NRC 2012-0012, Fitness for Duty Performance Data
| ML12055A062 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 02/23/2012 |
| From: | Jim Costedio Point Beach |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NRC 2012-0012 | |
| Download: ML12055A062 (11) | |
Text
February 23,2012 BEACH NRC 2012-0012 10 CFR 26.41 7 10 CFR 26.71 7 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Dockets 50-266 and 50-301 License Nos. DPR-24 and DPR-27 201 1 Fitness for Dutv Performance Data
Reference:
(1) NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, letter to NRC, dated February 25,201 1 201 0 Fitness for Duty Performance Data (MLI 10590429)
In accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 26.41 7 and 26.717 enclosed is the 201 1 Fitness-For-Duty (FFD) Program Performance Data for Point Beach Nuclear Plant. This submittal also contains the detailed information on the 201 0 fatigue assessment that was submitted via Reference 1.
This letter contains no new Regulatory Commitments and no revisions to existing Regulatory Commitments.
Very truly yours, NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC James Costedio Licensing Manager Enclosures cc:
Administrator, Region Ill, USNRC Project Manager, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, USNRC Resident Inspector, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, USNRC NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, 6610 Nuclear Road, Two Rivers, WI 54241
FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC Company Point Beach Nuclear Plant Location Donald C. Popp Contact Name 201 1 Annual Reporting Period (920) 755-7756 Phone Number Cutoffs: ScreenIConfirmation (nglml) & Alcohol (% BAC)
X 10 CFR 26 Levels identified in Sections 26.1 03 and 26.1 63 During the reporting period of 201 1, NextEra Energy Resources (NextEra) Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP) conducted 4,831 drug and alcohol tests in accordance with 10 CFR Part 26. Random test rates are as follows:
Testing Results Average number with Unescorted Access Total: 231 6 Categories Follow-up For Cause -
Observed Behavior For Cause -
Post Event Pre-Access Random Total Page 1 of 5 POOLS Point Beach Nuclear Plant Licensee Employees 690 Reporting Period 201 1 54%
Tested 19 1
2 58 394 474 Contractor Personnel 1626 Positive 0
0 0
0 1
1 Tested 169 "4
13 3303 868 4357 Positive 1
0 0
9 1
11
BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS Manaaement Actions For the reporting period of 201 1, twelve (12) workers were denied nuclear access after testing positive for drugs or alcohol. By test type, one (1) follow-up test was positive, two (2) random tests were positive, and nine (9) pre-access tests were positive.
12 1 Follow-ur, Positive Test Point Beach Licensee Employees Contractors Total One (1) contractor employee tested positive for alcohol. This individual was denied access.
opiates 1
0 1
Random Positive Test Marijuana 0
4 4
One (1) contractor employee tested positive for marijuana, and one (1) licensee employee tested positive for opiates. Both individuals were denied access.
Cocaine 0
0 0
Amphe-tamines 0
1 1
Pre-Access Positive Test One (1) contractor employee tested positive for amphetamines, three (3) contractor employees tested positive for marijuana, and five (5) contractor employees tested positive for alcohol. All individuals were denied access.
Phency-clidine 0
0 0
Additional Comments There were no subversion attempts during the 201 1 reporting period.
Alcohol 0
6 6
For the 201 1 reporting period, all blind specimens submitted to PBNP's HHS-certified laboratory yielded expected results.
Refusal to Test 0
0 0
- On February 3, 201 1, one (I) for-cause observed behavior (alcohol only) test was conducted on a contractor employee due to the smell of alcohol. The breath alcohol test was negative. No drug test was required, and the individual was allowed to go back to work in accordance with 1 OCFR26.77(b)(l).
On October 28, 201 1, a contractor employee received an OSHA recordable injury. They were taken off-site for medical treatment, and did not return to the site. A for-cause test was not able to be conducted. Incident entered into the site corrective action program.
Page 2 of 5
Reportable Events Point Beach Nuclear Plant had one (1) reportable event as defined in 10 CFR Part 26.719 during this reporting period. On April 22,201 1, at 1321 (CDT) a 24-hour reportable FFD event report (EN 46777) was made in accordance with 10 CFR 26.719(b)(2)(ii).
Page 3 of 5
m H o v -
Page 4 of 5
I I
I I
i 1 I
I 1 am&ion aWahw for hw3wu.a~
in Each catem-26203@)(1)~
1 lfhmmw obcan%c&e ~ctions-26.mxexr) 1 I
I 1
10 0
0 0
0 ham of Fatigue Assessment Data:
2 0
0 0
0 0
W e t ~ t h c 2 5 t ~ 1 Q a W S g u e ~ f o r ~, l n r r w e r e a W ~
3 0
0 0
0 0
z r N i s a c r s s s a a a r t o ~ M n g 1 M l.
1 n
n n
In n
1-PIovidedtoa I
I I
I I
I I
m a e * ~ ~ ~. t Q n d 2 4 ~ e s e s m & S ~ k ~ p 0 s t c N a n t W a v u p ingle Individual 0
1 _ ~ r f u ~ l s s y l g.
O ( l ) m 2 4 ~. 1 8 ~ ~ l ) m o c r t ~.
~uingorlka F
a
~
~
~
r 4
~
~
~
r r
~
~
)
U r
r
~
-t#me-aMs(**-,Mdole*
I I farpo post^^.
