ML20202F732
| ML20202F732 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 12/02/1997 |
| From: | Wiggins E NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Lofy R PARAMETER, INC. |
| References | |
| CON-FIN-J-2407-8, CON-NRC-03-93-026, CON-NRC-3-93-26 NUDOCS 9712090213 | |
| Download: ML20202F732 (6) | |
Text
INI Mf
)
e psEU%<
g%- / S(,f t
UNITED STATES 3
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION e
$k wassiwavow, o.c. nouwoot
\\.,,,
N9V 2 6 1997 1
Parameter, Inc.
Attn: Richard A. Lofy 13380 Watertown Plank roed Elm Grove, WI 53122
SUBJECT:
TASK ORDER NO.135, ENTITLED, 'WATERFORD SSEl" Under Contract No.
NRC-03-93 026
Dear Mr. Lofy:
In accordance with Scction G.4, Ian Order Procedyrca, of the subject contract, this letter definitizes the subject task order. The effort shall be performed in accordance with the enclosed Statement of Work and the Contractor's technical proposal dated November 18,1997. Additionally, t
this letter confirms verbal authorization provided to Mr. Richard Lofy, on November 18,1997, to begin worn on Task Order No.135.
Task Order No.135 shall be la effect from November 18,19977 through January 9,1998 with a cost ceiling of $33,779.39. The amount of $32,800.60 represents the estimated reimbursable costs, the amount of $93.28 represents the facilities capital cost of money, and the amount of $885.52 represents the fixed fee.
Accounting data for Task Order No.135 are as follows:
B & R N o.:
82015112028 Job Code:
J 2407-8 BOC:
252A R F P A N o.:
NRC-03 93-026 dtd 10/30/97, REV 11/18/97 A P P N N o.:
31X0200.820 Oblig. Amt.:
$33,779.39 The following individual is considered to be essential to the successful performance for work hereunder: Mr. Haywood S. Anderson. The Contractor agrees that such personnel shall not be removed from the effort under the task order without compliance with Contract Clause H.4,1ey EcfS0nael.
The issuance of this task order does not amend any terms or conditions of the subject contract.
T) ll o@
451Nt]IlJIJR!Eli e
9712090213I71202 PDR CONTR
. PDM NRC-03-93-0,26 g
_ _ _ _ _. _ _. _ = -.. _ _ _ _. _ _ _. -. - _ _. _. _ _. _ _. - - _ _ _ _. _. _ _ - _
[
Your contacts during the course of this task order are:
Technical Matters:
Armando Masciantonio Project Officer (301)415-1290-l Linda Smith Technical Monitor, Region IV -
(817) 860-8137 l
Contractual Matters:
Mona Se' den I
Contract Specialist (301) 415-6590-Acceptance of Task Order No.135 should be made by having an official, authorized to bind your organization, execute three copies of this document in the space provided and retum two copies l
fo the Contract Specialist at the address below. You should retain the third copy for your records.
{
Sincerely, 4
lQ
)?
Elois J. Wiggins, C9 ing Officer Contract Managem Br No.2 Division of Contracts and -
Property Management Office of Administration
Enclosure:
Statement of Work i
ACCEPTED: T s er No.- 135 1
NAME U
c_)
?
\\ (t af TITLE
,4/97 DATE
-t
,b
0 CONT RACT NRC-03-93-026 Parameter, Inc.
31 ATEMENT OF WORK Task Order 135 Revision 1 TITLE: Waterford Safety System Engineering Inspection (SSEI)
DOCKET NUMBER: 50 382 D&R NUMBER: 820-1511-12 28 JOB CODE: J-2407 NRC PROJECT OFFICER: A. S. Masciantonio, NRR (301) 415-1290 TECHNICAL MONITOR:
Linda Smith, R!V (817) 860-8137 PERFORMANCE PERIOD: November 18.1997 - January 9,1998 BACKGROUND A Safety Systcm Engineering Inspection (SSEI) will be conducted at the Waterford nuclear plant near New Orleans, i.A. The SSEI will assess the operational performance capability of selected safety system (s) through an in-depth, aiutti-disciplinary roview to veri,y that the system is capable of performing its intended safety function. The inspection will also verify completed actions for segulatory committments that the licentee made in conjunction with the safety systems. R' view of safety systems is to be performed in accordan e with NRC Inspection Procedure 93809 for a Safety System Engineering Inspection (SSL ).
QBJECTIVE The objective of this task order is to obtain expert technical assistance in the areas of mechanical design. The specialist is needed to assist the NRC inspection team in ? 3 prformance of the SSEl. The mechanical specialist should primarily have a m,Jn background, such as from an architect-engineer firm with experience in system design
.equirements and calculation. The specialist should also be familiar with installation and surveillance testing of equipment along with cognizance of how site engineering and operations organizations function. The specialist should be thoroughly familiar with NRC regulations and in':pection methodology. Also, the specialists should be familiar with the regulatory process, and should be able to develop a list of regulatory commitments from docketed licensee correspondence for the plant system (s) selected for review. The specialist will then be required to verify irrplementation of the licensce's coinmitments.
It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to assign technical staff, employees, and subcontractors, who have the required educational background, experience, or combination thereof, to rneet both the technical and regulatory objectives of the work specified in this Sta'ement Of Work (SOW). The NRC will rely on representrion made by the contractor wnceming the qualifications of the personnel proposed for assignment to this task order including assurance that all information contained in the technical and cost proposals, including resumes and conflict of interest disclosures, is accurate and truthful.
