05000315/LER-1981-016-03, /03L-0:on 810601,procedure Review Revealed That Selected Valves Were Not Cycled at Frequency & in Operating Modes Required by Tech Specs.Caused by Personnel Error. Procedures Revised

/03L-0:on 810601,procedure Review Revealed That Selected Valves Were Not Cycled at Frequency & in Operating Modes Required by Tech Specs.Caused by Personnel Error. Procedures Revised

ML20009A904
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	06/30/1981
From:	Keith R INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML20009A902	List: 05000315/LER-1981-016, Forwards LER 81-016/03L-0 05000315/LER-1981-016-03, /03L-0:on 810601,procedure Review Revealed That Selected Valves Were Not Cycled at Frequency & in Operating Modes Required by Tech Specs.Caused by Personnel Error. Procedures Revised
References
LER-81-016-03L-01, LER-81-16-3L-1, NUDOCS 8107140445
Download: ML20009A904 (3)

LER-1981-016, /03L-0:on 810601,procedure Review Revealed That Selected Valves Were Not Cycled at Frequency & in Operating Modes Required by Tech Specs.Caused by Personnel Error. Procedures Revised

Event date:
Report date:
3151981016R03 - NRC Website

text

- - -.

N,RC FORM OS6 U. ~ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (7 77)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT CONTROL BLOCK: I I

l l

l l

1 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION) 1 6

FIIl l Ml Il DI Cl Cl ll@l 0 l 0 l 0l 0 l 0 l 0 l 0 l 0 l 0 l 0 l 0 l@l 4 l 1 l 1 l 1 l 1 l@l l

l@

7 8 9 LICENSEE CODE 14 1S LICENSE NUMBER 26 26 LICENSE TYPE JO 57 CAT 68 CON'T IoI11 S$R$ILl@l015l01010l3l1l5l@l0l610l1l8l1l@l0l6I310lRl1 l@

7 8

60 61 DOCKET NUMBER 68 69 EVENT DATE 74 75 REPORT DATE 80 EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES h o 2 lDURING PROCEDURE REVIEW IT VAS DISCOVERED THAT SELECTED VALVES WERE NOT CYCLED AT THF l Io Ial l FREQUENCY AND IN THE OPERATING MODES REOUIRED BY TECH. SPEC. 4.6.3.1.la. BUT WERE l

loi4Il TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TECH. SPEC. 4.6.3.1.2d.

ALSO. THE RE0VIREMENTS OF TECH. SPED.

l o i s i 14.7.3.la-4 WERE PERFORMED ON A 92 DAY VICE 31 DAY FREQUENCY.

SIMILAk EVENTS WERE I

I O 16 l l REPORTED IN 80-007 AND 80-029.

I lo l71 l l

10 t 81 1 I

DE CODE SUSC E COMPONENT CODE SUBC dE SU E

1o191 1717 l@ laj@ L)<J@ 17171 z 1717 I z 18 L2_J@ LIJ @

7 8

9 10 11 12 13 18 19 20 l VENT YE A R

'l-l 10 11 16 l l/l 1013 l lJ;_J

(--]

[0]

REPORT O DE Y

N.

LERIRO E

O,ag 81 11 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 AK f A

ON L NT ME HOURS 22 S8 IT D FOR B.

S PPL F MA FACTURER lG l@l zl@

LzJ@

Lz._J@

l 01010101 t.YJ@

[N_J O Lz_j @

I z 191919 l@

33 34 35 36 37 40 41 42 43 44 47 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS IiiOI [IFE CAUSE OF THIS EVENT WAS PERSONNEL ERROR WHICH RESULTED IN DEFICIENT PROCEDURES BEING i i IGENERATED. A CONSULTANT WAS HIRED TO PREPARE THF PROCFDURFS TO IMPIFMFNT THF TST l

l i 1 a l IPROGRAM SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM FOR BOTH UNITS. AFTER THE UNIT 2 PROCEDURES WERE COMPLETED lilal ITHE UNIT 1 PROCEDURES WERE REVISED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF UNIT 2 ARE CONTROLLED BY THE I IiI4IIISI PROGRAM.

THE REQUIREMENTS FOR UNIT 1 ARE A MIXTURE OF ISI PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS I

F ACILITY METHOD OF STATUS

% POWER OTHER STATUS DISCOV E R Y DISCOVERY DESCBIPTION 32

} I115i L.DJ@ LILI 010 l@l NA l

lAl@l PROCEDURE / TECH. SPEC.REVIEV l

t.

