Dose Factors fR) 42 Table 5: Child Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors (R,)

43 Table 6: Child Grass-Cow Milk Pathway Dose Factors fR1) 45 Table 7: Child Grass-Goat Milk Pathway Dose Factors (R) 47 Page 3 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Table 8: Child Grass-Cow-Meat Pathway Dose Factors (R) 49 Table 9: Child Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors (R) 51 Table 10: Highest Annual Average Atmospheric Dispersion Parameters 53 Table 11: Application of Atmospheric Dispersion Parameters for Release Permits 54 Table 12: Application of Atmospheric Dispersion Parameters Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report 55 Table 13: Meteorological Data Selection Hierarchy 56 Table 14: Adult Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors (R) 57 Table 15: Adult Grass-Cow Milk Pathway Dose Factors (R) 59 Table 16: Adult Grass-Goat Milk Pathway Dose Factors (R) 61 Table 17: Adult Grass-Cow-Meat Pathway Dose Factors fR) 63 Table 18: Adult Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors (R) 65 Appendix A: Methodology for Calculating Dose from 14C in Gaseous Effluents 67 Appendix B: Record of Revisions 80 Page 4 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 OFF-SITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL

1. Purpose and Scope The Qffsite Dose Calculation Manual (QDCM) describes the methodology and parameters used in the calculation of off-site doses resulting from radioactive gaseous and liquid effluents, in the calculation of gaseous and liquid effluent monitoring Alarm/Trip Setpoints, and in the conduct of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program. The QDCM also contains the Radioactive Effluent Controls and Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program required by TIS 5.5.4 and FSAR-SP Chapter 16.11.4, and descriptions of the information that should be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating and Annual Effluent Release Reports required by TIS 5.6.2 and TIS 5.6.3 Compliance with the Radiological Effluent Controls limits demonstrates compliance with the limits of 10 CFR 2013011,2,3 The ODCM consists oftwo parts: FSAR-SP Chapter 16.11 which contains the Radiological Effluent Controls (REC5), and APA-ZZ-01003, which contains the methodology and parameters used to implement the RECs.

2. Liquid Effluents 2.1. Liquid Effluent Monitors Gross radioactivity monitors which provide for automatic termination of liquid effluent releases are present on the liquid effluent lines. Flow rate measurement devices are present on the liquid effluent lines and the discharge line (cooling tower blowdown). Setpoints, precautions, and limitations applicable to the operation of the Callaway Plant liquid effluent monitors are provided in the appropriate Plant Procedures. Setpoint values are calculated to assure that alarm and trip actions occur prior to exceeding ten times the Effluent Concentration Values (ECV) limits in I 0 CFR Part 20 at the release point to the Unrestricted Area. The calculated alarm and trip action setpoints for the liquid effluent line monitors and flow measuring devices must satisfy the following equation:

cf F÷f Eq. 1 Where:

1 Statements of Consideration, Federal Register, Vol. 56, No. 98, Tuesday, May 21, 1991, Subpart D, page 23374 2

CFR 50.36 a (b) 3 Letter, F. J. Congel to J. F. Schmidt, dated April 23, 1991 Page5 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 C is the liquid effluent concentration value (ECV) implementing REC I 6. 1 1. I. I for the site in pCi/mI; C IS the setpoint, in (pCi/mi), of the radioactivity monitor measuring the radioactivity concentration in the effluent line prior to dilution and subsequent release. The setpoint, which is inversely related to the volumetric flow of the effluent line and directly related to the volumetric flow of the dilution stream plus the effluent steam, represents a value, which, if exceeded, would result in concentrations exceeding ten times the values of 10 CFR Part 20 Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2, in the Unrestricted Area; I is the undiluted waste flow rate as measured at the radiation monitor location, in volume per unit time, but in the same units as F, below; and F is the dilution water flow rate setpoint as measured prior to the release point, in volume per unit time. If F is large compared to 1, then F + f F.4 The radioactive liquid waste stream is diluted by the plant discharge line prior to entry into the Missouri River. The dilution flow is obtained from the cooling tower blowdown, but should this become unavailable, the plant water treatment facility supplies the necessary dilution flow via a bypass line. No direct discharge of wastewater from the liquid radioactive waste treatment system without the use of dilution flow from the cooling tower blowdown or cooling tower bypass is permitted. A minimum of 3000 gpm dilution flow from the cooling tower blowdown or cooling tower bypass needs to be used to discharge from the liquid radioactive waste treatment system.5 The limiting concentration which corresponds to the liquid radwaste effluent monitor setpoint is to be calculated using methodology from the expression above. Thus, the expression for determining the setpoint of the liquid radwaste effluent line monitor becomes:

c C(F+f) (pCi/mi)

Eq.2 The alarm/trip setpoint calculations are based on the minimum dilution flow rate (corresponding to the dilution flow rate setpoint), the maximum effluent stream flow rate, and the actual isotopic analysis. Due to the possibility of a simultaneous release from more than one release pathway, a portion of the total site release limit is allocated to each pathway. The determination and usage of the allocation factor is discussed in Section 2.2. In the event the alarm/trip setpoint is reached, an evaluation will be performed using actual dilution and effluent flow values and actual isotopic analysis to ensure that REC I 6.1 1.1.1 limits were not exceeded.

4 NUREG-0133, pages AA-1 thru AA-3 5 Ameren Missouri Callaway Energy Center State of Missouri National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit, MO-0098001 Page 6 of $8 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 2.1.1.

Continuous Liquid Effluent Monitors There are no continuous liquid release pathways. Steam Generator Blowdown is discharged to the discharge monitoring tanks for batch release.67 2.1.2.

Radioactive Liquid Batch Release Effluent Monitors The radiation monitor associated with the liquid effluent batch release system 15:8 Monitor l.D.

Description HB-RE-18 Liquid Radwaste Discharge Monitor This effluent stream is normally considered to be radioactive. The sampling frequency, minimum analysis frequency, and the type of analysis performed are per FSAR-SP Table 16.11-1.

2.2. Calculation of Liquid Effluent Monitor Setpoints The dependence ofthe setpoint, c, on the radionuclide distribution, yields, calibration, and monitor parameters, requires that several variables be considered in setpoint calculations.9 2.2.1.

Calculation of the ECV Sum The isotopic concentration of the release(s) being considered must be determined. This is obtained from the analyses required per FSAR-SP Table 16.11-1

, and is used to calculate an ECV sum (ECVSUM):

ECVSUM =a: (c1)/(Ecv1))

I = g, a, 5, t, f Eq.3 Where:

Cg IS the concentration of each measured gamma emitting nuclide observed by gamma-ray spectroscopy of the waste sample; Ca IS the concentration of 237Np, 238Pu, 2391240Pu, 241Pu, 241Am, 242Cm, & 2431244Cm, in the quarterly composite sample based on previous composite sample analyses; C is the measured concentrations of 89Sr and 905r as determined by analysis of the quarterly composite sample based on previous composite sample analyses; C is the measured concentration of 3H in the waste sample; and 6 MP 19-0114 7 UQTH 20200008 8 FSAR-SP, Section 11.5.2.2.3.2 9 NUREG-0133, pages AA-1 thru AA-3 Page7 of 8$

INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Cf is the measured concentration of 55Fe & 63Ni as determined by analysis of the quarterly composite sample based on previous composite sample analyses.

ECV9, ECVS, ECVa, ECVf, and ECV are ten times the limiting concentrations of the appropriate radionuclides from I 0 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2x1 0 pCi/mI total activity.

For the case ECVSUM 1, the monitor tank effluent concentration meets the limits of REC I 6.1 1.1.1 without dilution and the effluent may be released at any desired flow rate. If ECVSUM > I then dilution is required to ensure compliance with the concentration limits of REC 16.11.1.1

. If simultaneous releases are occurring or are anticipated, an allocation fraction, N, must be applied so that available dilution flow may be apportioned among simultaneous discharge pathways. The value of N may be any value between 0 and I for a particular discharge point, provided that the sum of the allocation fractions for all discharge points must be 1.

2.2.2.

Calculation of the Maximum Permissible Liquid Effluent Discharge Flow Rate The maximum permissible liquid effluent discharge flow rate is calculated by:

f (F+f)*SF*N÷(ECVSUM)

Eq.4 Where:

fmax is the maximum permissible liquid effluent discharge flow rate, (in gallons/minute);

f is the expected undiluted liquid effluent flow rate, in gpm; N is the allocation fraction which apportions dilution flow among simultaneous discharge pathways (see discussion above); and SF is the safety factor; an administrative factor used to compensate for statistical fluctuations and errors of measurements. This factor also provides a margin of safety in the calculation of the maximum liquid effluent discharge flow rate (max)

The value of SF should be I.

F and ECVSUM are previously defined.

The dilution water supply is furnished with a flow monitor which isolates the liquid effluent discharge if the dilution flow rate falls below its setpoint value.

In the event that fmax is less than f, then the value of fmax is substituted into the equation for f, and a new fmax value is calculated. This substitution is performed for three iterations in order to calculate the correct value of fmax.

Page 8 of $8 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 2.2.3. Calculation of Liquid Effluent Monitor Setpoint The liquid effluent monitors are Nal(Tl) based systems and respond primarily to gamma radiation. Accordingly, their setpoint is based on the total concentration of gamma emitting nuclides in the effluent:

c=O.95.[bkg+[(>Cg)+/-SF))

Eq. 5 Where:

c is the monitor setpoint as previously defined, in pCi/mI; bkg is the monitor background prior to discharge, in pCi/mI, adjusted for monitor response; and 0.95 is a factor for conservatism to ensure the monitor trips prior to exceeding the limits of REC 16.11.1.1 cy and SF are as previously defined.

The monitors background is controlled at an appropriate limit to ensure adequate sensitivity.

Utilizing the methodology ofANSI N13.10-1974, the background must be maintained at a value of less than or equal to 9x1 06 pCi/mi (relative to 137Cs) in order to detect a change of 4x1 0 pCi/mI of 310 In the event that there is no detectable gamma activity in the effluent or if the value of

{(Cg)SF} is less than the background ofthe monitor, then the monitor setpointwill be set at twice the current background of the monitor.

As previously stated, the monitors response is dependent on the gamma emitting radionuclide distribution of the effluent. Accordingly, a database conversion factor is calculated for each release based upon the results of the gamma spectrometric analysis of the effluent sample and the measured response of the monitor to National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) traceable calibration sources:

DBCF =((Cg))(CMR)X(ECF)

Eq. 6 DBCFC is the monitor data base conversion factor which converts count rate into concentration (pCi/mI);

10 HPCI 9605, Calculation of Maximum Background Value for HB-RE-18 Page 9 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 CMR is the calculated response of the radiation monitor to the liquid effluent; ECF is the conversion factor for 137Cs, which converts count rate into concentration (pCi/mI).

Cg is as previously defined.

The new value of the DBCFC is calculated and entered into the monitor data base prior to each discharge. A more complete discussion of the derivation and calculation of the CMR is given in HPCI 8710.

2.3. Liquid Effluent Concentration Measurements Liquid batch releases are discharged as a discrete volume and each release is authorized based upon the sample analysis and the dilution flow rate existing in the discharge line at the time of release. To assure representative sampling, each liquid monitor tank is isolated and thoroughly mixed by recirculation of tank contents prior to sample collection. The methods for mixing, sampling, and analyzing each batch are outlined in applicable plant procedures. The allowable release rate limit is calculated for each batch based upon the pre-release analysis, dilution flow-rate, and other procedural conditions, prior to authorization for release. The liquid effluent discharge is monitored prior to entering the dilution discharge line and will automatically be terminated if the pre-selected alarm/trip setpoint is exceeded. Concentrations are determined primarily from the gamma isotopic and 3H analyses of the liquid batch sample.

For 89Sr, 90Sr, 55Fe, 63Ni, 237Np, 238Pu, 2391240Pu, 241Pu, 241Am, 242Cm, & 2431244Cm, the measured concentrations from the previous quarterly composite analyses are used until laboratory results become available. Composite samples are collected for each batch release and analyzed in accordance with FSAR-SP Table 16.11-1

. The dose from liquids discharged as continuous releases is calculated by utilizing the last measured values of samples in accordance with FSAR-SP Table 16.1 1-1.

2.4. Dose due to Liquid Effluents 2.4.1.

The Maximum Exposed Individual The cumulative dose determination considers the dose contributions from the maximum exposed individuals consumption of fish and potable water, as appropriate. Normally, the adult is considered to be the maximum exposed individual.11 The Callaway Plants liquid effluents are discharged to the Missouri River. As there are no potable water intakes within I 0 miles of the discharge point,1213 this pathway does not require routine evaluation. Therefore, the dose contribution from fish consumption is expected to account for more than 95% of the total man-rem dose from discharges to the Missouri River.

11 NUREG-0133, Section 4.3 12 Environmental Report, OLS, Table 2.1-19 13 FSAR-SA Section 1 1.2.3.3.4 Page 10 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Dose from recreational activities is expected to contribute the additional 5%, which is considered to be negligible.14 2.4.2.

Calculation of Dose from Liquid Effluents The dose contributions for the total time period M1 are calculated at least once each 31 days and a cumulative summation of the total body and individual organ doses is maintained for each calendar quarter. Dose is calculated for all radionuclides identified in liquid effluents released to Unrestricted Areas using the following expression:15 D

[A1 fit1 C1, F]

Eq.7 Where:

D is the cumulative dose commitment to the total body or any organ, r, from the liquid effluents for the total period &, in mrem.

Ati is the length of the fh time period over which C,i and F1 are averaged for all liquid releases, in hours. lit1 corresponds to the actual duration of the release(s).

C1,1 is the average measured concentration of radionuclide, i, in undiluted liquid effluent during the time period £ti from any liquid release, in (pCi/mI).

A is the site-related ingestion dose commitment factor to the total body or any organ -t for each identified principal alpha, gamma and beta emitter listed in FSAR-SP Table 16.11-1

, in (mrem/hr) per (pCi/mI).

F, is the near field average dilution factor for C11 during any liquid effluent release:

I =

fmax tFfmax)89.77 Eq.$

Where:

Fmaj 5 the maximum undiluted effluent flow rate during the release; F is the average dilution flow; and 14 FSAR-SA, Section 11.2.3.4.3 15 NUREG-0133, Section 4.3 Page 11 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 89.77 is site specific applicable factor for the mixing effect of the discharge structure.161718 The term C1,1 is the undiluted concentration of radioactive material in liquid waste at the common release point determined in accordance with REC 16.11.1.1, Table 16.11-1, Radioactive Liquid Waste Sampling and Analysis Program. All dilution factors beyond the sample point(s) are included in the F1 term.

As there are currently no potable water intakes within I 0 river miles of the discharge point, the drinking water pathway is not included in dose estimates to the maximally exposed individual.

Should future potable water intakes be constructed within 1 0 river miles downstream of the discharge point, then this manual will be revised to include this pathway in dose estimates.19 The A1 values given in Table I were calculated according to:2° AT k0 (U/D + UFBFI + U,Bl)DF1 Eq. 9 Since there are no drinking water pathways, and CEC is a freshwater site, the terms for drinking water consumption (U/D ) and invertebrate consumption (U1BI1) go to zero and the equation simplifies to:

AjT= kOUFBFDF Eq. 10 Where:

k0is a constant of units conversion, 1.14x105 = (106 pCi/pCi

. 10 mI/kg I 8760 hr/yr)

UF 5 the adult fish consumption, 21 kg/yr 21 BF is the bioaccumulation factor for nuclide, i, in fresh water fish, pCi/kg per pCi/L.2223 DF is the dose conversion factor for nuclide, i, for adults for organ, T, in mrem/pCi.

16 NEO-54 17 UOTH 83-58 18 CAR 200700053-Attachments: Phase I final draft 19 FSAR-SP, Section 11.2.3.3.4 20 NUREG-0133, Section 4.3.1 21 NUREG-0133, Section 4.3.1, pp. 16 22 UCRL-50564, Table 6 23 NUREG/CR4013, pp. 3.17 Page 12 of $8 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 2.4.3.

Summary, Calculation of Dose Due to Liquid Effluents The dose contribution for the total time period &1 is determined by calculation at least once per 31 days and a cumulative summation of the total body and organ doses is maintained for each calendar quarter. The projected dose contribution from liquid effluents for which radionuclide concentrations are determined by periodic composite and grab sample analysis may be approximated by using the last measured value. Dose contributions are determined for all radionuclides identified in liquid effluents released to Unrestricted Areas.

Nuclides which are not detected in the analyses are reported as less than the Minimum Detectable Activity (MDA) and are not reported as being present at the Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) for that nuclide. The less than values are not used in the dose calculations.

2.5. Liquid Radwaste Treatment System The Liquid Radwaste Treatment System is described in FSAR-SP Chapter 11.2.

The Operability of the Liquid Radwaste Treatment System ensures this system will be available for use when liquids require treatment prior to their release to the environment.

Operability is demonstrated through compliancewith REC 16.11.1.1. and 16.11.1.2.

Projected doses due to liquid releases to Unrestricted Areas are determined each 31 days.

The prior 31 day period is used to calculate compliance. This may be modified as appropriate to account for changes in radwaste treatment which may have a significant effect on the projected doses.

2.6. Liquid Effluents Dose Factors The dose conversion factors provided in Table I were derived from the appropriate dose conversion factors of Regulatory Guide I

. I 09, Table 2.2 and other sources as necessary.2425

3. Gaseous Effluents 3.1. Gaseous Effluent Monitors Noble gas activity monitors are present on the containment building ventilation system, plant unit ventilation system, and radwaste building ventilation system.

The alarm/trip (alarm & trip) setpoint for any gaseous effluent radiation monitor is determined based on the instantaneous noble gas total body and skin dose rate limits of REC 16.11.2.1, at the Site Boundary location with the highest annual average X/Q value.

24 HPCI 0406 25 HPCI 1604 Page 13 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Each gaseous monitor channel is provided with a two level system which provides sequential alarms on increasing radioactivity levels. These setpoints are designated as alert setpoints and alarm/trip setpoints.26 The radiation monitor alarm/trip setpoints for each release point are based on the radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents. It is not considered practicable to apply instantaneous alarm/trip setpoints to integrating radiation monitors sensitive to radioiodines, radioactive materials in particulate form and radionuclides other than noble gases. The exception is GL RE-202. The only effluent released from the Laundry Decon Facility Dryer Exhaust is in the particulate form. Conservative assumptions may be necessary in establishing setpoints to account for system variables, such as the measurement system efficiency and detection capabilities during normal, anticipated, and unusual operating conditions, variability in release flow and principal radionuclides, and the time lag between alarm/trip action and the final isolation of the radioactive effluent.27 FSAR-SP Table I 6.1 1-6 provides the instrument surveillance requirements, such as calibration, source checks, functional tests, and channel checks.

3.1.1.

Continuous Release Gaseous Effluent Monitors The radiation detection monitors associated with continuous gaseous effluent releases are:2829 Monitor l.D.

Description GT-RE-21 Unit Vent GH-RE-10 Radwaste Building Vent GL-RE-202 Laundry Decon Facility Dryer Exhaust Monitor Each of the above continuously monitors gaseous radioactivity concentrations downstream of the last point of potential influent, and therefore measures effluents and not inplant concentrations.

The unit vent monitor continuously monitors the effluent from the unit vent for gaseous radioactivity. The unit vent, via ventilation exhaust systems, continuously purges various tanks and sumps normally containing low-level radioactive aerated liquids that can potentially generate airborne activity. The exhaust systems which supply air to the unit vent are from the fuel building, auxiliary building, the access control area, the containment purge, and the condenser air discharge.

26 FSAR-SP Section 1 1 5.2.1.2 27 NUREG- 0133, section 5.1.1 28 FSAR-SP Section 11.5.2.3.3.1 29 FSAR-SP Section 1 1.5.2.3.3.2 Page 14 of $8 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 The unit vent monitor provides alarm functions only, and does not terminate releases from the unit vent.

The Radwaste Building ventilation effluent monitor continuously monitors for gaseous radioactivity in the effluent duct downstream of the exhaust filter and fans. The flow path provides ventilation exhaust for all parts of the building structure and components within the building and provides a discharge path for the waste gas decay tank release line. These components represent potential sources for the release of gaseous and air particulate and iodine activities in addition to the drainage sumps, tanks, and equipment purged by the waste processing system.

This monitor will isolate the waste gas decay tank discharge line upon a high gaseous radioactivity alarm.

The Laundry Decon Facility Dryer Exhaust Monitor continuously monitors the effluent of the dryer exhaust for particulate radioactivity during operation of the dryers. This effluent point is designed to release an insignificant quantity of radioactivity. The items to be placed in the dryers are typically washed before drying removing most of the radioactive material. The dryer effluent then passes through a HEPA filter before being sampled and released.

The Laundry Decon Facility Dryer Exhaust Monitor will secure the dryers and exhaust fans and isolate the dryer effluent upon a high radioactivity alarm or for a monitor failure.

The continuous Unit Vent and Radwaste Building Vent gaseous effluent monitor setpoints are established using the methodology described in Section 3.2. Since there are two continuous gaseous effluent release points, a fraction of the total dose rate limit (DRL) will be allocated to each release point. Neglecting the batch releases, the plant Unit Vent monitor has been allocated 0.7 DRL and the Radwaste Building Vent monitor has been allocated 0.3 DRL.

These allocation factors may be changed as required to support plant operational needs, but shall not be allowed to exceed unity (i.e., I.0). Therefore, a particular monitor reaching the setpoint would not necessarily mean the dose rate limit at the Site Boundary is being exceeded; the alarm only indicates that the specific release point is contributing a greater fraction of the dose rate limit than was allocated to the associated monitor, and will necessitate an evaluation of both systems.

For a loss of all isokinetic sampling and/or all heat tracing for the Unit Vent or Radwaste Building Vent grab samplers, one hour is allowed to restore a sampler to service.

If sampling cannot be restored within one hour, all batch releases and ventilation not required for the operation ofthe plant should be secured. The best available sampling should be maintained during this period and normal sampling returned to service as soon as possible.

Page 15 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 3.1.2.

Batch Release Gaseous Effluent Monitors The radiation monitors associated with batch release gaseous effluents are:303132 Monitor l.D.

Description GT-RE-22, GT-RE-33 Containment Purge System GH-RE-10 Radwaste Building Vent The Containment Purge System continuously monitors the containment purge exhaust duct during purge operations for gaseous radioactivity. The primary purpose of these monitors is to isolate the containment purge system on high gaseous activity via the ESFAS.

The sample points are located outside the containment between the containment isolation dampers and the containment purge filter adsorber unit.

The Radwaste Building Vent monitor was previously described.

A pre-release isotopic analysis is performed for each batch release to determine the identity and quantity of the principal radionuclides. The alarm/trip setpoint(s) is adjusted accordingly to ensure thatthe limits of REC 16.11.2.1 are not exceeded.

3.2. Gaseous Effluent Monitor Setpoints The alarm/trip setpoint for the Unit Vent and Radwaste Building Vent gaseous effluent monitors is determined based on the more restrictive of the total body dose rate (Eq. 1 1) and skin dose rate (Eq. 1 3) as calculated for the Site Boundary. In the event there is no noble gas activity in the sample, then the high alarm setpoint is set to the default value of 2.2E-02 pCi/cc.

This corresponds to 50% ofthe 500 mrem/yr limit of REC 16.1J.2.1. Each monitor is allocated only 50% of the limit such that the sum total of the two monitors cannot exceed the limit.

The alarm! trip setpoint for the Laundry Decon Facility Exhaust Monitor is set to less than or equal to 2,000 cpm above equilibrium background. The maximum allowed background is 2,000 cpm as discussed in HPCI 99-05.

3.2.1.

Total Body Dose Rate Setpoint Calculations To ensure thatthe limits of REC 16.11.2.1 are met, the alarm/trip setpoint based on the total body dose rate is calculated according to:

5tb

DtbRtbFF, 30 FSAR-SP Section 11.5.2.3.3.2 31 FSAR-SP Section 1 1.5.2.3.2.3 32 FSAR-SP Section 1 1.5.2.3.2.2 33 HPCI 8403, page 9 Page 16 of $8 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Eq. 11 Where:

Stb IS the alarm/trip setpoint based on the total body dose rate (pCi/cc);

Dtb 5 the REC 16.11.2.1 dose rate limit of 500 mrem/yr, conservatively interpreted as a continuous release over a one year period; F is the safety factor; a conservative factor used to compensate for statistical fluctuations and errors of measurement. (For example, F5 0.5 corresponds to a 1 00% variation.) Default value is F5 0.1.

Fa 15 the allocation factor which will modify the required dilution factor such that simultaneous gaseous releases may be made without exceeding the limits of REC 16.11.2.1.

Rtb is a factor used to convert dose rate to the effluent concentration as measured by the effluent monitor, in (pCi/cc) per (mrem/yr) to the total body, determined according to:

Rtb=C +/- [(;;;) (KiQi)]

Eq. 12 Where:

C is the reading of a noble gas monitor corresponding to the sample radionuclide concentrations for the release. Concentrations are determined in accordance with FSAR sP Table 16.11-4. The mixture of radionuclides determined via grab sampling ofthe effluent stream or source is correlated to a calibration factor to determine monitor response. The monitor response is based on concentration, not release rate, and is in units of (pCi/cc);

jii is the highest calculated annual average relative concentration for any area at or beyond the Site Boundary in (sec/m3) (Table 1 0, Table 1 1, and Table I 2);

K is the total body dose factor due to gamma emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide, in (mrem/yr) per (pCi/rn3) (Table 3); and Qi is the rate of release of noble gas radionuclide, i, in QiCi/sec).

Qi is calculated as the product of the ventilation path flow rate and the measured activity of the effluent stream as determined by sampling.

3.2.2.

Skin Dose Rate Setpoint Calculation To ensure that the limits of REC 16.11.2.1 are met, the alarm/trip setpoint based on the skin dose rate is calculated according to:

Page 17 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 ss DSRSFF Eq. 13 Where:

F and Fa are as previously defined; ss is the alarm/trip setpoint based on the skin dose rate; D is the REC 16.11.2.1 dose rate limit of 3000 mrem/yr, conservatively interpreted as a continuous release over a one year period; and R is the factor used to convert dose rate to the effluent concentration as measured by the effluent monitor, in (pci/cc) per (mrem/yr) to the skin, determined according to:

R5=C÷[(X/Q) (L1+;.;M1)

Eq. 14 Where:

L is the skin dose factor due to beta emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide, in (mrem/yr) per QiCi/m3);

I.1 is a factor of units conversion; I mrad air dose = I.1 mrem skin dose; and M1 is the air dose factor due to gamma emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide, in (mrad/yr) per (pCi/m3).

C,

, and Q1 are previously defined.

3.3. Calculation of Dose and Dose Rate from Gaseous Effluents 3.3.1.

Dose Rate from Gaseous Effluents The following methodology is applicable to the location (Site Boundary or beyond) characterized by the values of the parameter X/Q which results in the maximum total body or skin dose rate. In the event that the analysis indicates a different location for the total body and skin dose limitations, the location selected for consideration is that which minimizes the allowable release values.34 The factors K1, L, and M relate the radionuclide airborne concentrations to various dose rates, assuming a semi-infinite cloud model.

3.3.1.1.

Dose Rate from Noble Gases 34 NUREG-0133, Section 5.1.2 Page 18 of $8 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 The release rate limit for noble gases is determined according to the following general relationships:35 Dtb

[K1Q, ((X/Q))]

500 mrem/yr Eq. 15 D = [(L1 + 1.1 M1)((X/Q)Q1)]

3000 mrem/yr Eq. 16 Where:

Qi is the release rate of noble gas radionuclides, i, in gaseous effluents, from all vent releases in (j.tCilsec); and 1.1 is a factor of units conversion factor; I mrad air dose = 1.1 mrem skin dose.

L, M, K, (x/Q), Dband Dare as previously identified.

3.3.1.2.

Dose Rate from Radionudildes Other than Noble Gases The release rate limit for 1311 and 1331, for 3H, and for all radioactive materials in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days is determined according to:36 D0 =R1[X/Q] Q.

1500 mrem/yr Eq. 17 Where:

D0 is the dose rate to any critical organ, in (mrem/yr);

R is the dose parameter for radionuclides other than noble gases for the inhalation pathway for the child, based on the critical organ, in (mrem/yr) per (pCiIm3); and Qi is the release rate of radionuclides other than noble gases, i, in gaseous effluents, from all vent releases in (pCi/sec).

(x/Q) is as previously defined.

The dose parameter (R) includes the internal dosimetry of radionuclide, i, and the receptors breathing rate, which are functions of the receptors age. The child age group has been 35 NUREG-0133, Section 5.1.2 36 NUREG-0133, Section 5.2.1 Page 19 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 selected as the limiting age group. All radiodines are assumed to be released in elemental form.37 R values were calculated according to:38 R1 = K (BR) DFA1 Eq. 18 Where:

K is a factor of units conversion factor: 1x106 pCi/pCi; BR is the breathing rate from Regulatory Guide 1.109, Table E-5 (m3/yr);

DFA is the maximum organ inhalation dose factor for the jth radionuclide, in (mrem/pCi). The total body is considered as an organ in the selection of DFA.394° The results of periodic tritium, iodine and particulate samples of the Unit Vent and Radwaste Vent are used to verify the dose rate limit was not exceeded for the period during which the samples or composite samples were obtained.

3.3.2.

Dose Due to Gaseous Effluents 3.3.2. 1.

Air Dose Due to Noble Gases The air dose at the Site Boundary due to noble gases is calculated according to the following methodology:41 During any calendar quarter, for gamma radiation:

Dg = 3. 1 7E-08 [M, (2) Q]

5 mrad Eq. 19 During any calendar quarter, for beta radiation:

Db 3.17E-08 [N, (?) 11 10 mrad Eq. 20 During any calendar year, for gamma radiation:

37 NUREG-0133, Section 5.2.1 38 NUREG-0133, Section 5.2.1.1 39 Regulatory Guide I.109, Appendix E, Table E-9 40 ZZ-48 41 NUREG-0133, Section 5.3.1 Page 20 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Dg = 3. 1 7E-08 [MI :;;; 1]

o Eq. 21 During any calendar year, for beta radiation

Db 3.17E-08 [N,

, ]

20 mrad Eq. 22 Where:

Dg is the air dose in mrad, from gamma radiation due to noble gases released in gaseous effluent; Db 5 the air dose in mrad, from beta radiation due to noble gases released in gaseous effluents; N is the air dose factor due to beta emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide, i, in (mrad/yr) per (tCi/m3);

Qi is the releases of noble gas radionuclides, i, in gaseous effluents, for all gaseous releases in QiCi). Releases are cumulative over the calendar quarter or year as appropriate. Q is calculated as the product of the ventilation flow rate and the measured activity of the effluent stream as determined by sampling; and 3.17x108 is the inverse of the number of seconds per year.

)iiii & M are as previously defined.

3.3.2.2.

Dose Due to Radionuclides Other than Noble Gases The dose to a Member ofthe Public from 1311 and 1331, for 3H, and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released to areas at and beyond the Site Boundary, is calculated according to the following expressions:

During any calendar quarter:

.D1 7.5 Eq. 23 During any calendar year:

15 mrem Eq. 24 For each pathway, j, (i.e., for inhalation, ground plane, meat, cow-milk, goat-milk, and vegetation) is calculated according to the expression:

Page 21 of $8 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 D1 = 3.17E Eq. 25 Where:

is the dose in mrem, to a Member of the Public from radionuclides other than noble gases, from pathway j, received by organ I (including total body);

R,

is the dose factor for each identified radionuclide, i, in m2 (mrem/yr) per (pCi/sec) or (mrem/yr) per (iCiIm3) as appropriate, for the pathway, and exposed organ I, appropriate to the age group of the critical Member of the Public receptor; Wi is the )(/Q for the inhalation and tritium pathways, in sec/m3 and is the D/Q for the food and ground plane pathways, in meters2.

w the average relative deposition of the effluent at or beyond the Site Boundary, considering depletion ofthe plume during transport; Qi is the release of radioiodines, radioactive materials in particulate form, and radionuclides other than noble gases, i, in gaseous effluents, for all gaseous releases in iCi. Releases are cumulative over the calendar quarter or year as appropriate. Q is calculated as the product of ventilation flow rate and the measured activity of the effluent stream as determined by sampling; and 3.17x108 isthe inverse ofthe numberofseconds per year.

)iiij is as previously defined. Refer to Table I 0, Table I I, and Table I 2 for applicability; Although the annual average relative concentration X/Q and the average relative deposition rate are generally considered to be at the approximate receptor location in lieu of the Site Boundary for these calculations, it is acceptable to consider the ingestion, inhalation, and ground plane pathways to coexist at the location of the nearest residence with the highest value ofX/Q 42 The Total Body dose from ground plane deposition is added to the dose for each individual organ.43 3.4. Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System The gaseous radwaste treatment system and the ventilation exhaust system are available for use whenever gaseous effluents require treatment prior to being released to the environment.

The gaseous radwaste treatment system is designed to allow for the retention of all gaseous fission products to be discharged from the reactor coolant system. The retention system 42 NUREG-0133, Section 5.3.1 43 Regulatory Guide 1.109, Appendix C, Section 1 Page22 of 85 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 consists of eight (8) waste gas decay tanks. Normally, waste gases will be retained for at least 60 days prior to discharge. When practicable, waste gas decay tanks are discharged outside the growing season or at night such that 14C released from the waste gas system will not be incorporated into the ingestion pathways and will result in a lower dose to the Member of the Public. For this purpose, the growing season is defined as April 1 through November 1.

