RS-05-176, Affidavit and Attachment 6 to Exelon Letter Dated December 15, 2005

Affidavit and Attachment 6 to Exelon Letter Dated December 15, 2005

ML060730370
Person / Time
Site:	Quad Cities
Issue date:	12/13/2005
From:	Maurer B Westinghouse
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
CAW-05-2080, NF-BEX-05-188 P, RS-05-176
Download: ML060730370 (32)

Text

Westinghouse Application for Withholding, Affidavit, and Non-Proprietary Version of Attachment 5

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Direct tek (412) 3744419

]Document Control Desk Direct fax: (412) 374-4011 Washington, DC 20555-0001 e-mail : maurerbf@westinghouse.com

Subject:

NF-BEX-05-188 P-Attachment, Quad Cities Unit 2, Cycle 19 SLMCPR (Proprietary)

The proprietary information for which withholding is being requested in the above-referenced report is further identified in Affidavit CAW-05-2080 signed by the owner of the proprietary information, Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. The affidavit, which accompanies this letter, sets forth the basis on which the information may be withheld from public disclosure by the Commission and addresses witl specificity the considerations listed in paragraph (b)(4) of 10 CFR Section 2.390 of the Commission's regulations.

Accordingly, this letter authorizes the utilization of the accompanying affidavit by Exelon Generation.

Correspondence with respect to the proprietary aspects of the application for withholding or the Westinghouse affidavit should reference this letter, CAW-05-2080 and should be addressed to B. F. Maurer, Acting Manager, Regulatory Compliance and Plant Licensing, Westinghouse Electric Company LLQ 1% Box 355, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230-0355.

Very truly yours, Acting Manager Regulatory Compliance and Plant Licensing Enclosures cc :

L. Rossbach/NRR F, M. A-kstulewicz/NRR G. S. Shukla/NRR L. 14. FeizoHahi/NRR (affidavit only)

APPLICATION FOR WITHHOLDING PROPRIETARY INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE Westinghouse Electric Company Nuclear Services P.O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230-0355 USA Our ref: CAW-05-2080 December 13, 2005 A BNFL Group company

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA :

COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY :

Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared B. F. Maurer, who, being by me duly sworn according to law, deposes and says that he is authorized to execute this Affidavit on Westinghouse Electric Company LLC (Westinghouse), and that the averments of fact set Affidavit are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief :

Sworn to and subscribed, before me this _/ _

day 2005 Notary Public AFFIDAVIT ss CAW-05-2080 alf of this B. F. Maurer, Acting Manager Regulatory Compliance and Plant Licensing

CAW-05-2080 (1) 1 am Acting Manager, Regulatory Compliance and Plant Licensing, in Nuclear Services, Westinghouse Electric Company LLC (Westinghouse), and as such, I have been specifically delegated the function of reviewing the proprietary information sought to be withheld from public disclosure in connection with nuclear power plant licensing and rule making proceedings, and am authorized to apply for its withholding on behalf of Westinghouse.

(2) 1 am making this Affidavit in conformance with the provisions of 10 CFR Section 2.390 o Commission's regulations and in conjunction with the Westinghouse application for withholding accompanying this Affidavit.

(4)

Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(4) of Section 2.390 of the Commission's regulati the following is furnished for consideration by the Commission in determining whether the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure should be withheld.

I have personal knowledge of the criteria and procedures utilized by Westinghouse in designating information as a trade secret, privileged or as confidential commercial or financial information.

(i)

The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure is owned and has been held in confidence by Westinghouse.

The information is of a type customarily held in confidence by Westinghouse and not customarily disclosed to the public. Westinghouse has a rational basis for determining the types of information customarily held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of information in confidence. The application of that system and the substance of that system cons Westinghouse policy and provides the rational basis required.

s Under that system, information is held in confidence if it falls in one or more of several types, the release of which might result in the loss of an existing or potential competitive advantage, as follows :

(a)

The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or componen structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies.

(b)

It consists of supporting data, including test data, relative to a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.), the application of which data secures a competitive economic advantage, e.g., by optimization or improved etability.

(c)

Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product.

(d)

It reveals cost or price information, production capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of Westinghouse, its customers or suppliers.

