ML19322C333

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Acquisition Mgt,Us Air Force Sys Safety Program
ML19322C333
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/06/1979
From:
AIR FORCE, DEPT. OF
To:
References
TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8001160862
Download: ML19322C333 (4)


Text

. - ____________________________

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AF REGULATION 800-16 Headquarters US Air Force Washington DC 20330 6 June.1979 Acquisition Management Attach:nent 1 USAF SYSTEM SAFETY PROGRAMS This regulation explains policy on system safety programs and makes Air Force activities responsible for carrying out that policy throughout the system life cycle. It requires each major command (M AJCOM) to establish and wduct or support an effective USAF System Safety Program within existing command resources. It.pplies to all commands and implements DODI 5000.36,6 December 1978. System Safety Engineering and Management.

All M AJCOM and Separate Operating Agency (SOA) supplements to this regulation must be coordinated with AFISC/SES before publication.

Paragraph Section A-General Information System Safety Program Objective...................................................

I Basic Co n ce pt................................

2 Te r ms Ex p lai n e d.................................................................

3 Section B-Air Force Policy System Safety Program Requirements..............................................

4 Co n t ract ua l P rovisio n s..........................................................

5 Section C-Responsibilities Assigned HQUSAF.................................................................

6 Air Force Inspection and Safety Center (AFISC)..........

7 U si n g Co m m a nd s...............................................................

8 I m ple me nti n g Co m ma nd s.........................................................

9 Air Force Logistics Command (A FLC)...................,.........................

10 Section D-System Safety Groups G ene ra l R e q uire m e n ts............................................................

II I m p le me n ti n g Co m ma nd s........................................................

12 Air Fo rce Logistics Com ma r.d (A FLC).............................................

13 Nonnuclear Munitions Safety Board (NN MS B)......................................

14 Nuclear Weapons System Safety Group (NWSSG)....................................

15 1

SECTION A-GENERAL INFORMATION program so that the results of the analyses will be considered during the system or facility design. The 1.

System Safety Program Objective. To mimmize role of hazard analyses and studies is essentiallv that of

_I loss of personnel and material resources through mishaps and to preserve the combat capability of the bringing to the attention of management the potential risk factors. These factors must be considered in Air Force by ensuring system safety is applied making logical and effective decisions to provide for throughout a system life cycle.

the best system safety.

2.

Basic Concept. The basic concept of the overall 3.

Terms Explained:

l US AF System Safety Program isto identify. evaluate.

System. A composite of equipment, skills, and and climinate or control hazards before the techm. ques capable of performing and/or supporting

(

production and deployment phase of systems or the construction phase of facilities. Hazard analysis is an operational role. A coinplete system includes emphasized during each development or modification related facilities, equipment, material, services, and personnel required for its operation to the degree that l

it can be considered a self-sufficient unit in its intended Supersedes AFR 127-8.19 April 1976. (See signature operational and/or support environment.

page for summary of changes.)

b.

System Safety. The best degree of safety within No of Printed Pages: 6 the constraints of operational effectiveness, time,and l

OPR: IGD (Capt Peter Carosella. AFISC/SES) cost attained through specific application of system Approved by: Brig Gen Garry A. Willard Jr.

safety management and engineering principles Writer Editor: M. M. Green whereby hazards are identified and risk minimized Distribution: F; X: Defense Systems Management throughout all phases of the system or facility life School. Ft Belvoir VA 22060...100 cys cycle.

8001160[Q O

l I

I S

3 A5 R 50016 Af R ges.gg 3

c.

Synsens Safety Managessens. An element of implementing conima nd before a program 3 Ensure that systene operationalconcepts, when programal management that es.abbshes alw system safety management directive tPMDlis issued.

g,3 p u p, sequired, adequately adJress safety factors.

prograin requirements and ensures the planning-b.

Syssem safety engmeeting wig become a 9.

Implemenrhs Commands. Dese commands:

(di Mode (scation directises inaplemensasson. and accomphshment of tasks and activities to achieve systein safety, consistent with the working part of the system engineering activity and (c) System Safety Program Plans-Estabhsh and maimmin a capabihty to conduct overap program requisements.

mill receive management anention as a past of the (f) System Salcay Group (SSG) charters (for system safety progrants by:

n.

system engineering process d.