These systems will provide reasonable assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents will be kept ALARA.

The Operability of the gaseous radwaste treatment system ensures this system will be available for use when gases require treatment prior to their release to the environment.

Operability is demonstrated through compliancewith REC 16.11.2.1, 16.11.2.2, and 16.11.2.3.

Projected doses (gamma air, beta air, and organ dose) due to gaseous effluents at or beyond the Site Boundary are determined each 31 days. The prior 31 day period is used to calculate compliance. This may be modified as appropriate to account for changes in radwaste treatment which may have a significant effect on the projected doses.

3.5. Gaseous Effluents Dose Factors The dose conversion factors were derived from the appropriate dose conversion factors in Regulatory Guide 1. I 09 and other sources as necessary.4546 Particulate nuclides with a half-life of less than 8 days are not considered.47 90Y, 140La, and 144Pr are included because the parent half-life is greater than 8 days, and equilibrium is assumed.

4. Dose and Dose Commitment from Uranium Fuel Cycle Sources 4.1. Calculation of Dose and Dose Commitment from Uranium Fuel Cycle Sources The annual dose or dose commitment to a Member of the Public for Uranium Fuel Cycle Sources is determined as:

Dose to the total body and internal organs due to gamma ray exposure from submersion in a cloud of radioactive noble gases, ground plane exposure, and direct radiation from the Unit, onsite storage of low-level radioactive waste, and outside storage tanks; Thyroid dose due to inhalation and ingestion of radioiodines; and Organ dose due to inhalation and ingestion of radioactive material.

It is assumed that total body dose from sources of gamma radiation irradiates internal body organs at the same numerical rate.48 44 Hammer, Gregory, R., Climate of Missouri, monograph available from the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) ofthe National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), January, 2006.

45 ZZ-78 46 ZZ-250 47 Inspection Report 50-483/92002 (DRSS) 48 NUREG-0543,Section III, page 8 Page23 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-OJ 003 Rev. 026 The dose from gaseous effluents is considered to be the summation of the dose at the individuals residence and the dose to the individual from activities within the Site Boundary.

Since the doses via liquid releases are very conservatively evaluated, there is reasonable assurance that no real individual will receive a significant dose from radioactive liquid release pathways. Therefore, only doses to individuals via airborne pathways and doses resulting from direct radiation are considered in determining compliance to 40 CFR 190.

There are no other Uranium Fuel Cycle Sources within 8 km of the Callaway Plant.

4.1.1.

Identification of the Member of the Public The Member of the Public is considered to be a real individual, including all persons not occupationally associated with the Callaway Plant, but who may use portions of the plant site for recreational or other purposes not associated with the plant.5° Accordingly, it is necessary to characterize this individual with respect to his utilization of areas both within and at or beyond the Site Boundary and identify, as far as possible, major assumptions which could be reevaluated if necessary to demonstrate continued compliance with 40 CFR 190 through the use of more realistic assumptions.5152 The evaluation of Total Dose from the Uranium Fuel Cycle should consider the dose to two Critical Receptors: (a) The Nearest Resident, and (b) The Critical Receptor within the Site Boundary.

4.1.2.

Total Dose to the Nearest Resident The dose to the Nearest Resident is due to plume exposure from noble gases, ground plane exposure, and inhalation and ingestion pathways. It is conservatively assumed that each ingestion pathway (meat, milk, and vegetation) exists at the location of the Nearest Resident.

49 NUREG-0543,Section IV, page 9 50 NUREG-0133, Section 3.8 51 NUREG-0543,Section IV, page 9 52 NUREG-0543, section NI, page 6 Page 24 of $8 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 It is assumed that direct radiation dose from operation of the Unit and storage of radioactive material, and dose from gaseous effluents due to activities within the Site Boundary is negligible for the Nearest Resident. The total Dose from the Uranium Fuel Cycle to the Nearest Resident is calculated using the methodology discussed in Section 3 for exposure to radioactive particulates, radioiodines, and tritium, using concurrent meteorological data for the location of the Nearest Resident with the highest value of XIQ. The following equation has been derived for calculating annual total body and internal organ dose from exposure to noble gas radionuclides, Dng, NR ng,NR = 317E

z K1Q1 Eq. 26 Where:

D9, NR 5 the total body dose in mrem, to the nearest resident from exposure to noble gas radionuclides released in gaseous effluents.

3.17x108 is the inverse of the number of seconds per year.

f is the occupancy factor for the nearest resident (i.e. I.00).

Qi is the release of noble gas radionuclides, i, in gaseous effluents, for all gaseous releases in pCi. Q is calculated as the product of ventilation flow rate and the measured activity of the effluent stream as determined by sampling.

(:7) and K1 are as previously defined.The location of the Nearest Resident in each meteorological sector is determined from the Annual Land Use Census conducted in accordance with the Requirements of REC 16.11.4.2.

4.1.3.

Total Dose to the Critical Receptor within the Site Boundary The Union Electric Company has entered into an agreement with the State of Missouri Department of Conservation for management of the residual lands surrounding the Callaway Plant, including some areas within the Site Boundary. Under the terms of this agreement, certain areas have been opened to the public for low intensity recreational uses (hunting, hiking, sightseeing, etc.) but recreational use is excluded in an area immediately surrounding the plant site (refer to Figure 4.1). Much of the residual lands within the Site Boundary are leased to area farmers by the Department of Conservation to provide income to support management and development costs. Activities conducted under these leases are primarily Page 25 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 comprised of farming (animal feed), grazing, and forestry. Crops for human consumption are specifically prohibited by the lease.535455 Based on the utilization of areas within the Site Boundary, it is reasonable to assume that the critical receptor within the Site Boundary is a farmer, and that his dose from activities within the Site Boundary is due to exposure incurred while conducting his farming activities. The previous tenant estimated that he spent approximately I I 00 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months per year working the farm plots of the Reform Conservation Area.56 Any reevaluation of assumptions should consider only real receptors and real pathways using realistic assumptions, and should include a reevaluation of the occupancy period at the locations of real exposure (e.g. a real individual would not simultaneously exist at each point of maximum exposure).

4. 1.3. 1.

Total Dose to the Farmer from Gaseous Effluents The Total Dose to the farmer from gaseous effluents is calculated for the adult age group using the methodology discussed in Section 3 for radioactive particulates, radioiodines, and tritium, utilizing historical meteorological data from Table I 0 for activities within the Site Boundary and corrected for the farmers occupancy (i.e. the ratio of 1 1 00 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months of farming activities within the Reform Conservation area in a year to 8760 total hours in a year). The following equation has been derived for calculating annual total body and internal organ dose from exposure to noble gas radionuclides, Dng, F:

Dng,f 3.17E o8(f0)((X/Q))

KQ Eq. 27 Where:

D9, F 5 the total body dose in mrem, to the farmer from exposure to noble gas radionuclides released in gaseous effluents.

3.17x108 is the inverse of the number of seconds per year.

10CC is the occupancy factor for the farmer which is the ratio of I I 00 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months of farming activities in a year to 8760 total hours in a year.

Qi is the release of noble gas radionuclides, i, in gaseous effluents, for all gaseous releases in pCi. Q is calculated as the product of ventilation flow rate and the measured activity of the effluent stream as determined by sampling.

53 Environmental Report, OLS, Section 2.12.3 54 Environmental Report, OLS, Section 2.1.3.3.4 55 Management Agreement for the Public Use of Lands, Exhibit A.

56 Private communication, H.C. Lindeman & B.F.Holderness, August 6, 1986 Page2G of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 (X7) and K are as previously defined.

The Reform Conservation Area farm plots are leased to several different farmers therefore there is no dose calculation for the farmers residence.

It is assumed that food ingestion pathways do not exist within the Site Boundary, therefore the gaseous effluents dose within the Site Boundary is due to plume exposure from Noble Gases and the ground plane and inhalation pathways.

4.1.3.1.1.

Direct Radiation Dose The direct radiation dose to the Member of Public due to activities within the Site Boundary is insignificant.5758 57 HPCI 1206 58 HPCI 1505 Page27 of 8$

INFORMATION USE June, 2021

OC%J 00 NG 0

LU

,-4 DO 0

z 0

-l-Z Q

0 0

0 Co CO 0

Co t%1 bO (0

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026

5. Radiological Environmental Monitoring 5.1. Description Of The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program is intended to provide background data for pre-operation and to supplement the radiological effluent release monitoring program during plant operation. Radiation exposure to the public from the various specific pathways and direct radiation is evaluated by this program.

Some deviations from the sampling frequency may be necessary due to seasonal unavailability, hazardous conditions, or other legitimate reasons. Efforts are made to obtain all required samples within the required time frame. Any deviation(s) in sampling frequency or location is documented in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report.

Sampling, reporting, and analytical requirements are given in FSAR-SP Tables 16.11-7, 16.11-8, and 16.11-9.

Airborne, waterborne, direct radiation, and ingestion samples collected under the monitoring program are analyzed by an independent, third-party laboratory. With the exception of direct radiation, the laboratory is required to participate in an Interlaboratory Analyses Program per Reg. Guide The laboratory participates in an Interlaboratory crosscheck program administered by Environmental Resources Associates (ERA), Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP), or equivalent program. This participation includes all of the determinations (sample medium - radionuclide combination) that are both offered by ERA and/or MAPEP and are also included in the environmental monitoring program.

5.2. Performance Testing Of Environmental Thermoluminescence Dosimeters Dosimeters used for monitoring of direct radiation dose in the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program are tested for accuracy and precision to demonstrate compliance with the applicable portions of Regulatory Guide 4.13.

6. Annual Average Atmospheric Dispersion Parameters 6.1. Annual Atmospheric Dispersion Parameters The dispersion values presented in Table I 0 were determined through the analysis of five years of on-site meteorological data.6° The straight-line Gaussian dispersion model XOQDOQ61 was used for determination of the long-term atmospheric dispersion parameters.

A more detailed discussion of the methodology and input data utilized to calculate these parameters can be found in HPCI 1503.

6.1.1.

Determination of Dispersion Estimates for Special Receptor Locations 59 Regulatory Guide 4.15, rev. 1, section 6.3.2 60 1503 61 NUREG/CR2919 Page 29 of 8$

INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 XOQDOQ is utilized to obtain dispersion paramters for 22 standard distances. Dispersion parameters at the Site Boundary and at special receptor locations are estimated by logarithmic interpolation according to:62 x=x1 (d/d1)B Eq. 28 Where:

B (x2/x1)

In (d2/d1)

Eq. 29 xl, x2 are the atmospheric dispersion parameters at distance d1and d2, respectively, from the source. The distances d1 and d2 are selected such that they satisfy the relationship d1<d<d2.

6.1.2.

Atmospheric Dispersion Parameters for Farming Areas within the Site Boundary The dispersion parameters for farming areas within the Site Boundary are intended for a narrow scope application; that of calculating the dose to the current farmer3 from gaseous effluents while he conducts farming activities within the Site Boundary.

For the purpose of these calculations, it was assumed that all of the farmers time, approximately I I 00 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months per year, is spent on croplands of the Reform Conservation Area, including plots within the Site Boundary, and that his time is divided among the plots proportional to the acreage of each plot. Fractional acreage/time-weighted dispersion parameters were calculated for each plot as described in HPCI 1502. The weighted dispersion parameters for each plot were summed (according to type) in order to produce a composite value of the dispersion parameters which are presented in Table 10. These dispersion parameters therefore represent the distributed activities of the farmer within the Site Boundary and his estimated occupancy period.

6.2. Annual Meteorological Data Processing The annual atmospheric dispersion parameters utilized in the calculation of doses for demonstration of compliance with the numerical dose objectives of I 0 CFR 50, Appendix I, are determined using XQQDOQ.64 Multiple sensors are utilized to ensure 90% valid data recovery for the wind speed, wind direction, and ambient air temperature parameters as required by Regulatory Guide I.23. The selection hierarchy is presented in Table I 3.

The input parameters to XOQDOQ are documented in HPCI 1503.

62 FSAR-SA 2.3.5.2.1.2 63 The farming plots are leased by the Missouri Department of Conservation to multiple farmers through a bidding process. This represents a composite of those persons farming the plots within the Site Boundary.

64 NUREG/CR-2919 Page 30 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 A quality check of the meteorological data is performed prior to processing to ensure the validity of the calculated dispersion parameters.

7. Reporting Requirements 7.1. Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report The reporting requirements for the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (AREOR) have been relocated to FSAR-SP I 6. 1 1.5.1.

7.2. Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report The reporting requirements for the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report (ARERR) have been relocated to FSAR-SP 16.11.5.2. The application of atmospheric dispersion parameters in the ARERR is presented in Table 12.

8. Radioactive Effluent Controls (REC)

The Radioactive Effluent Controls were relocated to FSAR-SP Chapter 16.11, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Radioactive Effluent Controls. The former ODCM REC numbers appear on each ofthe RECs in FSAR-SP Chapter 16.11, and may be used as a cross-reference between the previous and the current numbering system if necessary.

9. Administrative Controls 9.1. Major Changes to Liquid and Gaseous Radwaste Treatment Systems A summary of Licensee-initiated major changes to the Radwaste Treatment Systems (liquid and gaseous) must be reported to the Commission in the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report (ARERR) for the period in which the evaluation was reviewed by the On-Site Review Committee (ORC). On site documentation must contain:

A summary of the evaluation that led to the determination that the change could be made in accordance with I 0 CFR 50.59; Sufficient detailed information to totally support the reason for the change without benefit of additional or supplemental information; A detailed description of the equipment, components and process involved and the interfaces with other plant systems; An evaluation of the change, which shows the predicted releases of radioactive materials in liquid and gaseous effluents that differ from those previously predicted in the License application and amendments thereto; An evaluation of the change, which shows the expected maximum exposures to a Member ofthe Public in the Unrestricted Area and to the general population that differ from those previously estimated in the License application and amendments thereto; Page3l of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 A comparison of the predicted releases of radioactive materials, in liquid and gaseous effluents, to the actual releases for the period prior to when the changes are to be made; An estimate of the exposure to plant operating personnel as a result of the change; and Documentation of the fact that the change was reviewed and found acceptable by the ORC.

Changes to the Radwaste Treatment Systems shall become effective upon review and approval by the CRC.

9.2. Changes to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM)

All changes to the ODCM shall be performed pursuant to T/S AC 5.5.1 Review for each revision of the ODCM must include the Radiation Protection Department.

I 0. Bibliography ANSI N42.18-2004, Specification & Performance of On-Site Instrumentation for Continuously Monitoring Radioactivity in Effluents. (2004)

CAR 200700053

Missouri River Low Flow Trend for 2006, Attachments: Phase 1 Final Draft CDP-ZZ-00200, Appendix B, Primary Plant Systems Tables, rev. 41

. April, 2018.

Certificate of Compliance No. I 040, Appendix A, Technical Specifications for the HI-STORM UMAX Canister Storage System. April, 2015.

EGG-PHY-9703, Technical Evaluation Report for the evaluation of ODCM Revision 0 (May, 1990) Callaway Plant, Unit 1, transmitted via letter, Samuel J. Collins (USNRC) to D. F.

Schnell (UE), dated July 12, 1996.

EPRI TR-1 021 1 06, Estimation of 14C in Nuclear Power Plant Effluents, December, 2010 Generic Letter 89-01, Guidance for the Implementation of Programmatic Controls for RETS in the Administrative Controls Section of Technical Specifications and the Relocation of Procedural Details of Current RETS to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual or Process Control Program, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (1989)

Hammer, Gregory, R., Climate of Missouri, monograph available from the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

January, 2006 HPCI 8403, Setpoints and Associated Bases for Process and Effluent Radioactivity Monitors (SP System). June, 1984.

Page32 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 HPCI 8710, Methodology for Calculating the Response of Gross NaI(TI) Monitors to Liquid Effluent Streams, rev. I, April, 2005.

HPCI 8902, Calculation of QDCM Dose Commitment Factors, rev. 0. September, 1989.

HPCI 9605, Calculation of Maximum Background Value for HB-RE-18, rev.0. September, I 996 HPCI 9905, Calculation of Setpoint for GL-RE-202, rev.0. April, 1999.

HPCI 0406 Calculation of Liquid Effluent Dose Commitment Factors (A) for the Adult Age Group, rev. 1. November, 2004.

HPCI 0509, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) Calculation of Direct Dose from RAM Storage at Stores II, rev. 0. April, 2005.

HPCI 0510, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) Calculation of Direct Dose from RAM Storage in the Radwaste Yard, rev. 0. April, 2005.

HPCI 0601, Equipment Hatch Platform and Missile Shield Modification Direct Dose Calculation to the Member of the Public, rev. 0. January, 2006.

HPCI 1003, Evaluation ofthe 2010 Land Use Census, rev. 0. December, 2010.

HPCI I I 02, Dose to the Member of the Public from the Release of 14C in Gaseous Effluents for2OlO, rev.0. July, 2011.

HPCI I 206, Evaluation of Direct Radiation Dose to the Member of the Public Due to Activities within the site Boundary, rev. 0. August, 2012.

HPCI I 502, Atmospheric Dispersion Parameters for Activities Inside the Site Boundary, rev.

1. October, 2020.

HPCI 1 503, Calculation of Long-Term Meteorological Dispersion Parameters, rev. 1

. April, 2015 HPCI 1504, Evaluation ofthe 2014 Annual Land Use Census, rev. 1. March, 2015 HPCI I 505, Evaluation of Direct Radiation Dose to the Member of the Public from the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Facility, rev. I. July, 2015.

HPCI 1508, Evaluation ofthe 2015 Land Use Census, rev.0. March, 2016.

HPCI I 604, Calculation of 126Sb Ingestion Dose Commitment Factors (AT), rev. I. January, 2018.

HPCI 1802, Calculation of 1l7m5n Dose Commitment Factors (AIT)and Effluents Management Software (EMS) Nuclide Data for Liquid Effluents, rev. 0. May, 2018.

Page33 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 IAEA Technical Reports Series no. 421, Management of Waste Containing Tritium and Carbon-14, 2004 Internal USNRC memo, F. J. Congel to V. L. Miller, et al, dated April 17, 1992.

Kunz, C., Carbon-14 Discharge at Three Light-Water Reactors, Health Physics, vol. 49, pages25-35, 1985 LDCN 18-0006, Remove BMRE52 from FSAR-SP Tables 16.1 1-2 and 16.1 1-3, BT 201805280 Letter, F. J. Congel to J. F. Schmidt, dated April 23, 1992.

Letter, F. J. Congel to J. F. Schmidt, dated December 9, 1991.

Letter, F. J. Congel to J. F. Schmidt, dated June 8, 1993.

Letter, F. J. Congel to J. F. Schmidt, dated September 14, 1992.

Management Agreement for the Public Use of Lands, Union Electric Company and the State of Missouri Department of Conservation, January 1 5, 2009.

Memo, F. J. Congel, Eigth Set of Questions and Answers on I 0 CFR Part 20, May 26, 1994.

Modification MP 19-01 14, Retire BMREOO52. October 7, 2019.

NCRP Report 81, Carbon-14 in the Environment, January 1985 Neeb, Karl-Heinz, The Radiochemistry of Nuclear Power Plants with Light Water Reactors, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1997 NEO-54, memo, D. W. Capone to S. E. Miltenberger, dated January 5, 1983; Union Electric Company correspondence.

NUREG-0017, Calculation of Releases of Radioactive Materials in Gaseous and Liquid Effluents from Pressurized Water Reactors PWR-GALE Code, April, 1985 NUREG-0133, Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specification for Nuclear Power Plants, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (1978)

NUREG-0543, Methods for Demonstrating LWR Compliance with the EPA Uranium Fuel Cycle Standard (40 CFR Part 190), U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (1980)

NUREG-1 301, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Guidance: Standard Radiological Effluent Controls for Pressurized Water Reactors, Generic Letter 89-01, Supplement No. I, April, I 991 NUREG/CR-291 9, XOQDOQ, Computer Program For the Meteorological Evaluation of Routine Effluent Releases at Nuclear Power Stations, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (1982)

Page 34 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 NUREG/CR-6204, Questions and Answers Based on Revised JO CFR 20, May, 1994 Regulatory Guide I.109, Calculation ofAnnual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purposes of Evaluating Compliance with 1 0 CFR Part 50, Appendix I, Revision 1, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (1977)

Regulatory Guide I.1 11, Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water-Cooled Reactors, Revision 1, U. S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (1977)

Regulatory Guide I.21, Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactive Material in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents and Solid Waste, (Revision 2), U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

(2009)

Regulatory Guide 4.13, Performance, Testing, and procedural specifications for Thermoluminescence Dosimetry: Environmental Applications (Revision 1), U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (1977)

Regulatory Guide 4.15, Quality Assurance for Radiological Monitoring Programs (Normal Operations)

Effluent Streams and the Environment (Revision 1), U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (1979)

State of Missouri National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit MO-0098001, Ameren Missouri Callaway Energy Center, July 1, 2020.

Statements of Consideration, Federal Register, Vol. 56, No. 98, Tuesday, May 21, 1991, Subpart D, page 23374.

Title I 0, Energy, Chapter 1, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 20; U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.

Title I 0, Energy, Chapter 1, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 72, Subpart F; U.S.

Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.

Title 10, Energy, Chapter 1, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, Appendix I; U.S.

Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.

Title 40, Protection of Environment, Chapter 1, Code of Federal Regulations, Part I 90; U.S.

Government Print Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.

Union Electric Company Callaway Plant Environmental Report, Operating License Stage Union Electric Company Callaway Plant, Unit I, Final Safety Analysis Report-Standard Plant UOTH 83-58, Documentation of ODCM Dose Factors and Parameters. (1983)

UOTH 20200008, Justification to support removal of Radiation Monitor BM-RE-052 from FSAR-SP Chapter 16.1 1. (2020)

Page3S of $8 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 USNRC Inspection Report 50-483192002(DRSS), Section 5, page 5.

Westinghouse Calculation Note CN-TA-02-1 35, Callaway (SCP) RSG IGOR/RETRAN Base Deck, May 16, 2003 ZZ-250, Rev. I, ODCM Gaseous Pathway Dose Factors for Child Age Group and Ground Plane Dose Factors. (1998)

ZZ-48, Calculation of Inhalation and Ingestion Dose Commitment Factors for the Adult and Child. (1988)

ZZ-57, Dose Factors for Eu-154. (1989)

ZZ-78, Rev. 2, ODCM Gaseous Pathway Dose Factors for Adult Age Group. (1992)

Page 36 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

Table 1: Ingestion Dose Commitment Values (4) for Adult Age Group65 APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 (mrem/hr) per (.tCi/mt)

Total Nuclide Bone Liver Body Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLl 3H O.OOE+OO 2.26E-O1 2.26E-O1 2.26E-O1 2.26E-O1 2.26E-O1 2.26E-O1 7Be 1.31E-02 2.98E-02 1.45E-02 O.OOE+OO 3.15E-02 O.OOE+OO 5.17E+OO 24Na 4.07E+02 4.07E+02 4.07E+02 4.07E+02 4.07E+02 4.07E+02 4.07E+02 51Cr O.OOE÷OO O.OOE+OO 1.27E+OO 7.61E-O1 2.81E-O1 1.69E+OO 3.20E+02 54Mn O.OOE÷OO 4.38E+03 8.35E÷02 O.OOE÷OO 1.30E+03 O.OOE+OO 1.34E÷04 56Mn O.OOE+OO 1.1OE÷02 1.95E+O1 O.OOE+OO 1.40E+02 O.OOE+OO 3.51E+03 55Fe 6.58E+02 4.55E+02 1.06E÷02 O.OOE+OO O.OOE÷OO 2.54E+02 2.61E÷02 59Fe 1.04E+03 2.44E+03 9.36E+02 O.OOE÷OO O.OOE÷OO 6.82E÷02 8.14E+03 57Co O.OOE+OO 2.09E+O1 3.4$E÷O1 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 5.31E+02 58Co O.OOE+OO 8.92E+O1 2.OOE+02 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 1.81E+03 60Co O.OOE+OO 2.56E+02 5.65E+02 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 4.81E+03 63N1 3.11E+04 2.16E÷03 1.04E+03 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 4.50E+02 65N1 L26E÷02 164E÷O1 7.49E÷OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE÷OO O.OOE÷OO 4.17E+02 MCu O.OOE+OO 9.97E+OO 4.68E+OO O.OOE+OO 2.51E+O1 O.OOE+OO 8.50E+02 65Zn 2.32E+04 7.37E+04 3.33E+04 O.OOE÷OO 4.93E÷04 O.OOE+OO 4.64E+04 69Zn 4.93E+O1 9.43E+O1 6.56E+OO O.OOE+OO 6.13E+O1 O.OOE+OO 1.42E÷O1 82Br O.OOE+OO O.OOE÷OO 2.27E+03 O.OOE+OO O.OOE÷OO O.OOE+OO 2.60E÷03 83Br O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 4.04E+O1 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 5.82E+O1 84Br O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 5.24E+O1 O.OOE÷OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 4.11E-04 85Br O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 2.15E+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 1.O1E-15 86Rb O.OOE+OO 1.O1E+05 4.71E÷04 O.OOE÷OO O.OOE÷OO O.OOE+OO 1.99E+04 88Rb O.OOE+OO 2.90E÷02 1.54E+02 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 4.OOE-09 89Rb O.OOE+OO 1.92E÷02 1.35E+02 O.OOE÷OO O.OOE÷OO O.OOE÷OO 1.12E-11 895r 2.21E+04 O.OOE+OO 6.35E+02 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 3.55E+03 90Sr 5.44E+O5 O.OOE+OO 1.34E÷05 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 1.57E+04 91Sr 4.07E+02 O.OOE+OO 1.64E+O1 O.OOE÷OO O.OOE÷OO O.OOE+OO 1.94E÷03 92Sr 1.54E÷02 O.OOE÷OO 6.68E+OO O.OOE÷OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 3.06E+03 90Y 5.76E-O1 O.OOE+OO 1.54E-02 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 6.1OE+03 9lrny 5.44E-03 O.OOE+OO 2.11E-04 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 1.60E-02 91Y 8.44E+OO O.OOE+OO 2.26E-O1 O.OOE+OO O.OOE÷OO O.OOE+OO 4.64E÷03 92y 5.06E-02 O.OOE+OO 1.48E-03 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 8.86E+02 93Y 1.60E-O1 O.OOE+OO 4.43E-03 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 5.09E+03 95Zr 2.40E-O1 7.70E-02 5.21E-02 O.OOE+OO 121E-O1 O.OOE+OO 2.44E+02 Page 37 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Table 1: Ingestion Dose Commitment Values (Aft) for Adult Age Group (mrem/hr) per (iCi/ml)

Total Nuclide Bone Liver Body Thyroid Kidney Lung Gl-LLI 97Zr 1.33E-02 2.6$E-03 1.22E-03 O.OOE+OO 4.04E-03 O.OOE+OO 8.30E+02 95Nb 4.47E+02 2.48E+02 1.34E+02 O.OOE+OO 2.46E+02 O.OOE+OO 1.51E+06 99Mo O.OOE+OO 1.03E÷02 1.96E+O1 O.OOE÷OO 2.34E+02 O.OOE+OO 2.39E+02 99mTc 8.87E-03 2.51E-02 3.19E-O1 O.OOE+OO 3.81E-O1 1.23E-02 1.48E+O1

°Tc 9.12E-03 t3lE-02 1.29E-O1 O.OOE+OO 2.37E-O1 6.72E-03 3.95E44

°3Ru 4.43E+OO O.OOE+OO 1.91E+OO O.OOE+OO 1.69E+O1 O.OOE+OO 5.17E+02

°5Ru 3.69E-O1 O.OOE+OO 1.46E-O1 O.OOE+OO 4.76E+OO O.OOE÷OO 2.26E+02

°6Ru 6.58E+O1 O.OOE÷OO 8.33E+OO O.OOE+OO 1.27E+02 O.OOE+OO 4.26E+03 109cd O.OOE+OO 5.55E+02 1.94E+O1 O.OOE+OO 5.31E+02 O.OOE+OO 5.60E+03

°mAg 8.85E-O1 8.18E-O1 4.86E-O1 O.OOE÷OO 1.61E÷OO O.OOE+OO 3.34E+02 l13 5.67E+04 1.61E÷03 3.26E+03 9.19E+02 O.OOE÷OO O.OOE÷OO 169E+05 ll7m5 2.79E÷03 1.62E+02 6.99E+02 5.21E+O1 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 225b 5.48E-O1 1.12E-02 1.66E-O1 7.73E-03 O.OOE+OO 2.94E-O1 O.OOE+OO 245b 6.70E+OO 1.27E-O1 2.66E+OO 1.63E-02 O.OOE÷OO 5.22E+OO 1.90E+02 255b 4.29E+OO 4.79E-02 1.02E+OO 4.36E-03 O.OOE+OO 3.30E+OO 4.72E+O1 26$b 2.75E+OO 5.59E-02 9.92E-O1 1.68E-02 O.OOE+OO 1.68E+OO 2.25E+02 l27mTe 6.48E+03 2.32E+03 7.90E+02 1.66E+03 2.63E+04 O.OOE÷OO 2.17E÷04 27Te 1.05E+02 3.78E+O1 2.28E+O1 7.80E+O1 4.29E+02 O.OOE+OO 8.31E+03 l29mTe 1.1OE÷04 4.11E+03 1.74E+03 3.78E÷03 4.60E+04 O.OOE+OO 5.54E+04 29Te 3.O1E+O1 1.13E+O1 7.33E+OO 2.31E+O1 1.26E+02 O.OOE+OO 2.27E+O1 l3lmTe 1.66E+03 8.1OE+02 6.75E+02 1.28E÷03 8.21E+03 O.OOE÷OO 8.04E÷04 131Te 1.89E+O1 7.$8E+OO 5.96E+OO 1.55E+O1 8.26E+O1 O.OOE÷OO 2.67E+OO 32Te 2.41E+03 1.56E+03 1.47E+03 1.72E+03 1.50E+04 O.OOE+OO 7.38E+04

°i 2.71E+O1 8.O1E+O1 3.16E+O1 6.79E+03 1.25E+02 O.OOE+OO 6.89E+O1 i

1.49E+02 2.14E+02 1.22E+02 7.OOE+04 3.66E+02 O.OOE÷OO 5.64E+O1 1321 7.29E+OO 1.95E+O1 6.82E÷OO 682E+02 3.11E÷O1 O.OOE+OO 3.66E÷OO i

5.14E+O1 8.87E+O1 2.70E+O1 1.30E+04 1.55E+02 O.OOE+OO 7.97E+O1 i

3.81E+OO 1.03E+O1 3.70E+OO 1.79E+02 1.64E+O1 O.OOE+OO 9.O1E-03 i

1.59E+O1 4.17E+O1 1.54E÷O1 2.75E+03 6.68E+O1 O.OOE÷OO 4.70E+O1 34Cs 2.98E+05 7.09E+05 5.79E+05 O.OOE+OO 2.29E+05 7.61E÷04 124E+04 36Cs 3.12E÷04 1.23E+05 8.86E+04 O.OOE+OO 6.85E+04 9.38E÷03 1.40E÷04 37Cs 3.82E+05 5.22E+05 3.42E+05 O.OOE+OO 1.77E÷05 5.89E+04 1.O1E+04 38Cs 2.64E+02 5.22E+02 2.59E+02 O.OOE+OO 3.84E+02 3.79E+O1 2.23E-03 39Ba 9.29E-O1 6.62E-04 2.72E-02 O.OOE÷OO 6.19E-04 3.75E-04 1.65E÷OO 65 UOTH 83-58, Calculation 88-002-00-F, ZZ-48, ZZ-57, ZZ-78, HPCI 8902, HPCI 0406, HPCI 1604, HPCI 1802.

Page 38 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

Table 1: Ingestion Dose Commitment Values (Aft) for Adult Age Group (mrem/hr) per (.tCi/mI)

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Total Nuclide Bone Liver Bod Thyroid Kidney Lung Gl-LLI 140Ba 1.94E+02 2.44E-O1 1.27E+O1 O.OOE÷OO 8.30E-02 1.40E-O1 4.OOE+02 41Ba 4.51E-O1 3.41E-04 1.52E-02 O.OOE+OO 3.17E-04 1.93E-04 2.13E-1O 42Ba 2.04E-O1 2.1OE-04 1.28E-02 O.OOE+OO 1.77E-04 1.19E-04 2.87E-19 40La 1.50E-O1 7.54E-02 1.99E-02 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 5.54E+03 42La 7.66E-03 3A8E-03 8.68E-04 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 2.54E÷O1 141Ce 2.24E-02 1.52E-02 1.72E-03 O.OOE÷OO 7.04E-03 O.OOE+OO 5.79E+O1 43Ce 3.95E-03 2.92E+OO 3.23E-04 O.OOE+OO 1.29E-03 O.OOE+OO 1.09E+02 Ce 1.17E+OO 4.88E-O1 6.27E-02 O.OOE+OO 2.90E-O1 O.OOE+OO 3.95E+02 43Pr 5.51E-O1 2.21E-O1 2.73E-02 O.OOE+OO 1.27E-O1 O.OOE+OO 2.41E+03 44Pr 1.80E-03 7.48E-04 916E-05 O.OOE+OO 4.22E-04 O.OOE+OO 2.59E-1O 47Nd 3.76E-O1 4.35E-O1 2.60E-02 O.OOE+OO 254E-O1 O.OOE+OO 2.09E+03 54Eu 3.68E+O1 4.52E+OO 3.22E+OO O.OOE+OO 2.17E+O1 O.OOE+OO 3.28E+03 81Hf 4.OOE-02 1.94E-O1 1.80E-02 O.OOE+OO 4.1$E-02 O.OOE+OO 2.21E+02 187w 2.96E+02 2.47E+02 8.65E+O1 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 8.1OE+04 237Np 3.28E+04 2.85E+03 1.33E+03 O.OOE+OO 9.86E+03 O.OOE+OO 1.90E+03 239Np 2.$5E-02 2.80E-03 1.54E-03 O.OOE+OO 8.74E-03 O.OOE+OO 5.75E+02 238Pu 5.70E+03 8.03E÷02 1.43E+02 O.OOE÷OO 6.13E+02 O.OOE+OO 6.12E+02 239pu*

6.59E÷03 8.88E+02 1.60E+02 O.OOE+OO 6.80E+02 O.OOE+OO 5.68E+02 241p 1.38E+02 7.07E+OO 2.78E+OO O.OOE+OO 1.28E÷O1 O.OOE+OO 1.17E+O1 241Am 4.90E÷04 1.72E+04 3.24E+03 O.OOE÷OO 2A4E+04 O.OOE+OO 4.44E+03 242Cm L23E+03 L26E+03 8.20E+O1 O.OOE÷OO 372E÷02 O.OOE+OO 4.74E÷03 243Cm**

3.82E÷04 1.44E+04 2.24E+03 O.OOE+OO 1.05E+04 O.OOE÷OO 4.67E+03

IncIudes 240Pu contribution

- Includes 244Cm contribution Page 39 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

Table 2: Bloaccumulation Factor fBI1) 66 (pCi/kg) per (pCi/liter)

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 66Valueslrom Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1, TableA-1 and HPCI 0406.