Page 5 of 5
ATTACHMENT 1 201 1 FATIGUE ASSESSMENT DETAILS The following are the details of fatigue assessment performed for "for cause" testing:
A maintenance contractor working outage hours was assigned to fill & vent transmitters. However, he did not show up to perform his duties. The individual made a decision to take a nap in a back room. A fatigue assessment was performed and the individual exhibited impairment and was required to take at least a 10 hour1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> break prior to returning to work.
An Engineer contractor supporting the power uprate outage activities, displayed uncharacteristic outbursts. The individual was relieved from his duties and a fatigue assessment was performed. It was determined that the individual exhibited impairment and was required to take at least a 10 hour1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> break prior to returning to work.
A maintenance contractor working outage hours standing fire watch was observed with his head down and his eyes closed. The individual was relieved from his duties and a fatigue assessment was performed. It was determined that the individual exhibited impairment and was required to take at least a 10 hour1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> break prior to returning to work.
A Security officer working outage hours performing compensatory measures at a vital area door was observed as inattentive during post switch. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual exhibited impairment and was required to take at least a 10 hour1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> break prior to returning to work.
A maintenance individual performing outage activities was injured while checking and clearing a cart path. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A Security officer working online hours was performing gatehouse duties and was questioned by coworker who thought the officer looked tired. The Security officer stated that he was not tired, but was taking prescribed pain medication. A fatigue assessment was performed where it was determined the officer did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A maintenance contractor performing outage duties injured his hand while reinstalling grating. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A maintenance contractor working outage hours was sitting in a chair waiting to perform a walkdown. A security officer noticed the individual with his eyes closed, but stated the individual became alert during a plant announcement. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
Page 1 of 3 A maintenance contractor performing outage duties operating a forklift struck a cable tray support with the forklift. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A maintenance contractor performing outage duties as a spotter for a forklift operator did not prevent the forklift operator from striking a cable tray support with the forklift. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
The following are the details of fatigue assessment performed for "post event follow-up":
A maintenance contractor performing outage duties injured his thumb when he was hammering and grinding. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A maintenance contractor performing outage duties rigging and moving equipment experienced an industrial safety near miss when a rigging hook snagged a piece of equipment knocking it over and almost hitting the individual. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A maintenance contractor performing outage duties moving a feed pump via a powered saddle roller experienced an industrial safety near miss when a piece of equipment fell. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A maintenance contractor performing outage duties experienced an industrial safety near miss when a crate fell from a fork lift. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A maintenance contractor performing outage duties as a crane operator experienced an incident where the manipulator crane he was cooperating came into contact with the polar crane cable. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A maintenance contractor performing outage duties as the spotter for the manipulator crane operator that experienced an incident where the manipulator crane he was spotting came into contact with the polar crane cable. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A maintenance contractor working online hours lowered a garage door onto the back of a maintenance vehicle bumper causing damage. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
Page 2 of 3 A security officer working online hours was performing a vehicle search when he stepped off the truck trailer and fell injuring his arms. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A supply chain individual working online hours was removing a muskrat from a warehouse and was bitten by the animal. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A maintenance employee performing outage duties removing an upper end bell from lube oil cooler, the hook became disengaged and the end bell dropped injuring the workers hand. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A maintenance employee working online hours conducting a work package walk down injured himself when he touched a hot pipe. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A maintenance contractor performing pre-outage activities performing scaffolding activities experienced an industrial safety near miss. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A maintenance contractor, performing pre-outage activities performing scaffolding activities experienced an industrial safety near miss. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A maintenance contractor supervisor performing outage duties moving plant equipment was involved in an industrial safety near miss. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
Page 3 of 3
ATTACHMENT 2 2010 FATIGUE ASSESSMENT DETAILS The following are the details of fatigue assessment performed for "for cause" testing:
A maintenance contract supervisor working online hours keeping logs was found sleeping by security. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual exhibited impairment and was required to take at least a 10 hour1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> break prior to returning to work.
A security officer working online hours performing vehicle searches was involved in an industrial safety near safety miss. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
The following are the details of fatigue assessment performed for "post event follow-up":
A security officer working online hours performing routing security activities fell and was injured. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A contract warehouse supervisor working online hours was involved in a minor vehicle accident. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A maintenance contractor working online hours was involved in a minor vehicle accident. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A maintenance contractor, working online hours, was involved in a minor vehicle accident. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A radiation protection worker working outage duties performing surveys cut his finger. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A maintenance contractor working outage hours performing electrical duties pulling wire when an unprotected end of wire came in contact with a bare terminal. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A site operator working online hours performing field duties injured his finger. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
Page 1 of 2 A maintenance worker working online hours damaged equipment while unloading a truck. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A maintenance contractor working online hours driving a platform lift, hit and bent a switch. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A maintenance worker working line hours snow plowing bumped a step to a platform in the switchyard. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
A maintenance worker working online hours cut his finger while working on a grinder. A fatigue assessment was performed and was determined that the individual did not exhibit impairment due to fatigue.
The following are the details of fatigue assessment performed for a self-declaration:
A security officer working online hours training when he stated he was tired and did not sleep well. The individual appeared drowsy. A fatigue assessment was performed and determined the individual exhibited impairment and was required a break of at least 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> prior to returning to work.
Page 2 of 2