Syssen Safety Engineering. An elemens of maior psograms)

(4 Definin g systeni safety prageam Management ami enameering personnct will (g) System Operass. mal Concepis.

responsi%hties and objectives for intraco.umand c.

systema engineering involving the application et review system safety requuements. criteria, and scientific and engineersag principles for the timel identification of harards and snatiation of those constraints when documeniang Class I through Y p) Provides representaaion foe sclected design guidance.

Y actions necessary to prevent or control hasards wishin modification changes ( A FR 3 L4) to mak e surc system and readiness sesicus and management inspections.

(2) Ensuring organisational selectures and the system la draws upon professional k nowledge and safety levels are not degraded.

N R'P"" O' Air F" i" "D"" **f"I resources are adequate se perform required antem 3,

p,,,,,,,,,,p,,,,,,,,,, g,q,,,,, g,, p,,,,,,,

PO gNNd W safety program acsions. Designate full-time, primary NW M speciar. sed skills an the mathematical. physical and "I "

duty system safety managers wuhan systern prograen and invitation for til of systems ce facituies related scoe stific disciplines. together wish she i

. (4) AttenJs selected SSG meetmgs and presides or project offices to act as focal posals for system principles or a methods of eng,neering design and esition win repin dcted pwh of Mlle anlaysis to specify, predict, and evaluate the safety of S ID-882in the coneract As a minimum,thecenteact guidance to make sure the integrity of sysicm safety safety efforts. If a specshc program does not require a must include a.

management amt enginecting processes is achiend fultaime sygem safety mananger, assure adequate stan assistance and engencering support is made e.

Systens Safety Cronp. A formally chartered Detailed descripsion of system safety tash W Ads as revne ng ami appreng au tY availaMe to perlorm speedied s)sicm safety tasks.

a.

for the Nonnaclear Mumtions Safety Boa rd group of persons oiga to assist the K Schedule for complaion of hasard analyses-program / system manager. niacd en achieving the system (Analyses must be avadable for review before the (NNMSR) seports on new or moddied anonsrions

"""*D*'*"

safety objectives-(Al R 12y-16k safety programs for each sygens or facihty development and modihcanon for which the b.

The Directorage of.Nucleat Surety f.

Masard Analyses. lbe methods used toidentify and evaluais baiards. Analyses cover the sempicle SECTION C-RESPONSIBil.lTIES ASSIGNED (AFISCASNF esercises staff supervision over the implementing command has responsibility.

6.

IIQ USAF nuclear safety pengram, as OPR for the 122 series e.

integrave system safety nutestones into the total spectrum from qual,itative preliminary basar# ludies Al Rs and performs the nuclear safety related tasks systent acquisdion program to be cosasstent with othes to system logic diagrams containing quantitative a.

Each 18 0 USAF office of primary outbacd in a0) through (4) above.

enginectmg and psogram management spilestones by:

probabilities of mishap-responsibiht- ". an operational system or facility ID Assessin8 saIefY rnks 88 program inination 3 Qnantified Safety llequirement. A desised, developme r or mod:fication must make sure that the

s. Lising ressmands.1hesceommands support Air to define the scope and detail of system safcay ptogram predictable. and demonsen bie level of iafety. usually PMD in< ades system safesy program requirements.

f orce Systems Command ( Af'SC) and Air f orce re9nmenis.

espressed as a harerd sasc or probabahty of mishap.

the system safety requirements must also be Legntis t ummand i Al l C) conducted sparen safety (2) laciuding the system, safety prognar:

h.

Mhhop. Anunplannedeventorscricsof erents documented in each directive for an Advanced programs and psolects lhey make sure that cequuements and criteria in directises. planamg and that result en death, injury, occupational illaess, or pe,egopment, pagineegsag pe,elopment, os intracommand guidance identifies she safety acquisition documentation, requests for proposals, damage to or loss of equipment os p operty' Management and Support R esca tch and organisations, objeceives, and responsibilities specifications, and seasements of work.

i. Hazard. Aay condition thal has lhe potentialof IVvelopment program. when the program is e spected necessasy to support these progsams. As a minimam.

causing a mishop.

to produce a prototypeor facihey. Safety risks must be M AlCOM*

O) Ensuring laboratories document safety cliteria, critical items. and harards identified duesng addressed in the "f or comme nt

  • Decision a Spenly in the SON any requircJ safety theis efforts.1 hese cri.r sa are to l ecome s pare of she

).