Page 40 of 8$

INFORMATION USE June, 2021 Element Bf1 Fish (Freshwater)

H 9.OE-01 Be 2.OE+00 Na 1.OE+02 Cr 2.OE÷02 Mn 4.OE+02 Fe 1.OE+02 Co 5.OE+01 Ni 1.OE+02 Cu 5.OE+01 Zn 2.OE+03 Br 4.2E÷02 Rb 2.OE+03 Sr 3.OE+01 Y

2.5E+01 Zr 3.3E÷00 Nb 3.OE+04 Mo 1.OE+01 Ic 1.5E+01 Ru 1.OE+01 Element Bf Fish (Freshwater)

Rh 1.OE+01 Ag 2.3E+00 Cd 2.OE+02 Sn 3.OE+03 Sb 1.OE+00 Te 4.OE+02 I

1.5E+01 Cs 2.OE+03 Ba 4.OE+00 La 2.5E+01 Ce 1.OE+00 Pr 2.5E+01 Nd 2.5E+01 Eu 2.5E+01 Hf 3.3E+00 w

1.2E+03 Np 1.OE+01 Pu 3.5E+00 Am 2.5E+01 Cm 2.5E+01

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Table 3: Dose Factor for Exposure to a Semi-Infinite Cloud of Noble Gases67 Total Body Dose Factor Skin Dose Factor Gamma Air Dose Factor Beta Air Dose Factor Radionuclide K

1 M1 Ni (mrem/yr) per (iCi/m3)

(mrem/yr) per (tCi/m3) fmrad/yr) per (iCi/m3)

(mrad/yr) per (tCi/m3) s3mKr 7.56 E-02 1.93 E+01 2.88 E+02 s5mKr 1.17E+03 1.46E+03 1.23 E+03 1.97 E+03 85Kr 1.61 E+O1 1.34 E+03 1.72 E+O1 1.95 E+03 87Kr 5.92 E+03 9.73 E+03 6.17 E+03 1.03 E+04 88Kr 1.47 E+04 2.37 E+03 1.52 E+04 2.93 E+03 89Kr 1.66 E+04 1.01 E+04 1.73 E+04 1.06 E+04 90Kr 1.56 E+04 7.29 E+03 1.63 E+04 7.83 E+03 l3lmXe 9.15E+O1 4.76E+02 1.56E+02 Lii E+03 l33mXe 2.5i E+02 9.94 E+02 3.27 E+02 i.48 E+03 133Xe 2.94 E÷02 3.06 E+02 3.53 E+02 i.05 E÷03 l35mXe 3.i2E+03 7.iiE+02 3.36E+03 7.39 E+02 135Xe i.81 E÷03 i.86 E+03 i.92 E+03 2.46 E÷03 137Xe i.42 E+03 i.22 E÷04 i.5i E+03 i.27 E÷04 38Xe 8.83 E+03 4.i3 E+03 9.2i E+03 4.75 E+03 41Ar 8.84 E÷03 2.69 E+03 9.30 E÷03 3.2$ E÷03 67 Values from Reg. Guide 1.109, Table B-i multiplied by a units conversion factor of iE6 to convert from pCi to jiCi.

Page 41 of 8$

INFORMATION USE June, 2021

Table 4: Ground Plane Pathway Dose Factors (Rj68 (m2mrem/yr) per (iCi/sec)

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Page 42 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021 Nuclide Total Body Skin 3H 0.OOE+OO 0.OOE÷00 7Be 2.24E+07 3.21E+07 51Cr 4.66E+06 5.51E+06 54Mn 1.39E+09 1.63E+09 55Fe 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 59Fe 2.73E+0$

3.21E+08 57Co 2.98E+08 4.37E+08 58Co 3.79E÷08 4.44E+08 60Co 2.15E+10 2.53E+10 63N1 0.OOE+O0 0.OOE+00 65Zn 7.47E+0$

8.59E+0$

86Rb 8.99E+06 1.03E+07 89Sr 2.16E+04 2.51E+04 905r 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+0O 90Y 5.36E+06 6.32E+06 91Y 1.07E+06 1.21E+06 95Zr 2.45E+08 2.84E+08 95Nb 2.50E+08 2.94E+08 103Ru 1.08E+08 1.26E+08 106Ru 4.22E+0$

5.07E÷08 110mAg 3.44E+09 4.O1E÷09

°9cd 3.76E+07 1.54E+08 Nuclide Total Body Skin ll35 1.43E+07 4.09E+07 245b 8.74E+08 1.23E+09 1255b 3.57E+09 5.19E+09 l27mTe 9.17E÷04 1.08E+05 l29mTe 1.98E+07 2.31E+07 3°i 5.51E+06 6.69E+06 1311 1.72E+07 2.09E+07 1321 1.25E+06 1.47E÷06 l

2.45E+06 2.9$E+06 1341 4.47E+05 5.31E+05 1351 2.53E+06 2.95E+06 134Cs 6.85E+09 8.OOE+09 36Cs 1.51E+08 1.71E+08 137Cs 1.03E+1O 1.20E+10 140Ba 2.05E+07 2.35E+07 40La 1.47E+08 t66E+08 41Ce 1.37E+07 1.54E+07 1Ce 6.96E+07 8.04E+07 43Pr 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 44Pr 4.35E+07 5.OOE+07 47Nd

$.39E+06 1.O1E+07 154Eu 2.21E+1O 3.15E+10 81H1 1.97E+08 2.82E+08 68 ZZ-250, rev. 1

Table 5: Child inhalation Pathway Dose Factors fR1)69 (mrem/yr) per (iCi/m3)

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Nuclide Bone Liver Total Body Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI 3H 0.OOE+00 1.12E+03 1.12E+03 1.12E+03 1.12E+03 1.12E÷03 1.12E+03 7Be 8.47E+02 1.44E+03 9.25E+02 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 6.47E+04 2.55E+03 51Cr 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.54E+02 8.55E+01 2.43E+01 1.70E+04 1.08E+03 54Mn 0.OOE+00 4.29E+04 9.51E+03 0.OOE+00 1.OOE+04 1.52E÷06 2.29E+04 55Fe 4.74E+04 2.52E+04 7.77E+03 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.11E+05 2.87E+03 59Fe 2.07E+04 3.34E+04 1.67E+04 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.27E+06 7.07E+04 57Co 0.OOE+00 9.03E+02 1.07E+03 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 5.07E+05 1.32E+04 58Co 0.OOE+00 1.77E+03 3.16E+03 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.11E+06 3.44E+04 60Co 0.OOE+00 1.31E+04 2.26E+04 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 7.07E+06 9.62E+04 63N1 8.21E+05 4.63E+04 2.$OE+04 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+O0 2.75E+05 6.33E+03 65Zn 4.25E+04 1.13E+05 7.03E+04 0.OOE+00 7.14E+04 9.95E+05 1.63E+04 86Rb 0.OOE+00 1.98E+05 L14E+05 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 7.99E+03 89Sr 5.99E+05 0.OOE+00 1.72E+04 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 2.16E+06 1.67E+05 90Sr 1.O1E+08 O.OOE+00 6.44E+06 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.48E+07 3.43E+05 90Y 4.11E+03 0.OOE+00 1.11E+02 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 2.62E+05 2.68E+05 91Y 9.14E+05 0.OOE+00 2.44E+04 0.OOE÷00 0.OOE+00 2.63E+06 L84E÷05 95Zr 1.90E+05 4.18E+04 3.70E+04 0.OOE+00 5.96E+04 2.23E+06 6.11E+04 95Nb 2.35E+04 9.18E+03 6.55E+03 0.OOE+00 8.62E+03 6.14E+05 3.70E+04

°3Ru 2.79E+03 0.OOE+00 1.07E+03 0.OOE+00 7.03E+03 6.62E+05 4.48E+04 106Ru 1.36E+05 0.OOE+00 1.69E+04 0.OOE+00 1.84E+05 1.43E+07 4.29E+05 10mAg 1.69E÷04 1.14E+04 9.14E÷03 0.OOE+00 2.12E÷04 5.48E+06 1.OOE+05 109cd 0.OOE+00 5.48E+05 2.59E+04 0.OOE+00 4.96E+05 1.05E+06 2.78E+04

ll3, 1.13E+05 3.12E+03 8.62E+03 2.33E+03 0.OOE+00 1.46E+06 2.26E+05 1245b 5.74E+04 7.40E+02 2.OOE+04 1.26E+02 0.OOE+00 3.24E+06 L64E+05 255b 9.84E+04 7.59E+02 2.07E+04 9.1OE+01 0.OOE+00 2.32E+06 4.03E+04 27mTe 2.49E+04 8.55E+03 3.02E+03 6.07E+03 6.36E+04 1.48E+06 7.14E+04 l29mTe 1.92E+04 6.85E+03 3.04E+03 6.33E÷03 5.03E÷04 1.76E+06 1.82E+05 Page 43 of 8$

INFORMATION USE June, 2021 69 ZZ-250, rev. 1

Table 5: Child Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors fRi)

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 (mrem/yr) per (.tCi/m3)

Nuclide Bone Liver Total Body Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI 30i 8.18E+03 1.64E+04

$.44E+03 1.85E+06 2.45E+04 0.OOE+00 5.11E+03 1311 4.81E+04 4.81E+04 2.73E+04 1.62E÷07 7.$8E+04 0.OOE÷00 2.84E+03 1321 2.12E+03 4.07E+03 1.88E+03 1.94E÷05 6.25E÷03 O.OOE÷OO 3.20E+03 l

1.66E+04 2.03E+04 7.70E+03 3.85E+06 3.38E+04 0.OOE+00 5.48E+03 1341 1.17E+03 2.16E+03 9.95E+02 5.07E+04 3.30E+03 O.OOE+OO 9.55E+02 i

4.92E+03 8.73E+03 4.14E+03 7.92E+05 1.34E+04 0.OOE+00 4.44E+03 134Cs 6.51E+05 1.O1E+06 2.25E+05 0.OOE+00 3.30E+05 1.21E+05 3.85E+03 136Cs 6.51E+04 1.71E+05 1.16E+05 0.OOE+00 9.55E+04 1.45E+04 4.18E+03 137Cs 9.07E+05 8.25E+05 1.28E+05 0.OOE+00 2.82E+05 1.04E+05 3.62E+03 40Ba 7.40E+04 6.48E+01 4.33E+03 0.OOE+00 2.11E+01 1.74E+06 1.02E+05 140La 6.44E+02 2.25E+02 7.55E+01 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.83E+05 2.26E+05 141Ce 3.92E+04 1.95E+04 2.90E+03 0.OOE+00 8.55E+03 5.44E+05 5.66E+04 144Ce 6.77E÷06 2.12E+06 3.61E+05 0.OOE+00 1.17E+06 1.20E+07 3.89E+05 143Pr 1.85E+04 5.55E+03 9.14E+02 0.OOE+00 3.OOE+03 4.33E+05 9.73E+04 144Pr 5.96E-02 1.85E-02 3.OOE-03 0.OOE+0O 9.77E-03 1.57E+03 1.97E+02 147Nd 1.08E+04 8.73E+03 6.81E+02 O.OOE+0O 4.81E+03 3.28E+05 8.21E+04 154Eu 1.O1E+07 9.21E+05 8.40E+05 0.OOE+00 4.03E+06 6.14E+06 1.1OE+05 181Hf 2.78E+04 1.O1E+05 1.25E+04 0.OOE+00 2.05E+04 1.06E+06 6.62E+04 Page 44 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

Table 6: Child Grass-Cow Milk Pathway Dose Factors (R1)7° (m2mrem/yr) per (.tCi/sec)

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Nuclide Bone Liver Total Body Thyroid Kidney Lung Gl-LLI 3H 0.OOE+00 1.57E+03 1.57E+03 1.57E+03 1.57E+03 1.57E+03 1.57E+03 7Be 7.50E+03 1.28E+04 8.20E+03 0.OOE+00 1.25E+04 0.OOE+00 7.12E+05 51Cr 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.02E+05 5.66E+04 1.55E+04 1.03E+05 5.40E+06 54Mn 0.OOE+00 2.1OE+07 5.59E+06 0.OOE+0O 5.89E+06 0.OOE+00 1.76E+07 55Fe 1.12E+08 5.94E+07 1.84E+07 0.OOE+O0 0.OOE+00 3.36E+07 1.1OE+07 59Fe 1.20E+08 1.95E+08 9.70E+07 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 5.64E+07 2.03E+08 57Co 0.OOE+00 3.84E+06 7.78E+06 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+O0 3.15E+07 58Co 0.OOE+00 1.21E+07 3.72E+07 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+OO 7.08E+07 60Co 0.OOE+00 4.32E+07 1.27E+08 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+OO 0.OOE+00 2.39E+08 63Ni 2.97E+10 1.59E+09 1.O1E+09 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.07E+08 65Zn 4.14E+09 1.OE+10 6.86E+09 O.OOE+00 6.95E+09 0.OOE+00 1.94E+09 86Rb 0.OOE+00 8.78E+09 5.40E+09 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 5.65E+08 895r 6.63E+09 0.OOE+00 1.89E+08 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 2.57E+08 90Sr 1.12E+11 0.OOE+00 2.84E+10 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+0O 1.51E+09 90Y 3.38E+03 0.OOE+00 9.05E+01 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 9.62E+06 91Y 3.91E+04 0.OOE÷0O 1.04E÷03 0.OOE÷00 O.OOE÷00 0.OOE+00 5.20E÷06 95Zr 3.84E+03 8.43E+02 7.51E+02 0.OOE+00 1.21E+03 0.OOE+00 8.80E+05 95Nb 3.72E+05 1.45E+05 1.03E+05 0.OOE+00 1.36E÷05 O.OOE+00 2.6$E+08 103Ru 4.29E÷03 0.OOE+00 1.65E+03 0.OOE+00 1.08E+04 0.OOE+00 1.11E+05

°6Ru 9.25E+04 O.OOE+00 1.15E+04 0.OOE+00 1.25E+05 0.OOE+00 1.44E+06 liomAg 2.09E+08 1.41E+08 1.13E+08 O.OOE+00 2.63E+08 0.OOE+OO 1.68E+1O 109Cd O.OOE+0O 3.86E+06 1.79E+05 0.OOE+00 3.45E+06 0.OOE+00 1.25E+07 ll3 6.11E+08 1.26E+07 3.48E+07 9.29E÷08 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 4.32E+08 245b 1.09E÷08 1.41E+06 3.81E÷07 2.40E+05 0.OOE+00 6.03E+07 6.80E+08 1255b 8.71E+07 6.72E+05 1.23E+07

$.07E+04 0.OOE+00 4.86E+07 2.0$E+08 l27mTe 2.08E+08 5.61E+07 2.47E+07 4.92E+07 5.94E+08 0.OOE+00 1.69E+08 l29mTe 2.72E+08 7.59E+07 4.22E+07 8.76E+07 7.98E÷08 0.OOE+00 3.31E+08 70 ZZ-250, rev. 1 Page45 of $8 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

Table 6: Child Grass-Cow Milk Pathway Dose Factors fR1)

(m2mrem/yr) per (iCi/sec)

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Nuclide Bone Liver Total Body Thyroid Kidney Lung Gl-LLI 3°i 1.73E+06 3.50E+06 1.80E+06 3.85E+08 5.23E+06 0.OOE+00 1.64E+06 1311 1.30E÷09 1.31E+09 7.46E+08 4.34E÷11 2.15E+09 0.OOE+0O 1.17E+08 1321 6.92E-01 1.27E+00 5.85E-O1 5.90E+01 1.95E+00 0.OOE+00 1.50E+00 i

1.72E+07 2.13E+07

$.05E+06 3.95E+09 3.54E+07 0.OOE+OO 8.57E+06 i

0.OOE+0O 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+0O 0.OOE+0O 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 i

5.41E+04 9.74E+04 4.61E+04 8.63E+06 1.49E+05 0.OOE+00 7.42E+04 134Cs 2.27E+10 3.72E+10 7.84E+09 0.OOE÷00 1.15E+1O 4.14E+09 2.OOE+0$

36Cs 1.O1E+09 2.78E+09 1.80E+09 0.OOE+0O 1.48E+09 2.21E+08 9.7$E+07 137Cs 3.23E+10 3.09E+1O 4.56E+09 0.OOE+00 1.O1E÷10 3.62E+09 1.93E+08 40Ba 1.17E+08 1.03E+05 6.84E+06 0.OOE+0O 3.34E+04 6.12E+04 5.94E÷07 40La 1.78E+02 6.23E+01 2.1OE+01 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.74E+06 41Ce 2.19E+04 1.09E+04 1.62E+03 0.OOE+00 4.79E+03 0.OOE+00 1.36E+07 44Ce 1.62E+06 5.09E+05 8.67E+04 O.OOE+00 2.82E+05 0.OOE+OO 1.33E+08 43Pr 7.19E+02 2.16E+02 3.57E+O1 0.OOE+00 1.17E+02 0.OOE+00 7.76E+05 144Pr 5.04E+00 1.56E+OO 2.53E-O1 O.OOE+00 8.24E-O1 0.OOE+OO 3.35E+03 47Nd 4.45E+02 3.61E+02 2.79E+O1 O.OOE÷OO 1.98E+02 O.OOE+00 5.71E+05 154Eu 9.43E+04 8.48E+03 7.75E+03 O.OOE+00 3.73E+04 0.OOE+00 1.97E+06 181Hf 6.44E+02 2.35E+03 2.91E+02 0.OOE+00 4.76E+02 0.OOE+00 8.66E+05 Page 46 of $8 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

Table 7: Child Grass-Goat Milk Pathway Dose Factors (R,)7 APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 (m2mrem/yr) per (iCi/sec)

Nuclide Bone Liver Total Body Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI 3H 0.OOE+OO 3.20E+03 3.20E+03 3.20E+03 3.20E+03 3.20E+03 3.20E+03 7Be 9.OOE+02 1.53E+03 9.84E+02 O.OOE+0O 1.50E+03 O.OOE+OO 8.55E+04 51Cr O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 1.22E+04 6.79E+03 1.85E+03 1.24E+04 6.48E+05 54Mn O.OOE+OO 2.52E+06 6.71E+05 O.OOE+OO 7.06E+05 O.OOE+OO 2.11E+06 55Fe 1.45E+06 7.72E+05 2.39E+05 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 4.36E+05 1.43E+05 59Fe 1.56E+06 2.53E+06 1.26E+06 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 7.34E+05 2.64E+06 57Co O.OOE+OO 4.61E+05 9.33E+05 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 3J8E+06 58Co O.OOE+OO 1.46E+06 4.46E+06 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 8.50E+06 60Co O.OOE+OO 5.19E+06 1.53E+07 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 2.87E+07 63Ni 3.56E+09 1.91E+08 1.21E+08 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 1.28E+07 65Zn 4.97E+O$

1.32E+09 8.23E+08 O.OOE+OO 8.34E+O$

O.OOE+OO 2.32E+08 86Rb 0.OOE+O0 1.05E+09 6.4$E+08 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 6.78E+07 89Sr 1.39E+1O O.OOE+OO 3.97E+08 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+0O 5.39E+08 905r 2.35E+11 O.OOE+OO 5.95E+1O O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 3.16E+09 gay 4.06E÷02 O.OOE÷OO 1.09E÷O1 0.OOE+OO O.OOE÷OO O.OOE÷OO 1.15E÷06 91Y 4.69E÷03 O.OOE+OO 1.25E+02 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 6.25E+05 95Zr 4.60E+02 1.O1E+02 9.O1E+O1 O.OOE+OO 1.45E+02 O.OOE+OO 1.06E+05 95Nb 4.46E+04 1.74E+04 1.24E+04 O.OOE+OO 1.63E+04 O.OOE+OO 3.21E+07

°3Ru 5.14E+02 O.OOE+OO 1.98E+02 O.OOE÷OO 1.29E+03 O.OOE+OO 1.33E+04 106Ru 1.11E+04 O.OOE+OO 1.38E+03 O.OOE+OO 1.50E+04 O.OOE+OO 1.73E+05 10mAg 2.51E+07 1.69E+07 1.35E+07 O.OOE+OO 3.15E÷07 O.OOE+OO 2.O1E+09 1o9cd O.OOE+OO 4.64E+05 2.15E+04 O.OOE+OO 4.14E+05 O.OOE+OO 1.50E+06 113sn 7.33E+07 1.51E+06 4.1SE+06 1.11E+08 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 5.18E+07 124sb 1.30E÷07 1.69E+05 4.57E+06 2.88E+04 O.OOE÷OO 7.24E+06 8.16E+07 1255b 1.05E+07 8.06E+04 2.19E+06 9.68E+03 O.OOE+OO 5.83E+06 2.50E+07 l27mTe 2.50E+07 6.73E+06 2.97E+06 5.98E+06 7.13E÷07 O.OOE+OO 2.02E+07 l29mTe 3.26E+07 9.1OE+06 5.06E+06 LO5E+07 9.57E÷07 O.OOE+OO 3.98E+07 71 ZZ-250, rev. 1 FORMATION USE Page47of88 IN June, 2021 I

Table 7: Child Grass-Goat Milk Pathway Dose Factors (Ri) fm2mrem/yr) per (iCi/sec)

Page 48 of 88 APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 INFORMATION USE June, 2021 Nuclide Bone Liver Total Body Thyroid Kidney Lung Gl-LLI

°i 2.08E+06 4.20E+06 2.16E+06 4.62E+08 6.27E+06 O.OOE+OO 1.96E+06 1311 1.57E÷09 1.57E+09

$.95E+08 5.21E÷11 2.58E÷09 O.OOE+OO 1.40E÷O$

1321 8.30E-O1 1.53E÷OO 7.02E-O1 7.O$E+O1 2.34E+OO O.OOE+OO 1.80E+OO l

2.06E+07 2.55E+07 9.66E+06 4.74E+09 4.25E+07 O.OOE+OO 1.03E+07 34i O.OOE÷OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO l

6.49E+04 1.17E+05 5.53E+04 1.04E+07 1.79E+05 O.OOE+OO 8.90E+04 134Cs 6.80E+1O 1.12E+11 2.35E+1O O.OOE+OO 3.46E+1O 1.24E+1O 6.O1E+08 136Cs 3.04E+09 8.35E+09 5.40E+09 O.OOE+OO 4.45E+09 6.63E+08 2.93E+08 37Cs 9.68E+1O 9.27E+1O 1.37E+1O O.OOE+OO 3.02E+1O 1.09E+1O 5.80E+08 140Ba 1.41E+07 1.23E+04 8.21E+05 O.OOE+OO 4.O1E+03 7.35E+03 7.13E+06 140La 2.14E+O1 7.47E+OO 2.52E+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 2.08E+05 41Ce 2.63E+03 1.31E+03 1.95E+02 O.OOE+OO 5.75E+02 O.OOE+OO 1.63E+06 44Ce 1.95E+05 6.11E+04 1.04E+04 O.OOE+00 3.38E+04 O.OOE+OO 1.59E+07 43Pr 8.63E+O1 2.59E+O1 4.28E+OO O.OOE+OO 1.40E+O1 O.OOE+OO 9.31E+04 44Pr 6.05E-O1 1.87E-O1 3.04E-02 O.OOE+OO 9.89E-02 O.OOE+OO 4.03E+02 47Nd 5.34E+O1 4.33E+O1 3.35E+OO O.OOE+OO 2.37E+O1 O.OOE+OO 6.85E+04 154Eu 1.13E+04 1.02E+03 9.29E+02 O.OOE+OO 4.47E+03 O.OOE+OO 2.37E+05 181Hf 7.73E+O1 2.S1E+02 3.49E+O1 O.OOE+OO 5.72E+O1 O.OOE+OO 1.04E+05

Table 8: Child Grass-Cow-Meat Pathway Dose Factors (R)72 APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 fm2mrem/yr) per (iCi/sec)

Nuclide Bone Liver Total Body Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI 3H O.OOE÷00 2.34E÷02 2.34E+02 2.34E+02 2.34E+02 2.34E+02 2.34E+02 7Be 7.38E+03 1.26E+04 8.07E+03 0.OOE+00 1.23E+04 O.OOE+O0 7.OOE+05 51Cr 0.OOE÷00 0.OOE+00 8.80E+03 4.88E+03 1.33E+03 8.92E+03 4.67E+05 54Mn 0.OOE+00 8.02E+06 2.14E+06 0.OOE+00 2.25E+06 0.OOE+OO 6.73E+06 55Fe 4.58E+08 2.43E+08 7.52E+07 0.OOE+0O 0.OOE÷0O 1.37E+08 4.50E+07 59Fe 3.77E+08 6.1OE+08 3.04E+08 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+OO 1.77E+08 6.35E+08 57Co O.OOE+00 5.92E+06 1.20E+07 0.OOE+OO 0.OOE+0O 0.OOE+O0 4.85E+07 58Co O.OOE+00 1.64E+07 5.03E+07 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+OO 0.OOE+O0 9.59E+07 60Co O.OOE+00 6.94E+07 2.05E+08 O.OOE+O0 O.OOE+0O 0.OOE+O0 3.84E+08 63N1 2.92E+10 1.56E+09 9.92E+08 0.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+O0 1.05E+08 65Zn 3.76E+08 1.OOE÷09 6.23E+O8 0.OOE+OO 6.31E+08 O.OOE+00 1.76E+08 86Rb O.OOE+00 5.77E+08 3.55E+08 0.OOE+0O 0.OOE+0O 0.OOE+O0 3.71E+07 89Sr 4.82E+08 O.OOE+O0 1.32E+07 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 0.OOE+OO 1.87E+07 905r 1.04E+10 O.OOE+00 2.64E+09 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+0O 0.OOE+O0 1.40E+08 90Y 1.93E+05 O.OOE+00 5.16E+03 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 5.49E+08 91Y 1.SOE+06 O.OOE+OO 4.82E+04 0.OOE+OO 0.OOE÷OO 0.OOE+OO 2.40E+08 95Zr 2.67E+06 5.86E+05 5.22E+05 0.OOE+0O 8.39E+05 0.OOE÷00 6.11E+08 95Nb 4.26E+06 1.66E+06 1.18E+06 O.OOE+00 1.56E+06 0.OOE+O0 3.07E+09 103Ru 1.55E+08 O.OOE+00 5.96E+07 O.OOE+0O 3.90E+08 0.OOE+00 4.O1E+09

°6Ru 4.44E+09 O.OOE+00 5.54E+08 0.OOE+00 6.OOE+09 0.OOE+O0 6.91E+1O liomAg 8.40E+06 5.67E+06 4.53E+06 0.OOE+0O 1.06E+07 0.OOE+OO 6.75E+08

°9Cd O.OOE+O0 1.91E+06 8.84E+04 0.OOE+00 1.70E+06 O.OOE+O0 6.18E+06 l13 2.18E+09 4.48E+07 1.24E+08 3.31E+09 0.OOE÷OO 0.OOE+00 1.54E+09 124sb 2.93E÷07 3.80E+05 1.03E+07 6.46E÷04 0.OOE÷0O 1.62E+07 1.83E+08 255b 2.85E+07 2.20E+05 5.97E+06 2.64E+04 0.OOE+0O 1.59E+07 6.81E+07 l27mTe 1.7$E+09 4.78E+08 2.11E+08 4.25E+08 5.07E+09 0.OOE+00 1.44E+09 l29mTe 1.79E+09 5.OOE+08 2.78E+08 5.78E+08 5.26E+09 0.OOE+00 2.19E+09 Page 49 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021 72 ZZ-250, rev. 1

Table 8: Child Grass-Cow-Meat Pathway Dose Factors (Ri)

(m2mrem/yr) per (.tCi/sec)

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Nuclide Bone Liver Total Body Thyroid Kidney Lung Gl-LLI

°l 3.06E-06 6.18E-06 3.18E-06 6.80E-04 9.23E-06 0.OOE+00 2.89E-06 1311 1.66E÷07 1.67E÷07 9.47E+06 5.51E÷09 2.74E+07 0.OOE÷00 1.48E+06 1321 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 i

5.70E-O1 7.05E-O1 2.67E-01 1.31E+02 1.17E+O0 0.OOE+00 2.84E-O1 l

0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+OO O.OOE+00 0.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO 0.OOE+0O i

0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+OO 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 34Cs 9.23E+08 1.51E+09 3.20E+08 0.OOE+00 4.69E+08 1.68E+08

$.17E+06 136Cs 1.62E+07 4.46E+07 2.89E+07 0.OOE+0O 2.38E+07 3.54E+06 1.57E+06 37Cs 1.33E+09 1.28E+09 1.89E+08 0.OOE+00 4.16E+08 1.50E+08 8.OOE+06 40Ba 4.39E+07 3.85E+04 2.56E+06 0.OOE+00 1.25E÷04 2.29E+04 2.22E+07 140La 3.33E+02 1.17E+02 3.93E+01 O.OOE+0O 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 3.25E+06 41Ce 2.22E+04 1.11E+04 1.65E+03 0.OOE+00 4.86E+03 0.OOE+00 1.38E+07 144Ce 2.32E+06 7.27E+05 1.24E+05 0.OOE+O0 4.02E+05 0.OOE+00 1.89E+08 43Pr 3.34E÷04 1.OOE+04 1.66E+03 0.OOE+00 5.43E+03 0.OOE+OO 3.61E+07 44Pr 5.63E+02 1.74E+02 2.83E+O1 0.OOE+OO 9.21E+01 O.OOE÷O0 3.75E+05 147Nd 1.17E+04 9.48E+03 7.34E+02 O.OOE+OO 5.20E+03 0.OOE+0O 1.50E+07 154Eu 1.12E+07 1.O1E+06 9.20E+05 O.OOE+00 4.43E+06 0.OOE+00 2.34E+08 181Hf 4.77E+06 1.74E+07 2.15E+06 0.OOE+00 3.53E+06 O.OOE+00 6.41E÷09 Page 50 of $8 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

Table 9: Child Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors fR1)73 APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 (m2mrem/yr) per (iCi/sec)

Nuclide Bone Liver Total Body Thyroid Kidney Lung Gl-LLI 3H 0.OOE+00 4.O1E+03 4.O1E+03 4.O1E+03 4.O1E+03 4.O1E+03 4.OE+03 7Be 3.38E+05 5.76E+05 3.70E+05 O.OOE+00 5.65E+05 0.OOE+00 3.21E+07 51Cr 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 1.17E+05 6.50E+04 1.78E+04 1.19E+05 6.21E+06 54Mn 0.OOE+O0 6.65E+08 1.77E+08 0.OOE+0O 1.86E+08 0.OOE+O0 5.58E+0$

55Fe 8.O1E+08 4.25E+08 1.32E+08 0.OOE+0O 0.OOE+00 2.40E+08 7.87E÷07 59Fe 3.98E+08 6.43E+08 3.20E+08 O.OOE+0O 0.OOE+00 1.87E+08 6.70E+08 57Co 0.OOE+00 2.99E+07 6.04E+07 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 2.45E+08 58Co 0.OOE+00 6.44E+07 1.97E+08 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+0O 0.OOE+00 3.76E+08 60Co O.OOE+00 3.78E+08 1.12E+09 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+0O 0.OOE+00 2.1OE+09 63Ni 3.95E+1O 2.11E+09 1.34E+09 0.OOE+OO O.OOE+0O 0.OOE+OO 1.42E+08 65Zn 8.13E+08 2.17E÷09 1.35E+09 0.OOE+0O 1.36E+09 0.OOE+OO 3.80E+08 86Rb O.OOE+00 4.52E+08 2.78E+08 0.OOE+O0 0.OOE+O0 0.OOE+O0 2.91E÷07 895r 3.60E+10 0.OOE+OO 1.03E+09 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.39E+09 905r 1.24E+12 0.OOE+00 3.15E+11 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.67E+10 90Y 3.O1E+06 0.OOE+00 8.04E+04 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 8.56E+09 91Y 1.86E÷07 0.OOE÷00 4.99E+05 0.OOE+00 0.OOE÷00 0.OOE+00 2.48E÷09 95Zr 3.86E+06 8.48E+05 7.55E+05 0.OOE+00 1.21E+06 0.OOE÷00 8.85E+08 95Nb 7.4$E+05 2.91E+05 2.08E+05 0.OOE+OO 2.74E+05 0.OOE+00 5.39E+08 103Ru 1.53E+07 0.OOE+00 5.90E+06 0.OOE+00 3.$6E+07 0.OOE+00 3.97E+08

°6Ru 7.45E+02 0.OOE+00 9.30E+07 0.OOE+0O LOE+09 0.OOE+00 1.16E+10 ilomAg 3.21E+07 2.17E+07

1.73E+07 0.OOE+0O 4.04E+07 0.OOE+0O 2.58E+09 109cd O.OOE+00 2.45E+08 1.14E+07 0.OOE+O0 2.18E+08 O.OOE+00 7.94E+08 l13 1.58E+09 3.25E+07 9.OOE+07 2.40E+09 O.OOE+0O 0.OOE+0O 1.12E+09 245b 3.52E÷08 4.57E÷06 1.23E+08 7.77E+05 0.OOE÷00 1.95E+08 2.20E+09 1255b 4.99E+08 3.85E+06 1.05E+08 4.63E+05 0.OOE+00 2.78E+08 1.19E+09 l27mTe 1.32E+09 3.56E+08 1.57E+08 3.16E+08 3.77E+09 0.OOE+00 1.07E+09 l29mTe 8.41E+08 2.35E+08 1.31E+08 2.71E+08 2.47E÷09 0.OOE+00 1.03E+09 Page 51 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021 73 ZZ-250, rev. 1

Table 9: Child Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors (Ri)

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 fm2mrem/yr) per (.tCi/sec)

Nuclide Bone Liver Total Body Thyroid Kidney Lung Gl-LLl

°l 6.16E+05 L24E+06 6.41E+05 1.37E+08 1.86E+06 0.OOE+00 5.82E÷05 1311 1.43E+08 1.44E÷08 8.17E+07 4.76E+10 2.36E+08 O.OOE+O0 1.28E+07 1321 9.23E+01 1.70E+02 7.80E+01 7.87E+03 2.60E+02 O.OOE+O0 2.OOE+02 i

3.53E+06 4.37E+06 1.65E+06 8.12E+08 7.28E+06 O.OOE+00 1.76E+06 l

1.56E-04 2.89E-04 1.33E-04 6.65E-03 4.42E-04 O.OOE+0O L92E-04 l

6.26E+04 1.13E+05 5.33E+04 9.98E+06 1.73E+05 O.OOE+OO 8.59E+04 134Cs 1.60E+10 2.63E+10 5.55E+09 0.OOE+0O 8.15E+09 2.93E+09 1.42E+08 136Cs 8.24E+07 2.27E+08 1.47E+08 0.OOE+O0 1.21E+0$

1.80E+07 7.96E+06 37Cs 2.39E+10 2.29E+10 3.38E+09 0.OOE+00 7.46E+09 2.68E+09 1.43E+08 40Ba 2.77E+08 2.43E+05 1.62E+07 0.OOE+00 7.90E+04 1.45E÷05 1.40E+08 140La 3.36E+04 1.18E+04 3.96E+03 O.OOE+0O 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+OO 3.28E÷08 141Ce 6.56E÷05 3.27E+05 4.86E+04 0.OOE+OO 1.43E+05 0.OOE+00 4.0$E+08 144Ce 1.27E+08 3.98E+07 6.7$E+06 0.OOE+0O 2.21E+07 0.OOE+00 1.04E+10 43Pr 1.46E+05 4.37E+04 7.23E+03 O.OOE+00 2.37E+04 O.OOE+OO 1.57E÷08 Pr 7.88E+03 2.44E+03 3.97E+02 O.OOE+00 1.29E+03 O.OOE+O0 5.25E+06 147Nd 7.15E+04 5.79E+04 4.48E+03 0.OOE+OO 3.18E+04 0.OOE+OO 9.17E+07 154Eu 1.66E+08 1.50E+07 1.37E+07 O.OOE+00 6.57E+07 O.OOE+00 3.48E+09 81Hf 4.90E+05 L79E+06 2.21E+05 O.OOE+00 3.63E+05 0.OOE+00 6.59E+08 Page 52 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Table 10: Highest Annual Average Atmospheric Dispersion Parameters x/Q Undecayed!