(e)

It reveals aspects of past, present, or future Westinghouse or customer funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Westinghouse.

There are following :

(a)

The use of such information by Westinghouse gives Westinghouse a competitive advantage over its competitors. It is, therefore, withheld from disclosure to protect the Westinghouse competitive position.

(b)

It is information that is marketable in many ways. The extent to which such information is available to competitors diminishes the Westinghouse ability to sell products and services involving the use of the information.

(c)

Use by our competitor would put Westinghouse at a competitive disadvantage by reducin(2 his expenditure of resources at our expense.

(d)

Each component of proprietary information pertinent to a particular competitive advantage is potentially as valuable as the total competitive advantage. If competitors acquire components of proprietary information, any one component may be the key to the entire puzzle, thereby depriving Westinghouse of a competitive advantage.

(e)

Unrestricted disclosure would jeopardize the position of prominence of Westinghouse in the world market, and thereby give a market advant, of those countries.

s patentable ideas, for which patent protection may be desirable.

policy reasons behind the Westinghouse system which include the The Westinghouse capacity to invest corporate assets in research and development depends upon the success in obtaining and maintaining a competitive advantage.

CAW-05-2080 o the formation is being transmitted to the Commission in confidence and, under the provisions of 10 CFR Section 2.390, it is to be received in confidence by the Commission.

The information sought to be protected is not available in public sources or available information has not been previously employed in the same original manner or method to the best of our knowledge and belief.

(v)

The proprietary information sought to be withheld in this submittal is that which is appropriately marked in "NF-BEX-fly-188 P-Attachment to Quad Cities Unit 2 Cycle 19 SLMCPR" (Proprietary), for review and approval, being transmitted by Exelon Nuclear letter and Application for Withholding Proprietary Information from Public Disclosure, to the Document Control Desk. The proprietary information as submitted by Westinghouse for Quad Cities Unit 2 Cycle 19 SLMCPR for review and approval.

This information is part o (a)

Support Exelon's use of Westin (b)

Assist customer to obtain Further this information has substantial commercial value as follows :

(a)

Westinghouse can use this information to further enhance their licen with their competitors.

Public disclosure of this proprietary competitive position of Westin competitors to provide similar analyses The information requested to be withheld reveals the distinguishing aspects of a methodology which was developed by Westinghouse.

information is likely to cause substantial harm to the se because it would enhance the ability of defense services for commercial power reactors without commensurate expenses. Also, public disclosure of the information would enable others to use the information to meet NRC requirements for licensing documentation without purchasing the right to use the information.

Further the deponent sayeth not.

vill enable Westinghouse to :

se chin able sum of money.

se Fuel at Quad City and Dresden.

CAW-05-2080 position The development of the technology described in part by the information is the result of applying the results of many years of experience in an intensive Westinghouse effort and the expenditure of a consi In order for competitors of Westinghouse to duplicate this information, similar technical programs would have to be performed and a significant manpower effort, having the requisite talent and experience, would have to be expended.

Transmitted herewith are proprietary and/or non-proprietary versions of doc in connection with requests for generic and/or plant-specific review and approval.

In order to conform to the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 of the Commission's regulations concerning the protection of proprietary information so submitted to the NRC, the information which is proprietary in the proprietary versions is contained within brackets, and where the proprietary information has been deleted e information that was contained within the stification for claiming the information s of lower case letters (a) through (1) located as a superscript immediately following the brackets enclosing each item of information being identified as proprietary or in the margin opposite such information. These lower case letters refer to the types of information Westinghouse customarily holds in confidence identified in Sections (4)(ii)(a) through (4)(ii)(f) of the affidavit accompanying this transmittal pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1).

e non-proprietary versions, only the brackets rema brackets in the proprietary versions having been deleted). The so designated as proprietary is indicated in both versions by me Proprietary Information Notice The reports transmitted herewith each bear a Westinghouse copyright notice. The NRC is permi make the number of copies of the information contained in these reports which are necessary ection with generic and plant-specific reviews and approvals as well as the issuance, denial, amendment, transfer, renewal, modification, suspension, revocation, or violation of a license, permit, order, or regulation subject to the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 regarding restrictions on public disclosure to the extent such information has been identified as proprietary by Westinghouse, copyright protection notwithstanding. With respect to the non-proprietary versions of these reports, the NRC is permitted to make the number of copies beyond those necessary for its internal use which are necessary in order to have one copy available for public viewing in the appropriate docket files in the public document room in Washington, DC and in local public document rooms as may be required by NRC regulations if the number of copies submitted is insufficient for this purpose. Copies made by the NRC must include the copyright notice in all instances and the proprietary notice if the original was identified as proprietary.

