ML20070E109
| ML20070E109 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 02/28/1991 |
| From: | Sieber J DUQUESNE LIGHT CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9103040314 | |
| Download: ML20070E109 (2) | |
Text
..
Duquesne @ hpaw geglyra n>- > s'-"
Srccyport. 5% 1f077 (V)f4 February 28, 1991 000.hU$x w o~+.e wt m' "
U.
S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:
Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1 and No. 2 DV-1 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 BV-2 Docket No. 50-412, License No. NPF-73 Allegation Regarding Failure to Prick While Exiting A Controlled Area In response to NRC correspondence dated January 31, 1991, the attached reply addresses the Allegation regarding the failure of an individual to frisk when exiting a controlled area.
As requested, the response does not include privacy information, proprietary, or safeguards information.
If there are any questions concerning this response, please contact Mr. Joseph A. Kosmal at (412) 393-7648.
Sincerely,
.}h A'
J.
D.
Sieber Vice President Nuclear Group Attachment cc:
Mr.
J.
Beall, Sr. Resident Inspector Mr.
T.
T. Martin, NRC Region I Administrator Mr. Charles W.
Hehl, Director, Division of Reactor Projects, Region I Mr.
A. W..DeAgazio, Project Manager t
910304031g(($$hf434 PDR ADOC PDR dh)-
K
/
Duquesne Light Company Nuclear Group Beaver Valley Power Station Units 1 and 2 Egply to Allegatign Lottor dated January 31, 1991 AlleaatioD Allegation regarding the failure of an individual to frisk when exiting a
controlled area as described in NRC correspondence dated January 31, 1991.
Validity of the AssertioD The assertion is valid as stated.
Cause of this Event Investigation of this allegation concluded that,-on the shift the event
- occurred, an individual was engaged in testing security alarms and forgot to frisk when leaving the Refueling Water Storage Tank (RWST) controlled area.
When questioned, the individual stated that
-he understood the requirement for frisking when leaving that area and that ho did frisk at another location a short timo later.
gorrective Actions to Prevent Recurrence This incident was reported to the individual's supervision who counselled; him about the event the next day following the event.
His supervisor stressed -the importance of following radiological control rules and the potential effects-of not frisking as required.
Additional follow-up-. included shift briefings to ensure that other appropriate personnel who perform similar tasks were aware of frisking proceduros.
Ebether a Deficiency Exists in the PpIsonal Radiation Procram The radiation programs-for personnel are not considered deficient for the following reasons:
The individual stated that he was aware of the requirements.
Frisking instructions are posted at the RWST door location.
It-should be noted that the RWST area is a non-contaminated area and the frisking requirement is a precautionary measure.