ML20202J672
| ML20202J672 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/21/1997 |
| From: | Lohaus P NRC OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS (OSP) |
| To: | Cardwell C TEXAS, STATE OF |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20202J675 | List: |
| References | |
| SP-96-027, SP-96-27, NUDOCS 9712110214 | |
| Download: ML20202J672 (4) | |
Text
- O s t HOV 21 193
, Ms. Cynthia Cardwell, Branch Administrotor h
=
Regulations and Standards M Texas Bureau of Radiation Control &
1100 West 49th Street Austin, TX 78756-3189 l5 q
Dear Ms. Cardwell:
2 As requested, we have reviewed the proposed Texas regulations in 6S289.201,289.202, 289.252, 289.257, and 289.260. The regulations were reviewed by comparison to the -)
equivalent NRC regulations in 10 CFR Parts 20,30,40, and 71. We also discussed our review $
of the regulations with Ms. Monica Gonzales on November 5,1997. I As a result of our review we have two comments that have been identified in the enclosure Please note that we have limited our review to regulations required for compatibility and/or health and safety. Under our current procedure, a finding that a State regulation meets the compatibility and health and safety categories of the equivalent NRC regulation may only be made based on a review of the final State regulation. However, we have determined that if your proposed regulations were adopted incorporating the comments, as appropriate, and without other significant change, they would meet the compatibility and health and safety categories established in OSP Intemal Procedure B.7.
We request that when the proposed regulations are adopted and published as final regulations, a copy of the "as published" regulations be provided to us for review. As requested in our All Agreement States Letter SP-96-027, "Reauest to Hichlicht Changes to Aareement State -
Regplations Submitted to NRC for Comoatib"ity Review" (March 1,1996), please highlight the final changes and send one copy in a computer readable format, if oossible.
-Y If you have any questions regarding the comments or any of the NRC regulations used in the review, please contact me or Mr. Richard Blanton of my staff at (301) 415-2322, or by Intemet at RLB@NRC. GOV.
P*
% o Sincerely,
$ - B.
PAULH.LOHAUS W' ~
Paul H. Lohaus, Deputy Director
$21y 1 Off ce of State Programs I cv PDR
\
- I[G As stated.k
Enclosure:
h Diskibution ll*****
ll llllllllffllll kMDIR
- RF (7S277) * .
SDroggitis - DCD (SP08)
- (' C JHomor, RIV PDR(YES_fL NO ) $
}j7[]g SSalomon DOCUMENT NAME: G:\RLB\TX97S277.WPC, To reeuwe a corr of this document, indicate in the tor: W:opy yecut attachmenvenciosure \ n T = coar wei attacnm revepcsosure "N" = No cooy OFFICE OSP O @l$Q OGC "
i (IS,%D NAME RLBlanton:nb,])(1 PHLbha& \ FXCameron RLBangart DATE 11!n/97MP 'i1/ l/97 11/l h/97 11/J(/97 :
- f7/MO Z/ Y WA Y OSP FILE CODE: SP-AG-27< h i
25 w~ ..
a clou g y & UNITED STATES g } NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o, 8 WASHINGTON, D.C. 30666-0001
$9 * . . . . ,o#,
November 21, 1997 Ms. Cynthia Cardwell, Branch Administrator Regulations and Standards Texas Bureau of Radiation Control 1100 West 49th Street Austin, TX 78756-3189
Dear Ms. Cardwell:
As requeted, we have reviewed the proposed Texas regulations in 69289.201,289.202, 289.252,289.257, and 289.260. The regulations were reviewed by comparison to the equivalent NRC regulations in 10 CFR Parts 20,30,40, and 71. We also discussed our review i of the regulations with Ms. Monica Gon ales on November 5,1997.
As a result of our review we have two comments that i. ave been identified in the enclosure.
Please note that we have limited our review to regulations required for compatibility and/or health and safety. Under our current procedure, a finding that a State regulation meets the compatibility and health and safety categories of the equivalent NRC regulation may only be made based on a review of the firial State regulation. However, we have determined that if your proposed regulations were adopted incorporating the comments, as appropriate, and without other significant change, they would meet the compatibility and health and safety categories established in OSP Intemal Procedure 8.7, We request that when the proposed regulations are adopted and publisher' as final regulations, a copy of the "as published
- regulations be provided to us for review. As requested in our All Agreement States Letter SP-96-027, "Reauest to Hichlicht Chanaes to Aareement State Reaulations Submitted to NRC for Comoatibility Review" (March 1,1996), please highlight the final changes and send one copy in a computer readable format, if possible.
If you have any questions regarding the comments or any of the NRC regulations used in the review, please contact me or Mr. Richard Blanton of my staff at (301) 415-2322, or by Intemet at RLB@NRC. GOV.
Si rely, 11 lab H. Loha s, Deputy Dir c Office of State Programs
Enclosure:
As stated
COMMENTS ON PROPOSED TEXAS RE2ULATIONS
.! AGAINST COMPATIBILITY AND HEALTH AND SAFETY CATEGORIES State NRC NRC-Approved Catenory Regulation Regulation SSR fif any) Sublect and Comment B 289.257(f)(2) 71.10(b) -
General license: NRC-approved package.
Text equivalent to 10 CFR 71.10(b)(3) is missing.
This provision needs to be adopted in order to assure consistent regulation of sources shipped in interstate commerce.
B 289.257(g)(2) 71.13(b)(1) -
Previously approved package.
In 289.257(g)(2)(B)(,), the date ' April 1,1996,"
needs to be changed to " April 1,1999." This provision needs to be adopted in order to assure consistent regulation of materials shipped in interstate commerce.
J
}
I i
i s
a 4
_ j --------__ ;,--- --
EXECUTIVE
~~~~~~~
TASK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
<<< PRINT SCREEN UPDATE FORM >>>
TASK # - 7S277 z ---
- ---" DATE- 10/14/97 --
MAIL CTRL. - 1997 TASK STARTED - 10/14/97 TASK DUE - 11/04/97 TASK COMPLETED -
~~ . ..... ...
/ /
.~~~~~~
TASK DESCRIPTION
- REVIEW TX REGULATIONS FOR 10 CFR PART 30, 40 AND 71 REQUESTING
.-~~~
OFF. - TX REQUESTER
- CARDWELL WITS
- 0 FYP - N PROG.- RLB PERSON -
STAFF ... LEAD - RLB PROG. AREA -
. .-~~
PROJECT STATUS - TX DUE DATE: 11/4/97 d
PLANNED ACC. -
N
. LEVEL CODE - 1 s'
.)