Safety Celskal Itt en.

Any component, Coasdinaison Papers (DCPs). Ior major system features that ase not stanJud design peutke psoject when in transitions to the development phase equipment, or system which can fatt and lead to a acquinsion, furnish risk assessments to el e Service (including safety considerations of suppotting L aboratorics shoulJ heep the safety community an sre situation with a potentialfor asajee inimey es damage.

Acquintion Review Councils. Marcoser, inform the k.

Major System Acquishion. A major systern Assistant Secretary of Defense (Manpower. Reserve facshrecs or equermenO. Ifarards or sydem sakty of their progress in development of devices, acquisuion programs to be of such importance and

^U*i's, and I;ogistics) of any signifuan hasards that constraints peculiar to command mission, base, equipment, and materials that enhance safety.

priority as to requise special management assenti4 e relate to major systems befose the Milestone 11 operassons. suppost, or meteorological ensaronments (AFR 300 2).

decision.

must be identified (4) Ensuring system safesy harard assessments are presented at design and program reviens.

b b.

SECTION 3-AIR FORCE POElCY The Deputy inspector General for inspectson Assess safety risks at program initiation to

0) Consdesing systern safety in all testing.

and Safety has specific sesponsibility for developmg define the scope and d; tad of syuem safety program requirements.

Whese normal testing is not srfficient to demonstrate d,

Syssee Safety P*egras fsteq=aramensa. Syslem p hey and providing guidance on applying system safe operation, perpare and monitor special safely a

and engineering to Air Ncc He i

IMe M a

si udeMudion safety enginceting ana ts#%gement controis must be apphed to each progeant er project throughout the operations. and test prngram pfanama documentation (6) ProviJms AFIC with all sistem safety systene or facility ide cycle. The safety program to make sure titat it includes adequate system safety 7,

4 3, y,,,,,,,,,,,g,,,,, 3,,,,7 p,,,,, g4 ggscy, esens-analyses and documentation of outstanding safety requiresnents must be applied through approprmte issues at Program Management Responsibehty tailoring of MileSithes2.

a.

The Director of Aerosp' ace Sa fet y yp,,p,;,,,,,,,

5,,,,, 3,r,,, w,,,and, w he n

,,,;,,,er (PM R1), including identification of safety d.

Participate as as SSG member Transf

( Al-tSC/ SIT ~

,, g,,,,

a.

Systern safety requiremeats, criteria, and (SSWG) member.

constrainte must be cer.sidered by originasoes olcach ID Reviews Att f.orce technical and

6) Developing procedures for the safe and Stateinent of Operational Need (SON) document management documents to make, sure the proper e.

It e siew engineering change proposats, environmentally acceptable disposal or (AFR $7-8) in describing user needs. The SON te a safety requirements are encluded. These deviations, and waivers for impact on system safety, demilitseisation of any harardous snaterials initiator may state a quantified safety requirement f.

ake sure that Wstosi al safety data (kssons associated with the system.

This quantitative safety requirement may be specified (a) SON documents learnsd) are collected, documented, considered, at d d.

Estabhsh procedures to ensure timely follow up in the SON or jointly determined with she used whcie appbcable.

(b) *for comment' DCP (for major on identdied hasards and to take corrective action or

(

6

1.

4 O N 50416 AFat 304-16 S

3 Jocument managsnient deciuons to accep the risks salcty cugincesing sanks ll-C'ni 1389"I8ements. SSGs shoulJ be fornicJ tcpreuntaunc es chair the SSG anJ convcas se withis I associencJ with an iJcunficJ hazarJ.

g 3, goi,g,,i;,g gi,,ptem safety ellora with the as carly as practical as the syucm's his cycle. During year after PMRT. As carher asecting should be c.

Make sure that bbeorical safety d4sa tiensca anaterial ulcey progism the conceptual phase, the project or program manager considered when volume or importance of s

should consider forniang an SSG to supplemens the outstanding safety issues at Phf R T warrants. Iba leas acJ8 froen peevious spaene aquisstions are b.

E stabbshes and m4 nsanais sus 4bly 44doreJ collected, documented, and conuJescJ an deugning synssa ufcey programs for projects *or synaems' safety persomacl eescueces Once SSG edi conust of representahvce fium the uning synacais or facitieses.

cuabinhed, each group w.

com ananJ Al-l.C. and other appropriate Air Force (1) Iagencering feaub hay studies; Draft a c'liarter to tae bra of a go no agrecament and iaJustry ossanisations. If as SSG caint.d under f.