A TlVITY CO TENT AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY LOCATION OF RELE ASE RELE ASED@OF RELE ASE[2J@l NA J

l NA l

[_zj 1 6 PERSONNEL EXPOS ES NUMBE R TYPE

DESCRIPTION

l1171 l 01010 l@[zj@lNA l

7 PERSONNE L INJURIES NUMBER DESCRIP TtON l010l0l@l NA I

1 R 7

8 9 1'

12 80 TYPE D CR PT ON Lz_J@l NA l

i 9 PUBU$TY 8107140445 810701 DESCRIPTION @ PDR ADOCK 05000215 NnC USE ONLY isSUEfbl S

PDR l

lllllllllllll$

((L NA 2 o 7

A 9

- 10 68 69 80 5 R.S. KEITH pgoyg% M N N N

{

NAME OF PREPARER

SUPPLEMENT TO LER #81-016/03L-0

27) AND SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS IN SELECTED TECH. SPECS. THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE UNIT 2 ISI PROGRAM WERE MISTAKENLY APPLIED TO REVISIONS TO UNIT 1 SURVEILLANCE TEST PROCEDURES.

A.) VIOLATION OF TECH. SPEC. 4.6.3.1.la THE VALVES IN QUESTION WERE REMOVED FROM 1-0HP 4030.STP.011, CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVE OPERABILITY TEST, WHICH IS PERFORMED IN MODES 1, 2, 3 AND 4, IN DECEMBER, 1973, WHEN THE PROCEDURE WAS REVISED TO INCORPORATE ISI REQUIREMENTS, THE ISI PROGRAM CALLED FOR THE VALVES TO BE TESTED IN MODES 5 AND 6.

HOWEVER, TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 4.6.3.1.la AND TABLE 3.6-1 REQUIRED THE TESTING IN HOT MODES 1, 2, 3 AND 4.

THUS WHEN THE VALVES WERE REMOVED FROM 1-OHP 4030.STP.011, WHICH IS DONE EVERY 92 DAYS IN MODES 1, 2, 3 AND 4 AND PLACED IN 1-OHP 4030.STP.033, WHICH IS DONE AT LEAST DURING EVERY REFUELING ($12 MONTHS), TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 4.6.3.1.la WAS VIOLATED. THE PROBLEM BEING THAT THE ISI PROGRAM CALLED FOR THE VALVES TO BE TESTED WITH THE UNIT SHUTDOWN WHILE THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATILNS CALLED FOR THE VALVES TO BE TESTED DURING PLANT OPERATION. WHEN THE PROCEDURE 3 WERE REVISED IN DECEMBER, 1978 THE DIFFERENCE IN THE REQUIREMENTS WERE OVERLOOKED WITH THE ISI CRITERIA BEING USED.

VIOLATION OF TECH. SPEC. 4.7.3.la-4 THE TECH. SPEC. REQUIRES EACH TESTABLE POWER OPERATED OR AUTOMATIC VALVE SERVICING SAFETY RELATED EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CYCLED ONCE PER 31 DAYS IN MODES 1, 2, 3 AND 4.

1-OHP 4030.STP.020 THROUGH REV. 4 ACCOMPLISHED THIS TESTING.

1-0HP 4030.STP.020, REV. 5 ISSUED FEBRUARY, 1979 CHANGED THE FREQUENCY FROM 31 DAYS TO 92 DAYS TO AGREE WITH THE ISI PROGRAM.

1

SUPPLEMENT TO LER #81-016/03L-0 THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE REFERENCED TECH. SPEC. ARE MORE STRINGENT THAN THAT REQUIRED BY THE ISI PROGRAM.

PARAGRAPH 4.0.5 IN THE UNIT 2 TECH.

SPECS DOES NOT EXIST IN THE UNIT 1 TECH. SPEC.

TO PREVENT RE0CCURRENCE WE HAVE NOW MADE A DETAILED REVIEW 0F THE UNIT 1 TECH. SPEC., THE ISI PROGRAM AND THE IMPLEMENTING SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES.

SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN REVISED AND THE VALVE CYCLING AND TESTING FREQUENCY IS N0W SCHEDULED FOR THE MORE STRINGENT OF EITHER THE ISI PROGRAM OR THE TECH. SPEC. AND WILL FULFILL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TECH. SPEC.

A REVISION TO THE UNIT 1 TECH. SPEC. AND ISI PROGRAM WILL BE REQUESTED TO MAKE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR BOTH UNITS CONSISTENT WITH EACH OTHER AND PROVIDE FOR FEWER VARIABLES BETWEEN THE TWO UNIT'S TESTING REQUIREMENTS.

l