ML20080R141
| ML20080R141 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 01/23/1984 |
| From: | Williams J FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20080R133 | List: |
| References | |
| L-84-16, NUDOCS 8402280156 | |
| Download: ML20080R141 (2) | |
Text
_ _ _
(
P. O. BOX 14000, JUNO BE ACH, F L 33408 t
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY January 23, 1984 L-84-16 Mr. Janes P. O'Reilly Regional Administrator, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street NW, Suite 2900 Atl anta, Georgi a 30303
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
Re:
St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335, 50-389 Inspection Report 83-41/69 Florida Power & Light Company has reviewed the subject inspection report and a response is attached.
There is no proprietary information in the report.
Very truly yours,
}
J. W. Wil Jr.
Vice President Nuclear Energy Department JWW/PLP/js
. Attachment cc:
Harold F. Reis, Esquire PNS-LI-84-30 0402280156 G4020e l
PDR ADOCK 05000335 G
PDR PEOPLE,. SERVING PEOPLE
St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335, 50-389 Inspection Report 83-41/69 Finding:
Technical Specification 6.8.1.a requires that written procedures be established, implemented, and maintained for those functional areas identified in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33 Revision 2,1978. General maintenance procedure M-0018 revision 8, Mechanical Maintenance Safety Related Preventive Maintenance Program, establishes and implements the necessary procedures to conduct preventive maintenance on safety-related or Technical Specification (TS) equipment. Maintenance procedure file M-0018-PM-04805 performs a semi-annual lubrication procedure for component cooling water pumps.
Contrary to the above, on December 1,1983, the inspector found that pl ant work orders (PW0) 2573 and PWO 2575 were not completed in accordance with step 3.3 of M-0018-PM-04805.
RESPONSE
1.
FPL concurs with the finding.
2.
The fi1 ding occurred because although the condition of the oil was checked on both PWO's; it was not documented due to an oversight. The omission was not noticed during the review process.
3.
As corrective action, the conditon of the oil was noted on both PWO's.
4.
The following corrective actions were taken to prevent future problens:
a.
Because the oversight was caused by doing more than just preventive maintenance (PM) work on the PWO, in the future only PM activities will be on this type PWO.
b.
The QC supervisor has sent a directive to QC personnel to review and initial the PWO review portion of the applicabic quality instruction.
c.
The involved mechanical maintenance supervisor has been made aware of his PWO review responsibility.
5.
Full compli ance was achieved January 17, 1984.
a A