Search results

Will Be Taken Corrective actions are in place to determine a permanent solution to the E22-S003 transformer. Corrective Actions to Prevent Reoccurrence (CAPR)

Finding. The purpose of this letter is to provide the required written response to NOV 05000395/2023002-001, pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201. Attachment 1 provides

Results Achieved In response to the potential violation debriefed on the DTF. The licensee took prompt actions: Corrective Action Program (CAP) Incident

Plant - Units 1 and 2 Response to Apparent Violation in NRC Inspection Report 05000424, 425/2023090; EA-22-108 Enclosure Response to Apparent Violation in

Atlanta, GA 30303-1200 Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant - Units 1 and 2 Response to NRC Inspection Report 05000348/2022440 and 05000364/2022440 EA-22-101

information to ensure that licensee personnel are qualified to perform safety-related activities. This is a Severity Level IV violation (NRC Enforcement Policy

air. Contrary to the above, on May 28, 2021, the licensee failed to use, to the extent practical, process or other engineering controls to control the concentration

power operation primary to secondary pressure differential. Contrary to the above, on November 5, 2023, the licensee failed to ensure that all in-service

20852-2738 EA-23-118 - Missing NRC' s 90-day written response to Aerotest Operations, Inc. response to NRC Inspection Report 050-00228/2023-001 and dispute

Category:Letter type:SVP [Table view] Category:Licensee Response to Enforcement Action [Table view] Category:Licensee Response to Notice of Violation [Table view]

dated 3/6/19 was submitted to the NRC, Mitch Wilkinson was the acting CFH supervisor from when the last operator left (10/1/19) to 10/9/2020 and Malcom McCarthy

Report 05000414/2017012; Enforcement Action 17-122 Corrective Actions Planned Interim Action - Implement an engineering change to replace EDG voltage regulator

MD 20852-2738 Response to Apparent Violations in NRC Special Inspection Report 05000602/2022201;EA-22-134 This letter is in response to the apparent violation

Category:Letter [Table view] Category:Licensee Response to Enforcement Action [Table view] Category:Licensee Response to Notice of Violation [Table view]

Counsel (OGC) and that the action was based, at least in part, on the former employee engaging in protected activity. TVA Response to the Violation TVA disagrees

individual to perform his assigned fire watch rounds and then deliberately document that the fire watch rounds were complete. Dominion's response to the Notice

adverse action, and that the action is consistent with action taken for similarly situated employees. The ERB process also considers negative impacts to a Safety

Cooling to Normal Operating Lineup," to fill the ECCS suction lines with borated water prior to returning the system to a mode where it is required to be OPERABLE

Plan, and Responses to Phase 1 Interim Staff Evaluation Open Items in Response to June 6, 2013 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable

NPF-58 Reply to a Notice of Violation; EA-03-208 Ladies and Gentlemen: Enclosed is the reply to the Notice of Violation, EA-03-208, issued to the Perry Nuclear