ML20126A752

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to 840627 Action Filed Per 10CFR2.206 Re Implementation of Proceedings to Modify,Suspend or Revoke CPs for Facilities & to Take Action on Violations of App B to 10CFR50.Directors Decision 85-9 Encl
ML20126A752
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/04/1985
From: Taylor J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To: Guild R
GUILD, R.
Shared Package
ML20126A754 List:
References
2.206, DD-85-09, NUDOCS 8506130458
Download: ML20126A752 (2)


Text

<

DC S k

UNITED STNTES Ab 8 ' 3.#, (

t NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

  • ^-

1 WASHING TON, 'D. C. 20555 h

' Q'"' l gyy Docket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414 (10 CFR 2.206)

Robert Guild, Esq.

P.O. Box 12097 Charleston, South Carolina 29412

Dear Mr. Guild:

This is in response to your request for action filed pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206 on June 27, 1984, in which you asked the Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement, to institute proceedings to modify, suspend, or revoke the construction permits for Duke Power Company's Catawba Nuclear Station and to take other appropriate action on the basis of violations of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and instances of harassment and intimidation of quality control inspectors. My decision in this matter was delayed as a result of a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Brown and Root, Inc. v. Donovan, which was directly related to some of the issues raised by your request. My decision was then further delayed to allow time to evaluate a letter filed by Duke Power Company on April 22, 1985 in response to an

" Enforcement Action Request" which had previously been filed by the Government Accountability Project and which concerned tl.e same issue of enforcement action raised in your request.

For the reasons stated in the enclosed " Director's Decision under 10 CFR 2.206," your request has been granted in part and denied in part.

A copy of this decision will be filed with the Secretary of the Commission for its review in accordance with 10 CFR 2.206(c) of the Commission's regulations. As provided by this regulation, the decision will constitute the final action of the Commission 25 days after the date of issuance of the decision unless the Commission, on its own motion, institutes a review of the decision within that time.

A copy of the notice, which is being filed with the Office of the Federal Register for publication, is also enclosed.

Sincerely, d ' /-

....sn ~

J es M. Tay)

, Director ffice of I pection and Enforcement

Enclosure:

As stated cc:

Duke Power Company J. Michael McGarry, III, Esq.

Bishop Liberman, Cook, Purcell, and Reynolds 8506130458 850604 PDR ADOCK 05000413 P

PDR

JUN 0 41985 Robert Guild, Esq.

Distribution PDR LPDR

  • SECY
  • 0GC
  • JLieberman, ELD JTaylor, IE JAxelrad. IE JNGrace, RII GCunningham, ELD HDenton, NRR DEisenhut, NRR GHoller, IE SBurns ELD ES File EA File George Johnson, ELD Bluebag to the above, t

eu t

$. ' $ W' 4 t' en R11 Y/

ff k

IE:ESI?

ELD p i IE:DD I

T t

EHoller' JLieberman JNGrace Trad RVollmer 4 [pl r J

i 4/ 2/85

/ /85

/85 4/Ie/85 4/ ///85

/ /85

/