Copyright Notice to the NRC

Westinghouse Norm-Proprietary Class 3 Cities Unit 2, Cycle 19 SL Pittsburgh, Westinghouse Electric Company P.O. Box 355 nsylvania 15230-0355

© 2005 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved NF-BEX-05-188 hment

1.0 Introduction 2.0 ocument contains a description of the safety limit minimum critical power ratio CPR) evaluation for Quad Cities 2 (QC2) Cycle 19, as well as a summary of the ouse establishment of a critical power ratio (CPR) correlation for Global Nuclear Fuel (GNF) GE14 fuel

. As discussed below, dual and single recirculation loop SLMCPRs of 1.

and 1.10, respectively, will be applied to the GE14 fuel in Quad Cities 2 Cycle 19. Dual and gle recirculation loop SLMCPRs of 1.11 and 1.13, respectively, have been calculated for the Westinghouse SVEA-96 Optima2 assemblies in Quad Cities 2 Cycle 19.

The GNF NRC-approved methodology (References I and 2) was used previously to determine the appropriate SLMCPR values for the currently operating QC2 Cycle 18, which contains GNF GE 14 and Framatome-ANP (FANP) ATRIUM-913 fuel assemblies. Consistent with the GNF methodology, the resulting Cycle 18 SLMCPRs apply to all fuel types in the core, such that the same SLMCPRs are applied to both the GE14and ATRIUM-913 fuel assemblies.

n Generation Company, LLC (EGC) will load Westinghouse SVEA-efore, the Westinghouse NRC-approved methodology described in cc 3 and further clarified in the response to request for additional information (RAI)

D13 of Reference 4, was used to determine the SLMCPRs for Cycle 1.9.

Unlike the GNF methodology, On June 15, 2005, EGC Submitted a proposed license amendment to request NRC approval to use the Westinghouse methodology for core reload evaluations at QC2.

This submittal (Reference 8) is currently under NRC review, and is scheduled to receive NRC approval prior to QC2 startup with a reload core containing SVEA-96 Optima2 fuel (i.e., Cycle 19).

Condition 7 in the NRC safety evaluation for Reference 3 requires that a conservative factor applied to the GE14 operating limit minimum critical power ratio (OLMCPR) be identified in licensee applications. The value of this factor is [

]

a,c CPR for Quad Cities 2 Cycle 19 Consistent with the Westi SL14CPF?

h Tres containing non-Westinghouse fuel I Page 1 of 24 thodology described in Reference 3, the treatment of the

]

2'c QC2 Cycle 18 contained 508 assembles and 216 ATRIUM-% fuel assemblies. As shown in Figure 2, all of the fuel assemblies were in their third cycle of operation and were loaded on or near

the core periphery in Cycle 18 (withi the central part of the core.

Therefore, the SLMCPR for Cycle IS was established by ions from the GE14 fuel assembI I

a,c The Cycle 18 SLMCPR was determined by GNF based on plant-and cycle-specific analyses using GNPs NRC-approved methodology and uncertainties (References I and 2) as supplemented with QC2-specific uncertainties. The GNF used the GEXL14 correlation for GE14 fuel.

As shown in Reference 5, the resulting dual-loop and single-loop SLMCPRs for Cycle 18 are 1.09 and 1.10, respectively.

Table I.

3.0 SVEA-96 Optimal SLMCPR for Cycle 19 In establishing the SLMCPR for Westinghouse SVEA-9 assumed that I Core (SVEA-96 Optimal bundle designs, core loading pattern and state point depletion strategy) that represents realistic current plans for Cycle 19 loading and operation, The Reference Core loading pattern for Cycle 19 is ?own in Figure I - The Reference Core design was generated laboration between EGC and Westinghouse based oil EGC's cycle assumptions and The Reference Core was designed to meet We cycle energy requirements, to ing requirements, to provide adequate thermal margins and operational other design and manufacturing criteria established by EGC and The I

a,c A comparison between the Cycle I

In general, the calculated SL14CPFR is dominated by the flatness of the assembly CPR ibution across the core and the flatness of the relative vin CPR distribution based on the n power/R-factor distribution in each bundle. Greater flatness in either parameter yields more rods susceptible to boiling transition and thus a higher SLMCPR.