Plan for developing data reqmrcJ so identdy s.

harsrde assacrials and it.ans as prescribed by DOD g

g.8gineering contracts; that designares member responibdities.

Ibe impic mendsg co un ma ad engineering 6050 5-M available through normal Air l'orce (1) Contract engmecting; b.

lee chawed by the program or system manascr managesneas, organimataos membership shoulJ be (4 fagmecting chnge psoposals; 8' designesed sepienentatsve.

retaimd lor coathan attu PMR T Cersamm distrit,ution channels.

SSWG sa permnicJ after members agree anJ the.

3 Apply system safety to in-house development, (5) Engineering of any muscrial impsosements As a rule, mcet at the request of,the program or chairpcason concurs that volume and importance of c.

construction, productiosi, modification, and test project or nonconsruted engineering projecs shar syuem saanagn; hmter, the uung command, ouastamhas safety issues does not warrant automasse progra ms Assuse GF E to contracts is accompanted changes form, fit, or f unction, ami A f SC, A FL C, or a ny oe her member may requess that participation of all snembers.

by appevpriate safety anayises.

(63 Any ayuce modifwassoa t Al Rs 57-4 and the manager convene the group b.

Euabhshes SS WGs for e sisting operational Air b.

Keep A FISC/ S F and A flSC/ SN, as

$71) for whkh AFL C has respon.abahay.

d.

Assist the project, prograni, or system manager Force splems, to augment the morneal day-so day appropriate, inf.stmcJ of the s6hcJune for all majo' Basegrates a system salcty program auto each so carry out the syuem safety prorm by:

syuem safety considerassoas of engineering personnel c.

pressam design reviews, suspcstions, and S$G All C progrant so that sa is consntent wuh onlicr (l) Rmwang anel making tweenmenJ4tions and the Ma crialSakty Task Group. SS WGaincluJc, meetings. Forward copics of SSG a:hartcis for major engincering and Prussam snanageancut astmeics by:

on safety usues submaried to program munagers as as a ammanusn. engineering personnel, system pragrams to AFISC/SE anJ AFISC/SN, as appropnate, for coorJmation.

O) EstaMshing prwcLares to ensure prompt technical reviews, and during Jesasm and test theough ecchmcians, and a representanve from the staff safety followup on identified hasards and to cate aersc6tive g

g,g

,;g g g.gg

aggie, e.

Revs.ew engiacering change proposals-deviations, and wasvers for ampate on sptem safety.

union or documcas man 4gesaene Jccidon. to uceps (2) Esalua.sas major nood.

saons thaa c.

1845 linal authority to desect the formation of the risks asso6utcJ wish an iJcatified hasasJ involved a saiciy conscre before ener Configuration the SSWG from a full SSG for an opcrational system i la conjuction wish using coromanJa, estabhah Control Board acts on the modifkation.

for whnh it has accepted engiucties responubihty.

g ')u'n"s quantatative system safely design criteria when Eisher an SSG w an SSWG win bc acuve at aH nmes JJ r delcainas se on r ne e.

List A FIS C/ S F and AFISC/SN, as iss y

practical. A combined management and enginecting choice shoulJ be based on:

durmg opcrauana and auintenance phases of the appropriate, as advisory members.

unless waivcJ by AFISC/SE, bascJ on the sysica's "I

syneem,

f.

Coordinare the draf t sharter wuh all Speeni (t) Whether she anticipated systern hasards wdl (1) Applying spiem safct to off ahe-shelf SnIF O'O*P member organisations, im;tudies

14. Noamuclear Munitions Safety Board (NNhtSB).

present potential risk to a substantial part of a mnsion capabahty or cadanger lasse numbers of persoonst, o' procusemene items with potentul for cantical or AI.lSC/SE and AFISC/SN, as appropriate, fo' 1he NNMS8 acts as.he SSG for all nonnuclear safety analyss is necesssary for national conf!Jence catasarophic failures and ao "in house

  • Jcsclopment, major programs.

aaJ acceptance of a system.

prodution, mandificasson, anJ sett progsam anuairsons, saciuding air-launcheJ missiles ( A F R 127 16)

12. Isaplementing Commands. 1hese commands (48 Mequiring s follow-on system ulcay cIlart eo (2) Investment cost and feasibehay of obtatning

=dt en ablisti an SSG for appeopriate,sptems unde' I S.

