ML20234E852

Advises That Work Under Contract AT(49-5)2667 for Bodega Bay Reactor Not Anticipated.Max Number of Days Firm May Devote to Malibu Project Increased from 10 to 20 Days

ML20234E852
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, Bodega Bay, 05000214
Issue date:	12/09/1964
From:	Case E US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:	Newmark N NATHAN M. NEWMARK CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES
Shared Package
ML20234A767	List: IA-85-665, Discusses Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants,Including Const of Nuclear Plants in Seismically Active Zones ML20234A761 ML20234A769 ML20234A792 ML20234A798 ML20234A803 ML20234A812 ML20234A816 ML20234A827 ML20234A830 ML20234A838 ML20234A841 ML20234A844 ML20234A847 ML20234A851 ML20234A855 ML20234A858 ML20234A861 ML20234A864 ML20234A868 ML20234A871 ML20234A874 ML20234A893 ML20234A896 ML20234A900 ML20234A911 ML20234A922 ML20234A929 ML20234A932 ML20234A937 ML20234A944 ML20234A956 ML20234A965 ML20234A968 ML20234A976 ML20234A984 ML20234A993 ML20234A996 ML20234A999 ML20234B005 ML20234B008 ML20234B023 ML20234B032 ML20234B035 ML20234B040 ML20234B062 ML20234B066 ML20234B076 ML20234B084 ML20234B098 ... further results
References
FOIA-85-665 NUDOCS 8709220546
Download: ML20234E852 (2)

Text

. . . . _ _ _ _ . _ _

December 9,196h

-JGl~

~

74Cf -

~

Dr. Nathan M. Newmark 111 Talbot Laboratory Urbana, Illinois

Dear Dr. Newmark :

This refers to your letter of October 19,196k concerniug your work <m various reactor projects under Contract No.

AT(h9-5)2667. With regard to the Bodega Bay reactor it is not anticipated that any more work on the part of your firm vill be necessary on this case. In connection with the Malibu reactor it is not possible at this point to con-

= fidently predict the additional work on your part which may be required. However, it seems likely that the 10 days previously authorized by rny letter of September 3 may not be sufficient. Accordingly, the maximum number of days that your firm may devote to this project is increased from 10 to 20 days.

Sincerely yours ,

Onginal Signed by L G. Case Edson G. Case Assistant Director Division of Beactor Licensing k 2[h6851217 FIRESTOB5-665 PDR r

omer > .

OGC _, , , . [ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , _ , , , _ , , .

SURNAME > 30 ?aS e.;bh__, , . . , 1.bb,,Eh[

8 . . , , , , , , , , ,,,

carr > .12./9 /6 h .j se.e.me.vipus con.gre,nces ) , ,, __ ,,,,, , , , , , , , .,

twnn uc-ais mn. vm ...............,,o im. i ..

s.g j C s .,12 7 6 "A

Dr. Nathan M. Newmark 111 Talbot Laboratory i

Urbana, Illinois i Dear Dr. Newmark \

\ l

' Ibis nfers to your 1 tter 9 of October 19, 1964 concerning your work on various reactdk projects under Contract No. AT(h9-5)2667.

With regard to the Bodega Bay reactor it is not anticipated that any more work on the part of your firm vill be necessary on this cas e. In connection with the Halibu reactor it is not pocsible at this point to confidently predict the additionsi vork on your part which may be required. : However, it seems likely that the 10 days previoasly authorized by aty letter of September 3 may not be sufficient. Accordingly, the mar.imum number of days that your firm may devote to this project is increased from 10 to ,

l 20 days.

We believe that there is merit t'o your suggestion that consid-eration be given to authorization., of a study by your firm for l

the purpose of outlining in a definitive way general earthque.ke resistant design provisions for reactors. We vould like to be provided with a discussion of your Auggested method of approach, an outline of the scope of the proped study, and a preliminary estimate of the time and effort invoi d. For the purpose of this exploratory wort, your firm is a orized to spend five days on this phase of the proposed stu .

Sincerely curs ,

Edson G. Case Assistant Director '

Division of Reactor Licensing l n omcc> .. > fl ' . .

. . -. 0G[ .., .. N.. . . . . . .. .. ..._ . .

SURNAME > ,,, f ,, , , , , , , , , , , , , . , ,

onc> 11M3 /6h 12/ 3 /6L 1] / /6h num ac.m m... . m ...................,e. i._w.i ..

~~

l u______--_ -- -- _ -- - - - - - -