The calculation of the SLMCPR as a function of cycle exposure captures the interplay between the relative fuel assembly CPR and bundle relative pin-by-pin CPR distributions established the power/R-factor distributions and allows a determination of the maximum (limiting)

SLAACHO for the entire cycle. This limiting SLN4CPR is applied throughout the entire cycle.

exposure based on the cycle exposure-dependent radix the GE 14 fuel was loaded in Page 2 of 24 19 cores is shown nag fuel assemblies, it is Cycle 19 was determined as a function of cycle distributions from I

Accordingly, the SVEA-96 Optimal SLMCPR for dual recirculation loop operation was calculated at 100% power and 100% flow at I I cycle exposures throughout the cycle to assure limiting SLMCPR was identified.

In addition, the dual recirculation loop SLMCPRs were calculated at 10095 power at the minimum allowed core flow at rated power and the maximum allowed core flow at rated power (108% flow) at the maximum 100% core flow SLMCPR cycle burnup to confirm that a limiting SLMCPR had been established. Figure 3 shows a current Quad Cities 2 power-to-flow map, which is applicable to Cycle 19.

Single recirculation loop SVEA-96 Optimal SLMCPR calculations were also performed.

These SLMCPR calculations were performed at the I The SLMCPR results for Cycle 19 are plotted in Figure 4. As shown in Fi op calculations used the same procedure as the dual loop cases cases applied a larger uncertainty n loop SLMCPR I I

a'C the interplay between the assembly relative CPRs and the relative fuel rod CPRs. In general, as the fraction of assembly or fuel rod CPRs ity of the minimum assembly or fuel rod CPR increases, the number of rods with a I for experiencing dryout increases. 'Therefore, a larger SLMCPR is required to assure er than 0. 1% of the rods are in dryout.

a,c ce has shown that the assembly CPR distributions tend to become I I a" Therefore, the peak SI-NMCPR tends to occur when the assembly CPR and rod CPR distributions combine to place the maximum number of fuel rod close to the minirnum CPR.

Page 3 of 24 This behavior is shown for the Quad Cities 2, Cycle 19 SLMCPR by the relative assembly CPR and relative fuel rod histograms shown in Figures 5 through I I and 12 through 16, respectively. In Figures 5 through 11, assembly types UA 19 and 1.71319 refer to the SVEA-96

Qtima2 assembly types loaded in cycle I

2.

3.

The single recirculation loop results calculated at I bly type I

a'C Inspection of the histograms in the dual recirculation loop histograms and the relative fuel rod CPR histograms in Figures 12 through 16 leads to the following observations, which explain the SLMCPR behavior in Figure, 4:

Figures 5 throe Therefore, the dual recirculation loop SI-MCPR results at rated conditions in Figure 4 can be understood in terms of I a'C As shown in Figure 3, QC2 can operate at rated power in a flow window from 95.3% core flow to 108% core flow. Therefore, the continued adequacy of a dual recirculation loop SLMCPR

In addition to the strong dependence on assembly CPR and relative fuel rod CPR distributions, the SLMCPR is strongly dependent on the distribution of assembly and relative fuel pin CPRs about their mean values leading to an overall distribution of fuel rod CPRs relative to mean values. The wider these distributions, the higher the SI,MCPR must be to prevent 0.1 %

fuel rods from experiencing boiling transition.

The distributions of fuel rod CPRs mean values are determined by the uncertainties in determining the mean CPRs. Accordingly, the uncertainties used in establishing the SVEA-96 Optima2 SLMCPR for Cycle 19 are shown in Table 2.

souse has generated a CPR correlation for use with GE14 fuel in reload design and analyses. This correlation, which is referred to as the USAG14 correlation, will be ish the GE14 fuel OLMCPR in accordance with the methodology described in Reference 3. The USAG14 correlati I

a,c 4.0 Westinghouse CPR Correlation for GE14 Fuel adequately conservative.

