ML20101B625
| ML20101B625 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | FitzPatrick  |
| Issue date: | 05/11/1992 |
| From: | Boehlert S HOUSE OF REP. |
| To: | Rathbun D NRC OFFICE OF CONGRESSIONAL AFFAIRS (OCA) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20101B628 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9206040233 | |
| Download: ML20101B625 (3) | |
Text
"E 3*0N0 'O SHEnWOOD BOEHLERT JSYn OttitsCT 4p4 Voss
'~
- steenmotom opsat 5/
.. t,2 7 LONGWOa7H NOutt 0881CE tuitDaNt.
[
$t.5%Ct S 4 % ttCMMOL005 0
36 m/ tic WOnt?.MD TRANSF0mf atiom SELECT COWwP88 % AGineQ Canta.t ossect C
AglXA8eDE A Pines'i 'EDinAL ButLDING
' " '" "'T*.",'#"'"""*"'
COngrC66 0f (IJc EnitCD SPtatc$
u,,cl ", ' " ', ' ", ' '
ot 3,o, o,,,,,,....
.,m.m.,_............_,
1)onge of Representatibc5 T3tL Fatt t 800 235 2525 Niast)ington, DC 20515-3225 May 11, 1992 Mr. Dennis Rathbun Director Congressional Affairs
-Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Dear Mr. Rathbun:
Enclosed is correspondence _I have received from Mr. Alan D.
Sweet in regards to the difficulty he has encountered in obtaining information on the Fitzpatrick nuclear power plant.
I would appreciate your review of this matter.
Please reply to me at my District Office, Alexander Pirnie Federal Building, 10 Broad Street, Room 200, Utica, New
. York, 13501.
Thank you for your assistance.
I look forward to hearing from you, i b ely,
~ b S
d Boehlert
)
Member of Congress SB: krk Enclosure
/
stolooy o 33 XA
/
%uuw
/
s.A:~ s rmt 2 s..oAo srmt w c, 2c2 so..,c
~..c
- o.,,
c
~r. sie,m o.2c li..
h Maro27,1992 L
From: ' Alan D. Sweet Box 115
- Plymouth, N.Y.
13832 Too Karl Abraham Nuclear Regulatory Commission 4
Region 1 office 475 Allendale Rd.
King of Prussia, Pa.
19406
Dear Karl Abraham,
This is~in response to our recent correspondance (see attached ccpies)
I feel my request has been misunderstood. The information-I was requesting were the N.R.C.'s point by point detailed review and reccomendations regarding the New York Power Authority's plans to improve operations.
The document you sent me talks about these reviews but has no specific assessments other tha., vague refer-ences to the continuation of the review process.
I am willing.to ellow that the mistake was simply a misunderstanding cf what what vas being requested. I would rather not believe that the N.R.C.
is attempting to-stifle public participation by delaying and deliber-
- atly confusing its responces to the public.
please' reassure me that rhe N.R.C.
is indeed w~orthy of its role of protecting the public by sending te the following.
l..The " Diagnostic Evaluation Teem Report as referred to in line 2 of the letter you did provido me.
- 2. The Fitzpatrick Assessment Panel's Detailed Review of the Fitzpatrick results improvment Pr6 gram - referred to in the second para-graph of the letter you provided.
I hope to maintain the opinion that the N.R.C.
is capable of working with the public sector in protecting our security. Thank you for your atten-tion to this-matter.
l
.Sicerely, f'
g' Alan D.
Sweet cc.-Congressman Sherwood Boehlert
i
't.
1 y
- ^
nation reach a ctosensus cn this m."I contend mewssnan - that the people of this-country are overdue for passage L.1d implenentation of the Russo bill - H.R. 1300 !
I work providmg health care in a physician's office, and have for 8 years now.' Prior to this I was a Health care technician in.the hosp-ital here in Norwich. I have - therefore - had the advantage of a long standing closeup view of how our health care systen does and doesn't work. The MAJOR obstacle to providing good care to all who need it,( which I hopa is our mutual objective :) is the whole' current reinbursenent system. The multiple redundancy of public and r.;ivate payments for health care and the en2shing administrative costs associated with this are the prirary reascn for the increases in the costs of health care while so nuny of the disadvantaged people in our culture have inade-quate or no coverage, and will likely remain poorly covered under any hzt a universal socialized systen ie. the Russo bill.
Please do what you can to nove this bill quickly and positivly through congress. In the event that the Russo bill is stymied, Your endorsarent; of Se N.Y.S. analog to it - N.Y. Health ( A - 8912 ) would be greatly appreciated. ( see appendix F )
In conclusion I again trank you for your help, and appreciate your wring' record - especially your 'nc' vote on H.R.776 with its pro-nu-clear tilt.I hope I am helpful in providing opinions stich, I feel, represent a large portion of ycar constituents.
Si.carelv Alan D. Sweet
/ -
/
f i
1 h.a
CONGRESSIONAL CORRESPONDENCE SYSTEX DOCUMENT PREPARATION CXECKLIST
- he submitted with each document (or group of This checklist is
.Qs/As) bent for.
ing into the CCs._.
Y 1.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT (5) 10t'l ( JJ nta d
/ MuW /
TrPR OF-M Correspeda=
Esaringss(QsufW 2.
3.
DOCUMENT CONTacA senaitive- (wmC only)
M ; Mon-8emaitive ccNGREsSIONAL COMMITTEE and SURCOMMITTEES (if applicable) 4.
congressional Consittee subcommittee 4
5.
SUMECT CODES (a)
(b)
(c) 6.
SOURCE OF DOCUMENTS (a) 5520 (document name-(b)
Scan.,
(c)
Attachmette k
Other (d)
Rehey (e) 7.
SYSTER LOS DATES b
Date.OCL.eeat document to CCS (a)
(b)
DatesCCS;Eeselvenes document:
Date returned to CCA for additional inforssation (c)
~
Date resubmitted by-OCA to CCS (4)
Data entered into CCS by (e)
Date CCA notified that document is in CCS (f) 8.-
COMMENTS O ? O f' N D
_