Q X/Q Decayed/

Location Meteorological Distance undepleted Decayed!

Depleted D/Q Sector (meters) 3 Undepleted 3

fm2) fsec!m )

(sec/rn (sec/rn)

Site Boundary74 55W 1400 1.8E-6 1.7E-6 1.6E-6 4.5E-9 Nearest Residence7576 NNW 2900 1.1E-6 1.OE-6 9.OE-7 3.OE-9 Farming Areas within the N/A N/A 1.6E-6 1.6E-6 1.4E-6 5.3E-9 Site Boundary7778 74 Dispersion parameters from HPCI 1503 75 Dispersion parameters from HPCI 1504 76 All ingestion dose pathways are assumed to exist at the location of the nearest resident 77 Dispersion parameters from HPCI 1502 78 These values were derived for a narrow scope application. Extreme caution should be exercised when determining their suitability for use in other applications Page53of88 INFORMATION USE June,2021

79 Regulatory Guide 1.109, Appendix C, Section 3.a 16.11.2.1 16.11.2.3 16.11.2.3 16.11.2.3 APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Controlling Location Site Boundary Nearest Resident Site Boundary Nearest Resident Nearest Resident Page 54 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021 Table 11: Application of Atmospheric Dispersion Parameters for Release Permits Dispersion Parameter Controlling Age Group REC Dose Pathway Noble Gas, Beta Air & Gamma Air Noble Gas, Total Body & Skin Inhalation X/Q, decayed/undepleted (2.26 day half-life)

X/Q decayed/undepleted (2.26 day half-life)

X/Q, decayed/depleted (8 day half-life)

N/A 16.11.2.2 N/A 16.11.2.1 Site Boundary Ground Plane Deposition D/Q Ingestion pathways D/Q*

For 3H, X/Q decayed/depleted is used instead of D/Q.79 Child N/A Child

Table 12: Application of Atmospheric Dispersion Parameters Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 80 Historical, i.e., 10 year average, dispersion parameters for activities inside the Site Boundary are provided in Table 10.

81 Regulatory Guide 1.109, Appendix C, Section 3.a 82 See Appendix A Page 55 of $8 INFORMATION USE June, 2021 Controlling Dose Pathway Dispersion Parameter Dispersion Values2° Controlling Location Age Group Noble Gas, X/Q, decayed/undepleted Site Boundary N/A Concurrent Beta Air & Gamma Air Dose (2.26 day half-life)

Nearest Resident Site Boundary Noble Gas X/Q decayed/undepleted Concurrent N/A Nearest Resident Total Body & Skin Dose (2.26 day half-life)

Historical Inside Site Boundary Site Boundary Concurrent Ground Plane Deposition Dose D/Q N/A Nearest Resident Historical Inside Site Boundary Site Boundary Child Concurrent X/Q, decayed/depleted Nearest Resident Inhalation Dose (8 day half-life)

Concurrent Nearest Residence Adult Historical Inside Site Boundary D/Q Site Boundary Ingestion Dose Pathways (For H3, X/Q, decayed/depleted Child Concurrent Nearest Resident Is used instead of D/Q.)8 Child Historical Nearest Resident 14C All Dose Pathways82 X/Q, undecayed/undepleted Adult Historical Inside Site Boundary

Tzoz aunf 3Sfl NOLLWJNOJNI s8Jo 9s aea UO!eUaWflJSU! e3!OIO]00aW U!eJ OAe] SaeD!PU!,, (q) uo!euawnJsu! IeD!OIOJ0OOW UIJ eqd sae3!pu!,V, ()

WI V WOl V WO[-09 V WOI V WOI V WOI V WOl UO!e!d!DaJd A!p!WnH aA!:eIaN/:u!od MO aDuaJaJJia dwai ApqeIJe PU!M aJfleJadWa1 !V UOIP8JftJ pu!M paad PU!M g W09 WOI-09 VWO9 WOI WOl VWO9 VWO9 gWOI aieuiajv AJew!Jd iaaweiej puoeg ALpJeJe UO!aIGS eea 1e!2OIOJOa1aLAJ :i aqe W09 Wog W09 aieuiaiv PJPII 9o A9d

£00 [O-ZZ-VdV

Table 14: Adult Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors (R1)83 (mrem/yr) per (iCi/m3)

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Nuclide Bone Liver Total Body Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI 3H ND 1.26E+03 L26E+03 1.26E+03 1.26E+03 1.26E+03 L26E+03 7Be 4.27E+02 9.68E+02 4.70E+02 ND ND 4.21E+04 5.35E+03 51Cr ND ND 1.OOE+02 5.95E+O1 2.28E+O1 1.44E+04 3.32E+03 54Mn ND 3.96E+04 6.30E+03 ND 9.84E+03 1.40E+06 7.74E+04 55Fe 2.46E+04 1.70E+04 3.94E+03 ND ND 7.21E+04 6.03E+03 59Fe 1.18E+04 2.78E+04 1.06E+04 ND ND 1.02E+06 1.88E+05 57Co ND 6.92E÷02 6.71E÷02 ND ND 3.70E÷05 3.14E+04 58Co ND 1.58E+03 2.07E+03 ND ND 9.28E+05 1.06E+05 60Co ND 1.15E+04 1.48E+04 ND ND 5.97E+06 2.85E+05 63N1 4.32E+05 3.14E+04 1.45E+04 ND ND 1.78E+05 1.34E+04 65Zn 3.24E+04 1.03E+05 4.66E+04 ND 6.90E+04 8.64E+05 5.34E+04 86Rb ND 1.35E+05 5.90E+04 ND ND ND 1.66E+04 89Sr 3.04E+05 ND 8.72E+03 ND ND 1.40E+06 3.50E+05 90Sr 9.92E+07 ND 6.1OE+06 ND ND 9.60E+06 7.22E+05 90Y 2.09E÷03 ND 5.61E+O1 ND ND 1.70E÷05 5.06E+05 91Y 4.62E÷05 ND 1.24E+04 ND ND 1.70E+06 3.85E÷05 95Zr 1.07E+05 3.44E+04 2.33E+04 ND 5.42E+04 1.77E+06 1.50E+05 95Nb 1.41E+04 7.82E+03 4.21E+03 ND 7.74E+03 5.05E+05 1.04E+05 103Ru 1.53E+03 ND 6.58E+02 ND 5.83E+03 5.05E÷05 1.1OE+05

°6Ru 6.91E+04 ND 8.72E+03 ND 1.34E+05 9.36E+06 9.12E+05 liomAg 1.O8E+04 1.OOE+04 5.94E+03 ND 1.97E+04 4.63E+06 3.02E+05 109Cd ND 3.67E+05 1.31E+04 ND 3.57E+05 6.83E+05 5.82E÷04 113sn 5.72E÷04 2.18E+03 4.39E+03 1.24E÷03 ND 9.44E÷05 1.18E+05 245b 3.12E÷04 5.89E+02 1.24E÷04 7.55E+O1 ND 2.48E÷06 4.06E+05 255b 5.34E+04 5.95E+02 1.26E+04 5.40E÷O1 ND 1.74E+06 1.O1E+05 l27mTe 1.26E+04 5.77E+03 1.57E+03 3.29E+03 4.58E+04 9.60E+05 1.50E+05 l29mTe 9.76E+03 4.67E+03 1.58E÷03 3.44E+03 3.66E+04 1.16E+06 3.83E+05 Page 57 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021 83 ZZ-78, rev. 2

Table 14: Adult Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors fRi)

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 (mrem/yr) per (.tCi/m3)

Nuclide Bone Liver Total Body Thyroid Kidney Lung Gl-LLI 1301 4.58E+03 1.34E+04 5.28E+03 1.14E+06 2.09E+04 ND 7.69E÷03 1311 2.52E÷04 3.58E÷04 2.05E÷04 1.19E+07 6.13E+04 ND 6.28E÷03 1321 1.16E+03 3.26E+03 1.16E+03 1.14E+05 5.18E+03 ND 4.06E+02 i

864E+03 1.48E+04 4.52E+03 2.15E+06 2.58E+04 ND 8.88E+03 1341 6.44E+02 1.73E+03 6.15E+02 2.98E+04 2.75E+03 ND 1.O1E+OO 1351 2.68E+03 6.98E+03 2.57E+03 4.48E+05 1.11E+04 ND 5.25E+03 34Cs 3.73E+05 8.48E+05 7.28E+05 ND 2.87E+05 9.76E+04 1.04E+04 36Cs 3.90E+04 1.46E+05 1.1OE+05 ND 8.56E+04 1.20E÷04 1.17E+04 37Cs 4.78E+05 6.21E+05 4.28E+05 ND 2.22E+05 7.52E+04 8.40E+03 140Ba 3.90E+04 4.90E+01 2.57E+03 ND 1.67E+01 1.27E+06 2.18E+05 40La 3.44E+02 1.74E+02 4.58E+01 ND ND 1.36E+05 4.58E+05 141Ce 1.99E+04 1.35E+04 1.53E+03 ND 6.26E÷03 3.62E+05 1.20E+05 44Ce 3.43E+06 1.43E+06 1.84E+05 ND 8.48E+05 7.78E+06

$.16E+05 43Pr 9.36E+03 3.75E+03 4.64E+02 ND 2.16E+03 2.81E+05 2.OOE+05 144Pr 3.O1E-02 1.25E-02 1.53E-03 ND 7.05E-03 1.02E+03 2.15E-08 47Nd 5.27E+03 6.1OE+03 3.65E+02 ND 3.56E+03 2.21E+05 1.73E+05 154Eu 5.92E+06 7.28E+05 5.18E+05 ND 3.49E+06 4.67E+06 2.72E+05 81Hf 1.41E+04 6.82E+04 6.32E+03 ND 1.48E+04 6.85E+05 1.39E+05 Page 58 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

Table 15: Adult Grass-Cow Milk Pathway Dose Factors (R1)

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 (m2mrem/yr) per (iCi/sec)

Nuclide Bone Liver

° Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI 3H ND 7.63E+02 7.63E÷02 7.63E+02 7.63E+02 7.63E+02 7.63E+02 7Be 1.63E+03 3.72E+03 1.8E+03 ND 3.93E+03 ND 6.45E÷05 51Cr ND ND 2.86E+04 1.71E+04 6.30E+03 3.79E+04 7.19E+06 54Mn ND 8.42E+06 1.61E+06 ND 2.50E+06 ND 2.58E+07 55Fe 2.51E+07 1.74E+07 4.05E+06 ND ND 9.68E+06 9.96E+06 59Fe 2.97E+07 6.98E+07 2.68E+07 ND ND 1.95E+07 2.33E+08 57Co ND 1.28E+06 2.13E+06 ND ND ND 3.25E+07 58Co ND 4.72E+06 1.06E+07 ND ND ND 9.56E+07 60Co ND 1.64E+07 3.62E+07 ND ND ND 3.08E+08 63Ni 6.73E+09 4.67E+08 2.26E+08 ND ND ND 9.73E÷07 65Zn 1.37E+09 4.37E+09 1.97E+09 ND 2.92E+09 ND 2.75E+09 86Rb ND 2.60E+09 1.21E+09 ND ND ND 5.12E+08 89 1.45E+09 ND 4.17E+07 ND ND ND 2.33E+08 905r 4.68E+10 ND 1.15E+10 ND ND ND 1.35E+09 gay 7.43E+02 ND 1.99E+01 ND ND ND 7.87E+06 91y 8.59E+03 ND 2.30E+02 ND ND ND 4.73E+06 95Zr 9.44E+02 3.03E+02 2.05E+02 ND 4.75E+02 ND 9.59E+05 95Nb 9.65E+04 5.37E+04 2.89E+04 ND 5.31E+04 ND 3.26E+08

°3Ru 1.02E+03 ND 4.39E+02 ND 3.89E+03 ND 1.19E+05

°6Ru 2.04E+04 ND 2.58E+03 ND 3.94E+04 ND 1.32E+06 liomAg 5.82E+07 5.39E+07 3.20E+07 ND 1.06E+08 ND 2.20E+10 109cd ND 1.13E+06 3.95E+04 ND 1.08E+06 ND 1.14E+07 113Sn 1.34E+08 3.81E+06 7.73E+06 2.18E+06 ND ND 4.02E+08 245b 2.57E+07 4.86E+05 1.02E+07 6.24E+04 ND 2.OOE+07 7.31E+08 255b 2.04E+07 2.28E+05 4.87E+06 2.08E+04 ND 1.58E+07 2.25E+08 l27mTe 4.58E+07 1.64E+07 5.58E+06 1.17E+07 1.86E+08 ND 1.54E÷08

29mTe 6.02E+07 2.25E+07 9.53E+06 2.07E+07 2.51E+08 ND 3.03E+08 Page 59 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021 84 ZZ-78, rev. 2

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Table 15: Adult Grass-Cow Milk Pathway Dose Factors (R1) fm2mrem/yr) per (iCi/sec)

Nuclide Bone Liver Total Body Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-ILI

°i 4.21E+05 1.24E+06 4.91E+05 1.05E÷08 1.94E+06 ND 1.07E+06 1311 2.97E+08 4.25E+08 2.43E+08 1.39E+11 7.28E+08 ND 1.12E+08 1321 1.65E-O1 4.42E-01 1.55E-01 1.55E+01 7.04E-01 ND 8.30E-02 l

3.88E+06 6.75E+06 2.06E+06 9.92E+08 1.18E+07 ND 6.07E+06 1341 0.OOE÷00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+O0 ND 0.OOE+00

135, 1.29E+04 3.37E+04 1.25E+04 2.23E+06 5.41E÷04 ND 3.81E+04 134Cs 5.65E+09 1.35E+10 1.1OE+10 ND 4.35E+09 1.45E+09 2.35E+08 36Cs 2.63E+O$

1.04E+09 7.48E+08 ND 5.79E+08 7.93E+07 1.18E+08 137Cs 7.38E+09 1.O1E+10 6.61E+09 ND 3.43E+09 1.14E+09 1.95E+08 40Ba 2.69E+07 3.38E+04 1.76E+06 ND 1.15E+04 1.93E+04 5.54E+07 140La 4.14E+O1 2.09E+01 5.51E+O0 ND ND ND 1.53E÷06 141Ce 4.85E+03 3.28E+03 3.72E+02 ND 1.52E+03 ND 1.25E+07 144Ce 3.58E+05 1.50E÷05 1.92E+04 ND 8.87E÷04 ND 1.21E+08 143Pr 1.58E+02 6.34E+01 7.83E+00 ND 3.66E+01 ND 6.92E+05 44Pr 1.1OE+00 4.58E-01 5.61E-02 ND 2.58E-O1 ND 1.59E-07 147Nd 9.42E+01 1.09E+02 6.51E+00 ND 6.36E÷01 ND 5.23E+05 54Eu 2.37E+04 2.91E+03 2.07E+03 ND 1.39E+04 ND 2.11E+06 181Hf 1.42E+02 6.92E+02 6.41E+ 1 ND 1.49E÷02 ND 7.87E+05 Page 60 of 2$

INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Table 16: Adult Grass-Goat Milk Pathway Dose Factors (R;)85 (m2mrem/yr) per fiCi/sec)

Nuclide Bone Liver Total Body Thyroid Kidney Lung Gl-LLI 3H ND 1.56E+03 1.56E+03 1.56E+03 1.56E+03 1.56E+03 1.56E+03 7Be 1.96E+02 4.47E+02 2.17E+02 ND 4.72E+02 ND 7.74E+04 51Cr ND ND 3.43E+03 2.05E+03 7.56E+02 4.56E+03 8.63E+05 54Mn ND 1.O1E+06 1.93E+05 ND 3.O1E+05 ND 3.1OE+06 55Fe 3.27E+05 2.26E+05 5.26E+04 ND ND 1.26E+05 1.30E+05 59Fe 3.87E+05 9.08E+05 3.48E+05 ND ND 2.54E+05 3.03E+06 57Co ND 1.54E+05 2.56E+05 ND ND ND 3.90E+06 58Co ND 5.66E+05 1.27E+06 ND ND ND 1.15E+07 60Co ND 1.97E+06 4.35E+06 ND ND ND 3.70E+07 63Ni 8.08E+08 5.60E+07 2.71E+07 ND ND ND L17E+07 65Zn 1.65E+08 5.24E+08 2.37E+08 ND 3.51E+08 ND 3.30E+08 86Rb ND 3.12E+08 1.45E+08 ND ND ND 6.15E+07 89Sr 3.05E+09 ND 8.75E+07 ND ND ND 4.89E+08 905r 9.84E+1O ND 2.41E+1O ND ND ND 2.84E+09 90Y 8.92E+01 ND 2.39E+0O ND ND ND 9.46E+05 9Y 1.03E÷03 ND 2.76E+O1 ND ND ND 5.68E÷05 95Zr 1.13E+02 3.63E+01 2.46E+01 ND 5.70E+01 ND 1.15E+05 95Nb 1.16E+04 6.45E+03 3.47E+03 ND 6.37E+03 ND 3.91E+07

°3Ru 1.22E÷02 ND 5.27E+01 ND 4.67E+02 ND 1.43E+04 106Ru 2.45E+03 ND 3.1OE+02 ND 4.73E+03 ND 1.59E+05 liomAg 6.99E+06 6.47E+06 3.84E+06 ND 1.27E+07 ND 2.64E+09

°9Cd ND 1.36E+05 4.74E+03 ND 1.30E+05 ND 1.37E+06 13sn 1.61E+07 4.58E+05 9.28E+05 2.62E+05 ND ND 4.83E+07 24Sb 3.09E÷06 5.24E÷04 1.23E÷06 7.50E÷03 ND 2.41E+06 8.78E+07 1255b 2.46E+06 2.74E+04 5.84E÷05 2.50E+03 ND 1.89E+06 2.70E+07 l27mTe 5.50E+06 1.97E÷06 6.70E+05 1.41E+06 2.23E+07 ND 1.84E+07 l29mTe 7.23E+06 2.70E+06 1.14E+06 2.4$E+06 3.02E+07 ND 3.64E+07 Page 61 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021 85 ZZ-78, rev. 2

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Table 16: Adult Grass-Goat Milk Pathway Dose Factors fRi)

(m2mrem/yr) per (iCi/sec)

Nuclide Bone Liver Total Body Thyroid Kidney Lung Gl-LLI

°i 5.05E+05 1.49E+06 5.88E+05 1.26E+08 2.32E+06 ND 1.28E+06 1311 3.56E+08 5.09E+08 2.92E+08 1.67E+11

$.72E÷08 ND 1.34E+08 1321 1.98E-01 5.29E-01 1.85E-01 1.85E+01 8.43E-01 ND 9.95E-02 l

4.65E+06

$.09E+06 2.47E+06 1.19E+09 1.41E+07 ND 7.27E+06 34i 0.OOE÷O0 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 ND 0.OOE+0O 35i 1.54E+04 4.04E+04 1.49E+04 2.67E+06 6.48E+04 ND 4.57E+04 134Cs 1.70E÷10 4.04E+1O 3.30E+1O ND 1.31E+10 4.34E+09 7.07E+08 l36 7.91E÷08 3.12E+09 2.25E+09 ND 1.74E+09 2.38E+08 3.55E+08 137Cs 2.22E+10 3.03E+1O 1.99E+10 ND 1.03E÷1O 3.42E+09 5.87E+08 40Ba 3.23E+06 4.06E÷03 2.12E+05 ND 1.38E÷03 2.32E+03 6.65E+06 40La 4.97E+00 2.51E+00 6.62E-01 ND ND ND 1.84E+05 141Ce 5.82E+02 3.94E+02 4.46E+01 ND 1.83E+02 ND 1.50E+06 44Ce 4.30E+04 1.80E+04 2.31E+03 ND 1.07E+04 ND 1.45E+07 43Pr 1.90E+01 7.61E+00 9.40E-01 ND 4.39E+00 ND 8.31E+04 44Pr 1.33E-01 5.50E-02 6.74E-03 ND 3.1OE-02 ND 1.91E-08 147Nd 1.13E+01 1.31E+01 7.82E-01 ND 7.64E+00 ND 6.2$E+04 154Eu 2.84E+03 3.49E+02 2.49E+02 ND 1.67E+03 ND 2.53E+05 81H1 1.71E+01 8.31E+01 7.70E+00 ND 1.79E+01 ND 9.46E+04 Page 62 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Table 17: Adult Grass-Cow-Meat Pathway Dose Factors (R1)86 (m2mrem/yr) per (iCi/sec)

Nuclide Bone Liver Total Body Thyroid Kidney Lung Gl-LLI 3H ND 3.25E+02 3.25E÷02 3.25E+02 3.25E+02 3.25E+02 3.25E+02 7Be 4.57E+03 1.04E+04 5.07E+03 ND 1.1OE+04 ND 1.81E+06 51Cr ND ND 7.04E+03 4.21E+03 1.55E+03 9.34E+03 1.77E+06 54Mn ND 9.17E+06 1.75E+06 ND 2.73E+06 ND 2.81E+07 55Fe 2.93E+08 2.02E+08 4.72E+07 ND ND 1.13E+08 1.16E+08 59Fe 2.65E+08 6.24E+08 2.39E+08 ND ND 1.74E+08 2.O8E+09 57Co ND 5.63E+06 9.36E+06 ND ND ND 1.43E+08 58Co ND 1.82E+07 4.08E+07 ND ND ND 3.69E+08 60Co ND 7.51E+07 1.66E+08 ND ND ND 1.41E+09 63N1 1.89E+10 1.31E+09 6.33E+08 ND ND ND 2.73E+08 65Zn 3.56E+08 1.13E+09 5.11E+08 ND 7.57E+08 ND 7.13E+08 86Rb ND 4.87E+08 2.27E+08 ND ND ND 9.60E+07 895r 3.O1E+08 ND 8.65E+06 ND ND ND 4.83E+07 905r 1.24E+10 ND 3.05E+09 ND ND ND 3.59E+08 90Y L21E+05 ND 3.24E+03 ND ND ND 1.28E+09 91Y 1.13E÷06 ND 3.02E+04 ND ND ND 6.23E+08 95Zr 1.87E+06 6.OOE+05 4.06E+05 ND 9.42E+05 ND 1.90E+09 95Nb 3.15E+06 1.75E+06 9.43E+05 ND 1.73E+06 ND 1.06E+10

°3Ru 1.05E+08 ND 4.53E+07 ND 4.O1E+08 ND 1.23E+10 106Ru 2.80E+09 ND 3.54E+08 ND 5.40E+09 ND 1.81E+11 liomAg 6.68E÷06 6.18E+06 3.67E+06 ND 1.21E+07 ND 2.52E+09

°9Cd ND L59E+06 5.55E+04 ND 1.52E+06 ND 1.60E+07 ll35 L37E+09 3.88E+07 7.86E+07 2.22E+07 ND ND 4.09E+09 1245b 1.98E+07 3.74E+05 7.84E÷06 4.79E+04 ND 1.54E+07 5.61E+08 255b 1.91E+07 2.13E+05 4.54E+06 1.94E÷04 ND 1.47E+07 2.1OE+08 l27mTe 1.11E+09 3.98E+08 1.36E+08 2.85E+08 4.53E+09 ND 3.74E÷09 l29mTe 1.13E+09 4.23E+08 1.79E+08 3.89E+08 4.73E+09 ND 5.71E+09 Page 63 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021 86 ZZ-78, rev. 2

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Table 17: Adult Grass-Cow-Meat Pathway Dose Factors fR1)

(m2mrem/yr) per (.tCi/sec)

Nuclide Bone Liver Total Body Thyroid Kidney Lung Gl-LLI 3°i 2.12E-06 6.27E-06 2.47E-06 5.31E-04 9.78E-06 ND 5.40E-06 1311 1.08E+07 1.54E+07 8.82E+06 5.04E+09 2.64E+07 ND 4.06E+06 1321 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+0O 0.OOE+00 ND 0.OOE+00 l

3.67E-01 6.39E-01 1.95E-O1 9.38E+01 1.11E+00 ND 5.74E-O1 l

0.OOE÷00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 ND 0.OOE+00 i

0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 ND 0.OOE+00 134Cs 6.57E+08 1.56E+09 1.2$E+09 ND 5.06E+08 1.68E+08 2.74E+07 36Cs 1.20E+07 4.76E+07 3.42E+07 ND 2.65E+07 3.63E+06 5.40E+06 137Cs 8.71E+08 1.19E+09 7.81E+08 ND 4.04E+08 1.34E+08 2.31E+07 140Ba 2.87E+07 3.61E+04 1.88E+06 ND 1.23E÷04 2.07E+04 5.91E+07 40La 2.21E+02 1.11E+02 2.94E+01 ND ND ND 8.1$E+06 41Ce 1.40E+04 9.49E+03 1.08E+03 ND 441E+03 ND 3.63E+07 44Ce 1.46E+06 6.09E+05 7.82E+04 ND 3.61E+05 ND 4.92E+08 43Pr 2.1OE+04 8.40E+03 1.04E+03 ND 4.85E+03 ND 9.18E÷07 144Pr 3.52E+02 1.46E+02 1.79E+01 ND 8.24E+01 ND 5.06E-05 147Nd 7.07E+03 8.17E+03 4.89E+02 ND 4.77E+03 ND 3.92E+07 154Eu 8.02E+06 9.86E+05 7.OE+05 ND 4.72E+06 ND 7.14E+08 181Hf 3.O1E÷06 1.46E+07 1.35E+06 ND 3.14E+06 ND 1.66E+10 Page 64 of $8 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Table 18: Adult Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors (R;)87 (m2mrem/yr) per (iCi/sec)

Nuclide Bone Liver Total Body Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI 3H ND 2.26E+03 2.26E+03 2.26E+03 2.26E+03 2.26E+03 2.26E+03 7Be 9.24E+04 2.11E+05 1.03E+05 ND 2.23E+05 ND 3.66E+07 51Cr ND ND 4.64E+04 2.78E+04 1.02E+04 6.16E+04 1.17E+07 54Mn ND 3.13E÷08 5.97E+07 ND 9.31E+07 ND 9.59E+08 55Fe 2.1OE+08 1.45E+08 3.38E+07 ND ND 8.08E+07 8.31E+07 59Fe 1.26E+08 2.96E+08 1.14E+08 ND ND 8.28E+07 9.88E+08 57Co ND 1.17E+07 1.95E+07 ND ND ND 2.97E+08 58Co ND 3.07E+07 6.89E+07 ND ND ND 6.23E+08 60Co ND 1.67E+08 3.69E+08 ND ND ND 3.14E+09 63N1 1.04E+10 7.21E+08 3.49E+08 ND ND ND 1.50E+08 65Zn 3.17E+08 1.O1E+09 4.56E+08 ND 6.75E+08 ND 6.36E+08 86Rb ND 2.19E+08 1.02E+08 ND ND ND 4.33E+07 89Sr 9.97E+09 ND 2.86E+08 ND ND ND 1.60E+09 905r 6.05E+11 ND 1.48E+11 ND ND ND 1.75E+10 90Y 7.67E+05 ND 2.06E+04 ND ND ND 8.14E+09 91Y 5.11E+06 ND 1.37E+05 ND ND ND 2.81E+09 95Zr 1.17E÷06 3.77E+05 2.55E+05 ND 5.91E+05 ND 1.19E+09 95Nb 2.40E+05 1.34E+05 7.19E+04 ND 1.32E+05 ND 8.1E+08 103Ru 4.77E+06 ND 2.06E+06 ND 1.82E+07 ND 5.57E+0$

°6Ru 1.93E+O8 ND 2.44E+07 ND 3.72E+08 ND 1.25E+1O 10mAg 1.05E+07 9.75E+06 5.79E+06 ND 1.92E+07 ND 3.98E+09 109Cd 0.OOE+00 8.36E+07 2.92E+06 ND 8.OOE+07 ND 8.43E+08 113Sn 4.16E+08 1.18E+07 2.40E+07 6.75E+06 ND ND 1.25E+09 1245b tO4E÷08 1.96E+06 4.11E+07 2.51E+05 ND 8.07E+07 2.94E+09 125sb 1.37E÷0$

1.53E+06 3.25E+07 1.39E+05 ND 1.05E+08 1.50E+09 l27mTe 3.49E+08 1.25E+08 4.26E+07 8.92E+07 1.42E+09 ND 1.17E+09 l29mTe 2.51E+08 9.38E÷07 3.92E+07 8.64E+07 1.05E+09 ND 1.27E+09 Page 65 of 8$

INFORMATION USE June, 2021 87 ZZ-78, rev. 2

Table 18: Adutt Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors fR1)

(m2mrem/yr) per (iCi/sec)

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Nuclide Bone Liver Total Body Thyroid Kidney Lung Gl-LLI

°l 3.93E+05 1.16E+06 4.57E+05 9.81E+07 1.81E+06 ND 9.97E+05 1311 8.08E+07 1.16E+08 6.62E+07 3.79E+10 1.9$E+08 ND 3.05E÷07 1321 5.77E+01 1.54E+02 5.40E+01 5.40E+03 2.46E+02 ND 2.90E+01 i

2.09E+O6 3.63E+06 1.11E+06 5.33E+08 6.33E+06 ND 3.26E+06 i

9.69E-05 2.63E-04 9.42E-05 4.56E-03 4.19E-04 ND 2.30E-07 l

3.90E+04 1.02E+05 3.77E+04 6.74E+06 1.64E+05 ND 1.15E+05 134Cs 4.67E+09 1.11E+10 9.08E+09 ND 3.59E+09 1.19E+09 1.94E+08 136Cs 4.27E+07 1.69E+08 1.21E+08 ND 9.38E+07 1.29E+07 1.91E+07 137Cs 6.36E+09 8.70E+09 5.70E+09 ND 2.95E+09 9.81E+08 1.68E+08 40Ba 1.29E+08 1.61E+05 8.42E+06 ND 5.49E+04 9.24E+04 2.65E+08 140La 1.58E+04 7.98E+03 2.11E+03 ND ND ND 5.86E+08 41Ce 1.97E+05 1.33E+05 1.51E+04 ND 6.19E+04 ND 5.1OE+08 44Ce 3.29E+07 1.38E+07 1.77E+06 ND 8.16E+06 ND 1.11E+10 43Pr 6.26E+04 2.51E+04 3.1OE+03 ND 1.45E+04 ND 2.74E+08 44Pr 2.03E+03 8.43E+02 1.03E+02 ND 4.75E+02 ND 2.92E-04 147Nd 3.33E+04 3.85E+04 2.31E+03 ND 2.25E+04 ND 1.85E+08 154Eu 4.85E÷07 5.97E+06 4.25E+06 ND 2.86E+07 ND 4.32E+09 81Hf 1.40E+05 6.82E+05 6.32E+04 ND 1.47E+05 ND 7.76E+08 Page 66 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Appendix A: Methodology for Calculating Dose from 14C in Gaseous Effluents 1)

Introduction The purpose of this Appendix is to provide methodology and parameters for calculating (1) the quantity of 4C released in gaseous effluents, (2) the dose to the Member of the Public at the nearest receptor location due to 4C released in gaseous effluents, and (3) the dose from 14C released in gaseous effluents to the Member of the Public due to activities within the Site Boundary.