I as formed I Page 5 of 24 ordance with Condition 7 of the NRC safety evaluation for Reference 3, Westinghouse determined an appropriate adjustment factor that is applied when using the USAG14 correlation to determine the GE14 OLPOCPR values. This adjustment factor accounts for possible variation between the CPR calculated by the USAG14 correlation and the GEXL14 CPR data provided by EGC.

It also ensures that the resulting GE14 OLMCPR values are ition of this value was also based on EGCs plans to continue to monitor the CPR performance of GE14 fuel using the GNF GEXL14 correlation within the POWERPLEX-111 online core monitoring system rather than the USAG14 correlation.

This approach is tinghouse's NRC-approved methodology per Reference 3.

I a,c In accordance with Condition 7 of the NRC safety evaluation for Reference 3, this value must be submitted as part of the licensee's application for the transition to Westinghouse fuel. Accordingly, this issue was addressed in Reference 8 (Table 3 of Attachment 7), which provided a value for this adjustment factor I 5.0 References 1.

Letter, Frank Akstulewicz (NRQ to Glen A. Watford (GE), "Acceptance for Referencing of Licensing Topical Reports NEDC-32601 P, Methodology and Uncertaintiesfi)r Safety Limit MCPR Evaluations ;

-32694P, Power Distribution Uncertainties fiv Safety Limit MCPR Evaluation ; and Amendment 25 to NEDE-2401 I -P-A on Cycle Specific Safety Limit MCPR," (TAC Nos. M97490, M99069, and M97491), March 11, 1999.

2.

General Electric B WR Thermal Analysis Basis (GETAB) : Data, Correlation, and Design Application, NEDO-10958-A, January 1977.

3.

Licensing Topical Report. RejerenceSqfety Report for Boiling Water Reactor Reload Fuel, CENPD-300-P-A, July 1996.

4.

CENPD-389-P-A, 10.00 SVEA Fuel Critical Power Experiments and CPR Correlations: SVEA-96+,

999.

5.

Letter, Lawrence W. Rossbach (NRC) to Christopher M. Crane (Exelon Generation Company, LLCM},

Cities Nuclear Power Station, unit 2 - Issuance qfAmendtnent (TAC No. MC1329), dated March 10, 2004, 16081 -P-A, 10x10 SVEA Fuel Critical Power Experiments and CPR Correlation : SVE,4-96 Optitna2, March 2005.

7.

Letter, Jason S. Post (GE Deterininationjor GE14 an,(]

Energy - Nuclear, 10 CFR Part 21 Communication, 60-Day Interim Report Notification and Transfer of Iql6rtnation, Critical Power Detertninationfbr GE14 and GE 12 Fuel With Zircaloy Spacers, SC05-04 Rev I, June 24, 2005 8.

Letter, Patrick R. Simpson (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to NRC, Request jar License Amendment Regarding Transilion to Westinghouse Fuel, dated June 15, 2(X)5.

I a,c t 2160 Day Interim Report Notifzc-ation : Critical Power riel With Zircaloy Spacers,05-058 Rev 1, June 24, 2005, Page 6 of

Table 1 Comparison of Cycle 18 and 19 Cores Age 7 of 24 Description Quad Cities 2 Cycle 18 Quad Cities 2 19

- Cycle Number of Bundles in Core 724 Limiting Cycle Exposure Point N/A (GNF pro2ri tary)

Near EOC Cycle Exposure at Limiting Point, EFPH NIA (GNF proprietary) 12,219 13FPIH Reload Fuel Type GE14 SVEAn6 Optima2 Reload Batch Average Weight % Enrichment 309 Wo 301 w/o Reload Batch Fraction (%)

311%

315%

Batch Fraction of SVEA06 OWN Fuel 000%

3I M Batch Fraction of GNF GE14 Fuel 701%

685%

Batch Fraction of FANP ATRIUM-9B Fuel 29A%

040%

Core Average Weight % Enrichment 307 w/o 3,99 w/o Calculated Safety Limit MCPR (DLO) 109 in all awl types XC Calculated Safety Limit MCPR (SLO)

