ML20211G878
| ML20211G878 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/03/1986 |
| From: | Hawkins E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Themelis J ENERGY, DEPT. OF |
| References | |
| REF-WM-48 NUDOCS 8606200234 | |
| Download: ML20211G878 (2) | |
Text
.
1 DISTRIBUTION Docket; File WM-48
-PDR/DCS:
DBangart, RIV WM-48/RFB/TT0/86/05/30/0 RBrich T01sen HRose PGarcia M 0 3 1986 EHawkins LLW Branch, WMLU URF0 r/f URF0:RFB Docket No. WM-48 040WM48501E John G. Themelis, Project Manager Uranium Mill Tailings Project Office U.S. Department of Energy Albuquerque Operations Office P.O. Box 5400 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115
Dear Mr. Themelis:
Staff, review of the transmittal entitled " Responses to NRC Comments on the Draft -Remedial Action Plan for Durango, Colorado Site,' February 25, 1986," has been completed. Enclosed for your review is an evaluation of the comment responses. Where no evaluation is offered, the response was determined to be acceptable and to accurately address the specific item of concern.
(
Should you have any questions, please contact either Randy Brich on FTS 776-2811 or me.
Sincerely, crt;: 5r:1 E!md "r r y;y.-c:. L yo w n Edward F. Hawkins, Chief Licensing Branch 2 Uranium Recovery Field Office Region IV
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
J. Oldham, M-K P. Ferraro, Colorado Department of Health Case Closed:
040WM48501E l
8606200234 860603 PDR WASTE WM-48 PDR j
1
__ __: ___ [f__[URF M__.;___1_:_URF0 0FC :URF0 d
- NAME :RBrich
._____:______/_1v:T0 n
- EHawkins DATE :86/06/03
- 6/jp 3
?
~
m ENCLOSURE Evaluation and Responses to NRC Comments Durango DRAP Comment
- 10. DOE stated that a thorough discussion of ground-water contamination within the Menefee and Point Lookout formations together with a plan of restoration / remedial action alternatives for the site will be included in the Final RAP.
This will be an acceptable format for addressing comment number 10.
The issues of concern will need to be addressed in the Final RAP and NRC will conduct a comprehensive review for the specific items noted in the initial comments of the Draft RAP. All items of concern will be reviewed for adequacy and completeness at the time DOE issues-the Final RAP for review.
- 21. This response is not acceptable and does not address the original comment pertaining to a lack of test data and information on swell and dispersivity of on-site soils. Additional testing should be implemented to characterize the on-site soil properties. Adequate i
data on soils can only be acquired through a soil testing.
- Further, the bid documents do not indicate that any new testing has been initiated; so no new data is available for soil property characterization.
i L..