Nuclear Weapons Systems Safesy Creep and analysing quantaestive data.

nuke sure shat ch nges made afier deployment do not introduce hasards'or Jcgrade esinung levels of spion developmns, whcther an opeianonal system (NWSSC). The NWSSGis estabhshed by AFR 122 2 (3) Feasabahey of allocanng mishap petential to s4icsy.

developmene (AFR 300-2) or engineersag v pment W R M O.it to revacw the safety aspects of the design of each elements of the sotal system

($) klanmg sure that historical safety data nuclear weapon,syst m and the procedures for its (4) 1he availabic meates (test or analysas) so lhe systesn resulting may involve hasarJs en employment. This review ensuren that both tbe design a

obtain confidence' that contrutual design gosta or (len a leartwd) alc med mhen appropruse.

personnel or propersy, and and procedures meet DOD nuclear safety standarda (6) Elaking sure sh4 system sahty is conudescJ requirennents for system safety have t ces successfully ta all testing. If normal testing is not sufficient to

b. The effort invol es agencies, commands, other, and provide musimum safety consistent with

.gg, demonstrate safe operation, preparc and anonnot program offices (Post or organisations outuJe the Operational requirements.

14. Air Force I.ogistics rosamand ( AFI C). Tha special ufety aests and evaluations-authority of the implementing comnunJ. NO ll':

a.

To erJJ ius and self-inspeenon,the NWSSG lhese groups will conust of represcatatives freus the as a body accher becomes involved in the normal command:

(4 1 uranhang Al SC information on design usag command, AFSC, Al1C. AFTFC (for suasor Jewetopment process, mor acas as the SSG apecified ia a Essablishes and matatains a capabihey to defniency and inadequacy derncJ frons the tlS Air programs), and approprute DOD and sadustry paragraph II.

cenJust system safety programs by; Force proJuct impresement program (AFR M-30) organisations and other sources for posset,le use in follow on speems (1) gaplaiming system salesy prograns P"

,Y responsibilities and objectives for intracommanJ and design handbooks,

11. Air Force I.ogistka Command ( AFI.C). T his supports the N WSSG by snaking sure that all auclear
    • ""*"d.

safety saindses and analyses as jusrcJ for NWSSG guidance.

J Keeps At ISO /SE and Al ISC/ SN. as Directs the spicna snanager or ocugnatcJ n m mM h h h m h M IM (2) Making sure that organisational structuscs appropriate, informeJ of the inhedule for aptem a.

and resources are adequate to carry out system safety

    • I'""'"8i'***""J"'E**'i""

programs Assign at least one full-time, primary duty

e.,I:stabishes quantasasive system s,ifety slesign spacen safety engineer within the AFLC Air Logistics criterta mhem practicable. A cumluricJ inanagenuent Center to act as local poent for the sys tem safety ef fort.

and enginecting choke shoulJ be bucJ on the same When a specific program does not require full time cs scsu as in paragraph %.

support, ensure that adequate slall assanssace and tagiacering support are provided to accompfhh the SI:C110N D-SYSII kl SAFF1Y GRO11pS 4

2 7

i

O a

A 6

AFR 3e686 RY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF1HE AIR FORCE OttlCIAL.

I l W AB.l EN, JR..Geessal, USAF Chuf of 4:46f V AN L. CR AWFOR D. JR., Coloact, USAF Duasses of Adnumensraason SUMM AR Y sJ CH ANGE S This rewonien e=npacencess neo dasetatoe geven en (JODI34140 36. la senioves she regulateos femen the 127 Saeety

. acrees and places es e etw geG-Acagmesesos nassea. Mater thenges onceuJe: formaldocunnsneauen of snanagenwas decinsens so accepe the rink assechneed web idensefie(, hasards, (pass 9JA aJdressang safct) ranks se the "for commens* decanson sensdansiems papers (para 6aA app.ying system safety to abe conurewie.e phans of facilaams (pasa 9b, and Be), applyang spaene safety so eat the-shcH peucuscneens eacnis (pasa itk11)), and sJensdysag anJ snesnaa4 mag safety stesacal nenis hesing (pasas htb3 and I&123

+

e 4

9 e

[

5 4

w

- - - - -