The quantity of 14C discharged can be estimated88 by sample measurements, or by use of a normalized 14C source term and scaling factors based on power generation,89 or by use of the GALE code,9° or by use of the EPRI site specific or proxy methodologies.91 Any of these methodologies is acceptable for estimating the 74C discharged in gaseous effluents.

2)

Assumptions a.

The total quantity of 14C produced during the year is assumed to be released during the year in which it was produced.

b.

The quantity of 140 produced is determined using the methodology in EPRI TR-1021106.

c.

For conservatism, it is assumed that all 4C produced is released in gaseous effluents.

U.

The dose contribution of 14C from liquid effluents is much less than that contributed by gaseous effluents, therefore evaluation of 14C in liquid effluents is not required.92 e.

The dose to the Member of the Public is determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in Regulatory Guide 1.109.

f.

14C has a long half-life with respect to the plume transit time. 14C is discharged as CH4 or CO2 gas and does not deplete or undergo chemical change before it reaches the receptor location. Therefore the appropriate dispersion parameter is XIQ (undecayed and undepleted).

88 Regulatory Guide 1.21, rev. 2, Section 1.9 89 NCRP Report 81 90 NUREG- 0017 91 EPRI TR-1021 106, Section 4.

92 Regulatory Guide I.21 rev. 2, Section 1.9 Page 67 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 g.

The inhalation pathway is assumed to exist at the Nearest Residence location with the highest value of XIQ, undecayed! undepleted as determined by the annual Land Use Census.

h.

The ingestion pathways are assumed to exist at the nearest receptor location with the highest value of XIQ, undecayed! undepleted as determined by the annual Land Use Census. For conservatism, the Nearest Residence location may be considered the highest nearest receptor location for the ingestion pathways.

i.

The appropriate dispersion parameters for activities within the Site Boundary is provided in Table I 0.

i.

14C is not a gamma-emitting nuclide; therefore the ground plane pathway is negligible.

k.

As a first approximation, it is assumed that the child age group exists at the Nearest Residence and ingestion pathway locations.

I.

Only 14C02 discharged during periods of photosynthesis is considered for the ingestion pathways.

m.

All of the 14C produced is assumed to contribute to the inhalation dose pathway, regardless of chemical form.

3)

Applicable Dose Limits JO CFR 50, Appendix I, states, The calculated annual total quantity of all radioactive iodine and radioactive material in particulate form above background to be released from each light-water-cooled nuclear power reactor in effluents to the atmosphere will not result in an estimated annual dose or dose commitment from such radioactive iodine and radioactive material in particulate form for any individual in an unrestricted area from all pathways of exposure in excess of I 5 millirems to any organ.93 Radiological Effluent Control (REC) I 6.1 1.2.3 limits the annual dose to the Member of the Public from 7311, 1331 3H, and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days released in gaseous effluents to I 5 mrem to any organ.94 14C is released as a gas in the form of CH4 or CO2 and is not a radioiodine, tritium, or particulate, therefore the design objectives in 10 CFR 50, Appendix I and the limits of REC 16.11.2.3 do not apply to 14C.

Jo CFR 20.1301(a)(1) limits the annual TEDE dose to the Member ofthe Public to 100 mrem.

93 10 CFR 50, Appendix I, section II, paragraph c 94 NUREG-1301, REC 3.11.2.3 Page 68 of $8 INFORMATION USE June, 2021 I

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 40 CFR 190.10(a) limits the total annual dose from the uranium fuel cycle to the Member of the Public to 25 mrem to the whole body or any organ. 40 CFR I 90 is implemented by REC 16.11.3.1. This limit includes dose from the release of gaseous effluents to areas at or beyond the Site Boundary, the dose from gaseous effluents due to activities within the Site Boundary, and the dose from direct radiation. The methodology for calculating the total annual dose from the uranium fuel cycle is provided in Section 4.

10 CFR 72.104 requires thatthe annual dose equivalentto any real individual who is located beyond the controlled area must not exceed 25 mrem to the whole body, 75 mrem to the thyroid and 25 mrem to any other critical organ as a result of exposure to planned discharges of radioactive materials and direct radiation from Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (lSFSl) operations. There are no radioactive effluents from the ISFSI. The HI-STORM UMAX Canister Storage System does not create any radioactive materials or have any radioactive waste treatment systems. COC Specification 3.1.1, Multi-Purpose Canister (MPC), provides assurance that there are no radioactive effluents from the ISFSI.95 14C is a weak beta emitter and does not contribute to direct radiation dose.

4)

Estimation of 14C in Gaseous Effluents 14C exists in all PWR systems, and any location or system that contains tritium most likely also will contain 14C in some chemical form. Measurements of 14C concentrations in various liquid systems have been performed, and some ofthe reported data are included in EPRI TR-1 021 1 06.96 As a general rule, 4C in the primary coolant is essentially all organic with a significant fraction as a gaseous species. II the RCS liquid or gas is exposed to an oxidizing environment, such as during the forced oxidation during the shutdown evolution and during refueling outages, a slow transformation from an organic to an inorganic chemical form can occur.

Dissolved nitrogen gas and ammonia in the RCS could contribute to the 14C source term.

The dissolved nitrogen could become significant in the latter stages of the fuel cycle due to the introduction of increased quantities of non-borated water for boron dilution.

Callaway maintains a hydrogen gas overpressure on the RCS which effectively eliminates dissolved nitrogen gas and ammonia in the RCS, therefore the RCS ammonia concentration is assumed to be In general, 14C is produced in light water moderated nuclear power reactors by 14N(n,p)14C reactions with nitrogen impurities in the coolant and by 170(n,a)14C reactions in the coolant. 14C produced in a nuclear power reactor can be released directly to the environment from the coolant in a gaseous form or in much smaller quantities as liquid 95 Certificate ofCompliance No. 1040, AppendixA, Specification 5.1.

96 EPRI TR-1021106, Section 4.1 97 CDP-ZZ-00200, Appendix B, Table 1.1, Reactor Coolant System-MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4, page 6 of 23 Page 69 of 8$

INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 effluents.98 Kunz estimated the fraction of 4C in liquid and solid wastes at <5% of that in gaseous discharges99. Regulatory Guide I.21 states that the dose contribution from 4C in liquid discharges is insignificant and evaluation of 14C released in liquid effluents is not required.10° The release and removal pathways from the primary coolant include VCT venting, boron dilution, inventory buildup on the letdown demineralizers and filters, and reactor coolant leakage. Letdown system removal is approximately I Cilyr.101 The 14C production balance is shown in Figure 1.

Source Term-4C Production System Inventory Rcs Gaseous Release Solid Release Waste Gase System Fuel Pool Waste Gas System Liquid Release Pnmary System IX resins &

Containment Vent RadwasteSystems ontnmentP Discharge Monitor Tanks 7pooi IX resins & filters IX resins 9.

Radwaste IX resins Filters Fuel Bldg. Ventilation charcoal ISFSI_Canisters Figure 1:

14C Production Balance 5)

Chemical Form of 14C in Gaseous Effluents Since the PWR operates with a reducing chemical environment, most, if not all, of the 4C species initially produced are in the reduced, i.e., organic, form and contain only a single carbon atom. Possible species include methane (14CH4), methanol (14CH30H),

formaldehyde (H214C=O or the gem-diol H214C(OH)2 ), and formic acid (H14COOH). In theory, the only ionic species produced will be formic acid (H14C02H), and some or all of the formic acid will be removed by the letdown demineralizers. Formaldehyde is soluble in water and may partially be chemisorbed on the ion exchange resin. A quasi-equilibrium is established in the coolant between the initially produced species and other possible species in the reactor coolant. The most chemically reduced species and probably the most prevalent species is 14CH4 which partitions between the liquid and gas phases in the VCT and pressurizer.102 The airborne 14C released from PWRs is predominantly hydrocarbons (7595%), mainly methane (CH4), with only a small fraction 98 IAEA Report 421, Section 3.1.3 99 Kunz, 1985 100 Regulatory Guide I.21, rev. 2, section 1.09 101 EPRI TR-1021 106, Section 4.1 102 EPRI TR-1021 106, Section 4.1 Page 70 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 in the form of CO2.103104 Regulatory Guide I.21 states that 14C releases in PWRs occur primarily as a mix of organic carbon and 002 in gaseous waste from the waste gas system.105 NUREG-0017106 concludes that 16.4% ofthe 4C produced in a PWR will be released via the waste gas processing system, and the remainder, 83.6%, from the Reactor Building and the Auxiliary Building.

Due to the presence of high temperature hydrogen recombiners in the Callaway waste gas system, I 00% of the 14C released through the waste gas system is assumed to be released from the waste gas decay tanks in the oxidized, i.e., inorganic form as CO2.

The 14C released from the unit vent is assumed to be in the reduced (organic) form as CH4, therefore 16.4% ofthe 14C produced is released through the Waste Gas Decay tanks (WGDT) as C02, and 83.6% is released via the Unit Vent as CH4.

6) 14C Source Term Estimation The neutron absorption cross section for the 17O(n,a)14C reaction is shown in Figure 3.

The 170(n,a)14C reaction has a 1/v region and a significant high energy neutron cross section. Given a constant neutron flux and target concentration, the rate of production of a species, Na, in atoms per second is given by:

Where:

Na NT{(G(pt)+ (ae(pe)+(af(pf)}

Na 5 the rate of production, atoms/sec 103 IAEA Report 421

, Section 3.1.3 104 Neeb, section 4.2.4 105 Regulatory Guide 1.21, rev. 2, section 1.09 106 NUREG-001 7, Section 2.2.25.2 Page7l of 88 INFORMATION USE Figure 2: 14C Gaseous Discharge Balance June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 NT is the number of 7Q or 14N target atoms per kg of coolant atis the effective neutron cross section for thermal neutron absorption, cm2 (Pt is the thermal neutron flux, n/cm2-sec Ue 5 the effective neutron cross section for epithermal energy neutron absorption, cm2 (je 5 the epithermal neutron flux, n/cm2-sec Uf S the effective neutron cross section for fast neutron absorption, cm2 (f S the fast neutron flux, n/cm2-sec Figure 3: ENDFIB VII Cross Sections for 170 Table 19: Effective Cross Section for the 170(n,a)14C Reaction in the PWR as a Function of Neutron Energy107 Neutron Group Group Energy Effective Cross Section Thermal 0.625 eV 0.121 barns Epithermal (E)

>0.625 eV - <1 MeV 0.0291 barns Fast (F) 1 MeV 0.1124 barns The source term of each species A, is given by:

Page 72 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021 ENDF/B-VtI 0-17 Principal cross sections U)

C

. 100 I

1 02 1

Energy (MeV) 107 EPRI TR-1021106, Section 4.3.2.2

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 A (Ups) = Na 4 A (pCi)= Na*%a a

3.7E4 Where Aa IS the activity of species a, Na IS the number of atoms of species a, A is the decay constant of species a, in seconds. The 4C production rate from the 170(n,a)14C reaction is calculated for the three group flux distribution according to:108 4

(1E24*%*N*{(Jt(Ot)+(JeOe)+(JfOf)]

C production rate =

3.7E4 Where:

14 Production rate is 14C rate of production, pCi/sec-kg N is the number of target atoms per unit mass of coolant (1.27E22 atoms 17Q/ kg H20);

Ut 5 the effective neutron cross section for thermal neutron absorption, in barns; (Pt 5 the thermal neutron flux, n/cm2-sec; Oe 5 the effective neutron cross section for epithermal energy neutron absorption, in barns; Oe 5 the epithermal neutron flux, n/cm2-sec; Uf 5 the effective neutron cross section for fast neutron absorption, in barns; (f 5 the fast neutron flux, n/cm2-sec; 1.OE-24 is a units conversion factor, I.OE-24 cm2/barn; A is the 4C decay constant, 3.833E-12/sec; and 3.7E4 is a units conversion factor, 3.7E4 d/(sec-pCi).

The activity of 14C produced is thus the product of the production rate, the coolant mass in the active core region, and time:

A Production rate *coolant mass *time Where:

Aj5 the activity of 14C produced, in pCi; The coolant mass is the mass of water in the active core region, in kg, corrected for core average temperature and pressure; The time is the time period of reactor operation, in sec; The Callaway reactor is a Westinghouse Model F, four loop Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) rated at 3565 MWth. The fuel is Westinghouse Vantage+ OFA with I 93 fuel 108 EPRI TR-1021 106, Section 4.3.2.1 Page73 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 assemblies. The mass of coolant in the active core region is 12,925 kg.109 The hydrogen gas overpressure in the Volume Control Tank (VCT) effectively eliminates N2 and NH3 in the RCS, therefore 14C production from the 14N(n,p)14C reaction is insignificant.

The core average neutron flux, the Effective Full Power Years (EFPY), and the fuel burnup are specific to the reactor operation for the period.

7)

Inhalation Dose at the Nearest Residence Location from 14C The child age group is the critical age group for an airborne release of 14C due to higher inhalation dose factors and higher ingestion dose factors.11° The inhalation dose for the child age group, D, is calculated according to the expression111:

Dj=3*17E4*Ra *DFA1.Q1.,)(/Q Where:

D is the dose in mrem, to a member of the public from 14C, from the inhalation pathway, received by organ j; 3.17 E4 is the number of pCi/Ci divided by the number of sec/yr; Ra IS the breathing rate for the child age group (3700 m3/yr);112 DFA is the 14C inhalation pathway dose factor for organ j, appropriate to the child age group (mrem/pCi). For 14C, the limiting organ is the bone. The DFAbone for the child age group is 9.70E-6 mrem/pCi, and the DFAtotai body for the child age group is I.82E-6;113 Qi is the quantity of 14C produced during the year (Ci/yr); and XIQ is the highest calculated annual average concentration at the nearest receptor location (sec/m3).

The inhalation dose to the bone for the child age group at the Nearest Residence location is:

Dbone 1138. Q

. X/Q The inhalation dose to the total body for the child age group at the Nearest Residence location is:

D001 body

= 213. Q1

. X/Q 109 Westinghouse Calculation Note CN-TA-02-1 35, Callaway (SCP) RSG IGOR/RETRAN Ease Deck, May 16, 2003 110 Regulatory Guide 1109, Table E-9, and Table E-13 I 1 1 Regulatory Guide I.109, equations C-3 and C4.

112 RegulatoryGuide 1.109, Table E-5 113 Regulatory Guide 1.109, Table E-9.

Page 74 of 8$

INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1003 Rev. 026 8)

Dose from 14C in Fresh Leafy Vegetation The concentration of 14C in leafy vegetation is calculated by assuming that the 4C ratio to the natural carbon in the vegetation is the same as the ratio of 14C to natural carbon in the atmosphere surrounding the vegetation.114 Only 14C released in the oxide form (CO or C02) is incorporated into the plant material.5 All 14C releasedfrom the waste gas decay tanks is assumed to be CO2. CH4 is not incorporated into plant material, therefore, only CO2 contributes to the ingestion dose pathway. 14C02 released outside the growing season or at night is not incorporated into plant material and does not contribute to the dose from the ingestion pathway. 14CO2 released during the growing season in the daytime is assumed to be incorporated into the plant material and contributes to the ingestion dose pathway. The growing season in mid-Missouri is approximately April 1-November 1 *h16 The concentration of 14C in leafy vegetation is given by:H7 3.17E7Q. *X/Q*O.11 Conc=

I V

0.16 Where:

COflCv 5 the concentration of 14C in leafy vegetation grown at the nearest receptor location (pCi/kg);

3.17E7 is equal to (lEl2pCi/C)(lE3g/kg)/(3.15E7 sec/yr);

Q is the quantity of 14C released as CO2 during periods of photosynthesis (Ci/yr);

X/Q is the highest calculated annual average concentration at the nearest receptor location (sec/m3);

0.1 1 is the fraction of total plant mass that is natural carbon, dimensionless; and 0.16 is the concentration of natural carbon in the atmosphere (gIm3).

Substitution of constants yields:

concv = 2.2E7*Q1.X/Q The leafy vegetation ingestion dose for the Child age group at the nearest receptor location is given by:118 D =DFIj *U0 *Conç Where:

114 Regulatory Guide 1.109, Appendix C 115 Regulatory Guide 1.109, Appendix C 116 Hammer, 0. R.

117 Regulatory Guide 1.109, equation C-8 118 Regulatory Guide 1.109, equation C-13 Page 75 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 D is the annual dose to the bone or total body for the child age group from ingestion of fresh leafy vegetation, (mrem/yr);

DFI is the ingestion dose conversion factor for the maximum exposed organ. For the child age group, the bone is the maximum exposed organ. The DFlbone 5 I.21 E5 mrem/pCi ingested and the DFltotalbody 5 2.42E6 mrem/pCi ingested;119 fi is the fraction of leafy vegetation grown in the garden at the nearest receptor location. f1 = I.0;120 and Ua 5 the ingestion rate of leafy vegetation. For the child age group, Ua 26 kg/yr.121 9)

Dose from 14C in Milk The concentration of 14C in milk is determined as122:

COflCmiIk Fm Conç,

QF etf Where:

COflCmjIk 5 the concentration of 14C in milk, in pCi/L; Fm 5 the average fraction of the animals daily intake of 14C which appears in each literofmilk, in days/L. Forcow milk, Fm is 1.2E2 days/L.123 Forgoat milk, Fm i5 0.10 days/L;124 COflCv i5 the concentration of 14C in leafy vegetation grown at the receptor location (pCi/kg), as described above; QF 5 the amount of feed consumed by the animal per day, in kg/day. For cows, QF 5 equal to 50 kg/day and for goats QF is equal to 6 kg/day;125 tf 5 the average transport time of the 14C from the feed into the milk and to the receptor (a value of 2 days is assumed): and A is the radiological decay constant for 14C, 3.32E-7 days1.

The dose from 14C in milk is determined as:

D = DFI. Ua COflCmiIk Where:

D is the annual dose to the bone or total body for the child age group from milk ingestion, (mrem/yr);

119 Regulatory Guide 1.109, Table E-13 120 Regulatory Guide 1.109, Table E-15 121 Regulatory Guide I

. I 09, Table E-5 122 Regulatory Guide 1.109, equation c-io 123 Regulatory Guide 1.109, Table E-1 124 Regulatory Guide 1.109, Table E-2 125 Regulatory Guide 1.109, Table E-3 Page 76 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 DFI is the ingestion dose conversion factor for the maximum exposed organ. For the child age group, the bone is the maximum exposed organ. The DFlbone 5 1.21 E5 mrem/pCi ingested and the DFltotalbody is 2.42E6 mrem/pCi ingested;126 and Ua 15 the ingestion rate for milk. For the child age group, Ua 330 LIyr (for both cow and goat milk).127 10)

Dose from 14C in Meat The concentration of 14C in meat is determined as128:

COflCmeat

3. 1E-2. Conç 50 Where:

COflCmeat 5 the concentration of 14C in meat, in pCi/kg; 3.1 E-02 is the stable element transfer factor, in days/kg, for beef129 COflC iS the concentration of 14C in leafy vegetation grown at the receptor location (pCi/kg), as described above; 50 kg/day is the amount of feed consumed by the beef animal per day;13° 20 days is the average time from slaughter to consumptio&31: and 3.32E-7 days1 is the radiological decay constant for 14C.

The dose from 14C in meat is determined as:

D = DFI*U *COflCmeat Where:

D is the annual dose to the bone or total body for the child age group from milk ingestion, (mrem/yr);

DFI is the ingestion dose conversion factor for the maximum exposed organ. For the child age group, the bone is the maximum exposed organ. The DFlbone is I.21 E5 mrem/pCi ingested and the DFltotalbody 5 2.42E6 mrem/pCi ingested;132 and Ua is the ingestion rate for meat. For the child age group, Ua 41 kg/yr.133 I I )

Dose to the Member of the Public from Activities within the Site Boundary 126 Regulatory Guide 1.109, Table E-13 127 Regulatory Guide 1.109, Table E-5 128 Regulatory Guide 1.109, equation C-12 129 Regulatory Guide 1.109, Table E-1 130 Regulatory Guide 1.109, Table E-3 131 Regulatory Guide 1.109, Table E-15 132 Regulatory Guide 1.109, Table E-13 133 Regulatory Guide 1.109, Table E-5 Page 77 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 The Member of the Public performing activities within the Site Boundary is described in Section 4. The ingestion dose pathways do not exist within the Site Boundary. 14C is not a gamma-emitting nuclide; therefore the ground plane pathway is negligible.

The inhalation dose, D, is calculated according to the expression134:

Dj=3*17E4*Ra *DFA1 *Q, X/Q*1.26E-1 Where:

D is the dose in mrem, to a member of the public from 14C, from the inhalation pathway, received by organ j; 3.17 E4 is the number of pCi/Ci divided by the number of sec/yr; Ra 15 the breathing rate for the adult age group (8000 m3/yr);135 DFA1 is the 14C inhalation pathway dose factor for organ j, appropriate to the adult age group (mrem/pCi). For 14C, the limiting organ is the bone. The DFAne for the adult age group is 2.27E-6 mrem/pCi, and the DFAtotai body and DFAthyroid 5 4.26E7 136 Qi is the quantity of 14C produced during the year (Ci/yr)

X/Q is the highest calculated annual average concentration for activities within the Site Boundary, as shown in Table 10.

I.26E-J is the fraction of the year the farmer performs activities within the Site Boundary (1 100 hrs/8760 hrs), dimensionless.

134 Regulatory Guide I.109, equations C-3 and C-4 135 Regulatory Guide 1.109, Table E-5 136 Regulatory Guide 1.109, Table E-7 Page 78 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 12)

Alternate Methodologies Regulatory Guide I.21 states that the following methods are acceptable for estimating the production of 14C:137 Sampling and analysis of effluent streams Use of normalized 14C source term and scaling factors based on power generation, e.g., NCRP Report 81138 Use of the PWR GALE code139 Callaway Plant effluents have not been sampled for 14C. NCRP Report 81, Table 3.3 states that the total 14C production rate for a PWR without reactor coolant nitrogen is 6 Ci/GWeyr. Assuming a conversion of 0.34 GWJGWth, the expected 140 production rate is 2 Ci/GWh-yr or 7.2 Ci/EFPY for Callaway, which is significantly lower than the quantity of 14C calculated using the EPRI methodology. The PWR GALE code does not calculate the quantity of 14C produced, but instead assigns a value of 7.3 Ci/yr for every PWR without regard for power level, reactor coolant nitrogen concentration, or waste gas system design and operation. Again, this is significantly lower than the quantity of 14C calculated using the EPRI methodology. For example, using the EPRI methodology and the neutron flux distribution for Cycle 1 8, the 14C production for Callaway is I 3.2 Ci/EFPY.14° The 14C production calculated using the EPRI methodology is therefore conservative with respect to the methodologies mentioned in Regulatory Guide I.21, rev. 2.

The EPRI methodology also provides for a PWR proxy calculation. The average 14C production rate for Westinghouse PWRs is 3.4 Ci! GWth-yr141. Callaway is rated at 3.565 GWth (3565 MWth), therefore, the 14C production rate based on the proxy PWR is 12.1 Ci! EFPY. The 14C production calculated using the EPRI proxy methodology is therefore conservative with respect to the acceptable methodologies described in Regulatory Guide 1.21, rev. 2.

137 Regulatory Guide 1.21, Section 1.9 138 NCRP Report 81 139 NUREG-0017 140 HPCI 1102 141 EPRI TR-1021 106, Section 4.8 and Appendix D Page 79 of $8 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-OJ 003 Rev. 026 Appendix B: Record of Revisions142 Rev. No.

0 Date:

March 1983 Rev. No.

I Date:

November, 1983 Revised to support the current RETS submittal and to incorporate NRC Staff comments.

Rev. No.

2 Date:

March, 1984 Revised to incorporate NRC Staff comments Rev. No.

3 Date:

June, 1985 Revised to incorporate errata identified by ULNRCOO8O3 and changes to the Environmental Monitoring Program. Incorporate results of I 984 Land Use Census.

Rev. No.

4 Date:

February, 1987 Minor clarifications, incorporated 31-day projected dose methodology. Change in the utilization of areas within the Site Boundary.

Rev. No.

5 Date:

January, 1988 Minor clarifications, revised descriptions of liquid and gaseous rad monitors, revised liquid setpoint methodology to incorporate monitor background, revised dose calculations for 4OCFRI9O requirements, Revised Table 6 and Figures 5.IA and 5.IB to refine descriptions of environmental TLD stations, incorporated description of environmental TLD testing required by Reg. Guide 4.13, revised Tables I, 2, 4 and 5 to add additional nuclides, deleted redundant material from Chapter 6.

Rev. No.

6 Date:

May, 1989 Revised methodology for calculating maximum permissible liquid effluent discharge rates and liquid effluent discharge rates and liquid effluent monitor setpoints, provided methodology for calculating liquid effluent monitors response correction factors, provided an enhanced description of controls on liquid monitor background limits, provided additional liquid and gaseous dose conversion factors and bioaccumulation factors (Tables I, 2, 4 & 5), provided description of the use ofthe setpoint required by Technical Specification 4.9.4.2 during Core Alterations, added discussion of gaseous and liquid monitor setpoint selection in the event that the sample contains no detectable activity, added minimum holdup requirements for Waste Gas Decay tanks, revised dispersion parameters and accompanying description per FSAR Change Notice 88-42.

APA-ZZ-OJ 003 Rev. No.

0 Date:

August, 1989 Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications were moved from the Callaway Plant Technical Specifications to Section 9.0, Radioactive Effluent Controls, of the ODCM per NRC Generic Letter 89-01

. At the same time, in order to formalize control of the entire ODCM, it was converted to APA-ZZ-01003, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual.

142 Section numbers, table numbers, etc. refer to the numbering schema used in the particular revision.

Page 80 of $8 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Rev. No.

I Date:

October, 1990 Revise Action 41 of Table 9.2-A to allow continued purging for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months per Amendment 20 to operating license, issued 4/10/87.

Rev. No.

2 Date:

May, 1991 Section 2.4.2: Changed gross alpha analysis frequency from each batch to a monthly composite per Table 9.3-A, and the Callaway Plant NPDES permit (reissued March 1 5, 1991).

Rev. No.

3 Date:

June, 1993 Deleted HF-RE-45 and LE-RE-59 as effluent monitors. Revised table numbering for consistency with those in Section 9.0, deleted redundant material, incorporated I 992 Land Use Census results, moved LLD description to Attachment I, moved REC Bases to Attachment 2. Deleted reporting requirements for solid radwaste, which are described in APA-ZZ-01 01 1, Process Control Program. Addressed compliance with 10 CFR 20.1301. Revised the dilution flow rate to allow values other than 5000 gpm, based on dilution flow monitor setpoint. Revised MPC terminology to ECV. Added Action 46 to REC 9.2 to clarify actions for inoperable mid and high range WRGM Channels. Revised references to be consistent with the revised 1 0 CFR 20.

Added Appendix A. Revised Action 41 of Rec 9.2 and the operability requirements of GT-RE-22/33. Incorporated the revised Ri values in Tables 3.2 and 3.3. Added Section 6.2 and Table 6.5.

Rev. No.

4 Date:

September, 1994 Increased the minimum channels OPERABLE requirement of REC 9.2 for GT-RE-22 & 33 from I channel to 2 channels. Revised Action 41 and the Bases for REC 9.2 accordingly. Incorporated the operability requirements from Tech Spec 3.9.9 into the Action statement for clarity. (Refer to CARS 199401176).

Rev. No.

5 Date:

February, 1995 Removed the REMP station locations. Removed particulate nuclides with a half-life of less than 8 days from Tables 3.2-3.4 and removed 14C, 32P, 63Ni, and l25mTe from Tables 2.1, 2.2, 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4. Changed the reporting frequency of the Effluent Release Report from semiannual to annual. Removed the meat, milk and vegetable pathway dispersion parameters from Tables 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3, and clarified the applicability of the dispersion parameters and dose locations in Table 6.4. Relocated REC 9. 1 and 9.2 to the FSAR. Revised footnotes 3 and 7 of Table I 6. I I -4 to require additional sampling of the Unit Vent in the event of a reactor power transient, only if the Unit Vent noble gas activity increases by a factor of 3 or greater. Added Section 4.1.3.1.3 for determination of dose due to the on-site storage of low level radioactive waste.

Rev. No.

6 Date September, 1996 Section 2:Added dose factors (Ajfor HOrn Ag, 237Np, 238Pu, 2391240Pu, 241Pu, 241Am, 242Cm, and 2341244Cm to Table 2.1, and Bioaccumulation Factors (Bf) for Ag, Pu, Am, and Cm to Table 2.2 due to a change in the liquid radwaste treatment process. Revised the description of the methodology for performing the 31 day dose projection in Section 2.5. Revised the maximum allowable background for HB-RE-18. Section 3: Eliminated 91my and 99mTc from Table 3.4 (Meat Pathway) due to a half-life of < 8 days. Substituted the phrase more restrictive in lieu of lesser in Section 3.2. Revised the definition of Fa in equation 3.1. Added description of use of samples to verify dose rates in Section 3.3.1.2. Augmented the definition of qi in Section 3.3.2.1. Edited Page 81 of $8 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 equations 3.13 and 3.14 and added equation 3.15 to clarify dose calculations. Revised the methodology for performing the 31 day dose projection in Section 3.4. Section 4: Strengthened the discussion of the reevaluation of assumptions in Section 4.1.3. Section 6:

Added new Table 6.6 to describe the selection and use of dispersion parameters during the preparation of the Effluent Release Report. Updated Tables 6.1 and 6.2 to reference the 1995 Land Use Census.

There were no changes in the receptor locations. Section 8: Replaced the reference to HDP-ZZ-04500 to a more generic reference to the plant operating procedures, due to change in organizational structure and responsibilities. Section 9: (1) Eliminated 9.0.1 and 9.0.2 due to redundancy with Technical Specifications 3.0.1 and 3.0.2; (2) Revised Table 9.3-A to incorporate sampling and analysis requirements for TRU nuclides in liquid effluents; (3) Eliminated sampling of Fuel Building Exhaust from Table 16.11-4 and the associated footnotes due to redundancy with Unit Vent sampling; revised the continuous sampling requirements for the gaseous batch release points consistent with plant design; revised the 3H analysis frequency for Purges from weekly to prior to each purge; and, (4) Revised the air sampling station location criteria on Table 9.11-A and footnote # 1, and eliminated footnote #3 in order to be less generic and more descriptive of the parameters used in determining the station locations (See CARS I 99502280).Revised the location requirements for milk and vegetables.

Revised description of use of baseline samples to trigger gamma isotopic analysis in footnote #4, revised requirement for location of downstream sample station in footnote #6. Revised Surveillance Requirement 9.10.2.1 to eliminate liquid effluents from the surveillance. (5)

Revised REC 9.5 and REC 9.9 to eliminate exceptions for partially tested effluents being released in excess ofthe respective limit. Section 11 : Added reference I I.14.13.Attachment 2: Revised the Bases for REC 9.1 0 to support the elimination of liquid effluents from Surveillance 9.10.2.1.The remaining changes are editorial in nature and have no technical impact.(This revision implements CARS 199502055, CARS 199600167, CARS 199600961, CARS 199502280, and CARS 199600986).

Rev. No.

7 Date February, 1997 Section 9: (1) REC 9.5, Liquid Radwaste Treatment System, Action statement: Eliminated reference to COMN 1161 (2) Table 9.11-A, items 4a (milk) and 4c (vegetation): revised to required control stations in the least prevalent wind direction. (See CARS 199700166). Appendix A: revised the discussion relative to the appropriate gross alpha Effluent Concentration Value.

