ML20207P781
| ML20207P781 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 01/02/1987 |
| From: | Selman M CONSOLIDATED EDISON CO. OF NEW YORK, INC. |
| To: | Ebneter S NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8701200210 | |
| Download: ML20207P781 (3) | |
Text
m-
- Ja h
'. W Selmen Mce Premdent Consoklated Edison Cornpeny of New York, Inc.
Indian Point Station Broadway & Bioakley Avenue f
Buchanan, NY 10511 Telephone (914) 737-8116 January 2, 1987 Mr. Stewart D. Ebneter, Director Division of Reactor Safety U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pa. -19406 Re:
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Indian Point Unit No. 2 Docket No. 50-247 Dear Mr. Ebneter This refers to the special operational safety inspection conducted by a team of NRC personnel led by Mr. Jon Johnson of your office on-July 21, 1986 through August 1, 1986, at the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station Unit No.
2, and the subsequent conversations between Mr. Johnson and Con Edison staff on November 19, 1986.
Attachment A to this letter transmits additional information that Mr. Johnson requested.
If you or your staff have any questions, please contact us.
Very truly yours, kGe^
attachment cc Mr. Jon Johnson Division of Reactor Safety U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pa.
19406 Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cornmission P.O. Box 38 Buchanan, NY 10511 3701200210 870102 PDR ADOCK 05000247.
IC O 1) {
i G
PDR m
Or.
i-
,l
.g
.~
January 2,-1987
. Re :. Indian Point Unit No.=2 Docket No. 50-247 ATTACHMENT A 1.
In our response to Violation A, we stated that we believed that the lack of a procedure on the loss of 138 KV offsite power was not in noncompliance with Technical Specification 6. 8.1 '.
Based on further review we concur with you that if no procedure existed on the loss of 138 KV offsite power that would be in noncompliance with Technical Specification 6.8.1.
We stated that such a procedure, addressing the loss of 138 KV offsite power, would be issued by December 15, 1986.
Procedure A27.1.1 Rev.
O, titled " Loss of 138KV" was issued with an effective date of December 12, 1986.
As stated in our earlier response to Violation A, the concerns raised by.the inspection team with regard to the procedures referenced in Violation A have been promptly acted upon.-
Con Edison previously committed to submit to the NRC a revised EOP Procedures Generation Package by February 15, 1987.
This revision better defines the EOP -
generation and maintenance process to facilitate changes on a more routine basis.
In addition, Con Edison has purchased a computerized EOP maintenance program to better facilitate the processing of required changes to the EOPs.
This will reduce the manual effort involved in maintaining many of the controlling documents.
This program is scheduled to be implemented during the-first half of 1987.
2.
To ensure that containment closecut activities are performed in an acceptable manner, a containment closecut check-off list has been developed and is under final review.
This check-off list will be issued by January 30, 1987. This check-off list will ensure that the containment is left in an acceptable condition.
This check-off list
- requires, among other things, that the individual inspect the recirculation sump grating and floor plate to assure that the as-left configuration is in accordance with the Indian Point Unit 2 Final Safety Analysis Report, Section 6.2, and the Containment Building General Arrangement Drawing No. 9321-F-2503, Rev. 15, 3.
In our response to Violation C, we stated that Station Administrative Order (SAO) No. 218, entitled " Housekeeping", is being revised to give i-i more detailed and improved control of areas of responsibility by l
redistribution of areas within normal work disciplines.
That SAO j
revision is in final review and will be issued this month.
A l
housekeeping guide was published in November, 1986.
This guide has been prepared to assist all Indian Point personnel in maintaining Indian Point Unit 2 cleanliness standards at the highest levels. The i
4 m
January 2, 1987 Re Indian Point Unit No.'2 Docket No. 50-247 sub'equent guide has been issued to maintenance personnel and s
distributions will be made to other personnel.
The station has been divided into separate cleanliness areas and i
personnel have been assigned responsibility for these areas.
Signs have been-posted in these areas with the name of the individual who has the responsibility to ensure that housekeeping standards are-maintained.
These areas are routinely inspected by management personnel. If any housekeeping deficiencies arise, that individual is contacted to correct the deficiency. Weekly housekeeping meetings are i
held with section representatives to discuss.the housekeeping condition of those areas assigned to them.
In addition, Maintenance supervisors inspect maintenance work areas to 2
i ensure' that post-maintenance restoration of the area and or equipment is acceptable.
i i
3 f
4 i
s 1
1 4
)
i t
r -- - - --- - -
- -, - -,, - --r---
.---,-,.~~-,+--,-,,+e,
-e,-
-r-r-=+-,-e v - -- -,-,~-
--me----
---e-
--w----
y e--=-
-