I.l0 to all fuel types ax

Page 8 of 24 2 - Uncertainties used in Quad Cities 2 Cycle 19 SVEA-96 Optima2 SLMCPR Determination

1 2

3 4

5 6

7 8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1

2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 1011 121314 15 161718192021 222324252627282930 3b 3b 3a 3b 3a 3b 3a 3a 3b 3b 3a 3b 3a 3b 3a 3b 3a 3b 3b 3a 3b 3b 3b 3b 1 b 3b 1b 3b 3b 3a 3a 3b 3b 3a 3b 3b 3b 3b 3a 3b 3b 2b 3a 1 b 2a 1b 3a 3b 3a 3b 3b 1b 1a 1]2a 2a tb 1a 1b 2a ib 2a 1b 2b 3b 3b 3b 3a 3b 3b 3b 3b 3a 3b 3a 3a 2a 1b 2a 1b 2b 2a 1a 1a 2a 1a 2b 1b 2a 1b 2a 3a 3b 3b 3b ib 1b 1 b 3a 2b 1a 1a 2a 2a 1 a 1a 2b 2b - 2b l 2b 2b Fl b 3a 1b 1b 3b 3a 3a 3b 3b 2b 2a 1b 2b 1a 2a 1a 2b 1a 2b 1a 2b 1a 2b 1a 2b 2b 1a 2b 1a 2b 1a 2b 1a 2b 1a 2a 1a 2b 1a 2a la 2b 2a 1b 3b 2b 3a 3b 3b 3a 3a 3a 3b 3b 3b 3b 3a 3a 3a tb 2a 1a 2a is 2b 2a 1a 1a 2b 1a 2b 2a la 1a la 2a 1 a 1a 2b 2b 1a 2a 1 a 1a 2b 2a la 2a 1b 1b 2a 3a 3a 3b 3b 3b 3b 1b 2a 1b 2a 1a 1 a 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 3a 3b 3b 3a 3b 1b 2a 1a 2b 1a 1 a 2b 2b 1 a 2b 1a 1a 2b 2b 1a 2b 2b 2b 1a 1a 2b la 2b 2b 1a la 2b la 2b 2b 1a ib 2a 1b 3b 3a 3b ib 2b 3b 3b 3a 3a 3a 1b 1a 2a 2a 1a la 2b 1a 2b 2a 1a 1a 2b 1a 2b 2b 1a 1a 1a 2b la 1a 2b 2b 1a 2a 1a 1a 2b 2b 1a 2a la 1 a 2a 1b 3a 3a 3a 3b 3b 3a 3a 1b 1b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 3a 3a 3a 3a 2b 2b 2b 2b 1b 1b 3a 3a 3b 3b 3a 3a 3a 1b 2a 1a 1a 2a 1a 2b 2b 1a 1a 2a la 2b 2b 1a 1a 2b 1a la 1 a 2b 2b 1a 2b la 1 a 2a 2b la 24 1a 1a 2a 2a 1a ib 3a 3a 3a 3b 3b 3b 3a 3b tb 2a 1a 2b 1a 2b 1a 2b 1a 2b la 2b 2b la 2b 1a 2b 1a 2b 1a 2b la 2a ib 3b 3a 3b c l - QUad Cities 2 Cycle 19 - Reference I.oadin 3b 3b 1 b 3b 1 a 2a 2b 1a 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 3a 3b 3b 3a 1b 2a 2b 1b la 2b 2b 1a 1a 2b 2b la 2b 1a 1a 2b 2b 1a 1a 2b 2b 1b 1b2 3b 3a 3a 3b 1b 3b 3b 3b of 24 Designation Bundle T e Bundle Name Number of Bundles Cycle Loaded la O fma2 O t2-3.89-16GZ8.00-2G6.00 152 19 tb O fma2 O t2-3.94-13GZT00-2G6.00 76 19 2a GE14 GE14-P1ODNAB418-16GZ-2646 80 18 2b GE14 GE14-P1ODNAB389-18GZ-2650 160 18 GE14 GE14-PI 0DNAB409 15GZ-2507 3b G E 14 G E 14-P 1 ODNAB406-16GZ-2508 144 60 3b 58 3a 3a 3b 3b 56 3a 3b 3a 3b 3b 54 1b 2b 3b 3a 3b 3a 52 2a 1b 2a 3a 3b 3b 3b 50 la 2b ib 1b 3a 3b 3b 3b 48 2a 1a 3a i b 2a 3b 3a 3b 46 1a 2a la 2b 1b 2b 3b 3a 44 2a 1a 2a 1a 2a 1 b 3a 3a 3b 42 1a 2b 1a 2a 1b 2a 3b 3b 3a 3b 40 2b 1a 2b 1a 2b 1b 1b 3b 3b 3a 38 1a 2b 1a 2b la 2a 1b 3b 3a 3b 36 2a 1a 2b 1a 2a 1a 1b 3a 3a 3b 34 1a 2b 2b 2b 1a 2a ib 3a 3a 3b 32 la 2b 2b 2b 1a 2a 1b 3a 3a 3b 30 2a 1a 2b 1a 2a la ib 3a 3a 3b 28 1a 2b la 2b 1a 2a 1b 3b 3a 3b 26 2b 1a 2b 1a 2b 1b 1 b 3b 3b 3a 24 1a 2b 1a 2a 1b 2a 3b 3b 3a 3b 22 2a 1a 2a 1a 2a 1 b 3a 3a 3b 20 la 2a 1a 2b tb 2b 3b 3a 18 2a 1a 3a 1 b 2a 3b 3a 3b 16 1a 2b 1b 1b 3a 3b 3b 3b 14 2a 1 b 2a 3a 3b 3b 3b 12 lb 2b 3b 3a 3b 3a 10 3a 3b 3a 3b 3b 8