Rev. No.

8 Date May, 1997 Section 1 : The Purpose and Scope was revised to describe the split of the ODCM into two sections Per FSAR Change Notice 95-058. Section 2: Sections 2.2 and 2.3 were revised to clarify the use of nuclide-specific alpha activity vice gross alpha activity for setpoint determination. Section 2.5 was revised to delete the description of the Liquid Radwaste Treatment System. Section 6: Tables 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3 were revised to reflectthe results of the I 996 Annual Land Use Census. Section 7: The reporting requirements for the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report and the Effluent Release Report were relocated to the FSAR Per FSAR Change Notice 95-058. Section 9: RECs and the supporting Attachments I and 2 were relocated to the FSAR Per FSAR Change Notice 95-058. Appendix A: Appendix A was deleted. Editorial changes were made throughout the ODCM reflecting the relocation of the RECs to the FSAR.

Rev. No.

9 Date March, 1998 Page82 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Section 2.5: Revised projected liquid dose calculation to use previous 31 day cumulative doses.

Section 3.1.1 Added GL-RE-202, Laundry Decon Facility Dryer Exhaust Monitor. Added action to be taken when the particulate and/or iodine grab sampler is not operable. Section 3.2: Added setpoint calculation for GL-RE-202. Section 3.2.1 and 3.3.2.2: Changes were made to correct typographical errors and have no technical impact. Section 3.4: Revised projected gas dose calculation to use previous 31 day cumulative doses. Section 3.5: Removed the word secular from secular equilibrium since the equilibrium mode could be secular or transient depending on the isotope. Table 6.2: Added Laundry Decon Facility Dryer Exhaust to title of table since these will be the dispersion factors used for this release point.

Rev. No.

JO Date December 20, 1999 Section 3.1 : Added explanation that GL-RE-202 only monitors particulate. Section 3.2:

Changed Laundry Decon Facility Exhaust Monitor setpoint to less than or equal to 2000 cpm above equilibrium background with a maximum allowed background of 2000 cpm as calculated in HPCI 9905. Tables 6.1

, 6.2, 6.3: Updated values as calculated in HPCI 9902. Section 5.1:

Defined how REMP sample locations were determined. Removed reference to Plant Operating manual since it no longer exists.

Rev. No.

11 Date December 22, 1999 Changes required to go from old Technical Specifications to Improved Technical Specifications (ITS). Technical Specification 4.9.4.2 changed to FSAR 16.1 1.2.4.1. Technical Specification 6.8.4.F changed to FSAR 16.1 1.4. Technical Specification 6.8.1.F changed to Improved Technical Specification 5.4.1. Technical Specification 6.14 changed to Improved Technical Specification 5.5.1

. Technical Specification 6.8.4.E changed to Improved Technical Specification 5.5.4. Technical Specification 6.9.1.6 changed to Improved Technical Specification 5.6.2.

Technical Specification 6.9.1.7 changed to Improved Technical Specification 5.6.3. Changed name of Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report to Effluent Release Report as stated in ITS.

Added liquid releases are limited to I 0 times the Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2 limits Per FSAR CN 98-041 supporting implementation of ITS.

Rev. No.

12 Date December 01, 2000 Section 2.1 and 2.2.1: Updated IOCFR2O, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 reference to the new I OCFR2O format. Corrected typo for f, flow setpoint should be undiluted waste flow rate.

Section 3.2.1 : Corrected typo, default value for safety factor should be 0.1

. Section 5.1 : Updated crosscheck program used to EML since EPA program is no longer available. Section 6.2: Added vertical height of highest adjacent building used to perform concurrent year annual average atmospheric dispersion (XIQ) calculations and reference for this value. This information should be documented in the ODCM. Added responsibility for validation of meteorological data, since responsibility has changed from engineering to HPTS. Section 10.1.1 : Revised to require a summary of Major Radwaste System changes to be included in the annual report. This was done to be consistent with FSAR 16.11.5.2. Several changes were made throughoutthe procedure to correct typographical errors and have no technical impact.

Rev. No.

13 Date September 19, 2002 Section 3.2: Revised to implement the approved OL 121 8, Rev. I ; License Amendment no. I 52 allowing equipment hatch and emergency air lock to remain open during refueling activities (FSAR CN-01-030 and CN-02-049). The amendment eliminated FSAR 16.1 1.2.4.IB and subsequently deleted the core alteration setpoint value 5.0 E-3 pCi/cc for Containment Purge Page83 of 8$

INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Monitors GT-RE-22 and GT-RE-33. The alarm setpoints for the Containment Purge Monitors will be based on the methodology described in Section 3 of the ODCM.

Rev. No.

14 Date June 17, 2003 Revised Table 2.1 (Ingestion Dose Commitment Factor for Adult Age Group) to include dose factors for Pr-144. (CARS 200303251). Revised Section 4.1.3.1 to adjustthe Farmers residence (critical receptor) from 3830 meters in the SE sector to 2897 meters in the NNW sector. The Farmers residence (critical receptor) was changed in 2002 to a location directly across the street from the Nearest residence. For conservatism and ease in calculation, Table 6.1 and 6.2 were revised making the distances and dispersion parameters for the Farmers residence (critical receptor) and the Nearest residence the same. Revised section 7.2 to reference Table 6.6.

Revised section 1 0.2.2 to remove the requirement for QA department review of the ODCM for reach revision (CARS 200304509). Added a reference to I I.14.14, Calculation HPCI 0304 (Rev.

0), Calculation of Liquid Effluent Dose Commitment factor for Pr-144 (AiT) for the Adult Age Group, June, 2003.

Rev. No.

15 Date December 9, 2004 Reformatted references to FSAR-SP Chapterl6.11 in section 1, 2.1.1, 2.12, 2.2.1, 2.3, 2.4.2, 2.5, 2.6, 3.1, 3.2.1, 3.5, 5.1

, 7.1

, 7.2, and 9. References to 63Ni were added to section 2.2.1 for the calculation of ECVSUM, section 2.3, and described in section 2.6 since it is an exception to non-gamma emitters not listed in FSAR-SP Table 16.11-1

. 63Ni was added to the ODCM based on previous I 0 CFR 61 sample results and 2nd quarter liquid composite analyses. Consolidated references listed in section 2.4.2 and 2.6 for the site related ingestion dose commitment factors (AiT of Table 2. 1 into HPCI 0406, Revision I. References to HPCI 9504 (Ref: I I

. I 4. 1 3) and HPCI 0304 (Ref: I I.14.14) were deleted and replaced with HPCI 0406, Revision I which is now listed as Ref: 11.14.13. Added 63Ni and 122Sb to Table 2.1-INGESTION DOSE COMMITMENT FACTOR (AlT) FOR ADULT AGE GROUP. Revised the reference for Table 2.1 to I I.14.13.

Corrected a typo in section 3.1.2 referring to the Radwaste Building Vent system designator as GT vs. GH (CAR 200406851). References 11.19 and 11.20 were deleted in section 4.1.3.1.1.

Reference I I.18 was changed to MicroShield (Grove Engineering, Inc.) vs. ISOSHLD.

Reference 11.24 in section 4.1.3.1.3 was correctedto 11.18. Section 5.1 and 5.2 were revised to indicate that the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program TLDs will be processed and provided by a vendor laboratory beginning in the first quarter of 2005. Section 5.2 was revised to delete reference 11.14.10 which refers to HPCI 8808, Performance Testing ofthe Environment TLD System at Callaway Plant, August 1 989. Reference I I

. I 4.7 was corrected with HPCI 8710 vice HPCI 881 0. Revised Table 6.1

, Note (c) to reference FSAR Table 2.3-83 vs. Table 2.3-82.

Revised Table 6.1 and 6.2 Note (b) to reference data is from the 2002 Land Use Census.

Changed and/or corrected the Skin dose factor (Li) units in Table 3.1 (Dose Factor for exposure to a Semi-Infinite Cloud of Noble Gases) to mrem/yr per uCi/m3. Revised section 3.3.1.2: Added units for the term BR in m3/yr. Removed paragraph in section 3.3.2.2 that describes actions for implementing the use of appropriate values. This paragraph was taken directly from section 5.3.1 of NUREG 0133, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specification for Nuclear Power Plants, USNRC NUREG-Ol 33, Washington, D.C. 20555, October, 1 978. This paragraph does not apply since the use of pathways is already considered as described in sections 4.1.2 and 4.1.3.1. Revised note (c) ofTable 6.1 to reference FSAR-SA Table 2.3-83. Revised note (a) from Table 6.1 to reference FSAR-SA Table 2.3-82. In addition, revised Note (b) from Table 6.1 to reference data taken from the 2002 Land Use Census. Revised Notes (a) and (c) from Table 6.2 to reference FSAR-SA Table 2.3-84 and 2.3-Page 84 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 81 respectively. Added a 095 conservatism factor to section 2.2.3 Calculation ofLiquid Effluent Monitor Setpoint. This will conservatively reduce the liquid monitor setpoint to further ensure the section 4.4.1 of NUREG 0133, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specification for Nuclear Power Plants, USNRC NUREG-0133, Washington, D.C. 20555, October, 1978 which states the alarm and trip setpoints for each instrument channel listed in Table 3.3-1 1 should be provided and should correspond to a value(s) which represents a safe margin of assurance that the instantaneous liquid release limit of I 0 CFR Part 20 is not exceeded. A determination was made IAWT/S 5.5.1 thatthe associated changes with Revision 15 maintain the levels of radioactive effluent control required by 10 CFR 20.1302, 40 CFR 190, 10 CFR 50.36a, and 10 CFR 50 Appendix I, and not adversely impactthe accuracy or reliability of effluent, dose, or setpoint calculations.

Rev. No.

16 Date December 1, 2005 Section 5.1 was revised to remove an invalid requirement that a third-party laboratory performing analysis specifically state the Interlaboratory Comparison (crosscheck) requirements for the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) contract lab. Reference 11.14.14 to Reg. Guide 4.1 5, Quality Assurance for Radiological Monitoring Programs (Normal Operations)- Effluent Streams and the Environment, was added to provide supporting documentation for contract lab Interlaboratory Comparison requirements. Additional information on REMP contract lab participation in lnterlaboratory Comparisons was also added in section 5.1.

(CAR 200500891) Revised reference I I.14.7 by adding normalization and standardization factors for radionuclides listed in Table 2.1 of the ODCM that were not included in the original calculation.

Added section 4.1.3.1.4 to describe direct dose to a Member ofthe Public from the Old Steam Generator Storage Facility (OSGSF). Reworded step 4.1.2 to describe the sources of direct radiation from outside storage tanks to storage of radioactive material. Revised section 4.1.3.1.2 to include and describe directdose calculations in support of Modification 03-1 008, Equipment Hatch Platform and Missile Shield Modification. Reference I I.14.1 0 was added to reference direct dose calculation to the Member of the Public from Modification 03-1008. Revised section 4.1.3.1.3 to include and describe direct dose calculations from the Radwaste Yard RAM storage and Stores II. Reference 11.19 and 11.20 were added to reference direct dose calculations to the Member of the Public from RAM storage at Stores II and the Radwaste Yard. A determination was made IAWT/S 5.5.1 thatthe associated changes with Revision 16 maintain the levels of radioactive effluent control required by 10 CFR 20.1302, 40 CFR 190, 10 CFR 50.36a, and 10 CFR 50 Appendix I, and not adversely impactthe accuracy or reliability of effluent, dose, or setpoint calculations.

Rev. No.

17 Date March 14, 2007 Section 2.4.1 was revised Per CAR 200701 309 to state that no potable water intakes exist within I 0 miles of the plant discharge point. This is due to the fact that the Annual Land Use Census ensures no newly developed potable water intakes within I 0 miles of the plant discharge Per FSAR-SP Chapter 16.1 1.4.2c. Section 2.4.2 was revised to add reference I I.6.18 to CAR 200700053 which provides documentation of an evaluation of the site specific mixing factor for liquid effluents. Modification 06-0061 reconfigured the plant discharge terminus at the Missouri River. The modification was completed in January 2007.

Rev. No.

1$

Date October 1 1, 2007 Revised Table 6.5 was revised to reflect upgrade/replacement of the primary meteorological tower instrumentation as per Modification Package 04-1020. Section 2.4.2 was Page 85 of 8$

INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 revised to remove the discussion of the nearest municipal potable water intake downstream from the liquid effluent discharge point as being located near the city of St. Louis, Missouri, approximately 78 miles downstream. Since the Land Use Census annually verifies no potable water intakes within I 0 miles this discussion was deemed inappropriate in describing methodology for calculating dose to the public from liquid effluents. In addition, the distance referenced as not having potable water intakes downstream of the plant discharge was changed for consistency with section 2.4.1 and the Land Use Census.

Rev. No.

19 Date August, 2012 Converted to Word 2010, including appropriate formatting changes and cross-referencing for the conversion. Deleted all references to the obsolete Commitment Tracking System (COMN) and all hidden text for the obsolete hidden text referencing system. Added level of use. (CAR 201104163, Action 1) Section 3.4-Added dose reduction controls for discharge of 14C from the waste gas system and defined the growing season. Section 3.5-Deleted statement that non-gamma emitting nuclides not listed in the FSAR-SP Table 16.11.4 are not considered in dose calculations. Eliminated Sections 4.1.3.1.1

, 4.1.3.1.2, 4.1.3.1.3, and 4.1.3.1.4-direct radiation dose is negligible; refer to HPCI 1206. Section 5.2-changed to allow use of dosimeters other than TLDs. Section 6.1-Deleted discussion of short-term XIQ processing and the slope factor and deleted the associated table of 5 factors. Section 6.2-Deleted designation of responsibilities for met data review. (CAR 201 1 04163, Action 1) Section 1 0.2-changed to align with T/S 5.5.1

. CAR 201 104163, Action 2) Corrected the department title to align with organizational structure. (CAR 201104163, Action 1). Table 10 and Table 11-The dispersion parameters for the Farmers residence were removed. As a first approximation, the dispersion parameters for the Nearest Residence will be used for the Farmers residence. Appendix A-Appendix A was added to describe the calculation of the production of 14C and the calculation of dose from 14C in gaseous effluents. (CAR 201104163) 63Ni was added to the gaseous effluent inhalation pathway and ingestion pathways dose factor tables. Values for 63Ni are from APA-ZZ 01 003, rev. 4. (CAR 201 1 041 97). Adult ingestion dose factors removed. Ingestion dose pathway removed from Table I 3 for activities inside the Site Boundary.

Rev. No.

20 Date April, 2015 Revised Table 10 to implementthe recalculated dispersion parameters using 2009-2013 meteorology. Deleted Table I I as described in HPCII 503. Added HPCII 502, HPCII 503, HPCII5O4, & HPCII5O5 as references. Deleted reference to ZZ-67. Added ISFSI to Appendix A, Figure 1

. Revised Section 6 to describe the recalculation of the long-term dispersion parameters.

Deleted Section 8; following sections were renumbered accordingly.

Rev. No.

21 Date May, 2015 Revised Table I 0 to correct the dispersion parameters for the Site Boundary and Nearest Resident locations and edited to two significant digits for consistency with the remainder of Table

10. (CAR 201502908)

Rev.No.

22 Date March,2017 The following changes implement CRs 201604927, 201602733, 201603668, and 201602733:

The methodology used to calculate the A values was added to section 2.4.2. Default setpoint values for GTRE2I B and GHREI OB were added to section 3.2. Deleted the specific years of the meteorological data in section 6.1 and instead stated the dispersion parameters represent five years of on-site data to eliminate a potential error trap. The HPCI referenced in section 6.1 Page 86 of $8 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 provides the necessary level of detail, including the years represented by the data. A footnote was added to section 6.1.2 to clarify that the farmer is a composite and not an actual person.

Section 6.2 was revised to clarify the quality check of the meteorological data prior to processing.

Section 1 0, Bibliography was revised to add new references and to update the revision level of CDP-ZZ-00200. 126Sb was added to Table I

. Table 12 was revised to change the Farmers Residence to the Nearest Resident because the farming plots are now leased to multiple farmers and it is not feasible to calculate dose to multiple farmers residences. The footnote in Table 12 regarding 3H dispersion parameters was moved into the table. 14C was added to Table

12. Appendix A was reformatted for better readability. Appendix A, Section 2, Assumptions was revised to clarify the assumptions, principally dispersion parameter use and the dose pathways and locations. Appendix A, Section 3, Applicable Dose Limits, was revised to add I 0 CFR 72.104. Appendix A, Section 11

, Dose to the Member of the Public from Activities Wthin the Site Boundary, was revised to eliminate the value of the XIQ for activities within the Site Boundary and to instead refer to Table I 0 as the source for the XIQ. The three condensed form equations were likewise eliminated. This eliminated an error trap in that the X/Q could be revised and it may not be recognized that the specific value was stated in the text of Appendix A, Section 1 1.

Appendix A, Section 12 was edited for readability.

Rev. No.

23 Date June, 2018 Section 5.1 was revised to delete the phrase referring to HPCI 9901 because HPCI 9901 is obsolete. HPCI I 506, rev. I, superseded portions of of HPCI 9901

, the remainder is superseded by HTP-ZZ-DTI-REMP-SMPL-SCHED, REMP Sample Locations and Analysis Schedule. (CR 201 705399) Section 1 0, Bibliography, was revised to update the revision level of CDP-ZZ 00200, Appendix B, ANSI N42.18-2004 (redesignation ofANSI N13.10-1974), and HPCI 1604.

Table I was revised to add the Dose Commitment Factors for fl7mSn (CR 201706108) Format changes are not marked with revision bars.

Rev. No.

24 Date September, 2019 Added pathway dose factors (Ri) for adult inhalation and ingestion dose pathways for gaseous effluents (Tables 14-18) from ZZ-78, rev.2. (CR 201903925)

Added references for all the dose tables.

Added Grass-Cow to titles of Tables 8 and 17.

Appendix A, Section 8: Removed the terms inorganic and organic when referring to C02 and CH4.

Format changes are not marked with revision bars.

Rev. No.

25 Date December, 2020 Section 2.1 was revised to include new requirements for dilution flow in the current NPDES permit (effective 7/1/2020). Special condition #3 ofthe 7/1/2020 NPDES permit requires a minimum of 3000 gpm dilution flow from outfalls #002, Cooling Tower Blowdown and #016, Cooling Tower Bypass (CR 202003290-001). Table 10, Farming Areas within the Site Boundary was revised with HPCI I 502, rev 1 dispersion parameters. The only affected parameter was DIQ (CR 202005158-002). Section 2.1.1. was revised to remove BM-RE-52 as the continuous liquid discharge pathway no longer exists due to MP I 9-01 1 4 (BT 202002245-002).

Page87 of 8$

INFORMATION USE June, 2021

APA-ZZ-O1 003 Rev. 026 Rev. No.

26 Date June, 2021 Section 4.1 was revised to remove reference to skin dose calculations (CR 202102269). Noble gas organ dose equations 26 and 27 were added to sections 4.1.2. and 4.1.3.1, respectively (CR 202102269). These equations were derived using equation 15. Typographical errors in Table 12 and the associated footnote were also identified and corrected in this revision. The footnote was not updated to reflect the current methodology for calculating historical dispersion values in revision 025. When incorporating the C-14 dose calculation information into table 12 from appendix A, there was a copy and paste error. Dose calculation of C-14 has always incorporated the historical dispersion value for both the child and adult controlling age groups.

Page 88 of 88 INFORMATION USE June, 2021

CALLAWAY - SP 16.11 OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM 9.0) RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT CONTROLS 16.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENT 16.11.tl LIQUID EFFLUENTS CONCENTRATION LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION (ODCM 9.3.1)

The concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see Figure 16.11-1) shall be limited to 10 times the concentration values in Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2 to I 0 CFR 20. 1 001 -202402, for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2 x iO microCurie/mI total activity.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

With the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS exceeding the above limits, immediately restore the concentration to within the above limits.

16.11.1

. I.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (ODCM 9.3.2) 16.11.1.1.1.a Radioactive liquid wastes shall be sampled and analyzed according to the sampling and analysis program ofTable 16.11-1.

16.11.1.1.1.b The results of the radioactivity analysis shall be used in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM to assure that the concentrations at the point of release are maintained within the limits of Section 16.11.1.1.

16.11.1.1.2 BASES This section is provided to ensure that the concentration of radioactive materials released in liquid waste effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be less than I 0 times the concentration in Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2 to 10 CFR 20.1001-20.2402. This limitation provides additional assurance that the levels of radioactive materials in bodies of water in UNRESTRICTED AREAS will result in exposures within:

(1 ) the Section II.A design objectives ofAppendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC, and 16.11-1 Rev. OL-26b 4/23 I

I

CALLAWAY - SP (2) the limits of 10 CFR Part 20.1301 to the population. The concentration limit for dissolved or entrained noble gases is based upon the assumption that Xe-I 35 is the controlling radioisotope and its MPC in air (submersion) was converted to an equivalent concentration in water using the methods described in International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 2.

The required detection capabilities for radioactive materials in liquid waste samples are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs).

16.1 1-2 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY

- SP 16.11.1.2 DOSE FROM LIQUID EFFLUENTS LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION (ODCM 9.4.1)

The dose or dose commftment to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from radioactive materials in liquid effluents released, from each unit, to UNRESTRICTEDAREAS (see Figure 16.11-1) shall be limited:

a.

During any calendar quarter to less than or equal to I.5 mrems to the whole body and to less than or equal to 5 mrems to any organ, and b.

During any calendar year to less than or equal to 3 mrems to the whole body and to less than or equal to 10 mrems to any organ.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

With the calculated dose from the release of radioactive materials in liquid effluents exceeding any ofthe above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits. This Special Report shall also include: (1) the results of radiological analyses of the drinking water source, and (2) the radiological impact on finished drinking water supplies with regard to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 141, Clean Drinking Water Act.*

16.11.1.2.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (ODCM 9.4.2)

Cumulative dose contributions from liquid effluents for the current calendar quarter and the current calendar year shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM at least once per 31 days.

16.11.1.2.2 BASES This section is provided to implement the requirements of Sections Il.A and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The Limiting Condition for Operation implements the guides set forth in Section ll.A ofAppendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required The requirements ofACTION a.(1) and (2) are applicable only if drinking water supply is taken from the receiving water body within 3 miles of the plant discharge. In the case of river-sited plants this is 3 miles downstream only.

16.1 1-3 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY - SP operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be kept as low as is reasonably achievable.

Also, for fresh water sites with drinking water supplies that can be potentially affected by plant operations, there is reasonable assurance that the operation of the facility will not result in radionuclide concentrations in the finished drinking water that are in excess of the requirements of4O CFR Part 141. The dose calculation methodology and parameters in the ODCM implement the requirements in Section lll.A ofAppendix I which specify that conformance with the guides ofAppendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data, such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The equations specified in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive materials in liquid effluents are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, Calculations ofAnnual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I, Revision I

, October 1 977 and Regulatory Guide I

. 11 3, Estimating Aquatic and Dispersion of Effluents from accidental and Routine Reactor Releases for the Purpose of Implementing Appendix I, April 1977.

The reporting requirements ofAction(a) implement the requirements of IOCFR2O.2203.

16.11-4 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY - SP 16.11.1.3 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION (ODCM 9.1.1)

The radioactive Iiqud effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 16.11-2 shall be FUNCTIONAL with theirAlarm/Trip Setpoints set to ensure that the limits of Section 16. 11

. I

. I are not exceeded. The Alarm/Trip Setpoints of these channels shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

a.

With a radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel Alarm/Trip Setpoint less conservative than required by the above, immediately suspend the release of radioactive liquid effluents monitored by the affected channel, or declare the channel non-functional.

b.

With less than the minimum number of radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels FUNCTIONAL, take theACTION shown in Table 16.11-

2. Restore the non-functional instrumentation to FUNCTIONAL status within 30 days and, if unsuccessful, explain in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report, pursuant to Technical Specification 5.6.3, why this non-functionality was not corrected within the time specified.

16.11.1.3.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (ODCM 9.1.2)

Each radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated FUNCTIONAL by performance ofthe CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION and CHANNEL OPERATIONAL TEST at the frequencies shown in Table 16.11-3.

16.11.1.3.2 BASES The radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents during actual or potential releases of liquid effluents. The Alarm/Trip Setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM to ensure that the alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR Part 20. The FUNCTIONALITY and use of this instrumentation is consistentwith the requirements ofGeneral Design Criteria 60, 63, and 64 ofAppendixA to 10 CFR Part 50.

16.11-5 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY - SP 16.11.1.4 LIQUID RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION (ODCM 9.5.1)

The Liquid Radwaste Treatment System shall be FUNCTIONAL and appropriate portions of the system shall be used to reduce releases of radioactivity when the projected doses due to the liquid effluent, from each unit, to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see Figure 16.11-1) would exceed 0.06 mrem to the whole body or 0.2 mrem to any organ in a 31 day period.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

With radioactive liquid waste being discharged in excess of the above limits and the Liquid Radwaste Treatment Systems are not being fully utilized, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days a Special Report that includes the following information:

1)

Explanation ofwhy liquid radwaste was being discharged without treatment, identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability.

2)

Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and 3)

Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.

16.11.1.4.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (ODCM 9.5.2) 16.11.1.4.1.a Doses due to liquid releases from each unit to UNRESTRICTED AREAS shall be projected at least once per 31 days in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.

16.11.1.4.1.b The installed Liquid Radwaste Treatment System shall be considered FUNCTIONAL by meeting Sections 1 6. 1 1

. I

. I and I 6. 1 1

. I.2.

16.11.1.4.2 BASES The FUNCTIONALITY of the Liquid Radwaste Treatment System ensures that this system will be available for use whenever liquid effluents require treatment prior to 16.11-6 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

I CALLAWAY

- SP release to the environment. The requirement that the appropriate portions of this system be used when specified provides assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents will be kept as low as is reasonably achievable. This section implements the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50.36a, General Design Criterion 60 of AppendixAto 10 CFR Part 50 and the design objective given in Section ll.D of Appendix I to I 0 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the Liquid Radwaste Treatment System were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives setforth in Section ll.AofAppendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, for liquid effluents.

16.1 1-7 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY

- SP 16.11 :1.5 LIQUID HOLDUP TANKS LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION The quantity of radioactive materaI contained in each of the following unprotected outdoor tanks shall be limited to less than or equal to 150 Curies, excluding tritium and dissolved or entrained noble gases:

a.

Reactor Makeup Water Storage Tank, b.

Refueling Water Storage Tank, c.

Condensate Storage Tank, and d.

Outside temporary tanks, excluding demineralizer vessels and the liner being used to solidify radioactive waste.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

With the quantity of radioactive material in any of the above listed tanks exceeding the above limit, immediately suspend all additions of radioactive material to the tank, within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months reduce the tank contents to within the limit, and describe the events leading to this condition in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report, pursuant to Technical Specification 5.6.3.

e.

16.11.1.5.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (4.11.1.4)

The quantity of radioactive material contained in each of the above listed tanks shall be determined to be within the above limit by analyzing a representative sample of the tanks contents at least once per 7 days when radioactive materials are being added and within 7 days following any addition of radioactive material to the tank. The provisions of Sections 16.0.2.2 and 16.0.2.3 are applicable, howeverthe allowed surveillance interval extension beyond 25% shall not be exceeded. These tanks are also covered by Administrative Controls Section 5.5. 1 2 of the plant Technical Specifications.

16.11.1.5.2 BASES The tanks listed above include all those outdoor radwaste tanks that are not surrounded by liners, dikes, or walls capable of holding the tank contents and that do not have tank overflows and surrounding area drains connected to the Liquid Radwaste Treatment System.

16.11-8 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY - SP Restricting the quantity of radioactive material contained in the specified tanks provides assurance that in the event of an uncontrolled release of the tanks contents, the resulting concentrations would be less than the limits of 10 CFR Part 2O.1-2O6O2, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2, (redesignated at 56FR23391, May 21, 1991) at the nearest potable water supply and the nearest surface water supply in an UNRESTRICTED AREA.

16.1 1-9 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY - SP 16.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 1611.2.1 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS DOSE RATE LIMITING CONDITION OF OPERATION (ODCM 9.6.1)

The dose rate due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 16.11-2) shall be limited to the following:

a.

For noble gases: Less than or equal to 500 mrems/yr to the whole body and less than or equal to 3000 mrems/yr to the skin, and b.

For lodine-131 and 133, for tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days: Less than or equal to I 500 mrems/yr to any organ.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

With the dose rate(s) exceeding the above limits, immediately restore the release rate to within the above limit(s).

I 6. 11.2. 1

. I SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (ODCM 9.6.2) 16.11.2.1.1.a The dose rate due to noble gases in gaseous effluents shall be determined to be within the above limits in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.

16.11.2.1.1.b The dose rate due to Iodine-131 and 133, tritium and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents shall be determined to be within the above limits in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM by obtaining representative samples and performing analyses in accordance with the sampling and analysis program specified in Table 16.11-4.

16.11.2.1.2 BASES This section is provided to ensure that the dose at any time at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY from gaseous effluents from all units on the site will be within the annual dose limits of 10 CFR Part 20 to UNRESTRICTEDAREAS. The dose rate limits are the 16.11-10 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY - SP doses associated with the concentrations of I 0 CFR Part 20.1-20.601, Appendix B, Table II, Column I

. These limits provide reasonable assurance that radioactive material discharged in gaseous effluents will not result in the exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC in an UNRESTRICTED AREA, either within or outside the SITE BOUNDARY, to annual average concentrations exceeding the dose limits specified in 10 CFR Part 20 I 0 CFR 20. 1 301 For MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC who may at times be within the SITE BOUNDARY, the occupancy of that MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC will usually be sufficiently low to compensate for any increase in the atmospheric diffusion factor above that for the SITE BOUNDARY. Examples of calculations for such MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, with the appropriate occupancy factors, shall be given in the ODCM. The specified release rate limits restrict, at all times, the corresponding gamma and beta dose rates above background to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY to less than or equal to 500 mrem/year to the whole body or to less than or equal to 3000 mrems/year to the skin. These release rate limits also restrict, at all times, the corresponding thyroid dose rate above background to a child via the inhalation pathway to less than or equal to I 500 mrems/year.

The required detection capabilities for radioactive materials in gaseous waste samples are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs).

The requirement for additional sampling of the Unit Vent following a reactor power transient is provided to ensure that the licensee is aware of and properly accounts for any increases in the release of gaseous effluents due to spiking which may occur as a result of the power transient. Monitoring the Unit Vent for increased noble gas activity is appropriate because it is the release point for any increased activity which may result from the power transient.

Since the escape rate coefficients for the noble gas nuclides is equal to or greater than the escape rate coefficient for iodine and the particulate nuclides*,**

, it is reasonable to assume that the RCS spiking behavior of the noble gas nuclides is similar to that of the particulate and iodine nuclides. Considering the effects of iodine and particulate partitioning, plateout on plant and ventilation system surfaces, and the 99% efficiency of the Unit Vent HEPA filters and charcoal absorbers, it is reasonable to assume that the relative concentrations of the noble gas nuclides will be much greater than those of the iodine and particulate nuclides. Therefore, an increase in the iodine and particulate RCS activity is not an appropriate indicator of an increase in the Unit Vent activity, and it is appropriate to monitor the Unit Vent effluent activity as opposed to the RCS activity as an indicator of the need to perform post-transient sampling. In addition, it is appropriate to monitor the noble gas activity due to its relatively greater concentration in the Unit Vent.

Cohen, Paul, Water Coolant Technology of Power Reactors, Table 5. 1 9, page 1 98. American Nuclear Society. 1980.

NUREG-0772, Technical Bases for Estimating Fission Product Behavior During LWR Accidents, Silberberg, M., editor, USNRC; Figure4.3, page4.22. June, 1981.

16.11-11 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY - SP 16112.2 DOSE

- NOBLE GASES LIMITING CONDITION OF OPERATION (ODCM 9.7.1)

The air dose due to noble gases released in gaseous effluents, from each unit, to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 16.11-2) shall be limited to the following:

During any calendar quarter:

Less than or equal to 5 mrads for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 10 mrads for beta radiation, and During any calendar year: Less than or equal to I 0 mrads for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 20 mrads for beta radiation.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

With the calculated air dose from radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.

16.11.2.2.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (ODCM 9.7.2)

Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year for noble gases shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM at least once per 31 days.

16.11.2.2.2 BASES This section is provided to implementthe requirements of Sections Il.B, lIlA, and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The Limiting Condition for Operation implements the guides set forth in Section ll.B ofAppendix I. The ACTION statement provides the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in gaseous effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be kept as low as is reasonably achievable.

The Surveillance Requirements implement the requirements in Section lll.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides ofAppendix 1 be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated.

The dose calculation methodology and parameters established in the ODCM for 16.11-12 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY - SP calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, Calculation ofAnnual Doses to Man from Routine Releases on Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with I 0 CFR Part 50, Appendix I, Revision I, October 1 977 and Regulatory Guide I

. 111, Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water Cooled Reactors, Revision 1, July 1977. The ODCM equations provided for determining the air doses at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are based upon the historical average atmospheric conditions.

The reporting requirements ofAction(a) implementthe requirements of IOCFR2O.2203.

16.11-13 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY - SP 16.11.2.3 DOSE

- IODINE-131 AND 133, TRITIUM, AND RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL IN PARTICULATE FORM LIMITING CONDITION OF OPERATION (ODCM 9.8.1)

The dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from Iodine-131 and 133, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released, from each unit, to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 16.11-2) shall be limited to the following:

a.