WORK REQUIREMENTSMD SCHEDULE The work specified in this SOW falls within Section C.3 of the basic contract's SOW. The contractor shall provide the qualified specialist, and the necessary facilities, materials, and services to assist the NRC staff in preparing for, conducting, and documenting the inspection activities and findings. The Tcchnical Monitor for this task is Linda Smith. The Technical Monitor may issue technicalinstructions from time to time during the duration of this task' order.
Technical instructions must be within the general statement of work stated in this task order and shall not constitute new assignments of work or changes of such nature as to justify an adjustment in cost or period of performance. The contractor shall refer to section G.1 of the basic contarct for further information and guidance on any technical directions issued under this task order.
Any modifications to the scope of work, cost or period of performance of this task order must be issued by the Contracting Officer and will be coordinated with the NRR Project Officer. Specific tasks under this task order are:
Ialk Schedule Comotelion 1.
Develop a list of regulatory Insoection preparation will take place commitments for the selected plant November 19 - 21,1997, at the Region IV system (s) based upon a review of o ices in Arlington, TX, and continue at docketed information. Prepare an the contractor's home office on November inspection plan and obtain a thorough 24 and 25,1997, understanding of the selected system (s).
2 Perform the inspection.
On site inspection is to take place on December 1 -5 and December 15 - 19, 1997, at the Waterford site, with one week of intervening review, December 8 - 12, 1997, at the contractcts' home offices.
3.
Prepare the inspection report.
Documentation of inspection will take place during the period of December 29, 1997 - January 7,1998, at the contractors' home offices. Finalispection report input is due January 7,1998.
NOTE: Prior to the start of on-site preparation, the contractor's staff is required to be available to coordinate inspection aspects, such as travel logistics, with the Team Leader.
REPORT REQUIREMENTS IshmcalRepod At the completion of Task 1, the contractor's specialist shall provide an inspection plan to the 2
NRC Team Leader. The format and scope of this input shall be as directed by the NRC Team Leader.
During Task 2, the contractor's specialist shall provide daily reports to the NRC Team Leader.
The format and scope of this report shall be as directed by the NRC Team Leader.
At the completion of Task 2 (prior to the inspection team's exit meeting with the licensee), the contractor's specialist shall provide a draft inspection report input to the NRC Team Leader.
The format and scope shall be as directed by the NRC Team Leader. Typically, this input will consist of a handwritten summary of the specialist's inspection findings.
At the completion of Task 3, the contractor shall deliver the final inspection report input (feeder report) to the NRC Project Officer (original and one copy) with one hard copy and one computer diskette version (Wordperfect 5.1 or other IBM PC compatible software acceptable to the NRC Team Leader) to the NRC Team Leader. The format and scope of the final report inputs shall be as directed by the NRC Team Leader.
A specialist's feeder report will serve as documentation of the specialist's inspection activities, effort, and findings, and will be used by the NRC Team Leader for the preparation of the NRC's inspection report. The form and score of the final tr* ~
- input shall be as provided by the NRC Team Leader. As a minimum, each specialist's repce P,,ut shallinclude the following:
Identity of the individuals (name, company, and title) that provided information to the specialist during the inspection.
For each area inspected, a description of the activities an d general findings and conclusions reached regarding the adequacy of the area.
For each area with a concern or findings, a discussion of the concerns or findings with technical bases.
NOTE: The contractor is not required to undertake any further efforts toward report finalization.
For example, management review of the feeder report beyond its submittal to the NRC Team Leader and Project Manager is not needed.
BusiDns LetteLRepJH1 The contractor shall provide monthly progress reports in accordance with the requirements of the basic contract.
MEEI1NGSAND TRAVEL For estimating purposes, the following meetings and travel are anticipated:
One, one-person. 3-day trip to the Region IV offices in Arlington TX, to prepare for the inspection (November 10 - 21, 1997).
3
i Two, one person,5-day trips to the plant site near New Orleans LA to conduct the inspection (December 1 -5 and December 15 - 19,1997).
- The contractors staff shall coordinate all travel arrangements in advance with the NRC Team Leader.
j ESTIMATED LEVEL OF EFFORT i
HumbeI Digipline Hours 1
Mechanical Design Specialist 226 The estimated level of effort for each specialist consists of 46 hours5.324074e-4 days <br />0.0128 hours <br />7.60582e-5 weeks <br />1.7503e-5 months <br /> for inspection preparation, 140 hours0.00162 days <br />0.0389 hours <br />2.314815e-4 weeks <br />5.327e-5 months <br /> for on site inspection and review, and 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> for inspection documentation.
NRC FURNISHED MATERIAL Documents required to prepare for the inspection will be provided by the NRC Team Leader.
OTHER APPLICABLE INFORMATIO.N The work specified in this SOW is 100% licensee fee recoverable. The contractor shall provide fee recovery information in the monthly progress reports in accordance with the requirements of the basic contract.
The contractors specialist assigned to this task cider will have to be badged for unescorted access privilege at the plant site. The contractor shall provide all documentation required for badging (as identified by the NRC Team Leader) at the plant site. Questions concerning badging and the plant site access shall be addressed to the NRC Technical Monitor.
1 4-
..... =..
_ __