3a 3a 3b 3b 6

3b 4

2

7 8 9 1011 121314 15 1617 lb la 2b 1b 2a lb lb 2a lb 2b 1a 3a 3a 3a 3b F1 3b 3a 3a 3a 3b 3a 3a 2a 2b 1b 2b 1b 3b 3a 2b 2a ib 1a 1a 2a 2b 1b 1b,2b 2a I lb lb 2b 2b lb 2b 2b 2b l b lb 2b 12a 1 b lb 2b 2b 1b la 2a 2b 1a 2a 3a 3a 3b la 1b 2a 2b 3a 3b 3b 3b 3b 3b 3b 3a 3a 3a 3a 3a 2a 2a 3a 3a 3a 2b 2a 2a 2b 2b 1a 1a la la 1a 1b 2a 1b 2a is 2b 1b 2a 1b 2b 1b 2a lb 2b 1b 2b ib 2b lb 2b lb 2b lb 2b 1b 2b Ib 2a lb 2b lb 2b 1b 2b 1b 2a 1b 2b lb 2b lb 2b 1b 2b 1b n2,1 2b 1b 1b 2b 1b 2b lb 2b Ib 2b 1b 2a 1b 2b 1b 2b 1b 2b lb 2b 1b 2b lb 2a 1b 2b lb 2b ib 2b ib 2b lb 2b lb 2b lb 2a l lb 2b la 2b lb 2a 1b to lb 2a lb 2a 2b la is la 1a 3a 2b 2a 2a 2b 3a 2a 2a 3a 3a 3b 3a 3a 3a 3a 3b 3b 3b 3b 3b 3a 3b 3a 3a 2b 2a 2a 1a 1a la 2a 1b 2b 2b 2b 1b 1b lb 2b 1b 2b 2b 2b 1b lb lb 2b 1b 1b lb lb 2b 3b 3a 2a 2a la 1a 2b 2b 1b 1b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 1b 2b 2-b 1 b lb 2b 2b 2b lb la la 2a 2a 2a 1a 2b 3a 3a 3a 3a 3b 3b 3b is 1a 2a 2a 3b 3b 3b e 2 Quad Cities 2 Cycle 18 - Reference Loading Pattern Page 10 o9' 24 1

3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 Designation L Bundle Type Bundle Name Number of BundIes Cycle Loaded la GE14 GE14-P10DNAB418-16GZ-2646 80 18 1b GE14 GE14-P10DNAB389-18GZ-2650 160 18 2a GE14 GE14-P10DNAB409-15GZ-2507 116 17 2b GE14 GE14-P10DNAB406-16GZ-2508 152 17 3a ATRIUM-9B SPCA9-3838-11GZN-ADV 136 16 3b ATRIUM-9B SPCA9-381 B-12GZL-ADV 80 16 1