During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 7.5 mrems to any organ, and b.

During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 15 mrems to any organ.

APPLICABILITY:

At all times.

ACTION:

With the calculated dose from the release of lodine-131 and 133, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents exceeding any ofthe above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limits and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.

I 6.11.2.3. 1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (ODCM 9.8.2)

Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year for Iodine-131 and 133, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM at least once per 31 days.

16.11.2.3.2 BASES This section is provided to implement the requirements of Sections Il.C, lIlA, and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The Limiting Conditions for Operation are the guides set forth in Section ll.C ofAppendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the release of radioactive material in gaseous effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be kept as low as reasonably achievable. The ODCM calculational methods specified in the Surveillance Requirements implement the requirements in Section III.A ofAppendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be 16.11-14 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY - SP substantially underestimated. The ODCM calculational methodology and parameters for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of the subject materials are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide I

. I 09, Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with I 0 CFR Part 50, Appendix I, Revision I, October 1 977 and Regulatory Guide I.111

, Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water Cooled Reactors, Revision 1, July 1977. These equations also provide fordetermining the actual doses based upon the historical average atmospheric conditions. The release rate controls for Iodine-I 31, and 133, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days are dependent upon the existing radionuclide pathways to man, in the areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY. The pathways that were examined in the development of these calculations were: (I) individual inhalation of airborne radionuclides, (2) deposition of radionuclides onto green leafy vegetation with subsequent consumption by man, (3) deposition of radionuclides onto grassy areas where milk animals and meat-producing animals graze with consumption of the milk and meat by man, and (4) deposition on the ground with subsequent exposure of man.

The reporting requirements ofAction(a) implementthe requirements of IOCFR2O.2203.

16.11-15 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY

- SP 16.11.2A RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION (ODCM 9.2.1)

The radioacfive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 16.11-5 shall be FUNCTIONAL with theirAlarm/Trip Setpoints set to ensure that the limits of Section 16. 11.2.1 are not exceeded. The Alarm/Trip Setpoints of these channels meeting Section 16.11.2.1 shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.

APPLICABILITY: As shown in Table 16.11-5.

ACTION:

a.

With a radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel Alarm/Trip Setpoint less conservative than required by the above, immediately declare the channel non-functional.

b.

With less than the minimum number of radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels FUNCTIONAL, take theACTION shown in Table 16.11-

5. Restore the non-functional instrumentation to FUNCTIONAL status within the time specified in the ACTION, or explain in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report, pursuant to Technical Specification 5.6.3, why this non-functionality was not corrected within the time specified.

I 6.1 1.2.4. 1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (ODCM 9.2.2)

Each radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated FUNCTIONAL by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION and CHANNEL OPERATIONAL TEST at the frequencies shown in Table 16.11-6.

16.11.2.4.2 BASES The radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents during actual or potential releases of gaseous effluents. The Alarm/Trip Setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM to ensure that the alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR Part 20. The FUNCTIONALITY and use of this instrumentation is consistentwith the requirements ofGeneral Design Criteria 60, 63, and 64 ofAppendixA to I 0 CFR Part 50. The sensitivity of any noble gas activity monitor used to show compliance with the gaseous effluent release requirements of Section 1 6. 11.2. 1 shall be such that concentrations as low as I x 1 6 pCi/cc are measurable.

16.11-16 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY - SP The monitors GT-RE-22 and GT-RE-33 are only required for automatic containment purge isolation in MODES I through 4. For plant conditions during CORE ALTERATIONS and during movement of irradiated fuel within containment, the function of the monitors is to alarm only and the trip signals for automatic actuation of CPIS may be bypassed. Eased on the guidance provided in Regulatory Guide 1.97 concerning monitoring requirements for containment or purge effluent, the monitors GT-RE-22 and GT-RE-33 do not need to meet the single failure criterion for an Alarm function only during CORE ALTERATIONS or during movement of irradiated fuel in containment. One instrumentation channel at a minimum is required for the alarm only function during refueling activities.

In the event that the containment mini-puge supply and exhaust valves have been closed to satisfy Action 41 of Table I 6.11-5 due to non-functionality of GTREOO22 and/or GTREOO33, an allowance is provided in Action 41 to open the containment mini-purge supply and exhaust valves under administrative controls for the purpose of equalizing containment pressure. The administrative controls consist of designating a control room operator to rapidly close the valves when a need for system isolation is indicated.

16.11-17 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY

- SP 16.11.2.5 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION OF OPERATION (ODCM 9.9.1)

The VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM and the WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM shall be FUNCTIONAL and appropriate portions ofthese systems shall be used to reduce releases of radioactivity when the projected doses in 31 days due to gaseous effluent releases, from each unit, to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 1 6.11-2) would exceed:

a.

0.2 mrad to air from gamma radiation, or b.

0.4 mrad to air from beta radiation, or c.

0.3 mrem to any organ of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC.

APPLICABILITY: At all times ACTION:

With radioactive gaseous waste being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days a Special Report that includes the following information:

1)

Identification of any non-functional equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the non-functionality, 2)

Action(s) taken to restore the non-functional equipment to FUNCTIONAL status, and 3)

Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.

1 6. 11.2.5.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (ODCM 9.9.2) 16.11.2.5.1.a Doses due to gaseous releases to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY shall be projected at least once per 31 days in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.

16.11.2.5.1.b 16.11-18 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY - SP The installed VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM and the WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEMS shall be considered FUNCTIONAL by meeting Sections 16.11.2.1 and 16.11.2.2 or 16.11.2.3.

16.11.2.5.2 BASES The FUNCTIONALITY of the WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM and the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM ensures that the system will be available for use whenever gaseous effluents require treatment prior to release to the environment. The requirement that the appropriate portions of these systems be used, when specified, provides reasonable assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents will be kept as low as is reasonably achievable. This control implements the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50.36a, General Design Criterion 60 ofAppendixAto 10 CFR Part 50, and the design objectives given in Section ll.D ofAppendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the systems were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives set forth in Sections ll.B and ll.C ofAppendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, for gaseous effluents.

16.11-19 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY - SP 16.11.2.6 EXPLOSIVE GAS MIXTURE LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION The concentration of oxygen in the WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM shall be limited to less than or equal to 3% by volume whenever the hydrogen concentration exceeds 4%

by volume.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

a.

With the concentration of oxygen in the WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM greater than 3% by volume but less than or equal to 4% by volume, reduce the oxygen concentration to the above limit within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months .

b.

With the concentration of oxygen in the WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM greater than 4% by volume and the hydrogen concentration greater than 4% by volume, immediately suspend all additions of waste gases to the system and reduce the concentration on oxygen to less than or equal to 4% by volume, then take ACTION a. above.

16.11.2.6.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS The concentrations of hydrogen and oxygen in the WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM shall be determined to be within the above limits by continuously monitoring the waste gases in the WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM with the hydrogen and oxygen monitors required FUNCTIONAL by Section 16.11.2.7. This system is covered by Technical Specification 5.5.12 which governs surveillance test frequencies and missed surveillances.

16.11.2.6.2 BASES This Requirement is provided to ensure that the concentration of potentially explosive gas mixtures contained in the WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM is maintained below the flammability limits of hydrogen and oxygen. Automatic control features are included in the system to prevent the hydrogen and oxygen concentrations from reaching these flammability limits. These automatic control features include isolation of the source of hydrogen and/or oxygen. Maintaining the concentration of hydrogen and oxygen below their flammability limits provides assurance that the releases of radioactive materials will be controlled in conformance with the requirements of General Design Criterion 60 of AppendixAto 10 CFR Part 50.

16.11-20 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY - SP 16.11.2.7 WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM RECOMBINER EXPLOSIVE GAS MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION At least one hydrogen and both the nIet and outlet oxygen explosive gas monitoring instrument channels for each WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM recombiner shall be FUNCTIONAL with theirAlarm/Trip Setpoints (with the exception of the FEED H2 4%!

FEED 02 3% and FEED H2 4%!FEED 02 4% alarms) set to ensure that the limits of Section 16.11.2.6 are not exceeded.

APPLICABILITY: During WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM operation.

ACTION:

a.

With an outlet oxygen monitor channel non-functional, operation of the system may continue provided grab samples are taken and analyzed at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months .

b.

With both oxygen or both hydrogen channels or both the inlet oxygen and inlet hydrogen monitor channels for one recombiner non-functional, suspend oxygen supply to the recombiner. Addition of waste gas to the system may continue provided grab samples are taken and analyzed at least: I ) once per 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months during mechanical or chemical degassing in preparation for plant shutdown, and

2) once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months during other operations.

c.

With the inlet oxygen analyzer non-functional, operation of the system may continue provided the inlet hydrogen is maintained less than 4%. If inlet hydrogen is greater than 4%, suspend oxygen to the recombiner. Addition of waste gas to the system may continue provided grab samples are taken and analyzed at least:

I ) once per 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months during mechanical or chemical degassing operations in preparation for plant shutdown, and 2) once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months during other operations.

16.11.2.7.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS This system is covered by Technical Specification 5.5.12 which governs surveillance test frequencies and missed surveillances.

Each waste gas holdup system recombiner explosive gas monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated FUNCTIONAL by performance of:

a.

A CHANNEL CHECK at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months , b.

Not used 16.1 1-21 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY

- SP C.

A CHANNEL CALIBRATION at least once per 92 days with the use of standard gas samples containing a nominal:

1)

One volume percent hydrogen, balance nitrogen and four volume percent hydrogen, balance nitrogen for the hydrogen monitor, and 2)

One volume percent oxygen, balance nitrogen, and four volume percent oxygen, balance nitrogen for the inlet oxygen monitor, and 3) 10 ppm by volume oxygen, balance nitrogen and 80 ppm by volume oxygen, balance nitrogen for the outlet oxygen monitor.

16.11.2.7.2 BASES Mechanical degassing operation is defined as the transfer of gas from the Volume Control Tank (VCT) to the Waste Gas Holdup System when establishing a nitrogen blanket on the VCT in preparation for a plant shutdown. Chemical degassing operation is the process of adding hydrogen peroxide to the RCS after the VCT hydrogen blanket has been replaced with nitrogen per the mechanical degassification process and the RCS has been reduced to less than 180°F. Both mechanical and chemical degassification may lead to an explosive gas mixture in the Waste Gas Holdup System, thus requiring the more restrictive 4-hour sampling. Other operations require 24-hour sampling.

The FEED H2 4%/FEED 02 3% AND FEED H2 4%/FEED 02 4% alarms are not required to be FUNCTIONAL. These alarms result from the combination of inlet hydrogen and inlet oxygen analyzer outputs while the FSAR only addresses FUNCTIONALITY of each separate analyzer. Only the individual alarms and control functions associated with each analyzer are to be used to determine its functionality.

These alarms and control functions are sufficient to ensure that the limits of Section 16.11.2.6 are not exceeded.

The CHANNEL CALIBRATION includes triggering the following alarms at the analyzer and verifying that the required control board annunciators and control functions actuate:

1)

Feed Gas High H2 2)

HARC-1 I 04 OAIC-1 I I 2 Hi Hi H2/O2 02 Shutdown 3)

H2 Reactor High Oxygen 02 Limit 4)

Product Gas High H2 5)

Product Gas High Oxygen 16.11-22 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY

- SP 6)

Product Gas Hi Hi °2 Shutdown This surveillance verifies the FUNCTIONALITY of the analyzers output relays, all interposing relays, and the annunciators. Setpoint verification consists of verifying that the correct setpoint values are entered in the analyzers database.

16.11-23 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY

- SP 16.11.Z8 GAS STORAGE TANKS LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION The quantity of radioactivity contained in each gas storage tank shall be limited to less than or equal to 2.5 x Io Curies of noble gases (considered as Xe-I 33 equivalent).

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

With the quantity of radioactive material in any gas storage tank exceeding the above limit, immediately suspend all additions of radioactive material to the tank and, within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months , reduce the tank contents to within the limit, and describe the events leading to this condition in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report, pursuant to Technical Specification 5.6.3.

I 6. II.2.8. I SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS The provisions of Sections 16.0.2.2 and 16.0.2.3 are applicable, however the allowed surveillance interval extension beyond 25% shall not be exceeded. This system is also covered byAdministrative Controls Section 5.5.12 ofthe plantTechnical Specifications.

The quantity of radioactive material contained in each gas storage tank shall be determined to be within the above limit at least once per I 8 months.

16.11.2.8.2 BASES The tanks included in this Requirement are those tanks for which the quantity of radioactivity contained is not limited directly or indirectly by another Requirement.

Restricting the quantity of radioactivity contained in each gas storage tank provides assurance that in the event of an uncontrolled release of the tanks contents, the resulting whole body exposure to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC at the nearest SITE BOUNDARYwiII notexceed 0.5 rem. This is consistentwith Standard Review Plan 11.3, Branch Technical Position ETSB 11-5, Postulated Radioactive Releases Due to a Waste Gas System Leak or Failure, in NUREG-0800, July 1981. The determination of Xe-133 equivalent uses the effective dose conversion factors for air submersion listed in Table 111.1 of EPA Federal Guidance Report No. 12, EPA-402-R-93-08I, External Exposure to Radionuclides inAir, Water, and Soil, 1993.

I 6. 1 1 -24 Rev. OL-26b 4/23 I

CALLAWAY

- SP I 6. 1 1.3 TOTAL DOSE 16.11.3.1 TOTAL DOSE LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION (ODCM 9.10.1)

The annual (calendar year) dose or dose commftmentto any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC due to releases of radioactivity and to radiation from uranium fuel cycle sources shall be limited to less than or equal to 25 mrems to the whole body or any organ, except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrem.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

With the calculated doses from the release of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents exceeding twice the limits of Section 1 6. 1 1.2.2a, I 6. 1 1.2.2b, I 6. 1 1.23a, or I 6. 1 1.23b, calculations should be made including direct radiation contributions from the units and from outside storage tanks to determine whether the above limits of Section 16.11.3.1 have been exceeded.

If such is the case, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days a Special Report that defines the corrective action to be taken to reduce subsequent release to prevent recurrence of exceeding the above limits and includes the schedule for achieving conformance with the above limits. This Special Report, as defined in 10 CFR 20.2203, shall include an analysis that estimates the radiation exposure (dose) to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from uranium fuel cycle sources, including all effluent pathways and direct radiation, for the calendar year that includes the release(s) covered by this report.

It shall also describe levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive material involved, and the cause of the exposure levels or concentrations. Ifthe estimated dose(s) exceeds the above limits, and ifthe release condition resulting in violation of4O CFR Part 190 has not already been corrected, the Special Report shall include a request for a variance in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 190. Submittal ofthe report is considered a timely request, and a variance is granted until staff action on the request is complete.

16.11.3.1.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (ODCM 9.10.2) 16.11.3.1.1.a Cumulative dose contributions from gaseous effluents shall be determined in accordance with Sections 16.11.2.2.1, and 16.11.2.3.1, and in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.

16.11.3.1.1.b 16.11-25 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY - SP Cumulative dose contributions from direct radiation from the units and from radwaste storage tanks shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM. This requirements is applicable only under conditions set forth in ACTION

a. ofSection 16.11.3.1.

16.11.3.1.2 BASES This Requirement is provided to meet the dose limitations of 40 CFR Part I 90 that have been incorporated into I 0 CFR Part 20. 1 301. The control requires the preparation and submittal of a Special Report whenever the calculated doses due to releases of radioactivity and the radiation from uranium fuel cycle sources exceed 25 mrems to the whole body or any organ except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrems. For sites containing up to four reactors, it is highly unlikely that the resultant dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC will exceed the dose limits of 40 CFR Part 190 ifthe individual reactors remain within twice the dose design objectives of Appendix I, and if direct radiation doses from the reactor units and from outside storage tanks are kept small. The Special Report will describe a course of action that should result in the limitation of the annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC to within the 40 CFR Part 190 limits.

For the purposes of the Special Report, it may be assumed that the dose commitment to the MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from other uranium fuel cycle sources is negligible, with the exception that dose contributions from other nuclear fuel cycle facilities at the same site or within a radius of 8 km must be considered. If the dose to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is estimated to exceed the requirements of4O CFR Part 190, the Special Report with a request for a variance (provided the release conditions resulting in violation of 40 CFR Part 190 have not already been corrected), in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 190.11 and 10 CFR 20.2203, is considered to be a timely request and fulfills the requirements of 40 CFR Part I 90 until NRC staff action is completed. The variance only relates to 40 CFR Part I 90, and does not apply in any way to the other requirements for dose limitation of I 0 CFR Part 20, as addressed in Sections 16.11.1.1 and 16.11.2.1.

An individual is not considered a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC during any period in which he/she is engaged in carrying out any operation that is part of the nuclear fuel cycle.

There are three defined effluent release categories: I.) Releases directly to the hydrosphere; 2.) noble gas releases to the atmosphere; 3.) radioiodine and particulate releases to the atmosphere. For each effluent release category, it is assumed in the dose calculations that an individual with the highest dose potential is the receptor.

In general, the adult is considered to be the critical age group for liquid effluents, and the child age group is the most limiting for radioiodine and particulates in gaseous effluents.

Thus, it is highly unlikely or impossible for the same individual to simultaneously receive the highest dose via all three effluent categories. For most reactor sites, it is also unlikely that all different potential dose pathways would contribute to the dose to a single real individual. Since it is difficult or impossible to continually determine actual food use patterns and critical age group, for calculational purposes, assumptions are made which tend to maximize doses. Any refinement in the assumptions would have the effect of 16.1 1-26 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY - SP reducing the estimated dose. For radionuclides released to the hydrosphere, the degree of overestimation in most situations is such that no individual will receive a significant dose. These conservative assumptions generally result in an overestimation of dose by one or two orders of magnitude. Since these assumptions are reflected in the Radiological Effluent Controls limiting radionuclide releases to design objective individual doses, no offsite individual is likely to actually receive a significant dose. Since the doses from liquid releases are very conservatively evaluated, there is reasonable assurance that no real individual will receive a significant dose from radioactive liquid release pathway. Therefore, only doses to individuals via airborne pathways and dose resulting from direct radiation need to be considered in determining potential compliance to 40 CFR 190*.

The reporting requirements ofAction(a) implementthe requirements of IOCFR2O.2203.

NUREG-0543, Methods for Demonstrating LWR compliance with the EPA Uranium Fuel Cycle Standard (40 CFR 190), Congel, F. J., Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, USNRC. January, 1980.

pp. 5-8.

16.11-27 Rev. OL-26b 4/23 I

CALLAWAY - SP 16.11.4 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 16.11.4.1 MONITORING PROGRAM LIMITING CONDITION OF OPERATION (ODCM 9.11.1)

The Radbloglcal Environmental Monitoring Program shall be conducted as specified in Table 16.11-f.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

a.

With the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program not being conducted as specified in Table 16.11-f, prepare and submitto the Commission, in theAnnual Radiological Environmental Operating Report required by Technical Specification 5.6.2, a description ofthe reasons for not conducting the program as required and the plans for preventing a recurrence.

b.

With the level of radioactivity as the result of plant effluents in an environmental sampling medium at a specified location exceeding the reporting levels of Table 16.11-8 when averaged over any calendar quarter, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions to be taken to reduce radioactive effluents so that the potential annual dose* to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is less than the calendar year limits of Sections 16.11.1.2, 16.11.2.2, or I 6.11.2.3. When more than one ofthe radionuclides in Table 16.11-8 are detected in the sampling medium, this report shall be submitted if:

concentration (1) concentration (2) reporting level (1) reporting (2)

When radionuclides otherthan those in Table 16.11-8 are detected and are the result of plant effluents, this report shall be submitted if the potential annual dose*

to A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from all radionuclides is equal to or greater than the calendar year limits of Sections 16.11.1.2, 16.11.2.2 or 16.11.2.3. This report is not required if the measured level of radioactivity was not the result of plant effluents; however, in such an event, the condition shall be reported and described in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, required by Technical Specification 5.6.2.

c.

With milk or fresh leafy vegetable samples unavailable from one or more of the sample locations required by Table 16.11-f, identify specific locations for The methodology and parameters used to estimate the potential annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC shall be indicated in this report.

16.11-28 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY

- SP obtaining replacement samples and add them within 30 days to the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program*. The specific locations from which samples were unavailable may then be deleted from the monitoring program.

In the next Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report include the revised figure(s) and tables reflecting the new sample location(s) with supporting information identifying the cause of the unavailability of samples and justifying the selection of new location(s) for obtaining samples.

d.

When LLDs specified in Table 16.11-9 are unachievable due to uncontrollable circumstances such as background fluctuations, unavailable small sample sizes, the presence of interfering nuclides, etc., the contributing factors shall be identified and described in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report.

I 6. 11.4. 1

. I SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (ODCM 9.11.2)

The radiological environmental monitoring samples shall be collected pursuant to Table I 6. 11 -7 and shall be analyzed pursuant to the requirements of Table I 6.11 -7 and the detection capabilities required by Table 16.11-9.

16.11.4.1.2 BASES The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program provides representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides that lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC resulting from the station operation. This monitoring program implements Section lV.B.2 ofAppendix I to 10 CFR Part 50 and thereby supplements the Radiological Effluent Monitoring Program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways. Guidance for the initial monitoring program was provided by the Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on Environmental Monitoring, Revision 1, November 1979.

The required detection capabilities for environmental sample analyses are tabulated in terms ofthe lower limits ofdetection (LLDs). The LLDs required by Table 16.11-9 are considered optimum for routine environmental measurements in industrial laboratories.

Excluding short term or temporary unavailability.

16.11-29 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY - SP 16.11.4.2 LAND USE CENSUS LIMITING CONDITION OF OPERATION (ODCM 9.12.1)

A Land Use Census shall be conducted and shall identify within a distance of 8 km (5 miles) the location in each ofthe 16 meteorological sectors ofthe nearest milk animal, the nearest residence and the nearest garden* of greater than 50 m2 (500 ft2) producing broad leaf vegetation. The Land Use Census shall identify water intakes constructed within I 0 river miles downstream of the plant discharge point.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

a.

With a Land Use Census identifying a location(s) that yields a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated by Section I 6. 11.2.3. 1, identify the new location(s) in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report, pursuant to Technical Specification 5.6.3.

b.

With a Land Use Census identifying a location(s) that yields a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20% greater than at a location from which samples are currently being obtained in accordance with Section 16.11.4.1, add the new location(s) within 30 days to the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program except for vegetation samples which shall be added to the program before the next growing season. The sampling location(s),

excluding the control station location, having the lowest calculated dose or dose commitment(s), via the same exposure pathway, may be deleted from this monitoring program after October 31 of the year in which this Land Use Census was conducted.

In the nextAnnual Radiological Environmental Operating Report include the revised figure(s) and tables reflecting the new sample location(s) with information supporting the change in sample location.

c.

With a Land Use Census identifying a water intake within 10 river miles downstream of the plant discharge point, implement the appropriate waterborne or ingestion sampling required by Table 16.11-7.

Broad leaf vegetation sampling of at least three different kinds of vegetation may be performed at the SITE BOUNDARY in each to two different direction sectors with the highest predicted DIQs in lieu of the garden census. Requirements for broad leafvegetation sampling in Table 16.11-7, Part 4.c shall be followed, including analysis of control samples.

16.1 1-30 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY - SP I 6. 11.4.2. 1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (ODCM 9.12.2)

The Land Use Census shall be conducted during the growing season at least once per 12 months using that information which will provide the best results, such as, but not limited to, door-to-door survey, aerial survey, or by consulting local agriculture authorities and/or residents. The results of the Land Use Census shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to Technical Specification 5.6.2.

16.11.4.2.2 BASES This Requirement is provided to ensure that changes in the use of areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are identified and that modifications to the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program given in the ODCM are made if required by the results ofthis census. Information thatwill provide the best results, such as door-to-door survey, aerial survey, or consulting with local agricultural authorities, shall be used. This census satisfies the requirements of Section lV.B.3 ofAppendix I to 10 CFR Part 50.

Restricting the census to gardens of greater than 50 m2 provides assurance that significant exposure pathways via leafy vegetables will be identified and monitored since a garden of this size is the minimum required to produce the quantity (26 kg/year) of leafy vegetables assumed in Regulatory Guide I

. I 09 for consumption by a child. To determine this minimum garden size, the following assumptions were made: (1) 20% of the garden was used for growing broad leaf vegetation (i.e., similar to lettuce and cabbage), and (2) a vegetation yield of 2 kg/m2.

16.11-31 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY

- SP 16.11.4.3 1NTERLABORATORYCOMPARISON PROGRAM LIMITiNG CONDITION OF OPERATION (ODCM 9.13.1)

Analyses shall be performed on radioactive materials supplied as part of an Interlaboratory Comparison Program that has been approved by the USNRC.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

With analyses not being performed as required above, report the corrective actions taken to prevent a recurrence to the Commission in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to Technical Specification 5.6.2.

16.1 1.4.3. 1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (ODCM 9.13.2)

The Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be described in the plant procedures. A summary of the results obtained as part of the above required Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to Technical Specification 5.6.2.

16.11.4.3.2 BASES The requirement for participation in an approved Interlaboratory Comparison Program is provided to ensure that independent checks on the precision and accuracy of the measurements of radioactive material in environmental sample matrices are performed as part of the quality assurance program for environmental monitoring in order to demonstrate that the results are valid for the purpose of Section IV.B.2 ofAppendix I to 10 CFR Part 50.

1 6. 1 1 -32 Rev. OL-26b 4/23 I

CALLAWAY

- SP I 6. 1 1

.5 ADM I N ISTRATIVE CONTROLS 16.11.5.1 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (ODCM 7.1)

Routine Annual RadoIogicaI Environmental Operating Report covering the operation of the unit during the previous calendar year shall be submitted prior to May I of each year.

The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report shall include summaries, interpretations, and an analysis of trends of the results of the radiological environmental surveillance activities for the report period, including a comparison with preoperational studies, with operational controls and with previous environmental surveillance reports, and an assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment.

The reports shall include the results of Land Use Census required by Section 16.11.4.2.

It shall also include a listing of new locations for environmental monitoring identified by the Land Use Census pursuant to Section 16.11.4.2.

The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report shall include the results of analysis of all radiological environmental samples and of all environmental radiation measurements taken during the period pursuant to Section 1 6. 1 1.4. 1, as well as summarized tabulated results of these analyses and measurements in the format of the table in the Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision I, November 1979. In the eventthat some individual results are not available for inclusion with the report, the report shall be submitted noting and explaining the reasons for the missing results. The missing data shall be submitted as soon as possible in a supplementary report. The reports shall also include the following: a summary description of the radiological environmental monitoring program; at least two legible maps* covering all sampling locations keyed to a table giving distances and directions from the midpoint between the two reactors; the results of licensee participation in the Interlaboratory Comparison Program and the corrective action being taken if the specified program is not being performed as required by Section 16.11.4.3; reasons for not conducting the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program as required by Section 16.11.4.1 and discussion of all deviations from the sampling schedule of Table I 6. 11 -7, discussion of environmental sample measurements that exceed the reporting levels of Table 1 6. 11 -8, but are not the result of the plant effluents, pursuant to Section 1 6. 11.4. 1 ; and discussion of all analyses in which the LLD required by Table 16.11-9 was not achievable.

16.11.5.1.1 BASES The reporting requirement for the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report is provided to ensure compliance with Technical Specification 5.6.2. This requirement was relocated from the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual to FSAR Chapter 16.

One map shall cover stations near the SITE BOUNDARY; a second shall include the more distant stations.

16.1 1-33 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY - SP 16.11.5.2 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT (ODCM 7.2)

Routine Radioactive Effluent Release Reports covering the operation of the unit during the previous calendar year shall be submitted prior to May I of each year.

The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include a summary of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents released from the unit as outlined in Regulatory Guide I.21, Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity in Solid Wastes and Releases Gaseous Effluents from Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants, Revision 1, June 1974, with data summarized on a quarterly basis in a format acceptable to the NRC.

The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include an annual summary of hourly meteorological data collected over the previous calender year. This annual summary may be either in the form of an hour-by-hour listing on magnetic tape ofwind speed, wind direction, atmospheric stability, and precipitation (if measured), or in the form of joint frequency distribution ofwind speed, wind direction, and atmospheric stability*.

This report shall also include an assessment of the radiation doses due to the radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents released from the unit during the previous calendar year.

This report shall also include an assessment of the radiation doses from radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC due to their activities inside the SITE BOUNDARY (Figures 16.11-1 and 16.11-2) during the report period using historical average atmospheric conditions. All assumptions used in making these assessments, i.e., specific activity, exposure time and location, shall be included in these reports. The meteorological conditions concurrent with the time of release of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents, as determined by sampling frequency and measurement, shall be used for determining the gaseous pathway doses. Assessment of radiation doses shall be performed in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM).

The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include an assessment of radiation doses to the most likely exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from reactor releases and other nearby uranium fuel cycle sources, including doses from primary effluent pathways and direct radiation, for the previous calendar year to show conformance with 40 CFR Part 190, Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Nuclear Power Operation.

Doses to the MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC shall be calculated using the methodology and parameters of the ODCM.

In lieu of submission with the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report, Union Electric has the option of retaining this summary of required meteorological data on site in a file that shall be provided to the NRC upon request.

I 6. 1 1 -34 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY - SP As required by 10 CFR 72.44(d)(3), an annual report shall be submitted to the Commission in accordance with I 0 CFR 72.4, specifying the quantity of each of the principal radionuclides released to the environment in liquid and in gaseous effluents during the previous I 2 months of operation. The report must be submitted within 60 days after the end of the I 2-month monitoring period.

The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include a list and description of unplanned releases from the site to UNRESTRICTED AREAS of radioactive materials in gaseous and liquid effluents made during the reporting period.

The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include a summary description of any major changes made during the year to any Liquid or Gaseous Treatment Systems, pursuant to Offsite Dose Calculation Manual.

It shall also include a listing of new locations for dose calculations identified by the Land Use Census pursuant to Section 16.11.4.2.

Reporting requirements for changes to Solid Waste Treatment Systems are addressed in APA-ZZ-01011, PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP).

The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall also include the following information: An explanation as to why the liquid or gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation was not restored to service within the time specified, and a description of the events leading the liquid holdup tanks or gas storage tanks exceeding the limits of Section 1 6.11

. I.5 or 16.11.2.8.

The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include as part of or submitted concurrent with, a complete and legible copy of all revisions of the ODCM that occurred during the year pursuant to Technical Specification 5.5.1.

Solid Waste reporting is addressed in APA-ZZ-01 01 1, PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP).

16.11.5.2.1 BASES The reporting requirement for the Radioactive Effluent Release Report is provided to ensure compliance with Technical Specification 5.6.3. This requirement was relocated from the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual implementing procedure to FSAR Chapter 16.

In addition to the above reporting requirement, an annual report shall also be submitted in compliance with the HI-STORM UMAX Certificate of Compliance (C0C), Appendix A, Section 5.1 16.1 1-35 Rev. OL-26b 4/23

CALLAWAY

- SP TABLE 16.11-1 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM I

. Discharge Monitor Tanks (Batch Release) (2)

SAMPLING FREQUENCY(7)

TYPE OF LLD (1)

MINIMUM ANALYSIS ACTIVITY (iiCiImI)

FREQUENCY ANALYSIS Prior to Each Batch Prior to Each Batch rincipal Gamma Emitters (3) 5E-7

-131 IE-6

)issolved and Entrained I E-5 3ases (Gamma Emitters) 3 1 E-5 Monthly Composite (4) ross Alpha I E-7 Quarterly Composite (4) r-89, Sr-90 5E-8 Fe-55 I E-6 Ji-63 5E-8 Jp-237 5E-9 u-238 5E-9 u-239/240 5E-9 u-241 5E-7 m-241 5E-9 m-242 5E-9 m-243/244 5E-9 TABLE NOTATIONS (1) The LLD is defined, for purposes ofthese Requirements, as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count, above system background, that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a real signal.

For a particular measurement system, which may include radiochemical separation:

LLD =

4.66 Sb E x V x 2.22E6 x Y x exp(AAt)

Where:

LLD

= the a priori lower limit of detection (microCuries per unit mass or volume),

5b the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (counts per minute),

E

= the counting efficiency (counts per disintegration),

V

= the sample size (units of mass or volume),

the number of disintegrations per minute per microCurie, the fractional radiochemical yield, when applicable, the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide (sec-i), and the elapsed time between the midpoint ofthe sample collection period, and the time of counting (sec). For batch releases, z\\t=O.

Typical values of E, V, Y, and At should be used in the calculation.

It should be recognized thatthe LLD is defined as a a priori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement. Analyses shall be performed in such a manner that the stated LLDs will be achieved under routine conditions.

(2) A batch release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a discrete volume. Prior to sampling for analyses, each batch shall be isolated, and then thoroughly mixed by a method described in the ODCM to assure representative sampling.

(3) The pnncipal gamma emitters for which the LLD control applies include the following radionuclides: Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, Cs-i34, Cs-i37, Ce-i4i, and Ce-i44. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. Other gamma peaks that are identifiable, together with those ofthe above nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Radioactive Effluent Release Report pursuantto Technical Specification 5.6.3, in the format outlined in Regulatory Guide i.2i, Appendix B, Revision i

, June 1974.

