ML19326A324
| ML19326A324 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 02/18/1977 |
| From: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Roe L TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19326A321 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8002030145 | |
| Download: ML19326A324 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000346/1977003
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_. _ _ _ _ _ __ _ ' '
- s
O 'N b -
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION 111 799 ROOSEVELT RO AO GLEN ELLYN. lLLINOl$ 60137 IEFILE00M ITB 181977 Toledo Edison Company Docket Co. 50-346 ATDI: Ifr. Lowell E. Roe Vice President Facilities Development Edison Plaza 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43652 Gentlemen: This refers to the inspection conducted by Messrs. 2. D. Martin, T. 3. Tambling, J. E. Kohler, W. S. Little and R. J. Cook of this office on January 3, 11-14 and 25-27, 1977, of activities at Davis-Besse Unit 1 Construction site author 1=ed by 'iRC Construction Permic CPPR-80 and to the discussion of our find- ings with you and members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection. v The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas ayamin=d during the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective eymination of procedures and representative records, observations, and interviews with personnel. No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified during the course of this inspection. During the inspection dealing with the review of the 1976 Integrated Leak Rata Test (see Management Interview of January 3, 1977, and paragraph 7 of the Report Details), and based on our inspector's understanding, your representatives agreed to provide this office with certain information regarding procedural controls relating to local leak rate testing and acceptance criteria for containment isolation valve maintenance. Therefore, we request that the following information be provided within thirty days of your receipt of this letter: The manner in which you will evaluate equipment hatch leakage a. test results to assure compliance with the Technical Speci- fications as shown in T.S. Table 3.6-1. O i l O pnt.,% e m s sl',.M.?5 8002030M5 ?= % s ~O f m..e _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ . - . .-
' . m - J - . ' Toledo Edison Company -2- @ l 81977 b. The manner in which you will nonitor the effects of subsequent local leak rate testing of penetrations to assure compliance with the Technical Specifications. c. The manner in which the licensee vill establish the leak rate acceptance criteria for individual containment iso- lation valves following repair of such a valve, and the required acceptance testing to be performed. Please note that we are requesting general information on the controls to be established; the specific controls are not required until such activities take place, and will be reviewed in detail during a later, appropriate inspection. ' With regards to your preoperational testing program, we wish to reemphasize to you our position, which has been discussed with you on several occasions in the past, that the results of pre- operational tests which are to be completed prior to fuel loading
must be reviewed and approved by the appropriate levels of management before we can make a finding that your facility is prepared to load fuel. Recent inspections have led us to conclude that the rate of review and analysis of test results by your staff s is not connaneurate with the rate of conducting tests. We are, therefore, concerned that the backlog of safety related tests requiring review and analysis may becoma a major constraint to a finding on our part of your readiness to load fuel. In accordance with Section 2.790 of the URC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room, except as fo'llows. If this report contains information that you or your contractors believe to be proprietary, you must apply in writing to this office, within twenty days of your receipt of this letter, to withhold such information from public disclosure. The application must include a full statement of the reasons for which the information is con- sidered proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary information identified in the application is contained in an enclosure to the application. l t O i l ! _ _. _ __
___ _ . _ . _ . _ . . . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . . _ . - .__ _ _ _ . - ' .s - . Toledo Edison Company -3- {{g 1 g 1977 We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection. Sincerely yours, James G. Keppler Regional Director Enclosure: I2 Inspection Report . No. 050-346/77-03 ) . ce w/ad: Central Piles ' Reproduction Unic NRC 20b PDR , i Local PDR ! NSIC TIC U. Young Park, Power Siting Commission 1 l
l . l l ' . . _ _ . -_ ,. . _ _. . . _ . . , _ _ _ . . . - ~ , _ _ , _ _ _ _ , _ . . _ . }}