2 3 4 5 6 1

2 3

4 3b 5

3a 3a 6

3b 3a 3a 7

3b 3a 3a 3a 8

3b 3a 3a 2a 9

3b 3a 2b 2a 10 3b 3a 3a 2b la 11 3b 3a 2a 2b 1a 1b 12 3b 3a 2a 2a is 2a 13 3b 3a 3a 2a 1a 1b 14 3b 3a 3a 2b 1a 2a 15 3b 3a 2a 1a 2a 1a 16 3b 3a 2a 1a 2a la 17 3b 3a 3a 2b 1a 2a 18 3b 3a 3a 2a la Ib 19 3b 3a 2a 2a la 2a 20 3b 3a 2a 2b 1a lb 21 3b 3a 3a 2b la 22 3b 3a 2b 2a 23 3b 3a 3a 2a 24 3b 3a 3a 3a 25 3b 3a 3a 26 3a 3a 27 3b 28 29 30 8192021 222324252627282930 3b 3b 3b 60 3a 3a 3a 3b 58 3a 2a u2a 3a 3b 3b 3b 56 2a 2a 2b 3a 3a 3a 3a 3b 54 1a la la 2b 2b 3a 3a 3a 3a 52 1b 2a 1b la 2a 2a 3a 3a 3a 3b 50 2a 1b 2b is Ib 2b is 2b 3a 3a 3a 3b 48 1b 2a tb 2b la 2b 1 a 2a 3a 3a 3b 46 2b Ib 2b lb 2a la 1b 2a 2b 3a 3b 44 1b 2b lb 2b lb 2b 1a la 2b 3a 3a 3b 42 2a 1b 2b 1b 2b tb Ib la 2b 2a 3a 3b 40 1b 2b 1b 2b lb 2a 2a 1a 2a 2a 3a 3b 38 2b ib 2a lb 2b Ib 2a 1 b l a 2a 3a 3a 3b 36 lb 2b 1b 2b lb 2b lb 2a la 2b 3a 3a 3b 34 2b lb 2a lb 2b Fib 1b 2b 2la la 2a la 2a 3a 3b 32 2b 1b 2a lb 2b 2a 1a 2a 3a 3b 30 lb 2b lb 2b ib 2b 1 b 2a l a 2b 3a 3a 3b 28 2b lb 2a 1b 2b Ib 2a lb la 2a 3a 3a 3b 26 1b 2b 1b 2b 1b 2, 1b 2a la 2a 2a 3a 3b 24 2a lb 2b 1b 2b 1b 2b 1b la 2b 2a 3a 3b 22 1b 2b 1b 2b 1b 2b l a l a 2b 3a 3a 3b 20 2b ib 2b lb 2a la lb 2a 2b 3a 3b 18 1b 2a 1b 2b la 2b 1a 2a 3a 3a 3b 16 2a lb 2b la lb 1a 2b 3a 3a 3a 3b 14 1b 2a 1b la 2a 2a 3a 3a 3a 3b 12 1a la 1a 2b 2b 3a 3a 3a 3a 10 2a 2a 2b 3a 3a 3a 3a 3b 8

3a 2a 2a 3a 3b 3b 3b 6

3a 3a 3a 3b 4

2

(I Cities Power Flow (Nominal Feedwater Temperature)

Page I I of 24 Figure 3 - Quad Cities Power Flow leap (Norninal Feedwater Temperature)

Figure 4 QC2 Cycle 19 SLMCPR Result Page 12 of 24

Figure 5 - Assembly Histograms Page 13 of 24

Figure 6 - Assembly Histograms

Figure 7 - Assembly Histograms

Figure 8 - Assembly Histograms

Figure 9 - Assembly Histograms

Figure 10 - Assembly Histograms

Figure 11 - Assembly Histograms

Figure 12 - Fuel Rod Histograms

istogmms Page 21 of 24 a, c a, c

14 - NO Rod Histograms

-Fuel Rod Histograms

Fi-ure 16 - Fuel Rod Histograms