2.22E6=

Y

=

tt

=

Rev. OL-25 6/21

CALLAWAY - SP TABLEIO.11-1 (8h2)

(4) Acompodle ample Is one hi which the quantity otlquld sampled Is paporboni to the quantity ofliquldwaS discharged and hwhlch Ba mSnd dumping amplayed manS Ii a apadman that Ia rapmaanadv. otthe Iqulda re!eeed. Pdorto analyale, al aamplaaan loris compoite thai be thoroughly mbcad hi ordarbrtha compoatle aamplaato b rapmaaiSffve otthe ama (5) DaISnd fl 0 Sn diaft b rapmaanldw aMaant mlaaae.

Rev. OL-25 6121

CALLAWAY - SP TABLE 16.11-2 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING I NSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS INSTRUMENT FUNCTIONAL ACTION I

Radioactivity Monitors Providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release a.

Liquid Radwaste Discharge Monitor I

31 (HB-RE-1 8) b.

DELETED 2.

Flow Rate Measurement Devices a.

Liquid Radwaste Blowdown I

34 Discharge Line (HB-FE-2017) b.

Steam Generator Blowdown I

34 Discharge Line (BM-FE-0054)

C.

Cooling Tower Blowdown and I

34 Bypass Flow Totalizer (FYDBI 01 7A) 3.

Discharge Monitoring Tanks (DMTs) Level a.

DMTA(HB-LI-2004)

I 33 b.

DMT B (HB-LI-2005)

I 33 ACTION STATEMENTS ACTION 31

- With the number of channels FUNCTIONAL less than required by the Minimum Channels FUNCTIONAL requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that prior to initiating a release:

a.

At least two independent samples are analyzed in accordance with Section 16.11.1.1.1, and b.

At least two technically qualified members of the facility staff independently verify the release rate calculations and discharge line valving.

Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.

Rev. OL-25 6/21

CALLAWAY - SP TABLE 16.11-2 (Sheet 2)

ACTION STATEMENTS ACTION 32

- DELETED ACTION 33

- With the number of channels FUNCTIONAL less than required by the Minimum Channels FUNCTIONAL requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided the volume discharged is determined by alternate means.

ACTION 34

- With the number of channels FUNCTIONAL less than required by the Minimum Channels FUNCTIONAL requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided the flow rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months during actual releases. Pump performance curves generated in place may be used to estimate flow.

Rev. OL-25 6/21

CALLAWAY - SP TABLE 16.11-3 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS CHANNEL CHANN EL SOU RCE CHANN EL OPERATIONAL INSTRUMENT CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION TEST I

Radioactivity Monftors Providing Alarm and AutomaticTermination of Release a.

Liquid Radwaste D

P R(2)

Q(1)

Discharge Monitor (HB-RE-1 8) b.

DELETED 2.

Flow Rate Measurement Devices a.

Liquid Radwaste D(3)

NA.

R NA.

Blowdown Discharge Line (HB-FE-2017) b.

DELETED c.

Cooling Tower D(3)

NA.

R NA.

Blowdown and Bypass Flow Totalizer (FYDBI 01 7A) 3.

Discharge Monitoring Tanks (DMTs) Level a.

DMTA(HB-LI-2004)

Priorto NA.

R N.A.

release (4) b.

DM1 B(HB-Ll-2005)

Prior to N.A.

R NA.

release (4)

Rev. OL-25 6/21

CALLAWAY

- SP TABLE I 6. 1 1 -3 (Sheet 2)

TABLE NOTATIONS I

. The CHANNEL OPERATIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that automatic isolaUon of this pathway and control room alarm annunciation occur as appropriate if any of the following conditions exists:

a.

Instrument indicates measured levels above the AlarmiTrip Setpoint (isolation and alarm), or

b. Circuit failure (alarm only), or c.

Instrument indicates a downscale failure (alarm only), or d.

Instrument controls not set in operate mode (alarm only).

2. The initial CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be performed using one or more of the reference (gas or liquid and solid) standards obtained from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) or using standards that have been obtained from suppliers that participate in measurement assurance activities with NIST. These standards shall permit calibrating the system over its intended range of energy, measurement range, and establish monitor response to a solid calibration source.

For subsequent CHANNEL CALIBRATION, NIST traceable standard (gas, liquid, or solid) may be used; or a gas, liquid, or solid source that has been calibrated by relating it to equipment that was previously (within 30 days) calibrated by the same geometry and type of source standard traceable to N 1ST.

3.

CHANNEL CHECK shall consist of verifying indication of flow during periods of release. CHANNEL CHECK shall be made at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months on days on which continuous, periodic, or batch releases are made.

4.

CHANNEL CHECK shall consist of verifying indication of tank level during periods of release. CHANNEL CHECK shall be made at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months on days on which continuous, periodic, or batch releases are made from the DM1.

Rev. OL-25 6/21

CALLAWAY

- SP TABLE 16.11-4 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENTS SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM I

. Waste Gas Decay Tank

2. Containment Purge or Vent SAMPLING FREQUENCY (9)

Monthly-grab sample (3)(4)

Continuous (6)

MINIMUM ANALYSIS FREQUENCY Iviul ILl II

)Jit)

Weekly (7)

3. Unit\\ nt (3)

MonthlyComposite Quarterly Composite TYPE OFM,i lvi I

T,uNMLYSIS Fnnclpal ciamma bmitters noble gas (2)

H-3(oxide)

-131 1-133 Principal Gamma Emitters-particulate nuclides only (2)

GrossAlpha Sr-89, Sr-90, Ni-63, Fe-55 LLD (1)

(pCi/mI) 1 lz-4 I E-6 JE-12 IE-lO IE-Il JE-11 JE-li

4. Radwaste I

SAMPLING FREQUENCY (9)

Montnly-gras sampie Continuous (6)

MINIMUM ANALYSIS FREQUENCY iviontniy Weekly (7)

Building Vent

DiiI Monthly Composite Quarterly Composite TYPE OF ACTIVITY ANALYSIS

!I amma zmluers noble gas (2) 1-131 1-133 Principal Gamma Emitters-particulate nuclides only (2)

Gross Alpha Sr-89, Sr-90, Ni-63, Fe-55 LLD (1)

(pCi/mI)

IE-12 IE-lO IE-Il 1E-il IE-Il

5. Laundry Decontaminati MiVIrLiIN FREQUENCY (9)

Continuous (6)

MINIMUM ANALYSIS FREQUENCY Weekly (7)

)n Facility Dryer Exhaust Monthly (10) Uomposite Quarterly (10) Composite TYPE OF ACTIVITY ANALYSIS Principal Gamma Emitters-particulate nuclides only (2)

Gross Alpha Sr-89, Sr-90, Ni-63, Fe-55 LLD (1)

(pCi/mI)

JE-il UE-11 IE-Il Rev. OL-23 6/18 SAMPLING FREQUENCY (9)

MINIMUM ANALYSIS TYPE OFACTIVITYANALYSIS LLD (1)

FREQUENCY (pCi/mI)

Prior to each release-grab Prior to each tank Principal Gamma Emitters-1 E-4 sample particulate, iodine, noble gas (2)

Continuous See footnote 8 SAMPLING FREQUENCY (9) l-rior to each release-grab sample IVIlINIlVIUlVI ANALYSIS FREQUENCY Frior to each release Continuous TYPE OFMi lvi I I MINPLIOIO See footnote 8 LLD (1)

(pCi/mI)

TIIIII?IIJdI 3dIIIIIId izmillers particulate, iodine, noble gas (2)

H-3(oxide) 1 iz-4 I E-6

CALLAWAY - SP TABLE 16.11-4 (Sheet 2)

6. Containment ILRT Depressurization (Post-test Vent)

SAMPLING FREQUENCY (9)

MINIMUM ANALYSIS TYPE OF ACTIVITYANALYSIS LLD (1)

FREQUENCY (iiCilml)

Prior to each release-grab Prior to each release Principal Gamma Emitters-1 E-4 sample particulate, iodine, noble gas (2)

H-3(oxide)

I E-6 TABLE NOTATIONS (1)

The LLD is defined, for purposes ofthese Requirements, as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count, above system background, that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a real signal.

For a particular measurement system, which may include radiochemical separation:

LLD =

4.66 Sb E x V x 2.22E6 x Y x exp(?M)

Where:

LLD

= the a priori lower limit of detection (microCuries per unit mass or volume),

5b the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (counts per minute),

E

= the counting efficiency (counts per disintegration),

V

= the sample size (units of mass or volume),

2.22E6= the number of disintegrations per minute per microCurie, Y

= the fractional radiochemical yield, when applicable,

= the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide (sec1), and It

= the elapsed time between the midpoint ofthe sample collection period, and the time of counting (sec).

Typical values of E, V, Y, and At should be used in the calculation.

It should be recognized thatthe LLD is defined as a a priori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement. Analyses shall be performed in such a manner that the stated LLDs will be achieved under routine conditions.

(2)

The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD Requirement applies include the following radionuclides: Kr-87, Kr-88, Xe-133, Xe-133m, Xe-135, and Xe-138 in noble gas releases and Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, 1-131

, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-141, and Ce-144 in iodine and particulate releases. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. Any nuclide which is identified in the sample and which is also listed in the ODCM gaseous effluents dose factor tables, shall be analyzed and reported in the Radioactive Effluent Release Report.

(3) lfthe Unit Vent noble gas monitor (GT-RE-21 B) shows thatthe effluent activity has increased (relative to the pre-transient activity) by more than a factor of 3 following a reactor shutdown, startup, or a thermal power change which exceeds 15% of the rated thermal power within a I hour period, samples shall be obtained and analyzed for noble gas, particulates and iodines.

This sampling shall continue to be performed at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months for a period of 7 days or until the Unit Vent noble gas monitor no longer indicates a factor of 3 increase in Unit Vent noble gas activity, whichever comes first.

(4)

Tritium grab samples shall be taken and analyzed at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months when the refueling canal is flooded.

(5)

Deleted.

(6)

The ratio of the sample flow rate to the sampled stream flow rate shall be known for the time period covered by each dose or dose rate calculation made in accordancewith Sections 16.11.2.1, 16.71.2.2, and 16.11.2.3.

(7)

Samples shall be changed at least once per 7 days and analyses shall be completed within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months after changing, or removal from the sampler. When sampling is performed in accordance with footnote 3 (above), then the LLD may be increased by a factor of 10.

(8)

Continuous sampling of this batch release pathway is included in the continuous sampling performed for the corresponding continuous release pathway.

(9)

Samples shall be representative of the effluent release.

(10) Required only if Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-141, or Ce-144 are detected in principle gamma emitter analyses.

Rev. OL-23 6/18

CALLAWAY - SP TABLE 16i1-5 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS FUNCTIONAL APPLICABILITY I

Atall times INSTRUMENT 1.

UnftVent System a.

Noble Gas Activity Monitor - Providing Alarm (GT-RE-21) b.

Iodine Sampler c.

Particulate Sampler d.

Unit Vent Flow Rate

e. Particulate and Radioiodine Sampler Flow Rate Monitor 2.

Containment Purge System a.

Noble Gas Activity Monitor Providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release (GT-RE-22, GT-RE-33)

Providing Alarm function only b.

Iodine Sampler

d. Containment Purge N/A Ventilation Flow Rate Atall times Atall times Atall times Atall times 43 43 45 43 MODES 1,2,3, and 41 4.

During CORE ALTERATIONS or movement of irradiated fuel within the containment MODES I 2,3,4 and during CORE ALTERATIONS or movement of irradiated fuel within the containment MODES I,2,3,4 and during CORE ALTERATIONS or movement of irradiated fuel within the containment N/A N/A Rev. OL-24 11/19 ACTION 40,46 I

I I

I 2

I 42 43 43 C.

Particulate Sampler I

CALLAWAY - SP ACTION 38 TABLE I 6. 1 1 -5 (Sheet 2)

I I

N/A I

ACTION STATEMENTS Atail times At all times N/A Atall times 43 43 N/A 43 With the number of low range channels FUNCTIONAL less than required by the Minimum Channels FUNCTIONAL requirement, the contents of the tank(s) may be released to the environment for up to 14 days provided that prior to initiating the release:

a. At least two independent samples of the tanks contents are analyzed, and

b. At least two technically qualified members of the facility staff independently verify the release rate calculations and discharge valve lineup.

Rev. OL-24 I I /19 I

I MODES I,2,3,4 and during CORE ALTERATIONS or movement of irradiated fuel within the containment At all times 43 38,40 e.

Particulate and Radioiodine Sampler Flow Rate Monitor 3.

Radwaste Building Vent System a.

Noble Gas Activity Monitor-Providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release (GH-RE-I 0) b.

Iodine Sampler c.

Particulate Sampler d.

Radwaste Building Vent Flow Rate e.

Particulate and Radioiodine Sampler Flow Rate Monitor 4.

Laundry Decontamination Faciliy Dryer Exhaust a.

Particulate Monitor b.

Particulate Monitor Flow Rate Meter c.

Dryer Exhaust Ventilation Flow Rate I

When the dryers 47 are operating I

When the dryers 47 are operating NA NA NA

CALLAWAY

- SP TABLE 16.11-5 (Sheet 3)

Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.

ACTION 39 Deleted.

ACTION 40 With the number of low range channels FUNCTIONAL less than required by the Minimum Channels FUNCTIONAL requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue for up to 30 days provided grab samples are taken at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months and these samples are analyzed for radioactivity within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months .

ACTION 41 With the number of channels FUNCTIONAL one less than required by the Minimum Channels FUNCTIONAL requirement, restore the affected channel to FUNCTIONAL status within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months .

If the non-functional channel is not restored within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months or with no channels FUNCTIONAL, immediately suspend the release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.

Containment mini-purge supply and exhaust valves that have been closed to satisfy this Action may be opened under administrative controls provided either:

a. one channel is FUNCTIONAL, or

b. the requirements for Table I 6. 11 -5 Function I.a are met and the requirements for minimum channels FUNCTIONAL for the Unit Vent Noble Gas Monitor (GT-RE-21) specified in Table 16.3-f Function 3 are met.

The administrative controls consist of designating a control room operator to rapidly close the valves when a need for system isolation is indicated.

ACTION 42 With the number of channels FUNCTIONAL less than required by the Minimum Channels FUNCTIONAL requirement, and if the containment equipment hatch is open, then immediately suspend CORE ALTERATIONS and movement of irradiated fuel assemblies within containment.

If the containment equipment hatch is not open, then suspend the release of radioactive effluents via this pathway or immediately suspend CORE ALTERATIONS and movement of irradiated fuel assemblies within containment.

ACTION 43 With the number ofchannels FUNCTIONAL less than required by the Minimum Channels FUNCTIONAL requirement, effluent releases via the affected pathway may continue for up to 30 days provided samples are continuously collected with auxiliary sampling equipment as required in Table 16.11-4.

Rev. OL-24 11/19

CALLAWAY - SP TABLE 16.11-5 (Sheet 4)

ACTION 44 Deleted.

ACTION 45 Flow rate for this system shall be based on fan status and operating curves or actual measurements.

ACTION 46 For midrange and high range channels only - with the number of FUNCTIONAL channels less than required by the Minimum Channels FUNCTIONAL requirement, take the action specified in Section 16.3.3.4, ACTION C.

ACTION 47 With the number of channels FUNCTIONAL less than required by the Minumum Channels FUNCTIONAL requirement, immediately suspend the release of radioactivite effluents via this pathway.

Rev. OL-24 11/19

CALLAWAY - SP TABLE 16.11-6 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS INSTRUMENT CHANNEL SOURCE CHECK CHECK CHANNEL CALIBRATION CHANNEL OPERATIONAL IsI MODES FOR WHICH SURVEILLANCE IS REQUIRED I.

Unit Vent System a.

Noble Gas Activity Monitor -

D Providing Alarm (GT-RE-21) b.

Iodine Sampler W

C.

Particulate Sampler d.

UnitVentFlowRate NA.

e.

Particulate and Radioiodine Sampler Flow Rate Monitor 2.

Containment Purge System M

R(3) a.

Noble Gas Activity Monitor -

Providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release (GT-RE 22, GT-RE-33) b.

Iodine Sampler c.

Particulate Sampler d.

Containment Purge Ventilation Flow Rate MODES I 2,3,4 and during CORE ALTERATIONS or movement of irradiated fuel within the containment MODES I 2,3,4 and during CORE ALTERATIONS or movement of irradiated fuel within the containment MODES 1 2,3,4 and during CORE ALTERATIONS or movement of irradiated fuel within the containment MODES 1,2,3,4 and during CORE ALTERATIONS or movement of irradiated fuel within the containment W

D Q(2)

At all times NA.

NA.

At all times NA.

NA.

At all times NA.

R(4)

Q At all times NA.

R Q

At all times NA.

P NA.

NA.

W NA.

NA.

W NA.

NA.

R(4)

NA.

Rev. OL-13 5/03

CALLAWAY - SP TABLE 16.11-6 (Sheet 2)

MODES FOR WHICH CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL CHANNEL OPERATIONAL SURVEILLANCE INSTRUMENT CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION II IS REQUIRED e.

Particulate and Radioiodine D

NA.

R NA.

MODES 1 2,3,4 and during Sampler Flow Rate Monitor CORE ALTERATIONS or movement of irradiated fuel within the containment 3.

Radwaste Building Vent System a.

Noble Gas Activity Monitor -

D,P M,P R(3)

Q(J)

At all times Providing Alarm and Automatic Termination of Release (GH-RE-1 0) b.

Iodine Sampler W

NA.

At all times c.

Particulate Sampler W

NA.

At all times d.

Radwaste Building Vent Flow NA.

NA.

R(4)

NA.

At all times Rate e.

Particulate and Radioiodine D

NA.

R NA.

At all times Sampler Flow Rate Monitor 4.

Laundry Decontamination Facility Dryer Exhaust a.

Particulate Monitor NA D

A Q(5)

When the dryers are operating b.

Particulate Monitor Flow Rate D

NA A

NA When the dryers are operating Meter c.

Dryer Exhaust Ventilation Flow NA NA R(4)

NA When the dryers are operating Rate Rev. OL-13 5/03

CALLAWAY - SP TABLE 1611-6 (Sheet 3)

I.

The CHANNEL OPERATIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that automatic isolation ofthis pathway and control room alarm annunciation occur as appropriate if any of the following conditions exists:

a.

Instrument indicates measured levels above the Alarm/Trip Setpoint (isolation and alarm), or b.

Circuit failure (alarm only), or c.

Instrument indicates a downscale failure (alarm only), or d.

Instrument controls not set in operate mode (alarm only).

2.

The CHANNEL OPERATIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exists:

a.

Instrument indicates measured levels above the Alarm Setpoint, or b.

Circuit failure, or c.

Instrument indicates a downscale failure, or d.

Instrument controls not set in operate mode.

3.

The initial CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be performed using one or more ofthe reference (gas or liquid and solid) standards certified by the National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST) or using standards that have been obtained from suppliers that participate in measurement assurance activities with NIST. These standards shall permit calibrating the system over its intended range of energy, measurement range, and establish monitor response to a solid calibration source. For subsequent CHANNEL CALIBRATION, NIST traceable standard (gas, liquid, or solid) may be used; or a gas, liquid, or solid source that has been calibrated by relating it to equipmentthat was previously (within 30 days) calibrated by the same geometry and type of source standard traceable to NIST.

4.

If flow rate is determined by exhaust fan status and fan performance curves, the following surveillance operations shall be performed at least once per 18 months:

a.

The specific vent flows by direct measurement, or b.

The differential pressure across the exhaust fan and vent flow established by the fans flow-AP curve, or c.

The fan motor horsepower measured and vent flow established by the fans flow-horsepower curve.

5.

The CHANNEL OPERATIONALTEST shall also demonstrate that automatic isolation of this pathway and the shutdown ofthe dryers occur as appropriate if any ofthe following conditions exists:

a.

Instrument indicates measured levels above the Alarm/Trip Setpoint, or b.

Monitor failure.

Rev. OL-13 5/03

CALLAWAY - SP TABLE 16.11-7 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE EXPOSURE PATHWAY SAMPLES AND SAMPLE SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY AND/OR SAMPLE LOCATIONS (1)

COLLECTION FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS Direct Radiation2 Forty routine monitoring stations Quarterly Gamma dose for each sample. Neutron either with two or more dosimeters or dose for the four samples monitoring with one instrument for measuring and SF51 direct radiation.

recording dose rate continuously, placed as follows:

An inner ring of sixteen stations, one in each meteorological sector in the general area ofthe SITE BOUNDARY; Four ofthe stations shall be placed to monitor for gamma and neutron dose from the ISFSI; An outer ring of stations, one in each meteorological sector in the 6-to 8-km (3 to 5 mile) range from the site; and Eight stations to be placed in special interest areas such as population centers, nearby residences, schools, and in one or two areas to serve as control stations.

2.

Airborne Radioiodine and Particulates Samples from five locations; Three samples from close to the SITE Continuous sampler operation with Radioiodine Canister: I-I 31 analysis BOUNDARY locations, in different sample collection weekly, or more for each sample.

sectors, with high calculated annual frequently if required by dust loading.

average ground level D/Qs.

Gamma isotopic analysis(5) for each sample.

One sample from the vicinity of a community located near the plant with a high calculated annual average ground level D/Q.

One sample from a location in the vicinity of Fulton, MO.

Rev. OL-25 6/21

CALLAWAY - SP TABLE 16.11-7 (Sheet 2)

EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS (1)

SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS 3.

Waterborne a.

Surface (6) (river)

One sample upstream One sample downstream Composite sample over 1-month period (7).

Gamma Isotopic(5) and tritium analysis for each sample.

b.

DELETED c.

Groundwater (non-drinking water)

Groundwater samples from non-drinking water shallow and deep12 monitoring wells located as follows:

Samples from one deep well located upgradient ofthe plant power block and one deep well located downgradient of the sludge lagoons.

Quarterly Gamma isotopic5 and tritium analyses for each sample. If contaminated with gamma emitting nuclides of plant origin, analyze for HTD nucIides11.

Samples from six shallow wells or groundwater sumps in locations suitable to monitor for subsurface leakage from power block structures and components.

Samples from five shallow wells located along the discharge pipeline corridor.

Samples from three shallow wells near the property boundary located to monitor for migration of contaminated groundwater from the discharge pipeline to the nearest potable water well.

Rev. OL-25 6/21

CALLAWAY - SP TABLE 16.11-7 (Sheet 3)

EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS (1)

SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS d.

Drinking (rivet watet)

One sample of each of one to three of the neatest water supplies within JO miles downstream that could be affected by its discharge.

Composite sample ovet 2-week period7 when l-J3J analysis is performed, monthly composite otherwise.

l-J3J analysis on each composite when the dose calculated for the consumption of the watet is greater than J mrem per year9). Composite fot gtoss beta and gamma isotopic analyses5 monthly. Composite for ttitium analysis quarterly.

One sample ftom a conttol location.

As there are no drinking water intakes within JO miles downstteam ofthe dischatge point, the drinking water pathway is currently not included as part ofthe Callaway Plant Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program. Should the annual Land Use Census identify watet intakes within JO rivet miles downstream ofthe dischatge point, the ptogtam will be tevised to include this pathway.

Samples of potable well watet apptopriate fot monitoring fot radioactivity in drinking watet supplies in areas mostlikely to be affected by a spill or leak.

Two samples of potable well watet ftom the community of Portland, MO.

One sample of Callaway Plant potable water.

One sample of potable well water from each tesident botdeting plant property along Mud Cteek and Logan Creek.

Gamma sotopic5 and ttitium analyses fot each sample. If contaminated with nuclides of plant origin, analyze lot HTD nuclides11.

I.

Sediment ftom tiver shoteline One sample from downstream atea with existing or potential recreational value Semiannually Gamma isotopic analysist5 for each sample One sample ftom upstream control location.

Rev. OL-25 6/21 e.

Drinking (potable well water)

Quarterly

CALLAWAY - SP TABLE 16.11-7 (Sheet 4)

NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE EXPOSURE PATHWAY SAMPLES AND SAMPLE SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY AND/OR SAMPLE LOCATIONS COLLECTION FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS g.

Shoreline sediment from sludge Shoreline sediment from each on site Annually Gamma isotopic5 analysis for each ponds sludge pond most likely to be affected.

sample.

One sample from each in-service sludge pond.

One sample from each wetlands pond.

4.

Ingestion a.

Milk Samples from milking animals in three Semimonthly when animals are on Gamma isotopic5 and 1-131 analyses different meteorological sectors within pasture, monthly at other times for each sample 5 km (3 mile) distance having the highest dose potential. lfthere are none, then one sample from milking animals in each ofthree different meteorological sectors between 5 to 8 km (3 to 5 mile) distance where doses are calculated to be greater than I mrem per yr.f9)

One sample from milking animals at a control location, 1 5 to 30 km (1 0 to 20 mile) distance and in the least prevalent wind direction.

Due to the lack of milking animals which satisfy these requirements, the milk pathway is currently not included as part ofthe Callaway Plant Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program. Should the Annual Land Use Census identify the existence of milking animals in locations which satisfy these requirements, then the program will be revised to include this pathway.

b.

Fish One sample ofeach commercially and Sample in season, or semiannually if Gamma isotopic analysis5 on edible recreationally important species in they are not seasonal portions for each sample vicinity of plant discharge area.

One sample of same species in areas not influenced by plant discharge.

Rev. OL-25 6/21

CALLAWAY - SP TABLE 16.11-7 (Sheet 5)

NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE EXPOSURE PATHWAY SAMPLES AND SAMPLE SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY AND/OR SAMPLE LOCATIONS (1)

COLLECTION FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS C.

Food Products One sample of each principal class of At time of harvestt10 Gamma isotopic analysist5 on edible food products from any area that is portion for each sample irrigated by water in which liquid plant wastes have been discharged.

As there are no areas irrigated by water in which liquid plant wastes have been discharged within 50 miles downstream ofthe discharge point, this sample type is not currently included as part ofthe Callaway Plant Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program. Should the annual Land Use Census identify irrigation water intakes within 1 0 river miles downstream ofthe discharge point, the program will be revised to include this sample type.

Samples ofthree different kinds of Monthly when available Gamma isotopic (5) and 1-131 broad leaf vegetation if available analyses grown nearest each of two different offsite locations of highest predicted annual average ground level D/Q if milk sampling is not performed One sample of each ofthe similar Monthly when available Gamma isotopic (5) and 1-131 broad leaf vegetation grown I 5 to 30 analyses km (10 to 20 mile) distant in the least prevalent wind direction if milk sampling is not performed 5.

Soil Surface soil samples suitable for Annually Gamma isotopic5 analysis for each monitoring for ground deposition if sample.

radioactivity in gaseous effluents as follows:

Four ecology plots located in four quadrants surrounding the plant.

One control location from an area not likely to be influenced by plant gaseous effluents.

1 Rev. OL-25 6/21

CALLAWAY - SP TABLE 16.11-7 (Sheet 6)

TABLE NOTATIONS 1.

Specific parameters of distance and direction sector from the centerline of one unit, and additional description where pertinent, shall be provided for each and every sample location in Table 16.11-7 in a table and figure(s) in the appropriate plant procedures. Deviations are permitted from the required sampling schedule ifspecimens are unobtainable due to hazardous conditions, seasonal unavailability, malfunction of automatic sampling equipment, and other legitimate reasons. If specimens are unobtainable due to sampling equipment malfunction, every effort shall be made to complete corrective action prior to the end ofthe next sampling period. All deviations from the sampling schedule shall be documented in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to Technical Specification 5.6.2.

It is recognized that, at times, it may not be possible or practicable to continue to obtain samples of the media of choice at the most desired location or time. In these instances suitable specific alternative media and locations may be chosen for the particular pathway in question and appropriate substitutions made within 30 days in the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program. Submit in the nextAnnual Radiological Environmental Operating Report documentation for a change induding the revised figure(s) and table reflecting the new location(s) with supporting information identifying the cause ofthe unavailability of samples for that pathway and justifying the selection ofthe new location(s) for obtaining samples.

The selection of sample locations should consider accessibility of sample site, availability of power, wind direction frequency, sector population, equipment security, and the presence of potentially adverse environmental conditions (such as unusually dusty conditions, etc.).

2.

One or more instruments, such as a pressurized ion chamber, for measuring and recording dose rate continuously may be used in place of, or in addition to, integrating dosimeters.

For the purposes of this table, a thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) and/or an optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter (OSLD), are considered to be one phosphor; two or more phosphors in a packet are considered as two or more dosimeters. Film badges shall not be used as dosimeters for measuring direct radiation. The number of direct radiation monitoring stations may be reduced according to geographical limitations; e.g., at an ocean site, some sectors will be over water so that the number of dosimeters may be reduced accordingly. The frequency of analysis or readout for TLD systems will depend upon the characteristics of the specific system used and should be selected to obtain optimum dose information with minimal fading.

3.

Deleted.

4.

Deleted.

5.

Gamma isotopic analysis means the identification and quantification of gamma-emitting radionuclides that may be attributable to the effluents from the facility.

6.

The upstream sample shall be taken at a distance beyond significant influence of the discharge. The downstream sample shall be taken in an area near the downstream edge of the mixing zone.

7.

In this program, composite sample aliquots shall be collected at time intervals that are very short (e.g., hourly) relative to the compositing period (e.g., monthly) in order to assure obtaining a representative sample.

8.

Groundwater samples shall be taken when this source is tapped for drinking or irrigation purposes in areas where the hydraulic gradient or recharge properties are suitable for contamination.

9.

The dose shall be calculated for the maximum organ and age group, using the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.

I 0. If harvest occurs more than once a year, sampling shall be performed during each discrete harvest.

If harvest occurs continuously, sampling shall be monthly. Attention shall be paid to including samples of tuberous and root food products.

Rev. OL-25 6/21

CALLAWAY - SP TABLE 16.11-7 (Sheet 7) 11. In this program, HTD nuclides are defined as 89Sr, 90Sr, 55Fe, 63Ni, 237Np, 238Pu, 241Am, 242Cm, and 2431244Cm.

12. In this program, a shallow well is defined as a well which extracts groundwater from the vadose zone. A deep well is defined as a well which extracts groundwater from the saturated zone.

Rev. OL-25 6/21

CALLAWAY - SP TABLE 16.11-8 REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES REPORTING LEVELS FISH WATER AIRBORNE PARTICULATE (pCi/kg, MILK FOOD PRODUCTS ANALYSIS (pCj/)a OR GASES (pCi/rn3) wet)b (pCi/fla pCi/kg, wet)b H-3 20,000*

Mn-54 1,000 30,000 Fe-59 400 10,000 Co-58 I 000 30,000 Co-60 300 10,000 Zn-65 300 20,000 ZrNb95**

400 1-131 2

0.9 3

100 Cs-i 34 30 1 0 1 000 60 1,000 Cs-137 50 20 2,000 70 2,000 BaLa140**

200 300 (a) Multiply the values in this table by I E-9 to convert to units of pCi/mI.

(b) Multiply the values in this table by I E-9 to convert to units of pCi/g.

For drinking water samples. This is 40 CFR Part 141 value. For surface water samples, a value of 30,000 pCi/e may be used.

Total activity, parent plus daughter activity.

Rev. CL-I 4 I 2/04

CALLAWAY - SP TABLE 16.11-9 DETECTION CAPABILITITES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) (1), (2)

(3)

FOOD AIRBORNE FISH PRODUCTS SEDIMENT SURFACE DRINKING PARTICULATE (pCi/kg, MILK (pCi/kg, (pCi/kg, ANALYSIS WATER (pCi/e)a WATER (pCi/c)a OR GASES (pCi/rn3) wet)b (pCi/)a wet)b dry)b Gross Beta 4

4 0.01 H-3 3000 2000 Mn-54 15 15 130 Fe-59 30 30 260 Co-58,60 15 15 130 Zn-65 30 30 260 ZrNb95*

I 5 15 1-131 1

0.07 1

60 Cs-134 15 15 0.05 130 15 60 150 Cs-137 18 18 0.06 150 18 80 180 BaLa140*

15 15 15 (a) Multiply the values in this table by I E-9 to convert to units of pCi/mi.

(b) Multiply the values in this table by I E-9 to convert to units of pCi/g.

Total activity, parent plus daughter activity.

For surface water samples, the LLD of gamma isotopic analysis may be used.

Rev. OL-23 6/18

CALLAWAY - SP TABLE 16.11-9 (Sheet 2)

TABLE NOTATIONS I.

This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. Other peaks that are identifiable, together with those ofthe listed nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report.

2.

Required detection capabilities for thermoluminescent dosimeters used for environmental measurements shall be in accordance with the recommendations of Regulatory Guide 4.13, Revision 1, July 1977.

3.

The LLD is defined, for purposes of these Requirements, as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count, above system background, that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability offalsely concluding that a blank observation represents a real signal.

For a particular measurement system, which may include radiochemical separation:

4.66S LLD=

b E x V x 2.22E6 x Y x exp()At)

Where:

LLD

= the a priori lower limit of detection (microCuries per unit mass or volume),

5b

= the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (counts per minute),

E

= the counting efficiency (counts per disintegration),

V

= the sample size (units of mass or volume),

2.22E6

= the number of disintegrations per minute per microCurie, Y

= the fractional radiochemical yield, when applicable,

= the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide (sec1), and At

=

the elapsed time between the end ofthe sample collection period, and the time of counting (sec).

Typical values of E, V, Y, and At should be used in the calculation.

It should be recognized thatthe LLD is defined as a a priori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement. Analyses shall be performed in such a manner that the stated LLDs will be achieved under routine conditions.

Rev. OL-23 6/18

ULNRC-06868, Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report

Text

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search