ML20050C120
| ML20050C120 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 04/01/1982 |
| From: | Letsche K KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY |
| To: | LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20050C121 | List: |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8204080158 | |
| Download: ML20050C120 (5) | |
Text
.-
2(il UNITED STATES OF AMERICbgly..
}i NUCLEAR REGULATORY.COlifiISSION D
BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING;DOA350 h
'[}
)
k In the !!atter of
)
T
)
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY
)
Docket No. 50-322
.I?
Q
)
f 4
(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station,
)
Unit 1)
)
{s
" < CO ygg
)
app 7
= c,;.
198Lu
~
SUFFOLK COUNTY INTERROGATORIES AND DOCUMENT NdPere, d a~
156~" "
REQUESTS ON SUFFOLK COUNTY CONTENTIONS 16 AND 20 4
<d W
Pursuant to the Licensing Board's :tarch 15 Memorandum Order, Suffolk County hereby propounds the following Interroga-
- /
~
tories and Document Requests to LILCO.
CONTENTION 16 1.
Provide copies of all Shoreham procedures developed for or relating to the ATWS event.
Also provide copies of all analyses or other documents which form the basis for or which relate to the procedure (s).
2.
Describe in detail the training program developed for training Shoreham operators on the correct actions to be taken in response to ATWS events.
3.
Provide a complete description of the Recirculation Pump Trip features incorporated at the Shoreham Plant.
Indicate if all modifications have been co.npleted.
If work remains to be
- /
For convenience, the County has combined these Interrogatories and Document Requests in a single filing.
~
6 40 I
8204080158 820403 gDRADOCK 05000322 h8 l PDR
. done, indicate what work and provide the schedule for its implementation.
4.
With regard to boron injection capability, provide a full description of the system (s) in place at Shoreham, if not already set forth in the FSAR.
Identify any changes from the FSAR description and whether or not such changes have been made.
Provide the schedule for implementation of any changes yet to be done.
5.
Provide details of any CRD system changes made or expected to be made as a result of NRC's report NUREG-0803.
6.
Has LILCO implemented or does LILCO intend to imple-ment any system modifications to provide for automated bcron 16jection?
If so, provide full details and the anticipated schedule if not yet completed.
7.
Has LILCO performed any analyses to determine the feasibility of making the standby liquid control system initiate automatically?
If so, provide copies of all such analyses.
8.
Provide copies of all documents submitted by LILCO to the NRC Staf f which relate to LILCO's method (s) for responding to an ATWS event.
CONTENTION 20 1.
Produce all documents, including the Shoreham simulator design specification and accepted equipment supplier. proposals,
. which evidence LILCO's commitment to provide a Shoreham-specific simulator for operator training.
2.
Produce all documents and drawings which describe or depict (a) the Dresden simulator, and/or (b) the Limerick l
simulator, including the front panel arrangement of and controls used in the operation of the following systems:
(i) nuclear steam supply system (i.e., reactor vessel and controls, reactor coolant system, reactor pro-tection systems);
(ii) emergency safeguards systems; (iii) containment systems and containment isolation l
provisions; (iv) radiation monitoring system; and 1
l (v) balance of plant systems.
l l
3.
Provide a copy of the classroom training curriculum l
1 for Shoreham operators, including those portions pertaining to simulator training.
i l
4.
Set forth in detail LILCO's schedule-for (a) imple-mentation of a Shoreham-specific simulator for operator training; (b) use of the Limerick simulator; and (c) discontinuance of use of the Dresden simulator.
l 5.
Provide a complete listing and description of all transients and accidents which (a) the Dresden simulator is capable of replicating or duplicating; and (b) the Limerick I
simulator is capable of replicating or duplicating, j
- 6..
With respect to each transient-and accident identified in response to subpart (a) and subpart (b) of number 5 above, state i
1 m
. the dynamic characteristics and operator response times for the referenced simulator, and also state the expected control response capability at Shoreham.
7.
What is the minimum number of people LILCO intends to have trained on (a) the Dresden simulator, and (b) the Limerick simulator, for each of the following positions:
(1)
Reactor Operator (RO)
(ii)
Senior Reactor Operator (SRO)
(iii)
Senior Reactor Operator Limited to Fuel Handling (SRO-R)
(iv)
Auxiliary Operator 8.
How many hours per week of simulator control room exercises will be provided each operator during the 12-week operator training course discussed in FSAR Section 13.2.1.1.3, and how many of such hours will an operator spend at (a) the Dresden simulator, and (b) the Limerick simulator.
9.
Identify and describe all events, transients and accidents studied by Shoreham operators in the simulator control room exercises.
10.
Identify the criteria to be used by LILCO to determine that a particular simulator meets the requirements stated in FSAR Section 13.2.1.5.
("a complete and accurate nuclear power plant simulator"), i.e., identify the criteria used by LILCO to determine daat a simulator duplicates or replicates the Shoreham control room.
Produce all documents which relate to these criteria.
I.
I 11.
(a) How many LILCO cmploycoc, or cmploysso of Stona
& Webster, General Electric, or other LILCO subcontractors, in i
each of the'following categories, will receive Shoreham-specific I
training; and (b) for each category of employees, describe the nature ar.d extent of such training:
(i)
Headquarters Engineering (ii)
Headquarters Operations Management l
121
\\(a) Identify the number and qualifications of the LILCO, G.E., Stone & Webster, other consultants and vendors' startup s
engineer personnel, who will assist newly-licensed Shoreham operators dcring the retraining period, as set forth in FSAR
,,Section 13. 2 '.1. 6. 3 ; (b). state how long such personnel will be hvailable; and (c) describe the hierarchy of authority or chain of command (i) among such personnel, and (ii) between them and the operators.
- 13.. In FSAR Section 13.2.2.1.5, LILCO lists six Etethods to ensure operators' review of abnormal and emergency operating procedures.
Is it LILCO's position that any one of the listed methods is adequate to ensure an operator's review?
If not, identify what combination (s) of such methods-LILCO would consider adequate.
Respectfully submitted, DAVID J. GILMARTIN PATRICIA A. DEMPSEY Suffolk County Department of Law Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 l
Herbert H. BroWh i Lawrence Coe ganpher Karla J. Le tsche KIRKPATRICK, LOCKHART,. HILL, CHRISTOPHER & PHILLIPS 1900 M Street,-N.W., 8th Floor Washington, D.C.
20036
. 'y (202) 452-7000 April:1, 1982-Attorneys'for Suffolk County